Localized prediction of tissue outcome in acute ischemic stroke patients using diffusion- and perfusion-weighted MRI datasets

An accurate prediction of tissue outcome in acute ischemic stroke patients is of high interest for treatment decision making. To date, various machine learning models have been proposed that combine multi-parametric imaging data for this purpose. However, most of these machine learning models were t...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:PloS one 2020-11, Vol.15 (11), p.e0241917
Hauptverfasser: Grosser, Malte, Gellißen, Susanne, Borchert, Patrick, Sedlacik, Jan, Nawabi, Jawed, Fiehler, Jens, Forkert, Nils D
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 11
container_start_page e0241917
container_title PloS one
container_volume 15
creator Grosser, Malte
Gellißen, Susanne
Borchert, Patrick
Sedlacik, Jan
Nawabi, Jawed
Fiehler, Jens
Forkert, Nils D
description An accurate prediction of tissue outcome in acute ischemic stroke patients is of high interest for treatment decision making. To date, various machine learning models have been proposed that combine multi-parametric imaging data for this purpose. However, most of these machine learning models were trained using voxel information extracted from the whole brain, without taking differences in susceptibility to ischemia into account that exist between brain regions. The aim of this study was to develop and evaluate a local tissue outcome prediction approach, which makes predictions using locally trained machine learning models and thus accounts for regional differences. Multi-parametric MRI data from 99 acute ischemic stroke patients were used for the development and evaluation of the local tissue outcome prediction approach. Diffusion (ADC) and perfusion parameter maps (CBF, CBV, MTT, Tmax) and corresponding follow-up lesion masks for each patient were registered to the MNI brain atlas. Logistic regression (LR) and random forest (RF) models were trained employing a local approach, which makes predictions using models individually trained for each specific voxel position using the corresponding local data. A global approach, which uses a single model trained using all voxels of the brain, was used for comparison. Tissue outcome predictions resulting from the global and local RF and LR models, as well as a combined (hybrid) approach were quantitatively evaluated and compared using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC AUC), the Dice coefficient, and the sensitivity and specificity metrics. Statistical analysis revealed the highest ROC AUC and Dice values for the hybrid approach. With 0.872 (ROC AUC; LR) and 0.353 (Dice; RF), these values were significantly higher (p < 0.01) than the values of the two other approaches. In addition, the local approach achieved the highest sensitivity of 0.448 (LR). Overall, the hybrid approach was only outperformed in sensitivity (LR) by the local approach and in specificity by both other approaches. However, in these cases the effect sizes were comparatively small. The results of this study suggest that using locally trained machine learning models can lead to better lesion outcome prediction results compared to a single global machine learning model trained using all voxel information independent of the location in the brain.
doi_str_mv 10.1371/journal.pone.0241917
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_plos_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_plos_journals_2457964357</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A640707194</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_8c7b226ae8984febabc595d15ad996fa</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A640707194</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-70a9f19d350986143364cf5b1444a5f870d32672b051331afde467034ee1a53d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNk9tu1DAQhiMEoqXwBggiISG42MWO7SS-QaoqDistqlQOt9bEHu-6ZOMldjhJvDveblptUC9QLjJxvvnH89uTZY8pmVNW0VeXfug7aOdb3-GcFJxKWt3JjqlkxawsCLt7EB9lD0K4JESwuizvZ0eMUVEQLo6zP0uvoXW_0eTbHo3T0fku9zaPLoQBcz9E7TeYuy4HPcQUBL3GjdN5iL3_ivkWosMuhnwIrlvlxlmbIt_NcuiSJvbj5w90q3VMZT5cLHIDEQLG8DC7Z6EN-Gh8n2Sf3775dPZ-tjx_tzg7Xc50KYs4qwhIS6Vhgsi6pJyxkmsrGso5B2HrihhWlFXREEFTa2AN8rIijCNSEMywk-zpXnfb-qBG54IquKhkyZmoErHYE8bDpdr2bgP9L-XBqasF368U9NHpFlWtq6YoSsBa1txiA40WUhgqwEhZWkhar8dqQ7NBo5M9PbQT0emfzq3Vyn9XVdqLlCIJvBgFev9twBDVJtmObQsd-uFq33XqTtQsoc_-QW_vbqRWkBpwnfWprt6JqtOSk4pUVPJEzW-h0mN2B56umXVpfZLwcpKQmIg_4wqGENTi48X_s-dfpuzzA3aN0MZ18O2wu5thCvI9qHsfQo_2xmRK1G5Krt1QuylR45SktCeHB3STdD0W7C_DjA3R</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2457964357</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Localized prediction of tissue outcome in acute ischemic stroke patients using diffusion- and perfusion-weighted MRI