Relationship quality and mental health during COVID-19 lockdown
Catastrophes are known to have an impact on relationships as well as on mental health. This study evaluated differences in several mental health and well-being measures according to relationship quality during the Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19) pandemic and related lockdown measures. A cross-section...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | PloS one 2020-09, Vol.15 (9), p.e0238906 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 9 |
| container_start_page | e0238906 |
| container_title | PloS one |
| container_volume | 15 |
| creator | Pieh, Christoph O Rourke, Teresa Budimir, Sanja Probst, Thomas |
| description | Catastrophes are known to have an impact on relationships as well as on mental health. This study evaluated differences in several mental health and well-being measures according to relationship quality during the Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19) pandemic and related lockdown measures. A cross-sectional online survey was launched four weeks after lockdown measures were implemented in Austria. Relationship quality was measured with the Quality of Marriage Index (QMI), and mental health measures included quality of life (WHO-QOL BREF psychological domain), well-being (WHO-5), depression (PHQ-9), anxiety (GAD-7), stress (PSS-10), and sleep quality (ISI). ANOVAs with Bonferroni-corrected post-hoc tests and Chisquared tests were applied. In all mental health scales, individuals with good relationship quality (n = 543) scored better than individuals with poor relationship quality (n = 190) or without relationship (n = 272). The odds ratios (OR) between the poor and good relationship quality groups were 3.5 for the PHQ-9, 3.4 for the GAD-7, and 2.0 for the ISI. Additionally, individuals without no relationship scored better on all scales than individuals with poor relationship quality (all p-values < .05). Relationship quality was related to mental health during COVID-19. The prevalence of depressive symptoms increased according to relationship quality from 13% up to 35%. Relationship per se was not associated with better mental health, but the quality of the relationship was essential. Compared to no relationship, a good relationship quality was a protective factor whereas a poor relationship quality was a risk factor. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1371/journal.pone.0238906 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_plos_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_plos_journals_2441872293</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A635163991</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_0a8e5dfacf884e369173ea19b83f324e</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A635163991</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-8c75477345c610b56cd5d0d96e68d2fb2029f96bb2416c3b79103b19eac006033</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkl1v0zAUhi0EYlvhHyCIhITgIsUfiT9uQFP5qjSp0oDdWo7ttC5u3MXJYP8et82mBu0C-cLW8XPe43P8AvACwSkiDL1fh75tlJ9uQ2OnEBMuIH0ETpEgOKcYksdH5xNwFuMawpJwSp-CE4IFKjnjp-DjpfWqc6GJK7fNrnvlXXebqcZkG9t0ymcrq3y3ykzfumaZzRZX8085EpkP-pcJv5tn4EmtfLTPh30Cfn75_GP2Lb9YfJ3Pzi9yTQXucq5ZWTBGilJTBKuSalMaaAS1lBtcVxhiUQtaVbhAVJOKCQRJhYRVGkIKCZmAVwfdrQ9RDr1HiYsCcYax2BHzA2GCWstt6zaqvZVBObkPhHYpVds57a2EitvS1ErXnBeWUIEYsQqJipOa4BSZgA9Dtb7aWKPTKFrlR6Ljm8at5DLcSFbwkjGUBN4OAm247m3s5MZFbb1XjQ39_t0YQ8ZT4Ql4_Q_6cHcDtVSpAdfUIdXVO1F5TkmJKBFiV3b6AJWWsRunk1Fql-KjhHejhMR09k-3VH2Mcv798v_ZxdWYfXPEHjwUg-_3ThuDxQHUbYixtfX9kBGUO5_fTUPufC4Hn6e0l8cfdJ90Z2zyF_9H9X4</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2441872293</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Relationship quality and mental health during COVID-19 lockdown</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry</source><creator>Pieh, Christoph ; O Rourke, Teresa ; Budimir, Sanja ; Probst, Thomas</creator><contributor>Montazeri, Ali</contributor><creatorcontrib>Pieh, Christoph ; O Rourke, Teresa ; Budimir, Sanja ; Probst, Thomas ; Montazeri, Ali</creatorcontrib><description>Catastrophes are known to have an impact on relationships as well as on mental health. This study evaluated differences in several mental health and well-being measures according to relationship quality during the Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19) pandemic and related lockdown measures. A cross-sectional online survey was launched four weeks after lockdown measures were implemented in Austria. Relationship quality was measured with the Quality of Marriage Index (QMI), and mental health measures included quality of life (WHO-QOL BREF psychological domain), well-being (WHO-5), depression (PHQ-9), anxiety (GAD-7), stress (PSS-10), and sleep quality (ISI). ANOVAs with Bonferroni-corrected post-hoc tests and Chisquared tests were applied. In all mental health scales, individuals with good relationship quality (n = 543) scored better than individuals with poor relationship quality (n = 190) or without relationship (n = 272). The odds ratios (OR) between the poor and good relationship quality groups were 3.5 for the PHQ-9, 3.4 for the GAD-7, and 2.0 for the ISI. Additionally, individuals without no relationship scored better on all scales than individuals with poor relationship quality (all p-values < .05). Relationship quality was related to mental health during COVID-19. The prevalence of depressive symptoms increased according to relationship quality from 13% up to 35%. Relationship per se was not associated with better mental health, but the quality of the relationship was essential. Compared to no relationship, a good relationship quality was a protective factor whereas a poor relationship quality was a risk factor.