Does environmental regulation reduce China's haze pollution? An empirical analysis based on panel quantile regression
Haze pollution in China is very serious and has become the source of mortality, affecting the health and lives of residents. The Chinese government adopts different policy measures to reduce haze pollution. The impact of different types of environmental regulations on haze pollution has become a hot...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | PloS one 2020-10, Vol.15 (10), p.e0240723 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 10 |
| container_start_page | e0240723 |
| container_title | PloS one |
| container_volume | 15 |
| creator | Li, Congxin Li, Guozhu |
| description | Haze pollution in China is very serious and has become the source of mortality, affecting the health and lives of residents. The Chinese government adopts different policy measures to reduce haze pollution. The impact of different types of environmental regulations on haze pollution has become a hot topic for academics and government departments. Based on panel data from 2005-2017, this paper studies the effect of different types of environmental regulations on haze pollution in 30 provinces of China using a panel quantile model. The results show that when haze pollution changes from a low quantile to a high quantile, the marginal impact of command-and-control environmental regulation on haze pollution changes from 0.122 to -0.332. Command-and-control environmental regulation can reduce haze pollution, but its impact is not significant. The main reason for this finding is that environmental law enforcement is not strict. The marginal impact of economically restrained environmental regulation on haze pollution changes from -14.389 to 49.939. Economically restrained environmental regulation can reduce haze pollution in low quantiles, but not in high quantiles. The collection of sewage charges fees is far less than the total profit, which has no deterrent effect on enterprises. The marginal impact of public participation in environmental regulation on haze pollution changes from 0.154 to -0.002. Public participation in environmental regulation cannot reduce haze pollution in low quantiles, but can in high quantiles; however its impact becomes insignificant. This study reveals the quantile-based discrepancy in the effect of environmental regulation on haze pollution, and offers a new perspective for research on the effects of environmental regulation. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1371/journal.pone.0240723 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_plos_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_plos_journals_2455528966</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A639736136</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_8265e78679194ca891c863bc91bc7061</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A639736136</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-d373t-2b67a4778c14467a2750c8aa95e3172801d48bb2f0df3fb3b8fbca153526095d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kktv1DAUhSMEoqXwDxBEQiqrGfyIXxvQaHhVqsQG1tGN40w8cuzUTiqVX18PE9DMgpWPfM_97tG1i-I1RmtMBf6wD3P04NZj8GaNSIUEoU-KS6woWXGC6NMTfVG8SGmPEKOS8-fFBaUYEynkZTF_DiaVxt_bGPxg_ASujGY3O5hs8Fm2szbltrce3qeyh9-mHINz86H6qdz40gyjjVbnNshpHpJNZQPJtGXuHsEbV97N4CfrzIEbTUq582XxrAOXzKvlvCp-ff3yc_t9dfvj2812c7tqqaDTijRcQCWE1LiqsiSCIS0BFDMUCyIRbivZNKRDbUe7hjayazRgRhnhSLGWXhVvj9zRhVQvG0s1qRhjRCrOs-Pm6GgD7Osx2gHiQx3A1n8uQtzVECernakl4cwIyYXCqtIgFdaS00Yr3GiBOM6sj8u0uRlMq_M2I7gz6HnF277ehftaMEVkJTPg3QKI4W42afpP5MW1g5zK-i5kmB5s0vWGUyVojnJwXZ-4egNu6lM4Plw6N745Tf0v7t8_Qh8BDie_VA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2455528966</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Does environmental regulation reduce China's haze pollution? An empirical analysis based on panel quantile regression</title><source>Public Library of Science (PLoS) Journals Open Access</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>PAIS Index</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry</source><creator>Li, Congxin ; Li, Guozhu</creator><creatorcontrib>Li, Congxin ; Li, Guozhu</creatorcontrib><description>Haze pollution in China is very serious and has become the source of mortality, affecting the health and lives of residents. The Chinese government adopts different policy measures to reduce haze pollution. The impact of different types of environmental regulations on haze pollution has become a hot topic for academics and government departments. Based on panel data from 2005-2017, this paper studies the effect of different types of environmental regulations on haze pollution in 30 provinces of China using a panel quantile model. The results show that when haze pollution changes from a low quantile to a high quantile, the marginal impact of command-and-control environmental regulation on haze pollution changes from 0.122 to -0.332. Command-and-control environmental