Four weeks versus six weeks of ampicillin plus ceftriaxone in Enterococcus faecalis native valve endocarditis: A prospective cohort study
Enterococcus faecalis infective endocarditis (EFIE) is a severe disease of increasing incidence. The objective was to analyze whether the outcome of patients with native valve EFIE (NVEFIE) treated with a short course of ampicillin plus ceftriaxone (4wAC) was similar to patients treated according to...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | PloS one 2020-08, Vol.15 (8), p.e0237011-e0237011 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | e0237011 |
---|---|
container_issue | 8 |
container_start_page | e0237011 |
container_title | PloS one |
container_volume | 15 |
creator | Ramos-Martínez, Antonio Pericàs, Juan Manuel Fernández-Cruz, Ana Muñoz, Patricia Valerio, Maricela Kestler, Martha Montejo, Miguel Fariñas, M. Carmen Sousa, Dolores Domínguez, Fernando Ojeda-Burgos, Guillermo Plata, Antonio Vidal, Laura Miró, José María Oury, Cécile |
description | Enterococcus faecalis infective endocarditis (EFIE) is a severe disease of increasing incidence. The objective was to analyze whether the outcome of patients with native valve EFIE (NVEFIE) treated with a short course of ampicillin plus ceftriaxone (4wAC) was similar to patients treated according to international guidelines (6wAC). Between January 2008 and June 2018, 1,978 consecutive patients with definite native valve IE were prospectively included in a national registry. Outcomes of patients with NVEFIE treated with 4wAC were compared to those of patients who received 6wAC. Three hundred and twenty-two patients (16.3%) had NVEFIE. One hundred and eighty-three (56.8%) received AC. Thirty-nine patients (21.3%) were treated with 4wAC for four weeks and 70 patients (38.3%) with 6wAC. There were no differences in age or comorbidity. Patients treated 6wAC presented a longer duration of symptoms before diagnosis (21 days, IQR 7-60 days vs. 7 days, IQR 1-22 days; p = 0.002). Six patients presented perivalvular abscess and all of these received 6wAC. Surgery was performed on 14 patients (35.9%) 4wAC and 34 patients (48.6%) 6wAC (p = 0.201). In-hospital mortality, one-year mortality and relapses among 4wAC and 6wAC patients were 10.3% vs. 11.4% (p = 0.851); 17.9% vs. 21.4% (p = 0.682) and 5.1% vs. 4.3% (p = 0.833), respectively. In conclusion, a four-week course of AC may be considered as an alternative regimen in NVEFIE, notably in patients with shorter duration of symptoms and those without perivalvular abscess. These results support the performance of a randomized clinical trial to evaluate the efficacy of this short regimen. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1371/journal.pone.0237011 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_plos_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_plos_journals_2430091168</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A631424990</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_57e28561496b4c89917a33879412a810</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A631424990</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c669t-869fd9059b6c945f818ffdb832dbc6b7678b3c086e3f3593e0e7a31048dffe9e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNk99rFDEQxxdRbK3-B4ILgujDnckmm018EEpp9aBQ8NdryGYndzlzmzXJnu2f4H9trrdKT_oggSTMfOY7ySRTFM8xmmPS4LdrP4Zeufnge5ijijQI4wfFMRakmrEKkYd39kfFkxjXCNWEM_a4OCJVQ2sk8HHx6yLLlD8BvsdyCyGOsYz2ejJ4U6rNYLV1zvbl4LJTg0nBquuctMy28z5B8NprnX1GgVbOxrJXyW6h3CqXZ-g7r1XobLLxXXlaDsHHAfQtof3Kh1TGNHY3T4tHRrkIz6b1pPh6cf7l7OPs8urD4uz0cqYZE2nGmTCdQLVomRa0NhxzY7qWk6prNWsb1vCWaMQZEENqQQBBowhGlHfGgAByUrzY6w7ORzlVMcqKEpQrghnPxGJPdF6t5RDsRoUb6ZWVtwYfllKFZLUDWTdQ8ZphKlhLNRcC52SEN4LiSnGMstb7KdvYbqDT0Keg3IHooae3K7n0W9kQwfMTZYHXk0DwP0aISW5s1OCc6sGP-3OThlJKMvryH_T-203UUuUL2N74nFfvROUpI5hWVIjduef3UHl0sLE6v76x2X4Q8OYgIDMJrtNSjTHKxedP_89efTtkX91hV6BcWkXvxmR9Hw9Bugd1_mAxgPlbZIzkrmP-VEPuOkZOHUN-A6Y3CFo</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2430091168</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Four weeks versus six weeks of ampicillin plus ceftriaxone in Enterococcus faecalis native valve endocarditis: A prospective cohort study</title><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Public Library of Science (PLoS) Journals Open