Assesment of the QuickSee wavefront autorefractor for characterizing refractive errors in school-age children
To assess the performance of an open-view binocular handheld aberrometer (QuickSee) for diagnosing refractive errors in children. 123 school-age children (9.9 ± 3.3 years) with moderate refractive error underwent autorefraction (AR) with a standard desktop device and subjective refraction (SR), with...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | PloS one 2020-10, Vol.15 (10), p.e0240933-e0240933 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | e0240933 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 10 |
| container_start_page | e0240933 |
| container_title | PloS one |
| container_volume | 15 |
| creator | Gil, Andrea Hernández, Carlos S Pérez-Merino, Pablo Rubio, Marcos Velarde, Gonzalo Abellanas-Lodares, María Román-Daza, Ángeles Alejandre, Nicolás Jiménez-Alfaro, Ignacio Casares, Ignacio Dave, Shivang R Lim, Daryl Lage, Eduardo |
| description | To assess the performance of an open-view binocular handheld aberrometer (QuickSee) for diagnosing refractive errors in children.
123 school-age children (9.9 ± 3.3 years) with moderate refractive error underwent autorefraction (AR) with a standard desktop device and subjective refraction (SR), with or without cycloplegia to determine their eyeglass prescription. Measurements with QuickSee (QS) were taken in 62 of these patients without cycloplegia (NC), and in 61 under cycloplegia (C). Differences in refraction values (AR vs SR vs QS) as well as the visual acuity (VA) achieved by the patients with each method (QS vs SR) were used to evaluate the performance of the device in measuring refractive error.
The spherical equivalent refraction obtained by QS agreed within 0.5 D of the SR in 71% (NC) and 70% (C) of the cases. Agreement between the desktop autorefractor and SR for the same threshold was of 61% (NC) and 77% (C). VA resulting from QS refractions was equal to or better than that achieved by SR procedure in 77% (NC) and 74% (C) of the patients. Average improvement in VA with the QS refractions was of 8.6 and 13.4 optotypes for the NC and C groups respectively, while the SR procedure provided average improvements of 8.9 (NC) and 14.8 (C) optotypes.
The high level of agreement between QuickSee and subjective refraction together with the VA improvement achieved in both study groups using QuickSee refractions suggest that the device is a useful autorefraction tool for school-age children. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1371/journal.pone.0240933 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_plos_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_plos_journals_2455533801</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A639736208</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_9be9966b961a408a9e31dc084c7056bf</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A639736208</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-bf2202ccc262254364e7f2dad2ebf92a1f8d99879482cd6ff26ce7f151a744cb3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNk1uL1DAUx4so7rr6DUQLgujDjLk1bV6EYfEysLDoqq8hTU_ajG0zm7Tj5dObcbrLVPZBQsjl_M4_yck5SfIUoyWmOX6zcaPvVbvcuh6WiDAkKL2XnGJByYITRO8fzU-SRyFsEMpowfnD5IRSjInA5DTpViFA6KAfUmfSoYH002j19yuA9IfagfEuWtQ4OB_nSscxNbHrRu1X4O1v29fpZLQ7SMF750Nq-zToxrl2oWqIuG0rD_3j5IFRbYAn03iWfH3_7sv5x8XF5Yf1-epiobkgw6I0hCCitSackIxRziA3pFIVgdIIorApKiGKXLCC6IobQ7iOBM6wyhnTJT1Lnh90t60LcopUkIRlWUZpgXAk1geicmojt952yv-STln5d8P5Wio_WN2CFCUIwXkpOFYMFUoAxZVGBdM5ynhpotbb6bSx7KDSMZhetTPRuaW3jazdTuaZIAXiUeDVJODd9QhhkJ0NGtpW9eDGw70LxnJOI_riH_Tu101UreIDbG9cPFfvReWKU5HTmBRFpJZ3ULFV0Fkd08rYuD9zeD1ziMwAP4dajSHI9dXn_2cvv83Zl0dsA6odmuDacbCuD3OQHUDtXQgx626DjJHcV8VNNOS-KuRUFdHt2fEH3TrdlAH9A4g1CPw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2455533801</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Assesment of the QuickSee wavefront autorefractor for characterizing refractive errors in school-age children</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Public Library of Science (PLoS) Journals Open Access</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry</source><creator>Gil, Andrea ; Hernández, Carlos S ; Pérez-Merino, Pablo ; Rubio, Marcos ; Velarde, Gonzalo ; Abellanas-Lodares, María ; Román-Daza, Ángeles ; Alejandre, Nicolás ; Jiménez-Alfaro, Ignacio ; Casares, Ignacio ; Dave, Shivang R ; Lim, Daryl ; Lage, Eduardo</creator><contributor>Mohan, Rajiv R.</contributor><creatorcontrib>Gil, Andrea ; Hernández, Carlos S ; Pérez-Merino, Pablo ; Rubio, Marcos ; Velarde, Gonzalo ; Abellanas-Lodares, María ; Román-Daza, Ángeles ; Alejandre, Nicolás ; Jiménez-Alfaro, Ignacio ; Casares, Ignacio ; Dave, Shivang R ; Lim, Daryl ; Lage, Eduardo ; Mohan, Rajiv R.</creatorcontrib><description>To assess the performance of an open-view binocular handheld aberrometer (QuickSee) for diagnosing refractive errors in children.
