The Walloon farmers position differently their ideal dairy production system between a global-based intensive and a local-based extensive model of farm
Dairy farming systems are evolving. This study presents dairy producers' perceptions of their ideal future farm (IFF) to ensure revenue, and attempts to determine the reasons for this choice, the environmental aspects related to this choice, the proximity between the current farm and the IFF an...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | PloS one 2020-12, Vol.15 (12), p.e0223346-e0223346 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | e0223346 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 12 |
| container_start_page | e0223346 |
| container_title | PloS one |
| container_volume | 15 |
| creator | Dalcq, Anne-Catherine Dogot, Thomas Beckers, Yves Brostaux, Yves Froidmont, Eric Vanwindekens, Frédéric Soyeurt, Hélène |
| description | Dairy farming systems are evolving. This study presents dairy producers' perceptions of their ideal future farm (IFF) to ensure revenue, and attempts to determine the reasons for this choice, the environmental aspects related to this choice, the proximity between the current farm and the IFF and the requirements for reaching this IFF. Just before the end of the European milk quota, a total of 245 Walloon dairy producers answered a survey about the characteristics of their IFF and other socio-environmental-economic information. A multiple correspondence analysis (MCA) was carried out using seven characteristics of the IFF (intensive vs. extensive, specialised vs. diversified, strongly vs. weakly based on new technologies, managed by a group of managers vs. an independent farmer, employed vs. familial workforce, local vs. global market, standard vs. quality-differentiated production) to observe the relationships between them. Based on the main contributors to the second dimension of the MCA, this axis was defined as an IFF gradient between the local-based extensive (LBE) producers (26%) and the global-based intensive (GBI) producers (46%). The differences of IFF gradient between modalities of categorical variables were estimated using generalised linear models. Pearson correlations were calculated between the scores on the IFF gradient and quantitative variables. Finally, frequencies of IFF characteristics and the corresponding characteristic for the current situation were calculated to determine the percentages of "unhappy" producers. Some reasons for the choice of IFF by the producers have been highlighted in this study. Environmental initiatives were more valued by LBE than GBI producers. Low similarity was observed between the current farm situation of the respondents and their IFF choice. LBE and GBI producers differed significantly regarding domains of formation (technical and bureaucratic vs. transformation and diversification respectively) and paths of formation (non-market vs. market respectively). Two kinds of farming systems were considered by dairy producers and some socioeconomic and environmental components differed between them. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1371/journal.pone.0223346 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_plos_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_plos_journals_2466774863</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A643673299</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_38c3ca0794f1465192b6018b615b66bb</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A643673299</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c736t-af7a3aca78c91f196a85e1e1a98199ca4ac3ffa82d85202329e4ae4a19e2fd173</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNk9-L1DAQx4so3nn6H4gGBNGHXZukTdoX4Tj8sXBwoKc-hmk62c2RNmvSnu5f4r9rtrt33Mo9SAMNmc93ZjKZybLnNJ9TLum7Kz-GHtx87Xuc54xxXogH2TGtOZsJlvOHd_ZH2ZMYr_K85JUQj7MjzpnMBWfH2Z_LFZIf4Jz3PTEQOgyRrH20g00HrTUGA_aD25BhhTYQ2yI40oING7IOvh31BMZNHLAjDQ6_EHsCZOl8A27WQMSW2H7APtprJNC3yei8vrXh7xtb51t0xJspjafZIwMu4rP9_yT79vHD5dnn2fnFp8XZ6flMSy6GGRgJHDTIStfU0FpAVSJFCnVF61pDAZobAxVrq5LljLMaC0iL1shMSyU_yV7u_K6dj2pf06hYIYSURSV4IhY7ovVwpdbBdhA2yoNV04EPSwVhsNqh4pXmGnJZF4YWoqQ1a0ROq0bQshGiaZKv9_toY9Nhq1NlA7gDp4eW3q7U0l8rKWlByzw54DsHzuISU_DGqms2Caf96FI2WjWoGBOVYiWvS5FUb_Zhg_85YhxUZ6NG56BHP063lYJWfKrHq3_Q-2uyp5aQrm1741O2eutUnYqCC5kKXSdqfg-VvhY7q1PbGpvODwRvDwSJGVJ_LGGMUS2-fvl_9uL7Ifv6DrtKHTysonfjtnXjIVjsQB18jAHN7dPQXG2n7qYaajt1aj91Sfbi7rPeim7GjP8FJEMpfA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2466774863</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Walloon farmers position differently their ideal dairy production system between a global-based intensive and a local-based extensive model of farm</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry</source><source>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</source><creator>Dalcq, Anne-Catherine ; Dogot, Thomas ; Beckers, Yves ; Brostaux, Yves ; Froidmont, Eric ; Vanwindekens, Frédéric ; Soyeurt, Hélène</creator><creatorcontrib>Dalcq, Anne-Catherine ; Dogot, Thomas ; Beckers, Yves ; Brostaux, Yves ; Froidmont, Eric ; Vanwindekens, Frédéric ; Soyeurt, Hélène</creatorcontrib><description>Dairy farming systems are evolving. This study presents dairy producers' perceptions of their ideal future farm (IFF) to ensure revenue, and attempts to determine the reasons for this choice, the environmental aspects related to this choice, the proximity between the current farm and the IFF and the requirements for reaching this IFF. Just before the end of the European milk quota, a total of 245 Walloon dairy producers answered a survey about the characteristics of their IFF and other socio-environmental-economic information. A multiple correspondence analysis (MCA) was carried out using seven characteristics of the IFF (intensive vs. extensive, specialised vs. diversified, strongly vs. weakly based on new technologies, managed by a group of managers vs. an independent farmer, employed vs. familial workforce, local vs. global market, standard vs. quality-differentiated production) to observe the relationships between them. Based on the main contributors to the second dimension of the MCA, this axis was defined as an IFF gradient between the local-based extensive (LBE) producers (26%) and the global-based intensive (GBI) producers (46%). The differences of IFF gradient between modalities of categorical variables were estimated using generalised linear models. Pearson correlations were calculated between the scores on the IFF gradient and quantitative variables. Finally, frequencies of IFF characteristics and the corresponding characteristic for the current situation were calculated to determine the percentages of "unhappy" producers. Some reasons for the choice of IFF by the producers have been highlighted in this study. Environmental initiatives were more valued by LBE than GBI producers. Low similarity was observed between the current farm situation of the respondents and their IFF choice. LBE and GBI producers differed significantly regarding domains of formation (technical and bureaucratic vs. transformation and diversification respectively) and paths of formation (non-market vs. market respectively). Two kinds of farming systems were considered by dairy producers and some socioeconomic and environmental components differed between them.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0223346</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33270632</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Public Library of Science</publisher><subject><![CDATA[Agriculture ; Agriculture & agronomie ; Agriculture & agronomy ; Agriculture - methods ; Animal production & animal husbandry ; Animals ; Beliefs, opinions and attitudes ; Biology and Life Sciences ; Common Agricultural Policy ; dairy ; Dairy farmers ; Dairy farming ; Dairy farms ; Dairy products industry ; Dairying - methods ; Ecology and Environmental Sciences ; Economic analysis ; Engineering and Technology ; environment ; Environmental aspects ; environnement ; extensif ; Farm management ; Farmers ; Farming ; Farms ; Food ; formation ; global ; Global marketing ; Humans ; Industry forecasts ; intensif ; Internet ; lait ; laitier ; Life sciences ; local ; Medicine and Health Sciences ; Milk ; New technology ; People and Places ; Production data ; production system ; Productions animales & zootechnie ; Public opinion ; R&D ; raisons ; reasons ; Research & development ; Sciences du vivant ; Social Sciences ; Surveys and Questionnaires ; système de production ; transition]]></subject><ispartof>PloS one, 2020-12, Vol.15 (12), p.e0223346-e0223346</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2020 Public Library of Science</rights><rights>2020 Dalcq et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>2020 Dalcq et al 2020 Dalcq et al</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c736t-af7a3aca78c91f196a85e1e1a98199ca4ac3ffa82d85202329e4ae4a19e2fd173</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c736t-af7a3aca78c91f196a85e1e1a98199ca4ac3ffa82d85202329e4ae4a19e2fd173</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-3007-9680</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7714150/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7714150/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,860,881,2096,2915,23845,27901,27902,53766,53768,79342,79343</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33270632$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Dalcq, Anne-Catherine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dogot, Thomas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Beckers, Yves</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brostaux, Yves</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Froidmont, Eric</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vanwindekens, Frédéric</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Soyeurt, Hélène</creatorcontrib><title>The