Scientists' opinions and attitudes towards citizens' understanding of science and their role in public engagement activities

The increasing perception that public communication in science and technology is an important tool to create a knowledge society is encouraging numerous public engagement activities. However, too little is known about scientists' opinions of and attitudes towards the public with whom they inter...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:PloS one 2019-11, Vol.14 (11), p.e0224262-e0224262
Hauptverfasser: Llorente, Carolina, Revuelta, Gema, Carrió, Mar, Porta, Miquel
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page e0224262
container_issue 11
container_start_page e0224262
container_title PloS one
container_volume 14
creator Llorente, Carolina
Revuelta, Gema
Carrió, Mar
Porta, Miquel
description The increasing perception that public communication in science and technology is an important tool to create a knowledge society is encouraging numerous public engagement activities. However, too little is known about scientists' opinions of and attitudes towards the public with whom they interact during these activities, especially in southern European countries such as Spain. If we want to establish an effective dialogue between science and society, we need to be aware of the opinions and perceptions that both parties have of each other. In this study, we address this issue by focusing on 1022 responses to a survey conducted among scientists in Spain to discover their views of the public, and we then compare these responses with data from other national surveys on the public's understanding of science. The results show that approximately 75% of Spanish scientists think that the general public has a serious lack of knowledge and understanding of scientific reasoning, although scientists do recognize that science interests the public (73%). Scientists believe that the public values the scientific profession to a lesser extent than suggested by public surveys: on a scale of 1-5, survey respondents rate their valuation of the scientific profession at 4.22, whereas scientists rate the public's valuation of the profession at 3.12, on average. Significant differences were detected between scientists' perceptions of how citizens are informed about science and what citizens report in surveys. The challenge for the future is to narrow this gap in order to help scientists gain a better understanding of the public and their interests and to make public engagement activities more effective.
doi_str_mv 10.1371/journal.pone.0224262
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_plos_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_plos_journals_2314304955</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A605688436</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_b1003ff2984b433795cde25f5791f67a</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A605688436</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c734t-7bb9cfb273ecd77cbcf6bb5204ba84194510d30f62f7ac4bd3515c4f7a079efc3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNk9tq3DAQhk1padK0b1BaQ6GHi93qYEn2TSGEHgKBQNP2VsjyyKvglbaSnB7ow1fedUK25KIYY0n-_n80I01RPMVoianAby_9GJwalhvvYIkIqQgn94pD3FCy4ATR-7fGB8WjGC8RYrTm_GFxQLEgWPD6sPhzoS24ZGOKr0q_sc56F0vlulKlZNPYQSyT_6FCF0ttk_0NLoOj6yDElDHr-tKbMk4uGrbCtAIbyuAHKK0rN2M7WF2C61UP6xyqVDrZq2wF8XHxwKghwpP5e1R8_fD-y8mnxdn5x9OT47OFFrRKC9G2jTYtERR0J4RuteFtywiqWlVXuKkYRh1FhhMjlK7ajjLMdJUnSDRgND0qnu98N4OPci5clITiiqKqYSwTpzui8-pSboJdq_BLemXldsGHXqqQrB5Athghagxp6qqtKBUN0x0QZphosOFCZa93c7SxXUOnc85BDXum-3-cXcneX0leM0qaaTN4Z6DjqGUADUGrtBXeTKaXIEEk5QLROmtez0GD_z5CTHJto4ZhUA78uMuVMVLjCX3xD3p3RWaqVzlp64zPe9WTqTzmiPG6rijP1PIOKj8drK3ON9PYvL4neLMnyEyCn6lXY4zy9OLz_7Pn3_bZl7fYFaghraIfxjTd532wmosbfIwBzM3BYCSnxrquhpwaS86NlWXPbh_qjei6k-hf_MYfyg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2314304955</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Scientists' opinions and attitudes towards citizens' understanding of science and their role in public engagement activities</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Recercat</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry</source><source>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</source><creator>Llorente, Carolina ; Revuelta, Gema ; Carrió, Mar ; Porta, Miquel</creator><contributor>Olsson, I. Anna S.</contributor><creatorcontrib>Llorente, Carolina ; Revuelta, Gema ; Carrió, Mar ; Porta, Miquel ; Olsson, I. Anna S.