How clinician-patient communication affects trust in health information sources: Temporal trends from a national cross-sectional survey

Understanding patients' trust in health information sources is critical to designing work systems in healthcare. Patient-centered communication during the visit might be a major factor in shaping patients' trust in information sources. The purpose of this paper is to explore relationships...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:PloS one 2021-02, Vol.16 (2), p.e0247583-e0247583
Hauptverfasser: Asan, Onur, Yu, Zhongyuan, Crotty, Bradley H
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page e0247583
container_issue 2
container_start_page e0247583
container_title PloS one
container_volume 16
creator Asan, Onur
Yu, Zhongyuan
Crotty, Bradley H
description Understanding patients' trust in health information sources is critical to designing work systems in healthcare. Patient-centered communication during the visit might be a major factor in shaping patients' trust in information sources. The purpose of this paper is to explore relationships between patient ratings of clinician communication during the visit and patient trust in health information sources. We conducted a secondary analysis of the nationally-representative Health Information National Trends Surveys; HINTS4 Cycle1 (2011), HINTS4 Cycle4 (2014), and HINTS5 Cycle1 (2017), and HINTS5 Cycle2 (2018). We created a composite score of patient-centered communication from five questions and dichotomized at the median. We created multivariable logistic regression models to see how patient-centered communication influenced trust in different information sources across cycles. Consecutively, we used hierarchical analysis for aggregated data. We analyzed data from 14,425 individuals. In the adjusted logistic models for each cycle and the hierarchical model, clinicians' perceived patient-centered communication skills were significantly associated with increased trust in the clinicians as an information source. Clinicians still represent an essential source of trustworthy information reinforced by patient-centered communication skills. Given that trust helps build healing relationships that lead to better healthcare outcomes, communication sets an essential foundation to establish necessary trust. Interpreting information from the internet sources for patients is likely to remain a vital clinician function.
doi_str_mv 10.1371/journal.pone.0247583
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_plos_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_plos_journals_2493460551</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A653037896</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_4facd0e3eee44ef5ba2293e916e1db4f</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A653037896</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-65a32753c028647fba49283ea17a413389c8df211c9b520072e4135dbcc3dc853</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNk81u1DAQxyMEoqXwBggiISE4ZPFH7MQckKoK6EqVKkHhajnOeNerJN7aSaFPwGvjbLbVBvWAfLA9_s3f4_FMkrzEaIFpgT9s3OA71Sy2roMFInnBSvooOcaCkowTRB8frI-SZyFsEGK05PxpckQpp0gwcpz8OXe_Ut3Yzmqrumyregtdn2rXtkO0xa3rUmUM6D6kvR9Cn9ouXYNq-nVcGefbiQkxHA3hY3oF7dZ51UQaujqkxrs2VWm3w6JZexdCFqLgtA-Dv4Hb58kTo5oAL_bzSfLjy-ers_Ps4vLr8uz0ItNckD7jTFFSMKoRKXlemErlgpQUFC5UjikthS5rQzDWomIEoYJANLO60prWumT0JHk96W4bF-Q-h0GSXNCcI8ZwJJYTUTu1kVtvW-VvpVNW7gzOr6TyvdUNyNwoXSOgAJDnYFilCBEUBOaA6yo3UevT_rahaqHWMbUxMzPR-Uln13LlbmQhEKd0DPfdXsC76wFCL1sbNDSN6sANu7hzIkrERUTf_IM-_Lo9tVLxAeMHxnv1KCpPOaOIFqXgkVo8QMVRQ2t1LDhjo33m8H7mEJkefvcrNYQgl9-__T97-XPOvj1gp7ILrhnG2glzMJ_AXXl5MPdJxkiO_XKXDTn2i9z3S3R7dfhB9053DUL_ArPkEy0</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2493460551</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>How clinician-patient communication affects trust in health information sources: Temporal trends from a national cross-sectional survey</title><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry</source><source>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</source><creator>Asan, Onur ; Yu, Zhongyuan ; Crotty, Bradley H</creator><creatorcontrib>Asan, Onur ; Yu, Zhongyuan ; Crotty, Bradley H</creatorcontrib><description>Understanding patients' trust in health information sources is critical to designing work systems in healthcare. Patient-centered communication during the visit might be a major factor in shaping patients' trust in information sources. The