regulation can reduce haze pollution, but its impact is not significant. The main reason for this finding is that environmental law enforcement is not strict. The marginal impact of economically restrained environmental regulation on haze pollution changes from -14.389 to 49.939. Economically restrained environmental regulation can reduce haze pollution in low quantiles, but not in high quantiles. The collection of sewage charges fees is far less than the total profit, which has no deterrent effect on enterprises. The marginal impact of public participation in environmental regulation on haze pollution changes from 0.154 to -0.002. Public participation in environmental regulation cannot reduce haze pollution in low quantiles, but can in high quantiles; however its impact becomes insignificant. This study reveals the quantile-based discrepancy in the effect of environmental regulation on haze pollution, and offers a new perspective for research on the effects of environmental regulation.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0240723</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33112878</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Public Library of Science</publisher><subject>Air pollution ; Air Pollution - analysis ; Air pollution control ; Atmospheric haze ; Changes ; China ; Citizen participation ; Command and control ; Departments ; Ecology and Environmental Sciences ; Economic development ; Efficiency ; Empirical analysis ; Empirical Research ; Engineering and Technology ; Environmental changes ; Environmental effects ; Environmental impact ; Environmental law ; Environmental policy ; Environmental protection ; Environmental regulations ; Government agencies ; Haze ; Impact analysis ; Law enforcement ; Laws, regulations and rules ; Measurement ; Methods ; Outdoor air quality ; Panel data ; People and Places ; Pollution ; Pollution control ; Pollution effects ; Provinces ; Public participation ; Quantile regression ; Quantiles ; Regression Analysis ; Regulation ; Regulations ; Rule of law ; Sewage ; Social Control, Formal ; Social Sciences ; Variables</subject><ispartof>PloS one, 2020-10, Vol.15 (10), p.e0240723</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2020 Public Library of Science</rights><rights>2020 Li, Li. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>2020 Li, Li 2020 Li, Li</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><orcidid>0000-0001-8880-7711</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7592848/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7592848/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,860,881,2096,23845,27843,27901,27902,53766,53768,79569,79570</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33112878$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Li, Congxin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Guozhu</creatorcontrib><title>Does environmental regulation reduce China's haze pollution? An empirical analysis based on panel quantile regression</title><title>PloS one</title><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><description>Haze pollution in China is very serious and has become the source of mortality, affecting the health and lives of residents. The Chinese government adopts different policy measures to reduce haze pollution. The impact of different types of environmental regulations on haze pollution has become a hot topic for academics and government departments. Based on panel data from 2005-2017, this paper studies the effect of different types of environmental regulations on haze pollution in 30 provinces of China using a panel quantile model. The results show that when haze pollution changes from a low quantile to a high quantile, the marginal impact of command-and-control environmental regulation on haze pollution changes from 0.122 to -0.332. Command-and-control environmental regulation can reduce haze pollution, but its impact is not significant. The main reason for this finding is that environmental law enforcement is not strict. The marginal impact of economically restrained environmental regulation on haze pollution changes from -14.389 to 49.939. Economically restrained environmental regulation can reduce haze pollution in low quantiles, but not in high quantiles. The collection of sewage charges fees is far less than the total profit, which has no deterrent effect on enterprises. The marginal impact of public participation in environmental regulation on haze pollution changes from 0.154 to -0.002. Public participation in environmental regulation cannot reduce haze pollution in low quantiles, but can in high quantiles; however its impact becomes insignificant. This study reveals the quantile-based discrepancy in the effect of environmental regulation on haze pollution, and offers a new perspective for research on the effects of environmental regulation.