123 school-age children (9.9 ± 3.3 years) with moderate refractive error underwent autorefraction (AR) with a standard desktop device and subjective refraction (SR), with or without cycloplegia to determine their eyeglass prescription. Measurements with QuickSee (QS) were taken in 62 of these patients without cycloplegia (NC), and in 61 under cycloplegia (C). Differences in refraction values (AR vs SR vs QS) as well as the visual acuity (VA) achieved by the patients with each method (QS vs SR) were used to evaluate the performance of the device in measuring refractive error.
The spherical equivalent refraction obtained by QS agreed within 0.5 D of the SR in 71% (NC) and 70% (C) of the cases. Agreement between the desktop autorefractor and SR for the same threshold was of 61% (NC) and 77% (C). VA resulting from QS refractions was equal to or better than that achieved by SR procedure in 77% (NC) and 74% (C) of the patients. Average improvement in VA with the QS refractions was of 8.6 and 13.4 optotypes for the NC and C groups respectively, while the SR procedure provided average improvements of 8.9 (NC) and 14.8 (C) optotypes.
The high level of agreement between QuickSee and subjective refraction together with the VA improvement achieved in both study groups using QuickSee refractions suggest that the device is a useful autorefraction tool for school-age children.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0240933</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33112912</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Public Library of Science</publisher><subject>Acuity ; Adolescent ; Age ; Agreements ; Binocular vision ; Biology and Life Sciences ; Blindness ; Child ; Child, Preschool ; Childhood vision disorders ; Children ; Communications technology ; Diabetic retinopathy ; Diagnosis ; Engineering and Technology ; Error analysis ; Evaluation ; Eyeglasses ; Eyes & eyesight ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; Measuring instruments ; Medical screening ; Medicine and Health Sciences ; Ophthalmic equipment ; Optometry - instrumentation ; Optometry - methods ; Patients ; Pediatric research ; Pediatrics ; Performance evaluation ; Prescriptions ; Refraction ; Refraction, Ocular - physiology ; Refractive errors ; Refractive Errors - diagnosis ; Schools ; Social Sciences ; Strabismus ; Vision Tests - instrumentation ; Vision Tests - methods ; Visual acuity ; Visual Acuity - physiology ; Visual impairment ; Wave fronts</subject><ispartof>PloS one, 2020-10, Vol.15 (10), p.e0240933-e0240933</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2020 Public Library of Science</rights><rights>2020 Gil et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>2020 Gil et al 2020 Gil et al</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-bf2202ccc262254364e7f2dad2ebf92a1f8d99879482cd6ff26ce7f151a744cb3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-bf2202ccc262254364e7f2dad2ebf92a1f8d99879482cd6ff26ce7f151a744cb3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-0011-2451</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7592806/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7592806/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,725,778,782,862,883,2098,2917,23849,27907,27908,53774,53776,79351,79352</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33112912$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Mohan, Rajiv R.</contributor><creatorcontrib>Gil, Andrea</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hernández, Carlos S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pérez-Merino, Pablo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rubio, Marcos</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Velarde, Gonzalo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Abellanas-Lodares, María</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Román-Daza, Ángeles</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alejandre, Nicolás</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jiménez-Alfaro, Ignacio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Casares, Ignacio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dave, Shivang R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lim, Daryl</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lage, Eduardo</creatorcontrib><title>Assesment of the QuickSee wavefront autorefractor for characterizing refractive errors in school-age children</title><title>PloS one</title><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><description>To assess the performance of an open-view binocular handheld aberrometer (QuickSee) for diagnosing refractive errors in children.
