Do protection gradients explain patterns in herbivore densities? An example with ungulates in Zambia's Luangwa Valley

Ungulate populations face declines across the globe, and populations are commonly conserved by using protected areas. However, assessing the effectiveness of protected areas in conserving ungulate populations has remained difficult. Using herd size data from four years of line transect surveys and d...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:PloS one 2019-10, Vol.14 (10), p.e0224438-e0224438
Hauptverfasser: Rosenblatt, Elias, Creel, Scott, Schuette, Paul, Becker, Matthew S, Christianson, David, Dröge, Egil, Mweetwa, Thandiwe, Mwape, Henry, Merkle, Johnathan, M'soka, Jassiel, Masonde, Jones, Simpamba, Twakundine
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page e0224438
container_issue 10
container_start_page e0224438
container_title PloS one
container_volume 14
creator Rosenblatt, Elias
Creel, Scott
Schuette, Paul
Becker, Matthew S
Christianson, David
Dröge, Egil
Mweetwa, Thandiwe
Mwape, Henry
Merkle, Johnathan
M'soka, Jassiel
Masonde, Jones
Simpamba, Twakundine
description Ungulate populations face declines across the globe, and populations are commonly conserved by using protected areas. However, assessing the effectiveness of protected areas in conserving ungulate populations has remained difficult. Using herd size data from four years of line transect surveys and distance sampling models, we modeled population densities of four important herbivore species across a gradient of protection on the edge of Zambia's South Luangwa National Park (SLNP) while accounting for the role of various ecological and anthropogenic variables. Our goal was to test whether protection was responsible for density dynamics in this protection gradient, and whether a hunting moratorium impacted herbivore densities during the studies. For all four species, we estimated lower densities in partially protected buffer areas adjacent to SLNP (ranging from 4.5-fold to 13.2-fold lower) compared to protected parklands. Density trends through the study period were species-specific, with some species increasing, decreasing, or remaining stable in all or some regions of the protection gradient. Surprisingly, when controlling for other covariates, we found that these observed differences were not always detectably related to the level of protection or year. Our findings highlight the importance of accounting for variables beyond strata of interest in evaluating the effectiveness of a protected area. This study highlights the importance of comprehensively modeling ungulate population density across protection gradients, identifies lands within an important protection gradient for targeted conservation and monitoring, documents prey depletion and expands our understanding on the drivers in a critical buffer area in Zambia.
doi_str_mv 10.1371/journal.pone.0224438
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_plos_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_plos_journals_2310637344</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A604275427</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_7a282cbbe17d4aa5bd104267c98198d9</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A604275427</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-79ee00219265637b74b72bbd71643e18ed70dd45f80c8c5fe961cd4b6bfcca063</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNk0uL2zAUhU1p6UzT_oPSGgp9LJJKsi3Zm5YwfQUCA33MohshS9eOBkVyJXke_77KJDMkZRbFGAvpO0dXx7pZ9hyjGS4Yfn_uRm-FmQ3OwgwRUpZF_SA7xk1BppSg4uHe-Ch7EsI5QlVRU_o4OyowpRWm-DgbP7l88C6CjNrZvPdCabAx5HA1GKFtPogYwduQp_EKfKsvnIdcgQ06aggf87lNrFgPBvJLHVf5aPvRiAg3it9i3WrxJuTLUdj-UuRnwhi4fpo96oQJ8Gz3nWS_vnz-efJtujz9ujiZL6eSNiROWQOAEMENoRUtWMvKlpG2VQzTsgBcg2JIqbLqaiRrWXXQUCxV2dK2k1IgWkyyl1vfwbjAd4kFTgqcFlmRIptkiy2hnDjng9dr4a-5E5rfTDjfc-GjlgY4E6Qmsm0BM1UKUbUKo5JQJpsaN7VqkteH3W5juwYlU45emAPTwxWrV7x3F5zWBKNmU-7bnYF3f0YIka91kGCMsODGbd0MN6hECX31D3r_6XZUL9IBtO1c2lduTPmcpuJZld5Eze6h0qNgrWW6Xp1O8weCdweCxES4ir0YQ-CLH9__nz09O2Rf77ErECaugjPj5mqGQ7DcgtK7EDx0dyFjxDfdcZsG33QH33VHkr3Y_0F3ott2KP4Crr0K9g</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2310637344</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Do protection gradients explain patterns in herbivore densities? An example with ungulates in Zambia's Luangwa Valley</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry</source><source>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</source><creator>Rosenblatt, Elias ; Creel, Scott ; Schuette, Paul ; Becker, Matthew S ; Christianson, David ; Dröge, Egil ; Mweetwa, Thandiwe ; Mwape, Henry ; Merkle, Johnathan ; M'soka, Jassiel ; Masonde, Jones ; Simpamba, Twakundine</creator><creatorcontrib>Rosenblatt, Elias ; Creel, Scott ; Schuette, Paul ; Becker, Matthew S ; Christianson, David ; Dröge, Egil ; Mweetwa, Thandiwe ; Mwape, Henry ; Merkle, Johnathan ; M'soka, Jassiel ; Masonde, Jones ; Simpamba, Twakundine</creatorcontrib><description>Ungulate populations face declines across the globe, and populations are commonly conserved by using protected areas. However, assessing the effectiveness of protected areas in conserving ungulate populations has remained difficult. Using herd size data from four years of line