Moral grandstanding in public discourse: Status-seeking motives as a potential explanatory mechanism in predicting conflict
Public discourse is often caustic and conflict-filled. This trend seems to be particularly evident when the content of such discourse is around moral issues (broadly defined) and when the discourse occurs on social media. Several explanatory mechanisms for such conflict have been explored in recent...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | PloS one 2019-10, Vol.14 (10), p.e0223749-e0223749 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | e0223749 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 10 |
| container_start_page | e0223749 |
| container_title | PloS one |
| container_volume | 14 |
| creator | Grubbs, Joshua B Warmke, Brandon Tosi, Justin James, A Shanti Campbell, W Keith |
| description | Public discourse is often caustic and conflict-filled. This trend seems to be particularly evident when the content of such discourse is around moral issues (broadly defined) and when the discourse occurs on social media. Several explanatory mechanisms for such conflict have been explored in recent psychological and social-science literatures. The present work sought to examine a potentially novel explanatory mechanism defined in philosophical literature: Moral Grandstanding. According to philosophical accounts, Moral Grandstanding is the use of moral talk to seek social status. For the present work, we conducted six studies, using two undergraduate samples (Study 1, N = 361; Study 2, N = 356); a sample matched to U.S. norms for age, gender, race, income, Census region (Study 3, N = 1,063); a YouGov sample matched to U.S. demographic norms (Study 4, N = 2,000); and a brief, one-month longitudinal study of Mechanical Turk workers in the U.S. (Study 5, Baseline N = 499, follow-up n = 296), and a large, one-week YouGov sample matched to U.S. demographic norms (Baseline N = 2,519, follow-up n = 1,776). Across studies, we found initial support for the validity of Moral Grandstanding as a construct. Specifically, moral grandstanding motivation was associated with status-seeking personality traits, as well as greater political and moral conflict in daily life. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1371/journal.pone.0223749 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_plos_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_plos_journals_2306203230</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_502ea96a422a41bd9e6186d90eb60f79</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>2306490605</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c526t-e7e9c66850a991eec9aab6d5fc9da18eb17af6cb1c6ddb23e46e96b4ae82cb2c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptUk1v1DAQjRCItgv_AEEkLr1k8UfixByQUMVHpSIOwNma2JOtlyQOtlNR8edxumnVIiTLY9nvvZl5nix7QcmW8pq-2bvZj9BvJzfiljDG61I-yo6p5KwQjPDH985H2UkIe0Iq3gjxNDviVNCG8eo4-_PFeejznYfRhJg2O-5yO-bT3PZW58YGnfIEfJt_ixDnUATEnwtmcNFeYcghrXxyEcdokxD-nnoYITp_nQ-oL2G0YbgR9GisjgtVu7FL4vFZ9qSDPuDzNW6yHx8_fD_7XFx8_XR-9v6i0BUTscAapRaiqQhISRG1BGiFqTotDdAGW1pDJ3RLtTCmZRxLgVK0JWDDdMs032SvDrpT74JafQuKcbJ4k0JCnB8QxsFeTd4O4K-VA6tuLpzfKfDR6h5VRRiCFFAyBiVtjcRkpTCSYCtIV8uk9W7NNrcDGp2MSQ4_EH34MtpLtXNXStSyKuVSzOkq4N2vGUNUQ_oF7JOv6OZD3Qkn0m9ustf_QP_fXXlAae9C8NjdFUOJWmbplqWWWVLrLCXay_uN3JFuh4f_Bf9Cy9w</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2306203230</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Moral grandstanding in public discourse: Status-seeking motives as a potential explanatory mechanism in predicting conflict</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><source>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry</source><creator>Grubbs, Joshua B ; Warmke, Brandon ; Tosi, Justin ; James, A Shanti ; Campbell, W Keith</creator><contributor>Wetherell, Geoffrey</contributor><creatorcontrib>Grubbs, Joshua B ; Warmke, Brandon ; Tosi, Justin ; James, A Shanti ; Campbell, W Keith ; Wetherell, Geoffrey</creatorcontrib><description>Public discourse is often caustic and conflict-filled. This trend seems to be particularly evident when the content of such discourse is around moral issues (broadly defined) and when the discourse occurs on social media. Several explanatory mechanisms for such conflict have been explored in recent psychological and social-science literatures. The present work sought to examine a potentially novel explanatory mechanism defined in