Using interpersonal communication strategies to encourage science conversations on social media
Today, many science communicators are using social media to share scientific information with citizens, but, as research has shown, fostering conversational exchanges remains a challenge. This largely qualitative study investigated the communication strategies applied by individual scientists and en...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | PloS one 2020-11, Vol.15 (11), p.e0241972-e0241972 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | e0241972 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 11 |
| container_start_page | e0241972 |
| container_title | PloS one |
| container_volume | 15 |
| creator | Martin, Curtis MacDonald, Bertrum H |
| description | Today, many science communicators are using social media to share scientific information with citizens, but, as research has shown, fostering conversational exchanges remains a challenge. This largely qualitative study investigated the communication strategies applied by individual scientists and environmental non-governmental organizations on Twitter and Instagram to determine whether particular social media practices encourage two-way conversations between science communicators and citizens. Data from Twitter and Instagram posts, interviews with the communicators, and a survey of audience members were triangulated to identify emergent communication strategies and the resulting engagement; provide insight into why particular practices are employed by communicators; and explain why audiences choose to participate in social media conversations with communicators. The results demonstrate that the application of interpersonal communication strategies encourage conversational engagement, in terms of the number of comments and unique individuals involved in conversations. In particular, using selfies (images and videos), non-scientific content, first person pronoun-rich captions, and responding to comments result in the formation of communicator-audience relationships, encouraging two-way conversations on social media. Furthermore, the results indicate that Instagram more readily supports the implementation of interpersonal communication strategies than Twitter, making Instagram the preferred platform for promoting conversational exchanges. These findings can be applicable to diverse communicators, subjects, audiences, and environments (online and offline) in initiatives to promote awareness and understanding of science. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1371/journal.pone.0241972 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_plos_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_plos_journals_2459277975</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A641142902</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_0771d18010ef4fc6bfa14025c210eaf9</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A641142902</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-bd653a9ef447b11f49afb22acf0e1f53827a9e8c371504adec42cef4c2fd79243</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNk12L1DAUhoso7of-A9GCIHoxY5KmzfRGWBY_BhYW1PU2ZNKTToY2GZN00X-_Z2a6y1T2QnrRNnne93wkJ8teUTKnhaAfN34ITnXzrXcwJ4zTWrAn2SmtCzarGCmeHn2fZGcxbggpi0VVPc9OioIKsijL00zeROva3LoEYQsherTMte_7wVmtkvUujymoBK2FmCefg9MYWLWQR23xB5B2t6jcwzHfCby26NJDY9WL7JlRXYSX4_s8u_ny-eflt9nV9dfl5cXVTFc1S7NVU5WFqsFwLlaUGl4rs2JMaUOAGkybCdxdaCy8JFw1oDnTSGtmGlEzXpxnbw6-285HOfYmSsbLmglRixKJ5YFovNrIbbC9Cn-lV1buF3xopQrJ6g4kEYI2dEEowRBGVyujKCes1AxXlKnR69MYbVhhmRoc9qibmE53nF3L1t9KUZVc1BUavB8Ngv89QEyyt1FD1ykHfjjkXbFCsF3eb_9BH69upFqFBVhnPMbVO1N5UXFKOasJQ2r-CIVPA73FcwRjcX0i-DARIJPgT2rVEKNc_vj-_-z1ryn77ohdg-rSOvpu2N-hKcgPoA4-xgDmocmUyN0c3HdD7uZAjnOAstfHB_Qgur_4xR1AHwSH</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2459277975</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Using interpersonal communication strategies to encourage science conversations on social media</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Public Library of Science (PLoS) Journals Open Access</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry</source><creator>Martin, Curtis ; MacDonald, Bertrum H</creator><contributor>Mehmood, Rashid</contributor><creatorcontrib>Martin, Curtis ; MacDonald, Bertrum H ; Mehmood, Rashid</creatorcontrib><description>Today, many science communicators are using social media to share scientific information with citizens, but, as research has shown, fostering conversational exchanges remains a challenge. This largely qualitative study investigated the communication strategies applied by individual scientists and environmental non-governmental organizations on Twitter and Instagram to determine whether particular social media practices encourage two-way conversations between science communicators and citizens. Data from Twitter and Instagram posts, interviews with the communicators, and a survey of audience members were triangulated to identify emergent communication strategies and the resulting engagement; provide insight into why particular practices are employed by communicators; and explain why audiences choose to participate in social media conversations with communicators. The results demonstrate that the application of interpersonal communication strategies encourage conversational engagement, in terms of the number of comments and unique individuals involved in conversations. In particular, using selfies (images and videos), non-scientific content, first person pronoun-rich captions, and responding to comments result in the formation of communicator-audience relationships, encouraging two-way conversations on social media. Furthermore, the results indicate that Instagram more readily supports the implementation of interpersonal communication strategies than Twitter, making Instagram the preferred platform for promoting conversational exchanges. These findings can be applicable to diverse communicators, subjects, audiences, and environments (online and offline) in initiatives to promote awareness and understanding of science.