datasets</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry</source><source>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</source><creator>Grosser, Malte ; Gellißen, Susanne ; Borchert, Patrick ; Sedlacik, Jan ; Nawabi, Jawed ; Fiehler, Jens ; Forkert, Nils D</creator><contributor>Jiang, Quan</contributor><creatorcontrib>Grosser, Malte ; Gellißen, Susanne ; Borchert, Patrick ; Sedlacik, Jan ; Nawabi, Jawed ; Fiehler, Jens ; Forkert, Nils D ; Jiang, Quan</creatorcontrib><description>An accurate prediction of tissue outcome in acute ischemic stroke patients is of high interest for treatment decision making. To date, various machine learning models have been proposed that combine multi-parametric imaging data for this purpose. However, most of these machine learning models were trained using voxel information extracted from the whole brain, without taking differences in susceptibility to ischemia into account that exist between brain regions. The aim of this study was to develop and evaluate a local tissue outcome prediction approach, which makes predictions using locally trained machine learning models and thus accounts for regional differences. Multi-parametric MRI data from 99 acute ischemic stroke patients were used for the development and evaluation of the local tissue outcome prediction approach. Diffusion (ADC) and perfusion parameter maps (CBF, CBV, MTT, Tmax) and corresponding follow-up lesion masks for each patient were registered to the MNI brain atlas. Logistic regression (LR) and random forest (RF) models were trained employing a local approach, which makes predictions using models individually trained for each specific voxel position using the corresponding local data. A global approach, which uses a single model trained using all voxels of the brain, was used for comparison. Tissue outcome predictions resulting from the global and local RF and LR models, as well as a combined (hybrid) approach were quantitatively evaluated and compared using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC AUC), the Dice coefficient, and the sensitivity and specificity metrics. Statistical analysis revealed the highest ROC AUC and Dice values for the hybrid approach. With 0.872 (ROC AUC; LR) and 0.353 (Dice; RF), these values were significantly higher (p &lt; 0.01) than the values of the two other approaches. In addition, the local approach achieved the highest sensitivity of 0.448 (LR). Overall, the hybrid approach was only outperformed in sensitivity (LR) by the local approach and in specificity by both other approaches. However, in these cases the effect sizes were comparatively small. The results of this study suggest that using locally trained machine learning models can lead to better lesion outcome prediction results compared to a single global machine learning model trained using all voxel information independent of the location in the brain.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0241917</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33152045</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Public Library of Science</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; Area Under Curve ; Biology and Life Sciences ; Blood ; Brain ; Brain - physiopathology ; Brain Ischemia - physiopathology ; Cerebrospinal fluid ; Computer and Information Sciences ; Datasets ; Decision making ; Decision trees ; Development and progression ; Diagnosis ; Diffusion ; Diffusion Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods ; Female ; Forecasting - methods ; Forecasts and trends ; Gene mapping ; Health aspects ; Humans ; Ischemia ; Ischemic Stroke - diagnostic imaging ; Learning algorithms ; Lesions ; Logistic Models ; Machine Learning ; Magnetic Resonance Angiography - methods ; Magnetic resonance imaging ; Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods ; Male ; Medicine and Health Sciences ; Middle Aged ; Neuroimaging ; Patient outcomes ; Perfusion ; Physical Sciences ; Predictions ; Prognosis ; Regression analysis ; Research and Analysis Methods ; ROC Curve ; Sensitivity and Specificity ; Statistical analysis ; Stroke ; Stroke - physiopathology ; Tissues</subject><ispartof>PloS one, 2020-11, Vol.15 (11), p.e0241917</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2020 Public Library of Science</rights><rights>2020 Grosser et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>2020 Grosser et al 2020 Grosser et