philosophical literature: Moral Grandstanding. According to philosophical accounts, Moral Grandstanding is the use of moral talk to seek social status. For the present work, we conducted six studies, using two undergraduate samples (Study 1, N = 361; Study 2, N = 356); a sample matched to U.S. norms for age, gender, race, income, Census region (Study 3, N = 1,063); a YouGov sample matched to U.S. demographic norms (Study 4, N = 2,000); and a brief, one-month longitudinal study of Mechanical Turk workers in the U.S. (Study 5, Baseline N = 499, follow-up n = 296), and a large, one-week YouGov sample matched to U.S. demographic norms (Baseline N = 2,519, follow-up n = 1,776). Across studies, we found initial support for the validity of Moral Grandstanding as a construct. Specifically, moral grandstanding motivation was associated with status-seeking personality traits, as well as greater political and moral conflict in daily life.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0223749</identifier><identifier>PMID: 31618235</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Public Library of Science</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Authoritarianism ; Behavior ; Biology and Life Sciences ; Computer and Information Sciences ; Conflict ; Correlation analysis ; Demographics ; Digital media ; Discourse ; Emotional abuse ; Empirical Research ; Everyday life ; Female ; Humans ; Internet ; Longitudinal Studies ; Male ; Medicine and Health Sciences ; Moral Status ; Morality ; Motivation ; Narcissism ; Norms ; Personality ; Personality traits ; Philosophy ; Psychology ; Research methodology ; Social classes ; Social conflict ; Social interactions ; Social Media ; Social networks ; Social Sciences ; Social status ; Social Values ; Trends ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>PloS one, 2019-10, Vol.14 (10), p.e0223749-e0223749</ispartof><rights>2019 Grubbs et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>2019 Grubbs et al 2019 Grubbs et al</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c526t-e7e9c66850a991eec9aab6d5fc9da18eb17af6cb1c6ddb23e46e96b4ae82cb2c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c526t-e7e9c66850a991eec9aab6d5fc9da18eb17af6cb1c6ddb23e46e96b4ae82cb2c3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-2642-1351</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6795490/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6795490/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,864,885,2102,2928,23866,27344,27924,27925,33774,53791,53793,79600,79601</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31618235$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Wetherell, Geoffrey</contributor><creatorcontrib>Grubbs, Joshua B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Warmke, Brandon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tosi, Justin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>James, A Shanti</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Campbell, W Keith</creatorcontrib><title>Moral grandstanding in public discourse: Status-seeking motives as a potential explanatory mechanism in predicting conflict</title><title>PloS one</title><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><description>Public discourse is often caustic and conflict-filled. This trend seems to be particularly evident when the content of such discourse is around moral issues (broadly defined) and when the discourse occurs on social media. Several explanatory mechanisms for such conflict have been explored in recent psychological and social-science literatures. The present work sought to examine a potentially novel explanatory mechanism defined in philosophical literature: Moral Grandstanding. According to philosophical accounts, Moral Grandstanding is the use of moral talk to seek social status. For the present work, we conducted six studies, using two undergraduate samples (Study 1, N = 361; Study 2, N = 356); a sample matched to U.S. norms for age, gender, race, income, Census region (Study 3, N = 1,063); a YouGov sample matched to U.S. demographic norms (Study 4, N = 2,000); and a brief, one-month longitudinal study of Mechanical Turk workers in the U.S. (Study 5, Baseline N = 499, follow-up n = 296), and a large, one-week YouGov sample matched to U.S. demographic norms (Baseline N = 2,519, follow-up n = 1,776). Across studies, we found initial support for the validity of Moral Grandstanding as a construct. Specifically, moral grandstanding motivation was associated with status-seeking personality traits, as well as greater political and moral conflict in daily life.