Level of depression, anxiety and stress in patients with intrauterine adhesions in Hunan Province, China: A cross-sectional study
The incidence of intrauterine adhesions has been increasing in recent years, seriously affecting women's health. This study aimed to investigate the psychological status and identify risk factors associated with high psychological distress in patients with intrauterine adhesions. A cross-sectio...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | PloS one 2020-03, Vol.15 (3), p.e0229832-e0229832 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | e0229832 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 3 |
| container_start_page | e0229832 |
| container_title | PloS one |
| container_volume | 15 |
| creator | Wang, Ting Zhou, Yanhui Fu, Jingxia Chen, Mingzhu Luo, Yang |
| description | The incidence of intrauterine adhesions has been increasing in recent years, seriously affecting women's health. This study aimed to investigate the psychological status and identify risk factors associated with high psychological distress in patients with intrauterine adhesions.
A cross-sectional study was conducted in Hunan Province, China. A total of 258 patients who presented with intrauterine adhesions between February and May 2018 were included. Data were collected by a questionnaire packet that included the Depression Anxiety Stress Scale, the Medical Coping Mode Questionnaire, and demographic and clinical information. Descriptive statistics, t-tests, one-way ANOVA, Pearson's correlations and multiple linear stepwise regression were employed in this study.
Among 258 participants, the detection rates of mild depression and moderate to extremely severe depression were 10.1% and 10.5%, respectively; the detection rates of mild anxiety and moderate to extremely severe anxiety were 11.2% and 20.2%, respectively; the detection rates of mild stress and moderate to extremely severe stress were 9.3% and 10.2%, respectively. Avoidance and resignation coping were positively correlated with the overall scores of general distress which represents the total scores of the Depression Anxiety Stress Scale (r = 0.171, 0.475, P < 0.01). Multiple linear stepwise regression results showed that husband-wife relationships and avoidance and resignation coping strategies were the main factors predicting general distress levels.
Patients with intrauterine adhesions have psychological distress in a certain extent. Target interventions should be taken to improve the mental health level of patients. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1371/journal.pone.0229832 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_plos_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_plos_journals_2376205803</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A617101170</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_0e7fac0caaf84c3fb97377faa7575833</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A617101170</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-f1de56e0f98b2cb19959a91655f8c6401895fe50cf4349479ce47780ad9e1aa13</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNk0-P0zAQxSMEYpfCN0AQCQmBtC12nMQxB6SqArZSpUX8u1pTZ9y6Su0SO8v2yDfHaburFu0B5eDo5fee4_FMkjynZEQZp-9WrmstNKONszgiWSYqlj1Izqlg2bDMCHt49H6WPPF-RUjBqrJ8nJyxjJbRws-TPzO8xiZ1Oq1x06L3xtmLFOyNwbCNa5360MupsekGgkEbfPrbhGUUQgtdwNZYTKFeYm_dcZedBZt-ad21sQov0snSWHifjlPVOu-HHlWIKDQxuqu3T5NHGhqPzw7rIPnx6eP3yeVwdvV5OhnPhqoUWRhqWmNRItGimmdqToUoBAhaFoWuVJkTWolCY0GUzlkuci4U5pxXBGqBFICyQfJyn7tpnJeH6nmZMR4rVFSERWK6J2oHK7lpzRrarXRg5E5w7UJCG4xqUBLkGhRRALrKFdNzwRmPEvCCFxXrsz4cduvma6wV9tVqTkJPv1izlAt3LTkpCy6yGPDmENC6Xx36INfGK2wasOi6_X9zRkW840Hy6h_0_tMdqAXEAxirXdxX9aFyXFJOCaWcRGp0DxWfGtdGxVbTJuonhrcnhsgEvAkL6LyX029f_5-9-nnKvj5ilwhNWHrXdH3r-FMw34O77mpR3xWZEtlPym01ZD8p8jAp0fbi-ILuTLejwf4CJBcO8A</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2376205803</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Level of depression, anxiety and stress in patients with intrauterine adhesions in Hunan Province, China: A cross-sectional study</title><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Free E-Journal (出版社公開部分のみ）</source><source>PLoS - Public Library of Sciencem (Open Access)</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry</source><creator>Wang, Ting ; Zhou, Yanhui ; Fu, Jingxia ; Chen, Mingzhu ; Luo, Yang</creator><creatorcontrib>Wang, Ting ; Zhou, Yanhui ; Fu, Jingxia ; Chen, Mingzhu ; Luo, Yang</creatorcontrib><description>The incidence of intrauterine adhesions has been increasing in recent years, seriously affecting women's health. This study aimed to investigate the psychological status and identify risk factors associated with high psychological distress in patients with intrauterine adhesions.
