Important features of retail shoes for women with rheumatoid arthritis: A Delphi consensus survey
Footwear management aims to preserve foot function, reduce the burden of foot pain and maintain joint mobility in women with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Whilst retail footwear is commonly recommended by health professionals, there is no current consensus on recommended features of retail footwear for...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | PloS one 2019-12, Vol.14 (12), p.e0226906 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 12 |
| container_start_page | e0226906 |
| container_title | PloS one |
| container_volume | 14 |
| creator | Tehan, Peta Ellen Taylor, William J Carroll, Matthew Dalbeth, Nicola Rome, Keith |
| description | Footwear management aims to preserve foot function, reduce the burden of foot pain and maintain joint mobility in women with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Whilst retail footwear is commonly recommended by health professionals, there is no current consensus on recommended features of retail footwear for women with RA. This study aimed to determine consensus from health professionals about the important features of retail footwear for women with RA.
An international Delphi exercise using online survey software was conducted with 39 participants from health care backgrounds. Three iterative rounds were conducted. In the first round, participants listed features of retail footwear that would be important for women with RA. Responses of the first round, combined with results of a scoping review of patient-reported outcome measures used in assessing footwear in arthritis and a qualitative analysis of female patients' perspectives of retail footwear in RA were used to create items for the second round. Items were scored by a 9-point rating scale with consensus defined by the RAND/UCLA disagreement index. The third round consisted of items which did not reach consensus or scored >1 on the RAND/UCLA disagreement index from round two.
Fifty-eight items (n = 58) were generated for rating and at the end of three iterative rounds, there was agreement that thirty-eight items were important, that two were not important, and there was no agreement for a further eighteen items. Item themes reaching consensus included footwear characteristics and acceptability and psychosocial aspects of footwear. Footwear characteristics related to heel height, shape, cushioning, toe box size, adjustable fastening, removable insoles, mid-foot support and soft accommodative uppers. Acceptability and psychosocial aspects included affordability, comfort, aesthetic, style, colour and impact on femininity.
This consensus exercise has identified the important features of retail footwear for women with RA. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1371/journal.pone.0226906 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_plos_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_plos_journals_2330969169</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_688bf69ae5734348b28ba1c5054196af</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>2331254340</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c526t-22ddf7fce32082ed2c193ab5b085a4c08d0c60ee4cd335ba05df90c14ac8bdca3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptUk1v1DAQjRCIlsI_QGCJC5dd_JF4HQ6VqvK1UiUucLYm9rjxKokX22nVf4_bTasWcbI9fu_Nm9GrqreMrpnYsE-7MMcJhvU-TLimnMuWymfVMWsFX0lOxfNH96PqVUo7ShuhpHxZHQmmFKP15riC7bgPMcOUiUPIc8REgiMRM_iBpD6UtwuRXIcRJ3Ltc09ij_MIOXhLIOY--uzTZ3JGvuCw7z0xYUo4pTmRNMcrvHldvXAwJHyznCfV729ff53_WF38_L49P7tYmYbLvOLcWrdxBgWniqPlpriHrumoaqA2VFlqJEWsjRWi6YA21rXUsBqM6qwBcVK9P-juh5D0sp2kuRC0lS2TbUFsDwgbYKf30Y8Qb3QAr-8KIV7qMpA3A2qpVOdkC9hsRC1q1XHVATMNbWrWSnBF63TpNncjWoNTjjA8EX36M_leX4YrXXzUZf1F4OMiEMOfGVPWo08GhwEmDPOdb8ab0psW6Id_oP-frj6gTAwpRXQPZhjVt4m5Z-nbxOglMYX27vEgD6T7iIi_STDBHA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2330969169</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Important features of retail shoes for women with rheumatoid arthritis: A Delphi consensus survey</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry</source><creator>Tehan, Peta Ellen ; Taylor, William J ; Carroll, Matthew ; Dalbeth, Nicola ; Rome, Keith</creator><contributor>ten Klooster, Peter M.</contributor><creatorcontrib>Tehan, Peta Ellen ; Taylor, William J ; Carroll, Matthew ; Dalbeth, Nicola ; Rome, Keith ; ten Klooster, Peter M.</creatorcontrib><description>Footwear management aims to preserve foot function, reduce the burden of foot pain and maintain joint mobility in women with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Whilst retail footwear is commonly recommended by health professionals, there is no current consensus on recommended features of retail footwear for women with RA. This study aimed to determine consensus from health professionals about the important features of retail footwear for women with RA.