Walloon farmers position differently their ideal dairy production system between a global-based intensive and a local-based extensive model of farm</title><title>PloS one</title><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><description>Dairy farming systems are evolving. This study presents dairy producers' perceptions of their ideal future farm (IFF) to ensure revenue, and attempts to determine the reasons for this choice, the environmental aspects related to this choice, the proximity between the current farm and the IFF and the requirements for reaching this IFF. Just before the end of the European milk quota, a total of 245 Walloon dairy producers answered a survey about the characteristics of their IFF and other socio-environmental-economic information. A multiple correspondence analysis (MCA) was carried out using seven characteristics of the IFF (intensive vs. extensive, specialised vs. diversified, strongly vs. weakly based on new technologies, managed by a group of managers vs. an independent farmer, employed vs. familial workforce, local vs. global market, standard vs. quality-differentiated production) to observe the relationships between them. Based on the main contributors to the second dimension of the MCA, this axis was defined as an IFF gradient between the local-based extensive (LBE) producers (26%) and the global-based intensive (GBI) producers (46%). The differences of IFF gradient between modalities of categorical variables were estimated using generalised linear models. Pearson correlations were calculated between the scores on the IFF gradient and quantitative variables. Finally, frequencies of IFF characteristics and the corresponding characteristic for the current situation were calculated to determine the percentages of "unhappy" producers. Some reasons for the choice of IFF by the producers have been highlighted in this study. Environmental initiatives were more valued by LBE than GBI producers. Low similarity was observed between the current farm situation of the respondents and their IFF choice. LBE and GBI producers differed significantly regarding domains of formation (technical and bureaucratic vs. transformation and diversification respectively) and paths of formation (non-market vs. market respectively). Two kinds of farming systems were considered by dairy producers and some socioeconomic and environmental components differed between them.</description><subject>Agriculture</subject><subject>Agriculture & agronomie</subject><subject>Agriculture & agronomy</subject><subject>Agriculture - methods</subject><subject>Animal production & animal husbandry</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Beliefs, opinions and attitudes</subject><subject>Biology and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Common Agricultural Policy</subject><subject>dairy</subject><subject>Dairy farmers</subject><subject>Dairy farming</subject><subject>Dairy farms</subject><subject>Dairy products industry</subject><subject>Dairying - methods</subject><subject>Ecology and Environmental Sciences</subject><subject>Economic analysis</subject><subject>Engineering and Technology</subject><subject>environment</subject><subject>Environmental aspects</subject><subject>environnement</subject><subject>extensif</subject><subject>Farm management</subject><subject>Farmers</subject><subject>Farming</subject><subject>Farms</subject><subject>Food</subject><subject>formation</subject><subject>global</subject><subject>Global marketing</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Industry forecasts</subject><subject>intensif</subject><subject>Internet</subject><subject>lait</subject><subject>laitier</subject><subject>Life sciences</subject><subject>local</subject><subject>Medicine and Health Sciences</subject><subject>Milk</subject><subject>New technology</subject><subject>People and Places</subject><subject>Production data</subject><subject>production system</subject><subject>Productions animales & zootechnie</subject><subject>Public opinion</subject><subject>R&D</subject><subject>raisons</subject><subject>reasons</subject><subject>Research & development</subject><subject>Sciences du vivant</subject><subject>Social Sciences</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><subject>système de