Maintaining hope after a disabling stroke: A longitudinal qualitative study of patients' experiences, views, information needs and approaches towards making treatment decisions
Some treatments after a disabling stroke increase the likelihood patients will survive longer but with significant disability. Patients and doctors should make collaborative decisions regarding these treatments. However, this can be challenging. To better understand treatment decision-making in acut...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | PloS one 2019-09, Vol.14 (9), p.e0222500 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | 9 |
container_start_page | e0222500 |
container_title | PloS one |
container_volume | 14 |
creator | Visvanathan, Akila Mead, Gillian Dennis, Martin Whiteley, William Doubal, Fergus Lawton, Julia |
description | Some treatments after a disabling stroke increase the likelihood patients will survive longer but with significant disability. Patients and doctors should make collaborative decisions regarding these treatments. However, this can be challenging. To better understand treatment decision-making in acute disabling stroke, we explored the experiences, views and needs of stroke survivors in hospital and six months later.
Fifteen patients who had a disabling stroke were interviewed within a week of their diagnosis; eleven were re-interviewed six months later. Data were analysed thematically and longitudinally.
Patients' functional abilities prior to their stroke and need for hope of functional recovery appeared to impact on their involvement in decision-making. In the early period post stroke, patients who were functionally independent pre- stroke described being emotionally devastated and ill-prepared for the consequences of stroke. They appeared unaware that treatments offered might extend their life but with significant disability and took all treatments in the hope of functional recovery. Those who were dependent pre-stroke appeared to be more stoic, had considered treatment implications and decided against such treatments. At follow-up, all patients had varying unmet psychological needs which appeared to contribute to poor quality of life. In the early period post stroke, patients looked for various ways to cultivate and maintain hope of functional recovery. While patients continued to look for hope at six months, they also reported wishing they had been given realistic information in the early period after stroke in order to prepare for the consequences.
Stroke survivors may benefit from psychological support. A collaborative approach towards treatment decision-making may not be realistic in all patients especially when they may be emotionally distressed and looking to maintain a positive outlook. Communication strategies to balance maintaining hope without providing false hope may be appropriate. Patients' information needs may need reassessed at different time points. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1371/journal.pone.0222500 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_plos_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_plos_journals_2290061967</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A599407086</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_da39a473197c418b9d3e6bd165882ed3</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A599407086</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-a453cbcaade5c6055c1226d8efddc8edb4bd7d27729636093fe22f9c1e05473f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNk9tq3DAQhk1padK0b1BaQaEH6G5lyZbtXhSW0EMgJdDTrRhL410ltuVIcg5v1Ues3N2E3ZKLYoSk8Tf_aEaaJHma0nnKi_TdqR1dD-18sD3OKWMsp_Resp9WnM0Eo_z-1noveeT9KaU5L4V4mOzxNE9LLqr95PdXMH2Iw_RLsrIDEmgCOgJEGw91O5l9cPYM35MFaW2_NGHUJgYm5yO0JkAwFxiRUV8T25Ah7rEP_hXBqwFdXCv0b8mFwcs4mb6xrouI7UmPqD2BXhMYBmdBrdCTYC_BRXMHZ1Pk4BBCF_WIRmV8dPOPkwcNtB6fbOaD5Oenjz8Ov8yOTz4fHS6OZ0pULMwgy7mqFYDGXAma5yplTOgSG61VibrOal1oVhSsElzQijfIWFOpFGmeFbzhB8nzte7QWi83xfaSsYpSkVaiiMTRmtAWTuXgTAfuWlow8q_BuqUEF4xqUWrgFUTZtCpUlpZ1pTmKWqciL0uGmketD5toY92hVjFlB-2O6O6f3qzk0l5IUWS8iOMgeb0RcPZ8RB9kZ7zCtoUe7bg-d8lzntGIvvgHvTu7DbWEmMB0cTGumkTlIq-qjBa0FJGa30HFT2NnVHyZjYn2HYc3Ow6RCXgVljB6L4--f_t_9uTXLvtyi10htGHlbTtOT83vgtkaVM5677C5LXJK5dRYN9WQU2PJTWNFt2fbF3TrdNNJ_A8hNyKQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2290061967</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Maintaining hope after a disabling stroke: A longitudinal qualitative study of patients' experiences, views, information needs and approaches towards making treatment decisions</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry</source><creator>Visvanathan, Akila ; Mead, Gillian ; Dennis, Martin ; Whiteley, William ; Doubal, Fergus ; Lawton, Julia</creator><contributor>Sawyer, Alexandra</contributor><creatorcontrib>Visvanathan, Akila ; Mead, Gillian ; Dennis, Martin ; Whiteley, William ; Doubal, Fergus ; Lawton, Julia ; Sawyer, Alexandra</creatorcontrib><description>Some treatments after a disabling stroke increase the likelihood patients will survive longer but with significant disability. Patients and doctors should make collaborative decisions regarding these treatments. However, this can be challenging. To better understand treatment decision-making in acute disabling stroke, we explored the experiences, views and needs of stroke survivors in hospital and six months later.
