Efficacy and safety of bempedoic acid for the treatment of hypercholesterolemia: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Bempedoic acid is a first-in-class lipid-lowering drug recommended by guidelines for the treatment of hypercholesterolemia. Our objective was to estimate its average effect on plasma lipids in humans and its safety profile. We carried out a systematic review and meta-analysis of phase II and III ran...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | PLoS medicine 2020-07, Vol.17 (7), p.e1003121-e1003121 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | e1003121 |
---|---|
container_issue | 7 |
container_start_page | e1003121 |
container_title | PLoS medicine |
container_volume | 17 |
creator | Cicero, Arrigo F. G Fogacci, Federica Hernandez, Adrian V Banach, Maciej Misra, Adya |
description | Bempedoic acid is a first-in-class lipid-lowering drug recommended by guidelines for the treatment of hypercholesterolemia. Our objective was to estimate its average effect on plasma lipids in humans and its safety profile. We carried out a systematic review and meta-analysis of phase II and III randomized controlled trials on bempedoic acid (PROSPERO: CRD42019129687). PubMed (Medline), Scopus, Google Scholar, and Web of Science databases were searched, with no language restriction, from inception to 5 August 2019. We included 10 RCTs (n = 3,788) comprising 26 arms (active arm [n = 2,460]; control arm [n = 1,328]). Effect sizes for changes in lipids and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP) serum concentration were expressed as mean differences (MDs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). For safety analyses, odds ratios (ORs) and 95% CIs were calculated using the Mantel-Haenszel method. Bempedoic acid significantly reduced total cholesterol (MD -14.94%; 95% CI -17.31%, -12.57%; p < 0.001), non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (MD -18.17%; 95% CI -21.14%, -15.19%; p < 0.001), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (MD -22.94%; 95% CI -26.63%, -19.25%; p < 0.001), low-density lipoprotein particle number (MD -20.67%; 95% CI -23.84%, -17.48%; p < 0.001), apolipoprotein B (MD -15.18%; 95% CI -17.41%, -12.95%; p < 0.001), high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (MD -5.83%; 95% CI -6.14%, -5.52%; p < 0.001), high-density lipoprotein particle number (MD -3.21%; 95% CI -6.40%, -0.02%; p = 0.049), and hsCRP (MD -27.03%; 95% CI -31.42%, -22.64%; p < 0.001). Bempedoic acid did not significantly modify triglyceride level (MD -1.51%; 95% CI -3.75%, 0.74%; p = 0.189), very-low-density lipoprotein particle number (MD 3.79%; 95% CI -9.81%, 17.39%; p = 0.585), and apolipoprotein A-1 (MD -1.83%; 95% CI -5.23%, 1.56%; p = 0.290). Treatment with bempedoic acid was positively associated with an increased risk of discontinuation of treatment (OR 1.37; 95% CI 1.06, 1.76; p = 0.015), elevated serum uric acid (OR 3.55; 95% CI 1.03, 12.27; p = 0.045), elevated liver enzymes (OR 4.28; 95% CI 1.34, 13.71; p = 0.014), and elevated creatine kinase (OR 3.79; 95% CI 1.06, 13.51; p = 0.04), though it was strongly associated with a decreased risk of new onset or worsening diabetes (OR 0.59; 95% CI 0.39, 0.90; p = 0.01). The main limitation of this meta-analysis is related to the relatively small number of individuals involved in the studies, which were often short or middle term in length |
doi_str_mv | 10.1371/journal.pmed.1003121 