Gender differences in factors influencing intention to undergo cardiovascular disease health checks: A cross-sectional survey

Undergo a health check for cardiovascular disease (CVD) is an important strategy to improve cardiovascular (CV) health. Men are reported to be less likely to undergo cardiovascular disease (CVD) health check than women. Gender difference could be one of the factors influencing health seeking behavio...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:PloS one 2020-09, Vol.15 (9), p.e0239679-e0239679
Hauptverfasser: Cheong, Ai Theng, Tong, Seng Fah, Chinna, Karuthan, Khoo, Ee Ming, Liew, Su May, Pakpour, Amir H
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page e0239679
container_issue 9
container_start_page e0239679
container_title PloS one
container_volume 15
creator Cheong, Ai Theng
Tong, Seng Fah
Chinna, Karuthan
Khoo, Ee Ming
Liew, Su May
Pakpour, Amir H
description Undergo a health check for cardiovascular disease (CVD) is an important strategy to improve cardiovascular (CV) health. Men are reported to be less likely to undergo cardiovascular disease (CVD) health check than women. Gender difference could be one of the factors influencing health seeking behaviour of men and women. We aimed to identify gender differences in factors influencing the intention to undergo CVD health checks. This was a cross-sectional survey using mall intercept interviews. Malaysians aged [greater than or equal to]30 years without known CVD were recruited. They were asked for their intention to undergo CVD health checks and associated factors. The factors included seven internal factors that were related to individuals' attitude, perception and preparedness for CVD health checks and two external factors that were related to external resources. Hierarchical ordinal regression analysis was used to evaluate the importance of the factors on intention to undergo CVD health checks, for men and women separately. 397 participants were recruited, 60% were women. For men, internal factors explained 31.6% of the variances in likeliness and 9.6% of the timeline to undergo CVD health checks, with 1.2% and 1.8% added respectively when external factors were sequentially included. For women, internal factors explained 18.9% and 22.1% of the variances, with 3.1% and 4.2% added with inclusion of the external factors. In men, perceived drawbacks of health checks was a significant negative factor associated with likeliness to undergo CVD health checks (coefficient = -1.093; 95%CI:-1.592 to -0.594), and timeline for checks (coefficient = -0.533; 95%CI:-0.975 to -0.091). In women, readiness to handle outcomes following health checks was significantly associated with likeliness to undergo the checks (coefficient = 0.575; 95%CI: 0.063 to 1.087), and timeline for checks (coefficient = 0.645; 95%CI: 0.162 to 1.128). Both external factors 1) influence by significant others (coefficient = 0.406; 95%CI: 0.013 to 0.800) and 2) external barriers (coefficient = -0.440; 95%CI:-0.869 to -0.011) were also significantly associated with likeliness to undergo CVD health checks in women. Both men and women were influenced by internal factors in their intention to undergo CVD health checks, and women were also influenced by external factors. Interventions to encourage CVD health checks need to focus on internal factors and be gender sensitive.
