The smell of hunger: Norway rats provision social partners based on odour cues of need
When individuals exchange helpful acts reciprocally, increasing the benefit of the receiver can enhance its propensity to return a favour, as pay-offs are typically correlated in iterated interactions. Therefore, reciprocally cooperating animals should consider the relative benefit for the receiver...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | PLoS biology 2020-03, Vol.18 (3), p.e3000628-e3000628 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | e3000628 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | e3000628 |
container_title | PLoS biology |
container_volume | 18 |
creator | Schneeberger, Karin Röder, Gregory Taborsky, Michael |
description | When individuals exchange helpful acts reciprocally, increasing the benefit of the receiver can enhance its propensity to return a favour, as pay-offs are typically correlated in iterated interactions. Therefore, reciprocally cooperating animals should consider the relative benefit for the receiver when deciding to help a conspecific. Norway rats (Rattus norvegicus) exchange food reciprocally and thereby take into account both the cost of helping and the potential benefit to the receiver. By using a variant of the sequential iterated prisoner's dilemma paradigm, we show that rats may determine the need of another individual by olfactory cues alone. In an experimental food-exchange task, test subjects were provided with odour cues from hungry or satiated conspecifics located in a different room. Our results show that wild-type Norway rats provide help to a stooge quicker when they receive odour cues from a hungry rather than from a satiated conspecific. Using chemical analysis by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS), we identify seven volatile organic compounds that differ in their abundance between hungry and satiated rats. Combined, this "smell of hunger" can apparently serve as a reliable cue of need in reciprocal cooperation, which supports the hypothesis of honest signalling. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1371/journal.pbio.3000628 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_plos_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_plos_journals_2390718330</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A619138370</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_eccd4470e2584416bce65cf899fc191c</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A619138370</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c695t-524bd6ae2db7bfae2ff0aa4cc2c0c539d1d8a317e081e9ca5b0674828ca768753</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqVk01v1DAQhiMEoqXwDxBY4gKHXfwZ2xyQqoqPlapWgtKr5TiTXa-y8dZOCv33OGxadVEPIB9s2c-8nnntKYqXBM8Jk-T9Ogyxs-18W_kwZxjjkqpHxSERXMykUuLxvfVB8SylNcaUaqqeFgeMUqw44YfF5cUKUNpA26LQoNXQLSF-QGch_rQ3KNo-oW0M1z750KEUnLct2trYdxATqmyCGuWDUOdckBsgjSIdQP28eNLYNsGLaT4qfnz-dHHydXZ6_mVxcnw6c6UW_UxQXtWlBVpXsmry3DTYWu4cddgJpmtSK8uIBKwIaGdFhUvJFVXOylJJwY6K1zvdbRuSmSxJhjKNJVGM4UwsdkQd7Npso9_YeGOC9ebPRohLk-vxrgUDztWcSwxUKM5JWTkohWuU1o0jmris9XG6bag2UDvo-mjbPdH9k86vzDJcG4k11UJmgbeTQAxX2a7ebHxy2XzbQRjGvBXDhGs65v3mL_Th6iZqaXMBvmtCvteNoua4zDlnPTlS8weoPGrYeBc6aHze3wt4txeQmR5-9Us7pGQW37_9B3v27-z55T7Ld6yLIaUIzZ3PBJuxA24NMWMHmKkDctir-290F3T75dlvV90Agw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2390718330</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The smell of hunger: Norway rats provision social partners based on odour cues of need</title><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</source><creator>Schneeberger, Karin ; Röder, Gregory ; Taborsky, Michael</creator><creatorcontrib>Schneeberger, Karin ; Röder, Gregory ; Taborsky, Michael</creatorcontrib><description>When individuals exchange helpful acts reciprocally, increasing the benefit of the receiver can enhance its propensity to return a favour, as pay-offs are typically correlated in iterated interactions. Therefore, reciprocally cooperating animals should consider the relative benefit for the receiver when deciding to help a conspecific. Norway rats (Rattus norvegicus) exchange food reciprocally and thereby take into account both the cost of helping and the potential benefit to the receiver. By using a variant of the sequential iterated prisoner's dilemma paradigm, we show that rats may determine the need of another individual by olfactory cues alone. In an experimental food-exchange task, test subjects were provided with odour cues from hungry or satiated conspecifics located in a different room. Our results show that wild-type Norway rats provide help to a stooge quicker when they receive odour cues from a hungry rather than from a satiated conspecific. Using chemical analysis by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS), we identify seven volatile organic compounds that differ in their abundance between hungry and satiated rats. Combined, this "smell of hunger" can apparently serve as a reliable cue of need in reciprocal cooperation, which supports the hypothesis of honest signalling.