production</subject><subject>transition</subject><issn>1932-6203</issn><issn>1932-6203</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNqNk9-L1DAQx4so3nn6H4gGBNGHXZukTdoX4Tj8sXBwoKc-hmk62c2RNmvSnu5f4r9rtrt33Mo9SAMNmc93ZjKZybLnNJ9TLum7Kz-GHtx87Xuc54xxXogH2TGtOZsJlvOHd_ZH2ZMYr_K85JUQj7MjzpnMBWfH2Z_LFZIf4Jz3PTEQOgyRrH20g00HrTUGA_aD25BhhTYQ2yI40oING7IOvh31BMZNHLAjDQ6_EHsCZOl8A27WQMSW2H7APtprJNC3yei8vrXh7xtb51t0xJspjafZIwMu4rP9_yT79vHD5dnn2fnFp8XZ6flMSy6GGRgJHDTIStfU0FpAVSJFCnVF61pDAZobAxVrq5LljLMaC0iL1shMSyU_yV7u_K6dj2pf06hYIYSURSV4IhY7ovVwpdbBdhA2yoNV04EPSwVhsNqh4pXmGnJZF4YWoqQ1a0ROq0bQshGiaZKv9_toY9Nhq1NlA7gDp4eW3q7U0l8rKWlByzw54DsHzuISU_DGqms2Caf96FI2WjWoGBOVYiWvS5FUb_Zhg_85YhxUZ6NG56BHP063lYJWfKrHq3_Q-2uyp5aQrm1741O2eutUnYqCC5kKXSdqfg-VvhY7q1PbGpvODwRvDwSJGVJ_LGGMUS2-fvl_9uL7Ifv6DrtKHTysonfjtnXjIVjsQB18jAHN7dPQXG2n7qYaajt1aj91Sfbi7rPeim7GjP8FJEMpfA</recordid><startdate>20201203</startdate><enddate>20201203</enddate><creator>Dalcq, Anne-Catherine</creator><creator>Dogot, Thomas</creator><creator>Beckers, Yves</creator><creator>Brostaux, Yves</creator><creator>Froidmont, Eric</creator><creator>Vanwindekens, Frédéric</creator><creator>Soyeurt, Hélène</creator><general>Public Library of Science</general><general>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>IOV</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>Q33</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3007-9680</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20201203</creationdate><title>The Walloon farmers position differently their ideal dairy production system between a global-based intensive and a local-based extensive model of farm</title><author>Dalcq, Anne-Catherine ; Dogot, Thomas ; Beckers, Yves ; Brostaux, Yves ; Froidmont, Eric ; Vanwindekens, Frédéric ; Soyeurt, Hélène</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c736t-af7a3aca78c91f196a85e1e1a98199ca4ac3ffa82d85202329e4ae4a19e2fd173</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Agriculture</topic><topic>Agriculture & agronomie</topic><topic>Agriculture & agronomy</topic><topic>Agriculture - methods</topic><topic>Animal production & animal husbandry</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Beliefs, opinions and attitudes</topic><topic>Biology and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Common Agricultural Policy</topic><topic>dairy</topic><topic>Dairy farmers</topic><topic>Dairy farming</topic><topic>Dairy farms</topic><topic>Dairy products industry</topic><topic>Dairying - methods</topic><topic>Ecology and Environmental Sciences</topic><topic>Economic analysis</topic><topic>Engineering and Technology</topic><topic>environment</topic><topic>Environmental aspects</topic><topic>environnement</topic><topic>extensif</topic><topic>Farm management</topic><topic>Farmers</topic><topic>Farming</topic><topic>Farms</topic><topic>Food</topic><topic>formation</topic><topic>global</topic><topic>Global marketing</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Industry forecasts</topic><topic>intensif</topic><topic>Internet</topic><topic>lait</topic><topic>laitier</topic><topic>Life sciences</topic><topic>local</topic><topic>Medicine and Health Sciences</topic><topic>Milk</topic><topic>New technology</topic><topic>People and Places</topic><topic>Production data</topic><topic>production system</topic><topic>Productions animales & zootechnie</topic><topic>Public opinion</topic><topic>R&D</topic><topic>raisons</topic><topic>reasons</topic><topic>Research & development</topic><topic>Sciences du vivant</topic><topic>Social Sciences</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires</topic><topic>système de production</topic><topic>transition</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Dalcq, Anne-Catherine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dogot, Thomas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Beckers, Yves</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brostaux, Yves</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Froidmont, Eric</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vanwindekens, Frédéric</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Soyeurt, Hélène</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Opposing Viewpoints</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Materials Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Université de Liège - Open Repository and Bibliography (ORBI)</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Dalcq, Anne-Catherine</au><au>Dogot, Thomas</au><au>Beckers, Yves</au><au>Brostaux, Yves</au><au>Froidmont, Eric</au><au>Vanwindekens, Frédéric</au><au>Soyeurt, Hélène</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The Walloon farmers position differently their ideal dairy production system between a global-based intensive and a local-based extensive model of farm</atitle><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><date>2020-12-03</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>15</volume><issue>12</issue><spage>e0223346</spage><epage>e0223346</epage><pages>e0223346-e0223346</pages><issn>1932-6203</issn><eissn>1932-6203</eissn><abstract>Dairy