Thermostat wars? The roles of gender and thermal comfort negotiations in household energy use behavior

Although advanced thermostat technologies offer energy efficiency potential, these devices alone do not guarantee savings. Household occupants often deviate from thermostat programs, perhaps due to differing thermal comfort preferences, which are strong drivers of residential energy use and vary acr...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:PloS one 2019-11, Vol.14 (11), p.e0224198-e0224198
Hauptverfasser: Sintov, Nicole D, White, Lee V, Walpole, Hugh
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page e0224198
container_issue 11
container_start_page e0224198
container_title PloS one
container_volume 14
creator Sintov, Nicole D
White, Lee V
Walpole, Hugh
description Although advanced thermostat technologies offer energy efficiency potential, these devices alone do not guarantee savings. Household occupants often deviate from thermostat programs, perhaps due to differing thermal comfort preferences, which are strong drivers of residential energy use and vary across genders. This study aims to develop an initial typology of interpersonal interactions around thermal comfort, explore the role of gender in such interactions, and examine the impacts of interactions on thermostat adjustments. Using n = 1568 diary observations collected from 112 participants, we identify three interaction types: conflicts, compromises, and agreements. Fixed effects analyses find that women are marginally more likely to report engaging in conflicts, whereas men are significantly more likely to report engaging in agreements and compromises, both of which are associated with greater likelihood of adjusting thermostats within a given day. This work represents an early step in investigating the multiply determined nature of household energy decisions.
doi_str_mv 10.1371/journal.pone.0224198
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_plos_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_plos_journals_2314311139</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A605688438</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_6b1edf1116ee45fbaf30f7d959ea5088</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A605688438</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-4bca4c31443386a88e44500afe45063cd82c5d8c1da64bfdbb55a0ab50202fd73</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNk99v0zAQxyMEYmPwHyCwhITgocWO49R5AU0TPypNmgSDV-tin5NMadzZ7mD_PW6bTQ3aA8qD4_Pnvnc-32XZS0bnjC_Yhyu38QP087UbcE7zvGCVfJQds4rnszKn_PHB_1H2LIQrSgWXZfk0O-JskbNFWR1n9rJFv3IhQiS_wYdPJBmIdz0G4ixpcDDoCQyGxC0IPdFuZZ2PZMDGxQ5i54ZAuoG0bhOwdb0hOKBvbknakhpbuOmcf549sdAHfDGuJ9nPL58vz77Nzi--Ls9Oz2e6rPI4K2oNheasKHjKFKTEohCUgsW0lFwbmWthpGYGyqK2pq6FAAq1oDnNrVnwk-z1Xnfdu6DGEgWVJ0nOGONVIpZ7wji4UmvfrcDfKged2hmcbxT42OkeVVkzNDa5lZji2xosp3ZhKlEhCCpl0vo4RtvUKzQah-ihn4hOT4auVY27UaUUPJfbZN6NAt5dbzBEteqCxr6HAVM5d3kLkUsmEvrmH_Th241UA-kC3WBdiqu3ouq0pKKUsuDbvOcPUOkzuOp06ifbJfvE4f3EITER_8QGNiGo5Y_v_89e_Jqybw_YFqGPbXD9ZtdUU7DYg9q7EDza-yIzqrbjcFcNtR0HNY5Dcnt1-ED3Tnf9z_8CJ4kGQw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2314311139</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Thermostat wars? The roles of gender and thermal comfort negotiations in household energy use behavior</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry</source><source>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</source><creator>Sintov, Nicole D ; White, Lee V ; Walpole, Hugh</creator><creatorcontrib>Sintov, Nicole D ; White, Lee V ; Walpole, Hugh</creatorcontrib><description>Although advanced thermostat technologies offer energy efficiency potential, these devices alone do not guarantee savings. Household occupants often deviate from thermostat programs, perhaps due to differing thermal comfort preferences, which are strong drivers of residential energy use and vary across genders. This study aims to develop an initial typology of interpersonal interactions around thermal comfort, explore the role of gender in such interactions, and examine the impacts of interactions on thermostat adjustments. Using n = 1568 diary observations collected from 112 participants, we identify three interaction types: conflicts, compromises, and agreements. Fixed effects analyses find that women are marginally more likely to report engaging in conflicts, whereas men are significantly more likely to report engaging in agreements and compromises, both of which are associated with greater likelihood of adjusting thermostats within a given day. This work represents an early step in investigating the multiply determined nature of household energy decisions.