Recording behaviour of indoor-housed farm animals automatically using machine vision technology: A systematic review
Large-scale phenotyping of animal behaviour traits is time consuming and has led to increased demand for technologies that can automate these procedures. Automated tracking of animals has been successful in controlled laboratory settings, but recording from animals in large groups in highly variable...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | PloS one 2019-12, Vol.14 (12), p.e0226669-e0226669 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | e0226669 |
---|---|
container_issue | 12 |
container_start_page | e0226669 |
container_title | PloS one |
container_volume | 14 |
creator | Wurtz, Kaitlin Camerlink, Irene D'Eath, Richard B Fernández, Alberto Peña Norton, Tomas Steibel, Juan Siegford, Janice |
description | Large-scale phenotyping of animal behaviour traits is time consuming and has led to increased demand for technologies that can automate these procedures. Automated tracking of animals has been successful in controlled laboratory settings, but recording from animals in large groups in highly variable farm settings presents challenges. The aim of this review is to provide a systematic overview of the advances that have occurred in automated, high throughput image detection of farm animal behavioural traits with welfare and production implications. Peer-reviewed publications written in English were reviewed systematically following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. After identification, screening, and assessment for eligibility, 108 publications met these specifications and were included for qualitative synthesis. Data collected from the papers included camera specifications, housing conditions, group size, algorithm details, procedures, and results. Most studies utilized standard digital colour video cameras for data collection, with increasing use of 3D cameras in papers published after 2013. Papers including pigs (across production stages) were the most common (n = 63). The most common behaviours recorded included activity level, area occupancy, aggression, gait scores, resource use, and posture. Our review revealed many overlaps in methods applied to analysing behaviour, and most studies started from scratch instead of building upon previous work. Training and validation sample sizes were generally small (mean±s.d. groups = 3.8±5.8) and in data collection and testing took place in relatively controlled environments. To advance our ability to automatically phenotype behaviour, future research should build upon existing knowledge and validate technology under commercial settings and publications should explicitly describe recording conditions in detail to allow studies to be reproduced. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1371/journal.pone.0226669 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_plos_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_plos_journals_2330057432</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A609588086</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_f88ce121cf4c49a8bd8165cdaea5ba94</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A609588086</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-5a2aa6bfd663b82ab14aced0be25bd6654d70c4db5a53a68d95e0aa74e62a8063</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNk02L2zAQhk1p6W63_QelNRRKe0hqS7Yi91AISz8CCwvbj6sYS-NYQbaykp02_75y4l3isoeig8X4ed_RjDRR9DJN5ildpB82tnctmPnWtjhPCGGMFY-i87SgZMZIQh-f7M-iZ95vkiSnnLGn0RlNOSsoy86j7galdUq367jEGnY6uMa2inWrrHWz2vYeVVyBa2JodQPGx9B3toFOSzBmH_d-0DYga91ivNNe2zbuUNatNXa9_xgvY7_3HR4UscOdxt_PoydVcMIX4_ci-vnl84_Lb7Or66-ry-XVTLKCdLMcCAArK8UYLTmBMs1AokpKJHkZgnmmFonMVJlDToFxVeSYACwyZAR4wuhF9ProuzXWi7FhXhBKQysWGSWBWB0JZWEjti5U6PbCghaHgHVrAS4c3KCoOJeYklRWmcwK4KXiKculAoS8hCILXp_GbH3ZoJLYdg7MxHT6p9W1WNudCMUuWJoHg3ejgbO3PfpONNpLNAZaDPdwODclnLMh15t_0IerG6k1hAJ0W9mQVw6mYsmSIuc84UOX5g9QYSlstAyvq9IhPhG8nwgC0-Gfbg2992L1_eb_2etfU_btCVsjmK721vRdeFJ-CmZHUDrrvcPqvslpIobhuOuGGIZDjMMRZK9OL-hedDcN9C8Bvw0w</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2330057432</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Recording behaviour of indoor-housed farm animals automatically using machine vision technology: A systematic review</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry</source><source>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</source><creator>Wurtz, Kaitlin ; Camerlink, Irene ; D'Eath, Richard B ; Fernández, Alberto Peña ; Norton, Tomas ; Steibel, Juan ; Siegford, Janice</creator><creatorcontrib>Wurtz, Kaitlin ; Camerlink, Irene ; D'Eath, Richard B ; Fernández, Alberto Peña ; Norton, Tomas ; Steibel, Juan ; Siegford, Janice</creatorcontrib><description>Large-scale phenotyping of animal behaviour traits is time consuming and has led to increased demand for technologies that can automate these procedures. Automated tracking of animals has been successful in controlled laboratory settings, but recording from animals in large groups in highly variable farm settings presents challenges. The aim of this review is to provide a systematic overview of the advances that have occurred in automated, high throughput image detection of farm animal behavioural traits with welfare and production implications. Peer-reviewed publications written in English were reviewed systematically following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. After identification, screening, and assessment for eligibility, 108 publications met these specifications and were included for qualitative synthesis. Data collected from the papers included camera specifications, housing conditions, group size, algorithm details, procedures, and results. Most studies utilized standard digital colour video cameras for data collection, with increasing use of 3D cameras in papers published after 2013. Papers including pigs (across production stages) were the most common (n = 63). The most common behaviours recorded included activity level, area occupancy, aggression, gait scores, resource use, and posture. Our review revealed many overlaps in methods applied to analysing behaviour, and most studies started from scratch instead of building upon previous work. Training and validation sample sizes were generally small (mean±s.d. groups = 3.8±5.8) and in data collection and testing took place in relatively controlled environments. To advance our ability to automatically phenotype behaviour, future research should build upon existing knowledge and validate technology under commercial settings and publications should explicitly describe recording conditions in detail to allow studies to be reproduced.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0226669</identifier><identifier>PMID: 31869364</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Public Library of Science</publisher><subject>Agricultural equipment ; Algorithms ; Analysis ; Animal behavior ; Animal genetic engineering ; Animal Husbandry - methods ; Animal sciences ; Animal Welfare ; Animals ; Animals, Domestic - physiology ; Automatic control ; Automation ; Behavior, Animal ; Biology and Life Sciences ; Cameras ; Computer and Information Sciences ; Computer vision ; Data bases ; Data collection ; Documents ; Engineering and Technology ; Farm management ; Farms ; Gait ; Global positioning systems ; GPS ; Group size ; Health screening ; Housing ; Image detection ; Information sources ; Internet of Things ; Literature reviews ; Livestock ; Livestock housing ; Machine vision ; Occupancy ; Phenotypes ; Phenotyping ; Physical Sciences ; Posture ; Poultry ; Qualitative analysis ; Recording ; Research and Analysis Methods ; Researchers ; Reviews ; Sensors ; Social Sciences ; Specifications ; Swine ; Systematic review ; Technology ; Veterinary medicine ; Video cameras ; Video Recording - methods ; Vision systems ; Zoology</subject><ispartof>PloS one, 2019-12, Vol.14 (12), p.e0226669-e0226669</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2019 Public Library of Science</rights><rights>2019 Wurtz et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>2019 Wurtz et al 2019 Wurtz et al</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-5a2aa6bfd663b82ab14aced0be25bd6654d70c4db5a53a68d95e0aa74e62a8063</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-5a2aa6bfd663b82ab14aced0be25bd6654d70c4db5a53a68d95e0aa74e62a8063</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-0161-3189 ; 0000-0001-7566-1573 ; 0000-0002-3427-2210</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6927615/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6927615/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,860,881,2096,2915,23845,27901,27902,53766,53768,79342,79343</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31869364$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Wurtz, Kaitlin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Camerlink, Irene</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>D'Eath, Richard B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fernández, Alberto