An international Delphi exercise using online survey software was conducted with 39 participants from health care backgrounds. Three iterative rounds were conducted. In the first round, participants listed features of retail footwear that would be important for women with RA. Responses of the first round, combined with results of a scoping review of patient-reported outcome measures used in assessing footwear in arthritis and a qualitative analysis of female patients' perspectives of retail footwear in RA were used to create items for the second round. Items were scored by a 9-point rating scale with consensus defined by the RAND/UCLA disagreement index. The third round consisted of items which did not reach consensus or scored >1 on the RAND/UCLA disagreement index from round two.
Fifty-eight items (n = 58) were generated for rating and at the end of three iterative rounds, there was agreement that thirty-eight items were important, that two were not important, and there was no agreement for a further eighteen items. Item themes reaching consensus included footwear characteristics and acceptability and psychosocial aspects of footwear. Footwear characteristics related to heel height, shape, cushioning, toe box size, adjustable fastening, removable insoles, mid-foot support and soft accommodative uppers. Acceptability and psychosocial aspects included affordability, comfort, aesthetic, style, colour and impact on femininity.
This consensus exercise has identified the important features of retail footwear for women with RA.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0226906</identifier><identifier>PMID: 31881047</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Public Library of Science</publisher><subject>Acceptability ; Arthritis ; Arthritis, Rheumatoid - epidemiology ; Arthritis, Rheumatoid - prevention & control ; Biology and Life Sciences ; Consensus ; Cushioning ; Delphi Technique ; Environmental science ; Feet ; Female ; Femininity ; Foot diseases ; Footwear ; Health ; Health Personnel ; Health sciences ; Heels ; Humans ; Insoles ; Medical personnel ; Medicine and Health Sciences ; Pain ; Polls & surveys ; Professionals ; Qualitative analysis ; Research and Analysis Methods ; Researchers ; Rheumatoid arthritis ; Rheumatology ; Shoes ; Shoes - adverse effects ; Social Sciences</subject><ispartof>PloS one, 2019-12, Vol.14 (12), p.e0226906</ispartof><rights>2019 Tehan et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>2019 Tehan et al 2019 Tehan et al</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c526t-22ddf7fce32082ed2c193ab5b085a4c08d0c60ee4cd335ba05df90c14ac8bdca3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c526t-22ddf7fce32082ed2c193ab5b085a4c08d0c60ee4cd335ba05df90c14ac8bdca3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-0014-3023 ; 0000-0001-6075-8479</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6934318/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6934318/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,864,885,2102,2928,23866,27924,27925,53791,53793,79600,79601</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31881047$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>ten Klooster, Peter M.</contributor><creatorcontrib>Tehan, Peta Ellen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Taylor, William J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carroll, Matthew</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dalbeth, Nicola</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rome, Keith</creatorcontrib><title>Important features of retail shoes for women with rheumatoid arthritis: A Delphi consensus survey</title><title>PloS one</title><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><description>Footwear management aims to preserve foot function, reduce the burden of foot pain and maintain joint mobility in women with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Whilst retail footwear is commonly recommended by health professionals, there is no current consensus on recommended features of retail footwear for women with RA. This study aimed to determine consensus from health professionals about the important features of retail footwear for women with RA.
An international Delphi exercise using online survey software was conducted with 39 participants from health care backgrounds. Three iterative rounds were conducted. In the first round, participants listed features of retail footwear that would be important for women with RA. Responses of the first round, combined with results of a scoping review of patient-reported outcome measures used in assessing footwear in arthritis and a qualitative analysis of female patients' perspectives of retail footwear in RA were used to create items for the second round. Items were scored by a 9-point rating scale with consensus defined by the RAND/UCLA disagreement index. The third round consisted of items which did not reach consensus or scored >1 on the RAND/UCLA disagreement index from round two.
