A community-based validation of the International Alliance for the Control of Scabies Consensus Criteria by expert and non-expert examiners in Liberia

The International Alliance for the Control of Scabies (IACS) recently published expert consensus criteria for scabies diagnosis. Formal validation of these criteria is needed to guide implementation. We conducted a study to provide detailed description of the morphology and distribution of scabies l...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:PLoS neglected tropical diseases 2020-10, Vol.14 (10), p.e0008717-e0008717
Hauptverfasser: Walker, Stephen L, Collinson, Shelui, Timothy, Joseph, Zayzay, Samuel K, Kollie, Karsor K, Candy, Neima, Lebas, Eglantine, Halliday, Katherine, Pullan, Rachel, Fallah, Mosoka, Marks, Michael
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page e0008717
container_issue 10
container_start_page e0008717
container_title PLoS neglected tropical diseases
container_volume 14
creator Walker, Stephen L
Collinson, Shelui
Timothy, Joseph
Zayzay, Samuel K
Kollie, Karsor K
Candy, Neima
Lebas, Eglantine
Halliday, Katherine
Pullan, Rachel
Fallah, Mosoka
Marks, Michael
description The International Alliance for the Control of Scabies (IACS) recently published expert consensus criteria for scabies diagnosis. Formal validation of these criteria is needed to guide implementation. We conducted a study to provide detailed description of the morphology and distribution of scabies lesions as assessed by dermatologists and validate the IACS criteria for diagnosis by both expert and non-expert examiners. Participants from a community in Monrovia, Liberia, were independently assessed by two dermatologists and six non-expert examiners. Lesion morphology and distribution were documented based on the dermatologist examination. Diagnoses were classified by IACS criteria and the sensitivity and specificity of non-expert examiner assessments calculated. Papules were the most common lesions (97.8%). Burrows were found in just under half (46.7%) and dermatoscopy was positive in a minority (13.3%). Scabies lesions were found in all body regions but more than 90% of patients could have been diagnosed by an examination of only the limbs. Severity of itch was associated with lesion number (p = 0.003). The sensitivity of non-expert examiners to detect typical scabies ranged between 69-83% and specificity 70-96%. The sensitivity of non-expert examiners was higher in more extensive disease (78-94%). The IACS criteria proved a valid tool for scabies diagnosis. For the purposes of implementation papules and burrows represent truly 'typical' scabies lesions. Non-expert examiners are able to diagnose scabies with a high degree of accuracy, demonstrating they could form a key component in population-level control strategies.
doi_str_mv 10.1371/journal.pntd.0008717
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_plos_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_plos_journals_2460998248</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A645327456</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_42827040137949a19b1c1056e8945cfc</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A645327456</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c624t-538ef6aec16067dd94a71cd79eb8b584e765e40d547c0db17e8330a367e26fa3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkt9q2zAUxs3YWLtubzA2wWDsxplky5J8UwhhfwKFXaz3QpaPEwVZyiS7NC-y553cuCUZRReWj37fd3SOTpa9J3hBSk6-7vwYnLKLvRvaBcZYcMJfZJekLqu84GX18mR_kb2JcYdxVVeCvM4uyhITTgt2mf1dIu37fnRmOOSNitCiO2VNqwbjHfIdGraA1m6AlGsKKYuW1hrlNKDOh4fjlXdD8Haif2vVGIhTKIKLY9oFk8RGoeaA4H4PYUDKtch5l8-_cK964yBEZBy6Mc1Ev81edcpGeDd_r7Lb799uVz_zm18_1qvlTa5ZQYe8KgV0TIEmDDPetjVVnOiW19CIphIUOKuA4raiXOO2IRxEKl2VjEPBOlVeZR-Ptnvro5w7GmVBGa5rUVCRiPWRaL3ayX0wvQoH6ZWRDwEfNlKFwWgLkhai4Jji9Do1rRWpG6IJrhiImla608nres42Nj20GlLblD0zPT9xZis3_k5yXhapvmTwZTYI_s8IcZC9iRqsVQ78ON2bCkGZICShn_5Dn69upjYqFWBc51NePZnKJaNVWXBasUQtnqHSaqE32jvoTIqfCT6fCLag7LCN3o7TAMVzkB5BHXyMAbqnZhAspyl_vLWcplzOU55kH04b-SR6HOvyH78v-lc</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2460998248</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A community-based validation of the International Alliance for the Control of Scabies Consensus Criteria by expert and non-expert examiners in Liberia</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>PubMed Central Open Access</source><source>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Walker, Stephen L ; Collinson, Shelui ; Timothy, Joseph ; Zayzay, Samuel K ; Kollie, Karsor K ; Candy, Neima ; Lebas, Eglantine ; Halliday, Katherine ; Pullan, Rachel ; Fallah, Mosoka ; Marks, Michael</creator><contributor>Mumcuoglu, Kosta Y.