A Rasch analysis of the Burnout Assessment Tool (BAT)

Burnout as a concept indicative of a work-related state of mental exhaustion is recognized around the globe. Numerous studies showed that burnout has negative consequences for both individuals and organizations but also for society at large, especially in welfare states where sickness absence and wo...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:PloS one 2020-11, Vol.15 (11), p.e0242241-e0242241
Hauptverfasser: Hadžibajramović, Emina, Schaufeli, Wilmar, De Witte, Hans
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page e0242241
container_issue 11
container_start_page e0242241
container_title PloS one
container_volume 15
creator Hadžibajramović, Emina
Schaufeli, Wilmar
De Witte, Hans
description Burnout as a concept indicative of a work-related state of mental exhaustion is recognized around the globe. Numerous studies showed that burnout has negative consequences for both individuals and organizations but also for society at large, especially in welfare states where sickness absence and work incapacitation are covered by social funds. This underlines the importance of a valid and reliable tool that can be used to assess employee burnout levels. Although the Maslach Burnout Inventory is by far the most frequently used questionnaire for assessing burnout, it is associated with several shortcomings and has been criticized on theoretical as well as empirical grounds. Thus, there is a need for an alternative questionnaire with a strong conceptual basis and proper psychometric qualities. This challenge has been taken up by introducing the Burnout Assessment Tool (BAT), according to which burnout is conceived as a work-related state of exhaustion among employees, characterized by extreme tiredness, reduced ability to regulate cognitive and emotional processes, and mental distancing. Given that the BAT is a new measure of burnout, its psychometric properties need to be evaluated. This paper focuses on an evaluation of the internal construct validity of the BAT using Rasch analysis in two random samples (n = 800, each) drawn from larger representative samples of the working population of the Netherlands and Flanders (Belgium). The BAT has sound psychometric properties and fulfils the measurement criteria according to the Rasch model. The BAT score reflects the scoring structure indicated by the developers of the scale and the BAT's four subscales can be summarized into a single burnout score. The BAT score also works invariantly for women and men, younger and older respondents, and across both countries. Hence, the BAT can be used in organizations for screening and identifying employees who are at risk of burnout.
doi_str_mv 10.1371/journal.pone.0242241
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_plos_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_plos_journals_2464160845</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A642711534</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_37e52778385343fa90c77c550e970a73</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A642711534</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c730t-1124d5469ac3af4150dae7da8bd6854aa8ad2e0ed166183538d024f2901dbd033</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNk11v0zAUhiMEYqPwDxBEQkLbRYs_Y_cGqZv4qDRp0ijcWqe2k6ZK4y4nAfbvcWg2NWgXyBexTp7z-rzHPknympIZ5Yp-2IauqaGa7UPtZ4QJxgR9kpzSOWfTjBH-9Gh_krxA3BIiuc6y58kJ5ywuyU4TuUhvAO0mhah1hyWmIU_bjU8vonro2nSB6BF3vm7TVQhVenaxWJ2_TJ7lUKF_NXwnyffPn1aXX6dX11-Wl4urqVWctFNKmXBSZHOwHHJBJXHglQO9dpmWAkCDY554R7OMah6rc9FIzuaEurUjnE-StwfdfRXQDI7RMJEJmhEtZCSWB8IF2Jp9U-6guTMBSvM3EJrCQNOWtvKGKy-ZUppryQXPYU6sUlZK4ueKgOpPmx608Jffd-uRWtHtTQwVncGoRGKZNPIfh-q69c47G3vUQDVKG_-py40pwk-jeveKRYGzQaAJt53H1uxKtL6qoPahG3xqTbiO6Lt_0Me7MVAFRMNlnYd4ru1FzSITTFHaW58ks0eouJzflTY-p7yM8VHC-SghMq3_3RbQIZrlt5v_Z69_jNn3R-zGQ9VuMFRdW4Yax6A4gLYJiI3PH5pMiemn4b4bpp8GM0xDTHtzfEEPSffPn_8BKhkAlw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2464160845</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A Rasch analysis of the Burnout Assessment Tool (BAT)</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry</source><creator>Hadžibajramović, Emina ; Schaufeli, Wilmar ; De Witte, Hans</creator><contributor>Hoefer, Stefan</contributor><creatorcontrib>Hadžibajramović, Emina ; Schaufeli, Wilmar ; De Witte, Hans ; Hoefer, Stefan</creatorcontrib><description>Burnout as a concept indicative of a work-related state of mental exhaustion is recognized around the globe. Numerous studies showed that burnout has negative consequences for both individuals and organizations but also for society at large, especially in welfare states where sickness absence and work incapacitation are covered by social funds. This underlines the importance of a valid and reliable tool that can be used to assess employee burnout levels. Although the Maslach Burnout Inventory is by far the most frequently used questionnaire for assessing burnout, it is associated with several shortcomings