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0238906</identifier><identifier>PMID: 32915878</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Public Library of Science</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Adult ; Aged ; Anxiety ; Anxiety disorders ; Austria ; Biology and Life Sciences ; Care and treatment ; Coronavirus Infections - epidemiology ; Coronavirus Infections - prevention & control ; Coronavirus Infections - psychology ; Coronaviruses ; COVID-19 ; Depression (Mood disorder) ; Disasters ; Disease transmission ; Divorce ; Family Relations ; Female ; Gender ; Health aspects ; Humans ; Insomnia ; Interpersonal Relations ; Male ; Marriage ; Medicine and Health Sciences ; Mental depression ; Mental health ; Mental Health - statistics & numerical data ; Middle Aged ; Pandemics ; Pandemics - prevention & control ; Pneumonia, Viral - epidemiology ; Pneumonia, Viral - prevention & control ; Pneumonia, Viral - psychology ; Population ; Psychological aspects ; Psychotherapy ; Quality of life ; Quarantine ; Quarantine - psychology ; Questionnaires ; Risk analysis ; Risk factors ; Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 ; Shelter in place ; Signs and symptoms ; Sleep ; Social aspects ; Social distancing ; Social Isolation ; Social Sciences ; Socioeconomic Factors ; Stay-at-home orders (Public safety) ; Stress ; Viral diseases ; Well being</subject><ispartof>PloS one, 2020-09, Vol.15 (9), p.e0238906</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2020 Public Library of Science</rights><rights>2020 Pieh et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>2020 Pieh et al 2020 Pieh et al</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-8c75477345c610b56cd5d0d96e68d2fb2029f96bb2416c3b79103b19eac006033</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-8c75477345c610b56cd5d0d96e68d2fb2029f96bb2416c3b79103b19eac006033</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-2708-303X ; 0000-0002-4110-9112</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7485771/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7485771/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,864,885,2102,2928,23866,27924,27925,53791,53793</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32915878$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Montazeri, Ali</contributor><creatorcontrib>Pieh, Christoph</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>O Rourke, Teresa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Budimir, Sanja</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Probst, Thomas</creatorcontrib><title>Relationship quality and mental health during COVID-19 lockdown</title><title>PloS one</title><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><description>Catastrophes are known to have an impact on relationships as well as on mental health. This study evaluated differences in several mental health and well-being measures according to relationship quality during the Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19) pandemic and related lockdown measures. A cross-sectional online survey was launched four weeks after lockdown measures were implemented in Austria. Relationship quality was measured with the Quality of Marriage Index (QMI), and mental health measures included quality of life (WHO-QOL BREF psychological domain), well-being (WHO-5), depression (PHQ-9), anxiety (GAD-7), stress (PSS-10), and sleep quality (ISI). ANOVAs with Bonferroni-corrected post-hoc tests and Chisquared tests were applied. In all mental health scales, individuals with good relationship quality (n = 543) scored better than individuals with poor relationship quality (n = 190) or without relationship (n = 272). The odds ratios (OR) between the poor and good relationship quality groups were 3.5 for the PHQ-9, 3.4 for the GAD-7, and 2.0 for the ISI. Additionally, individuals without no relationship scored better on all scales than individuals with poor relationship quality (all p-values < .05). Relationship quality was related to mental health during COVID-19. The prevalence of depressive symptoms increased according to relationship quality from 13% up to 35%. Relationship per se was not associated with better mental health, but the quality of the relationship was essential. Compared to no relationship, a good relationship quality was a protective factor whereas a poor relationship quality was a risk factor.