A cross-sectional study was conducted in Hunan Province, China. A total of 258 patients who presented with intrauterine adhesions between February and May 2018 were included. Data were collected by a questionnaire packet that included the Depression Anxiety Stress Scale, the Medical Coping Mode Questionnaire, and demographic and clinical information. Descriptive statistics, t-tests, one-way ANOVA, Pearson's correlations and multiple linear stepwise regression were employed in this study.
Among 258 participants, the detection rates of mild depression and moderate to extremely severe depression were 10.1% and 10.5%, respectively; the detection rates of mild anxiety and moderate to extremely severe anxiety were 11.2% and 20.2%, respectively; the detection rates of mild stress and moderate to extremely severe stress were 9.3% and 10.2%, respectively. Avoidance and resignation coping were positively correlated with the overall scores of general distress which represents the total scores of the Depression Anxiety Stress Scale (r = 0.171, 0.475, P < 0.01). Multiple linear stepwise regression results showed that husband-wife relationships and avoidance and resignation coping strategies were the main factors predicting general distress levels.
Patients with intrauterine adhesions have psychological distress in a certain extent. Target interventions should be taken to improve the mental health level of patients.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0229832</identifier><identifier>PMID: 32160227</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Public Library of Science</publisher><subject>Adhesions ; Anxiety ; Avoidance ; Biology and Life Sciences ; Care and treatment ; Cross-sectional studies ; Emotions ; Fertility ; Gynecology ; Health ; Infertility ; Medical research ; Medicine and Health Sciences ; Mental depression ; Mental health ; Nursing schools ; Obstetrics ; Patients ; Quantitative psychology ; Questionnaires ; Risk analysis ; Risk factors ; Social Sciences ; Sociodemographics ; Statistical tests ; Stress ; Stress (Psychology) ; Variance analysis ; Women ; Women's health</subject><ispartof>PloS one, 2020-03, Vol.15 (3), p.e0229832-e0229832</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2020 Public Library of Science</rights><rights>2020 Wang et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>2020 Wang et al 2020 Wang et al</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-f1de56e0f98b2cb19959a91655f8c6401895fe50cf4349479ce47780ad9e1aa13</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-f1de56e0f98b2cb19959a91655f8c6401895fe50cf4349479ce47780ad9e1aa13</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-0706-6323</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7065792/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7065792/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,860,881,2096,2915,23845,27901,27902,53766,53768,79343,79344</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32160227$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Wang, Ting</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhou, Yanhui</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fu, Jingxia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, Mingzhu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Luo, Yang</creatorcontrib><title>Level of depression, anxiety and stress in patients with intrauterine adhesions in Hunan Province, China: A cross-sectional study</title><title>PloS one</title><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><description>The incidence of intrauterine adhesions has been increasing in recent years, seriously affecting women's health. This study aimed to investigate the psychological status and identify risk factors associated with high psychological distress in patients with intrauterine adhesions.
A cross-sectional study was conducted in Hunan Province, China. A total of 258 patients who presented with intrauterine adhesions between February and May 2018 were included. Data were collected by a questionnaire packet that included the Depression Anxiety Stress Scale, the Medical Coping Mode Questionnaire, and demographic and clinical information. Descriptive statistics, t-tests, one-way ANOVA, Pearson's correlations and multiple linear stepwise regression were employed in this study.
Among 258 participants, the detection rates of mild depression and moderate to extremely severe depression were 10.1% and 10.5%, respectively; the detection rates of mild anxiety and moderate to extremely severe anxiety were 11.2% and 20.2%, respectively; the detection rates of mild stress and moderate to extremely severe stress were 9.3% and 10.2%, respectively. Avoidance and resignation coping were positively correlated with the overall scores of general distress which represents the total scores of the Depression Anxiety Stress Scale (r = 0.171, 0.475, P < 0.01). Multiple linear stepwise regression results showed that husband-wife relationships and avoidance and resignation coping strategies were the main factors predicting general distress levels.