Access</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry</source><creator>Ramos-Martínez, Antonio ; Pericàs, Juan Manuel ; Fernández-Cruz, Ana ; Muñoz, Patricia ; Valerio, Maricela ; Kestler, Martha ; Montejo, Miguel ; Fariñas, M. Carmen ; Sousa, Dolores ; Domínguez, Fernando ; Ojeda-Burgos, Guillermo ; Plata, Antonio ; Vidal, Laura ; Miró, José María ; Oury, Cécile</creator><contributor>Oury, Cécile</contributor><creatorcontrib>Ramos-Martínez, Antonio ; Pericàs, Juan Manuel ; Fernández-Cruz, Ana ; Muñoz, Patricia ; Valerio, Maricela ; Kestler, Martha ; Montejo, Miguel ; Fariñas, M. Carmen ; Sousa, Dolores ; Domínguez, Fernando ; Ojeda-Burgos, Guillermo ; Plata, Antonio ; Vidal, Laura ; Miró, José María ; Oury, Cécile ; On behalf of the Grupo de Apoyo al Manejo de la Endocarditis Infecciosa en España (GAMES) ; Oury, Cécile</creatorcontrib><description>Enterococcus faecalis infective endocarditis (EFIE) is a severe disease of increasing incidence. The objective was to analyze whether the outcome of patients with native valve EFIE (NVEFIE) treated with a short course of ampicillin plus ceftriaxone (4wAC) was similar to patients treated according to international guidelines (6wAC). Between January 2008 and June 2018, 1,978 consecutive patients with definite native valve IE were prospectively included in a national registry. Outcomes of patients with NVEFIE treated with 4wAC were compared to those of patients who received 6wAC. Three hundred and twenty-two patients (16.3%) had NVEFIE. One hundred and eighty-three (56.8%) received AC. Thirty-nine patients (21.3%) were treated with 4wAC for four weeks and 70 patients (38.3%) with 6wAC. There were no differences in age or comorbidity. Patients treated 6wAC presented a longer duration of symptoms before diagnosis (21 days, IQR 7-60 days vs. 7 days, IQR 1-22 days; p = 0.002). Six patients presented perivalvular abscess and all of these received 6wAC. Surgery was performed on 14 patients (35.9%) 4wAC and 34 patients (48.6%) 6wAC (p = 0.201). In-hospital mortality, one-year mortality and relapses among 4wAC and 6wAC patients were 10.3% vs. 11.4% (p = 0.851); 17.9% vs. 21.4% (p = 0.682) and 5.1% vs. 4.3% (p = 0.833), respectively. In conclusion, a four-week course of AC may be considered as an alternative regimen in NVEFIE, notably in patients with shorter duration of symptoms and those without perivalvular abscess. These results support the performance of a randomized clinical trial to evaluate the efficacy of this short regimen.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0237011</identifier><identifier>PMID: 32745091</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>San Francisco: Public Library of Science</publisher><subject>Ampicillin ; Antibiotics ; Bacterial endocarditis ; Biology and Life Sciences ; Ceftriaxone ; Cohort analysis ; Creatinine ; Drug therapy ; Endocarditis ; Enterococcal infections ; Enterococcus faecalis ; Hospitals ; Medical prognosis ; Medicine and Health Sciences ; Mortality ; Patients ; Penicillin ; Signs and symptoms ; Software ; Supervision ; Surgery ; Survival analysis ; Testing</subject><ispartof>PloS one, 2020-08, Vol.15 (8), p.e0237011-e0237011</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2020 Public Library of Science</rights><rights>2020 Ramos-Martínez et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>2020 Ramos-Martínez et al 2020 Ramos-Martínez et al</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c669t-869fd9059b6c945f818ffdb832dbc6b7678b3c086e3f3593e0e7a31048dffe9e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c669t-869fd9059b6c945f818ffdb832dbc6b7678b3c086e3f3593e0e7a31048dffe9e3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-1189-1120 ; 0000-0002-4840-9425 ; 0000-0003-2594-5169</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7398509/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7398509/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,864,885,2102,2928,23866,27924,27925,53791,53793</link.rule.ids></links><search><contributor>Oury, Cécile</contributor><creatorcontrib>Ramos-Martínez, Antonio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pericàs, Juan