Defining a positive work environment for hospital healthcare professionals: A Delphi study

The work environment of healthcare professionals is important for good patient care and is receiving increasing attention in scientific research. A clear and unambiguous understanding of a positive work environment, as perceived by healthcare professionals, is crucial for gaining systematic objectiv...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:PloS one 2021-02, Vol.16 (2), p.e0247530-e0247530
Hauptverfasser: Maassen, Susanne M, van Oostveen, Catharina, Vermeulen, Hester, Weggelaar, Anne Marie
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page e0247530
container_issue 2
container_start_page e0247530
container_title PloS one
container_volume 16
creator Maassen, Susanne M
van Oostveen, Catharina
Vermeulen, Hester
Weggelaar, Anne Marie
description The work environment of healthcare professionals is important for good patient care and is receiving increasing attention in scientific research. A clear and unambiguous understanding of a positive work environment, as perceived by healthcare professionals, is crucial for gaining systematic objective insights into the work environment. The aim of this study was to gain consensus on the concept of a positive work environment in the hospital. This was a three-round Delphi study to establish consensus on what defines a positive work environment. A literature review and 17 semi-structured interviews with experts (transcribed and analyzed by open and thematic coding) were used to generate items for the Delphi study. The literature review revealed 228 aspects that were clustered into 48 work environment elements, 38 of which were mentioned in the interviews also. After three Delphi rounds, 36 elements were regarded as belonging to a positive work environment in the hospital. The work environment is a broad concept with several perspectives. Although all 36 elements are considered important for a positive work environment, they have different perspectives. Mapping the included elements revealed that no one work environment measurement tool includes all the elements. We identified 36 elements that are important for a positive work environment. This knowledge can be used to select the right measurement tool or to develop interventions for improving the work environment. However, the different perspectives of the work environment should be considered.
doi_str_mv 10.1371/journal.pone.0247530
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_plos_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_plos_journals_2493460581</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A653037856</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_97f456891bd44dbb9d83b9896b51a95a</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A653037856</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-6334b400de6bfc77f96d3cbd8250341e9152d3a4391d12cb56af02a026883fe73</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNk0tv1DAQxyMEoqXwDRBYQkJw2MWvODEHpFXLY6VKlXgduFiOH7su2TjYzkK_Pd5uWm1QDyiHROPf_D0z-U9RPEVwjkiF3lz6IXSynfe-M3OIaVUSeK84RpzgGcOQ3D_4PioexXgJYUlqxh4WR4QwAjkmx8WPM2Nd57oVkKD30SW3NeC3Dz-B6bYu-G5jugSsD2DtY--SbMHayDatlQwG9MFbE6PzuZD4FizAmWn7tQMxDfrqcfHA5rB5Mr5Pim8f3n89_TQ7v_i4PF2czxTjOM0YIbShEGrDGquqynKmiWp0jUtIKDIclVgTSQlHGmHVlExaiCXErK6JNRU5KZ7vdfvWRzGOJQpMOaEMljXKxHJPaC8vRR_cRoYr4aUT1wEfVkKG5FRrBK8sLVnNUaMp1U3DdU0aXnPWlEjyUmatd-NtQ7MxWuXxBNlORKcnnVuLld-KisPcKskCr0aB4H8NJiaxcVGZtpWd8cN13RRzVuNd3S_-Qe_ubqRWMjfgOuvzvWonKhYsm4JUdckyNb-Dyo82G6eyh6zL8UnC60lCZpL5k1ZyiFEsv3z-f_bi-5R9ecDuzRR9O6TsojgF6R5UwccYjL0dMoJitwI30xC7FRDjCuS0Z4c_6DbpxvPkLw5YAK4</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2493460581</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Defining a positive work environment for hospital healthcare professionals: A Delphi study</title><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry</source><creator>Maassen, Susanne M ; van Oostveen, Catharina ; Vermeulen, Hester ; Weggelaar, Anne Marie</creator><contributor>Alameddine, Mohamad</contributor><creatorcontrib>Maassen, Susanne M ; van Oostveen, Catharina ; Vermeulen, Hester ; Weggelaar, Anne Marie ; Alameddine, Mohamad</creatorcontrib><description>The work environment of healthcare professionals is important for good patient care and is receiving increasing attention in scientific research. A clear and unambiguous understanding of a positive work environment, as perceived by healthcare professionals, is crucial for gaining systematic