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1545-7885</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1544-9173</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1545-7885</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1371/journal.pbio.3000628</identifier><identifier>PMID: 32208414</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Public Library of Science</publisher><subject>Animals ; Behavior ; Biology and Life Sciences ; Chemical analysis ; Chemical stimuli ; Communications equipment ; Conspecific odors ; Conspecifics ; Cooperation ; Evolution ; Exchanging ; Food ; Gas chromatography ; Hunger ; Instrument industry ; Mass spectrometry ; Mass spectroscopy ; Medicine and Health Sciences ; Olfactory stimuli ; Organic compounds ; Physical Sciences ; Rats ; Research and Analysis Methods ; Short Reports ; Smell ; Social Sciences ; VOCs ; Volatile organic compounds</subject><ispartof>PLoS biology, 2020-03, Vol.18 (3), p.e3000628-e3000628</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2020 Public Library of Science</rights><rights>2020 Schneeberger et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>2020 Schneeberger et al 2020 Schneeberger et al</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c695t-524bd6ae2db7bfae2ff0aa4cc2c0c539d1d8a317e081e9ca5b0674828ca768753</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c695t-524bd6ae2db7bfae2ff0aa4cc2c0c539d1d8a317e081e9ca5b0674828ca768753</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-2098-2542 ; 0000-0002-1357-4316 ; 0000-0002-7110-294X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7092957/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7092957/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,860,881,2096,2915,23845,27901,27902,53766,53768,79342,79343</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32208414$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Schneeberger, Karin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Röder, Gregory</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Taborsky, Michael</creatorcontrib><title>The smell of hunger: Norway rats provision social partners based on odour cues of need</title><title>PLoS biology</title><addtitle>PLoS Biol</addtitle><description>When individuals exchange helpful acts reciprocally, increasing the benefit of the receiver can enhance its propensity to return a favour, as pay-offs are typically correlated in iterated interactions. Therefore, reciprocally cooperating animals should consider the relative benefit for the receiver when deciding to help a conspecific. Norway rats (Rattus norvegicus) exchange food reciprocally and thereby take into account both the cost of helping and the potential benefit to the receiver. By using a variant of the sequential iterated prisoner's dilemma paradigm, we show that rats may determine the need of another individual by olfactory cues alone. In an experimental food-exchange task, test subjects were provided with odour cues from hungry or satiated conspecifics located in a different room. Our results show that wild-type Norway rats provide help to a stooge quicker when they receive odour cues from a hungry rather than from a satiated conspecific. Using chemical analysis by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS), we identify seven volatile organic compounds that differ in their abundance between hungry and satiated rats. Combined, this "smell of hunger" can apparently serve as a reliable cue of need in reciprocal cooperation, which supports the hypothesis of honest signalling.</description><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Behavior</subject><subject>Biology and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Chemical analysis</subject><subject>Chemical stimuli</subject><subject>Communications equipment</subject><subject>Conspecific odors</subject><subject>Conspecifics</subject><subject>Cooperation</subject><subject>Evolution</subject><subject>Exchanging</subject><subject>Food</subject><subject>Gas chromatography</subject><subject>Hunger</subject><subject>Instrument industry</subject><subject>Mass spectrometry</subject><subject>Mass spectroscopy</subject><subject>Medicine and Health Sciences</subject><subject>Olfactory stimuli</subject><subject>Organic compounds</subject><subject>Physical Sciences</subject><subject>Rats</subject><subject>Research and Analysis Methods</subject><subject>Short Reports</subject><subject>Smell</subject><subject>Social Sciences</subject><subject>VOCs</subject><subject>Volatile organic compounds</subject><issn>1545-7885</issn><issn>1544-9173</issn><issn>1545-7885</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNqVk01v1DAQhiMEoqXwDxBY4gKHXfwZ2xyQqoqPlapWgtKr5TiTXa-y8dZOCv33OGxadVEPIB9s2c-8nnntKYqXBM8Jk-T9Ogyxs-18W_kwZxjjkqpHxSERXMykUuLxvfVB8SylNcaUaqqeFgeMUqw44YfF5cUKUNpA26LQoNXQLSF-QGch_rQ3KNo-oW0M1z750KEUnLct2trYdxATqmyCGuWDUOdckBsgjSIdQP28eNLYNsGLaT4qfnz-dHHydXZ6_mVxcnw6c6UW_UxQXtWlBVpXsmry3DTYWu4cddgJpmtSK8uIBKwIaGdFhUvJFVXOylJJwY6K1zvdbRuSmSxJhjKNJVGM4UwsdkQd7Npso9_YeGOC9ebPRohLk-vxrgUDztWcSwxUKM5JWTkohWuU1o0jmris9XG6bag2UDvo-mjbPdH9k86vzDJcG4k11UJmgbeTQAxX2a7ebHxy2XzbQRjGvBXDhGs65v3mL_Th6iZqaXMBvmtCvteNoua4zDlnPTlS8weoPGrYeBc6aHze3wt4txeQmR5-9Us7pGQW37_9B3v27-z55T7Ld6yLIaUIzZ3PBJuxA24NMWMHmKkDctir-290F3T75dlvV90Agw</recordid><startdate>20200324</startdate><enddate>20200324</enddate><creator>Schneeberger, Karin</creator><creator>Röder, Gregory</creator><creator>Taborsky, Michael</creator><general>Public Library of Science</general><general>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>IOV</scope><scope>ISN</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope><scope>CZG</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2098-2542</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1357-4316</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7110-294X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20200324</creationdate><title>The smell of hunger: Norway rats provision social partners based on odour cues