purpose of this paper is to explore relationships between patient ratings of clinician communication during the visit and patient trust in health information sources. We conducted a secondary analysis of the nationally-representative Health Information National Trends Surveys; HINTS4 Cycle1 (2011), HINTS4 Cycle4 (2014), and HINTS5 Cycle1 (2017), and HINTS5 Cycle2 (2018). We created a composite score of patient-centered communication from five questions and dichotomized at the median. We created multivariable logistic regression models to see how patient-centered communication influenced trust in different information sources across cycles. Consecutively, we used hierarchical analysis for aggregated data. We analyzed data from 14,425 individuals. In the adjusted logistic models for each cycle and the hierarchical model, clinicians' perceived patient-centered communication skills were significantly associated with increased trust in the clinicians as an information source. Clinicians still represent an essential source of trustworthy information reinforced by patient-centered communication skills. Given that trust helps build healing relationships that lead to better healthcare outcomes, communication sets an essential foundation to establish necessary trust. Interpreting information from the internet sources for patients is likely to remain a vital clinician function.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0247583</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33630952</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Public Library of Science</publisher><subject>Cancer ; Communication ; Computer and Information Sciences ; Cross-sectional studies ; Editing ; Health care ; Health care delivery ; Information literacy ; Information sources ; Internet ; Medical advice systems ; Medical personnel and patient ; Medicine and Health Sciences ; Methodology ; Minority &amp; ethnic groups ; Patient satisfaction ; Patients ; People and Places ; Perceptions ; Psychological aspects ; Social networks ; Social Sciences ; Socio-economic aspects ; Surveys ; Technology ; Trends ; Trust ; Trust (Psychology) ; Web portals</subject><ispartof>PloS one, 2021-02, Vol.16 (2), p.e0247583-e0247583</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2021 Public Library of Science</rights><rights>2021 Asan et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>2021 Asan et al 2021 Asan et al</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-65a32753c028647fba49283ea17a413389c8df211c9b520072e4135dbcc3dc853</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-65a32753c028647fba49283ea17a413389c8df211c9b520072e4135dbcc3dc853</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-9239-3723</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7906335/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7906335/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,860,881,2096,2915,23845,27901,27902,53766,53768,79342,79343</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33630952$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Asan, Onur</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yu, Zhongyuan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Crotty, Bradley H</creatorcontrib><title>How clinician-patient communication affects trust in health information sources: Temporal trends from a national cross-sectional survey</title><title>PloS one</title><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><description>Understanding patients' trust in health information sources is critical to designing work systems in healthcare. Patient-centered communication during the visit might be a major factor in shaping patients' trust in information sources. The purpose of this paper is to explore relationships between patient ratings of clinician communication during the visit and patient trust in health information sources. We conducted a secondary analysis of the nationally-representative Health Information National Trends Surveys; HINTS4 Cycle1 (2011), HINTS4 Cycle4 (2014), and HINTS5 Cycle1 (2017), and HINTS5 Cycle2 (2018). We created a composite score of patient-centered communication from five questions and dichotomized at the median. We created multivariable logistic regression models to see how patient-centered communication influenced trust in different information sources across cycles. Consecutively, we used hierarchical analysis for aggregated data. We analyzed data from 14,425 individuals. In the adjusted logistic models for each cycle and the hierarchical model, clinicians' perceived patient-centered communication skills were significantly associated with increased trust in the clinicians as an information source. Clinicians still represent an essential source of trustworthy information reinforced by patient-centered communication skills. Given that trust helps build healing relationships that lead to better healthcare outcomes, communication sets an essential foundation to establish necessary trust. Interpreting information from the internet sources for patients is likely to remain a vital clinician function.