Order of same-day concurrent training influences some indices of power development, but not strength, lean mass, or aerobic fitness in healthy, moderately-active men after 9 weeks of training
The importance of concurrent exercise order for improving endurance and resistance adaptations remains unclear, particularly when sessions are performed a few hours apart. We investigated the effects of concurrent training (in alternate orders, separated by ~3 hours) on endurance and resistance trai...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | PloS one 2020-05, Vol.15 (5), p.e0233134-e0233134 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | e0233134 |
---|---|
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | e0233134 |
container_title | PloS one |
container_volume | 15 |
creator | Lee, Matthew J-C Ballantyne, James K Chagolla, Javier Hopkins, William G Fyfe, Jackson J Phillips, Stuart M Bishop, David J Bartlett, Jonathan D |
description | The importance of concurrent exercise order for improving endurance and resistance adaptations remains unclear, particularly when sessions are performed a few hours apart. We investigated the effects of concurrent training (in alternate orders, separated by ~3 hours) on endurance and resistance training adaptations, compared to resistance-only training.
Twenty-nine healthy, moderately-active men (mean ± SD; age 24.5 ± 4.7 y; body mass 74.9 ± 10.8 kg; height 179.7 ± 6.5 cm) performed either resistance-only training (RT, n = 9), or same-day concurrent training whereby high-intensity interval training was performed either 3 hours before (HIIT+RT, n = 10) or after resistance training (RT+HIIT, n = 10), for 3 d.wk-1 over 9 weeks. Training-induced changes in leg press 1-repetition maximal (1-RM) strength, countermovement jump (CMJ) performance, body composition, peak oxygen uptake ([Formula: see text]), aerobic power ([Formula: see text]), and lactate threshold ([Formula: see text]) were assessed before, and after both 5 and 9 weeks of training.
After 9 weeks, all training groups increased leg press 1-RM (~24-28%) and total lean mass (~3-4%), with no clear differences between groups. Both concurrent groups elicited similar small-to-moderate improvements in all markers of aerobic fitness ([Formula: see text] ~8-9%; [Formula: see text] ~16-20%; [Formula: see text] ~14-15%). RT improved CMJ displacement (mean ± SD, 5.3 ± 6.3%), velocity (2.2 ± 2.7%), force (absolute: 10.1 ± 10.1%), and power (absolute: 9.8 ± 7.6%; relative: 6.0 ± 6.6%). HIIT+RT elicited comparable improvements in CMJ velocity only (2.2 ± 2.7%). Compared to RT, RT+HIIT attenuated CMJ displacement (mean difference ± 90%CI, -5.1 ± 4.3%), force (absolute: -8.2 ± 7.1%) and power (absolute: -6.0 ± 4.7%). Only RT+HIIT reduced absolute fat mass (mean ± SD, -11.0 ± 11.7%).
In moderately-active males, concurrent training, regardless of the exercise order, presents a viable strategy to improve lower-body maximal strength and total lean mass comparably to resistance-only training, whilst also improving indices of aerobic fitness. However, improvements in CMJ displacement, force, and power were attenuated when RT was performed before HIIT, and as such, exercise order may be an important consideration when designing training programs in which the goal is to improve lower-body power. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1371/journal.pone.0233134 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_plos_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_plos_journals_2403021236</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A623857365</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_156c7df9b4834ab29718dd8f3abe30ac</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A623857365</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-a8a3b9fc911b0648509262a1ae874ba15807ca9e84d7711cf3c1dbcfef31327b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNk9tu1DAQhiMEoqXwBggsISGQdpfYzvEGqao4rFSpEqdba-JMdl0Se7Gdln06Xo3Z7m7VRb1AuXDsfP8_48lMkjzn6YzLkr-7dKO30M9WzuIsFVJymT1IjnktxbQQqXx45_0oeRLCZZrmsiqKx8mRFFlayoIfJ38ufIueuY4FGHDawpppZ_XoPdrIogdjjV0wY7t-RKsxsOAGpH1rNhvSrdw1GbR4hb1bDaSasGaMzLrIQiSXRVxOWI9g2QAhTJjzDNC7xmjWmWgxBHJjS4Q-LtcTNjjKByL26ynoaK6QkSeDLlKQml0j_ryJus_safKogz7gs916knz_-OHb2efp-cWn-dnp-VQXtYhTqEA2dadrzpu0yKo8rUUhgANWZdYAz6u01FBjlbVlybnupOZtozvsqKyibORJ8nLru-pdULvaB0V1lKngQhZEzLdE6-BSrbwZwK-VA6NuDpxfKPDR6B4Vzwtdtl3dZJXMoBF1yau2rToJDcoUNHm930UbmwFbTVX10B-YHn6xZqkW7kqVQmR5Icjgzc7Au18jhqgGEzT2PVh0403elHlV5Zu8X_2D3n-7HbUAugC1g6O4emOqTilelVM75UTN7qHoaXEw1FfYGTo_ELw9EBAT8XdcwBiCmn_98v_sxY9D9vUddttcwfVjNM6GQzDbgtq7EDx2t0XmqdrM2b4aajNnajdnJHtx9wfdivaDJf8CmSMmTA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2403021236</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Order of same-day concurrent training influences some indices of power development, but not strength, lean mass, or aerobic fitness in healthy, moderately-active men after 9 weeks of training</title><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry</source><creator>Lee, Matthew J-C ; Ballantyne, James K ; Chagolla, Javier ; Hopkins, William G ; Fyfe, Jackson J ; Phillips, Stuart M ; Bishop, David J ; Bartlett, Jonathan D</creator><contributor>Boullosa, Daniel</contributor><creatorcontrib>Lee, Matthew J-C ; Ballantyne, James K ; Chagolla, Javier ; Hopkins, William G ; Fyfe, Jackson J ; Phillips, Stuart M ; Bishop, David J ; Bartlett, Jonathan D ; Boullosa, Daniel</creatorcontrib><description>The importance of concurrent exercise order for improving endurance and resistance adaptations remains unclear, particularly when sessions are performed a few hours apart. We investigated the effects of concurrent training (in alternate orders, separated by ~3 hours) on endurance and resistance training adaptations, compared to resistance-only training.
Twenty-nine healthy, moderately-active men (mean ± SD; age 24.5 ± 4.7 y; body mass 74.9 ± 10.8 kg; height 179.7 ± 6.5 cm) performed either resistance-only training (RT, n = 9), or same-day concurrent training whereby high-intensity interval training was performed either 3 hours before (HIIT+RT, n = 10) or after resistance training (RT+HIIT, n = 10), for 3 d.wk-1 over 9 weeks. Training-induced changes in leg press 1-repetition maximal (1-RM) strength, countermovement jump (CMJ) performance, body composition, peak oxygen uptake ([Formula: see text]), aerobic power ([Formula: see text]), and lactate threshold ([Formula: see text]) were assessed before, and after both 5 and 9 weeks of training.
After 9 weeks, all training groups increased leg press 1-RM (~24-28%) and total lean mass (~3-4%), with no clear differences between groups. Both concurrent groups elicited similar small-to-moderate improvements in all markers of aerobic fitness ([Formula: see text] ~8-9%; [Formula: see text] ~16-20%; [Formula: see text] ~14-15%). RT improved CMJ displacement (mean ± SD, 5.3 ± 6.3%), velocity (2.2 ± 2.7%), force (absolute: 10.1 ± 10.1%), and power (absolute: 9.8 ± 7.6%; relative: 6.0 ± 6.6%). HIIT+RT elicited comparable improvements in CMJ velocity only (2.2 ± 2.7%). Compared to RT, RT+HIIT attenuated CMJ displacement (mean difference ± 90%CI, -5.1 ± 4.3%), force (absolute: -8.2 ± 7.1%) and power (absolute: -6.0 ± 4.7%). Only RT+HIIT reduced absolute fat mass (mean ± SD, -11.0 ± 11.7%).