</contributor><creatorcontrib>Walker, Stephen L ; Collinson, Shelui ; Timothy, Joseph ; Zayzay, Samuel K ; Kollie, Karsor K ; Candy, Neima ; Lebas, Eglantine ; Halliday, Katherine ; Pullan, Rachel ; Fallah, Mosoka ; Marks, Michael ; Mumcuoglu, Kosta Y.</creatorcontrib><description>The International Alliance for the Control of Scabies (IACS) recently published expert consensus criteria for scabies diagnosis. Formal validation of these criteria is needed to guide implementation. We conducted a study to provide detailed description of the morphology and distribution of scabies lesions as assessed by dermatologists and validate the IACS criteria for diagnosis by both expert and non-expert examiners. Participants from a community in Monrovia, Liberia, were independently assessed by two dermatologists and six non-expert examiners. Lesion morphology and distribution were documented based on the dermatologist examination. Diagnoses were classified by IACS criteria and the sensitivity and specificity of non-expert examiner assessments calculated. Papules were the most common lesions (97.8%). Burrows were found in just under half (46.7%) and dermatoscopy was positive in a minority (13.3%). Scabies lesions were found in all body regions but more than 90% of patients could have been diagnosed by an examination of only the limbs. Severity of itch was associated with lesion number (p = 0.003). The sensitivity of non-expert examiners to detect typical scabies ranged between 69-83% and specificity 70-96%. The sensitivity of non-expert examiners was higher in more extensive disease (78-94%). The IACS criteria proved a valid tool for scabies diagnosis. For the purposes of implementation papules and burrows represent truly 'typical' scabies lesions. Non-expert examiners are able to diagnose scabies with a high degree of accuracy, demonstrating they could form a key component in population-level control strategies.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1935-2735</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1935-2727</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1935-2735</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0008717</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33017426</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Public Library of Science</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Adult ; Biology and Life Sciences ; Body regions ; Burrowing organisms ; Burrows ; Care and treatment ; Child ; Criteria ; Dermatology ; Dermoscopy - methods ; Diagnosis ; Diagnostic Tests, Routine - methods ; Disease control ; Distribution ; Female ; Humans ; Hygiene ; Lesions ; Liberia ; Low income groups ; Male ; Medical care ; Medicine ; Medicine and Health Sciences ; Methods ; Morphology ; Public health ; Public health administration ; Quality management ; Scabies ; Scabies - diagnosis ; Sensitivity and Specificity ; Skin ; Skin diseases ; Social Sciences ; Specificity ; Supervision ; Tropical diseases ; Zoobenthos</subject><ispartof>PLoS neglected tropical diseases, 2020-10, Vol.14 (10), p.e0008717-e0008717</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2020 Public Library of Science</rights><rights>2020 Walker et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>2020 Walker et al 2020 Walker et al</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c624t-538ef6aec16067dd94a71cd79eb8b584e765e40d547c0db17e8330a367e26fa3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c624t-538ef6aec16067dd94a71cd79eb8b584e765e40d547c0db17e8330a367e26fa3</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-5307-2823 ; 0000-0002-2034-8376 ; 0000-0002-6699-0620 ; 0000-0002-7585-4743 ; 0000-0003-3857-773X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7732067/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7732067/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,724,777,781,861,882,2096,2915,23847,27905,27906,53772,53774,79349,79350</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33017426$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Mumcuoglu, Kosta Y.