The 20-year impact of tobacco price and tobacco control expenditure increases in Minnesota, 1998-2017

Tobacco control programs and policies reduce tobacco use and prevent health and economic harms. The majority of tobacco control programs and policies in the United States are implemented at local and state levels. Yet the literature on state-level initiatives reports a limited set of outcomes. To fa...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:PloS one 2020-03, Vol.15 (3), p.e0230364-e0230364
Hauptverfasser: Maciosek, Michael V, LaFrance, Amy B, St Claire, Ann W, Keller, Paula A, Xu, Zack, Schillo, Barbara A
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page e0230364
container_issue 3
container_start_page e0230364
container_title PloS one
container_volume 15
creator Maciosek, Michael V
LaFrance, Amy B
St Claire, Ann W
Keller, Paula A
Xu, Zack
Schillo, Barbara A
description Tobacco control programs and policies reduce tobacco use and prevent health and economic harms. The majority of tobacco control programs and policies in the United States are implemented at local and state levels. Yet the literature on state-level initiatives reports a limited set of outcomes. To facilitate decision-making that is increasingly focused on costs, we provide estimates of a broader set of measures of the impact of tobacco control policy, including smoking prevalence, disease events, deaths, medical costs, productivity and tobacco tax revenues, using the experience of Minnesota as an example. Using the HealthPartners Institute's ModelHealth™: Tobacco MN microsimulation, we assessed the impact of the stream of tobacco control expenditures and cigarette price increases from 1998 to 2017. We simulated 1.3 million individuals representative of the Minnesota population. The simulation estimated that increased expenditures on tobacco control above 1997 levels prevented 38,400 cancer, cardiovascular, diabetes and respiratory disease events and 4,100 deaths over 20 years. Increased prices prevented 14,600 additional events and 1,700 additional deaths. Both the net increase in tax revenues and the reduction in medical costs were greater than the additional investments in tobacco control. Combined, the policies address both short-term and long-term goals to reduce the harms of tobacco by helping adults who wish to quit smoking and deterring youth from starting to smoke. States can pay for initial investments in tobacco control through tax increases and recoup those investments through reduced expenditures on medical care.
doi_str_mv 10.1371/journal.pone.0230364
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_plos_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_plos_journals_2378835410</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A617897148</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_4e45234822754f3ebd2d0b8a334ce839</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A617897148</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-527d5658c3d16c49d0fa595f52ace3b07fadec8f2bcd5cf473fe5ac49b4d94d23</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNk21rFDEQxxdRbK1-A9EFQRTcM4-b7BuhFB8OKgWtvg3ZZPYuZW9zTXal_fZme9vjVvpC8iJh8pv_ZGYyWfYSowWmAn-88kPodLvY-g4WiFBES_YoO8YVJUVJEH18cD7KnsV4hRCnsiyfZkeUYCkI4ccZXK4hJ6i4BR1yt9lq0-e-yXtfa2N8vg3OQK47u7cY3_XBtzncbKGzrh8C5K4zAXSEmE75d9d1EH2vP-S4qmRBEBbPsyeNbiO8mPaT7NeXz5dn34rzi6_Ls9PzwpQV6QtOhOUll4ZaXBpWWdRoXvGGE22A1kg02oKRDamN5aZhgjbAdQJrZitmCT3JXu90t62PaqpQVIQKKSlnGCViuSOs11cqpbfR4VZ57dSdwYeV0qF3pgXFgHFCmSREcNZQqC2xqJaaUmZA0ippfZqiDfUGrIFUGd3OROc3nVurlf-jBJKICJkE3k0CwV8PEHu1cdFA2-oO_HD37gphyfgY680_6MPZTdRKpwRc1_gU14yi6rTEQlYCszHs4gEqLQsbl_oLjUv2mcP7mcP4B-CmX-khRrX8-eP_2Yvfc_btAbsG3fbr6Nuhd76Lc5DtQBN8jAGafZExUuM03FdDjdOgpmlIbq8OG7R3uv_-9C8PbQNK</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2378835410</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The 20-year impact of tobacco price and tobacco control expenditure increases in Minnesota, 1998-2017</title><source>Public Library of Science (PLoS) Journals Open Access</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry</source><creator>Maciosek, Michael V ; LaFrance, Amy B ; St Claire, Ann W ; Keller, Paula A ; Xu, Zack ; Schillo, Barbara A</creator><creatorcontrib>Maciosek, Michael V ; LaFrance, Amy B ; St Claire, Ann W ; Keller, Paula A ; Xu, Zack ; Schillo, Barbara A</creatorcontrib><description>Tobacco control programs and policies reduce tobacco use and prevent health and economic harms. The majority of tobacco control programs and policies in the United States are implemented at local and state levels. Yet the literature on state-level initiatives reports a limited set of outcomes. To facilitate decision-making that is increasingly focused on costs, we provide estimates of a broader