and has been criticized on theoretical as well as empirical grounds. Thus, there is a need for an alternative questionnaire with a strong conceptual basis and proper psychometric qualities. This challenge has been taken up by introducing the Burnout Assessment Tool (BAT), according to which burnout is conceived as a work-related state of exhaustion among employees, characterized by extreme tiredness, reduced ability to regulate cognitive and emotional processes, and mental distancing. Given that the BAT is a new measure of burnout, its psychometric properties need to be evaluated. This paper focuses on an evaluation of the internal construct validity of the BAT using Rasch analysis in two random samples (n = 800, each) drawn from larger representative samples of the working population of the Netherlands and Flanders (Belgium). The BAT has sound psychometric properties and fulfils the measurement criteria according to the Rasch model. The BAT score reflects the scoring structure indicated by the developers of the scale and the BAT's four subscales can be summarized into a single burnout score. The BAT score also works invariantly for women and men, younger and older respondents, and across both countries. Hence, the BAT can be used in organizations for screening and identifying employees who are at risk of burnout.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0242241</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33232352</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Public Library of Science</publisher><subject>Adult ; Analysis ; Belgium - epidemiology ; Biology and Life Sciences ; Burnout ; Burnout, Psychological - epidemiology ; Burnout, Psychological - pathology ; Cognition &amp; reasoning ; Cognitive ability ; Demographic aspects ; Empirical analysis ; Employees ; Evaluation ; Exhaustion ; Factor Analysis, Statistical ; Female ; Folkhälsovetenskap, global hälsa, socialmedicin och epidemiologi ; Humans ; Male ; measurement model ; Medicine and Health Sciences ; Middle Aged ; Netherlands - epidemiology ; Occupational health ; Organizations ; People and places ; Public Health, Global Health, Social Medicine and Epidemiology ; Quantitative psychology ; Questionnaires ; Rasch model ; scales ; Science &amp; Technology - Other Topics ; Social Sciences ; Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><ispartof>PloS one, 2020-11, Vol.15 (11), p.e0242241-e0242241</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2020 Public Library of Science</rights><rights>2020 Hadžibajramović et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>2020 Hadžibajramović et al 2020 Hadžibajramović et al</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c730t-1124d5469ac3af4150dae7da8bd6854aa8ad2e0ed166183538d024f2901dbd033</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c730t-1124d5469ac3af4150dae7da8bd6854aa8ad2e0ed166183538d024f2901dbd033</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-6630-8898</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7685472/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7685472/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,864,885,2100,2926,23865,27923,27924,53790,53792,79371,79372</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33232352$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://gup.ub.gu.se/publication/300241$$DView record from Swedish Publication Index$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Hoefer, Stefan</contributor><creatorcontrib>Hadžibajramović, Emina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schaufeli, Wilmar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>De Witte, Hans</creatorcontrib><title>A Rasch analysis of the Burnout Assessment Tool (BAT)</title><title>PloS one</title><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><description>Burnout as a concept indicative of a work-related state of mental exhaustion is recognized around the globe. Numerous studies showed that burnout has negative consequences for both individuals and organizations but also for society at large, especially in welfare states where sickness absence and work incapacitation are covered by social funds. This underlines the importance of a valid and reliable tool that can be used to assess employee burnout levels. Although the Maslach Burnout Inventory is by far the most frequently used questionnaire for assessing burnout, it is associated with several shortcomings and has been criticized on theoretical as well as empirical grounds. Thus, there is a need for an alternative questionnaire with a strong conceptual basis and proper psychometric qualities. This challenge has been taken up by introducing the Burnout Assessment Tool (BAT), according to which burnout is conceived as a work-related state of exhaustion among employees, characterized by extreme tiredness, reduced ability to regulate cognitive and emotional processes, and mental distancing. Given that the BAT is a new measure of burnout, its psychometric properties