Binocular visual function after staged implantation of extended-depth-of-focus intraocular lens targeting emmetropia and -0.5 diopter: A prospective comparison
The prospective comparative case series aimed to evaluate the binocular uncorrected visual acuities (BUCVAs) after staged implantations of extended-depth-of-focus intraocular lenses (EDOF IOLs) targeting emmetropia and -0.5 diopter (D). Diffractive EDOF IOLs with an add power of +1.75 D were implant...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | PloS one 2020-08, Vol.15 (8), p.e0238135-e0238135 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | e0238135 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 8 |
| container_start_page | e0238135 |
| container_title | PloS one |
| container_volume | 15 |
| creator | Ota, Yuka Bissen-Miyajima, Hiroko Nakamura, Kunihiko Hirasawa, Manabu Minami, Keiichiro |
| description | The prospective comparative case series aimed to evaluate the binocular uncorrected visual acuities (BUCVAs) after staged implantations of extended-depth-of-focus intraocular lenses (EDOF IOLs) targeting emmetropia and -0.5 diopter (D). Diffractive EDOF IOLs with an add power of +1.75 D were implanted in the first eyes targeting emmetropia or -0.5 D according to the patients' preferences, then the targets for the second eyes were determined 1 week or longer after the implantation. IOL powers were determined with the SRK/T formula. Consequently, the subjects were divided into 3 groups: those with emmetropia targeted bilaterally (group EE, 22 patients), those with -0.5 D targeted bilaterally (group MM, 21 patients), and those with monovision of emmetropia and -0.5 D (group EM, 21 patients). Manifest refraction spherical equivalent (MRSE), BUCVA from 0.3 to 5 meters, spectacle use, and questionnaire regarding photic symptoms and patient satisfaction were assessed 3 months postoperatively. No significant differences were seen in the mean BUCVAs at any distance (P > 0.23), spectacle use (P = 0.13), or photic symptoms and patient satisfaction (P>0.65). When the EE and MM groups were assigned based on the MRSE, the EE group was better at 5 m (P = 0.005) while the MM group at 0.5 m (P = 0.031). The effect of different targeted refractions was not identified due to insufficient accuracy in the use of the SRK/T power calculation. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1371/journal.pone.0238135 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_plos_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_plos_journals_2437106723</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A633501055</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_7ee95492d487485e84a8d0fa12903038</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A633501055</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c713t-ea615c60b2e4bae346026c032354d1e7b027c41087e754c3e1279b1a83e1d2773</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNk12L1DAUhoso7rr6DwQDguhFx3y16XghjIsfAwsLft2GTHLaydIm3SQd9Nf4V83sVNmRvZBcJJw8eU_y5pyieErwgjBBXl_5KTjVL0bvYIEpawir7hWnZMloWVPM7t9anxSPYrzCuGJNXT8sThhtOKGNOC1-vbPO66lXAe1snFSP2snpZL1Dqk0QUEyqA4PsMPbKJXWz41sEPxI4A6Y0MKZt6duyzTIRWZeCmgV7cBElFTpI1nUIhgFS8KNVSDmDSryokLF-zFneoBUag48j5NQ7QNoPowo2eve4eNCqPsKTeT4rvn14__X8U3lx-XF9vrootSAslaBqUukabyjwjQLGa0xrjRllFTcExAZToTnBjQBRcc2AULHcENXklaFCsLPi2UF37H2Us7dRUp6txrWgLBPrA2G8upJjsIMKP6VXVt4EfOikCsnqHqQAWFZ8SQ1vBG8qaLhqDG4VoUvMMGuy1ts527QZwGjYu9YfiR7vOLuVnd9JwbnAZC_wchYI_nqCmORgo4Y-_xH46XBvjrmo6ow-_we9-3Uz1an8AOtan_Pqvahc1YxVmOCqytTiDioPA4PVuRBbm-NHB14dHchMyqXTqSlGuf7y-f_Zy-_H7Itb7BZUn7bR99O-POMxyA-gzuUVA7R_TSZY7vvojxty30dy7iP2G3gmD00</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2437106723</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Binocular visual function after staged implantation of extended-depth-of-focus intraocular lens targeting emmetropia and -0.5 diopter: A prospective comparison</title><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry</source><source>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</source><creator>Ota, Yuka ; Bissen-Miyajima, Hiroko ; Nakamura, Kunihiko ; Hirasawa, Manabu ; Minami, Keiichiro</creator><creatorcontrib>Ota, Yuka ; Bissen-Miyajima, Hiroko ; Nakamura, Kunihiko ; Hirasawa, Manabu ; Minami, Keiichiro</creatorcontrib><description>The prospective comparative case series aimed to evaluate the binocular uncorrected visual acuities (BUCVAs) after staged implantations of extended-depth-of-focus intraocular lenses (EDOF IOLs) targeting emmetropia and -0.5 diopter (D). Diffractive EDOF IOLs with an add power of +1.75 D were implanted in the first eyes targeting emmetropia or -0.5 D according to the patients' preferences, then the targets for the second eyes were determined 1 week or longer after the implantation. IOL powers were determined with the SRK/T formula. Consequently, the subjects were divided into 3 groups: those with emmetropia targeted bilaterally (group EE, 22 patients), those with -0.5 D targeted bilaterally (group MM, 21 patients), and those with monovision of emmetropia and -0.5 D (group EM, 21 patients). Manifest refraction spherical equivalent (MRSE), BUCVA from 0.3 to 5 meters, spectacle use, and questionnaire regarding photic symptoms and patient satisfaction were assessed 3 months postoperatively. No significant differences were seen in the mean BUCVAs at any distance (P > 0.23), spectacle use (P = 0.13), or photic symptoms and patient satisfaction (P>0.65). When the EE and MM groups were assigned based on the MRSE, the EE group was better at 5 m (P = 0.005) while the MM group at 0.5 m (P = 0.031). The effect of different targeted refractions was not identified due to insufficient accuracy in the use of the SRK/T power calculation.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0238135</identifier><identifier>PMID: 32841287</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>San Francisco: Public Library of Science</publisher><subject>Binocular vision ; Biology and Life Sciences ; Care and treatment ; Cataract extraction ; Cataracts ; Cornea ; Depth of field ; Eye (anatomy) ; Eye surgery ; Health aspects ; Implantation ; Intraocular lenses ; Medicine and Health Sciences ; Patient outcomes ; Patient satisfaction ; Physical Sciences ; Refraction ; Social Sciences ; Supervision ; Vision disorders ; Visual perception</subject><ispartof>PloS one, 2020-08, Vol.15 (8), p.e0238135-e0238135</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2020 Public Library of Science</rights><rights>2020 Ota et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>2020 Ota et al 2020 Ota et al</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c713t-ea615c60b2e4bae346026c032354d1e7b027c41087e754c3e1279b1a83e1d2773</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c713t-ea615c60b2e4bae346026c032354d1e7b027c41087e754c3e1279b1a83e1d2773</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-9799-8342</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7447018/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7447018/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,860,881,2096,2915,23845,27901,27902,53766,53768,79342,79343</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ota, Yuka</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bissen-Miyajima, Hiroko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nakamura, Kunihiko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hirasawa, Manabu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Minami, Keiichiro</creatorcontrib><title>Binocular visual function after staged implantation of extended-depth-of-focus intraocular lens targeting emmetropia and -0.5 diopter: A prospective comparison</title><title>PloS one</title><description>The prospective comparative case series aimed to evaluate the binocular uncorrected visual acuities (BUCVAs) after staged implantations of extended-depth-of-focus intraocular lenses (EDOF IOLs) targeting emmetropia and -0.5 diopter (D). Diffractive EDOF IOLs with an add power of +1.75 D were implanted in the first eyes targeting emmetropia or -0.5 D according to the patients' preferences, then the targets for the second eyes were determined 1 week or longer after the implantation. IOL powers were determined with the SRK/T formula. Consequently, the subjects were divided into 3 groups: those with emmetropia targeted bilaterally (group EE, 22 patients), those with -0.5 D targeted bilaterally (group MM, 21 patients), and those with monovision of emmetropia and -0.5 D (group EM, 21 patients). Manifest refraction spherical equivalent (MRSE), BUCVA from 0.3 to 5 meters, spectacle use, and questionnaire regarding photic symptoms and patient satisfaction were assessed 3 months postoperatively. No significant differences were seen in the mean BUCVAs at any distance (P > 0.23), spectacle use (P = 0.13), or photic symptoms and patient satisfaction (P>0.65). When the EE and MM groups were assigned based on the MRSE, the EE group was better at 5 m (P = 0.005) while the MM group at 0.5 m (P = 0.031). The effect of different targeted refractions was not identified due to insufficient accuracy in the use of the SRK/T power calculation.</description><subject>Binocular vision</subject><subject>Biology and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Care and treatment</subject><subject>Cataract extraction</subject><subject>Cataracts</subject><subject>Cornea</subject><subject>Depth of field</subject><subject>Eye (anatomy)</subject><subject>Eye surgery</subject><subject>Health aspects</subject><subject>Implantation</subject><subject>Intraocular lenses</subject><subject>Medicine and Health Sciences</subject><subject>Patient outcomes</subject><subject>Patient satisfaction</subject><subject>Physical Sciences</subject><subject>Refraction</subject><subject>Social Sciences</subject><subject>Supervision</subject><subject>Vision disorders</subject><subject>Visual perception</subject><issn>1932-6203</issn><issn>1932-6203</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNqNk12L1DAUhoso7rr6DwQDguhFx3y16XghjIsfAwsLft2GTHLaydIm3SQd9Nf4V83sVNmRvZBcJJw8eU_y5pyieErwgjBBXl_5KTjVL0bvYIEpawir7hWnZMloWVPM7t9anxSPYrzCuGJNXT8sThhtOKGNOC1-vbPO66lXAe1snFSP2snpZL1Dqk0QUEyqA4PsMPbKJXWz41sEPxI4A6Y0MKZt6duyzTIRWZeCmgV7cBElFTpI1nUIhgFS8KNVSDmDSryokLF-zFneoBUag48j5NQ7QNoPowo2eve4eNCqPsKTeT4rvn14__X8U3lx-XF9vrootSAslaBqUukabyjwjQLGa0xrjRllFTcExAZToTnBjQBRcc2AULHcENXklaFCsLPi2UF37H2Us7dRUp6txrWgLBPrA2G8upJjsIMKP6VXVt4EfOikCsnqHqQAWFZ8SQ1vBG8qaLhqDG4VoUvMMGuy1ts527QZwGjYu9YfiR7vOLuVnd9JwbnAZC_wchYI_nqCmORgo4Y-_xH46XBvjrmo6ow-_we9-3Uz1an8AOtan_Pqvahc1YxVmOCqytTiDioPA4PVuRBbm-NHB14dHchMyqXTqSlGuf7y-f_Zy-_H7Itb7BZUn7bR99O-POMxyA-gzuUVA7R_TSZY7vvojxty30dy7iP2G3gmD00</recordid><startdate>20200825</startdate><enddate>20200825</enddate><creator>Ota, Yuka</creator><creator>Bissen-Miyajima, Hiroko</creator><creator>Nakamura, Kunihiko</creator><creator>Hirasawa, Manabu</creator><creator>Minami, Keiichiro</creator><general>Public Library of Science</general><general>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>IOV</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9799-8342</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20200825</creationdate><title>Binocular visual function after staged implantation of extended-depth-of-focus intraocular lens targeting emmetropia and -0.5 diopter: A prospective comparison</title><author>Ota, Yuka ; Bissen-Miyajima, Hiroko ; Nakamura, Kunihiko ; Hirasawa, Manabu ; Minami, Keiichiro</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c713t-ea615c60b2e4bae346026c032354d1e7b027c41087e754c3e1279b1a83e1d2773</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Binocular vision</topic><topic>Biology and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Care and treatment</topic><topic>Cataract extraction</topic><topic>Cataracts</topic><topic>Cornea</topic><topic>Depth of field</topic><topic>Eye (anatomy)</topic><topic>Eye surgery</topic><topic>Health aspects</topic><topic>Implantation</topic><topic>Intraocular lenses</topic><topic>Medicine and Health Sciences</topic><topic>Patient outcomes</topic><topic>Patient satisfaction</topic><topic>Physical Sciences</topic><topic>Refraction</topic><topic>Social Sciences</topic><topic>Supervision</topic><topic>Vision disorders</topic><topic>Visual perception</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ota, Yuka</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bissen-Miyajima, Hiroko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nakamura, Kunihiko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hirasawa, Manabu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Minami, Keiichiro</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Opposing