Measurement in the study of menstrual health and hygiene: A systematic review and audit
The lack of established measurement tools in the study of menstrual health and hygiene has been a significant limitation of quantitative studies to date. However, there has been limited exploration of existing measurement to identify avenues for improvement. We undertook two linked systematic review...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | PloS one 2020-06, Vol.15 (6), p.e0232935 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 6 |
| container_start_page | e0232935 |
| container_title | PloS one |
| container_volume | 15 |
| creator | Hennegan, Julie Brooks, Deborah Jordan Schwab, Kellogg J Melendez-Torres, G.J Pant Pai, Nitika |
| description | The lack of established measurement tools in the study of menstrual health and hygiene has been a significant limitation of quantitative studies to date. However, there has been limited exploration of existing measurement to identify avenues for improvement. We undertook two linked systematic reviews of (1) trials of menstrual health interventions and their nested studies in low- and middle-income countries, (2) studies developing or validating measures of menstrual experiences from any location. Systematic searching was undertaken in 12 databases, together with handsearching. We iteratively grouped and audited concepts measured across included studies and extracted and compared measures of each concept. A total of 23 trials, 9 nested studies and 22 measure development studies were included. Trials measured a range of outcomes including menstrual knowledge, attitudes, and practices, school absenteeism, and health. Most measure validation studies focused on assessing attitudes towards menstruation, while a group of five studies assessed the accuracy of women's recall of their menstrual characteristics such as timing and cycle length. Measures of menstrual knowledge, attitudes, beliefs and restrictions were inconsistent and frequently overlapped. No two studies measured the same menstrual or hygiene practices, with 44 different practices assessed. This audit provides a summary of current measures and extant efforts to pilot or test their performance. Inconsistencies in both the definition and operationalisation of concepts measured in menstrual health and hygiene research should be addressed. To improve measurement, authors should clearly define the constructs they aim to measure and outline how these were operationalised for measurement. Results of this audit indicate the need for the development and validation of new measures, and the evaluation of the performance of existing measures across contexts. In particular, the definition and measurement of menstrual practices, knowledge, attitudes, norms and restrictions should be addressed. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1371/journal.pone.0232935 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_plos_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_plos_journals_2409620111</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A625751171</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_2efcca28fe744a6fb1cf165495cc15f7</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A625751171</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c669t-f26b88ca50a99b34ba1d0778d59405c4531a2a05cc83d53babb5c7c6113a3f873</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkl2L1DAUhoso7jr6DwQDguDFjPlomtYLYVj8GFhZ8PMynKZJJ0PbzCbp6vx7MztVtqAgucjh5DnvSU7eLHtK8IowQV7t3OgH6FZ7N-gVpoxWjN_LzknF6LKgmN2_E59lj0LYYcxZWRQPszNG80oQIs6z7x81hNHrXg8R2QHFrUYhjs0BOYNSMkQ_Qoe2Grq4RTA0aHtorR70a7RG4RCi7iFahby-sfrHLQBjY-Pj7IGBLugn077Ivr57--Xiw_Ly6v3mYn25VEVRxaWhRV2WCjiGqqpZXgNpsBBlw6scc5VzRoBCilTJGs5qqGuuhCoIYcBMKdgie3bS3XcuyGkmQdIcV-nhJHGLbHMiGgc7ufe2B3-QDqy8TTjfSvDpCZ2WVBulgJZGizyHwtREGVLwvEr9CTfHbm-mbmPd60aloXnoZqLzk8FuZetupKCCYlwmgeeTgHfXow7xH1eeqBbSrexgXBJTvQ1KrgvKBU9fd6RWf6HSanRvVXKFsSk_K3g5K0hM1D9jC2MIcvP50_-zV9_m7Is77MkqwXVjtG4IczA_gcq7ELw2fyZHsDya-vc05NHUcjI1-wW2sugJ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2409620111</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Measurement in the study of menstrual health and hygiene: A systematic review and audit</title><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry</source><creator>Hennegan, Julie ; Brooks, Deborah Jordan ; Schwab, Kellogg J ; Melendez-Torres, G.J ; Pant Pai, Nitika</creator><contributor>Pant Pai, Nitika</contributor><creatorcontrib>Hennegan, Julie ; Brooks, Deborah Jordan ; Schwab, Kellogg J ; Melendez-Torres, G.J ; Pant Pai, Nitika ; Pant Pai, Nitika</creatorcontrib><description>The lack of established measurement tools in the study of menstrual health and hygiene has been a significant limitation of quantitative studies to date. However, there has been limited exploration of