Manuel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fernández-Cruz, Ana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Muñoz, Patricia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Valerio, Maricela</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kestler, Martha</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Montejo, Miguel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fariñas, M. Carmen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sousa, Dolores</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Domínguez, Fernando</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ojeda-Burgos, Guillermo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Plata, Antonio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vidal, Laura</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Miró, José María</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oury, Cécile</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>On behalf of the Grupo de Apoyo al Manejo de la Endocarditis Infecciosa en España (GAMES)</creatorcontrib><title>Four weeks versus six weeks of ampicillin plus ceftriaxone in Enterococcus faecalis native valve endocarditis: A prospective cohort study</title><title>PloS one</title><description>Enterococcus faecalis infective endocarditis (EFIE) is a severe disease of increasing incidence. The objective was to analyze whether the outcome of patients with native valve EFIE (NVEFIE) treated with a short course of ampicillin plus ceftriaxone (4wAC) was similar to patients treated according to international guidelines (6wAC). Between January 2008 and June 2018, 1,978 consecutive patients with definite native valve IE were prospectively included in a national registry. Outcomes of patients with NVEFIE treated with 4wAC were compared to those of patients who received 6wAC. Three hundred and twenty-two patients (16.3%) had NVEFIE. One hundred and eighty-three (56.8%) received AC. Thirty-nine patients (21.3%) were treated with 4wAC for four weeks and 70 patients (38.3%) with 6wAC. There were no differences in age or comorbidity. Patients treated 6wAC presented a longer duration of symptoms before diagnosis (21 days, IQR 7-60 days vs. 7 days, IQR 1-22 days; p = 0.002). Six patients presented perivalvular abscess and all of these received 6wAC. Surgery was performed on 14 patients (35.9%) 4wAC and 34 patients (48.6%) 6wAC (p = 0.201). In-hospital mortality, one-year mortality and relapses among 4wAC and 6wAC patients were 10.3% vs. 11.4% (p = 0.851); 17.9% vs. 21.4% (p = 0.682) and 5.1% vs. 4.3% (p = 0.833), respectively. In conclusion, a four-week course of AC may be considered as an alternative regimen in NVEFIE, notably in patients with shorter duration of symptoms and those without perivalvular abscess. These results support the performance of a randomized clinical trial to evaluate the efficacy of this short regimen.</description><subject>Ampicillin</subject><subject>Antibiotics</subject><subject>Bacterial endocarditis</subject><subject>Biology and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Ceftriaxone</subject><subject>Cohort analysis</subject><subject>Creatinine</subject><subject>Drug therapy</subject><subject>Endocarditis</subject><subject>Enterococcal infections</subject><subject>Enterococcus faecalis</subject><subject>Hospitals</subject><subject>Medical prognosis</subject><subject>Medicine and Health Sciences</subject><subject>Mortality</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Penicillin</subject><subject>Signs and symptoms</subject><subject>Software</subject><subject>Supervision</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>Survival analysis</subject><subject>Testing</subject><issn>1932-6203</issn><issn>1932-6203</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNqNk99rFDEQxxdRbK3-B4ILgujDnckmm018EEpp9aBQ8NdryGYndzlzmzXJnu2f4H9trrdKT_oggSTMfOY7ySRTFM8xmmPS4LdrP4Zeufnge5ijijQI4wfFMRakmrEKkYd39kfFkxjXCNWEM_a4OCJVQ2sk8HHx6yLLlD8BvsdyCyGOsYz2ejJ4U6rNYLV1zvbl4LJTg0nBquuctMy28z5B8NprnX1GgVbOxrJXyW6h3CqXZ-g7r1XobLLxXXlaDsHHAfQtof3Kh1TGNHY3T4tHRrkIz6b1pPh6cf7l7OPs8urD4uz0cqYZE2nGmTCdQLVomRa0NhxzY7qWk6prNWsb1vCWaMQZEENqQQBBowhGlHfGgAByUrzY6w7ORzlVMcqKEpQrghnPxGJPdF6t5RDsRoUb6ZWVtwYfllKFZLUDWTdQ8ZphKlhLNRcC52SEN4LiSnGMstb7KdvYbqDT0Keg3IHooae3K7n0W9kQwfMTZYHXk0DwP0aISW5s1OCc6sGP-3OThlJKMvryH_T-203UUuUL2N74nFfvROUpI5hWVIjduef3UHl0sLE6v76x2X4Q8OYgIDMJrtNSjTHKxedP_89efTtkX91hV6BcWkXvxmR9Hw9Bugd1_mAxgPlbZIzkrmP-VEPuOkZOHUN-A6Y3CFo</recordid><startdate>20200803</startdate><enddate>20200803</enddate><creator>Ramos-Martínez, Antonio</creator><creator>Pericàs, Juan