The infant mummy’s face—Paleoradiological investigation and comparison between facial reconstruction and mummy portrait of a Roman-period Egyptian child

In Graeco-Roman times in the Lower-Egyptian Fayoum region, a painted portrait was traditionally placed over the face of a deceased individual. These mummy portraits show considerable inter-individual diversity. This suggests that those portraits were created separately for each individual. In the pr...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:PloS one 2020-09, Vol.15 (9), p.e0238427-e0238427
Hauptverfasser: Nerlich, Andreas G, Fischer, Lukas, Panzer, Stephanie, Bicker, Roxane, Helmberger, Thomas, Schoske, Sylvia
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page e0238427
container_issue 9
container_start_page e0238427
container_title PloS one
container_volume 15
creator Nerlich, Andreas G
Fischer, Lukas
Panzer, Stephanie
Bicker, Roxane
Helmberger, Thomas
Schoske, Sylvia
description In Graeco-Roman times in the Lower-Egyptian Fayoum region, a painted portrait was traditionally placed over the face of a deceased individual. These mummy portraits show considerable inter-individual diversity. This suggests that those portraits were created separately for each individual. In the present study, we investigated a completely wrapped young infant mummy with a typical mummy portrait by whole body CT analysis. This was used to obtain physical information on the infant and provided the basis for a virtual face reconstruction in order to compare it to the mummy portrait. We identified the mummy as a 3-4 years old male infant that had been prepared according to the typical ancient Egyptian mummification rites. It most probably suffered from a right-sided pulmonary infection which may also be the cause of death. The reconstructed face showed considerable similarities to the portrait, confirming the portrait's specificity to this individual. However, there are some differences between portrait and face. The portrait seems to show a slightly older individual which may be due to artistic conventions of that period.
doi_str_mv 10.1371/journal.pone.0238427
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_plos_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_plos_journals_2443447727</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A635642690</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_c3803b68f8ba4dcb980c8f51e8d7029b</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A635642690</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c669t-57ddc571051a3e5b3d0dbcb845ce07625c342931ebec40175dd392da6c6159083</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNk81u1DAQxyMEoqXwBkhEQkJw2MWJHce5IFVVgZUqFZXC1XLsSdaVYwfbKeytD8EFiafrk-DtLlUX9YB88Ndv_jOe8WTZ8wLNC1wXby_c5K0w89FZmKMSM1LWD7L9osHljJYIP7yz3suehHCBUIUZpY-zPVw2mLKC7me_z5eQa9sJG_NhGobV9dWvkHdCwvXVz0_CgPNCaWdcr6UwibyEEHUvonY2F1bl0g2j8DqkbQvxO4BdW-vEepDOhugneQvfeMhH56MXOuauy0V-5gZhZyN47VR-3K_GqIXN5VIb9TR71AkT4Nl2Psi-vD8-P_o4Ozn9sDg6PJlJSps4q2qlZFUXqCoEhqrFCqlWtoxUElBNy0pikh5cQAuSoKKulMJNqQSVtKgaxPBB9mKjOxoX-DaxgZeEYELquqwTsdgQyokLPno9CL_iTmh-c-B8z4WPWhrgEjOEW8o61gqiZNswJFlXFcBUjcqmTVrvtt6mdgAlwaZsmB3R3Rurl7x3l7wmDUFsHczrrYB336ZUDz7oIMEYYcFNm7gZQ1VFE_ryH_T-122pPhWcp9_gkl-5FuWHFFeUlLRBiZrfQ6WhYNCp1NDpdL5j8GbHIDERfsReTCHwxeez_2dPv-6yr-6wSxAmLoMz0_qbhV2QbEDpXQgeutskF4ivm-hvNvi6ifi2ifAfSwUSmg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2443447727</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The infant mummy’s face—Paleoradiological investigation and comparison between facial reconstruction and mummy portrait of a Roman-period Egyptian child</title><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Public Library of Science (PLoS) Journals Open Access</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry</source><creator>Nerlich, Andreas G ; Fischer, Lukas ; Panzer, Stephanie ; Bicker, Roxane ; Helmberger, Thomas ; Schoske, Sylvia</creator><contributor>Caramelli, David</contributor><creatorcontrib>Nerlich, Andreas G ; Fischer, Lukas ; Panzer, Stephanie ; Bicker, Roxane ; Helmberger, Thomas ; Schoske, Sylvia ; Caramelli, David</creatorcontrib><description>In Graeco-Roman times in the Lower-Egyptian Fayoum region, a painted portrait was traditionally placed over the face of a deceased individual. These mummy portraits show considerable inter-individual diversity. This suggests that those portraits were created separately for each individual. In the present study, we investigated a completely wrapped young infant mummy with a typical mummy portrait by whole body CT analysis. This was used to obtain physical information on the infant and provided the basis for a virtual face reconstruction in order to compare it to the mummy portrait. We identified the mummy as a 3-4 years old male infant that had been prepared according to the typical ancient Egyptian mummification rites. It most probably suffered from a right-sided pulmonary infection which may also be the cause of death. The reconstructed face showed considerable similarities to the portrait, confirming the portrait's specificity to this individual. However, there are some differences between portrait and face. The portrait seems to show a slightly older individual which may be due to artistic conventions of that period.