existing measurement to identify avenues for improvement. We undertook two linked systematic reviews of (1) trials of menstrual health interventions and their nested studies in low- and middle-income countries, (2) studies developing or validating measures of menstrual experiences from any location. Systematic searching was undertaken in 12 databases, together with handsearching. We iteratively grouped and audited concepts measured across included studies and extracted and compared measures of each concept. A total of 23 trials, 9 nested studies and 22 measure development studies were included. Trials measured a range of outcomes including menstrual knowledge, attitudes, and practices, school absenteeism, and health. Most measure validation studies focused on assessing attitudes towards menstruation, while a group of five studies assessed the accuracy of women's recall of their menstrual characteristics such as timing and cycle length. Measures of menstrual knowledge, attitudes, beliefs and restrictions were inconsistent and frequently overlapped. No two studies measured the same menstrual or hygiene practices, with 44 different practices assessed. This audit provides a summary of current measures and extant efforts to pilot or test their performance. Inconsistencies in both the definition and operationalisation of concepts measured in menstrual health and hygiene research should be addressed. To improve measurement, authors should clearly define the constructs they aim to measure and outline how these were operationalised for measurement. Results of this audit indicate the need for the development and validation of new measures, and the evaluation of the performance of existing measures across contexts. In particular, the definition and measurement of menstrual practices, knowledge, attitudes, norms and restrictions should be addressed.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0232935</identifier><identifier>PMID: 32497117</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>San Francisco: Public Library of Science</publisher><subject>Absenteeism ; Absenteeism (Labor) ; Attitudes ; Biology and Life Sciences ; Environmental health ; Girls ; Health promotion ; Hygiene ; Literature reviews ; Low income groups ; Medical research ; Medicine and Health Sciences ; Menstrual products ; Menstruation ; Norms ; People and Places ; Performance evaluation ; Public health ; Quantitative research ; Research and Analysis Methods ; Sanitation ; Social Sciences ; Studies ; Systematic review ; Teenagers ; Womens health</subject><ispartof>PloS one, 2020-06, Vol.15 (6), p.e0232935</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2020 Public Library of Science</rights><rights>2020 Hennegan et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>2020 Hennegan et al 2020 Hennegan et al</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c669t-f26b88ca50a99b34ba1d0778d59405c4531a2a05cc83d53babb5c7c6113a3f873</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c669t-f26b88ca50a99b34ba1d0778d59405c4531a2a05cc83d53babb5c7c6113a3f873</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-2011-1595</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7272008/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7272008/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,864,885,2100,2926,23864,27922,27923,53789,53791,79370,79371</link.rule.ids></links><search><contributor>Pant Pai, Nitika</contributor><creatorcontrib>Hennegan, Julie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brooks, Deborah Jordan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schwab, Kellogg J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Melendez-Torres, G.J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pant Pai, Nitika</creatorcontrib><title>Measurement in the study of menstrual health and hygiene: A systematic review and audit</title><title>PloS one</title><description>The lack of established measurement tools in the study of menstrual health and hygiene has been a significant limitation of quantitative studies to date. However, there has been limited exploration of existing measurement to identify avenues for improvement. We undertook two linked systematic reviews of (1) trials of menstrual health interventions and their nested studies in low- and middle-income countries, (2) studies developing or validating measures of menstrual experiences from any location. Systematic searching was undertaken in 12 databases, together with handsearching. We iteratively grouped and audited concepts measured across included studies and extracted and compared measures of each concept. A total of 23 trials, 9 nested studies and 22 measure development studies were included. Trials measured a range of outcomes including menstrual knowledge, attitudes, and practices, school absenteeism, and