123 school-age children (9.9 ± 3.3 years) with moderate refractive error underwent autorefraction (AR) with a standard desktop device and subjective refraction (SR), with or without cycloplegia to determine their eyeglass prescription. Measurements with QuickSee (QS) were taken in 62 of these patients without cycloplegia (NC), and in 61 under cycloplegia (C). Differences in refraction values (AR vs SR vs QS) as well as the visual acuity (VA) achieved by the patients with each method (QS vs SR) were used to evaluate the performance of the device in measuring refractive error.
The spherical equivalent refraction obtained by QS agreed within 0.5 D of the SR in 71% (NC) and 70% (C) of the cases. Agreement between the desktop autorefractor and SR for the same threshold was of 61% (NC) and 77% (C). VA resulting from QS refractions was equal to or better than that achieved by SR procedure in 77% (NC) and 74% (C) of the patients. Average improvement in VA with the QS refractions was of 8.6 and 13.4 optotypes for the NC and C groups respectively, while the SR procedure provided average improvements of 8.9 (NC) and 14.8 (C) optotypes.
The high level of agreement between QuickSee and subjective refraction together with the VA improvement achieved in both study groups using QuickSee refractions suggest that the device is a useful autorefraction tool for school-age children.</description><subject>Acuity</subject><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Age</subject><subject>Agreements</subject><subject>Binocular vision</subject><subject>Biology and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Blindness</subject><subject>Child</subject><subject>Child, Preschool</subject><subject>Childhood vision disorders</subject><subject>Children</subject><subject>Communications technology</subject><subject>Diabetic retinopathy</subject><subject>Diagnosis</subject><subject>Engineering and Technology</subject><subject>Error analysis</subject><subject>Evaluation</subject><subject>Eyeglasses</subject><subject>Eyes & eyesight</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Measuring instruments</subject><subject>Medical screening</subject><subject>Medicine and Health Sciences</subject><subject>Ophthalmic equipment</subject><subject>Optometry - instrumentation</subject><subject>Optometry - methods</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Pediatric research</subject><subject>Pediatrics</subject><subject>Performance evaluation</subject><subject>Prescriptions</subject><subject>Refraction</subject><subject>Refraction, Ocular - physiology</subject><subject>Refractive errors</subject><subject>Refractive Errors - diagnosis</subject><subject>Schools</subject><subject>Social Sciences</subject><subject>Strabismus</subject><subject>Vision Tests - instrumentation</subject><subject>Vision Tests - methods</subject><subject>Visual acuity</subject><subject>Visual Acuity - physiology</subject><subject>Visual impairment</subject><subject>Wave fronts</subject><issn>1932-6203</issn><issn>1932-6203</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNqNk1uL1DAUx4so7rr6DUQLgujDjLk1bV6EYfEysLDoqq8hTU_ajG0zm7Tj5dObcbrLVPZBQsjl_M4_yck5SfIUoyWmOX6zcaPvVbvcuh6WiDAkKL2XnGJByYITRO8fzU-SRyFsEMpowfnD5IRSjInA5DTpViFA6KAfUmfSoYH002j19yuA9IfagfEuWtQ4OB_nSscxNbHrRu1X4O1v29fpZLQ7SMF750Nq-zToxrl2oWqIuG0rD_3j5IFRbYAn03iWfH3_7sv5x8XF5Yf1-epiobkgw6I0hCCitSackIxRziA3pFIVgdIIorApKiGKXLCC6IobQ7iOBM6wyhnTJT1Lnh90t60LcopUkIRlWUZpgXAk1geicmojt952yv-STln5d8P5Wio_WN2CFCUIwXkpOFYMFUoAxZVGBdM5ynhpotbb6bSx7KDSMZhetTPRuaW3jazdTuaZIAXiUeDVJODd9QhhkJ0NGtpW9eDGw70LxnJOI_riH_Tu101UreIDbG9cPFfvReWKU5HTmBRFpJZ3ULFV0Fkd08rYuD9zeD1ziMwAP4dajSHI9dXn_2cvv83Zl0dsA6odmuDacbCuD3OQHUDtXQgx626DjJHcV8VNNOS-KuRUFdHt2fEH3TrdlAH9A4g1CPw</recordid><startdate>20201028</startdate><enddate>20201028</enddate><creator>Gil, Andrea</creator><creator>Hernández, Carlos S</creator><creator>Pérez-Merino, Pablo</creator><creator>Rubio, Marcos</creator><creator>Velarde, Gonzalo</creator><creator>Abellanas-Lodares, María</creator><creator>Román-Daza, Ángeles</creator><creator>Alejandre, Nicolás</creator><creator>Jiménez-Alfaro, Ignacio</creator><creator>Casares, Ignacio</creator><creator>Dave, Shivang R</creator><creator>Lim, Daryl</creator><creator>Lage, Eduardo</creator><general>Public Library