transect surveys and distance sampling models, we modeled population densities of four important herbivore species across a gradient of protection on the edge of Zambia's South Luangwa National Park (SLNP) while accounting for the role of various ecological and anthropogenic variables. Our goal was to test whether protection was responsible for density dynamics in this protection gradient, and whether a hunting moratorium impacted herbivore densities during the studies. For all four species, we estimated lower densities in partially protected buffer areas adjacent to SLNP (ranging from 4.5-fold to 13.2-fold lower) compared to protected parklands. Density trends through the study period were species-specific, with some species increasing, decreasing, or remaining stable in all or some regions of the protection gradient. Surprisingly, when controlling for other covariates, we found that these observed differences were not always detectably related to the level of protection or year. Our findings highlight the importance of accounting for variables beyond strata of interest in evaluating the effectiveness of a protected area. This study highlights the importance of comprehensively modeling ungulate population density across protection gradients, identifies lands within an important protection gradient for targeted conservation and monitoring, documents prey depletion and expands our understanding on the drivers in a critical buffer area in Zambia.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0224438</identifier><identifier>PMID: 31665161</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Public Library of Science</publisher><subject>Accounting ; Animals ; Antelopes ; Anthropogenic factors ; Biology and Life Sciences ; Buffers ; Conservation ; Conservation of Natural Resources ; Data analysis ; Depletion ; Earth Sciences ; Ecology ; Ecology and Environmental Sciences ; Ecosystem ; Equidae ; Female ; Herbivores ; Herbivory ; Hunting ; Male ; Mammals ; National parks ; Natural resources ; Parks ; Parks &amp; recreation areas ; Perissodactyla ; Population Density ; Prey ; Protected areas ; Spatial data ; Species ; Swine ; Trends ; Ungulates ; Wildlife conservation ; Zambia</subject><ispartof>PloS one, 2019-10, Vol.14 (10), p.e0224438-e0224438</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2019 Public Library of Science</rights><rights>2019 Rosenblatt et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>2019 Rosenblatt et al 2019 Rosenblatt et al</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-79ee00219265637b74b72bbd71643e18ed70dd45f80c8c5fe961cd4b6bfcca063</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-79ee00219265637b74b72bbd71643e18ed70dd45f80c8c5fe961cd4b6bfcca063</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-7241-2109</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6821096/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6821096/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,860,881,2096,2915,23845,27901,27902,53766,53768,79342,79343</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31665161$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Rosenblatt, Elias</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Creel, Scott</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schuette, Paul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Becker, Matthew S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Christianson, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dröge, Egil</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mweetwa, Thandiwe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mwape, Henry</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Merkle, Johnathan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>M'soka, Jassiel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Masonde, Jones</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Simpamba, Twakundine</creatorcontrib><title>Do protection gradients explain patterns in herbivore densities? An example with ungulates in Zambia's Luangwa Valley</title><title>PloS one</title><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><description>Ungulate populations face declines across the globe, and populations are commonly conserved by using protected areas. However, assessing the effectiveness of protected areas in conserving ungulate populations has remained difficult. Using herd size data from four years of line transect surveys and distance sampling models, we modeled population densities of four important herbivore species across a gradient of protection on the edge of Zambia's South Luangwa National Park (SLNP) while accounting for the role of various ecological and anthropogenic variables. Our goal was to test whether protection was responsible for density dynamics in this protection gradient, and whether a hunting moratorium impacted herbivore densities during the studies. For all four species, we estimated lower densities in partially protected buffer areas adjacent to SLNP (ranging from 4.5-fold to 13.2-fold lower) compared to protected parklands. Density trends through the study period were species-specific, with some species increasing, decreasing, or remaining stable in all or some regions of the protection gradient. Surprisingly, when controlling for other covariates, we found that these observed differences were not always detectably related to the level of protection or year. Our findings highlight the importance of accounting for variables beyond strata of interest in evaluating the effectiveness of a protected area. This study highlights the importance of comprehensively modeling ungulate population density across protection gradients, identifies lands within an important protection gradient for targeted conservation and monitoring, documents prey depletion and expands our understanding on the drivers in a critical buffer area in Zambia.