health. Most measure validation studies focused on assessing attitudes towards menstruation, while a group of five studies assessed the accuracy of women's recall of their menstrual characteristics such as timing and cycle length. Measures of menstrual knowledge, attitudes, beliefs and restrictions were inconsistent and frequently overlapped. No two studies measured the same menstrual or hygiene practices, with 44 different practices assessed. This audit provides a summary of current measures and extant efforts to pilot or test their performance. Inconsistencies in both the definition and operationalisation of concepts measured in menstrual health and hygiene research should be addressed. To improve measurement, authors should clearly define the constructs they aim to measure and outline how these were operationalised for measurement. Results of this audit indicate the need for the development and validation of new measures, and the evaluation of the performance of existing measures across contexts. In particular, the definition and measurement of menstrual practices, knowledge, attitudes, norms and restrictions should be addressed.</description><subject>Absenteeism</subject><subject>Absenteeism (Labor)</subject><subject>Attitudes</subject><subject>Biology and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Environmental health</subject><subject>Girls</subject><subject>Health promotion</subject><subject>Hygiene</subject><subject>Literature reviews</subject><subject>Low income groups</subject><subject>Medical research</subject><subject>Medicine and Health Sciences</subject><subject>Menstrual products</subject><subject>Menstruation</subject><subject>Norms</subject><subject>People and Places</subject><subject>Performance evaluation</subject><subject>Public health</subject><subject>Quantitative research</subject><subject>Research and Analysis Methods</subject><subject>Sanitation</subject><subject>Social Sciences</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Systematic review</subject><subject>Teenagers</subject><subject>Womens health</subject><issn>1932-6203</issn><issn>1932-6203</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkl2L1DAUhoso7jr6DwQDguDFjPlomtYLYVj8GFhZ8PMynKZJJ0PbzCbp6vx7MztVtqAgucjh5DnvSU7eLHtK8IowQV7t3OgH6FZ7N-gVpoxWjN_LzknF6LKgmN2_E59lj0LYYcxZWRQPszNG80oQIs6z7x81hNHrXg8R2QHFrUYhjs0BOYNSMkQ_Qoe2Grq4RTA0aHtorR70a7RG4RCi7iFahby-sfrHLQBjY-Pj7IGBLugn077Ivr57--Xiw_Ly6v3mYn25VEVRxaWhRV2WCjiGqqpZXgNpsBBlw6scc5VzRoBCilTJGs5qqGuuhCoIYcBMKdgie3bS3XcuyGkmQdIcV-nhJHGLbHMiGgc7ufe2B3-QDqy8TTjfSvDpCZ2WVBulgJZGizyHwtREGVLwvEr9CTfHbm-mbmPd60aloXnoZqLzk8FuZetupKCCYlwmgeeTgHfXow7xH1eeqBbSrexgXBJTvQ1KrgvKBU9fd6RWf6HSanRvVXKFsSk_K3g5K0hM1D9jC2MIcvP50_-zV9_m7Is77MkqwXVjtG4IczA_gcq7ELw2fyZHsDya-vc05NHUcjI1-wW2sugJ</recordid><startdate>20200604</startdate><enddate>20200604</enddate><creator>Hennegan, Julie</creator><creator>Brooks, Deborah Jordan</creator><creator>Schwab, Kellogg J</creator><creator>Melendez-Torres, G.J</creator><creator>Pant Pai, Nitika</creator><general>Public Library of Science</general><general>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>IOV</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2011-1595</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20200604</creationdate><title>Measurement in the study of menstrual health and hygiene: A systematic review and audit</title><author>Hennegan, Julie ; Brooks, Deborah Jordan ; Schwab, Kellogg J ; Melendez-Torres, G.J ; Pant Pai, Nitika</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c669t-f26b88ca50a99b34ba1d0778d59405c4531a2a05cc83d53babb5c7c6113a3f873</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Absenteeism</topic><topic>Absenteeism (Labor)</topic><topic>Attitudes</topic><topic>Biology and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Environmental health</topic><topic>Girls</topic><topic>Health promotion</topic><topic>Hygiene</topic><topic>Literature reviews</topic><topic>Low income groups</topic><topic>Medical research</topic><topic>Medicine and Health Sciences</topic><topic>Menstrual products</topic><topic>Menstruation</topic><topic>Norms</topic><topic>People and Places</topic><topic>Performance evaluation</topic><topic>Public health</topic><topic>Quantitative research</topic><topic>Research and Analysis Methods</topic><topic>Sanitation</topic><topic>Social Sciences</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Systematic review</topic><topic>Teenagers</topic><topic>Womens health</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hennegan, Julie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brooks, Deborah Jordan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schwab, Kellogg J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Melendez-Torres, G.J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pant