</creatorcontrib><description>The increasing perception that public communication in science and technology is an important tool to create a knowledge society is encouraging numerous public engagement activities. However, too little is known about scientists' opinions of and attitudes towards the public with whom they interact during these activities, especially in southern European countries such as Spain. If we want to establish an effective dialogue between science and society, we need to be aware of the opinions and perceptions that both parties have of each other. In this study, we address this issue by focusing on 1022 responses to a survey conducted among scientists in Spain to discover their views of the public, and we then compare these responses with data from other national surveys on the public's understanding of science. The results show that approximately 75% of Spanish scientists think that the general public has a serious lack of knowledge and understanding of scientific reasoning, although scientists do recognize that science interests the public (73%). Scientists believe that the public values the scientific profession to a lesser extent than suggested by public surveys: on a scale of 1-5, survey respondents rate their valuation of the scientific profession at 4.22, whereas scientists rate the public's valuation of the profession at 3.12, on average. Significant differences were detected between scientists' perceptions of how citizens are informed about science and what citizens report in surveys. The challenge for the future is to narrow this gap in order to help scientists gain a better understanding of the public and their interests and to make public engagement activities more effective.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0224262</identifier><identifier>PMID: 31721768</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Public Library of Science</publisher><subject>Attitude ; Attitudes ; Climate change ; Communication ; Comprehension ; Engineering and Technology ; Engineers ; Health sciences ; Humans ; Innovations ; Knowledge ; Market surveys ; Motivation ; People and Places ; Polls &amp; surveys ; Profession ; Professions ; Public Opinion ; Public participation ; Questionnaires ; R&amp;D ; Reasoning ; Research &amp; development ; Research and Analysis Methods ; Research Personnel ; Researchers ; Science and technology ; Science Policy ; Scientists ; Society ; Spain ; Spanish people ; Studies ; Surveys ; Technology ; Valuation</subject><ispartof>PloS one, 2019-11, Vol.14 (11), p.e0224262-e0224262</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2019 Public Library of Science</rights><rights>2019 Llorente et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess © 2019 Llorente et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (&lt;a href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"&gt;http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/&lt;/a&gt;), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. &lt;a href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"&gt;http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/&lt;/a&gt;</rights><rights>2019 Llorente et al 2019 Llorente et al</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c734t-7bb9cfb273ecd77cbcf6bb5204ba84194510d30f62f7ac4bd3515c4f7a079efc3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c734t-7bb9cfb273ecd77cbcf6bb5204ba84194510d30f62f7ac4bd3515c4f7a079efc3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-1786-7108 ; 0000-0002-0701-2026</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6853295/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6853295/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,860,881,2096,2915,23847,26953,27903,27904,53769,53771,79346,79347</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31721768$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Olsson, I. Anna S.</contributor><creatorcontrib>Llorente, Carolina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Revuelta, Gema</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carrió, Mar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Porta, Miquel</creatorcontrib><title>Scientists' opinions and attitudes towards citizens' understanding of science and their role in public engagement activities</title><title>PloS one</title><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><description>The increasing perception that public communication in science and technology is an important tool to create a knowledge society is encouraging numerous public engagement activities. However, too little is known about scientists' opinions of and attitudes towards the public with whom they interact during these activities, especially in southern European countries such as Spain. If we want to establish an effective dialogue between science and society, we need to be aware of the opinions and perceptions that both parties have of each other. In this study, we address this issue by focusing on 1022 responses to a survey conducted among scientists in Spain to discover their views of the public, and we then compare these responses with data from other national surveys on the public's understanding of science. The results show that approximately 75% of Spanish scientists think that the general public has a