Peña</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Norton, Tomas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Steibel, Juan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Siegford, Janice</creatorcontrib><title>Recording behaviour of indoor-housed farm animals automatically using machine vision technology: A systematic review</title><title>PloS one</title><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><description>Large-scale phenotyping of animal behaviour traits is time consuming and has led to increased demand for technologies that can automate these procedures. Automated tracking of animals has been successful in controlled laboratory settings, but recording from animals in large groups in highly variable farm settings presents challenges. The aim of this review is to provide a systematic overview of the advances that have occurred in automated, high throughput image detection of farm animal behavioural traits with welfare and production implications. Peer-reviewed publications written in English were reviewed systematically following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. After identification, screening, and assessment for eligibility, 108 publications met these specifications and were included for qualitative synthesis. Data collected from the papers included camera specifications, housing conditions, group size, algorithm details, procedures, and results. Most studies utilized standard digital colour video cameras for data collection, with increasing use of 3D cameras in papers published after 2013. Papers including pigs (across production stages) were the most common (n = 63). The most common behaviours recorded included activity level, area occupancy, aggression, gait scores, resource use, and posture. Our review revealed many overlaps in methods applied to analysing behaviour, and most studies started from scratch instead of building upon previous work. Training and validation sample sizes were generally small (mean±s.d. groups = 3.8±5.8) and in data collection and testing took place in relatively controlled environments. To advance our ability to automatically phenotype behaviour, future research should build upon existing knowledge and validate technology under commercial settings and publications should explicitly describe recording conditions in detail to allow studies to be reproduced.</description><subject>Agricultural equipment</subject><subject>Algorithms</subject><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>Animal behavior</subject><subject>Animal genetic engineering</subject><subject>Animal Husbandry - methods</subject><subject>Animal sciences</subject><subject>Animal Welfare</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Animals, Domestic - physiology</subject><subject>Automatic control</subject><subject>Automation</subject><subject>Behavior, Animal</subject><subject>Biology and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Cameras</subject><subject>Computer and Information Sciences</subject><subject>Computer vision</subject><subject>Data bases</subject><subject>Data collection</subject><subject>Documents</subject><subject>Engineering and Technology</subject><subject>Farm management</subject><subject>Farms</subject><subject>Gait</subject><subject>Global positioning systems</subject><subject>GPS</subject><subject>Group size</subject><subject>Health screening</subject><subject>Housing</subject><subject>Image detection</subject><subject>Information sources</subject><subject>Internet of Things</subject><subject>Literature reviews</subject><subject>Livestock</subject><subject>Livestock housing</subject><subject>Machine vision</subject><subject>Occupancy</subject><subject>Phenotypes</subject><subject>Phenotyping</subject><subject>Physical Sciences</subject><subject>Posture</subject><subject>Poultry</subject><subject>Qualitative analysis</subject><subject>Recording</subject><subject>Research and Analysis Methods</subject><subject>Researchers</subject><subject>Reviews</subject><subject>Sensors</subject><subject>Social Sciences</subject><subject>Specifications</subject><subject>Swine</subject><subject>Systematic review</subject><subject>Technology</subject><subject>Veterinary medicine</subject><subject>Video cameras</subject><subject>Video Recording - methods</subject><subject>Vision