Development and evaluation of a food frequency questionnaire for use among young children
This study described the development of a parent food frequency questionnaire (FFQ) for measuring diets of young children over the past month and the validation of this FFQ against three non-consecutive 24 hour recalls. Food and nutrient intakes from a 68-item FFQ were compared with three non-consec...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | PloS one 2020-03, Vol.15 (3), p.e0230669-e0230669 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | e0230669 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | e0230669 |
container_title | PloS one |
container_volume | 15 |
creator | Zheng, Miaobing Campbell, Karen J Scanlan, Emily McNaughton, Sarah A |
description | This study described the development of a parent food frequency questionnaire (FFQ) for measuring diets of young children over the past month and the validation of this FFQ against three non-consecutive 24 hour recalls.
Food and nutrient intakes from a 68-item FFQ were compared with three non-consecutive 24 hour recalls in a follow-up cohort of children aged 1.5, 3.5 and 5.0 years old. Data from both methods were available for 231, 172 and 187 participants at ages 1.5, 3.5 and 5.0 years, respectively.
Out of 11 nutrients, four (protein, fat, fibre, iron), two (Vitamin C, folate) and three (protein, vitamin C and folate) nutrients showed good-acceptable outcome for 2 out of 3 group-level validation tests at ages 1.5, 3.5 and 5.0 years, respectively. Of 26 food groups, good-acceptable outcome for 2 out of 3 group-level validation tests was revealed for two, four and six food groups at ages 1.5, 3.5 and 5.0 years, respectively. For individual-level validation tests, all nutrients showed good-acceptable outcome for 2 out of 3 individual level tests across three time points, except for folate at age 1.5 years and energy intake at age 3.5 years. Most food groups (22 out of 26) at age 1.5 years and all food groups at both ages 3.5 and 5.0 years showed good-acceptable outcome for 2 out of 3 individual-level validation tests.
At all three time points, the FFQ demonstrated good-acceptable validity for some nutrients and food groups at group-level, and good-acceptable validity for most nutrients and food groups at individual-level. This quantitative FFQ is a valid and robust tool for assessing total diet of young children and ranking individuals according to nutrient and food intakes. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1371/journal.pone.0230669 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_plos_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_plos_journals_2382996364</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A618524038</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_148d0e4527a54b8a8ee9564ed564d59b</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A618524038</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-3c876a136df0e9da5ee2c98e597cbdcc6bb1d92f836a4435182ddb5ab8be9c913</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNk9uK2zAQhk1p6W63fYPSGgqlvUiqgy1LN4VlewosLPQEvRKyNE4cFCmV7NC8feXEu8RlL4pBMppvfnl-z2TZc4zmmFb43dr3wSk733oHc0QoYkw8yM6xoGTGCKIPT97PsicxrhEqKWfscXZGCcGoYNV59usD7MD67QZclytnctgp26uu9S73Ta7yxnuTNwF-9-D0Pk9bHIJOtQFSMOR9hFxtvFvme9-nVa9aawK4p9mjRtkIz8b9Ivvx6eP3qy-z65vPi6vL65lmgnQzqnnFFKbMNAiEUSUA0YJDKSpdG61ZXWMjSMMpU0VBS8yJMXWpal6D0ALTi-zlUXdrfZSjK1ESyokQjLIiEYsjYbxay21oNyrspVetPBz4sJQqdK22IHHBDYKiJJUqi5orDiBKVoBJiylFnbTej7f19QaMTrYFZSei04hrV3Lpd7JCouAFTwJvRoHgD2bKTRs1WKsc-P7w3anIktMBffUPen91I7VUqYDWNT7dqwdReckwL0mBDlrze6j0GNi0OrVQ06bzScLbSUJiOvjTLVUfo1x8-_r_7M3PKfv6hF2Bst0qetsPTRWnYHEEdfAxBmjuTMZIDhNw64YcJkCOE5DSXpz-oLuk25anfwE-KQG3</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2382996364</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Development and evaluation of a food frequency questionnaire for use among young children</title><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry</source><source>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</source><creator>Zheng, Miaobing ; Campbell, Karen J ; Scanlan, Emily ; McNaughton, Sarah A</creator><creatorcontrib>Zheng, Miaobing ; Campbell, Karen J ; Scanlan, Emily ; McNaughton, Sarah A</creatorcontrib><description>This study described the development of a parent food frequency questionnaire (FFQ) for measuring diets of young children over the past month and the validation of this FFQ against three non-consecutive 24 hour recalls.