doi_str_mv 10.1371/journal.pone.0239679
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_plos_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_plos_journals_2445951753</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A636415880</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_4b5547fb4ebc44dbbc5a257577c6414d</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A636415880</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c669t-e9feac965316378f399fd0c4f5e76a62be8642745ce8baab32f84485973df4b33</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNk9-L1DAQx4so3rn6HwgWBNGHrm3zq_FBWA49Fw4O_PUa0nTSzZpt9pJ28R783013q1zlHiQPGSaf-SYzmUmS50W-LBAr3m7d4Dtpl3vXwTIvEaeMP0jOC47KjJY5enjHPkuehLDNc4IqSh8nZ6jkLGe4OE9-XULXgE8bozV46BSE1HSplqp3fjS1HaLXdG20e-h647q0d-kwRrUuVdI3xh1kUIOVo0wAGSDdgLT9JlUbUD_Cu3SVKu9CyAKoUUDaNAz-ALdPk0da2gDPpn2RfPv44evFp-zq-nJ9sbrKFKW8z4BrkIpTggqKWKUR57rJFdYEGJW0rKGiuGSYKKhqKWtU6grjinCGGo1rhBbJi5Pu3rogpsoFUWJMOCkYGYn1iWic3Iq9Nzvpb4WTRhwdzrdC-t4oCwLXhGCmawy1wripa0VkSRhhTFFc4CZqvZ9uG-odNCpWzUs7E52fdGYjWncQjBQ4jykukteTgHc3A4Re7ExQYK3swA3Hd1NKK1rxiL78B70_u4lqZUwgfqqL96pRVKwoiq8mVZVHankPFVcDO6Nim2kT_bOAN7OAyPTws2_lEIJYf_n8_-z19zn76g576qXg7DD2TpiD-AQe28uD_lvkIhfjlPyphhinRExTgn4D07gFWw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2445951753</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Gender differences in factors influencing intention to undergo cardiovascular disease health checks: A cross-sectional survey</title><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry</source><creator>Cheong, Ai Theng ; Tong, Seng Fah ; Chinna, Karuthan ; Khoo, Ee Ming ; Liew, Su May ; Pakpour, Amir H</creator><contributor>Pakpour, Amir H.</contributor><creatorcontrib>Cheong, Ai Theng ; Tong, Seng Fah ; Chinna, Karuthan ; Khoo, Ee Ming ; Liew, Su May ; Pakpour, Amir H ; Pakpour, Amir H.</creatorcontrib><description>Undergo a health check for cardiovascular disease (CVD) is an important strategy to improve cardiovascular (CV) health. Men are reported to be less likely to undergo cardiovascular disease (CVD) health check than women. Gender difference could be one of the factors influencing health seeking behaviour of men and women. We aimed to identify gender differences in factors influencing the intention to undergo CVD health checks. This was a cross-sectional survey using mall intercept interviews. Malaysians aged [greater than or equal to]30 years without known CVD were recruited. They were asked for their intention to undergo CVD health checks and associated factors. The factors included seven internal factors that were related to individuals' attitude, perception and preparedness for CVD health checks and two external factors that were related to external resources. Hierarchical ordinal regression analysis was used to evaluate the importance of the factors on intention to undergo CVD health checks, for men and women separately. 397 participants were recruited, 60% were women. For men, internal factors explained 31.6% of the variances in likeliness and 9.6% of the timeline to undergo CVD health checks, with 1.2% and 1.8% added respectively when external factors were sequentially included. For women, internal factors explained 18.9% and 22.1% of the variances, with 3.1% and 4.2% added with inclusion of the external factors. In men, perceived drawbacks of health checks was a significant negative factor associated with likeliness to undergo CVD health checks (coefficient = -1.093; 95%CI:-1.592 to -0.594), and timeline for checks (coefficient = -0.533; 95%CI:-0.975 to -0.091). In women, readiness to handle outcomes following health checks was significantly associated with likeliness to undergo the checks (coefficient = 0.575; 95%CI: 0.063 to 1.087), and timeline for checks (coefficient = 0.645; 95%CI: 0.162 to 1.128). Both external factors 1) influence by significant others (coefficient = 0.406; 95%CI: 0.013 to 0.800) and 2) external barriers (coefficient = -0.440; 95%CI:-0.869 to -0.011) were also significantly associated with likeliness to undergo CVD health checks in women. Both men and women were influenced by internal factors in their intention to undergo CVD health checks, and women were also influenced by external factors. Interventions to encourage CVD health checks need to focus on internal factors and be gender sensitive.