</description><subject>Accounting</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Antelopes</subject><subject>Anthropogenic factors</subject><subject>Biology and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Buffers</subject><subject>Conservation</subject><subject>Conservation of Natural Resources</subject><subject>Data analysis</subject><subject>Depletion</subject><subject>Earth Sciences</subject><subject>Ecology</subject><subject>Ecology and Environmental Sciences</subject><subject>Ecosystem</subject><subject>Equidae</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Herbivores</subject><subject>Herbivory</subject><subject>Hunting</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Mammals</subject><subject>National parks</subject><subject>Natural resources</subject><subject>Parks</subject><subject>Parks &amp; recreation areas</subject><subject>Perissodactyla</subject><subject>Population Density</subject><subject>Prey</subject><subject>Protected areas</subject><subject>Spatial data</subject><subject>Species</subject><subject>Swine</subject><subject>Trends</subject><subject>Ungulates</subject><subject>Wildlife conservation</subject><subject>Zambia</subject><issn>1932-6203</issn><issn>1932-6203</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNqNk0uL2zAUhU1p6UzT_oPSGgp9LJJKsi3Zm5YwfQUCA33MohshS9eOBkVyJXke_77KJDMkZRbFGAvpO0dXx7pZ9hyjGS4Yfn_uRm-FmQ3OwgwRUpZF_SA7xk1BppSg4uHe-Ch7EsI5QlVRU_o4OyowpRWm-DgbP7l88C6CjNrZvPdCabAx5HA1GKFtPogYwduQp_EKfKsvnIdcgQ06aggf87lNrFgPBvJLHVf5aPvRiAg3it9i3WrxJuTLUdj-UuRnwhi4fpo96oQJ8Gz3nWS_vnz-efJtujz9ujiZL6eSNiROWQOAEMENoRUtWMvKlpG2VQzTsgBcg2JIqbLqaiRrWXXQUCxV2dK2k1IgWkyyl1vfwbjAd4kFTgqcFlmRIptkiy2hnDjng9dr4a-5E5rfTDjfc-GjlgY4E6Qmsm0BM1UKUbUKo5JQJpsaN7VqkteH3W5juwYlU45emAPTwxWrV7x3F5zWBKNmU-7bnYF3f0YIka91kGCMsODGbd0MN6hECX31D3r_6XZUL9IBtO1c2lduTPmcpuJZld5Eze6h0qNgrWW6Xp1O8weCdweCxES4ir0YQ-CLH9__nz09O2Rf77ErECaugjPj5mqGQ7DcgtK7EDx0dyFjxDfdcZsG33QH33VHkr3Y_0F3ott2KP4Crr0K9g</recordid><startdate>20191030</startdate><enddate>20191030</enddate><creator>Rosenblatt, Elias</creator><creator>Creel, Scott</creator><creator>Schuette, Paul</creator><creator>Becker, Matthew S</creator><creator>Christianson, David</creator><creator>Dröge, Egil</creator><creator>Mweetwa, Thandiwe</creator><creator>Mwape, Henry</creator><creator>Merkle, Johnathan</creator><creator>M'soka, Jassiel</creator><creator>Masonde, Jones</creator><creator>Simpamba, Twakundine</creator><general>Public Library of Science</general><general>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>IOV</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7241-2109</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20191030</creationdate><title>Do protection gradients explain patterns in herbivore densities? An example with ungulates in Zambia's Luangwa Valley</title><author>Rosenblatt, Elias ; Creel, Scott ; Schuette, Paul ; Becker, Matthew S ; Christianson, David ; Dröge, Egil ; Mweetwa, Thandiwe ; Mwape, Henry ; Merkle, Johnathan ; M'soka, Jassiel ; Masonde, Jones ; Simpamba, Twakundine</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-79ee00219265637b74b72bbd71643e18ed70dd45f80c8c5fe961cd4b6bfcca063</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Accounting</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Antelopes</topic><topic>Anthropogenic factors</topic><topic>Biology and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Buffers</topic><topic>Conservation</topic><topic>Conservation of Natural Resources</topic><topic>Data analysis</topic><topic>Depletion</topic><topic>Earth Sciences</topic><topic>Ecology</topic><topic>Ecology and Environmental Sciences</topic><topic>Ecosystem</topic><topic>Equidae</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Herbivores</topic><topic>Herbivory</topic><topic>Hunting</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Mammals</topic><topic>National parks</topic><topic>Natural resources</topic><topic>Parks</topic><topic>Parks &amp; recreation areas</topic><topic>Perissodactyla</topic><topic>Population Density</topic><topic>Prey</topic><topic>Protected areas</topic><topic>Spatial data</topic><topic>Species</topic><topic>Swine</topic><topic>Trends</topic><topic>Ungulates</topic><topic>Wildlife conservation</topic><topic>Zambia</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Rosenblatt, Elias</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Creel, Scott</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schuette, Paul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Becker, Matthew