Food and nutrient intakes from a 68-item FFQ were compared with three non-consecutive 24 hour recalls in a follow-up cohort of children aged 1.5, 3.5 and 5.0 years old. Data from both methods were available for 231, 172 and 187 participants at ages 1.5, 3.5 and 5.0 years, respectively.
Out of 11 nutrients, four (protein, fat, fibre, iron), two (Vitamin C, folate) and three (protein, vitamin C and folate) nutrients showed good-acceptable outcome for 2 out of 3 group-level validation tests at ages 1.5, 3.5 and 5.0 years, respectively. Of 26 food groups, good-acceptable outcome for 2 out of 3 group-level validation tests was revealed for two, four and six food groups at ages 1.5, 3.5 and 5.0 years, respectively. For individual-level validation tests, all nutrients showed good-acceptable outcome for 2 out of 3 individual level tests across three time points, except for folate at age 1.5 years and energy intake at age 3.5 years. Most food groups (22 out of 26) at age 1.5 years and all food groups at both ages 3.5 and 5.0 years showed good-acceptable outcome for 2 out of 3 individual-level validation tests.
At all three time points, the FFQ demonstrated good-acceptable validity for some nutrients and food groups at group-level, and good-acceptable validity for most nutrients and food groups at individual-level. This quantitative FFQ is a valid and robust tool for assessing total diet of young children and ranking individuals according to nutrient and food intakes.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0230669</identifier><identifier>PMID: 32210467</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Public Library of Science</publisher><subject>Age ; Ascorbic acid ; Authorship ; Biology and Life Sciences ; Caregivers ; Children ; Children & youth ; Comparative analysis ; Diet ; Energy intake ; Exercise ; Folic acid ; Food ; Food groups ; Food habits ; Food intake ; Maternal & child health ; Medicine and Health Sciences ; Methods ; Nutrients ; Nutrition research ; Obesity ; Parent educational background ; Parents & parenting ; People and Places ; Physical fitness ; Preschool children ; Prevention ; Proteins ; Questionnaires ; Rankings ; Studies ; Surveys ; Time ; Vitamin C ; Vitamins</subject><ispartof>PloS one, 2020-03, Vol.15 (3), p.e0230669-e0230669</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2020 Public Library of Science</rights><rights>2020 Zheng et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>2020 Zheng et al 2020 Zheng et al</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-3c876a136df0e9da5ee2c98e597cbdcc6bb1d92f836a4435182ddb5ab8be9c913</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-3c876a136df0e9da5ee2c98e597cbdcc6bb1d92f836a4435182ddb5ab8be9c913</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-4151-3502</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7094848/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7094848/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,860,881,2096,2915,23845,27901,27902,53766,53768,79342,79343</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32210467$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Zheng, Miaobing</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Campbell, Karen J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Scanlan, Emily</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McNaughton, Sarah A</creatorcontrib><title>Development and evaluation of a food frequency questionnaire for use among young children</title><title>PloS one</title><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><description>This study described the development of a parent food frequency questionnaire (FFQ) for measuring diets of young children over the past month and the validation of this FFQ against three non-consecutive 24 hour recalls.
Food and nutrient intakes from a 68-item FFQ were compared with three non-consecutive 24 hour recalls in a follow-up cohort of children aged 1.5, 3.5 and 5.0 years old. Data from both methods were available for 231, 172 and 187 participants at ages 1.5, 3.5 and 5.0 years, respectively.
Out of 11 nutrients, four (protein, fat, fibre, iron), two (Vitamin C, folate) and three (protein, vitamin C and folate) nutrients showed good-acceptable outcome for 2 out of 3 group-level validation tests at ages 1.5, 3.5 and 5.0 years, respectively. Of 26 food groups, good-acceptable outcome for 2 out of 3 group-level validation tests was revealed for two, four and six food groups at ages 1.5, 3.5 and 5.0 years, respectively. For individual-level validation tests, all nutrients showed good-acceptable outcome for 2 out of 3 individual level tests across three time points, except for folate at age 1.5 years and energy intake at age 3.5 years. Most food groups (22 out of 26) at age 1.5 years and all food groups at both ages 3.5 and 5.0 years showed good-acceptable outcome for 2 out of 3 individual-level validation tests.