al</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-70a9f19d350986143364cf5b1444a5f870d32672b051331afde467034ee1a53d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-70a9f19d350986143364cf5b1444a5f870d32672b051331afde467034ee1a53d3</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-7139-3284</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7643995/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7643995/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,860,881,2096,2915,23845,27901,27902,53766,53768,79343,79344</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33152045$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Jiang, Quan</contributor><creatorcontrib>Grosser, Malte</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gellißen, Susanne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Borchert, Patrick</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sedlacik, Jan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nawabi, Jawed</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fiehler, Jens</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Forkert, Nils D</creatorcontrib><title>Localized prediction of tissue outcome in acute ischemic stroke patients using diffusion- and perfusion-weighted MRI datasets</title><title>PloS one</title><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><description>An accurate prediction of tissue outcome in acute ischemic stroke patients is of high interest for treatment decision making. To date, various machine learning models have been proposed that combine multi-parametric imaging data for this purpose. However, most of these machine learning models were trained using voxel information extracted from the whole brain, without taking differences in susceptibility to ischemia into account that exist between brain regions. The aim of this study was to develop and evaluate a local tissue outcome prediction approach, which makes predictions using locally trained machine learning models and thus accounts for regional differences. Multi-parametric MRI data from 99 acute ischemic stroke patients were used for the development and evaluation of the local tissue outcome prediction approach. Diffusion (ADC) and perfusion parameter maps (CBF, CBV, MTT, Tmax) and corresponding follow-up lesion masks for each patient were registered to the MNI brain atlas. Logistic regression (LR) and random forest (RF) models were trained employing a local approach, which makes predictions using models individually trained for each specific voxel position using the corresponding local data. A global approach, which uses a single model trained using all voxels of the brain, was used for comparison. Tissue outcome predictions resulting from the global and local RF and LR models, as well as a combined (hybrid) approach were quantitatively evaluated and compared using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC AUC), the Dice coefficient, and the sensitivity and specificity metrics. Statistical analysis revealed the highest ROC AUC and Dice values for the hybrid approach. With 0.872 (ROC AUC; LR) and 0.353 (Dice; RF), these values were significantly higher (p &lt; 0.01) than the values of the two other approaches. In addition, the local approach achieved the highest sensitivity of 0.448 (LR). Overall, the hybrid approach was only outperformed in sensitivity (LR) by the local approach and in specificity by both other approaches. However, in these cases the effect sizes were comparatively small. The results of this study suggest that using locally trained machine learning models can lead to better lesion outcome prediction results compared to a single global machine learning model trained using all voxel information independent of the location in the brain.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Area Under Curve</subject><subject>Biology and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Blood</subject><subject>Brain</subject><subject>Brain - physiopathology</subject><subject>Brain Ischemia - physiopathology</subject><subject>Cerebrospinal fluid</subject><subject>Computer and Information Sciences</subject><subject>Datasets</subject><subject>Decision making</subject><subject>Decision trees</subject><subject>Development and progression</subject><subject>Diagnosis</subject><subject>Diffusion</subject><subject>Diffusion Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Forecasting - methods</subject><subject>Forecasts and trends</subject><subject>Gene mapping</subject><subject>Health aspects</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Ischemia</subject><subject>Ischemic Stroke - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Learning algorithms</subject><subject>Lesions</subject><subject>Logistic Models</subject><subject>Machine Learning</subject><subject>Magnetic Resonance Angiography - methods</subject><subject>Magnetic resonance imaging</subject><subject>Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medicine and Health Sciences</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Neuroimaging</subject><subject>Patient outcomes</subject><subject>Perfusion</subject><subject>Physical Sciences</subject><subject>Predictions</subject><subject>Prognosis</subject><subject>Regression analysis</subject><subject>Research and Analysis