</description><subject>Cancer</subject><subject>Communication</subject><subject>Computer and Information Sciences</subject><subject>Cross-sectional studies</subject><subject>Editing</subject><subject>Health care</subject><subject>Health care delivery</subject><subject>Information literacy</subject><subject>Information sources</subject><subject>Internet</subject><subject>Medical advice systems</subject><subject>Medical personnel and patient</subject><subject>Medicine and Health Sciences</subject><subject>Methodology</subject><subject>Minority &amp; ethnic groups</subject><subject>Patient satisfaction</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>People and Places</subject><subject>Perceptions</subject><subject>Psychological aspects</subject><subject>Social networks</subject><subject>Social Sciences</subject><subject>Socio-economic aspects</subject><subject>Surveys</subject><subject>Technology</subject><subject>Trends</subject><subject>Trust</subject><subject>Trust (Psychology)</subject><subject>Web portals</subject><issn>1932-6203</issn><issn>1932-6203</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNqNk81u1DAQxyMEoqXwBggiISE4ZPFH7MQckKoK6EqVKkHhajnOeNerJN7aSaFPwGvjbLbVBvWAfLA9_s3f4_FMkrzEaIFpgT9s3OA71Sy2roMFInnBSvooOcaCkowTRB8frI-SZyFsEGK05PxpckQpp0gwcpz8OXe_Ut3Yzmqrumyregtdn2rXtkO0xa3rUmUM6D6kvR9Cn9ouXYNq-nVcGefbiQkxHA3hY3oF7dZ51UQaujqkxrs2VWm3w6JZexdCFqLgtA-Dv4Hb58kTo5oAL_bzSfLjy-ers_Ps4vLr8uz0ItNckD7jTFFSMKoRKXlemErlgpQUFC5UjikthS5rQzDWomIEoYJANLO60prWumT0JHk96W4bF-Q-h0GSXNCcI8ZwJJYTUTu1kVtvW-VvpVNW7gzOr6TyvdUNyNwoXSOgAJDnYFilCBEUBOaA6yo3UevT_rahaqHWMbUxMzPR-Uln13LlbmQhEKd0DPfdXsC76wFCL1sbNDSN6sANu7hzIkrERUTf_IM-_Lo9tVLxAeMHxnv1KCpPOaOIFqXgkVo8QMVRQ2t1LDhjo33m8H7mEJkefvcrNYQgl9-__T97-XPOvj1gp7ILrhnG2glzMJ_AXXl5MPdJxkiO_XKXDTn2i9z3S3R7dfhB9053DUL_ArPkEy0</recordid><startdate>20210225</startdate><enddate>20210225</enddate><creator>Asan, Onur</creator><creator>Yu, Zhongyuan</creator><creator>Crotty, Bradley H</creator><general>Public Library of Science</general><general>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>IOV</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>COVID</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9239-3723</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20210225</creationdate><title>How clinician-patient communication affects trust in health information sources: Temporal trends from a national cross-sectional survey</title><author>Asan, Onur ; Yu, Zhongyuan ; Crotty, Bradley H</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-65a32753c028647fba49283ea17a413389c8df211c9b520072e4135dbcc3dc853</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Cancer</topic><topic>Communication</topic><topic>Computer and Information Sciences</topic><topic>Cross-sectional studies</topic><topic>Editing</topic><topic>Health care</topic><topic>Health care delivery</topic><topic>Information literacy</topic><topic>Information sources</topic><topic>Internet</topic><topic>Medical advice systems</topic><topic>Medical personnel and patient</topic><topic>Medicine and Health Sciences</topic><topic>Methodology</topic><topic>Minority &amp; ethnic groups</topic><topic>Patient satisfaction</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>People and Places</topic><topic>Perceptions</topic><topic>Psychological aspects</topic><topic>Social networks</topic><topic>Social Sciences</topic><topic>Socio-economic aspects</topic><topic>Surveys</topic><topic>Technology</topic><topic>Trends</topic><topic>Trust</topic><topic>Trust (Psychology)</topic><topic>Web portals</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Asan, Onur</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yu, Zhongyuan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Crotty, Bradley H</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Opposing