Response surface methodology reveals proportionality effects of plant species in conservation plantings on occurrence of generalist predatory arthropods

Multivariate geometric designs for mixture experiments and response surface methodology (RSM) were tested as a means of optimizing plant mixtures to support generalist predatory arthropods. The mixture design included 14 treatment groups, each comprised of six planters and having a proportion of 0.0...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:PloS one 2020-04, Vol.15 (4), p.e0231471-e0231471
Hauptverfasser: Patt, Joseph M, Tarshis Moreno, Aleena M, Niedz, Randall P
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page e0231471
container_issue 4
container_start_page e0231471
container_title PloS one
container_volume 15
creator Patt, Joseph M
Tarshis Moreno, Aleena M
Niedz, Randall P
description Multivariate geometric designs for mixture experiments and response surface methodology (RSM) were tested as a means of optimizing plant mixtures to support generalist predatory arthropods. The mixture design included 14 treatment groups, each comprised of six planters and having a proportion of 0.00, 0.17, 0.33, 0.66, or 1.00 of each plant species. The response variable was the frequency of predators trapped on sticky card traps placed in each group and replaced 2 times per week. The following plant species were used: Spring 2017: Euphorbia milii, E. heterophylla, and Phaseolus lunatus; Summer 2017: E. milii, Fagopyrum esculentum, and Chamaecrista fasciculata; and, Summer 2018: E. milii, F. esculentum, and Portulaca umbraticola. Predator occurrence was influenced by: 1) Linear mixture effects, which indicated that predator occurrence was driven by the amount of a single plant species in the mixture; or, 2) Nonlinear blending effects, which indicated that the plant mixture itself had emergent properties that contributed to predator occurrence. Predator abundance was highest in the Spring 2017 experiment and both linear mixture effects and nonlinear blending effects were observed. Predator occurrence decreased in subsequent experiments, which were conducted in the warmer summer months. In both Summer experiments, only linear mixture effects were observed, indicating that predator occurrence was driven by the amount of a single plant species in the test mixtures: Euphorbia milii in 2017 and Portulaca umbraticola in 2018. The results showed that not only did the species composition of a plant mixture drive predator occurrence but that proportionality of species contributed to the outcome as well. This suggests that, when formulating a plant mixture to aid in conservation biological control consideration should be given to the proportion of each plant species included in the mixture. RSM can be an important tool for achieving the goal of optimizing mixtures of plants for conservation biological control.
doi_str_mv 10.1371/journal.pone.0231471
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_plos_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_plos_journals_2396301217</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A622326416</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_8093cbac29564d1fba8ad824b9859b12</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A622326416</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-dbe95b1baf4ef9d618d72a65b0d39b3ed0c56a904eb0755739c659a2f0813ed43</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNk9tq3DAQhk1padK0b1BaQaG0F7vVwZatm0IIPSwEAunhVsjS2KvgtRxJXrpv0set3HXCbslF0YWE5pv_l0aaLHtJ8JKwkny4caPvVbccXA9LTBnJS_IoOyWC0QWnmD0-WJ9kz0K4wbhgFedPsxNGWV6xnJxmv68hJIUAKIy-URrQBuLaGde5doc8bEF1AQ3eDc5H65KhjTsETQM6BuQaNHSqjygMoC0EZHukJzW_VRO9j9q-TWiPnNaj99Ank5TYQg8-yYWY5MGo6PwOKR_Xk5cJz7MnTbKGF_N8lv34_On7xdfF5dWX1cX55UJzQePC1CCKmtSqyaERhpPKlFTxosaGiZqBwbrgSuAcalwWRcmE5oVQtMEVSdGcnWWv97pD54KcixokZYIzTCgpE7HaE8apGzl4u1F-J52y8u-G861Mx7a6A1lhwXStNBUFzw1palUpU9G8FlUhakKT1sfZbaw3YDT0MdXgSPQ40tu1bN1WlkRgwqsk8G4W8O52hBDlxgYNXaozuHF_7qooMJvQN_-gD99uplqVLmD7xiVfPYnKc04pozwnPFHLB6g0DGxsenFobNo_Snh_lJCYCL9iq8YQ5Orb9f-zVz-P2bcH7Dr9zrgOrhun3xaOwXwPau9C8NDcF5lgOTXQXTXk1EBybqCU9urwge6T7jqG_QErCxqK</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2396301217</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Response surface methodology reveals proportionality effects of plant species in conservation plantings on occurrence of generalist predatory arthropods</title><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Public Library of Science (PLoS) Journals Open Access</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry</source><creator>Patt, Joseph M ; Tarshis Moreno, Aleena M ; Niedz, Randall P</creator><contributor>Prager, Sean Michael</contributor><creatorcontrib>Patt, Joseph M ; Tarshis Moreno, Aleena M ; Niedz, Randall P ; Prager, Sean Michael</creatorcontrib><description>Multivariate geometric designs for mixture experiments and response surface methodology (RSM) were tested as a means of optimizing plant mixtures to support generalist predatory arthropods. The mixture design included 14 treatment groups, each