Comparison of the clinical performance and usefulness of five SARS-CoV-2 antibody tests

We examined the usefulness of five COVID-19 antibody detection tests using 114 serum samples at various time points from 34 Japanese COVID-19 patients. We examined Elecsys Anti-SARS-CoV-2 from Roche, and four immunochromatography tests from Hangzhou Laihe Biotech, Artron Laboratories, Chil, and Nada...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:PloS one 2021-02, Vol.16 (2), p.e0246536-e0246536
Hauptverfasser: Wakita, Mitsuru, Idei, Mayumi, Saito, Kaori, Horiuchi, Yuki, Yamatani, Kotoko, Ishikawa, Suzuka, Yamamoto, Takamasa, Igawa, Gene, Hinata, Masanobu, Kadota, Katsuhiko, Kurosawa, Taro, Takahashi, Sho, Saito, Takumi, Misawa, Shigeki, Akazawa, Chihiro, Naito, Toshio, Miida, Takashi, Takahashi, Kazuhisa, Ai, Tomohiko, Tabe, Yoko
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page e0246536
container_issue 2
container_start_page e0246536
container_title PloS one
container_volume 16
creator Wakita, Mitsuru
Idei, Mayumi
Saito, Kaori
Horiuchi, Yuki
Yamatani, Kotoko
Ishikawa, Suzuka
Yamamoto, Takamasa
Igawa, Gene
Hinata, Masanobu
Kadota, Katsuhiko
Kurosawa, Taro
Takahashi, Sho
Saito, Takumi
Misawa, Shigeki
Akazawa, Chihiro
Naito, Toshio
Miida, Takashi
Takahashi, Kazuhisa
Ai, Tomohiko
Tabe, Yoko
description We examined the usefulness of five COVID-19 antibody detection tests using 114 serum samples at various time points from 34 Japanese COVID-19 patients. We examined Elecsys Anti-SARS-CoV-2 from Roche, and four immunochromatography tests from Hangzhou Laihe Biotech, Artron Laboratories, Chil, and Nadal. In the first week after onset, Elecsys had 40% positivity in Group S (severe cases) but was negative in Group M (mild-moderate cases). The immunochromatography kits showed 40-60% and 0-8% positivity in Groups S and M, respectively. In the second week, Elecsys showed 75% and 50% positivity, and the immunochromatography tests showed 5-80% and 50-75% positivity in Groups S and M, respectively. After the third week, Elecsys showed 100% positivity in both groups. The immunochromatography kits showed 100% positivity in Group S. In Group M, positivity decreased to 50% for Chil and 75-89% for Artron and Lyher. Elecsys and immunochromatography kits had 91-100% specificity. Elecsys had comparable chronological change of cut-off index values in the two groups from the second week to the sixth week. The current SARS-CoV-2 antibody detection tests do not provide meaningful interpretation of severity and infection status. Its use might be limited to short-term epidemiological studies.