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0239679</identifier><identifier>PMID: 32970741</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>San Francisco: Public Library of Science</publisher><subject>Cardiovascular disease ; Cardiovascular diseases ; Coefficients ; Cross-sectional studies ; Diagnosis ; Disease prevention ; Gender ; Gender aspects ; Gender differences ; Health aspects ; Health behavior ; Health risks ; Health screening ; Heart diseases ; Likert scale ; Low income groups ; Medical screening ; Medicine ; Medicine and Health Sciences ; Men ; Methods ; People and Places ; Perceptions ; Polls &amp; surveys ; Primary care ; Questionnaires ; Regression analysis ; Risk factors ; Sex differences ; Sex differences (Psychology) ; Social aspects ; Supervision ; Surveys ; Women ; Womens health</subject><ispartof>PloS one, 2020-09, Vol.15 (9), p.e0239679-e0239679</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2020 Public Library of Science</rights><rights>2020 Cheong et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>2020 Cheong et al 2020 Cheong et al</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c669t-e9feac965316378f399fd0c4f5e76a62be8642745ce8baab32f84485973df4b33</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c669t-e9feac965316378f399fd0c4f5e76a62be8642745ce8baab32f84485973df4b33</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-3895-530X ; 0000-0003-3191-1264</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7514016/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7514016/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,864,885,2100,2926,23864,27922,27923,53789,53791,79370,79371</link.rule.ids></links><search><contributor>Pakpour, Amir H.</contributor><creatorcontrib>Cheong, Ai Theng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tong, Seng Fah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chinna, Karuthan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Khoo, Ee Ming</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liew, Su May</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pakpour, Amir H</creatorcontrib><title>Gender differences in factors influencing intention to undergo cardiovascular disease health checks: A cross-sectional survey</title><title>PloS one</title><description>Undergo a health check for cardiovascular disease (CVD) is an important strategy to improve cardiovascular (CV) health. Men are reported to be less likely to undergo cardiovascular disease (CVD) health check than women. Gender difference could be one of the factors influencing health seeking behaviour of men and women. We aimed to identify gender differences in factors influencing the intention to undergo CVD health checks. This was a cross-sectional survey using mall intercept interviews. Malaysians aged [greater than or equal to]30 years without known CVD were recruited. They were asked for their intention to undergo CVD health checks and associated factors. The factors included seven internal factors that were related to individuals' attitude, perception and preparedness for CVD health checks and two external factors that were related to external resources. Hierarchical ordinal regression analysis was used to evaluate the importance of the factors on intention to undergo CVD health checks, for men and women separately. 397 participants were recruited, 60% were women. For men, internal factors explained 31.6% of the variances in likeliness and 9.6% of the timeline to undergo CVD health checks, with 1.2% and 1.8% added respectively when external factors were sequentially included. For women, internal factors explained 18.9% and 22.1% of the variances, with 3.1% and 4.2% added with inclusion of the external factors. In men, perceived drawbacks of health checks was a significant negative factor associated with likeliness to undergo CVD health checks (coefficient = -1.093; 95%CI:-1.592 to -0.594), and timeline for checks (coefficient = -0.533; 95%CI:-0.975 to -0.091). In women, readiness to handle outcomes following health checks was significantly associated with likeliness to undergo the checks (coefficient = 0.575; 95%CI: 0.063 to 1.087), and timeline for checks (coefficient = 0.645; 95%CI: 0.162 to 1.128). Both external factors 1) influence by significant others (coefficient = 0.406; 95%CI: 0.013 to 0.800) and 2) external barriers (coefficient = -0.440; 95%CI:-0.869 to -0.011) were also significantly associated with likeliness to undergo CVD health checks in women. Both men and women were influenced by internal factors in their intention to undergo CVD health checks, and women were also influenced by external factors. Interventions to encourage CVD health checks need to focus on internal factors and be gender sensitive.