of Science</general><general>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>IOV</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0011-2451</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20201028</creationdate><title>Assesment of the QuickSee wavefront autorefractor for characterizing refractive errors in school-age children</title><author>Gil, Andrea ; Hernández, Carlos S ; Pérez-Merino, Pablo ; Rubio, Marcos ; Velarde, Gonzalo ; Abellanas-Lodares, María ; Román-Daza, Ángeles ; Alejandre, Nicolás ; Jiménez-Alfaro, Ignacio ; Casares, Ignacio ; Dave, Shivang R ; Lim, Daryl ; Lage, Eduardo</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-bf2202ccc262254364e7f2dad2ebf92a1f8d99879482cd6ff26ce7f151a744cb3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Acuity</topic><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Age</topic><topic>Agreements</topic><topic>Binocular vision</topic><topic>Biology and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Blindness</topic><topic>Child</topic><topic>Child, Preschool</topic><topic>Childhood vision disorders</topic><topic>Children</topic><topic>Communications technology</topic><topic>Diabetic retinopathy</topic><topic>Diagnosis</topic><topic>Engineering and Technology</topic><topic>Error analysis</topic><topic>Evaluation</topic><topic>Eyeglasses</topic><topic>Eyes & eyesight</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Measuring instruments</topic><topic>Medical screening</topic><topic>Medicine and Health Sciences</topic><topic>Ophthalmic equipment</topic><topic>Optometry - instrumentation</topic><topic>Optometry - methods</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Pediatric research</topic><topic>Pediatrics</topic><topic>Performance evaluation</topic><topic>Prescriptions</topic><topic>Refraction</topic><topic>Refraction, Ocular - physiology</topic><topic>Refractive errors</topic><topic>Refractive Errors - diagnosis</topic><topic>Schools</topic><topic>Social Sciences</topic><topic>Strabismus</topic><topic>Vision Tests - instrumentation</topic><topic>Vision Tests - methods</topic><topic>Visual acuity</topic><topic>Visual Acuity - physiology</topic><topic>Visual impairment</topic><topic>Wave fronts</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Gil, Andrea</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hernández, Carlos S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pérez-Merino, Pablo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rubio, Marcos</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Velarde, Gonzalo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Abellanas-Lodares, María</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Román-Daza, Ángeles</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alejandre, Nicolás</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jiménez-Alfaro, Ignacio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Casares, Ignacio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dave, Shivang R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lim, Daryl</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lage, Eduardo</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Opposing Viewpoints</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Materials Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Gil, Andrea</au><au>Hernández, Carlos S</au><au>Pérez-Merino, Pablo</au><au>Rubio, Marcos</au><au>Velarde, Gonzalo</au><au>Abellanas-Lodares, María</au><au>Román-Daza, Ángeles</au><au>Alejandre, Nicolás</au><au>Jiménez-Alfaro, Ignacio</au><au>Casares, Ignacio</au><au>Dave, Shivang R</au><au>Lim, Daryl</au><au>Lage, Eduardo</au><au>Mohan, Rajiv R.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Assesment of the QuickSee wavefront autorefractor for characterizing refractive errors in school-age children</atitle><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><date>2020-10-28</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>15</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>e0240933</spage><epage>e0240933</epage><pages>e0240933-e0240933</pages><issn>1932-6203</issn><eissn>1932-6203</eissn><abstract>To assess the performance of an open-view binocular handheld aberrometer (QuickSee) for diagnosing refractive errors in children.