</contributor><creatorcontrib>Walker, Stephen L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Collinson, Shelui</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Timothy, Joseph</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zayzay, Samuel K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kollie, Karsor K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Candy, Neima</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lebas, Eglantine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Halliday, Katherine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pullan, Rachel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fallah, Mosoka</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marks, Michael</creatorcontrib><title>A community-based validation of the International Alliance for the Control of Scabies Consensus Criteria by expert and non-expert examiners in Liberia</title><title>PLoS neglected tropical diseases</title><addtitle>PLoS Negl Trop Dis</addtitle><description>The International Alliance for the Control of Scabies (IACS) recently published expert consensus criteria for scabies diagnosis. Formal validation of these criteria is needed to guide implementation. We conducted a study to provide detailed description of the morphology and distribution of scabies lesions as assessed by dermatologists and validate the IACS criteria for diagnosis by both expert and non-expert examiners. Participants from a community in Monrovia, Liberia, were independently assessed by two dermatologists and six non-expert examiners. Lesion morphology and distribution were documented based on the dermatologist examination. Diagnoses were classified by IACS criteria and the sensitivity and specificity of non-expert examiner assessments calculated. Papules were the most common lesions (97.8%). Burrows were found in just under half (46.7%) and dermatoscopy was positive in a minority (13.3%). Scabies lesions were found in all body regions but more than 90% of patients could have been diagnosed by an examination of only the limbs. Severity of itch was associated with lesion number (p = 0.003). The sensitivity of non-expert examiners to detect typical scabies ranged between 69-83% and specificity 70-96%. The sensitivity of non-expert examiners was higher in more extensive disease (78-94%). The IACS criteria proved a valid tool for scabies diagnosis. For the purposes of implementation papules and burrows represent truly 'typical' scabies lesions. Non-expert examiners are able to diagnose scabies with a high degree of accuracy, demonstrating they could form a key component in population-level control strategies.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Biology and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Body regions</subject><subject>Burrowing organisms</subject><subject>Burrows</subject><subject>Care and treatment</subject><subject>Child</subject><subject>Criteria</subject><subject>Dermatology</subject><subject>Dermoscopy - methods</subject><subject>Diagnosis</subject><subject>Diagnostic Tests, Routine - methods</subject><subject>Disease control</subject><subject>Distribution</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Hygiene</subject><subject>Lesions</subject><subject>Liberia</subject><subject>Low income groups</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical care</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine and Health Sciences</subject><subject>Methods</subject><subject>Morphology</subject><subject>Public health</subject><subject>Public health administration</subject><subject>Quality management</subject><subject>Scabies</subject><subject>Scabies - diagnosis</subject><subject>Sensitivity and Specificity</subject><subject>Skin</subject><subject>Skin diseases</subject><subject>Social Sciences</subject><subject>Specificity</subject><subject>Supervision</subject><subject>Tropical diseases</subject><subject>Zoobenthos</subject><issn>1935-2735</issn><issn>1935-2727</issn><issn>1935-2735</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNptkt9q2zAUxs3YWLtubzA2wWDsxplky5J8UwhhfwKFXaz3QpaPEwVZyiS7NC-y553cuCUZRReWj37fd3SOTpa9J3hBSk6-7vwYnLKLvRvaBcZYcMJfZJekLqu84GX18mR_kb2JcYdxVVeCvM4uyhITTgt2mf1dIu37fnRmOOSNitCiO2VNqwbjHfIdGraA1m6AlGsKKYuW1hrlNKDOh4fjlXdD8Haif2vVGIhTKIKLY9oFk8RGoeaA4H4PYUDKtch5l8-_cK964yBEZBy6Mc1Ev81edcpGeDd_r7Lb799uVz_zm18_1qvlTa5ZQYe8KgV0TIEmDDPetjVVnOiW19CIphIUOKuA4raiXOO2IRxEKl2VjEPBOlVeZR-Ptnvro5w7GmVBGa5rUVCRiPWRaL3ayX0wvQoH6ZWRDwEfNlKFwWgLkhai4Jji9Do1rRWpG6IJrhiImla608nres42Nj20GlLblD0zPT9xZis3_k5yXhapvmTwZTYI_s8IcZC9iRqsVQ78ON2bCkGZICShn_5Dn69upjYqFWBc51NePZnKJaNVWXBasUQtnqHSaqE32jvoTIqfCT6fCLag7LCN3o7TAMVzkB5BHXyMAbqnZhAspyl_vLWcplzOU55kH04b-SR6HOvyH78v-lc</recordid><startdate>20201001</startdate><enddate>20201001</enddate><creator>Walker, Stephen