systems</subject><subject>Zoology</subject><issn>1932-6203</issn><issn>1932-6203</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNqNk02L2zAQhk1p6W63_QelNRRKe0hqS7Yi91AISz8CCwvbj6sYS-NYQbaykp02_75y4l3isoeig8X4ed_RjDRR9DJN5ildpB82tnctmPnWtjhPCGGMFY-i87SgZMZIQh-f7M-iZ95vkiSnnLGn0RlNOSsoy86j7galdUq367jEGnY6uMa2inWrrHWz2vYeVVyBa2JodQPGx9B3toFOSzBmH_d-0DYga91ivNNe2zbuUNatNXa9_xgvY7_3HR4UscOdxt_PoydVcMIX4_ci-vnl84_Lb7Or66-ry-XVTLKCdLMcCAArK8UYLTmBMs1AokpKJHkZgnmmFonMVJlDToFxVeSYACwyZAR4wuhF9ProuzXWi7FhXhBKQysWGSWBWB0JZWEjti5U6PbCghaHgHVrAS4c3KCoOJeYklRWmcwK4KXiKculAoS8hCILXp_GbH3ZoJLYdg7MxHT6p9W1WNudCMUuWJoHg3ejgbO3PfpONNpLNAZaDPdwODclnLMh15t_0IerG6k1hAJ0W9mQVw6mYsmSIuc84UOX5g9QYSlstAyvq9IhPhG8nwgC0-Gfbg2992L1_eb_2etfU_btCVsjmK721vRdeFJ-CmZHUDrrvcPqvslpIobhuOuGGIZDjMMRZK9OL-hedDcN9C8Bvw0w</recordid><startdate>20191223</startdate><enddate>20191223</enddate><creator>Wurtz, Kaitlin</creator><creator>Camerlink, Irene</creator><creator>D'Eath, Richard B</creator><creator>Fernández, Alberto Peña</creator><creator>Norton, Tomas</creator><creator>Steibel, Juan</creator><creator>Siegford, Janice</creator><general>Public Library of Science</general><general>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>IOV</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0161-3189</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7566-1573</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3427-2210</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20191223</creationdate><title>Recording behaviour of indoor-housed farm animals automatically using machine vision technology: A systematic review</title><author>Wurtz, Kaitlin ; Camerlink, Irene ; D'Eath, Richard B ; Fernández, Alberto Peña ; Norton, Tomas ; Steibel, Juan ; Siegford, Janice</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-5a2aa6bfd663b82ab14aced0be25bd6654d70c4db5a53a68d95e0aa74e62a8063</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Agricultural equipment</topic><topic>Algorithms</topic><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>Animal behavior</topic><topic>Animal genetic engineering</topic><topic>Animal Husbandry - methods</topic><topic>Animal sciences</topic><topic>Animal Welfare</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Animals, Domestic - physiology</topic><topic>Automatic control</topic><topic>Automation</topic><topic>Behavior, Animal</topic><topic>Biology and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Cameras</topic><topic>Computer and Information Sciences</topic><topic>Computer vision</topic><topic>Data bases</topic><topic>Data collection</topic><topic>Documents</topic><topic>Engineering and Technology</topic><topic>Farm management</topic><topic>Farms</topic><topic>Gait</topic><topic>Global positioning systems</topic><topic>GPS</topic><topic>Group size</topic><topic>Health screening</topic><topic>Housing</topic><topic>Image detection</topic><topic>Information sources</topic><topic>Internet of Things</topic><topic>Literature reviews</topic><topic>Livestock</topic><topic>Livestock housing</topic><topic>Machine vision</topic><topic>Occupancy</topic><topic>Phenotypes</topic><topic>Phenotyping</topic><topic>Physical Sciences</topic><topic>Posture</topic><topic>Poultry</topic><topic>Qualitative analysis</topic><topic>Recording</topic><topic>Research and Analysis Methods</topic><topic>Researchers</topic><topic>Reviews</topic><topic>Sensors</topic><topic>Social Sciences</topic><topic>Specifications</topic><topic>Swine</topic><topic>Systematic review</topic><topic>Technology</topic><topic>Veterinary medicine</topic><topic>Video cameras</topic><topic>Video Recording - methods</topic><topic>Vision systems</topic><topic>Zoology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Wurtz, Kaitlin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Camerlink, Irene</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>D'Eath, Richard B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fernández, Alberto Peña</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Norton, Tomas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Steibel, Juan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Siegford, Janice</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Opposing Viewpoints</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Materials Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Wurtz, Kaitlin</au><au>Camerlink, Irene</au><au>D'Eath, Richard B</au><au>Fernández, Alberto Peña</au><au>Norton, Tomas</au><au>Steibel, Juan</au><au>Siegford, Janice</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Recording behaviour of indoor-housed farm animals automatically using machine vision technology: A systematic review</atitle><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><date>2019-12-23</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>14</volume><issue>12</issue><spage>e0226669</spage><epage>e0226669</epage><pages>e0226669-e0226669</pages><issn>1932-6203</issn><eissn>1932-6203</eissn><abstract>Large-scale