123 school-age children (9.9 ± 3.3 years) with moderate refractive error underwent autorefraction (AR) with a standard desktop device and subjective refraction (SR), with or without cycloplegia to determine their eyeglass prescription. Measurements with QuickSee (QS) were taken in 62 of these patients without cycloplegia (NC), and in 61 under cycloplegia (C). Differences in refraction values (AR vs SR vs QS) as well as the visual acuity (VA) achieved by the patients with each method (QS vs SR) were used to evaluate the performance of the device in measuring refractive error.
The spherical equivalent refraction obtained by QS agreed within 0.5 D of the SR in 71% (NC) and 70% (C) of the cases. Agreement between the desktop autorefractor and SR for the same threshold was of 61% (NC) and 77% (C). VA resulting from QS refractions was equal to or better than that achieved by SR procedure in 77% (NC) and 74% (C) of the patients. Average improvement in VA with the QS refractions was of 8.6 and 13.4 optotypes for the NC and C groups respectively, while the SR procedure provided average improvements of 8.9 (NC) and 14.8 (C) optotypes.
The high level of agreement between QuickSee and subjective refraction together with the VA improvement achieved in both study groups using QuickSee refractions suggest that the device is a useful autorefraction tool for school-age children.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Public Library of Science</pub><pmid>33112912</pmid><doi>10.1371/journal.pone.0240933</doi><tpages>e0240933</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0011-2451</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 1932-6203 |
| ispartof | PloS one, 2020-10, Vol.15 (10), p.e0240933-e0240933 |
| issn | 1932-6203 1932-6203 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_plos_journals_2455533801 |
| source | MEDLINE; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Public Library of Science (PLoS) Journals Open Access; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central; Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry |
| subjects | Acuity Adolescent Age Agreements Binocular vision Biology and Life Sciences Blindness Child Child, Preschool Childhood vision disorders Children Communications technology Diabetic retinopathy Diagnosis Engineering and Technology Error analysis Evaluation Eyeglasses Eyes & eyesight Female Humans Male Measuring instruments Medical screening Medicine and Health Sciences Ophthalmic equipment Optometry - instrumentation Optometry - methods Patients Pediatric research Pediatrics Performance evaluation Prescriptions Refraction Refraction, Ocular - physiology Refractive errors Refractive Errors - diagnosis Schools Social Sciences Strabismus Vision Tests - instrumentation Vision Tests - methods Visual acuity Visual Acuity - physiology Visual impairment Wave fronts |
| title | Assesment of the QuickSee wavefront autorefractor for characterizing refractive errors in school-age children |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-17T04%3A48%3A09IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_plos_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Assesment%20of%20the%20QuickSee%20wavefront%20autorefractor%20for%20characterizing%20refractive%20errors%20in%20school-age%20children&rft.jtitle=PloS%20one&rft.au=Gil,%20Andrea&rft.date=2020-10-28&rft.volume=15&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=e0240933&rft.epage=e0240933&rft.pages=e0240933-e0240933&rft.issn=1932-6203&rft.eissn=1932-6203&rft_id=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0240933&rft_dat=%3Cgale_plos_%3EA639736208%3C/gale_plos_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2455533801&rft_id=info:pmid/33112912&rft_galeid=A639736208&rft_doaj_id=oai_doaj_org_article_9be9966b961a408a9e31dc084c7056bf&rfr_iscdi=true |