farming systems are evolving. This study presents dairy producers' perceptions of their ideal future farm (IFF) to ensure revenue, and attempts to determine the reasons for this choice, the environmental aspects related to this choice, the proximity between the current farm and the IFF and the requirements for reaching this IFF. Just before the end of the European milk quota, a total of 245 Walloon dairy producers answered a survey about the characteristics of their IFF and other socio-environmental-economic information. A multiple correspondence analysis (MCA) was carried out using seven characteristics of the IFF (intensive vs. extensive, specialised vs. diversified, strongly vs. weakly based on new technologies, managed by a group of managers vs. an independent farmer, employed vs. familial workforce, local vs. global market, standard vs. quality-differentiated production) to observe the relationships between them. Based on the main contributors to the second dimension of the MCA, this axis was defined as an IFF gradient between the local-based extensive (LBE) producers (26%) and the global-based intensive (GBI) producers (46%). The differences of IFF gradient between modalities of categorical variables were estimated using generalised linear models. Pearson correlations were calculated between the scores on the IFF gradient and quantitative variables. Finally, frequencies of IFF characteristics and the corresponding characteristic for the current situation were calculated to determine the percentages of "unhappy" producers. Some reasons for the choice of IFF by the producers have been highlighted in this study. Environmental initiatives were more valued by LBE than GBI producers. Low similarity was observed between the current farm situation of the respondents and their IFF choice. LBE and GBI producers differed significantly regarding domains of formation (technical and bureaucratic vs. transformation and diversification respectively) and paths of formation (non-market vs. market respectively). Two kinds of farming systems were considered by dairy producers and some socioeconomic and environmental components differed between them.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Public Library of Science</pub><pmid>33270632</pmid><doi>10.1371/journal.pone.0223346</doi><tpages>e0223346</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3007-9680</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 1932-6203 |
| ispartof | PloS one, 2020-12, Vol.15 (12), p.e0223346-e0223346 |
| issn | 1932-6203 1932-6203 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_plos_journals_2466774863 |
| source | MEDLINE; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; PubMed Central; Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry; Public Library of Science (PLoS) |
| subjects | Agriculture Agriculture & agronomie Agriculture & agronomy Agriculture - methods Animal production & animal husbandry Animals Beliefs, opinions and attitudes Biology and Life Sciences Common Agricultural Policy dairy Dairy farmers Dairy farming Dairy farms Dairy products industry Dairying - methods Ecology and Environmental Sciences Economic analysis Engineering and Technology environment Environmental aspects environnement extensif Farm management Farmers Farming Farms Food formation global Global marketing Humans Industry forecasts intensif Internet lait laitier Life sciences local Medicine and Health Sciences Milk New technology People and Places Production data production system Productions animales & zootechnie Public opinion R&D raisons reasons Research & development Sciences du vivant Social Sciences Surveys and Questionnaires système de production transition |
| title | The Walloon farmers position differently their ideal dairy production system between a global-based intensive and a local-based extensive model of farm |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-05T14%3A30%3A17IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_plos_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Walloon%20farmers%20position%20differently%20their%20ideal%20dairy%20production%20system%20between%20a%20global-based%20intensive%20and%20a%20local-based%20extensive%20model%20of%20farm&rft.jtitle=PloS%20one&rft.au=Dalcq,%20Anne-Catherine&rft.date=2020-12-03&rft.volume=15&rft.issue=12&rft.spage=e0223346&rft.epage=e0223346&rft.pages=e0223346-e0223346&rft.issn=1932-6203&rft.eissn=1932-6203&rft_id=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0223346&rft_dat=%3Cgale_plos_%3EA643673299%3C/gale_plos_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2466774863&rft_id=info:pmid/33270632&rft_galeid=A643673299&rft_doaj_id=oai_doaj_org_article_38c3ca0794f1465192b6018b615b66bb&rfr_iscdi=true |