Using DNA barcoding to improve invasive pest identification at U.S. ports-of-entry
Interception of potential invasive species at ports-of-entry is essential for effective biosecurity and biosurveillance programs. However, taxonomic assessment of the immature stages of most arthropods is challenging; characters for identification are often dependent on adult morphology and reproduc...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | PloS one 2019-09, Vol.14 (9), p.e0222291 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | 9 |
container_start_page | e0222291 |
container_title | PloS one |
container_volume | 14 |
creator | Madden, Mary J L Young, Robert G Brown, John W Miller, Scott E Frewin, Andrew J Hanner, Robert H |
description | Interception of potential invasive species at ports-of-entry is essential for effective biosecurity and biosurveillance programs. However, taxonomic assessment of the immature stages of most arthropods is challenging; characters for identification are often dependent on adult morphology and reproductive structures. This study aims to strengthen the identification of such specimens through DNA barcoding, with a focus on microlepidoptera. A sample of 241 primarily immature microlepidoptera specimens intercepted at U.S. ports-of-entry from 2007 to 2011 were selected for analysis. From this sample, 201 COI-5P sequences were generated and analyzed for concordance between morphology-based and DNA-based identifications. The retrospective analysis of the data over 10 years (2009 to 2019) using the Barcode of Life Data (BOLD) system demonstrates the importance of establishing and growing DNA barcode reference libraries for use in specimen identification. Additionally, analysis of specimen identification using public data (43.3% specimens identified) vs. non-public data (78.6% specimens identified) highlights the need to encourage researchers to make data publicly accessible. DNA barcoding surpassed morphological identification with 42.3% (public) and 66.7% (non-public) of the sampled specimens achieving a species-level identification, compared to 38.3% species-level identification by morphology. Whilst DNA barcoding was not able to identify all specimens in our dataset, its incorporation into border security programs as an adjunct to morphological identification can provide secondary lines of evidence and lower taxonomic resolution in many cases. Furthermore, with increased globalization, database records need to be clearly annotated for suspected specimen origin versus interception location. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1371/journal.pone.0222291 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_plos_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_plos_journals_2292048404</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A599872269</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_811c66d246044e76a71165b033925fc7</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A599872269</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-b8017fe881b61310b8dd4113f8b36d6b5648765c1b714fbd47743fd1b501a463</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkktv1DAUhSMEoqXwDxBEQkKwSPArtrNBGrU8Rqqo1Adby3HsGY8ycWono_bf4zBpNUFdkCzi2N899j0-SfIWghxiBr9s3OBb2eSda3UOUHxK-Cw5hiVGGUUAPz8YHyWvQtgAUGBO6cvkCMMCMc7xcXJ5E2y7Ss9-LdJKeuXq8a93qd123u10atudDDYOOh361Na67a2xSvbWtans05v8Kk875_uQOZPFVX__OnlhZBP0m-l7klx__3Z9-jM7v_ixPF2cZ4qWqM8qDiAzmnNYUYghqHhdEwix4RWmNa0KSjijhYIVg8RUNWGMYFPDqgBQEopPkvd72a5xQUxuBBFtQIBwAkgklnuidnIjOm-30t8LJ634O-H8SkjfW9VowSFUlNaIUECIZlQyCGlRAYxLVBjFotbXabeh2upajZ3KZiY6X2ntWqzcTlBGeEFRFPg0CXh3O0QzxdYGpZtGttoN-3OXPF7PeO4P_6BPdzdRKxkbsK1xcV81iopFUZacIUTLSOVPUPGt9daqGB1j4_ys4POsIDK9vutXcghBLK8u_5-9-D1nPx6way2bfh1cM4xBCnOQ7EHlXQhem0eTIRBj8h_cEGPyxZT8WPbu8IIeix6ijv8Ap1v7YQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2292048404</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Using DNA barcoding to improve invasive pest identification at U.S. ports-of-entry</title><source>PubMed (Medline)</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Public Library of Science</source><source>Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry</source><source>EZB Electronic Journals Library</source><creator>Madden, Mary J L ; Young, Robert G ; Brown, John W ; Miller, Scott E ; Frewin, Andrew J ; Hanner, Robert H</creator><creatorcontrib>Madden, Mary J L ; Young, Robert G ; Brown, John W ; Miller, Scott E ; Frewin, Andrew J ; Hanner, Robert H</creatorcontrib><description>Interception of potential invasive species at ports-of-entry is essential for effective biosecurity and biosurveillance programs. However, taxonomic assessment of the immature stages of most arthropods is challenging; characters for identification are often dependent on adult morphology and reproductive structures. This study aims to strengthen the identification of such specimens through DNA barcoding, with a focus on microlepidoptera. A sample of 241 primarily immature microlepidoptera specimens intercepted at U.S. ports-of-entry from 2007 to 2011 were selected for analysis. From this sample, 201 COI-5P sequences were generated and analyzed for concordance between morphology-based and DNA-based identifications. The retrospective