In moderately-active males, concurrent training, regardless of the exercise order, presents a viable strategy to improve lower-body maximal strength and total lean mass comparably to resistance-only training, whilst also improving indices of aerobic fitness. However, improvements in CMJ displacement, force, and power were attenuated when RT was performed before HIIT, and as such, exercise order may be an important consideration when designing training programs in which the goal is to improve lower-body power.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0233134</identifier><identifier>PMID: 32407361</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Public Library of Science</publisher><subject>Adaptation ; Aerobic respiration ; Athletic ability ; Athletic recruitment ; Australian football ; Biology and Life Sciences ; Body composition ; Body fat ; Body mass ; Cardiorespiratory fitness ; Displacement ; Endurance ; Exercise ; Interval training ; Lactic acid ; Leg ; Medicine and Health Sciences ; Methods ; Muscle strength ; Oxygen ; Oxygen consumption ; Oxygen uptake ; Physical fitness ; Physical Sciences ; Physical training ; Physiological aspects ; Power (Philosophy) ; Professional soccer ; Research and Analysis Methods ; Resistance training ; Social Sciences ; Strength training ; Studies ; Training ; Velocity ; Weight training</subject><ispartof>PloS one, 2020-05, Vol.15 (5), p.e0233134-e0233134</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2020 Public Library of Science</rights><rights>2020 Lee et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>2020 Lee et al 2020 Lee et al</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-a8a3b9fc911b0648509262a1ae874ba15807ca9e84d7711cf3c1dbcfef31327b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-a8a3b9fc911b0648509262a1ae874ba15807ca9e84d7711cf3c1dbcfef31327b3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-6956-9188 ; 0000-0002-1956-4098 ; 0000-0001-9937-3445</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7224562/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7224562/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,315,728,781,785,865,886,2103,2929,23868,27926,27927,53793,53795</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32407361$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Boullosa, Daniel</contributor><creatorcontrib>Lee, Matthew J-C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ballantyne, James K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chagolla, Javier</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hopkins, William G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fyfe, Jackson J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Phillips, Stuart M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bishop, David J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bartlett, Jonathan D</creatorcontrib><title>Order of same-day concurrent training influences some indices of power development, but not strength, lean mass, or aerobic fitness in healthy, moderately-active men after 9 weeks of training</title><title>PloS one</title><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><description>The importance of concurrent exercise order for improving endurance and resistance adaptations remains unclear, particularly when sessions are performed a few hours apart. We investigated the effects of concurrent training (in alternate orders, separated by ~3 hours) on endurance and resistance training adaptations, compared to resistance-only training.
Twenty-nine healthy, moderately-active men (mean ± SD; age 24.5 ± 4.7 y; body mass 74.9 ± 10.8 kg; height 179.7 ± 6.5 cm) performed either resistance-only training (RT, n = 9), or same-day concurrent training whereby high-intensity interval training was performed either 3 hours before (HIIT+RT, n = 10) or after resistance training (RT+HIIT, n = 10), for 3 d.wk-1 over 9 weeks. Training-induced changes in leg press 1-repetition maximal (1-RM) strength, countermovement jump (CMJ) performance, body composition, peak oxygen uptake ([Formula: see text]), aerobic power ([Formula: see text]), and lactate threshold ([Formula: see text]) were assessed before, and after both 5 and 9 weeks of training.
After 9 weeks, all training groups increased leg press 1-RM (~24-28%) and total lean mass (~3-4%), with no clear differences between groups. Both concurrent groups elicited similar small-to-moderate improvements in all markers of aerobic fitness ([Formula: see text] ~8-9%; [Formula: see text] ~16-20%; [Formula: see text] ~14-15%). RT improved CMJ displacement (mean ± SD, 5.3 ± 6.3%), velocity (2.2 ± 2.7%), force (absolute: 10.1 ± 10.1%), and power (absolute: 9.8 ± 7.6%; relative: 6.0 ± 6.6%). HIIT+RT elicited comparable improvements in CMJ velocity only (2.2 ± 2.7%). Compared to RT, RT+HIIT attenuated CMJ displacement (mean difference ± 90%CI, -5.1 ± 4.3%), force (absolute: -8.2 ± 7.1%) and power (absolute: -6.0 ± 4.7%). Only RT+HIIT reduced absolute fat mass (mean ± SD, -11.0 ± 11.7%).
In moderately-active males, concurrent training, regardless of the exercise order, presents a viable strategy to improve lower-body maximal strength and total lean mass comparably to resistance-only training, whilst also improving indices of aerobic fitness. However, improvements in CMJ displacement, force, and power were attenuated when RT was performed before HIIT, and as such, exercise order may be an important consideration when designing training programs in which the goal is to improve lower-body power.