</description><subject>Cardiovascular disease</subject><subject>Cardiovascular diseases</subject><subject>Coefficients</subject><subject>Cross-sectional studies</subject><subject>Diagnosis</subject><subject>Disease prevention</subject><subject>Gender</subject><subject>Gender aspects</subject><subject>Gender differences</subject><subject>Health aspects</subject><subject>Health behavior</subject><subject>Health risks</subject><subject>Health screening</subject><subject>Heart diseases</subject><subject>Likert scale</subject><subject>Low income groups</subject><subject>Medical screening</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine and Health Sciences</subject><subject>Men</subject><subject>Methods</subject><subject>People and Places</subject><subject>Perceptions</subject><subject>Polls &amp; surveys</subject><subject>Primary care</subject><subject>Questionnaires</subject><subject>Regression analysis</subject><subject>Risk factors</subject><subject>Sex differences</subject><subject>Sex differences (Psychology)</subject><subject>Social aspects</subject><subject>Supervision</subject><subject>Surveys</subject><subject>Women</subject><subject>Womens health</subject><issn>1932-6203</issn><issn>1932-6203</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNqNk9-L1DAQx4so3rn6HwgWBNGHrm3zq_FBWA49Fw4O_PUa0nTSzZpt9pJ28R783013q1zlHiQPGSaf-SYzmUmS50W-LBAr3m7d4Dtpl3vXwTIvEaeMP0jOC47KjJY5enjHPkuehLDNc4IqSh8nZ6jkLGe4OE9-XULXgE8bozV46BSE1HSplqp3fjS1HaLXdG20e-h647q0d-kwRrUuVdI3xh1kUIOVo0wAGSDdgLT9JlUbUD_Cu3SVKu9CyAKoUUDaNAz-ALdPk0da2gDPpn2RfPv44evFp-zq-nJ9sbrKFKW8z4BrkIpTggqKWKUR57rJFdYEGJW0rKGiuGSYKKhqKWtU6grjinCGGo1rhBbJi5Pu3rogpsoFUWJMOCkYGYn1iWic3Iq9Nzvpb4WTRhwdzrdC-t4oCwLXhGCmawy1wripa0VkSRhhTFFc4CZqvZ9uG-odNCpWzUs7E52fdGYjWncQjBQ4jykukteTgHc3A4Re7ExQYK3swA3Hd1NKK1rxiL78B70_u4lqZUwgfqqL96pRVKwoiq8mVZVHankPFVcDO6Nim2kT_bOAN7OAyPTws2_lEIJYf_n8_-z19zn76g576qXg7DD2TpiD-AQe28uD_lvkIhfjlPyphhinRExTgn4D07gFWw</recordid><startdate>20200924</startdate><enddate>20200924</enddate><creator>Cheong, Ai Theng</creator><creator>Tong, Seng Fah</creator><creator>Chinna, Karuthan</creator><creator>Khoo, Ee Ming</creator><creator>Liew, Su May</creator><creator>Pakpour, Amir H</creator><general>Public Library of Science</general><general>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>IOV</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3895-530X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3191-1264</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20200924</creationdate><title>Gender differences in factors influencing intention to undergo cardiovascular disease health checks: A cross-sectional survey</title><author>Cheong, Ai Theng ; Tong, Seng Fah ; Chinna, Karuthan ; Khoo, Ee Ming ; Liew, Su May ; Pakpour, Amir H</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c669t-e9feac965316378f399fd0c4f5e76a62be8642745ce8baab32f84485973df4b33</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Cardiovascular disease</topic><topic>Cardiovascular diseases</topic><topic>Coefficients</topic><topic>Cross-sectional studies</topic><topic>Diagnosis</topic><topic>Disease prevention</topic><topic>Gender</topic><topic>Gender aspects</topic><topic>Gender differences</topic><topic>Health aspects</topic><topic>Health behavior</topic><topic>Health risks</topic><topic>Health screening</topic><topic>Heart diseases</topic><topic>Likert scale</topic><topic>Low income groups</topic><topic>Medical screening</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine and Health Sciences</topic><topic>Men</topic><topic>Methods</topic><topic>People and Places</topic><topic>Perceptions</topic><topic>Polls &amp; surveys</topic><topic>Primary care</topic><topic>Questionnaires</topic><topic>Regression analysis</topic><topic>Risk factors</topic><topic>Sex differences</topic><topic>Sex differences (Psychology)</topic><topic>Social aspects</topic><topic>Supervision</topic><topic>Surveys</topic><topic>Women</topic><topic>Womens health</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Cheong, Ai Theng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tong, Seng Fah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chinna, Karuthan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Khoo, Ee Ming</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liew, Su May</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pakpour, Amir H</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Opposing Viewpoints</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection (ProQuest)</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Materials Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Cheong, Ai Theng</au><au>Tong, Seng Fah</au><au>Chinna, Karuthan</au><au>Khoo, Ee Ming</au><au>Liew, Su May</au><au>Pakpour, Amir H</au><au>Pakpour, Amir H.