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Anxiety</subject><subject>Anxiety disorders</subject><subject>Austria</subject><subject>Biology and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Care and treatment</subject><subject>Coronavirus Infections - epidemiology</subject><subject>Coronavirus Infections - prevention & control</subject><subject>Coronavirus Infections - psychology</subject><subject>Coronaviruses</subject><subject>COVID-19</subject><subject>Depression (Mood disorder)</subject><subject>Disasters</subject><subject>Disease transmission</subject><subject>Divorce</subject><subject>Family Relations</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Gender</subject><subject>Health aspects</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Insomnia</subject><subject>Interpersonal Relations</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Marriage</subject><subject>Medicine and Health Sciences</subject><subject>Mental depression</subject><subject>Mental health</subject><subject>Mental Health - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Pandemics</subject><subject>Pandemics - prevention & control</subject><subject>Pneumonia, Viral - epidemiology</subject><subject>Pneumonia, Viral - prevention & control</subject><subject>Pneumonia, Viral - psychology</subject><subject>Population</subject><subject>Psychological aspects</subject><subject>Psychotherapy</subject><subject>Quality of life</subject><subject>Quarantine</subject><subject>Quarantine - psychology</subject><subject>Questionnaires</subject><subject>Risk analysis</subject><subject>Risk factors</subject><subject>Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2</subject><subject>Shelter in place</subject><subject>Signs and symptoms</subject><subject>Sleep</subject><subject>Social aspects</subject><subject>Social distancing</subject><subject>Social Isolation</subject><subject>Social Sciences</subject><subject>Socioeconomic Factors</subject><subject>Stay-at-home orders (Public safety)</subject><subject>Stress</subject><subject>Viral diseases</subject><subject>Well being</subject><issn>1932-6203</issn><issn>1932-6203</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkl1v0zAUhi0EYlvhHyCIhITgIsUfiT9uQFP5qjSp0oDdWo7ttC5u3MXJYP8et82mBu0C-cLW8XPe43P8AvACwSkiDL1fh75tlJ9uQ2OnEBMuIH0ETpEgOKcYksdH5xNwFuMawpJwSp-CE4IFKjnjp-DjpfWqc6GJK7fNrnvlXXebqcZkG9t0ymcrq3y3ykzfumaZzRZX8085EpkP-pcJv5tn4EmtfLTPh30Cfn75_GP2Lb9YfJ3Pzi9yTQXucq5ZWTBGilJTBKuSalMaaAS1lBtcVxhiUQtaVbhAVJOKCQRJhYRVGkIKCZmAVwfdrQ9RDr1HiYsCcYax2BHzA2GCWstt6zaqvZVBObkPhHYpVds57a2EitvS1ErXnBeWUIEYsQqJipOa4BSZgA9Dtb7aWKPTKFrlR6Ljm8at5DLcSFbwkjGUBN4OAm247m3s5MZFbb1XjQ39_t0YQ8ZT4Ql4_Q_6cHcDtVSpAdfUIdXVO1F5TkmJKBFiV3b6AJWWsRunk1Fql-KjhHejhMR09k-3VH2Mcv798v_ZxdWYfXPEHjwUg-_3ThuDxQHUbYixtfX9kBGUO5_fTUPufC4Hn6e0l8cfdJ90Z2zyF_9H9X4</recordid><startdate>20200911</startdate><enddate>20200911</enddate><creator>Pieh, Christoph</creator><creator>O Rourke, Teresa</creator><creator>Budimir, Sanja</creator><creator>Probst, Thomas</creator><general>Public Library of Science</general><general>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>IOV</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>COVID</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2708-303X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4110-9112</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20200911</creationdate><title>Relationship quality and mental health during COVID-19 lockdown</title><author>Pieh, Christoph ; O Rourke, Teresa ; Budimir, Sanja ; Probst, Thomas</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-8c75477345c610b56cd5d0d96e68d2fb2029f96bb2416c3b79103b19eac006033</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Anxiety</topic><topic>Anxiety disorders</topic><topic>Austria</topic><topic>Biology and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Care and treatment</topic><topic>Coronavirus Infections - epidemiology</topic><topic>Coronavirus Infections - prevention & control</topic><topic>Coronavirus Infections - psychology</topic><topic>Coronaviruses</topic><topic>COVID-19</topic><topic>Depression (Mood disorder)</topic><topic>Disasters</topic><topic>Disease transmission</topic><topic>Divorce</topic><topic>Family Relations</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Gender</topic><topic>Health aspects</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Insomnia</topic><topic>Interpersonal Relations</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Marriage</topic><topic>Medicine and Health Sciences</topic><topic>Mental depression</topic><topic>Mental health</topic><topic>Mental Health - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Pandemics</topic><topic>Pandemics - prevention & control</topic><topic>Pneumonia, Viral - epidemiology</topic><topic>Pneumonia, Viral - prevention & control</topic><topic>Pneumonia, Viral - psychology</topic><topic>Population</topic><topic>Psychological aspects</topic><topic>Psychotherapy</topic><topic>Quality of life</topic><topic>Quarantine</topic><topic>Quarantine - psychology</topic><topic>Questionnaires</topic><topic>Risk analysis</topic><topic>Risk factors</topic><topic>Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2</topic><topic>Shelter in place</topic><topic>Signs and symptoms</topic><topic>Sleep</topic><topic>Social aspects</topic><topic>Social distancing</topic><topic>Social Isolation</topic><topic>Social Sciences</topic><topic>Socioeconomic Factors</topic><topic>Stay-at-home orders (Public safety)</topic><topic>Stress</topic><topic>Viral diseases</topic><topic>Well