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_plos_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_plos_journals_2434497155</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A632950619</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_fb2f206bd6bc4003b194f0f4a8b8e12d</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A632950619</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c792t-15a17a9af9ed2ae1bc3bb4d7d42326f4e84d955a84374cd42c5ae5c0c45b62a63</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqVk1uL1DAUx4so7rr6DQQLguhDx-bSduqDMCyrDiwueHsNp-nJNEPbjEk62m9vZqfKVuZB6UOak9_551xyougpSReEFeT11gy2h3ax67BekDRlhJJ70TnJeJmQvMjv3_k_ix45t01TWqZl-jA6YzQvGCPFebS_UkpLkGMMfR07UOjH2Ki4wm6HtdEyBqnrWBkb-wZjbxF8h70_MM24Qysb06LzaMPSaXgTr2I3hn0HPjhb3Gv8cavdoYcEQsSj0-5x9EBB6_DJtF5EX99dfbn8kFzfvF9frq4TWZTUJyQDUkAJqsSaApJKsqridVFzGlJQHJe8LrMMlpwVXAarzAAzmUqeVTmFnF1Ez466u9Y4MZXMCcoZ52VBsiwQ6yNRG9iKndUd2FEY0OLWYOxGgA2ptChURRVN86rOK8lDwStScpUqDstqiYTWQevtdNtQha7IUCcL7Ux0ftLrRmzMXhQszzhhQeDlJGDN9yGUVXTaSWxb6NEMh7hpFrpYMBrQ53-hp7ObqA2EBHSvTLhXHkTFKme0zNKclIFKTlAb7DEEaXpUOphn_OIEH746PAF50uHVzCEwHn_6DQzOifXnT__Bfvx39ubbnH1xh20QWt840w5em97NQX4EpTXOWVR_GkhScRi935UWh9ET0-ixX04sH1Q</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2434497155</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Efficacy and safety of bempedoic acid for the treatment of hypercholesterolemia: A systematic review and meta-analysis</title><source>Public Library of Science (PLoS) Journals Open Access</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Cicero, Arrigo F. G ; Fogacci, Federica ; Hernandez, Adrian V ; Banach, Maciej ; Misra, Adya</creator><creatorcontrib>Cicero, Arrigo F. G ; Fogacci, Federica ; Hernandez, Adrian V ; Banach, Maciej ; Misra, Adya ; on behalf of the Lipid and Blood Pressure Meta-Analysis Collaboration (LBPMC) Group and the International Lipid Expert Panel (ILEP)</creatorcontrib><description><![CDATA[Bempedoic acid is a first-in-class lipid-lowering drug recommended by guidelines for the treatment of hypercholesterolemia. Our objective was to estimate its average effect on plasma lipids in humans and its safety profile. We carried out a systematic review and meta-analysis of phase II and III randomized controlled trials on bempedoic acid (PROSPERO: CRD42019129687). PubMed (Medline), Scopus, Google Scholar, and Web of Science databases were searched, with no language restriction, from inception to 5 August 2019. We included 10 RCTs (n = 3,788) comprising 26 arms (active arm [n = 2,460]; control arm [n = 1,328]). Effect sizes for changes in lipids and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP) serum concentration were expressed as mean differences (MDs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). For safety analyses, odds ratios (ORs) and 95% CIs were calculated using the Mantel-Haenszel method. Bempedoic acid significantly reduced total cholesterol (MD -14.94%; 95% CI -17.31%, -12.57%; p < 0.001), non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (MD -18.17%; 95% CI -21.14%, -15.19%; p < 0.001), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (MD -22.94%; 95% CI -26.63%, -19.25%; p < 0.001), low-density lipoprotein particle number (MD -20.67%; 95% CI -23.84%, -17.48%; p < 0.001), apolipoprotein B (MD -15.18%; 95% CI -17.41%, -12.95%; p < 0.001), high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (MD -5.83%; 95% CI -6.14%, -5.52%; p < 0.001), high-density lipoprotein particle number (MD -3.21%; 95% CI -6.40%, -0.02%; p = 0.049), and hsCRP (MD -27.03%; 95% CI -31.42%, -22.64%; p < 0.001). Bempedoic acid did not significantly modify triglyceride level (MD -1.51%; 95% CI -3.75%, 0.74%; p = 0.189), very-low-density lipoprotein particle number (MD 3.79%; 95% CI -9.81%, 17.39%; p = 0.585), and apolipoprotein A-1 (MD -1.83%; 95% CI -5.23%, 1.56%; p = 0.290). Treatment with bempedoic acid was positively associated with an increased risk of discontinuation of treatment (OR 1.37; 95% CI 1.06, 1.76; p = 0.015), elevated serum uric acid (OR 3.55; 95% CI 1.03, 12.27; p = 0.045), elevated liver enzymes (OR 4.28; 95% CI 1.34, 13.71; p = 0.014), and elevated creatine kinase (OR 3.79; 95% CI 1.06, 13.51; p = 0.04), though it was strongly associated with a decreased risk of new onset or worsening diabetes (OR 0.59; 95% CI 0.39, 0.90; p = 0.01). The main limitation of this meta-analysis is related to the relatively small number of individuals involved in the studies, which were often short or middle term in length. Our results show that bempedoic acid has favorable effects on lipid profile and hsCRP levels and an acceptable safety profile. Further well-designed studies are needed to explore its longer-term safety.]]