serious lack of knowledge and understanding of scientific reasoning, although scientists do recognize that science interests the public (73%). Scientists believe that the public values the scientific profession to a lesser extent than suggested by public surveys: on a scale of 1-5, survey respondents rate their valuation of the scientific profession at 4.22, whereas scientists rate the public's valuation of the profession at 3.12, on average. Significant differences were detected between scientists' perceptions of how citizens are informed about science and what citizens report in surveys. The challenge for the future is to narrow this gap in order to help scientists gain a better understanding of the public and their interests and to make public engagement activities more effective.</description><subject>Attitude</subject><subject>Attitudes</subject><subject>Climate change</subject><subject>Communication</subject><subject>Comprehension</subject><subject>Engineering and Technology</subject><subject>Engineers</subject><subject>Health sciences</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Innovations</subject><subject>Knowledge</subject><subject>Market surveys</subject><subject>Motivation</subject><subject>People and Places</subject><subject>Polls &amp; surveys</subject><subject>Profession</subject><subject>Professions</subject><subject>Public Opinion</subject><subject>Public participation</subject><subject>Questionnaires</subject><subject>R&amp;D</subject><subject>Reasoning</subject><subject>Research &amp; development</subject><subject>Research and Analysis Methods</subject><subject>Research Personnel</subject><subject>Researchers</subject><subject>Science and technology</subject><subject>Science Policy</subject><subject>Scientists</subject><subject>Society</subject><subject>Spain</subject><subject>Spanish people</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Surveys</subject><subject>Technology</subject><subject>Valuation</subject><issn>1932-6203</issn><issn>1932-6203</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>XX2</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNqNk9tq3DAQhk1padK0b1BaQ6GHi93qYEn2TSGEHgKBQNP2VsjyyKvglbaSnB7ow1fedUK25KIYY0n-_n80I01RPMVoianAby_9GJwalhvvYIkIqQgn94pD3FCy4ATR-7fGB8WjGC8RYrTm_GFxQLEgWPD6sPhzoS24ZGOKr0q_sc56F0vlulKlZNPYQSyT_6FCF0ttk_0NLoOj6yDElDHr-tKbMk4uGrbCtAIbyuAHKK0rN2M7WF2C61UP6xyqVDrZq2wF8XHxwKghwpP5e1R8_fD-y8mnxdn5x9OT47OFFrRKC9G2jTYtERR0J4RuteFtywiqWlVXuKkYRh1FhhMjlK7ajjLMdJUnSDRgND0qnu98N4OPci5clITiiqKqYSwTpzui8-pSboJdq_BLemXldsGHXqqQrB5Athghagxp6qqtKBUN0x0QZphosOFCZa93c7SxXUOnc85BDXum-3-cXcneX0leM0qaaTN4Z6DjqGUADUGrtBXeTKaXIEEk5QLROmtez0GD_z5CTHJto4ZhUA78uMuVMVLjCX3xD3p3RWaqVzlp64zPe9WTqTzmiPG6rijP1PIOKj8drK3ON9PYvL4neLMnyEyCn6lXY4zy9OLz_7Pn3_bZl7fYFaghraIfxjTd532wmosbfIwBzM3BYCSnxrquhpwaS86NlWXPbh_qjei6k-hf_MYfyg</recordid><startdate>20191113</startdate><enddate>20191113</enddate><creator>Llorente, Carolina</creator><creator>Revuelta, Gema</creator><creator>Carrió, Mar</creator><creator>Porta, Miquel</creator><general>Public Library of Science</general><general>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>IOV</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>XX2</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1786-7108</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0701-2026</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20191113</creationdate><title>Scientists' opinions and attitudes towards citizens' understanding of science and their role in public engagement activities</title><author>Llorente, Carolina ; Revuelta, Gema ; Carrió, Mar ; Porta, Miquel</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c734t-7bb9cfb273ecd77cbcf6bb5204ba84194510d30f62f7ac4bd3515c4f7a079efc3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Attitude</topic><topic>Attitudes</topic><topic>Climate change</topic><topic>Communication</topic><topic>Comprehension</topic><topic>Engineering and Technology</topic><topic>Engineers</topic><topic>Health sciences</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Innovations</topic><topic>Knowledge</topic><topic>Market surveys</topic><topic>Motivation</topic><topic>People and Places</topic><topic>Polls &amp; surveys</topic><topic>Profession</topic><topic>Professions</topic><topic>Public Opinion</topic><topic>Public participation</topic><topic>Questionnaires</topic><topic>R&amp;D</topic><topic>Reasoning</topic><topic>Research &amp; development</topic><topic>Research and Analysis Methods</topic><topic>Research Personnel</topic><topic>Researchers</topic><topic>Science and technology</topic><topic>Science Policy</topic><topic>Scientists</topic><topic>Society</topic><topic>Spain</topic><topic>Spanish people</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Surveys</topic><topic>Technology</topic><topic>Valuation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Llorente, Carolina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Revuelta, Gema</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carrió, Mar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Porta, Miquel</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Opposing Viewpoints</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Materials Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Recercat</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Llorente, Carolina</au><au>Revuelta, Gema</au><au>Carrió, Mar</au><au>Porta, Miquel</au><au>Olsson, I. Anna S.