Fifty-eight items (n = 58) were generated for rating and at the end of three iterative rounds, there was agreement that thirty-eight items were important, that two were not important, and there was no agreement for a further eighteen items. Item themes reaching consensus included footwear characteristics and acceptability and psychosocial aspects of footwear. Footwear characteristics related to heel height, shape, cushioning, toe box size, adjustable fastening, removable insoles, mid-foot support and soft accommodative uppers. Acceptability and psychosocial aspects included affordability, comfort, aesthetic, style, colour and impact on femininity.
This consensus exercise has identified the important features of retail footwear for women with RA.</description><subject>Acceptability</subject><subject>Arthritis</subject><subject>Arthritis, Rheumatoid - epidemiology</subject><subject>Arthritis, Rheumatoid - prevention & control</subject><subject>Biology and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Consensus</subject><subject>Cushioning</subject><subject>Delphi Technique</subject><subject>Environmental science</subject><subject>Feet</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Femininity</subject><subject>Foot diseases</subject><subject>Footwear</subject><subject>Health</subject><subject>Health Personnel</subject><subject>Health sciences</subject><subject>Heels</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Insoles</subject><subject>Medical personnel</subject><subject>Medicine and Health Sciences</subject><subject>Pain</subject><subject>Polls & surveys</subject><subject>Professionals</subject><subject>Qualitative analysis</subject><subject>Research and Analysis Methods</subject><subject>Researchers</subject><subject>Rheumatoid arthritis</subject><subject>Rheumatology</subject><subject>Shoes</subject><subject>Shoes - adverse effects</subject><subject>Social Sciences</subject><issn>1932-6203</issn><issn>1932-6203</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNptUk1v1DAQjRCIlsI_QGCJC5dd_JF4HQ6VqvK1UiUucLYm9rjxKokX22nVf4_bTasWcbI9fu_Nm9GrqreMrpnYsE-7MMcJhvU-TLimnMuWymfVMWsFX0lOxfNH96PqVUo7ShuhpHxZHQmmFKP15riC7bgPMcOUiUPIc8REgiMRM_iBpD6UtwuRXIcRJ3Ltc09ij_MIOXhLIOY--uzTZ3JGvuCw7z0xYUo4pTmRNMcrvHldvXAwJHyznCfV729ff53_WF38_L49P7tYmYbLvOLcWrdxBgWniqPlpriHrumoaqA2VFlqJEWsjRWi6YA21rXUsBqM6qwBcVK9P-juh5D0sp2kuRC0lS2TbUFsDwgbYKf30Y8Qb3QAr-8KIV7qMpA3A2qpVOdkC9hsRC1q1XHVATMNbWrWSnBF63TpNncjWoNTjjA8EX36M_leX4YrXXzUZf1F4OMiEMOfGVPWo08GhwEmDPOdb8ab0psW6Id_oP-frj6gTAwpRXQPZhjVt4m5Z-nbxOglMYX27vEgD6T7iIi_STDBHA</recordid><startdate>20191227</startdate><enddate>20191227</enddate><creator>Tehan, Peta Ellen</creator><creator>Taylor, William J</creator><creator>Carroll, Matthew</creator><creator>Dalbeth, Nicola</creator><creator>Rome, Keith</creator><general>Public Library of Science</general><general>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0014-3023</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6075-8479</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20191227</creationdate><title>Important features of retail shoes for women with rheumatoid arthritis: A Delphi consensus survey</title><author>Tehan, Peta Ellen ; Taylor, William J ; Carroll, Matthew ; Dalbeth, Nicola ; Rome, Keith</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c526t-22ddf7fce32082ed2c193ab5b085a4c08d0c60ee4cd335ba05df90c14ac8bdca3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Acceptability</topic><topic>Arthritis</topic><topic>Arthritis, Rheumatoid - epidemiology</topic><topic>Arthritis, Rheumatoid - prevention & control</topic><topic>Biology and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Consensus</topic><topic>Cushioning</topic><topic>Delphi Technique</topic><topic>Environmental science</topic><topic>Feet</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Femininity</topic><topic>Foot diseases</topic><topic>Footwear</topic><topic>Health</topic><topic>Health Personnel</topic><topic>Health sciences</topic><topic>Heels</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Insoles</topic><topic>Medical personnel</topic><topic>Medicine and Health Sciences</topic><topic>Pain</topic><topic>Polls & surveys</topic><topic>Professionals</topic><topic>Qualitative analysis</topic><topic>Research and Analysis Methods</topic><topic>Researchers</topic><topic>Rheumatoid arthritis</topic><topic>Rheumatology</topic><topic>Shoes</topic><topic>Shoes - adverse effects</topic><topic>Social Sciences</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Tehan, Peta Ellen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Taylor, William J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carroll, Matthew</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dalbeth, Nicola</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rome, Keith</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Materials Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Tehan, Peta Ellen</au><au>Taylor, William J</au><au>Carroll, Matthew</au><au>Dalbeth, Nicola</au><au>Rome, Keith</au><au>ten Klooster, Peter M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Important features of retail shoes for women with rheumatoid arthritis: A Delphi consensus survey</atitle><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><date>2019-12-27</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>14</volume><issue>12</issue><spage>e0226906</spage><pages>e0226906-</pages><issn>1932-6203</issn><eissn>1932-6203</eissn><abstract>Footwear management aims to preserve foot function, reduce the burden of foot pain and maintain joint mobility in women with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Whilst retail footwear is commonly recommended by health professionals, there is no current consensus on recommended features of retail footwear for women with RA. This study aimed to determine consensus from health professionals about the important features of retail footwear for women with RA.