></description><identifier>ISSN: 1549-1676</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1549-1277</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1549-1676</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1003121</identifier><identifier>PMID: 32673317</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>San Francisco: Public Library of Science</publisher><subject>Analysis ; Anticholesteremic agents ; Apolipoprotein A ; Apolipoprotein B ; Apolipoproteins ; Bias ; Biology and Life Sciences ; Blood lipids ; C-reactive protein ; Cholesterol ; Creatine ; Creatine kinase ; Diabetes mellitus ; Drug therapy ; Enzymes ; Hypercholesterolemia ; Hypertension ; Infections ; Lipids ; Lipoproteins ; Liver ; Low density lipoproteins ; Medicine and Health Sciences ; Meta-analysis ; Online databases ; Pain ; Physical Sciences ; Research and Analysis Methods ; Safety ; Science Policy ; Studies ; Systematic review ; Uric acid</subject><ispartof>PLoS medicine, 2020-07, Vol.17 (7), p.e1003121-e1003121</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2020 Public Library of Science</rights><rights>2020 Cicero et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>2020 Cicero et al 2020 Cicero et al</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c792t-15a17a9af9ed2ae1bc3bb4d7d42326f4e84d955a84374cd42c5ae5c0c45b62a63</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c792t-15a17a9af9ed2ae1bc3bb4d7d42326f4e84d955a84374cd42c5ae5c0c45b62a63</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-6690-6874 ; 0000-0002-4367-3884 ; 0000-0001-7853-0042</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7365413/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7365413/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,860,881,2096,2915,23845,27901,27902,53766,53768,79342,79343</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Cicero, Arrigo F. G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fogacci, Federica</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hernandez, Adrian V</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Banach, Maciej</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Misra, Adya</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>on behalf of the Lipid and Blood Pressure Meta-Analysis Collaboration (LBPMC) Group and the International Lipid Expert Panel (ILEP)</creatorcontrib><title>Efficacy and safety of bempedoic acid for the treatment of hypercholesterolemia: A systematic review and meta-analysis</title><title>PLoS medicine</title><description><![CDATA[Bempedoic acid is a first-in-class lipid-lowering drug recommended by guidelines for the treatment of hypercholesterolemia. Our objective was to estimate its average effect on plasma lipids in humans and its safety profile. We carried out a systematic review and meta-analysis of phase II and III randomized controlled trials on bempedoic acid (PROSPERO: CRD42019129687). PubMed (Medline), Scopus, Google Scholar, and Web of Science databases were searched, with no language restriction, from inception to 5 August 2019. We included 10 RCTs (n = 3,788) comprising 26 arms (active arm [n = 2,460]; control arm [n = 1,328]). Effect sizes for changes in lipids and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP) serum concentration were expressed as mean differences (MDs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). For safety analyses, odds ratios (ORs) and 95% CIs were calculated using the Mantel-Haenszel method. Bempedoic acid significantly reduced total cholesterol (MD -14.94%; 95% CI -17.31%, -12.57%; p < 0.001), non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (MD -18.17%; 95% CI -21.14%, -15.19%; p < 0.001), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (MD -22.94%; 95% CI -26.63%, -19.25%; p < 0.001), low-density lipoprotein particle number (MD -20.67%; 95% CI -23.84%, -17.48%; p < 0.001), apolipoprotein B (MD -15.18%; 95% CI -17.41%, -12.95%; p < 