of need</title><author>Schneeberger, Karin ; Röder, Gregory ; Taborsky, Michael</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c695t-524bd6ae2db7bfae2ff0aa4cc2c0c539d1d8a317e081e9ca5b0674828ca768753</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Behavior</topic><topic>Biology and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Chemical analysis</topic><topic>Chemical stimuli</topic><topic>Communications equipment</topic><topic>Conspecific odors</topic><topic>Conspecifics</topic><topic>Cooperation</topic><topic>Evolution</topic><topic>Exchanging</topic><topic>Food</topic><topic>Gas chromatography</topic><topic>Hunger</topic><topic>Instrument industry</topic><topic>Mass spectrometry</topic><topic>Mass spectroscopy</topic><topic>Medicine and Health Sciences</topic><topic>Olfactory stimuli</topic><topic>Organic compounds</topic><topic>Physical Sciences</topic><topic>Rats</topic><topic>Research and Analysis Methods</topic><topic>Short Reports</topic><topic>Smell</topic><topic>Social Sciences</topic><topic>VOCs</topic><topic>Volatile organic compounds</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Schneeberger, Karin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Röder, Gregory</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Taborsky, Michael</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Opposing Viewpoints</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Canada</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><collection>PLoS Biology</collection><jtitle>PLoS biology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Schneeberger, Karin</au><au>Röder, Gregory</au><au>Taborsky, Michael</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The smell of hunger: Norway rats provision social partners based on odour cues of need</atitle><jtitle>PLoS biology</jtitle><addtitle>PLoS Biol</addtitle><date>2020-03-24</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>18</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>e3000628</spage><epage>e3000628</epage><pages>e3000628-e3000628</pages><issn>1545-7885</issn><issn>1544-9173</issn><eissn>1545-7885</eissn><abstract>When individuals exchange helpful acts reciprocally, increasing the benefit of the receiver can enhance its propensity to return a favour, as pay-offs are typically correlated in iterated interactions. Therefore, reciprocally cooperating animals should consider the relative benefit for the receiver when deciding to help a conspecific. Norway rats (Rattus norvegicus) exchange food reciprocally and thereby take into account both the cost of helping and the potential benefit to the receiver. By using a variant of the sequential iterated prisoner's dilemma paradigm, we show that rats may determine the need of another individual by olfactory cues alone. In an experimental food-exchange task, test subjects were provided with odour cues from hungry or satiated conspecifics located in a different room. Our results show that wild-type Norway rats provide help to a stooge quicker when they receive odour cues from a hungry rather than from a satiated conspecific. Using chemical analysis by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS), we identify seven volatile organic compounds that differ in their abundance between hungry and satiated rats. Combined, this "smell of hunger" can apparently serve as a reliable cue of need in reciprocal cooperation, which supports the hypothesis of honest signalling.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Public Library of Science</pub><pmid>32208414</pmid><doi>10.1371/journal.pbio.3000628</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2098-2542</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1357-4316</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7110-294X</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1545-7885 |
ispartof | PLoS biology, 2020-03, Vol.18 (3), p.e3000628-e3000628 |
issn | 1545-7885 1544-9173 1545-7885 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_plos_journals_2390718330 |
source | DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; PubMed Central; Public Library of Science (PLoS) |
subjects | Animals Behavior Biology and Life Sciences Chemical analysis Chemical stimuli Communications equipment Conspecific odors Conspecifics Cooperation Evolution Exchanging Food Gas chromatography Hunger Instrument industry Mass spectrometry Mass spectroscopy Medicine and Health Sciences Olfactory stimuli Organic compounds Physical Sciences Rats Research and Analysis Methods Short Reports Smell Social Sciences VOCs Volatile organic compounds |
title | The smell of hunger: Norway rats provision social partners based on odour cues of need |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-12T21%3A43%3A14IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_plos_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20smell%20of%20hunger:%20Norway%20rats%20provision%20social%20partners%20based%20on%20odour%20cues%20of%20need&rft.jtitle=PLoS%20biology&rft.au=Schneeberger,%20Karin&rft.date=2020-03-24&rft.volume=18&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=e3000628&rft.epage=e3000628&rft.pages=e3000628-e3000628&rft.issn=1545-7885&rft.eissn=1545-7885&rft_id=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pbio.3000628&rft_dat=%3Cgale_plos_%3EA619138370%3C/gale_plos_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2390718330&rft_id=info:pmid/32208414&rft_galeid=A619138370&rft_doaj_id=oai_doaj_org_article_eccd4470e2584416bce65cf899fc191c&rfr_iscdi=true |