At all three time points, the FFQ demonstrated good-acceptable validity for some nutrients and food groups at group-level, and good-acceptable validity for most nutrients and food groups at individual-level. This quantitative FFQ is a valid and robust tool for assessing total diet of young children and ranking individuals according to nutrient and food intakes.</description><subject>Age</subject><subject>Ascorbic acid</subject><subject>Authorship</subject><subject>Biology and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Caregivers</subject><subject>Children</subject><subject>Children & youth</subject><subject>Comparative analysis</subject><subject>Diet</subject><subject>Energy intake</subject><subject>Exercise</subject><subject>Folic acid</subject><subject>Food</subject><subject>Food groups</subject><subject>Food habits</subject><subject>Food intake</subject><subject>Maternal & child health</subject><subject>Medicine and Health Sciences</subject><subject>Methods</subject><subject>Nutrients</subject><subject>Nutrition research</subject><subject>Obesity</subject><subject>Parent educational background</subject><subject>Parents & parenting</subject><subject>People and Places</subject><subject>Physical fitness</subject><subject>Preschool children</subject><subject>Prevention</subject><subject>Proteins</subject><subject>Questionnaires</subject><subject>Rankings</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Surveys</subject><subject>Time</subject><subject>Vitamin C</subject><subject>Vitamins</subject><issn>1932-6203</issn><issn>1932-6203</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNqNk9uK2zAQhk1p6W63fYPSGgqlvUiqgy1LN4VlewosLPQEvRKyNE4cFCmV7NC8feXEu8RlL4pBMppvfnl-z2TZc4zmmFb43dr3wSk733oHc0QoYkw8yM6xoGTGCKIPT97PsicxrhEqKWfscXZGCcGoYNV59usD7MD67QZclytnctgp26uu9S73Ta7yxnuTNwF-9-D0Pk9bHIJOtQFSMOR9hFxtvFvme9-nVa9aawK4p9mjRtkIz8b9Ivvx6eP3qy-z65vPi6vL65lmgnQzqnnFFKbMNAiEUSUA0YJDKSpdG61ZXWMjSMMpU0VBS8yJMXWpal6D0ALTi-zlUXdrfZSjK1ESyokQjLIiEYsjYbxay21oNyrspVetPBz4sJQqdK22IHHBDYKiJJUqi5orDiBKVoBJiylFnbTej7f19QaMTrYFZSei04hrV3Lpd7JCouAFTwJvRoHgD2bKTRs1WKsc-P7w3anIktMBffUPen91I7VUqYDWNT7dqwdReckwL0mBDlrze6j0GNi0OrVQ06bzScLbSUJiOvjTLVUfo1x8-_r_7M3PKfv6hF2Bst0qetsPTRWnYHEEdfAxBmjuTMZIDhNw64YcJkCOE5DSXpz-oLuk25anfwE-KQG3</recordid><startdate>20200325</startdate><enddate>20200325</enddate><creator>Zheng, Miaobing</creator><creator>Campbell, Karen J</creator><creator>Scanlan, Emily</creator><creator>McNaughton, Sarah A</creator><general>Public Library of Science</general><general>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>IOV</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4151-3502</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20200325</creationdate><title>Development and evaluation of a food frequency questionnaire for use among young children</title><author>Zheng, Miaobing ; Campbell, Karen J ; Scanlan, Emily ; McNaughton, Sarah A</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-3c876a136df0e9da5ee2c98e597cbdcc6bb1d92f836a4435182ddb5ab8be9c913</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Age</topic><topic>Ascorbic acid</topic><topic>Authorship</topic><topic>Biology and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Caregivers</topic><topic>Children</topic><topic>Children & youth</topic><topic>Comparative analysis</topic><topic>Diet</topic><topic>Energy intake</topic><topic>Exercise</topic><topic>Folic acid</topic><topic>Food</topic><topic>Food groups</topic><topic>Food habits</topic><topic>Food intake</topic><topic>Maternal & child health</topic><topic>Medicine and Health Sciences</topic><topic>Methods</topic><topic>Nutrients</topic><topic>Nutrition research</topic><topic>Obesity</topic><topic>Parent educational background</topic><topic>Parents & parenting</topic><topic>People and Places</topic><topic>Physical fitness</topic><topic>Preschool children</topic><topic>Prevention</topic><topic>Proteins</topic><topic>Questionnaires</topic><topic>Rankings</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Surveys</topic><topic>Time</topic><topic>Vitamin C</topic><topic>Vitamins</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Zheng, Miaobing</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Campbell, Karen J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Scanlan, Emily</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McNaughton, Sarah A</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Opposing Viewpoints</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Materials Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Zheng, Miaobing</au><au>Campbell, Karen J</au><au>Scanlan, Emily</au><au>McNaughton, Sarah A</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Development and evaluation of a food frequency questionnaire for use among young children</atitle><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><date>2020-03-25</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>15</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>e0230669</spage><epage>e0230669</epage><pages>e0230669-e0230669</pages><issn>1932-6203</issn><eissn>1932-6203</eissn><abstract>This study described the development of a parent food frequency questionnaire (FFQ) for measuring diets of young children over the past month and the validation of this FFQ against three non-consecutive 24 hour recalls.