analysis of the data over 10 years (2009 to 2019) using the Barcode of Life Data (BOLD) system demonstrates the importance of establishing and growing DNA barcode reference libraries for use in specimen identification. Additionally, analysis of specimen identification using public data (43.3% specimens identified) vs. non-public data (78.6% specimens identified) highlights the need to encourage researchers to make data publicly accessible. DNA barcoding surpassed morphological identification with 42.3% (public) and 66.7% (non-public) of the sampled specimens achieving a species-level identification, compared to 38.3% species-level identification by morphology. Whilst DNA barcoding was not able to identify all specimens in our dataset, its incorporation into border security programs as an adjunct to morphological identification can provide secondary lines of evidence and lower taxonomic resolution in many cases. Furthermore, with increased globalization, database records need to be clearly annotated for suspected specimen origin versus interception location.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0222291</identifier><identifier>PMID: 31527883</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Public Library of Science</publisher><subject>Animals ; Arthropods ; Arthropods - genetics ; Bar codes ; Biodiversity ; Biology ; Biology and life sciences ; Biosecurity ; Border stations ; Computer and information sciences ; Deoxyribonucleic acid ; DNA ; DNA - genetics ; DNA barcoding ; DNA Barcoding, Taxonomic - methods ; DNA sequencing ; Ecology and Environmental Sciences ; Entomology ; Gene sequencing ; Genetic aspects ; Globalization ; Humans ; Identification ; Intelligence gathering ; Interception ; Introduced species ; Invasive species ; Lepidoptera ; Microcephaly - diagnosis ; Microcephaly - parasitology ; Morphology ; Museums ; National security ; Natural history ; Nonnative species ; Nucleotide sequence ; Pest Control - methods ; Ports ; Research and analysis methods ; Retrospective Studies ; Security ; Taxonomy ; Zoology</subject><ispartof>PloS one, 2019-09, Vol.14 (9), p.e0222291</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2019 Public Library of Science</rights><rights>This is an open access article, free of all copyright, and may be freely reproduced, distributed, transmitted, modified, built upon, or otherwise used by anyone for any lawful purpose. The work is made available under the Creative Commons CC0 public domain dedication: https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-b8017fe881b61310b8dd4113f8b36d6b5648765c1b714fbd47743fd1b501a463</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-b8017fe881b61310b8dd4113f8b36d6b5648765c1b714fbd47743fd1b501a463</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-6731-2506 ; 0000-0002-3898-125X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6748562/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6748562/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,860,881,2096,2915,23845,27901,27902,53766,53768,79342,79343</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31527883$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Madden, Mary J L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Young, Robert G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brown, John W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Miller, Scott E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Frewin, Andrew J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hanner, Robert H</creatorcontrib><title>Using DNA barcoding to improve invasive pest identification at U.S. ports-of-entry</title><title>PloS one</title><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><description>Interception of potential invasive species at ports-of-entry is essential for effective biosecurity and biosurveillance programs. However, taxonomic assessment of the immature stages of most arthropods is challenging; characters for identification are often dependent on adult morphology and reproductive structures. This study aims to strengthen the identification of such specimens through DNA barcoding, with a focus on microlepidoptera. A sample of 241 primarily immature microlepidoptera specimens intercepted at U.S. ports-of-entry from 2007 to 2011 were selected for analysis. From this sample, 201 COI-5P sequences were generated and analyzed for concordance between morphology-based and DNA-based identifications. The retrospective analysis of the data over 10 years (2009 to 2019) using the Barcode of Life Data (BOLD) system demonstrates the importance of establishing and growing DNA barcode reference libraries for use in specimen identification. Additionally, analysis of specimen identification using public data (43.3% specimens identified) vs. non-public data (78.6% specimens identified) highlights the need to encourage researchers to make data publicly accessible. DNA barcoding surpassed morphological identification with 42.3% (public) and 66.7% (non-public) of the sampled specimens achieving a species-level identification, compared to 38.3% species-level identification by morphology. Whilst DNA barcoding was not able to identify all specimens in our dataset, its incorporation into border security programs as an adjunct to morphological identification can provide secondary lines of evidence and lower taxonomic resolution in many cases. Furthermore, with increased globalization, database records need to be clearly annotated for suspected specimen origin versus interception location.