doi_str_mv 10.1371/journal.pone.0246536
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_plos_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_plos_journals_2487424759</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A651160899</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_e9f4824746a743bdbc5c9aaf99c65e82</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A651160899</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c758t-feba2a2331cbd6ca22a031e990da78a1c0f2609659fbf0c0a87d4f50837552513</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkl-L1DAUxYso7rr6DUQLguhDxzRpkvZFGAb_DCws7Oj6GG7TZCZL2swm7eJ-e1Onu0xlHyQPCcnvnJvcnCR5naNFTnj-6doNvgO72LtOLRAuGCXsSXKaVwRnDCPy9Gh9krwI4RohSkrGnicnhFDKUMlOk18r1-7Bm-C61Om036lUWtMZCTbdK6-db6GTKoWuSYeg9GA7FcKIanOr0s3ycpOt3FWGI9Gb2jV3aa9CH14mzzTYoF5N81ny8-uXH6vv2fnFt_VqeZ5JTss-06oGDJiQXNYNk4AxIJKrqkIN8BJyiTRmqGK00rVGEkHJm0JTVBJOKaY5OUveHnz31gUx9SQIXJS8wAWnVSTWB6JxcC323rTg74QDI_5uOL8V4HsjrRKq0kUZVQUDXpC6qSWVFYCuKsmoKnH0-jxVG-pWNVJ1vQc7M52fdGYntu5W8JIjVJbR4MNk4N3NEBslWhOkshY65YbDvXnBOR7Rd_-gj79uorYQH2A67WJdOZqKJaN5Hn-5GqnFI1QcjWqNjAHSJu7PBB9ngsj06ne_hSEEsd5c_j97cTVn3x-xOwW23wVnh964LszB4gBK70LwSj80OUdizP99N8SYfzHlP8reHH_Qg-g-8OQP_MD_Lg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2487424759</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison of the clinical performance and usefulness of five SARS-CoV-2 antibody tests</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Public Library of Science (PLoS) Journals Open Access</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry</source><creator>Wakita, Mitsuru ; Idei, Mayumi ; Saito, Kaori ; Horiuchi, Yuki ; Yamatani, Kotoko ; Ishikawa, Suzuka ; Yamamoto, Takamasa ; Igawa, Gene ; Hinata, Masanobu ; Kadota, Katsuhiko ; Kurosawa, Taro ; Takahashi, Sho ; Saito, Takumi ; Misawa, Shigeki ; Akazawa, Chihiro ; Naito, Toshio ; Miida, Takashi ; Takahashi, Kazuhisa ; Ai, Tomohiko ; Tabe, Yoko</creator><contributor>Roques, Pierre</contributor><creatorcontrib>Wakita, Mitsuru ; Idei, Mayumi ; Saito, Kaori ; Horiuchi, Yuki ; Yamatani, Kotoko ; Ishikawa, Suzuka ; Yamamoto, Takamasa ; Igawa, Gene ; Hinata, Masanobu ; Kadota, Katsuhiko ; Kurosawa, Taro ; Takahashi, Sho ; Saito, Takumi ; Misawa, Shigeki ; Akazawa, Chihiro ; Naito, Toshio ; Miida, Takashi ; Takahashi, Kazuhisa ; Ai, Tomohiko ; Tabe, Yoko ; Roques, Pierre</creatorcontrib><description>We examined the usefulness of five COVID-19 antibody detection tests using 114 serum samples at various time points from 34 Japanese COVID-19 patients. We examined Elecsys Anti-SARS-CoV-2 from Roche, and four immunochromatography tests from Hangzhou Laihe Biotech, Artron Laboratories, Chil, and Nadal. In the first week after onset, Elecsys had 40% positivity in Group S (severe cases) but was negative in Group M (mild-moderate cases). The immunochromatography kits showed 40-60% and 0-8% positivity in Groups S and M, respectively. In the second week, Elecsys showed 75% and 50% positivity, and the immunochromatography tests showed 5-80% and 50-75% positivity in Groups S and M, respectively. After the third week, Elecsys showed 100% positivity in both groups. The immunochromatography kits showed 100% positivity in Group S. In Group M, positivity decreased to 50% for Chil and 75-89% for Artron and Lyher. Elecsys and immunochromatography kits had 91-100% specificity. Elecsys had comparable chronological change of cut-off index values in the two groups from the second week to the sixth week. The current SARS-CoV-2 antibody detection tests do not provide meaningful interpretation of severity and infection status. Its use might be limited to short-term epidemiological studies.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0246536</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33556086</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Public Library of Science</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; Antibodies ; Antibodies, Viral - immunology ; Antigens ; Biology and life sciences ; Coronaviridae ; Coronaviruses ; COVID-19 ; COVID-19 - diagnosis ; COVID-19 - immunology ; COVID-19 - virology ; COVID-19 Serological Testing - methods ; Data analysis ; Disease ; Editing ; Electrochemiluminescence ; Emergency medical services ; FDA approval ; Female ; Gastroenterology ; Glycoproteins ; Graduate schools ; Graduate studies ; Hematology ; Hospitals ; Humans ; Immune system ; Immunoassay ; Male ; Medical equipment ; Medical innovations ; Medical laboratories ; Medical technology ; Medicine ; Medicine and Health Sciences ; Membrane proteins ; Middle Aged ; Mutation ; Nucleocapsids ; Nucleotides ; Pandemics ; Physical Sciences ; Polymerase chain reaction ; Proteins ; Reagent Kits, Diagnostic ; Regulatory agencies ; Research and Analysis Methods ; Research facilities ; Respiratory diseases ; RNA viruses ; SARS-CoV-2 - physiology ; Sensitivity and Specificity ; Serology ; Severe acute respiratory syndrome ; Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 ; Spike glycoprotein ; Structural proteins ; Testing ; University faculty ; Viral diseases ; Viral envelope proteins ; Viruses</subject><ispartof>PloS one, 2021-02, Vol.16 (2), p.e0246536-e0246536</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2021 Public Library of Science</rights><rights>2021 Wakita et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>2021 Wakita et al 2021 Wakita et al</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c758t-feba2a2331cbd6ca22a031e990da78a1c0f2609659fbf0c0a87d4f50837552513</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c758t-feba2a2331cbd6ca22a031e990da78a1c0f2609659fbf0c0a87d4f50837552513</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-0376-0227</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7870088/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7870088/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,315,728,781,785,865,886,2103,2929,23868,27926,27927,53793,53795</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33556086$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Roques, Pierre</contributor><creatorcontrib>Wakita, Mitsuru</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Idei, Mayumi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Saito, Kaori</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Horiuchi, Yuki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yamatani, Kotoko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ishikawa, Suzuka</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yamamoto, Takamasa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Igawa, Gene</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hinata, Masanobu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kadota, Katsuhiko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kurosawa, Taro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Takahashi, Sho</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Saito, Takumi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Misawa, Shigeki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Akazawa, Chihiro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Naito, Toshio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Miida, Takashi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Takahashi, Kazuhisa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ai, Tomohiko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tabe, Yoko</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of the clinical performance and usefulness of five SARS-CoV-2 antibody tests</title><title>PloS one</title><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><description>We examined the usefulness of five COVID-19 antibody detection tests using 114 serum samples at various time points from 34 Japanese COVID-19 patients. We examined Elecsys Anti-SARS-CoV-2 from Roche, and four immunochromatography tests from Hangzhou Laihe Biotech, Artron Laboratories, Chil, and Nadal. In the first week after onset, Elecsys had 40% positivity in Group S (severe cases) but was negative in Group M (mild-moderate cases). The immunochromatography kits showed 40-60% and 0-8% positivity in Groups S and M, respectively. In the second week, Elecsys showed 75% and 50% positivity, and the immunochromatography tests showed 5-80% and 50-75% positivity in Groups S and M, respectively. After the third week, Elecsys showed 100% positivity in both groups. The immunochromatography kits showed 100% positivity in Group S. In Group M, positivity decreased to 50% for Chil and 75-89% for Artron and Lyher. Elecsys and immunochromatography kits had 91-100% specificity. Elecsys had comparable chronological change of cut-off index values in the two groups from the second week to the sixth week. The current SARS-CoV-2 antibody detection tests do not provide meaningful interpretation of severity and infection status. Its use might be limited to short-term epidemiological studies.