objective insights into the work environment. The aim of this study was to gain consensus on the concept of a positive work environment in the hospital. This was a three-round Delphi study to establish consensus on what defines a positive work environment. A literature review and 17 semi-structured interviews with experts (transcribed and analyzed by open and thematic coding) were used to generate items for the Delphi study. The literature review revealed 228 aspects that were clustered into 48 work environment elements, 38 of which were mentioned in the interviews also. After three Delphi rounds, 36 elements were regarded as belonging to a positive work environment in the hospital. The work environment is a broad concept with several perspectives. Although all 36 elements are considered important for a positive work environment, they have different perspectives. Mapping the included elements revealed that no one work environment measurement tool includes all the elements. We identified 36 elements that are important for a positive work environment. This knowledge can be used to select the right measurement tool or to develop interventions for improving the work environment. However, the different perspectives of the work environment should be considered.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0247530</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33630923</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Public Library of Science</publisher><subject>Beliefs, opinions and attitudes ; Biology and Life Sciences ; Corporate culture ; COVID-19 ; Delphi method ; Delphi technique ; Editing ; Employees ; Engineering and Technology ; Environmental management ; Funding ; Health care ; Health care facilities ; Health policy ; Literature reviews ; Medical personnel ; Medical research ; Medicine and Health Sciences ; Methodology ; Nurses ; Nursing ; Organizations ; Pandemics ; Patient safety ; Patients ; People and Places ; Professionals ; Psychological aspects ; Scientific research ; Social Sciences ; Work environment ; Working conditions</subject><ispartof>PloS one, 2021-02, Vol.16 (2), p.e0247530-e0247530</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2021 Public Library of Science</rights><rights>2021 Maassen et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>2021 Maassen et al 2021 Maassen et al</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-6334b400de6bfc77f96d3cbd8250341e9152d3a4391d12cb56af02a026883fe73</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-6334b400de6bfc77f96d3cbd8250341e9152d3a4391d12cb56af02a026883fe73</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-3183-1176</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7906333/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7906333/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,864,885,2100,2926,23865,27923,27924,53790,53792,79371,79372</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33630923$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Alameddine, Mohamad</contributor><creatorcontrib>Maassen, Susanne M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Oostveen, Catharina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vermeulen, Hester</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weggelaar, Anne Marie</creatorcontrib><title>Defining a positive work environment for hospital healthcare professionals: A Delphi study</title><title>PloS one</title><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><description>The work environment of healthcare professionals is important for good patient care and is receiving increasing attention in scientific research. A clear and unambiguous understanding of a positive work environment, as perceived by healthcare professionals, is crucial for gaining systematic objective insights into the work environment. The aim of this study was to gain consensus on the concept of a positive work environment in the hospital. This was a three-round Delphi study to establish consensus on what defines a positive work environment. A literature review and 17 semi-structured interviews with experts (transcribed and analyzed by open and thematic coding) were used to generate items for the Delphi study. The literature review revealed 228 aspects that were clustered into 48 work environment elements, 38 of which were mentioned in the interviews also. After three Delphi rounds, 36 elements were regarded as belonging to a positive work environment in the hospital. The work environment is a broad concept with several perspectives. Although all 36 elements are considered important for a positive work environment, they have different perspectives. Mapping the included elements revealed that no one work environment measurement tool includes all the elements. We identified 36 elements that are important for a positive work environment. This knowledge can be used to select the right measurement tool or to develop interventions for improving the work environment. However, the different perspectives of the work environment should be considered.