Perceived attractiveness of Czech faces across 10 cultures: Associations with sexual shape dimorphism, averageness, fluctuating asymmetry, and eye color

Research on the perception of faces typically assumes that there are some universal values of attractiveness which are shared across individuals and cultures. The perception of attractiveness may, however, vary across cultures due to local differences in both facial morphology and standards of beaut...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:PloS one 2019-11, Vol.14 (11), p.e0225549
Hauptverfasser: Kočnar, Tomáš, Saribay, S Adil, Kleisner, Karel
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 11
container_start_page e0225549
container_title PloS one
container_volume 14
creator Kočnar, Tomáš
Saribay, S Adil
Kleisner, Karel
description Research on the perception of faces typically assumes that there are some universal values of attractiveness which are shared across individuals and cultures. The perception of attractiveness may, however, vary across cultures due to local differences in both facial morphology and standards of beauty. To examine cross-cultural consensus in the ratings of attractiveness, we presented a set of 120 non-manipulated photographs of Czech faces to ten samples of raters from both European (Czech Republic, Estonia, Sweden, Romania, Turkey, Portugal) and non-European countries (Brazil, India, Cameroon, Namibia). We examined the relative contribution of three facial markers (sexual shape dimorphism, averageness, fluctuating asymmetry) to the perception of attractiveness as well as the possible influence of eye color, which is a locally specific trait. In general, we found that both male and female faces which were closer to the average and more feminine in shape were regarded as more attractive, while fluctuating asymmetry had no effect. Despite a high cross-cultural consensus on attractiveness standards, significant differences in the perception of attractiveness seem to be related to the level of socio-economic development (as measured by the Human Development Index, HDI). Attractiveness ratings by raters from low-HDI countries (India, Cameroon, Namibia) converged less with ratings from Czech Republic than ratings from high-HDI countries (European countries and Brazil). With respect to eye color, some local patterns emerged which we discuss as a consequence of negative frequency-dependent selection.
doi_str_mv 10.1371/journal.pone.0225549
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_plos_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_plos_journals_2316786004</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A606436407</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_56a99b19f58e42f6a00af10eccd26bab</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A606436407</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-3fa19dfa0a1c1b9d9c4befa2bee6e79e865eced033c0fbbe7ba13d934d8d93603</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNk9tq3DAQhk1padK0b1BaQaG0kN1Kli3bvSiE0EMgkNLTrRjLo7WCbG0lOc32Sfq41W42IVtyUQTWMP7-39ZoJsueMjpnvGJvzt3kR7DzpRtxTvO8LIvmXrbPGp7PRE75_VvxXvYohHNKS14L8TDb46wqWcHz_ezPZ_QKzQV2BGL0oGKKRwyBOE2Of6PqiQaFgYDyLmUZJWqycfIY3pKjEJwyEI0bA_llYk8CXk5gSehhiaQzg_PL3oThkMAFelhsnA-JtpOKU9KNCwJhNQwY_SoxY0dwhUQ56_zj7IEGG_DJdj_Ivn94_-340-z07OPJ8dHpTIkmjzOugTWdBgpMsbbpGlW0qCFvEQVWDdaiRIUd5VxR3bZYtcB41_Ciq9NTUH6QPb_yXVoX5LaoQeaciaoWlBaJOLkiOgfncunNAH4lHRi5STi_kOCjURZlKaBpWtbossYi1wIoBc0oKtXlooU2eb3bfm1qB-wUjqnmdsd0981oerlwF1LUVZ7TOhm82hp493PCEOVggkJrYUQ3bf67KmvepKs_yF78g959ui21gHQAM2q37oK1qTwSVBRcFLRK1PwOKq0OB6NSB2qT8juC1zuCxES8jAuYQpAnX7_8P3v2Y5d9eYvtEWzsg7PTpgd3weIK3PStR31TZEbleoCuqyHXAyS3A5Rkz25f0I3oemL4X906Gk4</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2316786004</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Perceived attractiveness of Czech faces across 10 cultures: Associations with sexual shape dimorphism, averageness, fluctuating asymmetry, and eye color</title><source>Public Library of Science (PLoS) Journals Open Access</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry</source><creator>Kočnar, Tomáš ; Saribay, S Adil ; Kleisner, Karel</creator><contributor>Sorokowski, Piotr</contributor><creatorcontrib>Kočnar, Tomáš ; Saribay, S Adil ; Kleisner, Karel ; Sorokowski, Piotr</creatorcontrib><description>Research on the perception of faces typically assumes that there are some universal values of attractiveness which are shared across individuals and cultures. The perception of attractiveness may, however, vary across cultures due to local differences in both facial morphology and standards of beauty. To examine cross-cultural consensus in the ratings of attractiveness, we presented