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Scientists' opinions and attitudes towards citizens' understanding of science and their role in public engagement activities</atitle><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><date>2019-11-13</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>14</volume><issue>11</issue><spage>e0224262</spage><epage>e0224262</epage><pages>e0224262-e0224262</pages><issn>1932-6203</issn><eissn>1932-6203</eissn><abstract>The increasing perception that public communication in science and technology is an important tool to create a knowledge society is encouraging numerous public engagement activities. However, too little is known about scientists' opinions of and attitudes towards the public with whom they interact during these activities, especially in southern European countries such as Spain. If we want to establish an effective dialogue between science and society, we need to be aware of the opinions and perceptions that both parties have of each other. In this study, we address this issue by focusing on 1022 responses to a survey conducted among scientists in Spain to discover their views of the public, and we then compare these responses with data from other national surveys on the public's understanding of science. The results show that approximately 75% of Spanish scientists think that the general public has a serious lack of knowledge and understanding of scientific reasoning, although scientists do recognize that science interests the public (73%). Scientists believe that the public values the scientific profession to a lesser extent than suggested by public surveys: on a scale of 1-5, survey respondents rate their valuation of the scientific profession at 4.22, whereas scientists rate the public's valuation of the profession at 3.12, on average. Significant differences were detected between scientists' perceptions of how citizens are informed about science and what citizens report in surveys. The challenge for the future is to narrow this gap in order to help scientists gain a better understanding of the public and their interests and to make public engagement activities more effective.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Public Library of Science</pub><pmid>31721768</pmid><doi>10.1371/journal.pone.0224262</doi><tpages>e0224262</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1786-7108</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0701-2026</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1932-6203
ispartof PloS one, 2019-11, Vol.14 (11), p.e0224262-e0224262
issn 1932-6203
1932-6203
language eng
recordid cdi_plos_journals_2314304955
source MEDLINE; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Recercat; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central; Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry; Public Library of Science (PLoS)
subjects Attitude
Attitudes
Climate change
Communication
Comprehension
Engineering and Technology
Engineers
Health sciences
Humans
Innovations
Knowledge
Market surveys
Motivation
People and Places
Polls & surveys
Profession
Professions
Public Opinion
Public participation
Questionnaires
R&D
Reasoning
Research & development
Research and Analysis Methods
Research Personnel
Researchers
Science and technology
Science Policy
Scientists
Society
Spain
Spanish people
Studies
Surveys
Technology
Valuation
title Scientists' opinions and attitudes towards citizens' understanding of science and their role in public engagement activities
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-27T12%3A02%3A53IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_plos_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Scientists'%20opinions%20and%20attitudes%20towards%20citizens'%20understanding%20of%20science%20and%20their%20role%20in%20public%20engagement%20activities&rft.jtitle=PloS%20one&rft.au=Llorente,%20Carolina&rft.date=2019-11-13&rft.volume=14&rft.issue=11&rft.spage=e0224262&rft.epage=e0224262&rft.pages=e0224262-e0224262&rft.issn=1932-6203&rft.eissn=1932-6203&rft_id=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0224262&rft_dat=%3Cgale_plos_%3EA605688436%3C/gale_plos_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2314304955&rft_id=info:pmid/31721768&rft_galeid=A605688436&rft_doaj_id=oai_doaj_org_article_b1003ff2984b433795cde25f5791f67a&rfr_iscdi=true