comprised of six planters and having a proportion of 0.00, 0.17, 0.33, 0.66, or 1.00 of each plant species. The response variable was the frequency of predators trapped on sticky card traps placed in each group and replaced 2 times per week. The following plant species were used: Spring 2017: Euphorbia milii, E. heterophylla, and Phaseolus lunatus; Summer 2017: E. milii, Fagopyrum esculentum, and Chamaecrista fasciculata; and, Summer 2018: E. milii, F. esculentum, and Portulaca umbraticola. Predator occurrence was influenced by: 1) Linear mixture effects, which indicated that predator occurrence was driven by the amount of a single plant species in the mixture; or, 2) Nonlinear blending effects, which indicated that the plant mixture itself had emergent properties that contributed to predator occurrence. Predator abundance was highest in the Spring 2017 experiment and both linear mixture effects and nonlinear blending effects were observed. Predator occurrence decreased in subsequent experiments, which were conducted in the warmer summer months. In both Summer experiments, only linear mixture effects were observed, indicating that predator occurrence was driven by the amount of a single plant species in the test mixtures: Euphorbia milii in 2017 and Portulaca umbraticola in 2018. The results showed that not only did the species composition of a plant mixture drive predator occurrence but that proportionality of species contributed to the outcome as well. This suggests that, when formulating a plant mixture to aid in conservation biological control consideration should be given to the proportion of each plant species included in the mixture. RSM can be an important tool for achieving the goal of optimizing mixtures of plants for conservation biological control.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0231471</identifier><identifier>PMID: 32348341</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Public Library of Science</publisher><subject>Agricultural research ; Analysis ; Animal behavior ; Arthropoda ; Arthropods ; Biological control ; Biological pest control ; Biology and Life Sciences ; Blending effects ; Citrus ; Citrus fruits ; Conservation ; Crop diseases ; Design ; Earth Sciences ; Ecology and Environmental Sciences ; Euphorbia milii ; Fagopyrum esculentum ; Flowers &amp; plants ; Horticulture ; Insecticides ; Laboratories ; Methods ; Pheromones ; Physical Sciences ; Plant species ; Portulaca umbraticola ; Predators ; Response surface methodology ; Species composition ; Summer ; Wildlife conservation</subject><ispartof>PloS one, 2020-04, Vol.15 (4), p.e0231471-e0231471</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2020 Public Library of Science</rights><rights>This is an open access article, free of all copyright, and may be freely reproduced, distributed, transmitted, modified, built upon, or otherwise used by anyone for any lawful purpose. The work is made available under the Creative Commons CC0 public domain dedication: https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-dbe95b1baf4ef9d618d72a65b0d39b3ed0c56a904eb0755739c659a2f0813ed43</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-dbe95b1baf4ef9d618d72a65b0d39b3ed0c56a904eb0755739c659a2f0813ed43</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-9105-8520</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7190168/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7190168/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,864,885,2102,2928,23866,27924,27925,53791,53793</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32348341$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Prager, Sean Michael</contributor><creatorcontrib>Patt, Joseph M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tarshis Moreno, Aleena M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Niedz, Randall P</creatorcontrib><title>Response surface methodology reveals proportionality effects of plant species in conservation plantings on occurrence of generalist predatory arthropods</title><title>PloS one</title><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><description>Multivariate geometric designs for mixture experiments and response surface methodology (RSM) were tested as a means of optimizing plant mixtures to support generalist predatory arthropods. The mixture design included 14 treatment groups, each comprised of six planters and having a proportion of 0.00, 0.17, 0.33, 0.66, or 1.00 of each plant species. The response variable was the frequency of predators trapped on sticky card traps placed in each group and replaced 2 times per week. The following plant species were used: Spring 2017: Euphorbia milii, E. heterophylla, and Phaseolus lunatus; Summer 2017: E. milii, Fagopyrum esculentum, and Chamaecrista fasciculata; and, Summer 2018: E. milii, F. esculentum, and Portulaca umbraticola. Predator occurrence was influenced by: 1) Linear mixture effects, which indicated that predator occurrence was driven by the amount of a single plant species in the mixture; or, 2) Nonlinear blending effects, which indicated that