a set of 120 non-manipulated photographs of Czech faces to ten samples of raters from both European (Czech Republic, Estonia, Sweden, Romania, Turkey, Portugal) and non-European countries (Brazil, India, Cameroon, Namibia). We examined the relative contribution of three facial markers (sexual shape dimorphism, averageness, fluctuating asymmetry) to the perception of attractiveness as well as the possible influence of eye color, which is a locally specific trait. In general, we found that both male and female faces which were closer to the average and more feminine in shape were regarded as more attractive, while fluctuating asymmetry had no effect. Despite a high cross-cultural consensus on attractiveness standards, significant differences in the perception of attractiveness seem to be related to the level of socio-economic development (as measured by the Human Development Index, HDI). Attractiveness ratings by raters from low-HDI countries (India, Cameroon, Namibia) converged less with ratings from Czech Republic than ratings from high-HDI countries (European countries and Brazil). With respect to eye color, some local patterns emerged which we discuss as a consequence of negative frequency-dependent selection.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0225549</identifier><identifier>PMID: 31751432</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Public Library of Science</publisher><subject>Adult ; Africa ; Asymmetry ; Attraction ; Biology and Life Sciences ; Brazil ; Color ; Color vision ; Cross-Cultural Comparison ; Czech Republic ; Economic development ; Europe ; Eye Color ; Face - anatomy &amp; histology ; Female ; Feminine beauty (Aesthetics) ; Femininity ; Fluctuating asymmetry ; Frequency dependence ; Genetic engineering ; Humans ; Hypotheses ; India ; Internet access ; Masculinity ; Medicine and Health Sciences ; Morphology ; People and Places ; Perception ; Perceptions ; Preferences ; Publishing industry ; Ratings ; Science history ; Sex Characteristics ; Sexual dimorphism ; Social Sciences ; Studies ; Symmetry ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>PloS one, 2019-11, Vol.14 (11), p.e0225549</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2019 Public Library of Science</rights><rights>2019 Kočnar et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>2019 Kočnar et al 2019 Kočnar et al</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-3fa19dfa0a1c1b9d9c4befa2bee6e79e865eced033c0fbbe7ba13d934d8d93603</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-3fa19dfa0a1c1b9d9c4befa2bee6e79e865eced033c0fbbe7ba13d934d8d93603</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-6724-0389</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6872208/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6872208/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,315,729,782,786,866,887,2106,2932,23875,27933,27934,53800,53802</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31751432$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Sorokowski, Piotr</contributor><creatorcontrib>Kočnar, Tomáš</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Saribay, S Adil</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kleisner, Karel</creatorcontrib><title>Perceived attractiveness of Czech faces across 10 cultures: Associations with sexual shape dimorphism, averageness, fluctuating asymmetry, and eye color</title><title>PloS one</title><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><description>Research on the perception of faces typically assumes that there are some universal values of attractiveness which are shared across individuals and cultures. The perception of attractiveness may, however, vary across cultures due to local differences in both facial morphology and standards of beauty. To examine cross-cultural consensus in the ratings of attractiveness, we presented a set of 120 non-manipulated photographs of Czech faces to ten samples of raters from both European (Czech Republic, Estonia, Sweden, Romania, Turkey, Portugal) and non-European countries (Brazil, India, Cameroon, Namibia). We examined the relative contribution of three facial markers (sexual shape dimorphism, averageness, fluctuating asymmetry) to the perception of attractiveness as well as the possible influence of eye color, which is a locally specific trait. In general, we found that both male and female faces which were closer to the average and more feminine in shape were regarded as more attractive, while fluctuating asymmetry had no effect. Despite a high cross-cultural consensus on attractiveness standards, significant differences in the perception of attractiveness seem to be related to the level of socio-economic development (as measured by the Human Development Index, HDI). Attractiveness ratings by raters from low-HDI countries (India, Cameroon, Namibia) converged less with ratings from Czech Republic than ratings from high-HDI countries (European countries and Brazil). With respect to eye color, some local patterns emerged which we discuss as a consequence of negative frequency-dependent selection.