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Gender differences in factors influencing intention to undergo cardiovascular disease health checks: A cross-sectional survey</atitle><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle><date>2020-09-24</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>15</volume><issue>9</issue><spage>e0239679</spage><epage>e0239679</epage><pages>e0239679-e0239679</pages><issn>1932-6203</issn><eissn>1932-6203</eissn><abstract>Undergo a health check for cardiovascular disease (CVD) is an important strategy to improve cardiovascular (CV) health. Men are reported to be less likely to undergo cardiovascular disease (CVD) health check than women. Gender difference could be one of the factors influencing health seeking behaviour of men and women. We aimed to identify gender differences in factors influencing the intention to undergo CVD health checks. This was a cross-sectional survey using mall intercept interviews. Malaysians aged [greater than or equal to]30 years without known CVD were recruited. They were asked for their intention to undergo CVD health checks and associated factors. The factors included seven internal factors that were related to individuals' attitude, perception and preparedness for CVD health checks and two external factors that were related to external resources. Hierarchical ordinal regression analysis was used to evaluate the importance of the factors on intention to undergo CVD health checks, for men and women separately. 397 participants were recruited, 60% were women. For men, internal factors explained 31.6% of the variances in likeliness and 9.6% of the timeline to undergo CVD health checks, with 1.2% and 1.8% added respectively when external factors were sequentially included. For women, internal factors explained 18.9% and 22.1% of the variances, with 3.1% and 4.2% added with inclusion of the external factors. In men, perceived drawbacks of health checks was a significant negative factor associated with likeliness to undergo CVD health checks (coefficient = -1.093; 95%CI:-1.592 to -0.594), and timeline for checks (coefficient = -0.533; 95%CI:-0.975 to -0.091). In women, readiness to handle outcomes following health checks was significantly associated with likeliness to undergo the checks (coefficient = 0.575; 95%CI: 0.063 to 1.087), and timeline for checks (coefficient = 0.645; 95%CI: 0.162 to 1.128). Both external factors 1) influence by significant others (coefficient = 0.406; 95%CI: 0.013 to 0.800) and 2) external barriers (coefficient = -0.440; 95%CI:-0.869 to -0.011) were also significantly associated with likeliness to undergo CVD health checks in women. Both men and women were influenced by internal factors in their intention to undergo CVD health checks, and women were also influenced by external factors. Interventions to encourage CVD health checks need to focus on internal factors and be gender sensitive.</abstract><cop>San Francisco</cop><pub>Public Library of Science</pub><pmid>32970741</pmid><doi>10.1371/journal.pone.0239679</doi><tpages>e0239679</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3895-530X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3191-1264</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1932-6203
ispartof PloS one, 2020-09, Vol.15 (9), p.e0239679-e0239679
issn 1932-6203
1932-6203
language eng
recordid cdi_plos_journals_2445951753
source DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Public Library of Science (PLoS); EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central; Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry
subjects Cardiovascular disease
Cardiovascular diseases
Coefficients
Cross-sectional studies
Diagnosis
Disease prevention
Gender
Gender aspects
Gender differences
Health aspects
Health behavior
Health risks
Health screening
Heart diseases
Likert scale
Low income groups
Medical screening
Medicine
Medicine and Health Sciences
Men
Methods
People and Places
Perceptions
Polls & surveys
Primary care
Questionnaires
Regression analysis
Risk factors
Sex differences
Sex differences (Psychology)
Social aspects
Supervision
Surveys
Women
Womens health
title Gender differences in factors influencing intention to undergo cardiovascular disease health checks: A cross-sectional survey
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-13T13%3A58%3A22IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_plos_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Gender%20differences%20in%20factors%20influencing%20intention%20to%20undergo%20cardiovascular%20disease%20health%20checks:%20A%20cross-sectional%20survey&rft.jtitle=PloS%20one&rft.au=Cheong,%20Ai%20Theng&rft.date=2020-09-24&rft.volume=15&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=e0239679&rft.epage=e0239679&rft.pages=e0239679-e0239679&rft.issn=1932-6203&rft.eissn=1932-6203&rft_id=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0239679&rft_dat=%3Cgale_plos_%3EA636415880%3C/gale_plos_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2445951753&rft_id=info:pmid/32970741&rft_galeid=A636415880&rft_doaj_id=oai_doaj_org_article_4b5547fb4ebc44dbbc5a257577c6414d&rfr_iscdi=true