L</creator><creator>Collinson, Shelui</creator><creator>Timothy, Joseph</creator><creator>Zayzay, Samuel K</creator><creator>Kollie, Karsor K</creator><creator>Candy, Neima</creator><creator>Lebas, Eglantine</creator><creator>Halliday, Katherine</creator><creator>Pullan, Rachel</creator><creator>Fallah, Mosoka</creator><creator>Marks, Michael</creator><general>Public Library of Science</general><general>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T2</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>H97</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5307-2823</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2034-8376</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6699-0620</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7585-4743</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3857-773X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20201001</creationdate><title>A community-based validation of the International Alliance for the Control of Scabies Consensus Criteria by expert and non-expert examiners in Liberia</title><author>Walker, Stephen L ; Collinson, Shelui ; Timothy, Joseph ; Zayzay, Samuel K ; Kollie, Karsor K ; Candy, Neima ; Lebas, Eglantine ; Halliday, Katherine ; Pullan, Rachel ; Fallah, Mosoka ; Marks, Michael</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c624t-538ef6aec16067dd94a71cd79eb8b584e765e40d547c0db17e8330a367e26fa3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Biology and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Body regions</topic><topic>Burrowing organisms</topic><topic>Burrows</topic><topic>Care and treatment</topic><topic>Child</topic><topic>Criteria</topic><topic>Dermatology</topic><topic>Dermoscopy - methods</topic><topic>Diagnosis</topic><topic>Diagnostic Tests, Routine - methods</topic><topic>Disease control</topic><topic>Distribution</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Hygiene</topic><topic>Lesions</topic><topic>Liberia</topic><topic>Low income groups</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical care</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine and Health Sciences</topic><topic>Methods</topic><topic>Morphology</topic><topic>Public health</topic><topic>Public health administration</topic><topic>Quality management</topic><topic>Scabies</topic><topic>Scabies - diagnosis</topic><topic>Sensitivity and Specificity</topic><topic>Skin</topic><topic>Skin diseases</topic><topic>Social Sciences</topic><topic>Specificity</topic><topic>Supervision</topic><topic>Tropical diseases</topic><topic>Zoobenthos</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Walker, Stephen L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Collinson, Shelui</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Timothy, Joseph</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zayzay, Samuel K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kollie, Karsor K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Candy, Neima</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lebas, Eglantine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Halliday, Katherine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pullan, Rachel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fallah, Mosoka</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marks, Michael</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Health and Safety Science Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health and Medical</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences &amp; Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 3: Aquatic Pollution &amp; Environmental Quality</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>PLoS neglected tropical diseases</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Walker, Stephen L</au><au>Collinson, Shelui</au><au>Timothy, Joseph</au><au>Zayzay, Samuel K</au><au>Kollie, Karsor K</au><au>Candy, Neima</au><au>Lebas, Eglantine</au><au>Halliday, Katherine</au><au>Pullan, Rachel</au><au>Fallah, Mosoka</au><au>Marks, Michael</au><au>Mumcuoglu, Kosta Y.