</description><subject>Adaptation</subject><subject>Aerobic respiration</subject><subject>Athletic ability</subject><subject>Athletic recruitment</subject><subject>Australian football</subject><subject>Biology and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Body composition</subject><subject>Body fat</subject><subject>Body mass</subject><subject>Cardiorespiratory fitness</subject><subject>Displacement</subject><subject>Endurance</subject><subject>Exercise</subject><subject>Interval training</subject><subject>Lactic acid</subject><subject>Leg</subject><subject>Medicine and Health Sciences</subject><subject>Methods</subject><subject>Muscle strength</subject><subject>Oxygen</subject><subject>Oxygen consumption</subject><subject>Oxygen uptake</subject><subject>Physical fitness</subject><subject>Physical Sciences</subject><subject>Physical training</subject><subject>Physiological aspects</subject><subject>Power (Philosophy)</subject><subject>Professional soccer</subject><subject>Research and Analysis Methods</subject><subject>Resistance training</subject><subject>Social Sciences</subject><subject>Strength training</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Training</subject><subject>Velocity</subject><subject>Weight training</subject><issn>1932-6203</issn><issn>1932-6203</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNqNk9tu1DAQhiMEoqXwBggsISGQdpfYzvEGqao4rFSpEqdba-JMdl0Se7Gdln06Xo3Z7m7VRb1AuXDsfP8_48lMkjzn6YzLkr-7dKO30M9WzuIsFVJymT1IjnktxbQQqXx45_0oeRLCZZrmsiqKx8mRFFlayoIfJ38ufIueuY4FGHDawpppZ_XoPdrIogdjjV0wY7t-RKsxsOAGpH1rNhvSrdw1GbR4hb1bDaSasGaMzLrIQiSXRVxOWI9g2QAhTJjzDNC7xmjWmWgxBHJjS4Q-LtcTNjjKByL26ynoaK6QkSeDLlKQml0j_ryJus_safKogz7gs916knz_-OHb2efp-cWn-dnp-VQXtYhTqEA2dadrzpu0yKo8rUUhgANWZdYAz6u01FBjlbVlybnupOZtozvsqKyibORJ8nLru-pdULvaB0V1lKngQhZEzLdE6-BSrbwZwK-VA6NuDpxfKPDR6B4Vzwtdtl3dZJXMoBF1yau2rToJDcoUNHm930UbmwFbTVX10B-YHn6xZqkW7kqVQmR5Icjgzc7Au18jhqgGEzT2PVh0403elHlV5Zu8X_2D3n-7HbUAugC1g6O4emOqTilelVM75UTN7qHoaXEw1FfYGTo_ELw9EBAT8XdcwBiCmn_98v_sxY9D9vUddttcwfVjNM6GQzDbgtq7EDx2t0XmqdrM2b4aajNnajdnJHtx9wfdivaDJf8CmSMmTA</recordid><startdate>20200514</startdate><enddate>20200514</enddate><creator>Lee, Matthew J-C</creator><creator>Ballantyne, James K</creator><creator>Chagolla, Javier</creator><creator>Hopkins, William G</creator><creator>Fyfe, Jackson J</creator><creator>Phillips, Stuart M</creator><creator>Bishop, David J</creator><creator>Bartlett, Jonathan D</creator><general>Public Library of Science</general><general>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>IOV</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6956-9188</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1956-4098</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9937-3445</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20200514</creationdate><title>Order of same-day concurrent training influences some indices of power development, but not strength, lean mass, or aerobic fitness in healthy, moderately-active men after 9 weeks of training</title><author>Lee, Matthew J-C ; Ballantyne, James K ; Chagolla, Javier ; Hopkins, William G ; Fyfe, Jackson J ; Phillips, Stuart M ; Bishop, David J ; Bartlett, Jonathan D</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-a8a3b9fc911b0648509262a1ae874ba15807ca9e84d7711cf3c1dbcfef31327b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Adaptation</topic><topic>Aerobic respiration</topic><topic>Athletic ability</topic><topic>Athletic recruitment</topic><topic>Australian football</topic><topic>Biology and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Body composition</topic><topic>Body fat</topic><topic>Body mass</topic><topic>Cardiorespiratory fitness</topic><topic>Displacement</topic><topic>Endurance</topic><topic>Exercise</topic><topic>Interval training</topic><topic>Lactic acid</topic><topic>Leg</topic><topic>Medicine and Health Sciences</topic><topic>Methods</topic><topic>Muscle strength</topic><topic>Oxygen</topic><topic>Oxygen consumption</topic><topic>Oxygen uptake</topic><topic>Physical fitness</topic><topic>Physical Sciences</topic><topic>Physical training</topic><topic>Physiological aspects</topic><topic>Power (Philosophy)</topic><topic>Professional soccer</topic><topic>Research and Analysis Methods</topic><topic>Resistance training</topic><topic>Social Sciences</topic><topic>Strength training</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Training</topic><topic>Velocity</topic><topic>Weight training</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lee, Matthew J-C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ballantyne, James K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chagolla, Javier</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hopkins, William G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fyfe, Jackson J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Phillips, Stuart M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bishop, David J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bartlett, Jonathan D</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Opposing Viewpoints</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Materials Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lee, Matthew J-C</au><au>Ballantyne, James K</au><au>Chagolla, Javier</au><au>Hopkins, William G</au><au>Fyfe, Jackson J</au><au>Phillips, Stuart M</au><au>Bishop, David J</au><au>Bartlett, Jonathan D</au><au>Boullosa, Daniel</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Order of same-day concurrent training influences some indices of power development, but not strength, lean mass, or aerobic fitness in healthy, moderately-active men after 9 weeks of training</atitle><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><date>2020-05-14</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>15</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>e0233134</spage><epage>e0233134</epage><pages>e0233134-e0233134</pages><issn>1932-6203</issn><eissn>1932-6203</eissn><abstract>The importance of concurrent exercise order for improving endurance and resistance adaptations remains unclear, particularly when sessions are performed a few hours apart. We investigated the effects of concurrent training (in alternate orders, separated by ~3 hours) on endurance and resistance training adaptations, compared to resistance-only training.