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Authoritarianism</subject><subject>Behavior</subject><subject>Biology and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Computer and Information Sciences</subject><subject>Conflict</subject><subject>Correlation analysis</subject><subject>Demographics</subject><subject>Digital media</subject><subject>Discourse</subject><subject>Emotional abuse</subject><subject>Empirical Research</subject><subject>Everyday life</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Internet</subject><subject>Longitudinal Studies</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medicine and Health Sciences</subject><subject>Moral Status</subject><subject>Morality</subject><subject>Motivation</subject><subject>Narcissism</subject><subject>Norms</subject><subject>Personality</subject><subject>Personality traits</subject><subject>Philosophy</subject><subject>Psychology</subject><subject>Research methodology</subject><subject>Social classes</subject><subject>Social conflict</subject><subject>Social interactions</subject><subject>Social Media</subject><subject>Social networks</subject><subject>Social Sciences</subject><subject>Social status</subject><subject>Social Values</subject><subject>Trends</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>1932-6203</issn><issn>1932-6203</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNptUk1v1DAQjRCItgv_AEEkLr1k8UfixByQUMVHpSIOwNma2JOtlyQOtlNR8edxumnVIiTLY9nvvZl5nix7QcmW8pq-2bvZj9BvJzfiljDG61I-yo6p5KwQjPDH985H2UkIe0Iq3gjxNDviVNCG8eo4-_PFeejznYfRhJg2O-5yO-bT3PZW58YGnfIEfJt_ixDnUATEnwtmcNFeYcghrXxyEcdokxD-nnoYITp_nQ-oL2G0YbgR9GisjgtVu7FL4vFZ9qSDPuDzNW6yHx8_fD_7XFx8_XR-9v6i0BUTscAapRaiqQhISRG1BGiFqTotDdAGW1pDJ3RLtTCmZRxLgVK0JWDDdMs032SvDrpT74JafQuKcbJ4k0JCnB8QxsFeTd4O4K-VA6tuLpzfKfDR6h5VRRiCFFAyBiVtjcRkpTCSYCtIV8uk9W7NNrcDGp2MSQ4_EH34MtpLtXNXStSyKuVSzOkq4N2vGUNUQ_oF7JOv6OZD3Qkn0m9ustf_QP_fXXlAae9C8NjdFUOJWmbplqWWWVLrLCXay_uN3JFuh4f_Bf9Cy9w</recordid><startdate>20191016</startdate><enddate>20191016</enddate><creator>Grubbs, Joshua B</creator><creator>Warmke, Brandon</creator><creator>Tosi, Justin</creator><creator>James, A Shanti</creator><creator>Campbell, W Keith</creator><general>Public Library of Science</general><general>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>WZK</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2642-1351</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20191016</creationdate><title>Moral grandstanding in public discourse: Status-seeking motives as a potential explanatory mechanism in predicting conflict</title><author>Grubbs, Joshua B ; Warmke, Brandon ; Tosi, Justin ; James, A Shanti ; Campbell, W Keith</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c526t-e7e9c66850a991eec9aab6d5fc9da18eb17af6cb1c6ddb23e46e96b4ae82cb2c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Authoritarianism</topic><topic>Behavior</topic><topic>Biology and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Computer and Information Sciences</topic><topic>Conflict</topic><topic>Correlation analysis</topic><topic>Demographics</topic><topic>Digital media</topic><topic>Discourse</topic><topic>Emotional abuse</topic><topic>Empirical Research</topic><topic>Everyday life</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Internet</topic><topic>Longitudinal Studies</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medicine and Health Sciences</topic><topic>Moral Status</topic><topic>Morality</topic><topic>Motivation</topic><topic>Narcissism</topic><topic>Norms</topic><topic>Personality</topic><topic>Personality traits</topic><topic>Philosophy</topic><topic>Psychology</topic><topic>Research methodology</topic><topic>Social classes</topic><topic>Social conflict</topic><topic>Social interactions</topic><topic>Social Media</topic><topic>Social networks</topic><topic>Social Sciences</topic><topic>Social status</topic><topic>Social Values</topic><topic>Trends</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Grubbs, Joshua B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Warmke, Brandon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tosi, Justin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>James, A Shanti</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Campbell, W