need to be evaluated. This paper focuses on an evaluation of the internal construct validity of the BAT using Rasch analysis in two random samples (n = 800, each) drawn from larger representative samples of the working population of the Netherlands and Flanders (Belgium). The BAT has sound psychometric properties and fulfils the measurement criteria according to the Rasch model. The BAT score reflects the scoring structure indicated by the developers of the scale and the BAT's four subscales can be summarized into a single burnout score. The BAT score also works invariantly for women and men, younger and older respondents, and across both countries. Hence, the BAT can be used in organizations for screening and identifying employees who are at risk of burnout.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>Belgium - epidemiology</subject><subject>Biology and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Burnout</subject><subject>Burnout, Psychological - epidemiology</subject><subject>Burnout, Psychological - pathology</subject><subject>Cognition &amp; reasoning</subject><subject>Cognitive ability</subject><subject>Demographic aspects</subject><subject>Empirical analysis</subject><subject>Employees</subject><subject>Evaluation</subject><subject>Exhaustion</subject><subject>Factor Analysis, Statistical</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Folkhälsovetenskap, global hälsa, socialmedicin och epidemiologi</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>measurement model</subject><subject>Medicine and Health Sciences</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Netherlands - epidemiology</subject><subject>Occupational health</subject><subject>Organizations</subject><subject>People and places</subject><subject>Public Health, Global Health, Social Medicine and Epidemiology</subject><subject>Quantitative psychology</subject><subject>Questionnaires</subject><subject>Rasch model</subject><subject>scales</subject><subject>Science &amp; Technology - Other Topics</subject><subject>Social Sciences</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><issn>1932-6203</issn><issn>1932-6203</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNqNk11v0zAUhiMEYqPwDxBEQkLbRYs_Y_cGqZv4qDRp0ijcWqe2k6ZK4y4nAfbvcWg2NWgXyBexTp7z-rzHPknympIZ5Yp-2IauqaGa7UPtZ4QJxgR9kpzSOWfTjBH-9Gh_krxA3BIiuc6y58kJ5ywuyU4TuUhvAO0mhah1hyWmIU_bjU8vonro2nSB6BF3vm7TVQhVenaxWJ2_TJ7lUKF_NXwnyffPn1aXX6dX11-Wl4urqVWctFNKmXBSZHOwHHJBJXHglQO9dpmWAkCDY554R7OMah6rc9FIzuaEurUjnE-StwfdfRXQDI7RMJEJmhEtZCSWB8IF2Jp9U-6guTMBSvM3EJrCQNOWtvKGKy-ZUppryQXPYU6sUlZK4ueKgOpPmx608Jffd-uRWtHtTQwVncGoRGKZNPIfh-q69c47G3vUQDVKG_-py40pwk-jeveKRYGzQaAJt53H1uxKtL6qoPahG3xqTbiO6Lt_0Me7MVAFRMNlnYd4ru1FzSITTFHaW58ks0eouJzflTY-p7yM8VHC-SghMq3_3RbQIZrlt5v_Z69_jNn3R-zGQ9VuMFRdW4Yax6A4gLYJiI3PH5pMiemn4b4bpp8GM0xDTHtzfEEPSffPn_8BKhkAlw</recordid><startdate>20201124</startdate><enddate>20201124</enddate><creator>Hadžibajramović, Emina</creator><creator>Schaufeli, Wilmar</creator><creator>De Witte, Hans</creator><general>Public Library of Science</general><general>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>IOV</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>ADTPV</scope><scope>AOWAS</scope><scope>F1U</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6630-8898</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20201124</creationdate><title>A Rasch analysis of the Burnout Assessment Tool (BAT)</title><author>Hadžibajramović, Emina ; Schaufeli, Wilmar ; De Witte, Hans</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c730t-1124d5469ac3af4150dae7da8bd6854aa8ad2e0ed166183538d024f2901dbd033</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>Belgium - epidemiology</topic><topic>Biology and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Burnout</topic><topic>Burnout, Psychological - epidemiology</topic><topic>Burnout, Psychological - pathology</topic><topic>Cognition &amp; reasoning</topic><topic>Cognitive ability</topic><topic>Demographic aspects</topic><topic>Empirical analysis</topic><topic>Employees</topic><topic>Evaluation</topic><topic>Exhaustion</topic><topic>Factor Analysis, Statistical</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Folkhälsovetenskap, global hälsa, socialmedicin och epidemiologi</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>measurement model</topic><topic>Medicine and Health Sciences</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Netherlands - epidemiology</topic><topic>Occupational health</topic><topic>Organizations</topic><topic>People and places</topic><topic>Public Health, Global Health, Social Medicine and Epidemiology</topic><topic>Quantitative psychology</topic><topic>Questionnaires</topic><topic>Rasch model</topic><topic>scales</topic><topic>Science &amp; Technology - Other Topics</topic><topic>Social Sciences</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hadžibajramović, Emina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schaufeli, Wilmar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>De