Top-down and sideways: Herbivory and cross-ecosystem connectivity shape restoration success at the salt marsh-upland ecotone
Wetland restoration provides remarkable opportunities to understand vegetation dynamics and to inform success of future projects through rigorous restoration experiments. Salt marsh restoration typically focuses on physical factors such as sediment dynamics and elevation. Despite many demonstrations...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | PloS one 2021-02, Vol.16 (2), p.e0247374-e0247374 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | e0247374 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | e0247374 |
container_title | PloS one |
container_volume | 16 |
creator | Wasson, Kerstin Tanner, Karen E Woofolk, Andrea McCain, Sean Suraci, Justin P |
description | Wetland restoration provides remarkable opportunities to understand vegetation dynamics and to inform success of future projects through rigorous restoration experiments. Salt marsh restoration typically focuses on physical factors such as sediment dynamics and elevation. Despite many demonstrations of strong top-down effects on salt marshes, the potential for consumers to affect salt marsh restoration projects has rarely been quantified. Recently, major restoration projects at the Elkhorn Slough National Estuarine Research Reserve in central California, USA provided an opportunity to examine how herbivory influences restoration success. We quantified the strength of consumer effects by comparing caged to uncaged plantings, and compared effects among plant species and sites. We used camera traps to detect which herbivores were most common and how their abundance varied spatially. Beyond characterizing consumer effects, we also tested management strategies for reducing negative effects of herbivory at the restoration sites, including caging, mowing, and acoustic playbacks of predator sounds. We found extremely strong consumer effects at sites with extensive stands of exotic forbs upland of the high marsh; uncaged restoration plants suffered heavy herbivory and high mortality, while most caged plants survived. Brush rabbits (Sylvilagus bachmani) were by far the most frequent consumers of these high marsh plants. Our work thus provides the first evidence of mammal consumers affecting salt marsh restoration success. Mowing of tall exotic forb cover adjacent to the marsh at one restoration site greatly reduced consumption, and nearly all monitored plantings survived at a second restoration site where construction had temporarily eliminated upland cover. Playbacks of predator sounds did not significantly affect restoration plantings, but restoration efforts in marsh communities vulnerable to terrestrial herbivory may benefit from concurrent restoration of predator communities in the upland habitats surrounding the marsh. A landscape approach is thus critical for recognizing linkages between terrestrial and marine vegetation. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1371/journal.pone.0247374 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_plos_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_plos_journals_2492268658</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A652669352</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_7458b72ebaab47a2a6bc95bd881efeff</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A652669352</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-b9972dcf537f66f0151b0747f7669e480b40d7fe2b60e01691f1c96a993f1dd63</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNk1GL1DAQx4so3nn6DUQLguhD16Rpk9YH4TjUWzg40NPXkKaTbZZuU5N0zwU_vOlu79jKPUgfWqa_-c_kn5koeonRAhOGP6zNYDvRLnrTwQKlGSMsexSd4pKkCU0ReXz0fRI9c26NUE4KSp9GJ4RQzPK8OI3-3Jg-qc1tF4uujp2u4Vbs3Mf4Emylt8bu9nFpjXMJSON2zsMmlqbrQHq91X4Xu0b0EFtw3ljhteliN0gJzsXCx76B2InWxxthXZMMfTvqBSUf2n4ePVGidfBiep9FP758vrm4TK6uvy4vzq8SScvUJ1VZsrSWKidMUaoQznGFWMYUo7SErEBVhmqmIK0oAoRpiRWWJRVlSRSua0rOotcH3b41jk_GOZ5mZZrSguZFIJYHojZizXurQ7s7boTm-4CxKy6s17IFzrK8qFgKlRBVxkQqaCXLvKqLAoMCpYLWp6naUG2gltB5K9qZ6PxPpxu-MlvOitBxPrb7bhKw5tcQfOUb7SS0wToww6FvSlFekoC--Qd9-HQTtRLhALpTJtSVoyg_p3nQCmXTQC0eoMJTw0aHGwelQ3yW8H6WEBgPv_1KDM7x5fdv_89e_5yzb4_YBsL4NM60wzhbbg5mB3A_nxbUvckY8XFJ7tzg45LwaUlC2qvjC7pPutsK8hcytg8u</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2492268658</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Top-down and sideways: Herbivory and cross-ecosystem connectivity shape restoration success at the salt marsh-upland ecotone</title><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Public Library of Science (PLoS) Journals Open Access</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry</source><creator>Wasson, Kerstin ; Tanner, Karen E ; Woofolk, Andrea ; McCain, Sean ; Suraci, Justin P</creator><contributor>Root, Karen</contributor><creatorcontrib>Wasson, Kerstin ; Tanner, Karen E ; Woofolk, Andrea ; McCain, Sean ; Suraci, Justin P ; Root, Karen</creatorcontrib><description>Wetland restoration provides remarkable opportunities to understand vegetation dynamics and to inform success of future projects through rigorous restoration experiments. Salt marsh restoration typically focuses on physical factors such as sediment dynamics and elevation. Despite many demonstrations of strong top-down effects on salt marshes, the potential for consumers to affect salt marsh restoration projects has rarely been quantified. Recently, major restoration projects at the Elkhorn Slough National Estuarine Research Reserve in central California, USA provided an opportunity to examine how herbivory influences restoration success. We quantified the strength of consumer effects by comparing caged to uncaged plantings, and compared effects among plant species and sites. We used camera traps to detect which herbivores were most common and how their abundance varied spatially. Beyond characterizing consumer effects, we also tested management strategies for reducing negative effects of herbivory at the restoration sites, including caging, mowing, and acoustic playbacks of predator sounds. We found extremely strong consumer effects at sites with extensive stands of exotic forbs upland of the high marsh; uncaged restoration plants suffered heavy herbivory and high mortality, while most caged plants survived. Brush rabbits (Sylvilagus bachmani) were by far the most frequent consumers of these high marsh plants. Our work thus provides the first evidence of mammal consumers affecting salt marsh restoration success. Mowing of tall exotic forb cover adjacent to the marsh at one restoration site greatly reduced consumption, and nearly all monitored plantings survived at a second restoration site where construction had temporarily eliminated upland cover. Playbacks of predator sounds did not significantly affect restoration plantings, but restoration efforts in marsh communities vulnerable to terrestrial herbivory may benefit from concurrent restoration of predator communities in the upland habitats surrounding the marsh. A landscape approach is thus critical for recognizing linkages between terrestrial and marine vegetation.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0247374</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33617558</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Public Library of Science</publisher><subject>Aquatic birds ; Biological evolution ; Biology ; Biology and Life Sciences ; Coastal ecosystems ; Digital Elevation Models ; Digital imaging ; Domestic animals ; Drainage ; Earth Sciences ; Ecological research ; Ecological restoration ; Ecology ; Ecology and Environmental Sciences ; Ecosystem biology ; Ecosystem services ; Editing ; Engineering and Technology ; Environmental aspects ; Environmental restoration ; Environmental studies ; Estuaries ; Estuarine ecosystems ; Evolutionary biology ; Forbs ; Grasslands ; Guinea pigs ; Herbivores ; Herbivory ; Horses ; Management ; Methodology ; Methods ; Natural history ; People and places ; Planting ; Protection and preservation ; Research and Analysis Methods ; Restoration ; Reviews ; Salt marshes ; Sediments ; Soil compaction ; Soil erosion ; Terrestrial environments ; Tidal marshes ; Trampling ; Trees ; Vegetation ; Vegetation dynamics ; Visualization ; Wetland soils ; Wetlands ; Wildlife</subject><ispartof>PloS one, 2021-02, Vol.16 (2), p.e0247374-e0247374</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2021 Public Library of Science</rights><rights>2021 Wasson et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>2021 Wasson et al 2021 Wasson et al</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-b9972dcf537f66f0151b0747f7669e480b40d7fe2b60e01691f1c96a993f1dd63</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-b9972dcf537f66f0151b0747f7669e480b40d7fe2b60e01691f1c96a993f1dd63</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-7952-1658 ; 0000-0002-1858-4505 ; 0000-0003-4522-6110</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7899356/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7899356/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,864,885,2102,2928,23866,27924,27925,53791,53793,79600,79601</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33617558$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Root, Karen</contributor><creatorcontrib>Wasson, Kerstin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tanner, Karen