the plant mixture itself had emergent properties that contributed to predator occurrence. Predator abundance was highest in the Spring 2017 experiment and both linear mixture effects and nonlinear blending effects were observed. Predator occurrence decreased in subsequent experiments, which were conducted in the warmer summer months. In both Summer experiments, only linear mixture effects were observed, indicating that predator occurrence was driven by the amount of a single plant species in the test mixtures: Euphorbia milii in 2017 and Portulaca umbraticola in 2018. The results showed that not only did the species composition of a plant mixture drive predator occurrence but that proportionality of species contributed to the outcome as well. This suggests that, when formulating a plant mixture to aid in conservation biological control consideration should be given to the proportion of each plant species included in the mixture. RSM can be an important tool for achieving the goal of optimizing mixtures of plants for conservation biological control.</description><subject>Agricultural research</subject><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>Animal behavior</subject><subject>Arthropoda</subject><subject>Arthropods</subject><subject>Biological control</subject><subject>Biological pest control</subject><subject>Biology and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Blending effects</subject><subject>Citrus</subject><subject>Citrus fruits</subject><subject>Conservation</subject><subject>Crop diseases</subject><subject>Design</subject><subject>Earth Sciences</subject><subject>Ecology and Environmental Sciences</subject><subject>Euphorbia milii</subject><subject>Fagopyrum esculentum</subject><subject>Flowers &amp; plants</subject><subject>Horticulture</subject><subject>Insecticides</subject><subject>Laboratories</subject><subject>Methods</subject><subject>Pheromones</subject><subject>Physical Sciences</subject><subject>Plant species</subject><subject>Portulaca umbraticola</subject><subject>Predators</subject><subject>Response surface methodology</subject><subject>Species composition</subject><subject>Summer</subject><subject>Wildlife conservation</subject><issn>1932-6203</issn><issn>1932-6203</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNqNk9tq3DAQhk1padK0b1BaQaG0F7vVwZatm0IIPSwEAunhVsjS2KvgtRxJXrpv0set3HXCbslF0YWE5pv_l0aaLHtJ8JKwkny4caPvVbccXA9LTBnJS_IoOyWC0QWnmD0-WJ9kz0K4wbhgFedPsxNGWV6xnJxmv68hJIUAKIy-URrQBuLaGde5doc8bEF1AQ3eDc5H65KhjTsETQM6BuQaNHSqjygMoC0EZHukJzW_VRO9j9q-TWiPnNaj99Ank5TYQg8-yYWY5MGo6PwOKR_Xk5cJz7MnTbKGF_N8lv34_On7xdfF5dWX1cX55UJzQePC1CCKmtSqyaERhpPKlFTxosaGiZqBwbrgSuAcalwWRcmE5oVQtMEVSdGcnWWv97pD54KcixokZYIzTCgpE7HaE8apGzl4u1F-J52y8u-G861Mx7a6A1lhwXStNBUFzw1palUpU9G8FlUhakKT1sfZbaw3YDT0MdXgSPQ40tu1bN1WlkRgwqsk8G4W8O52hBDlxgYNXaozuHF_7qooMJvQN_-gD99uplqVLmD7xiVfPYnKc04pozwnPFHLB6g0DGxsenFobNo_Snh_lJCYCL9iq8YQ5Orb9f-zVz-P2bcH7Dr9zrgOrhun3xaOwXwPau9C8NDcF5lgOTXQXTXk1EBybqCU9urwge6T7jqG_QErCxqK</recordid><startdate>20200429</startdate><enddate>20200429</enddate><creator>Patt, Joseph M</creator><creator>Tarshis Moreno, Aleena M</creator><creator>Niedz, Randall P</creator><general>Public Library of Science</general><general>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>IOV</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9105-8520</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20200429</creationdate><title>Response surface methodology reveals proportionality effects of plant species in conservation plantings on occurrence of generalist predatory arthropods</title><author>Patt, Joseph M ; Tarshis Moreno, Aleena M ; Niedz, Randall P</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-dbe95b1baf4ef9d618d72a65b0d39b3ed0c56a904eb0755739c659a2f0813ed43</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Agricultural research</topic><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>Animal behavior</topic><topic>Arthropoda</topic><topic>Arthropods</topic><topic>Biological control</topic><topic>Biological pest control</topic><topic>Biology and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Blending effects</topic><topic>Citrus</topic><topic>Citrus fruits</topic><topic>Conservation</topic><topic>Crop diseases</topic><topic>Design</topic><topic>Earth Sciences</topic><topic>Ecology and Environmental Sciences</topic><topic>Euphorbia milii</topic><topic>Fagopyrum esculentum</topic><topic>Flowers &amp; plants</topic><topic>Horticulture</topic><topic>Insecticides</topic><topic>Laboratories</topic><topic>Methods</topic><topic>Pheromones</topic><topic>Physical Sciences</topic><topic>Plant species</topic><topic>Portulaca umbraticola</topic><topic>Predators</topic><topic>Response surface methodology</topic><topic>Species composition</topic><topic>Summer</topic><topic>Wildlife conservation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Patt, Joseph M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tarshis Moreno, Aleena M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Niedz, Randall P</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Opposing