A 3-gene biomarker signature to predict response to taxane-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer

Breast cancer is the most common cancer in women worldwide, affecting one in eight women in their lifetime. Taxane-based chemotherapy is routinely used in the treatment of breast cancer. The purpose of this study was to develop and validate a predictive biomarker to improve the benefit/risk ratio fo...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:PloS one 2020-03, Vol.15 (3), p.e0230313-e0230313
Hauptverfasser: Kallarackal, Jim, Burger, Florian, Bianco, Stefano, Romualdi, Alessandro, Schad, Martina
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page e0230313
container_issue 3
container_start_page e0230313
container_title PloS one
container_volume 15
creator Kallarackal, Jim
Burger, Florian
Bianco, Stefano
Romualdi, Alessandro
Schad, Martina
description Breast cancer is the most common cancer in women worldwide, affecting one in eight women in their lifetime. Taxane-based chemotherapy is routinely used in the treatment of breast cancer. The purpose of this study was to develop and validate a predictive biomarker to improve the benefit/risk ratio for that cytotoxic chemotherapy. We explicitly strived for a biomarker that enables secure translation into clinical practice. We used genome-wide gene expression data of the Hatzis et al. discovery cohort of 310 patients for biomarker development and three independent cohorts with a total of 567 breast cancer patients for validation. We were able to develop a biomarker signature that consists of just the three gene products ELF5, SCUBE2 and NFIB, measured on RNA level. Compared to Hatzis et al., we achieved a significant improvement in predicting responders and non-responders in the Hatzis et al. validation cohort with an area under the receiver operating characteristics curve of 0.73 [95% CI, 69%-77%]. Moreover, we could confirm the performance of our biomarker on two further independent validation cohorts. The overall performance on all three validation cohorts expressed as area under the receiver operating characteristics curve was 0.75 [95% CI, 70%-80%]. At the clinically relevant classifier's operation point to optimize the exclusion of non-responders, the biomarker correctly predicts three out of four patients not responding to neoadjuvant taxane-based chemotherapy, independent of the breast cancer subtype. At the same time, the response rate in the group of predicted responders increased to 42% compared to 23% response rate in all patients of the validation cohorts.
doi_str_mv 10.1371/journal.pone.0230313
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_plos_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_plos_journals_2380031425</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A618077679</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_d08aac59ca754bcebaee378a98f24cf3</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A618077679</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-3944cc12ff54d1e2f1a9a747616088d854fa9242d3088a359e81506a2cd429703</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNk9tq3DAQhk1padK0b1BaQ6G0F97q5NNNYQk9LAQCPd2KsTz2auuVtpIckrevsuuEdclF8YXs0Tf_eH5pkuQlJQvKS_phY0dnYFjsrMEFYZxwyh8lp7TmLCsY4Y-P3k-SZ95vCMl5VRRPkxPOaF3kjJ4mm2XKsx4Npo22W3C_0aVe9wbC6DANNt05bLUKqUMfK_l9LMA1GMwa8NimBi20m_EKTEjVGrc2rNHB7ibVJm0cgo9hMArd8-RJB4PHF9N6lvz8_OnH-dfs4vLL6nx5kamiZiHjtRBKUdZ1uWgpso5CDaUoC1qQqmqrXHRQM8FaHj-B5zVWNCcFMNUKVpeEnyWvD7q7wXo52eQl4xWJHgmWR2J1IFoLG7lzOjZ-Iy1ouQ9Y10twQasBZUsqAJXXCspcNAobQORlBXXVMaE6HrU-TtXGZoutQhMcDDPR-Y7Ra9nbK1mSinPOosC7ScDZPyP6ILfaKxyGaLEd9_9NCxaPS0T0zT_ow91NVA-xAW06G-uqW1G5LGhFyrIo60gtHqDi0-JWq3inOh3js4T3s4TIBLwOPYzey9X3b__PXv6as2-P2DXCENbeDmPQ8brNQXEAlbPeO-zuTaZE3o7EnRvydiTkNBIx7dXxAd0n3c0A_wvdUwaZ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2380031425</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A 3-gene biomarker signature to predict response to taxane-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer</title><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Public Library of Science (PLoS) Journals Open Access</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry</source><creator>Kallarackal, Jim ; Burger, Florian ; Bianco, Stefano ; Romualdi, Alessandro ; Schad, Martina</creator><contributor>Vlahou, Antonia</contributor><creatorcontrib>Kallarackal, Jim ; Burger, Florian ; Bianco, Stefano ; Romualdi, Alessandro ; Schad, Martina ; Vlahou, Antonia</creatorcontrib><description>Breast cancer is the most common cancer in women worldwide, affecting one in eight women in their lifetime. Taxane-based chemotherapy is routinely used in the treatment of breast cancer. The