set of measures of the impact of tobacco control policy, including smoking prevalence, disease events, deaths, medical costs, productivity and tobacco tax revenues, using the experience of Minnesota as an example. Using the HealthPartners Institute's ModelHealth™: Tobacco MN microsimulation, we assessed the impact of the stream of tobacco control expenditures and cigarette price increases from 1998 to 2017. We simulated 1.3 million individuals representative of the Minnesota population. The simulation estimated that increased expenditures on tobacco control above 1997 levels prevented 38,400 cancer, cardiovascular, diabetes and respiratory disease events and 4,100 deaths over 20 years. Increased prices prevented 14,600 additional events and 1,700 additional deaths. Both the net increase in tax revenues and the reduction in medical costs were greater than the additional investments in tobacco control. Combined, the policies address both short-term and long-term goals to reduce the harms of tobacco by helping adults who wish to quit smoking and deterring youth from starting to smoke. States can pay for initial investments in tobacco control through tax increases and recoup those investments through reduced expenditures on medical care.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0230364</identifier><identifier>PMID: 32187225</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Public Library of Science</publisher><subject>Age ; Air cleanliness ; Biology and Life Sciences ; Cancer prevention ; Cigarettes ; Computer simulation ; Control programs ; Costs ; Decision making ; Diabetes mellitus ; Disease ; Diseases ; Estimates ; Ethnicity ; Excise taxes ; Expenditures ; Fatalities ; Health care costs ; Health care expenditures ; Investments ; Levels ; Lung diseases ; Medical economics ; Medicine and Health Sciences ; Mortality ; People and places ; Policies ; Prevention ; Production management ; Respiratory diseases ; Respiratory tract diseases ; Revenue ; Simulation ; Smoke ; Smoking ; Smoking cessation ; Social Sciences ; Tobacco ; Youth ; Youth smoking</subject><ispartof>PloS one, 2020-03, Vol.15 (3), p.e0230364-e0230364</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2020 Public Library of Science</rights><rights>2020 Maciosek et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>2020 Maciosek et al 2020 Maciosek et al</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-527d5658c3d16c49d0fa595f52ace3b07fadec8f2bcd5cf473fe5ac49b4d94d23</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-527d5658c3d16c49d0fa595f52ace3b07fadec8f2bcd5cf473fe5ac49b4d94d23</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-8164-8858</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7080278/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7080278/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,860,881,2096,2915,23845,27901,27902,53766,53768,79342,79343</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32187225$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Maciosek, Michael V</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>LaFrance, Amy B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>St Claire, Ann W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Keller, Paula A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xu, Zack</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schillo, Barbara A</creatorcontrib><title>The 20-year impact of tobacco price and tobacco control expenditure increases in Minnesota, 1998-2017</title><title>PloS one</title><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><description>Tobacco control programs and policies reduce tobacco use and prevent health and economic harms. The majority of tobacco control programs and policies in the United States are implemented at local and state levels. Yet the literature on state-level initiatives reports a limited set of outcomes. To facilitate decision-making that is increasingly focused on costs, we provide estimates of a broader set of measures of the impact of tobacco control policy, including smoking prevalence, disease events, deaths, medical costs, productivity and tobacco tax revenues, using the experience of Minnesota as an example. Using the HealthPartners Institute's ModelHealth™: Tobacco MN microsimulation, we assessed the impact of the stream of tobacco control expenditures and cigarette price increases from 1998 to 2017. We simulated 1.3 million individuals representative of the Minnesota population. The simulation estimated that increased expenditures on tobacco control above 1997 levels prevented 38,400 cancer, cardiovascular, diabetes and respiratory disease events and 4,100 deaths over 20 years. Increased prices prevented 14,600 additional events and 1,700 additional deaths. Both the net increase in tax revenues and the reduction in medical costs were greater than the additional investments in tobacco control. Combined, the policies address both short-term and long-term goals to reduce the harms of tobacco by helping adults who wish to quit smoking and deterring youth from starting to smoke. States can pay for initial investments in tobacco control through tax increases and recoup those investments through reduced expenditures on medical care.