Viewpoints</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Coronavirus Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Materials Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Asan, Onur</au><au>Yu, Zhongyuan</au><au>Crotty, Bradley H</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>How clinician-patient communication affects trust in health information sources: Temporal trends from a national cross-sectional survey</atitle><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><date>2021-02-25</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>16</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>e0247583</spage><epage>e0247583</epage><pages>e0247583-e0247583</pages><issn>1932-6203</issn><eissn>1932-6203</eissn><abstract>Understanding patients' trust in health information sources is critical to designing work systems in healthcare. Patient-centered communication during the visit might be a major factor in shaping patients' trust in information sources. The purpose of this paper is to explore relationships between patient ratings of clinician communication during the visit and patient trust in health information sources. We conducted a secondary analysis of the nationally-representative Health Information National Trends Surveys; HINTS4 Cycle1 (2011), HINTS4 Cycle4 (2014), and HINTS5 Cycle1 (2017), and HINTS5 Cycle2 (2018). We created a composite score of patient-centered communication from five questions and dichotomized at the median. We created multivariable logistic regression models to see how patient-centered communication influenced trust in different information sources across cycles. Consecutively, we used hierarchical analysis for aggregated data. We analyzed data from 14,425 individuals. In the adjusted logistic models for each cycle and the hierarchical model, clinicians' perceived patient-centered communication skills were significantly associated with increased trust in the clinicians as an information source. Clinicians still represent an essential source of trustworthy information reinforced by patient-centered communication skills. Given that trust helps build healing relationships that lead to better healthcare outcomes, communication sets an essential foundation to establish necessary trust. Interpreting information from the internet sources for patients is likely to remain a vital clinician function.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Public Library of Science</pub><pmid>33630952</pmid><doi>10.1371/journal.pone.0247583</doi><tpages>e0247583</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9239-3723</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1932-6203
ispartof PloS one, 2021-02, Vol.16 (2), p.e0247583-e0247583
issn 1932-6203
1932-6203
language eng
recordid cdi_plos_journals_2493460551
source DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central; Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry; Public Library of Science (PLoS)
subjects Cancer
Communication
Computer and Information Sciences
Cross-sectional studies
Editing
Health care
Health care delivery
Information literacy
Information sources
Internet
Medical advice systems
Medical personnel and patient
Medicine and Health Sciences
Methodology
Minority & ethnic groups
Patient satisfaction
Patients
People and Places
Perceptions
Psychological aspects
Social networks
Social Sciences
Socio-economic aspects
Surveys
Technology
Trends
Trust
Trust (Psychology)
Web portals
title How clinician-patient communication affects trust in health information sources: Temporal trends from a national cross-sectional survey
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-09T14%3A07%3A58IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_plos_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=How%20clinician-patient%20communication%20affects%20trust%20in%20health%20information%20sources:%20Temporal%20trends%20from%20a%20national%20cross-sectional%20survey&rft.jtitle=PloS%20one&rft.au=Asan,%20Onur&rft.date=2021-02-25&rft.volume=16&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=e0247583&rft.epage=e0247583&rft.pages=e0247583-e0247583&rft.issn=1932-6203&rft.eissn=1932-6203&rft_id=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0247583&rft_dat=%3Cgale_plos_%3EA653037896%3C/gale_plos_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2493460551&rft_id=info:pmid/33630952&rft_galeid=A653037896&rft_doaj_id=oai_doaj_org_article_4facd0e3eee44ef5ba2293e916e1db4f&rfr_iscdi=true