Patients with intrauterine adhesions have psychological distress in a certain extent. Target interventions should be taken to improve the mental health level of patients.</description><subject>Adhesions</subject><subject>Anxiety</subject><subject>Avoidance</subject><subject>Biology and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Care and treatment</subject><subject>Cross-sectional studies</subject><subject>Emotions</subject><subject>Fertility</subject><subject>Gynecology</subject><subject>Health</subject><subject>Infertility</subject><subject>Medical research</subject><subject>Medicine and Health Sciences</subject><subject>Mental depression</subject><subject>Mental health</subject><subject>Nursing schools</subject><subject>Obstetrics</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Quantitative psychology</subject><subject>Questionnaires</subject><subject>Risk analysis</subject><subject>Risk factors</subject><subject>Social Sciences</subject><subject>Sociodemographics</subject><subject>Statistical tests</subject><subject>Stress</subject><subject>Stress (Psychology)</subject><subject>Variance analysis</subject><subject>Women</subject><subject>Women's health</subject><issn>1932-6203</issn><issn>1932-6203</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNqNk0-P0zAQxSMEYpfCN0AQCQmBtC12nMQxB6SqArZSpUX8u1pTZ9y6Su0SO8v2yDfHaburFu0B5eDo5fee4_FMkjynZEQZp-9WrmstNKONszgiWSYqlj1Izqlg2bDMCHt49H6WPPF-RUjBqrJ8nJyxjJbRws-TPzO8xiZ1Oq1x06L3xtmLFOyNwbCNa5360MupsekGgkEbfPrbhGUUQgtdwNZYTKFeYm_dcZedBZt-ad21sQov0snSWHifjlPVOu-HHlWIKDQxuqu3T5NHGhqPzw7rIPnx6eP3yeVwdvV5OhnPhqoUWRhqWmNRItGimmdqToUoBAhaFoWuVJkTWolCY0GUzlkuci4U5pxXBGqBFICyQfJyn7tpnJeH6nmZMR4rVFSERWK6J2oHK7lpzRrarXRg5E5w7UJCG4xqUBLkGhRRALrKFdNzwRmPEvCCFxXrsz4cduvma6wV9tVqTkJPv1izlAt3LTkpCy6yGPDmENC6Xx36INfGK2wasOi6_X9zRkW840Hy6h_0_tMdqAXEAxirXdxX9aFyXFJOCaWcRGp0DxWfGtdGxVbTJuonhrcnhsgEvAkL6LyX029f_5-9-nnKvj5ilwhNWHrXdH3r-FMw34O77mpR3xWZEtlPym01ZD8p8jAp0fbi-ILuTLejwf4CJBcO8A</recordid><startdate>20200311</startdate><enddate>20200311</enddate><creator>Wang, Ting</creator><creator>Zhou, Yanhui</creator><creator>Fu, Jingxia</creator><creator>Chen, Mingzhu</creator><creator>Luo, Yang</creator><general>Public Library of Science</general><general>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>IOV</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0706-6323</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20200311</creationdate><title>Level of depression, anxiety and stress in patients with intrauterine adhesions in Hunan Province, China: A cross-sectional study</title><author>Wang, Ting ; Zhou, Yanhui ; Fu, Jingxia ; Chen, Mingzhu ; Luo, Yang</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-f1de56e0f98b2cb19959a91655f8c6401895fe50cf4349479ce47780ad9e1aa13</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Adhesions</topic><topic>Anxiety</topic><topic>Avoidance</topic><topic>Biology and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Care and treatment</topic><topic>Cross-sectional studies</topic><topic>Emotions</topic><topic>Fertility</topic><topic>Gynecology</topic><topic>Health</topic><topic>Infertility</topic><topic>Medical research</topic><topic>Medicine and Health Sciences</topic><topic>Mental depression</topic><topic>Mental health</topic><topic>Nursing schools</topic><topic>Obstetrics</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Quantitative psychology</topic><topic>Questionnaires</topic><topic>Risk analysis</topic><topic>Risk factors</topic><topic>Social Sciences</topic><topic>Sociodemographics</topic><topic>Statistical tests</topic><topic>Stress</topic><topic>Stress (Psychology)</topic><topic>Variance analysis</topic><topic>Women</topic><topic>Women's health</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Wang, Ting</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhou, Yanhui</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fu, Jingxia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, Mingzhu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Luo, Yang</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Opposing Viewpoints Resource Center</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Nursing and Allied Health Journals</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Proquest)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database (Proquest)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Materials Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Biological Sciences</collection><collection>Agriculture Science Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest advanced technologies & aerospace journals</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Wang, Ting</au><au>Zhou, Yanhui</au><au>Fu, Jingxia</au><au>Chen, Mingzhu</au><au>Luo, Yang</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Level of depression, anxiety and stress in patients with intrauterine adhesions in Hunan Province, China: A cross-sectional study</atitle><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><date>2020-03-11</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>15</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>e0229832</spage><epage>e0229832</epage><pages>e0229832-e0229832</pages><issn>1932-6203</issn><eissn>1932-6203</eissn><abstract>The incidence of intrauterine adhesions has been increasing in recent years, seriously affecting women's health. This study aimed to investigate the psychological status and identify risk factors associated with high psychological distress in patients with intrauterine adhesions.