Methods</subject><subject>ROC Curve</subject><subject>Sensitivity and Specificity</subject><subject>Statistical analysis</subject><subject>Stroke</subject><subject>Stroke - physiopathology</subject><subject>Tissues</subject><issn>1932-6203</issn><issn>1932-6203</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNqNk9tu1DAQhiMEoqXwBggiISG42MWO7SS-QaoqDistqlQOt9bEHu-6ZOMldjhJvDveblptUC9QLjJxvvnH89uTZY8pmVNW0VeXfug7aOdb3-GcFJxKWt3JjqlkxawsCLt7EB9lD0K4JESwuizvZ0eMUVEQLo6zP0uvoXW_0eTbHo3T0fku9zaPLoQBcz9E7TeYuy4HPcQUBL3GjdN5iL3_ivkWosMuhnwIrlvlxlmbIt_NcuiSJvbj5w90q3VMZT5cLHIDEQLG8DC7Z6EN-Gh8n2Sf3775dPZ-tjx_tzg7Xc50KYs4qwhIS6Vhgsi6pJyxkmsrGso5B2HrihhWlFXREEFTa2AN8rIijCNSEMywk-zpXnfb-qBG54IquKhkyZmoErHYE8bDpdr2bgP9L-XBqasF368U9NHpFlWtq6YoSsBa1txiA40WUhgqwEhZWkhar8dqQ7NBo5M9PbQT0emfzq3Vyn9XVdqLlCIJvBgFev9twBDVJtmObQsd-uFq33XqTtQsoc_-QW_vbqRWkBpwnfWprt6JqtOSk4pUVPJEzW-h0mN2B56umXVpfZLwcpKQmIg_4wqGENTi48X_s-dfpuzzA3aN0MZ18O2wu5thCvI9qHsfQo_2xmRK1G5Krt1QuylR45SktCeHB3STdD0W7C_DjA3R</recordid><startdate>20201105</startdate><enddate>20201105</enddate><creator>Grosser, Malte</creator><creator>Gellißen, Susanne</creator><creator>Borchert, Patrick</creator><creator>Sedlacik, Jan</creator><creator>Nawabi, Jawed</creator><creator>Fiehler, Jens</creator><creator>Forkert, Nils D</creator><general>Public Library of Science</general><general>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>IOV</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7139-3284</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20201105</creationdate><title>Localized prediction of tissue outcome in acute ischemic stroke patients using diffusion- and perfusion-weighted MRI datasets</title><author>Grosser, Malte ; Gellißen, Susanne ; Borchert, Patrick ; Sedlacik, Jan ; Nawabi, Jawed ; Fiehler, Jens ; Forkert, Nils D</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-70a9f19d350986143364cf5b1444a5f870d32672b051331afde467034ee1a53d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Area Under Curve</topic><topic>Biology and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Blood</topic><topic>Brain</topic><topic>Brain - physiopathology</topic><topic>Brain Ischemia - physiopathology</topic><topic>Cerebrospinal fluid</topic><topic>Computer and Information Sciences</topic><topic>Datasets</topic><topic>Decision making</topic><topic>Decision trees</topic><topic>Development and progression</topic><topic>Diagnosis</topic><topic>Diffusion</topic><topic>Diffusion Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Forecasting - methods</topic><topic>Forecasts and trends</topic><topic>Gene mapping</topic><topic>Health aspects</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Ischemia</topic><topic>Ischemic Stroke - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Learning algorithms</topic><topic>Lesions</topic><topic>Logistic Models</topic><topic>Machine Learning</topic><topic>Magnetic Resonance Angiography - methods</topic><topic>Magnetic resonance imaging</topic><topic>Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medicine and Health Sciences</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Neuroimaging</topic><topic>Patient outcomes</topic><topic>Perfusion</topic><topic>Physical Sciences</topic><topic>Predictions</topic><topic>Prognosis</topic><topic>Regression analysis</topic><topic>Research and Analysis Methods</topic><topic>ROC Curve</topic><topic>Sensitivity and Specificity</topic><topic>Statistical analysis</topic><topic>Stroke</topic><topic>Stroke - physiopathology</topic><topic>Tissues</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Grosser, Malte</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gellißen, Susanne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Borchert, Patrick</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sedlacik, Jan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nawabi, Jawed</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fiehler, Jens</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Forkert, Nils D</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Opposing Viewpoints</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Materials Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Grosser, Malte</au><au>Gellißen, Susanne</au><au>Borchert, Patrick</au><au>Sedlacik, Jan</au><au>Nawabi, Jawed</au><au>Fiehler, Jens</au><au>Forkert, Nils D</au><au>Jiang, Quan</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Localized prediction of tissue outcome in acute ischemic stroke patients using diffusion- and perfusion-weighted MRI datasets</atitle><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><date>2020-11-05</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>15</volume><issue>11</issue><spage>e0241917</spage><pages>e0241917-</pages><issn>1932-6203</issn><eissn>1932-6203</eissn><abstract>An accurate prediction of