Keith</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Materials Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Grubbs, Joshua B</au><au>Warmke, Brandon</au><au>Tosi, Justin</au><au>James, A Shanti</au><au>Campbell, W Keith</au><au>Wetherell, Geoffrey</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Moral grandstanding in public discourse: Status-seeking motives as a potential explanatory mechanism in predicting conflict</atitle><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><date>2019-10-16</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>14</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>e0223749</spage><epage>e0223749</epage><pages>e0223749-e0223749</pages><issn>1932-6203</issn><eissn>1932-6203</eissn><abstract>Public discourse is often caustic and conflict-filled. This trend seems to be particularly evident when the content of such discourse is around moral issues (broadly defined) and when the discourse occurs on social media. Several explanatory mechanisms for such conflict have been explored in recent psychological and social-science literatures. The present work sought to examine a potentially novel explanatory mechanism defined in philosophical literature: Moral Grandstanding. According to philosophical accounts, Moral Grandstanding is the use of moral talk to seek social status. For the present work, we conducted six studies, using two undergraduate samples (Study 1, N = 361; Study 2, N = 356); a sample matched to U.S. norms for age, gender, race, income, Census region (Study 3, N = 1,063); a YouGov sample matched to U.S. demographic norms (Study 4, N = 2,000); and a brief, one-month longitudinal study of Mechanical Turk workers in the U.S. (Study 5, Baseline N = 499, follow-up n = 296), and a large, one-week YouGov sample matched to U.S. demographic norms (Baseline N = 2,519, follow-up n = 1,776). Across studies, we found initial support for the validity of Moral Grandstanding as a construct. Specifically, moral grandstanding motivation was associated with status-seeking personality traits, as well as greater political and moral conflict in daily life.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Public Library of Science</pub><pmid>31618235</pmid><doi>10.1371/journal.pone.0223749</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2642-1351</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 1932-6203 |
| ispartof | PloS one, 2019-10, Vol.14 (10), p.e0223749-e0223749 |
| issn | 1932-6203 1932-6203 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_plos_journals_2306203230 |
| source | MEDLINE; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Sociological Abstracts; Public Library of Science (PLoS); EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central; Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry |
| subjects | Adolescent Authoritarianism Behavior Biology and Life Sciences Computer and Information Sciences Conflict Correlation analysis Demographics Digital media Discourse Emotional abuse Empirical Research Everyday life Female Humans Internet Longitudinal Studies Male Medicine and Health Sciences Moral Status Morality Motivation Narcissism Norms Personality Personality traits Philosophy Psychology Research methodology Social classes Social conflict Social interactions Social Media Social networks Social Sciences Social status Social Values Trends Young Adult |
| title | Moral grandstanding in public discourse: Status-seeking motives as a potential explanatory mechanism in predicting conflict |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-06T13%3A40%3A19IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_plos_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Moral%20grandstanding%20in%20public%20discourse:%20Status-seeking%20motives%20as%20a%20potential%20explanatory%20mechanism%20in%20predicting%20conflict&rft.jtitle=PloS%20one&rft.au=Grubbs,%20Joshua%20B&rft.date=2019-10-16&rft.volume=14&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=e0223749&rft.epage=e0223749&rft.pages=e0223749-e0223749&rft.issn=1932-6203&rft.eissn=1932-6203&rft_id=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0223749&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_plos_%3E2306490605%3C/proquest_plos_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2306203230&rft_id=info:pmid/31618235&rft_doaj_id=oai_doaj_org_article_502ea96a422a41bd9e6186d90eb60f79&rfr_iscdi=true |