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0241972</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33170855</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Public Library of Science</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Adult ; Aged ; Amnesties ; Audiences ; Biology and Life Sciences ; Business communications ; Child ; Child, Preschool ; Climate change ; Communication ; Computer and Information Sciences ; Digital media ; Female ; Humans ; Internet access ; Interpersonal communication ; Literacy ; Male ; Methods ; Middle Aged ; NGOs ; Nongovernmental organizations ; Nonprofit organizations ; Organizations - statistics & numerical data ; People and Places ; Personal communication ; Qualitative Research ; Research and Analysis Methods ; Researchers ; Science Policy ; Scientific communication ; Scientists ; Social media ; Social Media - statistics & numerical data ; Social networks ; Social research ; Social Sciences ; Social Skills ; Verbal communication ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>PloS one, 2020-11, Vol.15 (11), p.e0241972-e0241972</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2020 Public Library of Science</rights><rights>2020 Martin, MacDonald. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>2020 Martin, MacDonald 2020 Martin, MacDonald</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-bd653a9ef447b11f49afb22acf0e1f53827a9e8c371504adec42cef4c2fd79243</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-bd653a9ef447b11f49afb22acf0e1f53827a9e8c371504adec42cef4c2fd79243</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-1015-5535</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7654796/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7654796/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,864,885,2102,2928,23866,27924,27925,53791,53793,79600,79601</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33170855$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Mehmood, Rashid</contributor><creatorcontrib>Martin, Curtis</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MacDonald, Bertrum H</creatorcontrib><title>Using interpersonal communication strategies to encourage science conversations on social media</title><title>PloS one</title><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><description>Today, many science communicators are using social media to share scientific information with citizens, but, as research has shown, fostering conversational exchanges remains a challenge. This largely qualitative study investigated the communication strategies applied by individual scientists and environmental non-governmental organizations on Twitter and Instagram to determine whether particular social media practices encourage two-way conversations between science communicators and citizens. Data from Twitter and Instagram posts, interviews with the communicators, and a survey of audience members were triangulated to identify emergent communication strategies and the resulting engagement; provide insight into why particular practices are employed by communicators; and explain why audiences choose to participate in social media conversations with communicators. The results demonstrate that the application of interpersonal communication strategies encourage conversational engagement, in terms of the number of comments and unique individuals involved in conversations. In particular, using selfies (images and videos), non-scientific content, first person pronoun-rich captions, and responding to comments result in the formation of communicator-audience relationships, encouraging two-way conversations on social media. Furthermore, the results indicate that Instagram more readily supports the implementation of interpersonal communication strategies than Twitter, making Instagram the preferred platform for promoting conversational exchanges. These findings can be applicable to diverse communicators, subjects, audiences, and environments (online and offline) in initiatives to promote awareness and understanding of science.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Amnesties</subject><subject>Audiences</subject><subject>Biology and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Business communications</subject><subject>Child</subject><subject>Child, Preschool</subject><subject>Climate change</subject><subject>Communication</subject><subject>Computer and Information Sciences</subject><subject>Digital media</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Internet access</subject><subject>Interpersonal communication</subject><subject>Literacy</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Methods</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>NGOs</subject><subject>Nongovernmental organizations</subject><subject>Nonprofit organizations</subject><subject>Organizations - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>People and Places</subject><subject>Personal communication</subject><subject>Qualitative Research</subject><subject>Research and Analysis Methods</subject><subject>Researchers</subject><subject>Science Policy</subject><subject>Scientific communication</subject><subject>Scientists</subject><subject>Social media</subject><subject>Social Media - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Social networks</subject><subject>Social research</subject><subject>Social Sciences</subject><subject>Social Skills</subject><subject>Verbal communication</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>1932-6203</issn><issn>1932-6203</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNqNk12L1DAUhoso7of-A9GCIHoxY5KmzfRGWBY_BhYW1PU2ZNKTToY2GZN00X-_Z2a6y1T2QnrRNnne93wkJ8teUTKnhaAfN34ITnXzrXcwJ4zTWrAn2SmtCzarGCmeHn2fZGcxbggpi0VVPc9OioIKsijL00zeROva3LoEYQsherTMte_7wVmtkvUujymoBK2FmCefg9MYWLWQR23xB5B2t6jcwzHfCby26NJDY9WL7JlRXYSX4_s8u_ny-eflt9nV9dfl5cXVTFc1S7NVU5WFqsFwLlaUGl4rs2JMaUOAGkybCdxdaCy8JFw1oDnTSGtmGlEzXpxnbw6-285HOfYmSsbLmglRixKJ5YFovNrIbbC9Cn-lV1buF3xopQrJ6g4kEYI2dEEowRBGVyujKCes1AxXlKnR69MYbVhhmRoc9qibmE53nF3L1t9KUZVc1BUavB8Ngv89QEyyt1FD1ykHfjjkXbFCsF3eb_9BH69upFqFBVhnPMbVO1N5UXFKOasJQ2r-CIVPA73FcwRjcX0i-DARIJPgT2rVEKNc_vj-_-z1ryn77ohdg-rSOvpu2N-hKcgPoA4-xgDmocmUyN0c3HdD7uZAjnOAstfHB_Qgur_4xR1AHwSH</recordid><startdate>20201110</startdate><enddate>20201110</enddate><creator>Martin, Curtis</creator><creator>MacDonald, Bertrum H</creator><general>Public Library of Science</general><general>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>IOV</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1015-5535</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20201110</creationdate><title>Using interpersonal communication strategies to encourage science conversations on social media</title><author>Martin, Curtis ; MacDonald, Bertrum H</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-bd653a9ef447b11f49afb22acf0e1f53827a9e8c371504adec42cef4c2fd79243</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Amnesties</topic><topic>Audiences</topic><topic>Biology and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Business communications</topic><topic>Child</topic><topic>Child, Preschool</topic><topic>Climate change</topic><topic>Communication</topic><topic>Computer and Information Sciences</topic><topic>Digital media</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Internet access</topic><topic>Interpersonal communication</topic><topic>Literacy</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Methods</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>NGOs</topic><topic>Nongovernmental organizations</topic><topic>Nonprofit organizations</topic><topic>Organizations - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>People and Places</topic><topic>Personal communication</topic><topic>Qualitative Research</topic><topic>Research and Analysis Methods</topic><topic>Researchers</topic><topic>Science Policy</topic><topic>Scientific communication</topic><topic>Scientists</topic><topic>Social media</topic><topic>Social Media - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Social networks</topic><topic>Social research</topic><topic>Social Sciences</topic><topic>Social Skills</topic><topic>Verbal communication</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Martin, Curtis</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MacDonald, Bertrum H</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Opposing Viewpoints</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Materials Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>Access via ProQuest (Open Access)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Martin, Curtis</au><au>MacDonald, Bertrum H</au><au>Mehmood, Rashid</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Using interpersonal communication strategies to encourage science conversations on social media</atitle><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><date>2020-11-10</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>15</volume><issue>11</issue><spage>e0241972</spage><epage>e0241972</epage><pages>e0241972-e0241972</pages><issn>1932-6203</issn><eissn>1932-6203</eissn><abstract>Today, many science communicators are using social media to share scientific information with citizens, but, as research has shown, fostering conversational exchanges remains a challenge. This largely qualitative study investigated the communication strategies applied by individual scientists and environmental non-governmental organizations on Twitter and Instagram to determine whether particular social media practices encourage two-way conversations between science communicators and citizens. Data from Twitter and Instagram posts, interviews with the communicators, and a survey of audience members were triangulated to identify emergent communication strategies and the resulting engagement; provide insight into why particular practices are employed by communicators; and explain why audiences choose to participate in social media conversations with communicators. The results demonstrate that the application of interpersonal communication strategies encourage conversational engagement, in terms of the number of comments and unique individuals involved in conversations. In particular, using selfies (images and videos), non-scientific content, first person pronoun-rich captions, and responding to comments result in the formation of communicator-audience relationships, encouraging two-way conversations on social media. Furthermore, the results indicate that Instagram more readily supports the implementation of interpersonal communication strategies than Twitter, making Instagram the preferred platform for promoting conversational exchanges. These findings can be applicable to diverse communicators, subjects, audiences, and environments (online and offline) in initiatives to promote awareness and understanding of science.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Public Library of Science</pub><pmid>33170855</pmid><doi>10.1371/journal.pone.0241972</doi><tpages>e0241972</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1015-5535</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 1932-6203 |
| ispartof | PloS one, 2020-11, Vol.15 (11), p.e0241972-e0241972 |
| issn | 1932-6203 1932-6203 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_plos_journals_2459277975 |
| source | MEDLINE; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Public Library of Science (PLoS) Journals Open Access; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central; Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry |
| subjects | Adolescent Adult Aged Amnesties Audiences Biology and Life Sciences Business communications Child Child, Preschool Climate change Communication Computer and Information Sciences Digital media Female Humans Internet access Interpersonal communication Literacy Male Methods Middle Aged NGOs Nongovernmental organizations Nonprofit organizations Organizations - statistics & numerical data People and Places Personal communication Qualitative Research Research and Analysis Methods Researchers Science Policy Scientific communication Scientists Social media Social Media - statistics & numerical data Social networks Social research Social Sciences Social Skills Verbal communication Young Adult |
| title | Using interpersonal communication strategies to encourage science conversations on social media |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-02T18%3A00%3A30IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_plos_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Using%20interpersonal%20communication%20strategies%20to%20encourage%20science%20conversations%20on%20social%20media&rft.jtitle=PloS%20one&rft.au=Martin,%20Curtis&rft.date=2020-11-10&rft.volume=15&rft.issue=11&rft.spage=e0241972&rft.epage=e0241972&rft.pages=e0241972-e0241972&rft.issn=1932-6203&rft.eissn=1932-6203&rft_id=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0241972&rft_dat=%3Cgale_plos_%3EA641142902%3C/gale_plos_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2459277975&rft_id=info:pmid/33170855&rft_galeid=A641142902&rft_doaj_id=oai_doaj_org_article_0771d18010ef4fc6bfa14025c210eaf9&rfr_iscdi=true |