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Antibodies</subject><subject>Antibodies, Viral - immunology</subject><subject>Antigens</subject><subject>Biology and life sciences</subject><subject>Coronaviridae</subject><subject>Coronaviruses</subject><subject>COVID-19</subject><subject>COVID-19 - diagnosis</subject><subject>COVID-19 - immunology</subject><subject>COVID-19 - virology</subject><subject>COVID-19 Serological Testing - methods</subject><subject>Data analysis</subject><subject>Disease</subject><subject>Editing</subject><subject>Electrochemiluminescence</subject><subject>Emergency medical services</subject><subject>FDA approval</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Gastroenterology</subject><subject>Glycoproteins</subject><subject>Graduate schools</subject><subject>Graduate studies</subject><subject>Hematology</subject><subject>Hospitals</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Immune system</subject><subject>Immunoassay</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical equipment</subject><subject>Medical innovations</subject><subject>Medical laboratories</subject><subject>Medical technology</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine and Health Sciences</subject><subject>Membrane proteins</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Mutation</subject><subject>Nucleocapsids</subject><subject>Nucleotides</subject><subject>Pandemics</subject><subject>Physical Sciences</subject><subject>Polymerase chain reaction</subject><subject>Proteins</subject><subject>Reagent Kits, Diagnostic</subject><subject>Regulatory agencies</subject><subject>Research and Analysis Methods</subject><subject>Research facilities</subject><subject>Respiratory diseases</subject><subject>RNA viruses</subject><subject>SARS-CoV-2 - physiology</subject><subject>Sensitivity and Specificity</subject><subject>Serology</subject><subject>Severe acute respiratory syndrome</subject><subject>Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2</subject><subject>Spike glycoprotein</subject><subject>Structural proteins</subject><subject>Testing</subject><subject>University faculty</subject><subject>Viral diseases</subject><subject>Viral envelope proteins</subject><subject>Viruses</subject><issn>1932-6203</issn><issn>1932-6203</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkl-L1DAUxYso7rr6DUQLguhDxzRpkvZFGAb_DCws7Oj6GG7TZCZL2swm7eJ-e1Onu0xlHyQPCcnvnJvcnCR5naNFTnj-6doNvgO72LtOLRAuGCXsSXKaVwRnDCPy9Gh9krwI4RohSkrGnicnhFDKUMlOk18r1-7Bm-C61Om036lUWtMZCTbdK6-db6GTKoWuSYeg9GA7FcKIanOr0s3ycpOt3FWGI9Gb2jV3aa9CH14mzzTYoF5N81ny8-uXH6vv2fnFt_VqeZ5JTss-06oGDJiQXNYNk4AxIJKrqkIN8BJyiTRmqGK00rVGEkHJm0JTVBJOKaY5OUveHnz31gUx9SQIXJS8wAWnVSTWB6JxcC323rTg74QDI_5uOL8V4HsjrRKq0kUZVQUDXpC6qSWVFYCuKsmoKnH0-jxVG-pWNVJ1vQc7M52fdGYntu5W8JIjVJbR4MNk4N3NEBslWhOkshY65YbDvXnBOR7Rd_-gj79uorYQH2A67WJdOZqKJaN5Hn-5GqnFI1QcjWqNjAHSJu7PBB9ngsj06ne_hSEEsd5c_j97cTVn3x-xOwW23wVnh964LszB4gBK70LwSj80OUdizP99N8SYfzHlP8reHH_Qg-g-8OQP_MD_Lg</recordid><startdate>20210208</startdate><enddate>20210208</enddate><creator>Wakita, Mitsuru</creator><creator>Idei, Mayumi</creator><creator>Saito, Kaori</creator><creator>Horiuchi, Yuki</creator><creator>Yamatani, Kotoko</creator><creator>Ishikawa, Suzuka</creator><creator>Yamamoto, Takamasa</creator><creator>Igawa, Gene</creator><creator>Hinata, Masanobu</creator><creator>Kadota, Katsuhiko</creator><creator>Kurosawa, Taro</creator><creator>Takahashi, Sho</creator><creator>Saito, Takumi</creator><creator>Misawa, Shigeki</creator><creator>Akazawa, Chihiro</creator><creator>Naito, Toshio</creator><creator>Miida, Takashi</creator><creator>Takahashi, Kazuhisa</creator><creator>Ai, Tomohiko</creator><creator>Tabe, Yoko</creator><general>Public Library of Science</general><general>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>IOV</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>COVID</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0376-0227</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20210208</creationdate><title>Comparison of the clinical performance and usefulness of five SARS-CoV-2 antibody tests</title><author>Wakita, Mitsuru ; Idei, Mayumi ; Saito, Kaori ; Horiuchi, Yuki ; Yamatani, Kotoko ; Ishikawa, Suzuka ; Yamamoto, Takamasa ; Igawa, Gene ; Hinata, Masanobu ; Kadota, Katsuhiko ; Kurosawa, Taro ; Takahashi, Sho ; Saito, Takumi ; Misawa, Shigeki ; Akazawa, Chihiro ; Naito, Toshio ; Miida, Takashi ; Takahashi, Kazuhisa ; Ai, Tomohiko ; Tabe, Yoko</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c758t-feba2a2331cbd6ca22a031e990da78a1c0f2609659fbf0c0a87d4f50837552513</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Antibodies</topic><topic>Antibodies, Viral - immunology</topic><topic>Antigens</topic><topic>Biology and life sciences</topic><topic>Coronaviridae</topic><topic>Coronaviruses</topic><topic>COVID-19</topic><topic>COVID-19 - diagnosis</topic><topic>COVID-19 - immunology</topic><topic>COVID-19 - virology</topic><topic>COVID-19 Serological Testing - methods</topic><topic>Data analysis</topic><topic>Disease</topic><topic>Editing</topic><topic>Electrochemiluminescence</topic><topic>Emergency medical services</topic><topic>FDA approval</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Gastroenterology</topic><topic>Glycoproteins</topic><topic>Graduate schools</topic><topic>Graduate studies</topic><topic>Hematology</topic><topic>Hospitals</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Immune system</topic><topic>Immunoassay</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical equipment</topic><topic>Medical innovations</topic><topic>Medical laboratories</topic><topic>Medical technology</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine and Health Sciences</topic><topic>Membrane proteins</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Mutation</topic><topic>Nucleocapsids</topic><topic>Nucleotides</topic><topic>Pandemics</topic><topic>Physical Sciences</topic><topic>Polymerase chain reaction</topic><topic>Proteins</topic><topic>Reagent Kits, Diagnostic</topic><topic>Regulatory agencies</topic><topic>Research and Analysis Methods</topic><topic>Research facilities</topic><topic>Respiratory diseases</topic><topic>RNA viruses</topic><topic>SARS-CoV-2 - physiology</topic><topic>Sensitivity and Specificity</topic><topic>Serology</topic><topic>Severe acute respiratory syndrome</topic><topic>Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2</topic><topic>Spike glycoprotein</topic><topic>Structural proteins</topic><topic>Testing</topic><topic>University faculty</topic><topic>Viral diseases</topic><topic>Viral envelope proteins</topic><topic>Viruses</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Wakita, Mitsuru</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Idei, Mayumi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Saito, Kaori</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Horiuchi, Yuki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yamatani, Kotoko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ishikawa, Suzuka</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yamamoto, Takamasa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Igawa, Gene</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hinata, Masanobu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kadota, Katsuhiko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kurosawa, Taro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Takahashi, Sho</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Saito, Takumi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Misawa, Shigeki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Akazawa, Chihiro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Naito, Toshio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Miida, Takashi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Takahashi, Kazuhisa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ai, Tomohiko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tabe, Yoko</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Opposing Viewpoints</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Coronavirus Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Materials Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Wakita, Mitsuru</au><au>Idei, Mayumi</au><au>Saito, Kaori</au><au>Horiuchi, Yuki</au><au>Yamatani, Kotoko</au><au>Ishikawa, Suzuka</au><au>Yamamoto, Takamasa</au><au>Igawa, Gene</au><au>Hinata, Masanobu</au><au>Kadota, Katsuhiko</au><au>Kurosawa, Taro</au><au>Takahashi, Sho</au><au>Saito, Takumi</au><au>Misawa, Shigeki</au><au>Akazawa, Chihiro</au><au>Naito, Toshio</au><au>Miida, Takashi</au><au>Takahashi, Kazuhisa</au><au>Ai, Tomohiko</au><au>Tabe, Yoko</au><au>Roques, Pierre</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison of the clinical performance and usefulness of five SARS-CoV-2 antibody tests</atitle><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><date>2021-02-08</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>16</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>e0246536</spage><epage>e0246536</epage><pages>e0246536-e0246536</pages><issn>1932-6203</issn><eissn>1932-6203</eissn><abstract>We examined the usefulness of five COVID-19 antibody detection tests using 114 serum samples at various time points from 34 Japanese COVID-19 patients. We examined Elecsys Anti-SARS-CoV-2 from Roche, and four immunochromatography tests from Hangzhou Laihe Biotech, Artron Laboratories, Chil, and Nadal. In the first week after onset, Elecsys had 40% positivity in Group S (severe cases) but was negative in Group M (mild-moderate cases). The immunochromatography kits showed 40-60% and 0-8% positivity in Groups S and M, respectively. In the second week, Elecsys showed 75% and 50% positivity, and the immunochromatography tests showed 5-80% and 50-75% positivity in Groups S and M, respectively. After the third week, Elecsys showed 100% positivity in both groups. The immunochromatography kits showed 100% positivity in Group S. In Group M, positivity decreased to 50% for Chil and 75-89% for Artron and Lyher. Elecsys and immunochromatography kits had 91-100% specificity. Elecsys had comparable chronological change of cut-off index values in the two groups from the second week to the sixth week. The current SARS-CoV-2 antibody detection tests do not provide meaningful interpretation of severity and infection status. Its use might be limited to short-term epidemiological studies.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Public Library of Science</pub><pmid>33556086</pmid><doi>10.1371/journal.pone.0246536</doi><tpages>e0246536</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0376-0227</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1932-6203
ispartof PloS one, 2021-02, Vol.16 (2), p.e0246536-e0246536
issn 1932-6203
1932-6203
language eng
recordid cdi_plos_journals_2487424759
source MEDLINE; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Public Library of Science (PLoS) Journals Open Access; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central; Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry
subjects Adult
Aged
Antibodies
Antibodies, Viral - immunology
Antigens
Biology and life sciences
Coronaviridae
Coronaviruses
COVID-19
COVID-19 - diagnosis
COVID-19 - immunology
COVID-19 - virology
COVID-19 Serological Testing - methods
Data analysis
Disease
Editing
Electrochemiluminescence
Emergency medical services
FDA approval
Female
Gastroenterology
Glycoproteins
Graduate schools
Graduate studies
Hematology
Hospitals
Humans
Immune system
Immunoassay
Male
Medical equipment
Medical innovations
Medical laboratories
Medical technology
Medicine
Medicine and Health Sciences
Membrane proteins
Middle Aged
Mutation
Nucleocapsids
Nucleotides
Pandemics
Physical Sciences
Polymerase chain reaction
Proteins
Reagent Kits, Diagnostic
Regulatory agencies
Research and Analysis Methods
Research facilities
Respiratory diseases
RNA viruses
SARS-CoV-2 - physiology
Sensitivity and Specificity
Serology
Severe acute respiratory syndrome
Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2
Spike glycoprotein
Structural proteins
Testing
University faculty
Viral diseases
Viral envelope proteins
Viruses
title Comparison of the clinical performance and usefulness of five SARS-CoV-2 antibody tests
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-18T10%3A08%3A21IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_plos_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20of%20the%20clinical%20performance%20and%20usefulness%20of%20five%20SARS-CoV-2%20antibody%20tests&rft.jtitle=PloS%20one&rft.au=Wakita,%20Mitsuru&rft.date=2021-02-08&rft.volume=16&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=e0246536&rft.epage=e0246536&rft.pages=e0246536-e0246536&rft.issn=1932-6203&rft.eissn=1932-6203&rft_id=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0246536&rft_dat=%3Cgale_plos_%3EA651160899%3C/gale_plos_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2487424759&rft_id=info:pmid/33556086&rft_galeid=A651160899&rft_doaj_id=oai_doaj_org_article_e9f4824746a743bdbc5c9aaf99c65e82&rfr_iscdi=true