E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Woofolk, Andrea</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McCain, Sean</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Suraci, Justin P</creatorcontrib><title>Top-down and sideways: Herbivory and cross-ecosystem connectivity shape restoration success at the salt marsh-upland ecotone</title><title>PloS one</title><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><description>Wetland restoration provides remarkable opportunities to understand vegetation dynamics and to inform success of future projects through rigorous restoration experiments. Salt marsh restoration typically focuses on physical factors such as sediment dynamics and elevation. Despite many demonstrations of strong top-down effects on salt marshes, the potential for consumers to affect salt marsh restoration projects has rarely been quantified. Recently, major restoration projects at the Elkhorn Slough National Estuarine Research Reserve in central California, USA provided an opportunity to examine how herbivory influences restoration success. We quantified the strength of consumer effects by comparing caged to uncaged plantings, and compared effects among plant species and sites. We used camera traps to detect which herbivores were most common and how their abundance varied spatially. Beyond characterizing consumer effects, we also tested management strategies for reducing negative effects of herbivory at the restoration sites, including caging, mowing, and acoustic playbacks of predator sounds. We found extremely strong consumer effects at sites with extensive stands of exotic forbs upland of the high marsh; uncaged restoration plants suffered heavy herbivory and high mortality, while most caged plants survived. Brush rabbits (Sylvilagus bachmani) were by far the most frequent consumers of these high marsh plants. Our work thus provides the first evidence of mammal consumers affecting salt marsh restoration success. Mowing of tall exotic forb cover adjacent to the marsh at one restoration site greatly reduced consumption, and nearly all monitored plantings survived at a second restoration site where construction had temporarily eliminated upland cover. Playbacks of predator sounds did not significantly affect restoration plantings, but restoration efforts in marsh communities vulnerable to terrestrial herbivory may benefit from concurrent restoration of predator communities in the upland habitats surrounding the marsh. A landscape approach is thus critical for recognizing linkages between terrestrial and marine vegetation.</description><subject>Aquatic birds</subject><subject>Biological evolution</subject><subject>Biology</subject><subject>Biology and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Coastal ecosystems</subject><subject>Digital Elevation Models</subject><subject>Digital imaging</subject><subject>Domestic animals</subject><subject>Drainage</subject><subject>Earth Sciences</subject><subject>Ecological research</subject><subject>Ecological restoration</subject><subject>Ecology</subject><subject>Ecology and Environmental Sciences</subject><subject>Ecosystem biology</subject><subject>Ecosystem services</subject><subject>Editing</subject><subject>Engineering and Technology</subject><subject>Environmental aspects</subject><subject>Environmental restoration</subject><subject>Environmental studies</subject><subject>Estuaries</subject><subject>Estuarine ecosystems</subject><subject>Evolutionary biology</subject><subject>Forbs</subject><subject>Grasslands</subject><subject>Guinea pigs</subject><subject>Herbivores</subject><subject>Herbivory</subject><subject>Horses</subject><subject>Management</subject><subject>Methodology</subject><subject>Methods</subject><subject>Natural history</subject><subject>People and places</subject><subject>Planting</subject><subject>Protection and preservation</subject><subject>Research and Analysis Methods</subject><subject>Restoration</subject><subject>Reviews</subject><subject>Salt marshes</subject><subject>Sediments</subject><subject>Soil compaction</subject><subject>Soil erosion</subject><subject>Terrestrial environments</subject><subject>Tidal marshes</subject><subject>Trampling</subject><subject>Trees</subject><subject>Vegetation</subject><subject>Vegetation dynamics</subject><subject>Visualization</subject><subject>Wetland