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Africa</subject><subject>Asymmetry</subject><subject>Attraction</subject><subject>Biology and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Brazil</subject><subject>Color</subject><subject>Color vision</subject><subject>Cross-Cultural Comparison</subject><subject>Czech Republic</subject><subject>Economic development</subject><subject>Europe</subject><subject>Eye Color</subject><subject>Face - anatomy &amp; histology</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Feminine beauty (Aesthetics)</subject><subject>Femininity</subject><subject>Fluctuating asymmetry</subject><subject>Frequency dependence</subject><subject>Genetic engineering</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Hypotheses</subject><subject>India</subject><subject>Internet access</subject><subject>Masculinity</subject><subject>Medicine and Health Sciences</subject><subject>Morphology</subject><subject>People and Places</subject><subject>Perception</subject><subject>Perceptions</subject><subject>Preferences</subject><subject>Publishing industry</subject><subject>Ratings</subject><subject>Science history</subject><subject>Sex Characteristics</subject><subject>Sexual dimorphism</subject><subject>Social Sciences</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Symmetry</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>1932-6203</issn><issn>1932-6203</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNqNk9tq3DAQhk1padK0b1BaQaG0kN1Kli3bvSiE0EMgkNLTrRjLo7WCbG0lOc32Sfq41W42IVtyUQTWMP7-39ZoJsueMjpnvGJvzt3kR7DzpRtxTvO8LIvmXrbPGp7PRE75_VvxXvYohHNKS14L8TDb46wqWcHz_ezPZ_QKzQV2BGL0oGKKRwyBOE2Of6PqiQaFgYDyLmUZJWqycfIY3pKjEJwyEI0bA_llYk8CXk5gSehhiaQzg_PL3oThkMAFelhsnA-JtpOKU9KNCwJhNQwY_SoxY0dwhUQ56_zj7IEGG_DJdj_Ivn94_-340-z07OPJ8dHpTIkmjzOugTWdBgpMsbbpGlW0qCFvEQVWDdaiRIUd5VxR3bZYtcB41_Ciq9NTUH6QPb_yXVoX5LaoQeaciaoWlBaJOLkiOgfncunNAH4lHRi5STi_kOCjURZlKaBpWtbossYi1wIoBc0oKtXlooU2eb3bfm1qB-wUjqnmdsd0981oerlwF1LUVZ7TOhm82hp493PCEOVggkJrYUQ3bf67KmvepKs_yF78g959ui21gHQAM2q37oK1qTwSVBRcFLRK1PwOKq0OB6NSB2qT8juC1zuCxES8jAuYQpAnX7_8P3v2Y5d9eYvtEWzsg7PTpgd3weIK3PStR31TZEbleoCuqyHXAyS3A5Rkz25f0I3oemL4X906Gk4</recordid><startdate>20191121</startdate><enddate>20191121</enddate><creator>Kočnar, Tomáš</creator><creator>Saribay, S Adil</creator><creator>Kleisner, Karel</creator><general>Public Library of Science</general><general>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>IOV</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6724-0389</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20191121</creationdate><title>Perceived attractiveness of Czech faces across 10 cultures: Associations with sexual shape dimorphism, averageness, fluctuating asymmetry, and eye color</title><author>Kočnar, Tomáš ; Saribay, S Adil ; Kleisner, Karel</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-3fa19dfa0a1c1b9d9c4befa2bee6e79e865eced033c0fbbe7ba13d934d8d93603</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Africa</topic><topic>Asymmetry</topic><topic>Attraction</topic><topic>Biology and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Brazil</topic><topic>Color</topic><topic>Color vision</topic><topic>Cross-Cultural Comparison</topic><topic>Czech Republic</topic><topic>Economic development</topic><topic>Europe</topic><topic>Eye Color</topic><topic>Face - anatomy &amp; histology</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Feminine beauty (Aesthetics)</topic><topic>Femininity</topic><topic>Fluctuating asymmetry</topic><topic>Frequency dependence</topic><topic>Genetic engineering</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Hypotheses</topic><topic>India</topic><topic>Internet access</topic><topic>Masculinity</topic><topic>Medicine and Health Sciences</topic><topic>Morphology</topic><topic>People and Places</topic><topic>Perception</topic><topic>Perceptions</topic><topic>Preferences</topic><topic>Publishing industry</topic><topic>Ratings</topic><topic>Science history</topic><topic>Sex Characteristics</topic><topic>Sexual dimorphism</topic><topic>Social Sciences</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Symmetry</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kočnar, Tomáš</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Saribay, S