S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Christianson, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dröge, Egil</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mweetwa, Thandiwe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mwape, Henry</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Merkle, Johnathan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>M'soka, Jassiel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Masonde, Jones</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Simpamba, Twakundine</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Opposing Viewpoints</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Materials Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Rosenblatt, Elias</au><au>Creel, Scott</au><au>Schuette, Paul</au><au>Becker, Matthew S</au><au>Christianson, David</au><au>Dröge, Egil</au><au>Mweetwa, Thandiwe</au><au>Mwape, Henry</au><au>Merkle, Johnathan</au><au>M'soka, Jassiel</au><au>Masonde, Jones</au><au>Simpamba, Twakundine</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Do protection gradients explain patterns in herbivore densities? An example with ungulates in Zambia's Luangwa Valley</atitle><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><date>2019-10-30</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>14</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>e0224438</spage><epage>e0224438</epage><pages>e0224438-e0224438</pages><issn>1932-6203</issn><eissn>1932-6203</eissn><abstract>Ungulate populations face declines across the globe, and populations are commonly conserved by using protected areas. However, assessing the effectiveness of protected areas in conserving ungulate populations has remained difficult. Using herd size data from four years of line transect surveys and distance sampling models, we modeled population densities of four important herbivore species across a gradient of protection on the edge of Zambia's South Luangwa National Park (SLNP) while accounting for the role of various ecological and anthropogenic variables. Our goal was to test whether protection was responsible for density dynamics in this protection gradient, and whether a hunting moratorium impacted herbivore densities during the studies. For all four species, we estimated lower densities in partially protected buffer areas adjacent to SLNP (ranging from 4.5-fold to 13.2-fold lower) compared to protected parklands. Density trends through the study period were species-specific, with some species increasing, decreasing, or remaining stable in all or some regions of the protection gradient. Surprisingly, when controlling for other covariates, we found that these observed differences were not always detectably related to the level of protection or year. Our findings highlight the importance of accounting for variables beyond strata of interest in evaluating the effectiveness of a protected area. This study highlights the importance of comprehensively modeling ungulate population density across protection gradients, identifies lands within an important protection gradient for targeted conservation and monitoring, documents prey depletion and expands our understanding on the drivers in a critical buffer area in Zambia.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Public Library of Science</pub><pmid>31665161</pmid><doi>10.1371/journal.pone.0224438</doi><tpages>e0224438</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7241-2109</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1932-6203
ispartof PloS one, 2019-10, Vol.14 (10), p.e0224438-e0224438
issn 1932-6203
1932-6203
language eng
recordid cdi_plos_journals_2310637344
source MEDLINE; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; PubMed Central; Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry; Public Library of Science (PLoS)
subjects Accounting
Animals
Antelopes
Anthropogenic factors
Biology and Life Sciences
Buffers
Conservation
Conservation of Natural Resources
Data analysis
Depletion
Earth Sciences
Ecology
Ecology and Environmental Sciences
Ecosystem
Equidae
Female
Herbivores
Herbivory
Hunting
Male
Mammals
National parks
Natural resources
Parks
Parks & recreation areas
Perissodactyla
Population Density
Prey
Protected areas
Spatial data
Species
Swine
Trends
Ungulates
Wildlife conservation
Zambia
title Do protection gradients explain patterns in herbivore densities? An example with ungulates in Zambia's Luangwa Valley
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-05T17%3A16%3A14IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_plos_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Do%20protection%20gradients%20explain%20patterns%20in%20herbivore%20densities?%20An%20example%20with%20ungulates%20in%20Zambia's%20Luangwa%20Valley&rft.jtitle=PloS%20one&rft.au=Rosenblatt,%20Elias&rft.date=2019-10-30&rft.volume=14&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=e0224438&rft.epage=e0224438&rft.pages=e0224438-e0224438&rft.issn=1932-6203&rft.eissn=1932-6203&rft_id=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0224438&rft_dat=%3Cgale_plos_%3EA604275427%3C/gale_plos_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2310637344&rft_id=info:pmid/31665161&rft_galeid=A604275427&rft_doaj_id=oai_doaj_org_article_7a282cbbe17d4aa5bd104267c98198d9&rfr_iscdi=true