purpose of this study was to develop and validate a predictive biomarker to improve the benefit/risk ratio for that cytotoxic chemotherapy. We explicitly strived for a biomarker that enables secure translation into clinical practice. We used genome-wide gene expression data of the Hatzis et al. discovery cohort of 310 patients for biomarker development and three independent cohorts with a total of 567 breast cancer patients for validation. We were able to develop a biomarker signature that consists of just the three gene products ELF5, SCUBE2 and NFIB, measured on RNA level. Compared to Hatzis et al., we achieved a significant improvement in predicting responders and non-responders in the Hatzis et al. validation cohort with an area under the receiver operating characteristics curve of 0.73 [95% CI, 69%-77%]. Moreover, we could confirm the performance of our biomarker on two further independent validation cohorts. The overall performance on all three validation cohorts expressed as area under the receiver operating characteristics curve was 0.75 [95% CI, 70%-80%]. At the clinically relevant classifier's operation point to optimize the exclusion of non-responders, the biomarker correctly predicts three out of four patients not responding to neoadjuvant taxane-based chemotherapy, independent of the breast cancer subtype. At the same time, the response rate in the group of predicted responders increased to 42% compared to 23% response rate in all patients of the validation cohorts.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0230313</identifier><identifier>PMID: 32196521</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Public Library of Science</publisher><subject>Adjuvant chemotherapy ; Biochemistry ; Biology and Life Sciences ; Biomarkers ; Breast cancer ; Cancer genetics ; Cancer therapies ; Cancer treatment ; Chemotherapy ; Computer and Information Sciences ; Cytotoxicity ; Diagnostic tests ; Experiments ; Gene expression ; Genes ; Genetic research ; Genomes ; Genomics ; Ixabepilone ; Medical diagnosis ; Medical prognosis ; Medical research ; Medicine and Health Sciences ; Patients ; Precision medicine ; Response rates ; Ribonucleic acid ; RNA ; Taxanes ; Time</subject><ispartof>PloS one, 2020-03, Vol.15 (3), p.e0230313-e0230313</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2020 Public Library of Science</rights><rights>2020 Kallarackal et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>2020 Kallarackal et al 2020 Kallarackal et al</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-3944cc12ff54d1e2f1a9a747616088d854fa9242d3088a359e81506a2cd429703</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-3944cc12ff54d1e2f1a9a747616088d854fa9242d3088a359e81506a2cd429703</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-4949-0800 ; 0000-0002-1747-0493</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7083332/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7083332/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,864,885,2102,2928,23866,27924,27925,53791,53793,79600,79601</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32196521$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Vlahou, Antonia</contributor><creatorcontrib>Kallarackal, Jim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Burger, Florian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bianco, Stefano</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Romualdi, Alessandro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schad, Martina</creatorcontrib><title>A 3-gene biomarker signature to predict response to taxane-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer</title><title>PloS one</title><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><description>Breast cancer is the most common cancer in women worldwide, affecting one in eight women in their lifetime. Taxane-based chemotherapy is routinely used in the treatment of breast cancer. The purpose of this study was to develop and validate a predictive biomarker to improve the benefit/risk ratio for that cytotoxic chemotherapy. We explicitly strived for a biomarker that enables secure translation into clinical practice. We used genome-wide gene expression data of the Hatzis et al. discovery cohort of 310 patients for biomarker development and three independent cohorts with a total of 567 breast cancer patients for validation. We were able to develop a biomarker signature that consists of just the three gene products ELF5, SCUBE2 and NFIB, measured on RNA level. Compared to Hatzis et al., we achieved a significant improvement in predicting responders and non-responders in the Hatzis et al. validation cohort with an area under the receiver