soils</subject><subject>Wetlands</subject><subject>Wildlife</subject><issn>1932-6203</issn><issn>1932-6203</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNqNk1GL1DAQx4so3nn6DUQLguhD16Rpk9YH4TjUWzg40NPXkKaTbZZuU5N0zwU_vOlu79jKPUgfWqa_-c_kn5koeonRAhOGP6zNYDvRLnrTwQKlGSMsexSd4pKkCU0ReXz0fRI9c26NUE4KSp9GJ4RQzPK8OI3-3Jg-qc1tF4uujp2u4Vbs3Mf4Emylt8bu9nFpjXMJSON2zsMmlqbrQHq91X4Xu0b0EFtw3ljhteliN0gJzsXCx76B2InWxxthXZMMfTvqBSUf2n4ePVGidfBiep9FP758vrm4TK6uvy4vzq8SScvUJ1VZsrSWKidMUaoQznGFWMYUo7SErEBVhmqmIK0oAoRpiRWWJRVlSRSua0rOotcH3b41jk_GOZ5mZZrSguZFIJYHojZizXurQ7s7boTm-4CxKy6s17IFzrK8qFgKlRBVxkQqaCXLvKqLAoMCpYLWp6naUG2gltB5K9qZ6PxPpxu-MlvOitBxPrb7bhKw5tcQfOUb7SS0wToww6FvSlFekoC--Qd9-HQTtRLhALpTJtSVoyg_p3nQCmXTQC0eoMJTw0aHGwelQ3yW8H6WEBgPv_1KDM7x5fdv_89e_5yzb4_YBsL4NM60wzhbbg5mB3A_nxbUvckY8XFJ7tzg45LwaUlC2qvjC7pPutsK8hcytg8u</recordid><startdate>20210222</startdate><enddate>20210222</enddate><creator>Wasson, Kerstin</creator><creator>Tanner, Karen E</creator><creator>Woofolk, Andrea</creator><creator>McCain, Sean</creator><creator>Suraci, Justin P</creator><general>Public Library of Science</general><general>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>IOV</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7952-1658</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1858-4505</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4522-6110</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20210222</creationdate><title>Top-down and sideways: Herbivory and cross-ecosystem connectivity shape restoration success at the salt marsh-upland ecotone</title><author>Wasson, Kerstin ; Tanner, Karen E ; Woofolk, Andrea ; McCain, Sean ; Suraci, Justin P</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-b9972dcf537f66f0151b0747f7669e480b40d7fe2b60e01691f1c96a993f1dd63</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Aquatic birds</topic><topic>Biological evolution</topic><topic>Biology</topic><topic>Biology and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Coastal ecosystems</topic><topic>Digital Elevation Models</topic><topic>Digital imaging</topic><topic>Domestic animals</topic><topic>Drainage</topic><topic>Earth Sciences</topic><topic>Ecological research</topic><topic>Ecological restoration</topic><topic>Ecology</topic><topic>Ecology and Environmental Sciences</topic><topic>Ecosystem biology</topic><topic>Ecosystem services</topic><topic>Editing</topic><topic>Engineering and Technology</topic><topic>Environmental aspects</topic><topic>Environmental restoration</topic><topic>Environmental studies</topic><topic>Estuaries</topic><topic>Estuarine ecosystems</topic><topic>Evolutionary biology</topic><topic>Forbs</topic><topic>Grasslands</topic><topic>Guinea pigs</topic><topic>Herbivores</topic><topic>Herbivory</topic><topic>Horses</topic><topic>Management</topic><topic>Methodology</topic><topic>Methods</topic><topic>Natural history</topic><topic>People and places</topic><topic>Planting</topic><topic>Protection and preservation</topic><topic>Research and Analysis Methods</topic><topic>Restoration</topic><topic>Reviews</topic><topic>Salt marshes</topic><topic>Sediments</topic><topic>Soil compaction</topic><topic>Soil erosion</topic><topic>Terrestrial environments</topic><topic>Tidal marshes</topic><topic>Trampling</topic><topic>Trees</topic><topic>Vegetation</topic><topic>Vegetation dynamics</topic><topic>Visualization</topic><topic>Wetland soils</topic><topic>Wetlands</topic><topic>Wildlife</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Wasson, Kerstin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tanner, Karen E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Woofolk, Andrea</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McCain, Sean</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Suraci, Justin P</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Opposing Viewpoints</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Materials Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>Access via ProQuest (Open Access)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Wasson, Kerstin</au><au>Tanner, Karen E</au><au>Woofolk, Andrea</au><au>McCain, Sean</au><au>Suraci, Justin P</au><au>Root, Karen</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Top-down and sideways: Herbivory and cross-ecosystem connectivity shape restoration success at the salt marsh-upland ecotone</atitle><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><date>2021-02-22</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>16</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>e0247374</spage><epage>e0247374</epage><pages>e0247374-e0247374</pages><issn>1932-6203</issn><eissn>1932-6203</eissn><abstract>Wetland restoration provides remarkable opportunities to understand vegetation dynamics and to inform success of future projects through rigorous restoration experiments. Salt