</description><subject>Beliefs, opinions and attitudes</subject><subject>Biology and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Corporate culture</subject><subject>COVID-19</subject><subject>Delphi method</subject><subject>Delphi technique</subject><subject>Editing</subject><subject>Employees</subject><subject>Engineering and Technology</subject><subject>Environmental management</subject><subject>Funding</subject><subject>Health care</subject><subject>Health care facilities</subject><subject>Health policy</subject><subject>Literature reviews</subject><subject>Medical personnel</subject><subject>Medical research</subject><subject>Medicine and Health Sciences</subject><subject>Methodology</subject><subject>Nurses</subject><subject>Nursing</subject><subject>Organizations</subject><subject>Pandemics</subject><subject>Patient safety</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>People and Places</subject><subject>Professionals</subject><subject>Psychological aspects</subject><subject>Scientific research</subject><subject>Social Sciences</subject><subject>Work environment</subject><subject>Working conditions</subject><issn>1932-6203</issn><issn>1932-6203</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNqNk0tv1DAQxyMEoqXwDRBYQkJw2MWvODEHpFXLY6VKlXgduFiOH7su2TjYzkK_Pd5uWm1QDyiHROPf_D0z-U9RPEVwjkiF3lz6IXSynfe-M3OIaVUSeK84RpzgGcOQ3D_4PioexXgJYUlqxh4WR4QwAjkmx8WPM2Nd57oVkKD30SW3NeC3Dz-B6bYu-G5jugSsD2DtY--SbMHayDatlQwG9MFbE6PzuZD4FizAmWn7tQMxDfrqcfHA5rB5Mr5Pim8f3n89_TQ7v_i4PF2czxTjOM0YIbShEGrDGquqynKmiWp0jUtIKDIclVgTSQlHGmHVlExaiCXErK6JNRU5KZ7vdfvWRzGOJQpMOaEMljXKxHJPaC8vRR_cRoYr4aUT1wEfVkKG5FRrBK8sLVnNUaMp1U3DdU0aXnPWlEjyUmatd-NtQ7MxWuXxBNlORKcnnVuLld-KisPcKskCr0aB4H8NJiaxcVGZtpWd8cN13RRzVuNd3S_-Qe_ubqRWMjfgOuvzvWonKhYsm4JUdckyNb-Dyo82G6eyh6zL8UnC60lCZpL5k1ZyiFEsv3z-f_bi-5R9ecDuzRR9O6TsojgF6R5UwccYjL0dMoJitwI30xC7FRDjCuS0Z4c_6DbpxvPkLw5YAK4</recordid><startdate>20210225</startdate><enddate>20210225</enddate><creator>Maassen, Susanne M</creator><creator>van Oostveen, Catharina</creator><creator>Vermeulen, Hester</creator><creator>Weggelaar, Anne Marie</creator><general>Public Library of Science</general><general>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>IOV</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3183-1176</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20210225</creationdate><title>Defining a positive work environment for hospital healthcare professionals: A Delphi study</title><author>Maassen, Susanne M ; van Oostveen, Catharina ; Vermeulen, Hester ; Weggelaar, Anne Marie</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-6334b400de6bfc77f96d3cbd8250341e9152d3a4391d12cb56af02a026883fe73</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Beliefs, opinions and attitudes</topic><topic>Biology and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Corporate culture</topic><topic>COVID-19</topic><topic>Delphi method</topic><topic>Delphi technique</topic><topic>Editing</topic><topic>Employees</topic><topic>Engineering and Technology</topic><topic>Environmental management</topic><topic>Funding</topic><topic>Health care</topic><topic>Health care facilities</topic><topic>Health policy</topic><topic>Literature reviews</topic><topic>Medical personnel</topic><topic>Medical research</topic><topic>Medicine and Health Sciences</topic><topic>Methodology</topic><topic>Nurses</topic><topic>Nursing</topic><topic>Organizations</topic><topic>Pandemics</topic><topic>Patient safety</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>People and Places</topic><topic>Professionals</topic><topic>Psychological aspects</topic><topic>Scientific research</topic><topic>Social Sciences</topic><topic>Work environment</topic><topic>Working conditions</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Maassen, Susanne M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Oostveen, Catharina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vermeulen, Hester</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weggelaar, Anne