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0238427</identifier><identifier>PMID: 32936816</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>San Francisco: Public Library of Science</publisher><subject>Age ; Anthropological research ; Biology and Life Sciences ; Egyptian civilization ; Face ; Facial reconstruction (Forensic science) ; Greco-Roman Egypt, 332 BC-642 AD ; Hair ; Image reconstruction ; Infants ; Medicine and Health Sciences ; Methods ; Mouth ; Mummies ; Museums ; Observations ; Physiological aspects ; Portraits ; Radiology ; Rites, ceremonies and celebrations ; Skin ; Skull ; X-rays</subject><ispartof>PloS one, 2020-09, Vol.15 (9), p.e0238427-e0238427</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2020 Public Library of Science</rights><rights>2020 Nerlich et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>2020 Nerlich et al 2020 Nerlich et al</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c669t-57ddc571051a3e5b3d0dbcb845ce07625c342931ebec40175dd392da6c6159083</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c669t-57ddc571051a3e5b3d0dbcb845ce07625c342931ebec40175dd392da6c6159083</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-6562-1017</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7494087/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7494087/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,864,885,2102,2928,23866,27924,27925,53791,53793,79600,79601</link.rule.ids></links><search><contributor>Caramelli, David</contributor><creatorcontrib>Nerlich, Andreas G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fischer, Lukas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Panzer, Stephanie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bicker, Roxane</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Helmberger, Thomas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schoske, Sylvia</creatorcontrib><title>The infant mummy’s face—Paleoradiological investigation and comparison between facial reconstruction and mummy portrait of a Roman-period Egyptian child</title><title>PloS one</title><description>In Graeco-Roman times in the Lower-Egyptian Fayoum region, a painted portrait was traditionally placed over the face of a deceased individual. These mummy portraits show considerable inter-individual diversity. This suggests that those portraits were created separately for each individual. In the present study, we investigated a completely wrapped young infant mummy with a typical mummy portrait by whole body CT analysis. This was used to obtain physical information on the infant and provided the basis for a virtual face reconstruction in order to compare it to the mummy portrait. We identified the mummy as a 3-4 years old male infant that had been prepared according to the typical ancient Egyptian mummification rites. It most probably suffered from a right-sided pulmonary infection which may also be the cause of death. The reconstructed face showed considerable similarities to the portrait, confirming the portrait's specificity to this individual. However, there are some differences between portrait and face. The portrait seems to show a slightly older individual which may be due to artistic conventions of that period.</description><subject>Age</subject><subject>Anthropological research</subject><subject>Biology and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Egyptian civilization</subject><subject>Face</subject><subject>Facial reconstruction (Forensic science)</subject><subject>Greco-Roman Egypt, 332 BC-642 AD</subject><subject>Hair</subject><subject>Image reconstruction</subject><subject>Infants</subject><subject>Medicine and Health Sciences</subject><subject>Methods</subject><subject>Mouth</subject><subject>Mummies</subject><subject>Museums</subject><subject>Observations</subject><subject>Physiological aspects</subject><subject>Portraits</subject><subject>Radiology</subject><subject>Rites, ceremonies and celebrations</subject><subject>Skin</subject><subject>Skull</subject><subject>X-rays</subject><issn>1932-6203</issn><issn>1932-6203</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNqNk81u1DAQxyMEoqXwBkhEQkJw2MWJHce5IFVVgZUqFZXC1XLsSdaVYwfbKeytD8EFiafrk-DtLlUX9YB88Ndv_jOe8WTZ8wLNC1wXby_c5K0w89FZmKMSM1LWD7L9osHljJYIP7yz3suehHCBUIUZpY-zPVw2mLKC7me_z5eQa9sJG_NhGobV9dWvkHdCwvXVz0_CgPNCaWdcr6UwibyEEHUvonY2F1bl0g2j8DqkbQvxO4BdW-vEepDOhugneQvfeMhH56MXOuauy0V-5gZhZyN47VR-3K_GqIXN5VIb9TR71AkT4Nl2Psi-vD8-P_o4Ozn9sDg6PJlJSps4q2qlZFUXqCoEhqrFCqlWtoxUElBNy0pikh5cQAuSoKKulMJNqQSVtKgaxPBB9mKjOxoX-DaxgZeEYELquqwTsdgQyokLPno9CL_iTmh-c-B8z4WPWhrgEjOEW8o61gqiZNswJFlXFcBUjcqmTVrvtt6mdgAlwaZsmB3R3Rurl7x3l7wmDUFsHczrrYB336ZUDz7oIMEYYcFNm7gZQ1VFE_ryH_T-122pPhWcp9_gkl-5FuWHFFeUlLRBiZrfQ6WhYNCp1NDpdL5j8GbHIDERfsReTCHwxeez_2dPv-6yr-6wSxAmLoMz0_qbhV2QbEDpXQgeutskF4ivm-hvNvi6ifi2ifAfSwUSmg</recordid><startdate>20200916</startdate><enddate>20200916</enddate><creator>Nerlich, Andreas G</creator><creator>Fischer, Lukas</creator><creator>Panzer, Stephanie</creator><creator>Bicker, Roxane</creator><creator>Helmberger, Thomas</creator><creator>Schoske, Sylvia</creator><general>Public Library of Science</general><general>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>IOV</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6562-1017</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20200916</creationdate><title>The infant mummy’s face—Paleoradiological investigation and comparison between facial reconstruction and mummy portrait of a Roman-period Egyptian child</title><author>Nerlich, Andreas G ; Fischer, Lukas ; Panzer, Stephanie ; Bicker, Roxane ; Helmberger, Thomas ; Schoske, Sylvia</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c669t-57ddc571051a3e5b3d0dbcb845ce07625c342931ebec40175dd392da6c6159083</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Age</topic><topic>Anthropological research</topic><topic>Biology and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Egyptian civilization</topic><topic>Face</topic><topic>Facial reconstruction (Forensic science)</topic><topic>Greco-Roman Egypt, 332 BC-642 AD</topic><topic>Hair</topic><topic>Image reconstruction</topic><topic>Infants</topic><topic>Medicine and Health Sciences</topic><topic>Methods</topic><topic>Mouth</topic><topic>Mummies</topic><topic>Museums</topic><topic>Observations</topic><topic>Physiological aspects</topic><topic>Portraits</topic><topic>Radiology</topic><topic>Rites, ceremonies and celebrations</topic><topic>Skin</topic><topic>Skull</topic><topic>X-rays</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Nerlich, Andreas G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fischer, Lukas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Panzer, Stephanie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bicker, Roxane</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Helmberger, Thomas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schoske, Sylvia</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Opposing Viewpoints</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Proquest Nursing &amp; Allied Health Source</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Materials Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Nerlich, Andreas G</au><au>Fischer, Lukas</au><au>Panzer, Stephanie</au><au>Bicker, Roxane</au><au>Helmberger, Thomas</au><au>Schoske, Sylvia</au><au>Caramelli, David</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The infant mummy’s face—Paleoradiological investigation and comparison between facial reconstruction and mummy portrait of a Roman-period Egyptian child</atitle><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle><date>2020-09-16</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>15</volume><issue>9</issue><spage>e0238427</spage><epage>e0238427</epage><pages>e0238427-e0238427</pages><issn>1932-6203</issn><eissn>1932-6203</eissn><abstract>In Graeco-Roman times in the Lower-Egyptian Fayoum region, a painted portrait was traditionally placed over the face of a deceased individual. These mummy portraits show considerable inter-individual diversity. This suggests that those portraits were created separately for each individual. In the present study, we investigated a completely wrapped young infant mummy with a typical mummy portrait by whole body CT analysis. This was used to obtain physical information on the infant and provided the basis for a virtual face reconstruction in order to compare it to the mummy portrait. We identified the mummy as a 3-4 years old male infant that had been prepared according to the typical ancient Egyptian mummification rites. It most probably suffered from a right-sided pulmonary infection which may also be the cause of death. The reconstructed face showed considerable similarities to the portrait, confirming the portrait's specificity to this individual. However, there are some differences between portrait and face. The portrait seems to show a slightly older individual which may be due to artistic conventions of that period.</abstract><cop>San Francisco</cop><pub>Public Library of Science</pub><pmid>32936816</pmid><doi>10.1371/journal.pone.0238427</doi><tpages>e0238427</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6562-1017</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1932-6203
ispartof PloS one, 2020-09, Vol.15 (9), p.e0238427-e0238427
issn 1932-6203
1932-6203
language eng
recordid cdi_plos_journals_2443447727
source DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Public Library of Science (PLoS) Journals Open Access; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central; Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry
subjects Age
Anthropological research
Biology and Life Sciences
Egyptian civilization
Face
Facial reconstruction (Forensic science)
Greco-Roman Egypt, 332 BC-642 AD
Hair
Image reconstruction
Infants
Medicine and Health Sciences
Methods
Mouth
Mummies
Museums
Observations
Physiological aspects
Portraits
Radiology
Rites, ceremonies and celebrations
Skin
Skull
X-rays
title The infant mummy’s face—Paleoradiological investigation and comparison between facial reconstruction and mummy portrait of a Roman-period Egyptian child
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-27T08%3A33%3A21IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_plos_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20infant%20mummy%E2%80%99s%20face%E2%80%94Paleoradiological%20investigation%20and%20comparison%20between%20facial%20reconstruction%20and%20mummy%20portrait%20of%20a%20Roman-period%20Egyptian%20child&rft.jtitle=PloS%20one&rft.au=Nerlich,%20Andreas%20G&rft.date=2020-09-16&rft.volume=15&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=e0238427&rft.epage=e0238427&rft.pages=e0238427-e0238427&rft.issn=1932-6203&rft.eissn=1932-6203&rft_id=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0238427&rft_dat=%3Cgale_plos_%3EA635642690%3C/gale_plos_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2443447727&rft_id=info:pmid/32936816&rft_galeid=A635642690&rft_doaj_id=oai_doaj_org_article_c3803b68f8ba4dcb980c8f51e8d7029b&rfr_iscdi=true