marsh restoration typically focuses on physical factors such as sediment dynamics and elevation. Despite many demonstrations of strong top-down effects on salt marshes, the potential for consumers to affect salt marsh restoration projects has rarely been quantified. Recently, major restoration projects at the Elkhorn Slough National Estuarine Research Reserve in central California, USA provided an opportunity to examine how herbivory influences restoration success. We quantified the strength of consumer effects by comparing caged to uncaged plantings, and compared effects among plant species and sites. We used camera traps to detect which herbivores were most common and how their abundance varied spatially. Beyond characterizing consumer effects, we also tested management strategies for reducing negative effects of herbivory at the restoration sites, including caging, mowing, and acoustic playbacks of predator sounds. We found extremely strong consumer effects at sites with extensive stands of exotic forbs upland of the high marsh; uncaged restoration plants suffered heavy herbivory and high mortality, while most caged plants survived. Brush rabbits (Sylvilagus bachmani) were by far the most frequent consumers of these high marsh plants. Our work thus provides the first evidence of mammal consumers affecting salt marsh restoration success. Mowing of tall exotic forb cover adjacent to the marsh at one restoration site greatly reduced consumption, and nearly all monitored plantings survived at a second restoration site where construction had temporarily eliminated upland cover. Playbacks of predator sounds did not significantly affect restoration plantings, but restoration efforts in marsh communities vulnerable to terrestrial herbivory may benefit from concurrent restoration of predator communities in the upland habitats surrounding the marsh. A landscape approach is thus critical for recognizing linkages between terrestrial and marine vegetation.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Public Library of Science</pub><pmid>33617558</pmid><doi>10.1371/journal.pone.0247374</doi><tpages>e0247374</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7952-1658</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1858-4505</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4522-6110</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1932-6203 |
ispartof | PloS one, 2021-02, Vol.16 (2), p.e0247374-e0247374 |
issn | 1932-6203 1932-6203 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_plos_journals_2492268658 |
source | DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Public Library of Science (PLoS) Journals Open Access; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central; Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry |
subjects | Aquatic birds Biological evolution Biology Biology and Life Sciences Coastal ecosystems Digital Elevation Models Digital imaging Domestic animals Drainage Earth Sciences Ecological research Ecological restoration Ecology Ecology and Environmental Sciences Ecosystem biology Ecosystem services Editing Engineering and Technology Environmental aspects Environmental restoration Environmental studies Estuaries Estuarine ecosystems Evolutionary biology Forbs Grasslands Guinea pigs Herbivores Herbivory Horses Management Methodology Methods Natural history People and places Planting Protection and preservation Research and Analysis Methods Restoration Reviews Salt marshes Sediments Soil compaction Soil erosion Terrestrial environments Tidal marshes Trampling Trees Vegetation Vegetation dynamics Visualization Wetland soils Wetlands Wildlife |
title | Top-down and sideways: Herbivory and cross-ecosystem connectivity shape restoration success at the salt marsh-upland ecotone |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-29T01%3A47%3A31IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_plos_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Top-down%20and%20sideways:%20Herbivory%20and%20cross-ecosystem%20connectivity%20shape%20restoration%20success%20at%20the%20salt%20marsh-upland%20ecotone&rft.jtitle=PloS%20one&rft.au=Wasson,%20Kerstin&rft.date=2021-02-22&rft.volume=16&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=e0247374&rft.epage=e0247374&rft.pages=e0247374-e0247374&rft.issn=1932-6203&rft.eissn=1932-6203&rft_id=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0247374&rft_dat=%3Cgale_plos_%3EA652669352%3C/gale_plos_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2492268658&rft_id=info:pmid/33617558&rft_galeid=A652669352&rft_doaj_id=oai_doaj_org_article_7458b72ebaab47a2a6bc95bd881efeff&rfr_iscdi=true |