0.001), high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (MD -5.83%; 95% CI -6.14%, -5.52%; p < 0.001), high-density lipoprotein particle number (MD -3.21%; 95% CI -6.40%, -0.02%; p = 0.049), and hsCRP (MD -27.03%; 95% CI -31.42%, -22.64%; p < 0.001). Bempedoic acid did not significantly modify triglyceride level (MD -1.51%; 95% CI -3.75%, 0.74%; p = 0.189), very-low-density lipoprotein particle number (MD 3.79%; 95% CI -9.81%, 17.39%; p = 0.585), and apolipoprotein A-1 (MD -1.83%; 95% CI -5.23%, 1.56%; p = 0.290). Treatment with bempedoic acid was positively associated with an increased risk of discontinuation of treatment (OR 1.37; 95% CI 1.06, 1.76; p = 0.015), elevated serum uric acid (OR 3.55; 95% CI 1.03, 12.27; p = 0.045), elevated liver enzymes (OR 4.28; 95% CI 1.34, 13.71; p = 0.014), and elevated creatine kinase (OR 3.79; 95% CI 1.06, 13.51; p = 0.04), though it was strongly associated with a decreased risk of new onset or worsening diabetes (OR 0.59; 95% CI 0.39, 0.90; p = 0.01). The main limitation of this meta-analysis is related to the relatively small number of individuals involved in the studies, which were often short or middle term in length. Our results show that bempedoic acid has favorable effects on lipid profile and hsCRP levels and an acceptable safety profile. Further well-designed studies are needed to explore its longer-term safety.]]></description><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>Anticholesteremic agents</subject><subject>Apolipoprotein A</subject><subject>Apolipoprotein B</subject><subject>Apolipoproteins</subject><subject>Bias</subject><subject>Biology and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Blood lipids</subject><subject>C-reactive protein</subject><subject>Cholesterol</subject><subject>Creatine</subject><subject>Creatine kinase</subject><subject>Diabetes mellitus</subject><subject>Drug therapy</subject><subject>Enzymes</subject><subject>Hypercholesterolemia</subject><subject>Hypertension</subject><subject>Infections</subject><subject>Lipids</subject><subject>Lipoproteins</subject><subject>Liver</subject><subject>Low density lipoproteins</subject><subject>Medicine and Health Sciences</subject><subject>Meta-analysis</subject><subject>Online databases</subject><subject>Pain</subject><subject>Physical Sciences</subject><subject>Research and Analysis Methods</subject><subject>Safety</subject><subject>Science Policy</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Systematic review</subject><subject>Uric acid</subject><issn>1549-1676</issn><issn>1549-1277</issn><issn>1549-1676</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNqVk1uL1DAUx4so7rr6DQQLguhDx-bSduqDMCyrDiwueHsNp-nJNEPbjEk62m9vZqfKVuZB6UOak9_551xyougpSReEFeT11gy2h3ax67BekDRlhJJ70TnJeJmQvMjv3_k_ix45t01TWqZl-jA6YzQvGCPFebS_UkpLkGMMfR07UOjH2Ki4wm6HtdEyBqnrWBkb-wZjbxF8h70_MM24Qysb06LzaMPSaXgTr2I3hn0HPjhb3Gv8cavdoYcEQsSj0-5x9EBB6_DJtF5EX99dfbn8kFzfvF9frq4TWZTUJyQDUkAJqsSaApJKsqridVFzGlJQHJe8LrMMlpwVXAarzAAzmUqeVTmFnF1Ez466u9Y4MZXMCcoZ52VBsiwQ6yNRG9iKndUd2FEY0OLWYOxGgA2ptChURRVN86rOK8lDwStScpUqDstqiYTWQevtdNtQha7IUCcL7Ux0ftLrRmzMXhQszzhhQeDlJGDN9yGUVXTaSWxb6NEMh7hpFrpYMBrQ53-hp7ObqA2EBHSvTLhXHkTFKme0zNKclIFKTlAb7DEEaXpUOphn_OIEH746PAF50uHVzCEwHn_6DQzOifXnT__Bfvx39ubbnH1xh20QWt840w5em97NQX4EpTXOWVR_GkhScRi935UWh9ET0-ixX04sH1Q</recordid><startdate>20200716</startdate><enddate>20200716</enddate><creator>Cicero, Arrigo F. G</creator><creator>Fogacci, Federica</creator><creator>Hernandez, Adrian V</creator><creator>Banach, Maciej</creator><creator>Misra, Adya</creator><general>Public Library of Science</general><general>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>IOV</scope><scope>ISN</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope><scope>CZK</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6690-6874</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4367-3884</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7853-0042</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20200716</creationdate><title>Efficacy and safety of bempedoic acid