</description><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Arthropods</subject><subject>Arthropods - genetics</subject><subject>Bar codes</subject><subject>Biodiversity</subject><subject>Biology</subject><subject>Biology and life sciences</subject><subject>Biosecurity</subject><subject>Border stations</subject><subject>Computer and information sciences</subject><subject>Deoxyribonucleic acid</subject><subject>DNA</subject><subject>DNA - genetics</subject><subject>DNA barcoding</subject><subject>DNA Barcoding, Taxonomic - methods</subject><subject>DNA sequencing</subject><subject>Ecology and Environmental Sciences</subject><subject>Entomology</subject><subject>Gene sequencing</subject><subject>Genetic aspects</subject><subject>Globalization</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Identification</subject><subject>Intelligence gathering</subject><subject>Interception</subject><subject>Introduced species</subject><subject>Invasive species</subject><subject>Lepidoptera</subject><subject>Microcephaly - diagnosis</subject><subject>Microcephaly - parasitology</subject><subject>Morphology</subject><subject>Museums</subject><subject>National security</subject><subject>Natural history</subject><subject>Nonnative species</subject><subject>Nucleotide sequence</subject><subject>Pest Control - methods</subject><subject>Ports</subject><subject>Research and analysis methods</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Security</subject><subject>Taxonomy</subject><subject>Zoology</subject><issn>1932-6203</issn><issn>1932-6203</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkktv1DAUhSMEoqXwDxBEQkKwSPArtrNBGrU8Rqqo1Adby3HsGY8ycWono_bf4zBpNUFdkCzi2N899j0-SfIWghxiBr9s3OBb2eSda3UOUHxK-Cw5hiVGGUUAPz8YHyWvQtgAUGBO6cvkCMMCMc7xcXJ5E2y7Ss9-LdJKeuXq8a93qd123u10atudDDYOOh361Na67a2xSvbWtans05v8Kk875_uQOZPFVX__OnlhZBP0m-l7klx__3Z9-jM7v_ixPF2cZ4qWqM8qDiAzmnNYUYghqHhdEwix4RWmNa0KSjijhYIVg8RUNWGMYFPDqgBQEopPkvd72a5xQUxuBBFtQIBwAkgklnuidnIjOm-30t8LJ634O-H8SkjfW9VowSFUlNaIUECIZlQyCGlRAYxLVBjFotbXabeh2upajZ3KZiY6X2ntWqzcTlBGeEFRFPg0CXh3O0QzxdYGpZtGttoN-3OXPF7PeO4P_6BPdzdRKxkbsK1xcV81iopFUZacIUTLSOVPUPGt9daqGB1j4_ys4POsIDK9vutXcghBLK8u_5-9-D1nPx6way2bfh1cM4xBCnOQ7EHlXQhem0eTIRBj8h_cEGPyxZT8WPbu8IIeix6ijv8Ap1v7YQ</recordid><startdate>20190917</startdate><enddate>20190917</enddate><creator>Madden, Mary J L</creator><creator>Young, Robert G</creator><creator>Brown, John W</creator><creator>Miller, Scott E</creator><creator>Frewin, Andrew J</creator><creator>Hanner, Robert H</creator><general>Public Library of Science</general><general>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>IOV</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6731-2506</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3898-125X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20190917</creationdate><title>Using DNA barcoding to improve invasive pest identification at U.S. ports-of-entry</title><author>Madden, Mary J L ; Young, Robert G ; Brown, John W ; Miller, Scott E ; Frewin, Andrew J ; Hanner, Robert H</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-b8017fe881b61310b8dd4113f8b36d6b5648765c1b714fbd47743fd1b501a463</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Arthropods</topic><topic>Arthropods - genetics</topic><topic>Bar codes</topic><topic>Biodiversity</topic><topic>Biology</topic><topic>Biology and life sciences</topic><topic>Biosecurity</topic><topic>Border stations</topic><topic>Computer and information sciences</topic><topic>Deoxyribonucleic acid</topic><topic>DNA</topic><topic>DNA - genetics</topic><topic>DNA barcoding</topic><topic>DNA Barcoding, Taxonomic - methods</topic><topic>DNA sequencing</topic><topic>Ecology and Environmental Sciences</topic><topic>Entomology</topic><topic>Gene sequencing</topic><topic>Genetic aspects</topic><topic>Globalization</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Identification</topic><topic>Intelligence gathering</topic><topic>Interception</topic><topic>Introduced species</topic><topic>Invasive species</topic><topic>Lepidoptera</topic><topic>Microcephaly - diagnosis</topic><topic>Microcephaly - parasitology</topic><topic>Morphology</topic><topic>Museums</topic><topic>National security</topic><topic>Natural history</topic><topic>Nonnative species</topic><topic>Nucleotide sequence</topic><topic>Pest Control - methods</topic><topic>Ports</topic><topic>Research and analysis methods</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Security</topic><topic>Taxonomy</topic><topic>Zoology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Madden, Mary J L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Young, Robert G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brown, John W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Miller, Scott E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Frewin, Andrew J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hanner, Robert