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A community-based validation of the International Alliance for the Control of Scabies Consensus Criteria by expert and non-expert examiners in Liberia</atitle><jtitle>PLoS neglected tropical diseases</jtitle><addtitle>PLoS Negl Trop Dis</addtitle><date>2020-10-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>14</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>e0008717</spage><epage>e0008717</epage><pages>e0008717-e0008717</pages><issn>1935-2735</issn><issn>1935-2727</issn><eissn>1935-2735</eissn><abstract>The International Alliance for the Control of Scabies (IACS) recently published expert consensus criteria for scabies diagnosis. Formal validation of these criteria is needed to guide implementation. We conducted a study to provide detailed description of the morphology and distribution of scabies lesions as assessed by dermatologists and validate the IACS criteria for diagnosis by both expert and non-expert examiners. Participants from a community in Monrovia, Liberia, were independently assessed by two dermatologists and six non-expert examiners. Lesion morphology and distribution were documented based on the dermatologist examination. Diagnoses were classified by IACS criteria and the sensitivity and specificity of non-expert examiner assessments calculated. Papules were the most common lesions (97.8%). Burrows were found in just under half (46.7%) and dermatoscopy was positive in a minority (13.3%). Scabies lesions were found in all body regions but more than 90% of patients could have been diagnosed by an examination of only the limbs. Severity of itch was associated with lesion number (p = 0.003). The sensitivity of non-expert examiners to detect typical scabies ranged between 69-83% and specificity 70-96%. The sensitivity of non-expert examiners was higher in more extensive disease (78-94%). The IACS criteria proved a valid tool for scabies diagnosis. For the purposes of implementation papules and burrows represent truly 'typical' scabies lesions. Non-expert examiners are able to diagnose scabies with a high degree of accuracy, demonstrating they could form a key component in population-level control strategies.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Public Library of Science</pub><pmid>33017426</pmid><doi>10.1371/journal.pntd.0008717</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5307-2823</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2034-8376</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6699-0620</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7585-4743</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3857-773X</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1935-2735
ispartof PLoS neglected tropical diseases, 2020-10, Vol.14 (10), p.e0008717-e0008717
issn 1935-2735
1935-2727
1935-2735
language eng
recordid cdi_plos_journals_2460998248
source MEDLINE; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; PubMed Central Open Access; Public Library of Science (PLoS); EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central
subjects Adolescent
Adult
Biology and Life Sciences
Body regions
Burrowing organisms
Burrows
Care and treatment
Child
Criteria
Dermatology
Dermoscopy - methods
Diagnosis
Diagnostic Tests, Routine - methods
Disease control
Distribution
Female
Humans
Hygiene
Lesions
Liberia
Low income groups
Male
Medical care
Medicine
Medicine and Health Sciences
Methods
Morphology
Public health
Public health administration
Quality management
Scabies
Scabies - diagnosis
Sensitivity and Specificity
Skin
Skin diseases
Social Sciences
Specificity
Supervision
Tropical diseases
Zoobenthos
title A community-based validation of the International Alliance for the Control of Scabies Consensus Criteria by expert and non-expert examiners in Liberia
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-18T00%3A59%3A10IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_plos_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20community-based%20validation%20of%20the%20International%20Alliance%20for%20the%20Control%20of%20Scabies%20Consensus%20Criteria%20by%20expert%20and%20non-expert%20examiners%20in%20Liberia&rft.jtitle=PLoS%20neglected%20tropical%20diseases&rft.au=Walker,%20Stephen%20L&rft.date=2020-10-01&rft.volume=14&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=e0008717&rft.epage=e0008717&rft.pages=e0008717-e0008717&rft.issn=1935-2735&rft.eissn=1935-2735&rft_id=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pntd.0008717&rft_dat=%3Cgale_plos_%3EA645327456%3C/gale_plos_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2460998248&rft_id=info:pmid/33017426&rft_galeid=A645327456&rft_doaj_id=oai_doaj_org_article_42827040137949a19b1c1056e8945cfc&rfr_iscdi=true