Witte, Hans</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Opposing Viewpoints</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Materials Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>SwePub</collection><collection>SwePub Articles</collection><collection>SWEPUB Göteborgs universitet</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hadžibajramović, Emina</au><au>Schaufeli, Wilmar</au><au>De Witte, Hans</au><au>Hoefer, Stefan</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A Rasch analysis of the Burnout Assessment Tool (BAT)</atitle><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><date>2020-11-24</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>15</volume><issue>11</issue><spage>e0242241</spage><epage>e0242241</epage><pages>e0242241-e0242241</pages><issn>1932-6203</issn><eissn>1932-6203</eissn><abstract>Burnout as a concept indicative of a work-related state of mental exhaustion is recognized around the globe. Numerous studies showed that burnout has negative consequences for both individuals and organizations but also for society at large, especially in welfare states where sickness absence and work incapacitation are covered by social funds. This underlines the importance of a valid and reliable tool that can be used to assess employee burnout levels. Although the Maslach Burnout Inventory is by far the most frequently used questionnaire for assessing burnout, it is associated with several shortcomings and has been criticized on theoretical as well as empirical grounds. Thus, there is a need for an alternative questionnaire with a strong conceptual basis and proper psychometric qualities. This challenge has been taken up by introducing the Burnout Assessment Tool (BAT), according to which burnout is conceived as a work-related state of exhaustion among employees, characterized by extreme tiredness, reduced ability to regulate cognitive and emotional processes, and mental distancing. Given that the BAT is a new measure of burnout, its psychometric properties need to be evaluated. This paper focuses on an evaluation of the internal construct validity of the BAT using Rasch analysis in two random samples (n = 800, each) drawn from larger representative samples of the working population of the Netherlands and Flanders (Belgium). The BAT has sound psychometric properties and fulfils the measurement criteria according to the Rasch model. The BAT score reflects the scoring structure indicated by the developers of the scale and the BAT's four subscales can be summarized into a single burnout score. The BAT score also works invariantly for women and men, younger and older respondents, and across both countries. Hence, the BAT can be used in organizations for screening and identifying employees who are at risk of burnout.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Public Library of Science</pub><pmid>33232352</pmid><doi>10.1371/journal.pone.0242241</doi><tpages>e0242241</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6630-8898</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1932-6203
ispartof PloS one, 2020-11, Vol.15 (11), p.e0242241-e0242241
issn 1932-6203
1932-6203
language eng
recordid cdi_plos_journals_2464160845
source MEDLINE; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Public Library of Science (PLoS); EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central; Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry
subjects Adult
Analysis
Belgium - epidemiology
Biology and Life Sciences
Burnout
Burnout, Psychological - epidemiology
Burnout, Psychological - pathology
Cognition & reasoning
Cognitive ability
Demographic aspects
Empirical analysis
Employees
Evaluation
Exhaustion
Factor Analysis, Statistical
Female
Folkhälsovetenskap, global hälsa, socialmedicin och epidemiologi
Humans
Male
measurement model
Medicine and Health Sciences
Middle Aged
Netherlands - epidemiology
Occupational health
Organizations
People and places
Public Health, Global Health, Social Medicine and Epidemiology
Quantitative psychology
Questionnaires
Rasch model
scales
Science & Technology - Other Topics
Social Sciences
Surveys and Questionnaires
title A Rasch analysis of the Burnout Assessment Tool (BAT)
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-12T22%3A40%3A41IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_plos_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20Rasch%20analysis%20of%20the%20Burnout%20Assessment%20Tool%20(BAT)&rft.jtitle=PloS%20one&rft.au=Had%C5%BEibajramovi%C4%87,%20Emina&rft.date=2020-11-24&rft.volume=15&rft.issue=11&rft.spage=e0242241&rft.epage=e0242241&rft.pages=e0242241-e0242241&rft.issn=1932-6203&rft.eissn=1932-6203&rft_id=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0242241&rft_dat=%3Cgale_plos_%3EA642711534%3C/gale_plos_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2464160845&rft_id=info:pmid/33232352&rft_galeid=A642711534&rft_doaj_id=oai_doaj_org_article_37e52778385343fa90c77c550e970a73&rfr_iscdi=true