Food and nutrient intakes from a 68-item FFQ were compared with three non-consecutive 24 hour recalls in a follow-up cohort of children aged 1.5, 3.5 and 5.0 years old. Data from both methods were available for 231, 172 and 187 participants at ages 1.5, 3.5 and 5.0 years, respectively.
Out of 11 nutrients, four (protein, fat, fibre, iron), two (Vitamin C, folate) and three (protein, vitamin C and folate) nutrients showed good-acceptable outcome for 2 out of 3 group-level validation tests at ages 1.5, 3.5 and 5.0 years, respectively. Of 26 food groups, good-acceptable outcome for 2 out of 3 group-level validation tests was revealed for two, four and six food groups at ages 1.5, 3.5 and 5.0 years, respectively. For individual-level validation tests, all nutrients showed good-acceptable outcome for 2 out of 3 individual level tests across three time points, except for folate at age 1.5 years and energy intake at age 3.5 years. Most food groups (22 out of 26) at age 1.5 years and all food groups at both ages 3.5 and 5.0 years showed good-acceptable outcome for 2 out of 3 individual-level validation tests.
At all three time points, the FFQ demonstrated good-acceptable validity for some nutrients and food groups at group-level, and good-acceptable validity for most nutrients and food groups at individual-level. This quantitative FFQ is a valid and robust tool for assessing total diet of young children and ranking individuals according to nutrient and food intakes.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Public Library of Science</pub><pmid>32210467</pmid><doi>10.1371/journal.pone.0230669</doi><tpages>e0230669</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4151-3502</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1932-6203 |
ispartof | PloS one, 2020-03, Vol.15 (3), p.e0230669-e0230669 |
issn | 1932-6203 1932-6203 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_plos_journals_2382996364 |
source | DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; PubMed Central; Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry; Public Library of Science (PLoS) |
subjects | Age Ascorbic acid Authorship Biology and Life Sciences Caregivers Children Children & youth Comparative analysis Diet Energy intake Exercise Folic acid Food Food groups Food habits Food intake Maternal & child health Medicine and Health Sciences Methods Nutrients Nutrition research Obesity Parent educational background Parents & parenting People and Places Physical fitness Preschool children Prevention Proteins Questionnaires Rankings Studies Surveys Time Vitamin C Vitamins |
title | Development and evaluation of a food frequency questionnaire for use among young children |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-05T06%3A51%3A09IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_plos_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Development%20and%20evaluation%20of%20a%20food%20frequency%20questionnaire%20for%20use%20among%20young%20children&rft.jtitle=PloS%20one&rft.au=Zheng,%20Miaobing&rft.date=2020-03-25&rft.volume=15&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=e0230669&rft.epage=e0230669&rft.pages=e0230669-e0230669&rft.issn=1932-6203&rft.eissn=1932-6203&rft_id=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0230669&rft_dat=%3Cgale_plos_%3EA618524038%3C/gale_plos_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2382996364&rft_id=info:pmid/32210467&rft_galeid=A618524038&rft_doaj_id=oai_doaj_org_article_148d0e4527a54b8a8ee9564ed564d59b&rfr_iscdi=true |