</description><subject>Air pollution</subject><subject>Air Pollution - analysis</subject><subject>Air pollution control</subject><subject>Atmospheric haze</subject><subject>Changes</subject><subject>China</subject><subject>Citizen participation</subject><subject>Command and control</subject><subject>Departments</subject><subject>Ecology and Environmental Sciences</subject><subject>Economic development</subject><subject>Efficiency</subject><subject>Empirical analysis</subject><subject>Empirical Research</subject><subject>Engineering and Technology</subject><subject>Environmental changes</subject><subject>Environmental effects</subject><subject>Environmental impact</subject><subject>Environmental law</subject><subject>Environmental policy</subject><subject>Environmental protection</subject><subject>Environmental regulations</subject><subject>Government agencies</subject><subject>Haze</subject><subject>Impact analysis</subject><subject>Law enforcement</subject><subject>Laws, regulations and rules</subject><subject>Measurement</subject><subject>Methods</subject><subject>Outdoor air quality</subject><subject>Panel data</subject><subject>People and Places</subject><subject>Pollution</subject><subject>Pollution control</subject><subject>Pollution effects</subject><subject>Provinces</subject><subject>Public participation</subject><subject>Quantile regression</subject><subject>Quantiles</subject><subject>Regression Analysis</subject><subject>Regulation</subject><subject>Regulations</subject><subject>Rule of law</subject><subject>Sewage</subject><subject>Social Control, Formal</subject><subject>Social Sciences</subject><subject>Variables</subject><issn>1932-6203</issn><issn>1932-6203</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kktv1DAUhSMEoqXwDxBEQiqrGfyIXxvQaHhVqsQG1tGN40w8cuzUTiqVX18PE9DMgpWPfM_97tG1i-I1RmtMBf6wD3P04NZj8GaNSIUEoU-KS6woWXGC6NMTfVG8SGmPEKOS8-fFBaUYEynkZTF_DiaVxt_bGPxg_ASujGY3O5hs8Fm2szbltrce3qeyh9-mHINz86H6qdz40gyjjVbnNshpHpJNZQPJtGXuHsEbV97N4CfrzIEbTUq582XxrAOXzKvlvCp-ff3yc_t9dfvj2812c7tqqaDTijRcQCWE1LiqsiSCIS0BFDMUCyIRbivZNKRDbUe7hjayazRgRhnhSLGWXhVvj9zRhVQvG0s1qRhjRCrOs-Pm6GgD7Osx2gHiQx3A1n8uQtzVECernakl4cwIyYXCqtIgFdaS00Yr3GiBOM6sj8u0uRlMq_M2I7gz6HnF277ehftaMEVkJTPg3QKI4W42afpP5MW1g5zK-i5kmB5s0vWGUyVojnJwXZ-4egNu6lM4Plw6N745Tf0v7t8_Qh8BDie_VA</recordid><startdate>20201028</startdate><enddate>20201028</enddate><creator>Li, Congxin</creator><creator>Li, Guozhu</creator><general>Public Library of Science</general><general>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PHGZM</scope><scope>PHGZT</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PJZUB</scope><scope>PKEHL</scope><scope>PPXIY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQGLB</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8880-7711</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20201028</creationdate><title>Does environmental regulation reduce China's haze pollution? An empirical analysis based on panel quantile regression</title><author>Li, Congxin ; Li, Guozhu</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-d373t-2b67a4778c14467a2750c8aa95e3172801d48bb2f0df3fb3b8fbca153526095d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Air pollution</topic><topic>Air Pollution - analysis</topic><topic>Air pollution control</topic><topic>Atmospheric haze</topic><topic>Changes</topic><topic>China</topic><topic>Citizen participation</topic><topic>Command and control</topic><topic>Departments</topic><topic>Ecology and Environmental Sciences</topic><topic>Economic development</topic><topic>Efficiency</topic><topic>Empirical analysis</topic><topic>Empirical Research</topic><topic>Engineering and Technology</topic><topic>Environmental changes</topic><topic>Environmental effects</topic><topic>Environmental impact</topic><topic>Environmental law</topic><topic>Environmental policy</topic><topic>Environmental protection</topic><topic>Environmental regulations</topic><topic>Government agencies</topic><topic>Haze</topic><topic>Impact analysis</topic><topic>Law enforcement</topic><topic>Laws, regulations and rules</topic><topic>Measurement</topic><topic>Methods</topic><topic>Outdoor air quality</topic><topic>Panel data</topic><topic>People and Places</topic><topic>Pollution</topic><topic>Pollution control</topic><topic>Pollution effects</topic><topic>Provinces</topic><topic>Public participation</topic><topic>Quantile regression</topic><topic>Quantiles</topic><topic>Regression Analysis</topic><topic>Regulation</topic><topic>Regulations</topic><topic>Rule of law</topic><topic>Sewage</topic><topic>Social Control, Formal</topic><topic>Social Sciences</topic><topic>Variables</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Li, Congxin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Guozhu</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection (ProQuest)</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection (ProQuest)</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Materials Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic (New)</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Research Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Health & Nursing</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Applied & Life Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Li, Congxin</au><au>Li, Guozhu</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Does environmental regulation reduce China's haze pollution? An empirical analysis based on panel quantile regression</atitle><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><date>2020-10-28</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>15</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>e0240723</spage><pages>e0240723-</pages><issn>1932-6203</issn><eissn>1932-6203</eissn><abstract>Haze pollution in China is very serious and has become the source of mortality, affecting the health and lives of residents. The Chinese government adopts different policy measures to reduce haze pollution. The impact of different types of environmental regulations on haze pollution has become a hot topic for academics and government departments. Based on panel data from 2005-2017, this paper studies the effect of different types of environmental regulations on haze pollution in 30 provinces of China using a panel quantile model. The results show that when haze pollution changes from a low quantile to a high quantile, the marginal impact of command-and-control environmental regulation on haze pollution changes from 0.122 to -0.332. Command-and-control environmental regulation can reduce haze pollution, but its impact is not significant. The main reason for this finding is that environmental law enforcement is not strict. The marginal impact of economically restrained environmental regulation on haze pollution changes from -14.389 to 49.939. Economically restrained environmental regulation can reduce haze pollution in low quantiles, but not in high quantiles. The collection of sewage charges fees is far less than the total profit, which has no deterrent effect on enterprises. The marginal impact of public participation in environmental regulation on haze pollution changes from 0.154 to -0.002. Public participation in environmental regulation cannot reduce haze pollution in low quantiles, but can in high quantiles; however its impact becomes insignificant. This study reveals the quantile-based discrepancy in the effect of environmental regulation on haze pollution, and offers a new perspective for research on the effects of environmental regulation.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Public Library of Science</pub><pmid>33112878</pmid><doi>10.1371/journal.pone.0240723</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8880-7711</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 1932-6203 |
| ispartof | PloS one, 2020-10, Vol.15 (10), p.e0240723 |
| issn | 1932-6203 1932-6203 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_plos_journals_2455528966 |
| source | Public Library of Science (PLoS) Journals Open Access; MEDLINE; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; PAIS Index; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; PubMed Central; Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry |
| subjects | Air pollution Air Pollution - analysis Air pollution control Atmospheric haze Changes China Citizen participation Command and control Departments Ecology and Environmental Sciences Economic development Efficiency Empirical analysis Empirical Research Engineering and Technology Environmental changes Environmental effects Environmental impact Environmental law Environmental policy Environmental protection Environmental regulations Government agencies Haze Impact analysis Law enforcement Laws, regulations and rules Measurement Methods Outdoor air quality Panel data People and Places Pollution Pollution control Pollution effects Provinces Public participation Quantile regression Quantiles Regression Analysis Regulation Regulations Rule of law Sewage Social Control, Formal Social Sciences Variables |
| title | Does environmental regulation reduce China's haze pollution? An empirical analysis based on panel quantile regression |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-21T20%3A26%3A00IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_plos_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Does%20environmental%20regulation%20reduce%20China's%20haze%20pollution?%20An%20empirical%20analysis%20based%20on%20panel%20quantile%20regression&rft.jtitle=PloS%20one&rft.au=Li,%20Congxin&rft.date=2020-10-28&rft.volume=15&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=e0240723&rft.pages=e0240723-&rft.issn=1932-6203&rft.eissn=1932-6203&rft_id=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0240723&rft_dat=%3Cgale_plos_%3EA639736136%3C/gale_plos_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2455528966&rft_id=info:pmid/33112878&rft_galeid=A639736136&rft_doaj_id=oai_doaj_org_article_8265e78679194ca891c863bc91bc7061&rfr_iscdi=true |