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0224198</identifier><identifier>PMID: 31721769</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Public Library of Science</publisher><subject>Adult ; Analysis ; Behavior ; Biology and Life Sciences ; Computer and Information Sciences ; Diaries ; Energy conservation ; Energy consumption ; Energy efficiency ; Energy management ; Energy use ; Engineering and Technology ; Family Characteristics ; Female ; Gender differences ; Gender Identity ; Households ; Housing ; Humans ; Internet ; Interpersonal Relations ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Motor vehicle drivers ; Natural resources ; Negotiating ; Negotiations ; Physiology ; Research and Analysis Methods ; Researchers ; Residential energy ; Sex Factors ; Smart grid technology ; Social Sciences ; Technology ; Temperature ; Thermal comfort ; Thermostats ; Typology ; Women</subject><ispartof>PloS one, 2019-11, Vol.14 (11), p.e0224198-e0224198</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2019 Public Library of Science</rights><rights>2019 Sintov et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>2019 Sintov et al 2019 Sintov et al</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-4bca4c31443386a88e44500afe45063cd82c5d8c1da64bfdbb55a0ab50202fd73</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-4bca4c31443386a88e44500afe45063cd82c5d8c1da64bfdbb55a0ab50202fd73</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-9285-6444</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6853289/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6853289/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,860,881,2096,2915,23845,27901,27902,53766,53768,79343,79344</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31721769$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Sintov, Nicole D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>White, Lee V</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Walpole, Hugh</creatorcontrib><title>Thermostat wars? The roles of gender and thermal comfort negotiations in household energy use behavior</title><title>PloS one</title><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><description>Although advanced thermostat technologies offer energy efficiency potential, these devices alone do not guarantee savings. Household occupants often deviate from thermostat programs, perhaps due to differing thermal comfort preferences, which are strong drivers of residential energy use and vary across genders. This study aims to develop an initial typology of interpersonal interactions around thermal comfort, explore the role of gender in such interactions, and examine the impacts of interactions on thermostat adjustments. Using n = 1568 diary observations collected from 112 participants, we identify three interaction types: conflicts, compromises, and agreements. Fixed effects analyses find that women are marginally more likely to report engaging in conflicts, whereas men are significantly more likely to report engaging in agreements and compromises, both of which are associated with greater likelihood of adjusting thermostats within a given day. This work represents an early step in investigating the multiply determined nature of household energy decisions.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>Behavior</subject><subject>Biology and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Computer and Information Sciences</subject><subject>Diaries</subject><subject>Energy conservation</subject><subject>Energy consumption</subject><subject>Energy efficiency</subject><subject>Energy management</subject><subject>Energy use</subject><subject>Engineering and Technology</subject><subject>Family Characteristics</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Gender differences</subject><subject>Gender Identity</subject><subject>Households</subject><subject>Housing</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Internet</subject><subject>Interpersonal Relations</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Motor vehicle drivers</subject><subject>Natural resources</subject><subject>Negotiating</subject><subject>Negotiations</subject><subject>Physiology</subject><subject>Research and Analysis Methods</subject><subject>Researchers</subject><subject>Residential energy</subject><subject>Sex Factors</subject><subject>Smart grid technology</subject><subject>Social Sciences</subject><subject>Technology</subject><subject>Temperature</subject><subject>Thermal comfort</subject><subject>Thermostats</subject><subject>Typology</subject><subject>Women</subject><issn>1932-6203</issn><issn>1932-6203</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNqNk99v0zAQxyMEYmPwHyCwhITgocWO49R5AU0TPypNmgSDV-tin5NMadzZ7mD_PW6bTQ3aA8qD4_Pnvnc-32XZS0bnjC_Yhyu38QP087UbcE7zvGCVfJQds4rnszKn_PHB_1H2LIQrSgWXZfk0O-JskbNFWR1n9rJFv3IhQiS_wYdPJBmIdz0G4ixpcDDoCQyGxC0IPdFuZZ2PZMDGxQ5i54ZAuoG0bhOwdb0hOKBvbknakhpbuOmcf549sdAHfDGuJ9nPL58vz77Nzi--Ls9Oz2e6rPI4K2oNheasKHjKFKTEohCUgsW0lFwbmWthpGYGyqK2pq6FAAq1oDnNrVnwk-z1Xnfdu6DGEgWVJ0nOGONVIpZ7wji4UmvfrcDfKged2hmcbxT42OkeVVkzNDa5lZji2xosp3ZhKlEhCCpl0vo4RtvUKzQah-ihn4hOT4auVY27UaUUPJfbZN6NAt5dbzBEteqCxr6HAVM5d3kLkUsmEvrmH_Th241UA-kC3WBdiqu3ouq0pKKUsuDbvOcPUOkzuOp06ifbJfvE4f3EITER_8QGNiGo5Y_v_89e_Jqybw_YFqGPbXD9ZtdUU7DYg9q7EDza-yIzqrbjcFcNtR0HNY5Dcnt1-ED3Tnf9z_8CJ4kGQw</recordid><startdate>20191113</startdate><enddate>20191113</enddate><creator>Sintov, Nicole D</creator><creator>White, Lee V</creator><creator>Walpole, Hugh</creator><general>Public Library of Science</general><general>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>IOV</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9285-6444</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20191113</creationdate><title>Thermostat wars? The roles of gender and thermal comfort negotiations in household energy use behavior</title><author>Sintov, Nicole D ; White, Lee V ; Walpole, Hugh</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-4bca4c31443386a88e44500afe45063cd82c5d8c1da64bfdbb55a0ab50202fd73</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>Behavior</topic><topic>Biology and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Computer and Information Sciences</topic><topic>Diaries</topic><topic>Energy conservation</topic><topic>Energy consumption</topic><topic>Energy efficiency</topic><topic>Energy management</topic><topic>Energy use</topic><topic>Engineering and Technology</topic><topic>Family Characteristics</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Gender differences</topic><topic>Gender Identity</topic><topic>Households</topic><topic>Housing</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Internet</topic><topic>Interpersonal Relations</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Motor vehicle drivers</topic><topic>Natural resources</topic><topic>Negotiating</topic><topic>Negotiations</topic><topic>Physiology</topic><topic>Research and Analysis Methods</topic><topic>Researchers</topic><topic>Residential energy</topic><topic>Sex Factors</topic><topic>Smart grid technology</topic><topic>Social Sciences</topic><topic>Technology</topic><topic>Temperature</topic><topic>Thermal comfort</topic><topic>Thermostats</topic><topic>Typology</topic><topic>Women</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sintov, Nicole D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>White, Lee V</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Walpole, Hugh</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Opposing Viewpoints</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Materials Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sintov, Nicole D</au><au>White, Lee V</au><au>Walpole, Hugh</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Thermostat wars? The roles of gender and thermal comfort negotiations in household energy use behavior</atitle><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><date>2019-11-13</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>14</volume><issue>11</issue><spage>e0224198</spage><epage>e0224198</epage><pages>e0224198-e0224198</pages><issn>1932-6203</issn><eissn>1932-6203</eissn><abstract>Although advanced thermostat technologies offer energy efficiency potential, these devices alone do not guarantee savings. Household occupants often deviate from thermostat programs, perhaps due to differing thermal comfort preferences, which are strong drivers of residential energy use and vary across genders. This study aims to develop an initial typology of interpersonal interactions around thermal comfort, explore the role of gender in such interactions, and examine the impacts of interactions on thermostat adjustments. Using n = 1568 diary observations collected from 112 participants, we identify three interaction types: conflicts, compromises, and agreements. Fixed effects analyses find that women are marginally more likely to report engaging in conflicts, whereas men are significantly more likely to report engaging in agreements and compromises, both of which are associated with greater likelihood of adjusting thermostats within a given day. This work represents an early step in investigating the multiply determined nature of household energy decisions.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Public Library of Science</pub><pmid>31721769</pmid><doi>10.1371/journal.pone.0224198</doi><tpages>e0224198</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9285-6444</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1932-6203
ispartof PloS one, 2019-11, Vol.14 (11), p.e0224198-e0224198
issn 1932-6203
1932-6203
language eng
recordid cdi_plos_journals_2314311139
source MEDLINE; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; PubMed Central; Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry; Public Library of Science (PLoS)
subjects Adult
Analysis
Behavior
Biology and Life Sciences
Computer and Information Sciences
Diaries
Energy conservation
Energy consumption
Energy efficiency
Energy management
Energy use
Engineering and Technology
Family Characteristics
Female
Gender differences
Gender Identity
Households
Housing
Humans
Internet
Interpersonal Relations
Male
Middle Aged
Motor vehicle drivers
Natural resources
Negotiating
Negotiations
Physiology
Research and Analysis Methods
Researchers
Residential energy
Sex Factors
Smart grid technology
Social Sciences
Technology
Temperature
Thermal comfort
Thermostats
Typology
Women
title Thermostat wars? The roles of gender and thermal comfort negotiations in household energy use behavior
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-03T00%3A16%3A59IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_plos_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Thermostat%20wars?%20The%20roles%20of%20gender%20and%20thermal%20comfort%20negotiations%20in%20household%20energy%20use%20behavior&rft.jtitle=PloS%20one&rft.au=Sintov,%20Nicole%20D&rft.date=2019-11-13&rft.volume=14&rft.issue=11&rft.spage=e0224198&rft.epage=e0224198&rft.pages=e0224198-e0224198&rft.issn=1932-6203&rft.eissn=1932-6203&rft_id=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0224198&rft_dat=%3Cgale_plos_%3EA605688438%3C/gale_plos_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2314311139&rft_id=info:pmid/31721769&rft_galeid=A605688438&rft_doaj_id=oai_doaj_org_article_6b1edf1116ee45fbaf30f7d959ea5088&rfr_iscdi=true