Pai, Nitika</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Opposing Viewpoints</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Materials Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hennegan, Julie</au><au>Brooks, Deborah Jordan</au><au>Schwab, Kellogg J</au><au>Melendez-Torres, G.J</au><au>Pant Pai, Nitika</au><au>Pant Pai, Nitika</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Measurement in the study of menstrual health and hygiene: A systematic review and audit</atitle><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle><date>2020-06-04</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>15</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>e0232935</spage><pages>e0232935-</pages><issn>1932-6203</issn><eissn>1932-6203</eissn><abstract>The lack of established measurement tools in the study of menstrual health and hygiene has been a significant limitation of quantitative studies to date. However, there has been limited exploration of existing measurement to identify avenues for improvement. We undertook two linked systematic reviews of (1) trials of menstrual health interventions and their nested studies in low- and middle-income countries, (2) studies developing or validating measures of menstrual experiences from any location. Systematic searching was undertaken in 12 databases, together with handsearching. We iteratively grouped and audited concepts measured across included studies and extracted and compared measures of each concept. A total of 23 trials, 9 nested studies and 22 measure development studies were included. Trials measured a range of outcomes including menstrual knowledge, attitudes, and practices, school absenteeism, and health. Most measure validation studies focused on assessing attitudes towards menstruation, while a group of five studies assessed the accuracy of women's recall of their menstrual characteristics such as timing and cycle length. Measures of menstrual knowledge, attitudes, beliefs and restrictions were inconsistent and frequently overlapped. No two studies measured the same menstrual or hygiene practices, with 44 different practices assessed. This audit provides a summary of current measures and extant efforts to pilot or test their performance. Inconsistencies in both the definition and operationalisation of concepts measured in menstrual health and hygiene research should be addressed. To improve measurement, authors should clearly define the constructs they aim to measure and outline how these were operationalised for measurement. Results of this audit indicate the need for the development and validation of new measures, and the evaluation of the performance of existing measures across contexts. In particular, the definition and measurement of menstrual practices, knowledge, attitudes, norms and restrictions should be addressed.</abstract><cop>San Francisco</cop><pub>Public Library of Science</pub><pmid>32497117</pmid><doi>10.1371/journal.pone.0232935</doi><tpages>e0232935</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2011-1595</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 1932-6203 |
| ispartof | PloS one, 2020-06, Vol.15 (6), p.e0232935 |
| issn | 1932-6203 1932-6203 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_plos_journals_2409620111 |
| source | DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Public Library of Science (PLoS); EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central; Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry |
| subjects | Absenteeism Absenteeism (Labor) Attitudes Biology and Life Sciences Environmental health Girls Health promotion Hygiene Literature reviews Low income groups Medical research Medicine and Health Sciences Menstrual products Menstruation Norms People and Places Performance evaluation Public health Quantitative research Research and Analysis Methods Sanitation Social Sciences Studies Systematic review Teenagers Womens health |
| title | Measurement in the study of menstrual health and hygiene: A systematic review and audit |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-09T20%3A49%3A42IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_plos_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Measurement%20in%20the%20study%20of%20menstrual%20health%20and%20hygiene:%20A%20systematic%20review%20and%20audit&rft.jtitle=PloS%20one&rft.au=Hennegan,%20Julie&rft.date=2020-06-04&rft.volume=15&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=e0232935&rft.pages=e0232935-&rft.issn=1932-6203&rft.eissn=1932-6203&rft_id=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0232935&rft_dat=%3Cgale_plos_%3EA625751171%3C/gale_plos_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2409620111&rft_id=info:pmid/32497117&rft_galeid=A625751171&rft_doaj_id=oai_doaj_org_article_2efcca28fe744a6fb1cf165495cc15f7&rfr_iscdi=true |