tissue outcome in acute ischemic stroke patients is of high interest for treatment decision making. To date, various machine learning models have been proposed that combine multi-parametric imaging data for this purpose. However, most of these machine learning models were trained using voxel information extracted from the whole brain, without taking differences in susceptibility to ischemia into account that exist between brain regions. The aim of this study was to develop and evaluate a local tissue outcome prediction approach, which makes predictions using locally trained machine learning models and thus accounts for regional differences. Multi-parametric MRI data from 99 acute ischemic stroke patients were used for the development and evaluation of the local tissue outcome prediction approach. Diffusion (ADC) and perfusion parameter maps (CBF, CBV, MTT, Tmax) and corresponding follow-up lesion masks for each patient were registered to the MNI brain atlas. Logistic regression (LR) and random forest (RF) models were trained employing a local approach, which makes predictions using models individually trained for each specific voxel position using the corresponding local data. A global approach, which uses a single model trained using all voxels of the brain, was used for comparison. Tissue outcome predictions resulting from the global and local RF and LR models, as well as a combined (hybrid) approach were quantitatively evaluated and compared using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC AUC), the Dice coefficient, and the sensitivity and specificity metrics. Statistical analysis revealed the highest ROC AUC and Dice values for the hybrid approach. With 0.872 (ROC AUC; LR) and 0.353 (Dice; RF), these values were significantly higher (p &lt; 0.01) than the values of the two other approaches. In addition, the local approach achieved the highest sensitivity of 0.448 (LR). Overall, the hybrid approach was only outperformed in sensitivity (LR) by the local approach and in specificity by both other approaches. However, in these cases the effect sizes were comparatively small. The results of this study suggest that using locally trained machine learning models can lead to better lesion outcome prediction results compared to a single global machine learning model trained using all voxel information independent of the location in the brain.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Public Library of Science</pub><pmid>33152045</pmid><doi>10.1371/journal.pone.0241917</doi><tpages>e0241917</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7139-3284</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1932-6203
ispartof PloS one, 2020-11, Vol.15 (11), p.e0241917
issn 1932-6203
1932-6203
language eng
recordid cdi_plos_journals_2457964357
source MEDLINE; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; PubMed Central; Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry; Public Library of Science (PLoS)
subjects Adult
Aged
Area Under Curve
Biology and Life Sciences
Blood
Brain
Brain - physiopathology
Brain Ischemia - physiopathology
Cerebrospinal fluid
Computer and Information Sciences
Datasets
Decision making
Decision trees
Development and progression
Diagnosis
Diffusion
Diffusion Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods
Female
Forecasting - methods
Forecasts and trends
Gene mapping
Health aspects
Humans
Ischemia
Ischemic Stroke - diagnostic imaging
Learning algorithms
Lesions
Logistic Models
Machine Learning
Magnetic Resonance Angiography - methods
Magnetic resonance imaging
Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods
Male
Medicine and Health Sciences
Middle Aged
Neuroimaging
Patient outcomes
Perfusion
Physical Sciences
Predictions
Prognosis
Regression analysis
Research and Analysis Methods
ROC Curve
Sensitivity and Specificity
Statistical analysis
Stroke
Stroke - physiopathology
Tissues
title Localized prediction of tissue outcome in acute ischemic stroke patients using diffusion- and perfusion-weighted MRI datasets
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-30T20%3A33%3A47IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_plos_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Localized%20prediction%20of%20tissue%20outcome%20in%20acute%20ischemic%20stroke%20patients%20using%20diffusion-%20and%20perfusion-weighted%20MRI%20datasets&rft.jtitle=PloS%20one&rft.au=Grosser,%20Malte&rft.date=2020-11-05&rft.volume=15&rft.issue=11&rft.spage=e0241917&rft.pages=e0241917-&rft.issn=1932-6203&rft.eissn=1932-6203&rft_id=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0241917&rft_dat=%3Cgale_plos_%3EA640707194%3C/gale_plos_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2457964357&rft_id=info:pmid/33152045&rft_galeid=A640707194&rft_doaj_id=oai_doaj_org_article_8c7b226ae8984febabc595d15ad996fa&rfr_iscdi=true