Manuel</creator><creator>Fernández-Cruz, Ana</creator><creator>Muñoz, Patricia</creator><creator>Valerio, Maricela</creator><creator>Kestler, Martha</creator><creator>Montejo, Miguel</creator><creator>Fariñas, M. Carmen</creator><creator>Sousa, Dolores</creator><creator>Domínguez, Fernando</creator><creator>Ojeda-Burgos, Guillermo</creator><creator>Plata, Antonio</creator><creator>Vidal, Laura</creator><creator>Miró, José María</creator><creator>Oury, Cécile</creator><general>Public Library of Science</general><general>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>IOV</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1189-1120</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4840-9425</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2594-5169</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20200803</creationdate><title>Four weeks versus six weeks of ampicillin plus ceftriaxone in Enterococcus faecalis native valve endocarditis: A prospective cohort study</title><author>Ramos-Martínez, Antonio ; Pericàs, Juan Manuel ; Fernández-Cruz, Ana ; Muñoz, Patricia ; Valerio, Maricela ; Kestler, Martha ; Montejo, Miguel ; Fariñas, M. Carmen ; Sousa, Dolores ; Domínguez, Fernando ; Ojeda-Burgos, Guillermo ; Plata, Antonio ; Vidal, Laura ; Miró, José María ; Oury, Cécile</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c669t-869fd9059b6c945f818ffdb832dbc6b7678b3c086e3f3593e0e7a31048dffe9e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Ampicillin</topic><topic>Antibiotics</topic><topic>Bacterial endocarditis</topic><topic>Biology and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Ceftriaxone</topic><topic>Cohort analysis</topic><topic>Creatinine</topic><topic>Drug therapy</topic><topic>Endocarditis</topic><topic>Enterococcal infections</topic><topic>Enterococcus faecalis</topic><topic>Hospitals</topic><topic>Medical prognosis</topic><topic>Medicine and Health Sciences</topic><topic>Mortality</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Penicillin</topic><topic>Signs and symptoms</topic><topic>Software</topic><topic>Supervision</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>Survival analysis</topic><topic>Testing</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ramos-Martínez, Antonio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pericàs, Juan Manuel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fernández-Cruz, Ana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Muñoz, Patricia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Valerio, Maricela</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kestler, Martha</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Montejo, Miguel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fariñas, M. Carmen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sousa, Dolores</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Domínguez, Fernando</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ojeda-Burgos, Guillermo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Plata, Antonio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vidal, Laura</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Miró, José María</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oury, Cécile</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>On behalf of the Grupo de Apoyo al Manejo de la Endocarditis Infecciosa en España (GAMES)</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Opposing Viewpoints</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Materials Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>Access via ProQuest (Open Access)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ramos-Martínez, Antonio</au><au>Pericàs, Juan Manuel</au><au>Fernández-Cruz, Ana</au><au>Muñoz, Patricia</au><au>Valerio, Maricela</au><au>Kestler, Martha</au><au>Montejo, Miguel</au><au>Fariñas, M. Carmen</au><au>Sousa, Dolores</au><au>Domínguez, Fernando</au><au>Ojeda-Burgos, Guillermo</au><au>Plata, Antonio</au><au>Vidal, Laura</au><au>Miró, José María</au><au>Oury, Cécile</au><au>Oury, Cécile</au><aucorp>On behalf of the Grupo de Apoyo al Manejo de la Endocarditis Infecciosa en España (GAMES)</aucorp><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Four weeks versus six weeks of ampicillin plus ceftriaxone in Enterococcus