</description><subject>Age</subject><subject>Air cleanliness</subject><subject>Biology and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Cancer prevention</subject><subject>Cigarettes</subject><subject>Computer simulation</subject><subject>Control programs</subject><subject>Costs</subject><subject>Decision making</subject><subject>Diabetes mellitus</subject><subject>Disease</subject><subject>Diseases</subject><subject>Estimates</subject><subject>Ethnicity</subject><subject>Excise taxes</subject><subject>Expenditures</subject><subject>Fatalities</subject><subject>Health care costs</subject><subject>Health care expenditures</subject><subject>Investments</subject><subject>Levels</subject><subject>Lung diseases</subject><subject>Medical economics</subject><subject>Medicine and Health Sciences</subject><subject>Mortality</subject><subject>People and places</subject><subject>Policies</subject><subject>Prevention</subject><subject>Production management</subject><subject>Respiratory diseases</subject><subject>Respiratory tract diseases</subject><subject>Revenue</subject><subject>Simulation</subject><subject>Smoke</subject><subject>Smoking</subject><subject>Smoking cessation</subject><subject>Social Sciences</subject><subject>Tobacco</subject><subject>Youth</subject><subject>Youth smoking</subject><issn>1932-6203</issn><issn>1932-6203</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNqNk21rFDEQxxdRbK1-A9EFQRTcM4-b7BuhFB8OKgWtvg3ZZPYuZW9zTXal_fZme9vjVvpC8iJh8pv_ZGYyWfYSowWmAn-88kPodLvY-g4WiFBES_YoO8YVJUVJEH18cD7KnsV4hRCnsiyfZkeUYCkI4ccZXK4hJ6i4BR1yt9lq0-e-yXtfa2N8vg3OQK47u7cY3_XBtzncbKGzrh8C5K4zAXSEmE75d9d1EH2vP-S4qmRBEBbPsyeNbiO8mPaT7NeXz5dn34rzi6_Ls9PzwpQV6QtOhOUll4ZaXBpWWdRoXvGGE22A1kg02oKRDamN5aZhgjbAdQJrZitmCT3JXu90t62PaqpQVIQKKSlnGCViuSOs11cqpbfR4VZ57dSdwYeV0qF3pgXFgHFCmSREcNZQqC2xqJaaUmZA0ippfZqiDfUGrIFUGd3OROc3nVurlf-jBJKICJkE3k0CwV8PEHu1cdFA2-oO_HD37gphyfgY680_6MPZTdRKpwRc1_gU14yi6rTEQlYCszHs4gEqLQsbl_oLjUv2mcP7mcP4B-CmX-khRrX8-eP_2Yvfc_btAbsG3fbr6Nuhd76Lc5DtQBN8jAGafZExUuM03FdDjdOgpmlIbq8OG7R3uv_-9C8PbQNK</recordid><startdate>20200318</startdate><enddate>20200318</enddate><creator>Maciosek, Michael V</creator><creator>LaFrance, Amy B</creator><creator>St Claire, Ann W</creator><creator>Keller, Paula A</creator><creator>Xu, Zack</creator><creator>Schillo, Barbara A</creator><general>Public Library of Science</general><general>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>IOV</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8164-8858</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20200318</creationdate><title>The 20-year impact of tobacco price and tobacco control expenditure increases in Minnesota, 1998-2017</title><author>Maciosek, Michael V ; LaFrance, Amy B ; St Claire, Ann W ; Keller, Paula A ; Xu, Zack ; Schillo, Barbara A</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-527d5658c3d16c49d0fa595f52ace3b07fadec8f2bcd5cf473fe5ac49b4d94d23</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Age</topic><topic>Air cleanliness</topic><topic>Biology and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Cancer prevention</topic><topic>Cigarettes</topic><topic>Computer simulation</topic><topic>Control programs</topic><topic>Costs</topic><topic>Decision making</topic><topic>Diabetes mellitus</topic><topic>Disease</topic><topic>Diseases</topic><topic>Estimates</topic><topic>Ethnicity</topic><topic>Excise taxes</topic><topic>Expenditures</topic><topic>Fatalities</topic><topic>Health care costs</topic><topic>Health care expenditures</topic><topic>Investments</topic><topic>Levels</topic><topic>Lung diseases</topic><topic>Medical economics</topic><topic>Medicine and Health Sciences</topic><topic>Mortality</topic><topic>People and places</topic><topic>Policies</topic><topic>Prevention</topic><topic>Production management</topic><topic>Respiratory diseases</topic><topic>Respiratory tract diseases</topic><topic>Revenue</topic><topic>Simulation</topic><topic>Smoke</topic><topic>Smoking</topic><topic>Smoking cessation</topic><topic>Social Sciences</topic><topic>Tobacco</topic><topic>Youth</topic><topic>Youth smoking</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Maciosek, Michael V</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>LaFrance, Amy B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>St