Twenty-nine healthy, moderately-active men (mean ± SD; age 24.5 ± 4.7 y; body mass 74.9 ± 10.8 kg; height 179.7 ± 6.5 cm) performed either resistance-only training (RT, n = 9), or same-day concurrent training whereby high-intensity interval training was performed either 3 hours before (HIIT+RT, n = 10) or after resistance training (RT+HIIT, n = 10), for 3 d.wk-1 over 9 weeks. Training-induced changes in leg press 1-repetition maximal (1-RM) strength, countermovement jump (CMJ) performance, body composition, peak oxygen uptake ([Formula: see text]), aerobic power ([Formula: see text]), and lactate threshold ([Formula: see text]) were assessed before, and after both 5 and 9 weeks of training.
After 9 weeks, all training groups increased leg press 1-RM (~24-28%) and total lean mass (~3-4%), with no clear differences between groups. Both concurrent groups elicited similar small-to-moderate improvements in all markers of aerobic fitness ([Formula: see text] ~8-9%; [Formula: see text] ~16-20%; [Formula: see text] ~14-15%). RT improved CMJ displacement (mean ± SD, 5.3 ± 6.3%), velocity (2.2 ± 2.7%), force (absolute: 10.1 ± 10.1%), and power (absolute: 9.8 ± 7.6%; relative: 6.0 ± 6.6%). HIIT+RT elicited comparable improvements in CMJ velocity only (2.2 ± 2.7%). Compared to RT, RT+HIIT attenuated CMJ displacement (mean difference ± 90%CI, -5.1 ± 4.3%), force (absolute: -8.2 ± 7.1%) and power (absolute: -6.0 ± 4.7%). Only RT+HIIT reduced absolute fat mass (mean ± SD, -11.0 ± 11.7%).
In moderately-active males, concurrent training, regardless of the exercise order, presents a viable strategy to improve lower-body maximal strength and total lean mass comparably to resistance-only training, whilst also improving indices of aerobic fitness. However, improvements in CMJ displacement, force, and power were attenuated when RT was performed before HIIT, and as such, exercise order may be an important consideration when designing training programs in which the goal is to improve lower-body power.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Public Library of Science</pub><pmid>32407361</pmid><doi>10.1371/journal.pone.0233134</doi><tpages>e0233134</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6956-9188</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1956-4098</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9937-3445</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1932-6203 |
ispartof | PloS one, 2020-05, Vol.15 (5), p.e0233134-e0233134 |
issn | 1932-6203 1932-6203 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_plos_journals_2403021236 |
source | DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Public Library of Science (PLoS); EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central; Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry |
subjects | Adaptation Aerobic respiration Athletic ability Athletic recruitment Australian football Biology and Life Sciences Body composition Body fat Body mass Cardiorespiratory fitness Displacement Endurance Exercise Interval training Lactic acid Leg Medicine and Health Sciences Methods Muscle strength Oxygen Oxygen consumption Oxygen uptake Physical fitness Physical Sciences Physical training Physiological aspects Power (Philosophy) Professional soccer Research and Analysis Methods Resistance training Social Sciences Strength training Studies Training Velocity Weight training |
title | Order of same-day concurrent training influences some indices of power development, but not strength, lean mass, or aerobic fitness in healthy, moderately-active men after 9 weeks of training |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-18T07%3A06%3A22IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_plos_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Order%20of%20same-day%20concurrent%20training%20influences%20some%20indices%20of%20power%20development,%20but%20not%20strength,%20lean%20mass,%20or%20aerobic%20fitness%20in%20healthy,%20moderately-active%20men%20after%209%20weeks%20of%20training&rft.jtitle=PloS%20one&rft.au=Lee,%20Matthew%20J-C&rft.date=2020-05-14&rft.volume=15&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=e0233134&rft.epage=e0233134&rft.pages=e0233134-e0233134&rft.issn=1932-6203&rft.eissn=1932-6203&rft_id=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0233134&rft_dat=%3Cgale_plos_%3EA623857365%3C/gale_plos_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2403021236&rft_id=info:pmid/32407361&rft_galeid=A623857365&rft_doaj_id=oai_doaj_org_article_156c7df9b4834ab29718dd8f3abe30ac&rfr_iscdi=true |