operating characteristics curve of 0.73 [95% CI, 69%-77%]. Moreover, we could confirm the performance of our biomarker on two further independent validation cohorts. The overall performance on all three validation cohorts expressed as area under the receiver operating characteristics curve was 0.75 [95% CI, 70%-80%]. At the clinically relevant classifier's operation point to optimize the exclusion of non-responders, the biomarker correctly predicts three out of four patients not responding to neoadjuvant taxane-based chemotherapy, independent of the breast cancer subtype. At the same time, the response rate in the group of predicted responders increased to 42% compared to 23% response rate in all patients of the validation cohorts.</description><subject>Adjuvant chemotherapy</subject><subject>Biochemistry</subject><subject>Biology and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Biomarkers</subject><subject>Breast cancer</subject><subject>Cancer genetics</subject><subject>Cancer therapies</subject><subject>Cancer treatment</subject><subject>Chemotherapy</subject><subject>Computer and Information Sciences</subject><subject>Cytotoxicity</subject><subject>Diagnostic tests</subject><subject>Experiments</subject><subject>Gene expression</subject><subject>Genes</subject><subject>Genetic research</subject><subject>Genomes</subject><subject>Genomics</subject><subject>Ixabepilone</subject><subject>Medical diagnosis</subject><subject>Medical prognosis</subject><subject>Medical research</subject><subject>Medicine and Health Sciences</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Precision medicine</subject><subject>Response rates</subject><subject>Ribonucleic acid</subject><subject>RNA</subject><subject>Taxanes</subject><subject>Time</subject><issn>1932-6203</issn><issn>1932-6203</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNqNk9tq3DAQhk1padK0b1BaQ6G0F97q5NNNYQk9LAQCPd2KsTz2auuVtpIckrevsuuEdclF8YXs0Tf_eH5pkuQlJQvKS_phY0dnYFjsrMEFYZxwyh8lp7TmLCsY4Y-P3k-SZ95vCMl5VRRPkxPOaF3kjJ4mm2XKsx4Npo22W3C_0aVe9wbC6DANNt05bLUKqUMfK_l9LMA1GMwa8NimBi20m_EKTEjVGrc2rNHB7ibVJm0cgo9hMArd8-RJB4PHF9N6lvz8_OnH-dfs4vLL6nx5kamiZiHjtRBKUdZ1uWgpso5CDaUoC1qQqmqrXHRQM8FaHj-B5zVWNCcFMNUKVpeEnyWvD7q7wXo52eQl4xWJHgmWR2J1IFoLG7lzOjZ-Iy1ouQ9Y10twQasBZUsqAJXXCspcNAobQORlBXXVMaE6HrU-TtXGZoutQhMcDDPR-Y7Ra9nbK1mSinPOosC7ScDZPyP6ILfaKxyGaLEd9_9NCxaPS0T0zT_ow91NVA-xAW06G-uqW1G5LGhFyrIo60gtHqDi0-JWq3inOh3js4T3s4TIBLwOPYzey9X3b__PXv6as2-P2DXCENbeDmPQ8brNQXEAlbPeO-zuTaZE3o7EnRvydiTkNBIx7dXxAd0n3c0A_wvdUwaZ</recordid><startdate>20200320</startdate><enddate>20200320</enddate><creator>Kallarackal, Jim</creator><creator>Burger, Florian</creator><creator>Bianco, Stefano</creator><creator>Romualdi, Alessandro</creator><creator>Schad, Martina</creator><general>Public Library of Science</general><general>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>IOV</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4949-0800</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1747-0493</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20200320</creationdate><title>A 3-gene biomarker signature to predict response to taxane-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer</title><author>Kallarackal, Jim ; Burger, Florian ; Bianco, Stefano ; Romualdi, Alessandro ; Schad, Martina</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-3944cc12ff54d1e2f1a9a747616088d854fa9242d3088a359e81506a2cd429703</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Adjuvant chemotherapy</topic><topic>Biochemistry</topic><topic>Biology and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Biomarkers</topic><topic>Breast cancer</topic><topic>Cancer genetics</topic><topic>Cancer therapies</topic><topic>Cancer treatment</topic><topic>Chemotherapy</topic><topic>Computer and Information Sciences</topic><topic>Cytotoxicity</topic><topic>Diagnostic tests</topic><topic>Experiments</topic><topic>Gene expression</topic><topic>Genes</topic><topic>Genetic research</topic><topic>Genomes</topic><topic>Genomics</topic><topic>Ixabepilone</topic><topic>Medical diagnosis</topic><topic>Medical prognosis</topic><topic>Medical research</topic><topic>Medicine and Health Sciences</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Precision medicine</topic><topic>Response rates</topic><topic>Ribonucleic acid</topic><topic>RNA</topic><topic>Taxanes</topic><topic>Time</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kallarackal, Jim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Burger, Florian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bianco, Stefano</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Romualdi, Alessandro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schad, Martina</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Opposing