H</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Opposing Viewpoints Resource Center</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Nursing and Allied Health Journals</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database (1962 - current)</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Materials Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Biological Sciences</collection><collection>Agriculture Science Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest advanced technologies & aerospace journals</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Madden, Mary J L</au><au>Young, Robert G</au><au>Brown, John W</au><au>Miller, Scott E</au><au>Frewin, Andrew J</au><au>Hanner, Robert H</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Using DNA barcoding to improve invasive pest identification at U.S. ports-of-entry</atitle><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><date>2019-09-17</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>14</volume><issue>9</issue><spage>e0222291</spage><pages>e0222291-</pages><issn>1932-6203</issn><eissn>1932-6203</eissn><abstract>Interception of potential invasive species at ports-of-entry is essential for effective biosecurity and biosurveillance programs. However, taxonomic assessment of the immature stages of most arthropods is challenging; characters for identification are often dependent on adult morphology and reproductive structures. This study aims to strengthen the identification of such specimens through DNA barcoding, with a focus on microlepidoptera. A sample of 241 primarily immature microlepidoptera specimens intercepted at U.S. ports-of-entry from 2007 to 2011 were selected for analysis. From this sample, 201 COI-5P sequences were generated and analyzed for concordance between morphology-based and DNA-based identifications. The retrospective analysis of the data over 10 years (2009 to 2019) using the Barcode of Life Data (BOLD) system demonstrates the importance of establishing and growing DNA barcode reference libraries for use in specimen identification. Additionally, analysis of specimen identification using public data (43.3% specimens identified) vs. non-public data (78.6% specimens identified) highlights the need to encourage researchers to make data publicly accessible. DNA barcoding surpassed morphological identification with 42.3% (public) and 66.7% (non-public) of the sampled specimens achieving a species-level identification, compared to 38.3% species-level identification by morphology. Whilst DNA barcoding was not able to identify all specimens in our dataset, its incorporation into border security programs as an adjunct to morphological identification can provide secondary lines of evidence and lower taxonomic resolution in many cases. Furthermore, with increased globalization, database records need to be clearly annotated for suspected specimen origin versus interception location.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Public Library of Science</pub><pmid>31527883</pmid><doi>10.1371/journal.pone.0222291</doi><tpages>e0222291</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6731-2506</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3898-125X</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1932-6203 |
ispartof | PloS one, 2019-09, Vol.14 (9), p.e0222291 |
issn | 1932-6203 1932-6203 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_plos_journals_2292048404 |
source | PubMed (Medline); MEDLINE; Public Library of Science; Directory of Open Access Journals; Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry; EZB Electronic Journals Library |
subjects | Animals Arthropods Arthropods - genetics Bar codes Biodiversity Biology Biology and life sciences Biosecurity Border stations Computer and information sciences Deoxyribonucleic acid DNA DNA - genetics DNA barcoding DNA Barcoding, Taxonomic - methods DNA sequencing Ecology and Environmental Sciences Entomology Gene sequencing Genetic aspects Globalization Humans Identification Intelligence gathering Interception Introduced species Invasive species Lepidoptera Microcephaly - diagnosis Microcephaly - parasitology Morphology Museums National security Natural history Nonnative species Nucleotide sequence Pest Control - methods Ports Research and analysis methods Retrospective Studies Security Taxonomy Zoology |
title | Using DNA barcoding to improve invasive pest identification at U.S. ports-of-entry |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-07T16%3A34%3A14IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_plos_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Using%20DNA%20barcoding%20to%20improve%20invasive%20pest%20identification%20at%20U.S.%20ports-of-entry&rft.jtitle=PloS%20one&rft.au=Madden,%20Mary%20J%20L&rft.date=2019-09-17&rft.volume=14&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=e0222291&rft.pages=e0222291-&rft.issn=1932-6203&rft.eissn=1932-6203&rft_id=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0222291&rft_dat=%3Cgale_plos_%3EA599872269%3C/gale_plos_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2292048404&rft_id=info:pmid/31527883&rft_galeid=A599872269&rft_doaj_id=oai_doaj_org_article_811c66d246044e76a71165b033925fc7&rfr_iscdi=true |