An international Delphi exercise using online survey software was conducted with 39 participants from health care backgrounds. Three iterative rounds were conducted. In the first round, participants listed features of retail footwear that would be important for women with RA. Responses of the first round, combined with results of a scoping review of patient-reported outcome measures used in assessing footwear in arthritis and a qualitative analysis of female patients' perspectives of retail footwear in RA were used to create items for the second round. Items were scored by a 9-point rating scale with consensus defined by the RAND/UCLA disagreement index. The third round consisted of items which did not reach consensus or scored >1 on the RAND/UCLA disagreement index from round two.
Fifty-eight items (n = 58) were generated for rating and at the end of three iterative rounds, there was agreement that thirty-eight items were important, that two were not important, and there was no agreement for a further eighteen items. Item themes reaching consensus included footwear characteristics and acceptability and psychosocial aspects of footwear. Footwear characteristics related to heel height, shape, cushioning, toe box size, adjustable fastening, removable insoles, mid-foot support and soft accommodative uppers. Acceptability and psychosocial aspects included affordability, comfort, aesthetic, style, colour and impact on femininity.
This consensus exercise has identified the important features of retail footwear for women with RA.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Public Library of Science</pub><pmid>31881047</pmid><doi>10.1371/journal.pone.0226906</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0014-3023</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6075-8479</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 1932-6203 |
| ispartof | PloS one, 2019-12, Vol.14 (12), p.e0226906 |
| issn | 1932-6203 1932-6203 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_plos_journals_2330969169 |
| source | MEDLINE; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Public Library of Science (PLoS); EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central; Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry |
| subjects | Acceptability Arthritis Arthritis, Rheumatoid - epidemiology Arthritis, Rheumatoid - prevention & control Biology and Life Sciences Consensus Cushioning Delphi Technique Environmental science Feet Female Femininity Foot diseases Footwear Health Health Personnel Health sciences Heels Humans Insoles Medical personnel Medicine and Health Sciences Pain Polls & surveys Professionals Qualitative analysis Research and Analysis Methods Researchers Rheumatoid arthritis Rheumatology Shoes Shoes - adverse effects Social Sciences |
| title | Important features of retail shoes for women with rheumatoid arthritis: A Delphi consensus survey |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-06T14%3A54%3A20IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_plos_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Important%20features%20of%20retail%20shoes%20for%20women%20with%20rheumatoid%20arthritis:%20A%20Delphi%20consensus%20survey&rft.jtitle=PloS%20one&rft.au=Tehan,%20Peta%20Ellen&rft.date=2019-12-27&rft.volume=14&rft.issue=12&rft.spage=e0226906&rft.pages=e0226906-&rft.issn=1932-6203&rft.eissn=1932-6203&rft_id=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0226906&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_plos_%3E2331254340%3C/proquest_plos_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2330969169&rft_id=info:pmid/31881047&rft_doaj_id=oai_doaj_org_article_688bf69ae5734348b28ba1c5054196af&rfr_iscdi=true |