Marie</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Opposing Viewpoints</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Materials Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Maassen, Susanne M</au><au>van Oostveen, Catharina</au><au>Vermeulen, Hester</au><au>Weggelaar, Anne Marie</au><au>Alameddine, Mohamad</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Defining a positive work environment for hospital healthcare professionals: A Delphi study</atitle><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><date>2021-02-25</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>16</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>e0247530</spage><epage>e0247530</epage><pages>e0247530-e0247530</pages><issn>1932-6203</issn><eissn>1932-6203</eissn><abstract>The work environment of healthcare professionals is important for good patient care and is receiving increasing attention in scientific research. A clear and unambiguous understanding of a positive work environment, as perceived by healthcare professionals, is crucial for gaining systematic objective insights into the work environment. The aim of this study was to gain consensus on the concept of a positive work environment in the hospital. This was a three-round Delphi study to establish consensus on what defines a positive work environment. A literature review and 17 semi-structured interviews with experts (transcribed and analyzed by open and thematic coding) were used to generate items for the Delphi study. The literature review revealed 228 aspects that were clustered into 48 work environment elements, 38 of which were mentioned in the interviews also. After three Delphi rounds, 36 elements were regarded as belonging to a positive work environment in the hospital. The work environment is a broad concept with several perspectives. Although all 36 elements are considered important for a positive work environment, they have different perspectives. Mapping the included elements revealed that no one work environment measurement tool includes all the elements. We identified 36 elements that are important for a positive work environment. This knowledge can be used to select the right measurement tool or to develop interventions for improving the work environment. However, the different perspectives of the work environment should be considered.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Public Library of Science</pub><pmid>33630923</pmid><doi>10.1371/journal.pone.0247530</doi><tpages>e0247530</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3183-1176</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1932-6203
ispartof PloS one, 2021-02, Vol.16 (2), p.e0247530-e0247530
issn 1932-6203
1932-6203
language eng
recordid cdi_plos_journals_2493460581
source DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Public Library of Science (PLoS); EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central; Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry
subjects Beliefs, opinions and attitudes
Biology and Life Sciences
Corporate culture
COVID-19
Delphi method
Delphi technique
Editing
Employees
Engineering and Technology
Environmental management
Funding
Health care
Health care facilities
Health policy
Literature reviews
Medical personnel
Medical research
Medicine and Health Sciences
Methodology
Nurses
Nursing
Organizations
Pandemics
Patient safety
Patients
People and Places
Professionals
Psychological aspects
Scientific research
Social Sciences
Work environment
Working conditions
title Defining a positive work environment for hospital healthcare professionals: A Delphi study
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-13T07%3A56%3A00IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_plos_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Defining%20a%20positive%20work%20environment%20for%20hospital%20healthcare%20professionals:%20A%20Delphi%20study&rft.jtitle=PloS%20one&rft.au=Maassen,%20Susanne%20M&rft.date=2021-02-25&rft.volume=16&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=e0247530&rft.epage=e0247530&rft.pages=e0247530-e0247530&rft.issn=1932-6203&rft.eissn=1932-6203&rft_id=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0247530&rft_dat=%3Cgale_plos_%3EA653037856%3C/gale_plos_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2493460581&rft_id=info:pmid/33630923&rft_galeid=A653037856&rft_doaj_id=oai_doaj_org_article_97f456891bd44dbb9d83b9896b51a95a&rfr_iscdi=true