Claire, Ann W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Keller, Paula A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xu, Zack</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schillo, Barbara A</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Opposing Viewpoints</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Materials Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Maciosek, Michael V</au><au>LaFrance, Amy B</au><au>St Claire, Ann W</au><au>Keller, Paula A</au><au>Xu, Zack</au><au>Schillo, Barbara A</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The 20-year impact of tobacco price and tobacco control expenditure increases in Minnesota, 1998-2017</atitle><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><date>2020-03-18</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>15</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>e0230364</spage><epage>e0230364</epage><pages>e0230364-e0230364</pages><issn>1932-6203</issn><eissn>1932-6203</eissn><abstract>Tobacco control programs and policies reduce tobacco use and prevent health and economic harms. The majority of tobacco control programs and policies in the United States are implemented at local and state levels. Yet the literature on state-level initiatives reports a limited set of outcomes. To facilitate decision-making that is increasingly focused on costs, we provide estimates of a broader set of measures of the impact of tobacco control policy, including smoking prevalence, disease events, deaths, medical costs, productivity and tobacco tax revenues, using the experience of Minnesota as an example. Using the HealthPartners Institute's ModelHealth™: Tobacco MN microsimulation, we assessed the impact of the stream of tobacco control expenditures and cigarette price increases from 1998 to 2017. We simulated 1.3 million individuals representative of the Minnesota population. The simulation estimated that increased expenditures on tobacco control above 1997 levels prevented 38,400 cancer, cardiovascular, diabetes and respiratory disease events and 4,100 deaths over 20 years. Increased prices prevented 14,600 additional events and 1,700 additional deaths. Both the net increase in tax revenues and the reduction in medical costs were greater than the additional investments in tobacco control. Combined, the policies address both short-term and long-term goals to reduce the harms of tobacco by helping adults who wish to quit smoking and deterring youth from starting to smoke. States can pay for initial investments in tobacco control through tax increases and recoup those investments through reduced expenditures on medical care.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Public Library of Science</pub><pmid>32187225</pmid><doi>10.1371/journal.pone.0230364</doi><tpages>e0230364</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8164-8858</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1932-6203
ispartof PloS one, 2020-03, Vol.15 (3), p.e0230364-e0230364
issn 1932-6203
1932-6203
language eng
recordid cdi_plos_journals_2378835410
source Public Library of Science (PLoS) Journals Open Access; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central; Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry
subjects Age
Air cleanliness
Biology and Life Sciences
Cancer prevention
Cigarettes
Computer simulation
Control programs
Costs
Decision making
Diabetes mellitus
Disease
Diseases
Estimates
Ethnicity
Excise taxes
Expenditures
Fatalities
Health care costs
Health care expenditures
Investments
Levels
Lung diseases
Medical economics
Medicine and Health Sciences
Mortality
People and places
Policies
Prevention
Production management
Respiratory diseases
Respiratory tract diseases
Revenue
Simulation
Smoke
Smoking
Smoking cessation
Social Sciences
Tobacco
Youth
Youth smoking
title The 20-year impact of tobacco price and tobacco control expenditure increases in Minnesota, 1998-2017
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-07T06%3A01%3A48IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_plos_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%2020-year%20impact%20of%20tobacco%20price%20and%20tobacco%20control%20expenditure%20increases%20in%20Minnesota,%201998-2017&rft.jtitle=PloS%20one&rft.au=Maciosek,%20Michael%20V&rft.date=2020-03-18&rft.volume=15&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=e0230364&rft.epage=e0230364&rft.pages=e0230364-e0230364&rft.issn=1932-6203&rft.eissn=1932-6203&rft_id=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0230364&rft_dat=%3Cgale_plos_%3EA617897148%3C/gale_plos_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2378835410&rft_id=info:pmid/32187225&rft_galeid=A617897148&rft_doaj_id=oai_doaj_org_article_4e45234822754f3ebd2d0b8a334ce839&rfr_iscdi=true