faecalis native valve endocarditis: A prospective cohort study</atitle><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle><date>2020-08-03</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>15</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>e0237011</spage><epage>e0237011</epage><pages>e0237011-e0237011</pages><issn>1932-6203</issn><eissn>1932-6203</eissn><abstract>Enterococcus faecalis infective endocarditis (EFIE) is a severe disease of increasing incidence. The objective was to analyze whether the outcome of patients with native valve EFIE (NVEFIE) treated with a short course of ampicillin plus ceftriaxone (4wAC) was similar to patients treated according to international guidelines (6wAC). Between January 2008 and June 2018, 1,978 consecutive patients with definite native valve IE were prospectively included in a national registry. Outcomes of patients with NVEFIE treated with 4wAC were compared to those of patients who received 6wAC. Three hundred and twenty-two patients (16.3%) had NVEFIE. One hundred and eighty-three (56.8%) received AC. Thirty-nine patients (21.3%) were treated with 4wAC for four weeks and 70 patients (38.3%) with 6wAC. There were no differences in age or comorbidity. Patients treated 6wAC presented a longer duration of symptoms before diagnosis (21 days, IQR 7-60 days vs. 7 days, IQR 1-22 days; p = 0.002). Six patients presented perivalvular abscess and all of these received 6wAC. Surgery was performed on 14 patients (35.9%) 4wAC and 34 patients (48.6%) 6wAC (p = 0.201). In-hospital mortality, one-year mortality and relapses among 4wAC and 6wAC patients were 10.3% vs. 11.4% (p = 0.851); 17.9% vs. 21.4% (p = 0.682) and 5.1% vs. 4.3% (p = 0.833), respectively. In conclusion, a four-week course of AC may be considered as an alternative regimen in NVEFIE, notably in patients with shorter duration of symptoms and those without perivalvular abscess. These results support the performance of a randomized clinical trial to evaluate the efficacy of this short regimen.</abstract><cop>San Francisco</cop><pub>Public Library of Science</pub><pmid>32745091</pmid><doi>10.1371/journal.pone.0237011</doi><tpages>e0237011</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1189-1120</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4840-9425</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2594-5169</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1932-6203 |
ispartof | PloS one, 2020-08, Vol.15 (8), p.e0237011-e0237011 |
issn | 1932-6203 1932-6203 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_plos_journals_2430091168 |
source | DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Public Library of Science (PLoS) Journals Open Access; PubMed Central; Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry |
subjects | Ampicillin Antibiotics Bacterial endocarditis Biology and Life Sciences Ceftriaxone Cohort analysis Creatinine Drug therapy Endocarditis Enterococcal infections Enterococcus faecalis Hospitals Medical prognosis Medicine and Health Sciences Mortality Patients Penicillin Signs and symptoms Software Supervision Surgery Survival analysis Testing |
title | Four weeks versus six weeks of ampicillin plus ceftriaxone in Enterococcus faecalis native valve endocarditis: A prospective cohort study |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-21T04%3A31%3A31IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_plos_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Four%20weeks%20versus%20six%20weeks%20of%20ampicillin%20plus%20ceftriaxone%20in%20Enterococcus%20faecalis%20native%20valve%20endocarditis:%20A%20prospective%20cohort%20study&rft.jtitle=PloS%20one&rft.au=Ramos-Mart%C3%ADnez,%20Antonio&rft.aucorp=On%20behalf%20of%20the%20Grupo%20de%20Apoyo%20al%20Manejo%20de%20la%20Endocarditis%20Infecciosa%20en%20Espa%C3%B1a%20(GAMES)&rft.date=2020-08-03&rft.volume=15&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=e0237011&rft.epage=e0237011&rft.pages=e0237011-e0237011&rft.issn=1932-6203&rft.eissn=1932-6203&rft_id=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0237011&rft_dat=%3Cgale_plos_%3EA631424990%3C/gale_plos_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2430091168&rft_id=info:pmid/32745091&rft_galeid=A631424990&rft_doaj_id=oai_doaj_org_article_57e28561496b4c89917a33879412a810&rfr_iscdi=true |