phenotyping of animal behaviour traits is time consuming and has led to increased demand for technologies that can automate these procedures. Automated tracking of animals has been successful in controlled laboratory settings, but recording from animals in large groups in highly variable farm settings presents challenges. The aim of this review is to provide a systematic overview of the advances that have occurred in automated, high throughput image detection of farm animal behavioural traits with welfare and production implications. Peer-reviewed publications written in English were reviewed systematically following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. After identification, screening, and assessment for eligibility, 108 publications met these specifications and were included for qualitative synthesis. Data collected from the papers included camera specifications, housing conditions, group size, algorithm details, procedures, and results. Most studies utilized standard digital colour video cameras for data collection, with increasing use of 3D cameras in papers published after 2013. Papers including pigs (across production stages) were the most common (n = 63). The most common behaviours recorded included activity level, area occupancy, aggression, gait scores, resource use, and posture. Our review revealed many overlaps in methods applied to analysing behaviour, and most studies started from scratch instead of building upon previous work. Training and validation sample sizes were generally small (mean±s.d. groups = 3.8±5.8) and in data collection and testing took place in relatively controlled environments. To advance our ability to automatically phenotype behaviour, future research should build upon existing knowledge and validate technology under commercial settings and publications should explicitly describe recording conditions in detail to allow studies to be reproduced.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Public Library of Science</pub><pmid>31869364</pmid><doi>10.1371/journal.pone.0226669</doi><tpages>e0226669</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0161-3189</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7566-1573</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3427-2210</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1932-6203 |
ispartof | PloS one, 2019-12, Vol.14 (12), p.e0226669-e0226669 |
issn | 1932-6203 1932-6203 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_plos_journals_2330057432 |
source | MEDLINE; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; PubMed Central; Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry; Public Library of Science (PLoS) |
subjects | Agricultural equipment Algorithms Analysis Animal behavior Animal genetic engineering Animal Husbandry - methods Animal sciences Animal Welfare Animals Animals, Domestic - physiology Automatic control Automation Behavior, Animal Biology and Life Sciences Cameras Computer and Information Sciences Computer vision Data bases Data collection Documents Engineering and Technology Farm management Farms Gait Global positioning systems GPS Group size Health screening Housing Image detection Information sources Internet of Things Literature reviews Livestock Livestock housing Machine vision Occupancy Phenotypes Phenotyping Physical Sciences Posture Poultry Qualitative analysis Recording Research and Analysis Methods Researchers Reviews Sensors Social Sciences Specifications Swine Systematic review Technology Veterinary medicine Video cameras Video Recording - methods Vision systems Zoology |
title | Recording behaviour of indoor-housed farm animals automatically using machine vision technology: A systematic review |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-09T04%3A45%3A18IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_plos_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Recording%20behaviour%20of%20indoor-housed%20farm%20animals%20automatically%20using%20machine%20vision%20technology:%20A%20systematic%20review&rft.jtitle=PloS%20one&rft.au=Wurtz,%20Kaitlin&rft.date=2019-12-23&rft.volume=14&rft.issue=12&rft.spage=e0226669&rft.epage=e0226669&rft.pages=e0226669-e0226669&rft.issn=1932-6203&rft.eissn=1932-6203&rft_id=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0226669&rft_dat=%3Cgale_plos_%3EA609588086%3C/gale_plos_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2330057432&rft_id=info:pmid/31869364&rft_galeid=A609588086&rft_doaj_id=oai_doaj_org_article_f88ce121cf4c49a8bd8165cdaea5ba94&rfr_iscdi=true |