Viewpoints</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Materials Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>Access via ProQuest (Open Access)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Patt, Joseph M</au><au>Tarshis Moreno, Aleena M</au><au>Niedz, Randall P</au><au>Prager, Sean Michael</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Response surface methodology reveals proportionality effects of plant species in conservation plantings on occurrence of generalist predatory arthropods</atitle><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><date>2020-04-29</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>15</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>e0231471</spage><epage>e0231471</epage><pages>e0231471-e0231471</pages><issn>1932-6203</issn><eissn>1932-6203</eissn><abstract>Multivariate geometric designs for mixture experiments and response surface methodology (RSM) were tested as a means of optimizing plant mixtures to support generalist predatory arthropods. The mixture design included 14 treatment groups, each comprised of six planters and having a proportion of 0.00, 0.17, 0.33, 0.66, or 1.00 of each plant species. The response variable was the frequency of predators trapped on sticky card traps placed in each group and replaced 2 times per week. The following plant species were used: Spring 2017: Euphorbia milii, E. heterophylla, and Phaseolus lunatus; Summer 2017: E. milii, Fagopyrum esculentum, and Chamaecrista fasciculata; and, Summer 2018: E. milii, F. esculentum, and Portulaca umbraticola. Predator occurrence was influenced by: 1) Linear mixture effects, which indicated that predator occurrence was driven by the amount of a single plant species in the mixture; or, 2) Nonlinear blending effects, which indicated that the plant mixture itself had emergent properties that contributed to predator occurrence. Predator abundance was highest in the Spring 2017 experiment and both linear mixture effects and nonlinear blending effects were observed. Predator occurrence decreased in subsequent experiments, which were conducted in the warmer summer months. In both Summer experiments, only linear mixture effects were observed, indicating that predator occurrence was driven by the amount of a single plant species in the test mixtures: Euphorbia milii in 2017 and Portulaca umbraticola in 2018. The results showed that not only did the species composition of a plant mixture drive predator occurrence but that proportionality of species contributed to the outcome as well. This suggests that, when formulating a plant mixture to aid in conservation biological control consideration should be given to the proportion of each plant species included in the mixture. RSM can be an important tool for achieving the goal of optimizing mixtures of plants for conservation biological control.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Public Library of Science</pub><pmid>32348341</pmid><doi>10.1371/journal.pone.0231471</doi><tpages>e0231471</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9105-8520</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1932-6203
ispartof PloS one, 2020-04, Vol.15 (4), p.e0231471-e0231471
issn 1932-6203
1932-6203
language eng
recordid cdi_plos_journals_2396301217
source DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Public Library of Science (PLoS) Journals Open Access; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central; Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry
subjects Agricultural research
Analysis
Animal behavior
Arthropoda
Arthropods
Biological control
Biological pest control
Biology and Life Sciences
Blending effects
Citrus
Citrus fruits
Conservation
Crop diseases
Design
Earth Sciences
Ecology and Environmental Sciences
Euphorbia milii
Fagopyrum esculentum
Flowers & plants
Horticulture
Insecticides
Laboratories
Methods
Pheromones
Physical Sciences
Plant species
Portulaca umbraticola
Predators
Response surface methodology
Species composition
Summer
Wildlife conservation
title Response surface methodology reveals proportionality effects of plant species in conservation plantings on occurrence of generalist predatory arthropods
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-23T04%3A04%3A50IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_plos_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Response%20surface%20methodology%20reveals%20proportionality%20effects%20of%20plant%20species%20in%20conservation%20plantings%20on%20occurrence%20of%20generalist%20predatory%20arthropods&rft.jtitle=PloS%20one&rft.au=Patt,%20Joseph%20M&rft.date=2020-04-29&rft.volume=15&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=e0231471&rft.epage=e0231471&rft.pages=e0231471-e0231471&rft.issn=1932-6203&rft.eissn=1932-6203&rft_id=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0231471&rft_dat=%3Cgale_plos_%3EA622326416%3C/gale_plos_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2396301217&rft_id=info:pmid/32348341&rft_galeid=A622326416&rft_doaj_id=oai_doaj_org_article_8093cbac29564d1fba8ad824b9859b12&rfr_iscdi=true