Viewpoints</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Materials Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>Access via ProQuest (Open Access)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kallarackal, Jim</au><au>Burger, Florian</au><au>Bianco, Stefano</au><au>Romualdi, Alessandro</au><au>Schad, Martina</au><au>Vlahou, Antonia</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A 3-gene biomarker signature to predict response to taxane-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer</atitle><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><date>2020-03-20</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>15</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>e0230313</spage><epage>e0230313</epage><pages>e0230313-e0230313</pages><issn>1932-6203</issn><eissn>1932-6203</eissn><abstract>Breast cancer is the most common cancer in women worldwide, affecting one in eight women in their lifetime. Taxane-based chemotherapy is routinely used in the treatment of breast cancer. The purpose of this study was to develop and validate a predictive biomarker to improve the benefit/risk ratio for that cytotoxic chemotherapy. We explicitly strived for a biomarker that enables secure translation into clinical practice. We used genome-wide gene expression data of the Hatzis et al. discovery cohort of 310 patients for biomarker development and three independent cohorts with a total of 567 breast cancer patients for validation. We were able to develop a biomarker signature that consists of just the three gene products ELF5, SCUBE2 and NFIB, measured on RNA level. Compared to Hatzis et al., we achieved a significant improvement in predicting responders and non-responders in the Hatzis et al. validation cohort with an area under the receiver operating characteristics curve of 0.73 [95% CI, 69%-77%]. Moreover, we could confirm the performance of our biomarker on two further independent validation cohorts. The overall performance on all three validation cohorts expressed as area under the receiver operating characteristics curve was 0.75 [95% CI, 70%-80%]. At the clinically relevant classifier's operation point to optimize the exclusion of non-responders, the biomarker correctly predicts three out of four patients not responding to neoadjuvant taxane-based chemotherapy, independent of the breast cancer subtype. At the same time, the response rate in the group of predicted responders increased to 42% compared to 23% response rate in all patients of the validation cohorts.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Public Library of Science</pub><pmid>32196521</pmid><doi>10.1371/journal.pone.0230313</doi><tpages>e0230313</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4949-0800</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1747-0493</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1932-6203
ispartof PloS one, 2020-03, Vol.15 (3), p.e0230313-e0230313
issn 1932-6203
1932-6203
language eng
recordid cdi_plos_journals_2380031425
source DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Public Library of Science (PLoS) Journals Open Access; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central; Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry
subjects Adjuvant chemotherapy
Biochemistry
Biology and Life Sciences
Biomarkers
Breast cancer
Cancer genetics
Cancer therapies
Cancer treatment
Chemotherapy
Computer and Information Sciences
Cytotoxicity
Diagnostic tests
Experiments
Gene expression
Genes
Genetic research
Genomes
Genomics
Ixabepilone
Medical diagnosis
Medical prognosis
Medical research
Medicine and Health Sciences
Patients
Precision medicine
Response rates
Ribonucleic acid
RNA
Taxanes
Time
title A 3-gene biomarker signature to predict response to taxane-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-30T23%3A18%3A53IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_plos_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%203-gene%20biomarker%20signature%20to%20predict%20response%20to%20taxane-based%20neoadjuvant%20chemotherapy%20in%20breast%20cancer&rft.jtitle=PloS%20one&rft.au=Kallarackal,%20Jim&rft.date=2020-03-20&rft.volume=15&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=e0230313&rft.epage=e0230313&rft.pages=e0230313-e0230313&rft.issn=1932-6203&rft.eissn=1932-6203&rft_id=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0230313&rft_dat=%3Cgale_plos_%3EA618077679%3C/gale_plos_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2380031425&rft_id=info:pmid/32196521&rft_galeid=A618077679&rft_doaj_id=oai_doaj_org_article_d08aac59ca754bcebaee378a98f24cf3&rfr_iscdi=true