Adil</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kleisner, Karel</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Opposing Viewpoints</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Materials Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>Access via ProQuest (Open Access)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kočnar, Tomáš</au><au>Saribay, S Adil</au><au>Kleisner, Karel</au><au>Sorokowski, Piotr</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Perceived attractiveness of Czech faces across 10 cultures: Associations with sexual shape dimorphism, averageness, fluctuating asymmetry, and eye color</atitle><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><date>2019-11-21</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>14</volume><issue>11</issue><spage>e0225549</spage><pages>e0225549-</pages><issn>1932-6203</issn><eissn>1932-6203</eissn><abstract>Research on the perception of faces typically assumes that there are some universal values of attractiveness which are shared across individuals and cultures. The perception of attractiveness may, however, vary across cultures due to local differences in both facial morphology and standards of beauty. To examine cross-cultural consensus in the ratings of attractiveness, we presented a set of 120 non-manipulated photographs of Czech faces to ten samples of raters from both European (Czech Republic, Estonia, Sweden, Romania, Turkey, Portugal) and non-European countries (Brazil, India, Cameroon, Namibia). We examined the relative contribution of three facial markers (sexual shape dimorphism, averageness, fluctuating asymmetry) to the perception of attractiveness as well as the possible influence of eye color, which is a locally specific trait. In general, we found that both male and female faces which were closer to the average and more feminine in shape were regarded as more attractive, while fluctuating asymmetry had no effect. Despite a high cross-cultural consensus on attractiveness standards, significant differences in the perception of attractiveness seem to be related to the level of socio-economic development (as measured by the Human Development Index, HDI). Attractiveness ratings by raters from low-HDI countries (India, Cameroon, Namibia) converged less with ratings from Czech Republic than ratings from high-HDI countries (European countries and Brazil). With respect to eye color, some local patterns emerged which we discuss as a consequence of negative frequency-dependent selection.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Public Library of Science</pub><pmid>31751432</pmid><doi>10.1371/journal.pone.0225549</doi><tpages>e0225549</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6724-0389</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1932-6203
ispartof PloS one, 2019-11, Vol.14 (11), p.e0225549
issn 1932-6203
1932-6203
language eng
recordid cdi_plos_journals_2316786004
source Public Library of Science (PLoS) Journals Open Access; MEDLINE; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central; Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry
subjects Adult
Africa
Asymmetry
Attraction
Biology and Life Sciences
Brazil
Color
Color vision
Cross-Cultural Comparison
Czech Republic
Economic development
Europe
Eye Color
Face - anatomy & histology
Female
Feminine beauty (Aesthetics)
Femininity
Fluctuating asymmetry
Frequency dependence
Genetic engineering
Humans
Hypotheses
India
Internet access
Masculinity
Medicine and Health Sciences
Morphology
People and Places
Perception
Perceptions
Preferences
Publishing industry
Ratings
Science history
Sex Characteristics
Sexual dimorphism
Social Sciences
Studies
Symmetry
Young Adult
title Perceived attractiveness of Czech faces across 10 cultures: Associations with sexual shape dimorphism, averageness, fluctuating asymmetry, and eye color
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-11-29T10%3A40%3A10IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_plos_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Perceived%20attractiveness%20of%20Czech%20faces%20across%2010%20cultures:%20Associations%20with%20sexual%20shape%20dimorphism,%20averageness,%20fluctuating%20asymmetry,%20and%20eye%20color&rft.jtitle=PloS%20one&rft.au=Ko%C4%8Dnar,%20Tom%C3%A1%C5%A1&rft.date=2019-11-21&rft.volume=14&rft.issue=11&rft.spage=e0225549&rft.pages=e0225549-&rft.issn=1932-6203&rft.eissn=1932-6203&rft_id=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0225549&rft_dat=%3Cgale_plos_%3EA606436407%3C/gale_plos_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2316786004&rft_id=info:pmid/31751432&rft_galeid=A606436407&rft_doaj_id=oai_doaj_org_article_56a99b19f58e42f6a00af10eccd26bab&rfr_iscdi=true