A cross-sectional study was conducted in Hunan Province, China. A total of 258 patients who presented with intrauterine adhesions between February and May 2018 were included. Data were collected by a questionnaire packet that included the Depression Anxiety Stress Scale, the Medical Coping Mode Questionnaire, and demographic and clinical information. Descriptive statistics, t-tests, one-way ANOVA, Pearson's correlations and multiple linear stepwise regression were employed in this study.
Among 258 participants, the detection rates of mild depression and moderate to extremely severe depression were 10.1% and 10.5%, respectively; the detection rates of mild anxiety and moderate to extremely severe anxiety were 11.2% and 20.2%, respectively; the detection rates of mild stress and moderate to extremely severe stress were 9.3% and 10.2%, respectively. Avoidance and resignation coping were positively correlated with the overall scores of general distress which represents the total scores of the Depression Anxiety Stress Scale (r = 0.171, 0.475, P < 0.01). Multiple linear stepwise regression results showed that husband-wife relationships and avoidance and resignation coping strategies were the main factors predicting general distress levels.
Patients with intrauterine adhesions have psychological distress in a certain extent. Target interventions should be taken to improve the mental health level of patients.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Public Library of Science</pub><pmid>32160227</pmid><doi>10.1371/journal.pone.0229832</doi><tpages>e0229832</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0706-6323</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 1932-6203 |
| ispartof | PloS one, 2020-03, Vol.15 (3), p.e0229832-e0229832 |
| issn | 1932-6203 1932-6203 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_plos_journals_2376205803 |
| source | DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Free E-Journal (出版社公開部分のみ）; PLoS - Public Library of Sciencem (Open Access); PubMed Central; Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry |
| subjects | Adhesions Anxiety Avoidance Biology and Life Sciences Care and treatment Cross-sectional studies Emotions Fertility Gynecology Health Infertility Medical research Medicine and Health Sciences Mental depression Mental health Nursing schools Obstetrics Patients Quantitative psychology Questionnaires Risk analysis Risk factors Social Sciences Sociodemographics Statistical tests Stress Stress (Psychology) Variance analysis Women Women's health |
| title | Level of depression, anxiety and stress in patients with intrauterine adhesions in Hunan Province, China: A cross-sectional study |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-01T07%3A17%3A12IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_plos_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Level%20of%20depression,%20anxiety%20and%20stress%20in%20patients%20with%20intrauterine%20adhesions%20in%20Hunan%20Province,%20China:%20A%20cross-sectional%20study&rft.jtitle=PloS%20one&rft.au=Wang,%20Ting&rft.date=2020-03-11&rft.volume=15&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=e0229832&rft.epage=e0229832&rft.pages=e0229832-e0229832&rft.issn=1932-6203&rft.eissn=1932-6203&rft_id=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0229832&rft_dat=%3Cgale_plos_%3EA617101170%3C/gale_plos_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2376205803&rft_id=info:pmid/32160227&rft_galeid=A617101170&rft_doaj_id=oai_doaj_org_article_0e7fac0caaf84c3fb97377faa7575833&rfr_iscdi=true |