for the treatment of hypercholesterolemia: A systematic review and meta-analysis</title><author>Cicero, Arrigo F. G ; Fogacci, Federica ; Hernandez, Adrian V ; Banach, Maciej ; Misra, Adya</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c792t-15a17a9af9ed2ae1bc3bb4d7d42326f4e84d955a84374cd42c5ae5c0c45b62a63</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>Anticholesteremic agents</topic><topic>Apolipoprotein A</topic><topic>Apolipoprotein B</topic><topic>Apolipoproteins</topic><topic>Bias</topic><topic>Biology and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Blood lipids</topic><topic>C-reactive protein</topic><topic>Cholesterol</topic><topic>Creatine</topic><topic>Creatine kinase</topic><topic>Diabetes mellitus</topic><topic>Drug therapy</topic><topic>Enzymes</topic><topic>Hypercholesterolemia</topic><topic>Hypertension</topic><topic>Infections</topic><topic>Lipids</topic><topic>Lipoproteins</topic><topic>Liver</topic><topic>Low density lipoproteins</topic><topic>Medicine and Health Sciences</topic><topic>Meta-analysis</topic><topic>Online databases</topic><topic>Pain</topic><topic>Physical Sciences</topic><topic>Research and Analysis Methods</topic><topic>Safety</topic><topic>Science Policy</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Systematic review</topic><topic>Uric acid</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Cicero, Arrigo F. G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fogacci, Federica</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hernandez, Adrian V</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Banach, Maciej</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Misra, Adya</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>on behalf of the Lipid and Blood Pressure Meta-Analysis Collaboration (LBPMC) Group and the International Lipid Expert Panel (ILEP)</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Opposing Viewpoints</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Canada</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><collection>PLoS Medicine</collection><jtitle>PLoS medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Cicero, Arrigo F. G</au><au>Fogacci, Federica</au><au>Hernandez, Adrian V</au><au>Banach, Maciej</au><au>Misra, Adya</au><aucorp>on behalf of the Lipid and Blood Pressure Meta-Analysis Collaboration (LBPMC) Group and the International Lipid Expert Panel (ILEP)</aucorp><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Efficacy and safety of bempedoic acid for the treatment of hypercholesterolemia: A systematic review and meta-analysis</atitle><jtitle>PLoS medicine</jtitle><date>2020-07-16</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>17</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>e1003121</spage><epage>e1003121</epage><pages>e1003121-e1003121</pages><issn>1549-1676</issn><issn>1549-1277</issn><eissn>1549-1676</eissn><abstract><![CDATA[Bempedoic acid is a first-in-class lipid-lowering drug recommended by guidelines for the treatment of hypercholesterolemia. Our objective was to estimate its average effect on plasma lipids in humans and its safety profile. We carried out a systematic review and meta-analysis of phase II and III randomized controlled trials on bempedoic acid (PROSPERO: CRD42019129687). PubMed (Medline), Scopus, Google Scholar, and Web of Science databases were searched, with no language restriction, from inception to 5 August 2019. We included 10 RCTs (n = 3,788) comprising 26 arms (active arm [n = 2,460]; control arm [n = 1,328]). Effect sizes for changes in lipids and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP) serum concentration were expressed as mean differences (MDs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). For safety analyses, odds ratios (ORs) and 95% CIs were calculated using the Mantel-Haenszel method. Bempedoic acid significantly reduced total cholesterol (MD -14.94%; 95% CI -17.31%, -12.57%; p < 0.001), non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (MD -18.17%; 95% CI -21.14%, -15.19%; p < 0.001), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (MD -22.94%; 95% CI -26.63%, -19.25%; p < 0.001), low-density lipoprotein particle number (MD -20.67%; 95% CI -23.84%, -17.48%; p < 0.001), apolipoprotein B (MD -15.18%; 95% CI -17.41%, -12.95%; p < 0.001), high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (MD -5.83%; 95% CI -6.14%, -5.52%; p < 0.001), high-density lipoprotein particle number (MD -3.21%; 95% CI -6.40%, -0.02%; p = 0.049), and hsCRP (MD -27.03%; 95% CI -31.42%, -22.64%; p < 0.001). Bempedoic acid did not significantly modify triglyceride level (MD -1.51%; 95% CI -3.75%, 0.74%; p = 0.189), very-low-density lipoprotein particle number (MD 3.79%; 95% CI -9.81%, 17.39%; p = 0.585), and apolipoprotein A-1 (MD -1.83%; 95% CI -5.23%, 1.56%; p = 0.290). Treatment with bempedoic acid was positively associated with an increased risk of discontinuation of treatment (OR 1.37; 95% CI 1.06, 1.76; p = 0.015), elevated serum uric acid (OR 3.55; 95% CI 1.03, 12.27; p = 0.045), elevated liver enzymes (OR 4.28; 95% CI 1.34, 13.71; p = 0.014), and elevated creatine kinase (OR 3.79; 95% CI 1.06, 13.51; p = 0.04), though it was strongly associated with a decreased risk of new onset or worsening diabetes (OR 0.59; 95% CI 0.39, 0.90; p = 0.01). The main limitation of this meta-analysis is related to the relatively small number of individuals involved in the studies, which were often short or middle term in length. Our results show that bempedoic acid has favorable effects on lipid profile and hsCRP levels and an acceptable safety profile. Further well-designed studies are needed to explore its longer-term safety.]]></abstract><cop>San Francisco</cop><pub>Public Library of Science</pub><pmid>32673317</pmid><doi>10.1371/journal.pmed.1003121</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6690-6874</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4367-3884</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7853-0042</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1549-1676 |
ispartof | PLoS medicine, 2020-07, Vol.17 (7), p.e1003121-e1003121 |
issn | 1549-1676 1549-1277 1549-1676 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_plos_journals_2434497155 |
source | Public Library of Science (PLoS) Journals Open Access; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central |
subjects | Analysis Anticholesteremic agents Apolipoprotein A Apolipoprotein B Apolipoproteins Bias Biology and Life Sciences Blood lipids C-reactive protein Cholesterol Creatine Creatine kinase Diabetes mellitus Drug therapy Enzymes Hypercholesterolemia Hypertension Infections Lipids Lipoproteins Liver Low density lipoproteins Medicine and Health Sciences Meta-analysis Online databases Pain Physical Sciences Research and Analysis Methods Safety Science Policy Studies Systematic review Uric acid |
title | Efficacy and safety of bempedoic acid for the treatment of hypercholesterolemia: A systematic review and meta-analysis |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-08T03%3A52%3A13IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_plos_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Efficacy%20and%20safety%20of%20bempedoic%20acid%20for%20the%20treatment%20of%20hypercholesterolemia:%20A%20systematic%20review%20and%20meta-analysis&rft.jtitle=PLoS%20medicine&rft.au=Cicero,%20Arrigo%20F.%20G&rft.aucorp=on%20behalf%20of%20the%20Lipid%20and%20Blood%20Pressure%20Meta-Analysis%20Collaboration%20(LBPMC)%20Group%20and%20the%20International%20Lipid%20Expert%20Panel%20(ILEP)&rft.date=2020-07-16&rft.volume=17&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=e1003121&rft.epage=e1003121&rft.pages=e1003121-e1003121&rft.issn=1549-1676&rft.eissn=1549-1676&rft_id=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pmed.1003121&rft_dat=%3Cgale_plos_%3EA632950619%3C/gale_plos_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2434497155&rft_id=info:pmid/32673317&rft_galeid=A632950619&rft_doaj_id=oai_doaj_org_article_fb2f206bd6bc4003b194f0f4a8b8e12d&rfr_iscdi=true |