Viewpoints</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Materials Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ota, Yuka</au><au>Bissen-Miyajima, Hiroko</au><au>Nakamura, Kunihiko</au><au>Hirasawa, Manabu</au><au>Minami, Keiichiro</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Binocular visual function after staged implantation of extended-depth-of-focus intraocular lens targeting emmetropia and -0.5 diopter: A prospective comparison</atitle><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle><date>2020-08-25</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>15</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>e0238135</spage><epage>e0238135</epage><pages>e0238135-e0238135</pages><issn>1932-6203</issn><eissn>1932-6203</eissn><abstract>The prospective comparative case series aimed to evaluate the binocular uncorrected visual acuities (BUCVAs) after staged implantations of extended-depth-of-focus intraocular lenses (EDOF IOLs) targeting emmetropia and -0.5 diopter (D). Diffractive EDOF IOLs with an add power of +1.75 D were implanted in the first eyes targeting emmetropia or -0.5 D according to the patients' preferences, then the targets for the second eyes were determined 1 week or longer after the implantation. IOL powers were determined with the SRK/T formula. Consequently, the subjects were divided into 3 groups: those with emmetropia targeted bilaterally (group EE, 22 patients), those with -0.5 D targeted bilaterally (group MM, 21 patients), and those with monovision of emmetropia and -0.5 D (group EM, 21 patients). Manifest refraction spherical equivalent (MRSE), BUCVA from 0.3 to 5 meters, spectacle use, and questionnaire regarding photic symptoms and patient satisfaction were assessed 3 months postoperatively. No significant differences were seen in the mean BUCVAs at any distance (P > 0.23), spectacle use (P = 0.13), or photic symptoms and patient satisfaction (P>0.65). When the EE and MM groups were assigned based on the MRSE, the EE group was better at 5 m (P = 0.005) while the MM group at 0.5 m (P = 0.031). The effect of different targeted refractions was not identified due to insufficient accuracy in the use of the SRK/T power calculation.</abstract><cop>San Francisco</cop><pub>Public Library of Science</pub><pmid>32841287</pmid><doi>10.1371/journal.pone.0238135</doi><tpages>e0238135</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9799-8342</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 1932-6203 |
| ispartof | PloS one, 2020-08, Vol.15 (8), p.e0238135-e0238135 |
| issn | 1932-6203 1932-6203 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_plos_journals_2437106723 |
| source | DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; PubMed Central; Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry; Public Library of Science (PLoS) |
| subjects | Binocular vision Biology and Life Sciences Care and treatment Cataract extraction Cataracts Cornea Depth of field Eye (anatomy) Eye surgery Health aspects Implantation Intraocular lenses Medicine and Health Sciences Patient outcomes Patient satisfaction Physical Sciences Refraction Social Sciences Supervision Vision disorders Visual perception |
| title | Binocular visual function after staged implantation of extended-depth-of-focus intraocular lens targeting emmetropia and -0.5 diopter: A prospective comparison |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-08T21%3A17%3A43IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_plos_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Binocular%20visual%20function%20after%20staged%20implantation%20of%20extended-depth-of-focus%20intraocular%20lens%20targeting%20emmetropia%20and%20-0.5%20diopter:%20A%20prospective%20comparison&rft.jtitle=PloS%20one&rft.au=Ota,%20Yuka&rft.date=2020-08-25&rft.volume=15&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=e0238135&rft.epage=e0238135&rft.pages=e0238135-e0238135&rft.issn=1932-6203&rft.eissn=1932-6203&rft_id=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0238135&rft_dat=%3Cgale_plos_%3EA633501055%3C/gale_plos_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2437106723&rft_id=info:pmid/32841287&rft_galeid=A633501055&rft_doaj_id=oai_doaj_org_article_7ee95492d487485e84a8d0fa12903038&rfr_iscdi=true |