being</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Pieh, Christoph</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>O Rourke, Teresa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Budimir, Sanja</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Probst, Thomas</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Opposing Viewpoints</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Coronavirus Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Materials Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Pieh, Christoph</au><au>O Rourke, Teresa</au><au>Budimir, Sanja</au><au>Probst, Thomas</au><au>Montazeri, Ali</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Relationship quality and mental health during COVID-19 lockdown</atitle><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><date>2020-09-11</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>15</volume><issue>9</issue><spage>e0238906</spage><pages>e0238906-</pages><issn>1932-6203</issn><eissn>1932-6203</eissn><abstract>Catastrophes are known to have an impact on relationships as well as on mental health. This study evaluated differences in several mental health and well-being measures according to relationship quality during the Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19) pandemic and related lockdown measures. A cross-sectional online survey was launched four weeks after lockdown measures were implemented in Austria. Relationship quality was measured with the Quality of Marriage Index (QMI), and mental health measures included quality of life (WHO-QOL BREF psychological domain), well-being (WHO-5), depression (PHQ-9), anxiety (GAD-7), stress (PSS-10), and sleep quality (ISI). ANOVAs with Bonferroni-corrected post-hoc tests and Chisquared tests were applied. In all mental health scales, individuals with good relationship quality (n = 543) scored better than individuals with poor relationship quality (n = 190) or without relationship (n = 272). The odds ratios (OR) between the poor and good relationship quality groups were 3.5 for the PHQ-9, 3.4 for the GAD-7, and 2.0 for the ISI. Additionally, individuals without no relationship scored better on all scales than individuals with poor relationship quality (all p-values < .05). Relationship quality was related to mental health during COVID-19. The prevalence of depressive symptoms increased according to relationship quality from 13% up to 35%. Relationship per se was not associated with better mental health, but the quality of the relationship was essential. Compared to no relationship, a good relationship quality was a protective factor whereas a poor relationship quality was a risk factor.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Public Library of Science</pub><pmid>32915878</pmid><doi>10.1371/journal.pone.0238906</doi><tpages>e0238906</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2708-303X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4110-9112</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 1932-6203 |
| ispartof | PloS one, 2020-09, Vol.15 (9), p.e0238906 |
| issn | 1932-6203 1932-6203 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_plos_journals_2441872293 |
| source | MEDLINE; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Public Library of Science (PLoS); PubMed Central; Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry |
| subjects | Adolescent Adult Aged Anxiety Anxiety disorders Austria Biology and Life Sciences Care and treatment Coronavirus Infections - epidemiology Coronavirus Infections - prevention & control Coronavirus Infections - psychology Coronaviruses COVID-19 Depression (Mood disorder) Disasters Disease transmission Divorce Family Relations Female Gender Health aspects Humans Insomnia Interpersonal Relations Male Marriage Medicine and Health Sciences Mental depression Mental health Mental Health - statistics & numerical data Middle Aged Pandemics Pandemics - prevention & control Pneumonia, Viral - epidemiology Pneumonia, Viral - prevention & control Pneumonia, Viral - psychology Population Psychological aspects Psychotherapy Quality of life Quarantine Quarantine - psychology Questionnaires Risk analysis Risk factors Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 Shelter in place Signs and symptoms Sleep Social aspects Social distancing Social Isolation Social Sciences Socioeconomic Factors Stay-at-home orders (Public safety) Stress Viral diseases Well being |
| title | Relationship quality and mental health during COVID-19 lockdown |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-22T16%3A10%3A38IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_plos_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Relationship%20quality%20and%20mental%20health%20during%20COVID-19%20lockdown&rft.jtitle=PloS%20one&rft.au=Pieh,%20Christoph&rft.date=2020-09-11&rft.volume=15&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=e0238906&rft.pages=e0238906-&rft.issn=1932-6203&rft.eissn=1932-6203&rft_id=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0238906&rft_dat=%3Cgale_plos_%3EA635163991%3C/gale_plos_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2441872293&rft_id=info:pmid/32915878&rft_galeid=A635163991&rft_doaj_id=oai_doaj_org_article_0a8e5dfacf884e369173ea19b83f324e&rfr_iscdi=true |