Fifteen patients who had a disabling stroke were interviewed within a week of their diagnosis; eleven were re-interviewed six months later. Data were analysed thematically and longitudinally.
Patients' functional abilities prior to their stroke and need for hope of functional recovery appeared to impact on their involvement in decision-making. In the early period post stroke, patients who were functionally independent pre- stroke described being emotionally devastated and ill-prepared for the consequences of stroke. They appeared unaware that treatments offered might extend their life but with significant disability and took all treatments in the hope of functional recovery. Those who were dependent pre-stroke appeared to be more stoic, had considered treatment implications and decided against such treatments. At follow-up, all patients had varying unmet psychological needs which appeared to contribute to poor quality of life. In the early period post stroke, patients looked for various ways to cultivate and maintain hope of functional recovery. While patients continued to look for hope at six months, they also reported wishing they had been given realistic information in the early period after stroke in order to prepare for the consequences.
Stroke survivors may benefit from psychological support. A collaborative approach towards treatment decision-making may not be realistic in all patients especially when they may be emotionally distressed and looking to maintain a positive outlook. Communication strategies to balance maintaining hope without providing false hope may be appropriate. Patients' information needs may need reassessed at different time points.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0222500</identifier><identifier>PMID: 31518369</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Public Library of Science</publisher><subject>Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Beliefs, opinions and attitudes ; Care and treatment ; Collaboration ; Communication ; Decision making ; Decision Making - physiology ; Emotions ; Female ; Health aspects ; Hope - physiology ; Hospital patients ; Humans ; Longitude ; Longitudinal Studies ; Male ; Medical diagnosis ; Medical personnel ; Medical research ; Middle Aged ; Older people ; Patient education ; Patient outcomes ; Patients ; Physicians ; Qualitative Research ; Quality of life ; Quality of Life - psychology ; Recovery ; Recovery of function ; Stroke ; Stroke - psychology ; Stroke patients ; Stroke Rehabilitation - psychology ; Survival ; Survivors - psychology ; Systematic review</subject><ispartof>PloS one, 2019-09, Vol.14 (9), p.e0222500</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2019 Public Library of Science</rights><rights>2019 Visvanathan et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>2019 Visvanathan et al 2019 Visvanathan et al</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-a453cbcaade5c6055c1226d8efddc8edb4bd7d27729636093fe22f9c1e05473f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-a453cbcaade5c6055c1226d8efddc8edb4bd7d27729636093fe22f9c1e05473f3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-9713-8713</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6743774/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6743774/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,724,777,781,861,882,2096,2915,23847,27905,27906,53772,53774,79349,79350</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31518369$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Sawyer, Alexandra</contributor><creatorcontrib>Visvanathan, Akila</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mead, Gillian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dennis, Martin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Whiteley, William</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Doubal, Fergus</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lawton, Julia</creatorcontrib><title>Maintaining hope after a disabling stroke: A longitudinal qualitative study of patients' experiences, views, information needs and approaches towards making treatment decisions</title><title>PloS one</title><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><description>Some treatments after a disabling stroke increase the likelihood patients will survive longer but with significant disability. Patients and doctors should make collaborative decisions regarding these treatments. However, this can be challenging. To better understand treatment decision-making in acute disabling stroke, we explored the experiences, views and needs of stroke survivors in hospital and six months later.
Fifteen patients who had a disabling stroke were interviewed within a week of their diagnosis; eleven were re-interviewed six months later. Data were analysed thematically and longitudinally.
Patients' functional abilities prior to their stroke and need for hope of functional recovery appeared to impact on their involvement in decision-making. In the early period post stroke, patients who were functionally independent pre- stroke described being emotionally devastated and ill-prepared for the consequences of stroke. They appeared unaware that treatments offered might extend their life but with significant disability and took all treatments in the hope of functional recovery. Those who were dependent pre-stroke appeared to be more stoic, had considered treatment implications and decided against such treatments. At follow-up, all patients had varying unmet psychological needs which appeared to contribute to poor quality of life. In the early period post stroke, patients looked for various ways to cultivate and maintain hope of functional recovery. While patients continued to look for hope at six months, they also reported wishing they had been given realistic information in the early period after stroke in order to prepare for the consequences.
Stroke survivors may benefit from psychological support. A collaborative approach towards treatment decision-making may not be realistic in all patients especially when they may be emotionally distressed and looking to maintain a positive outlook. Communication strategies to balance maintaining hope without providing false hope may be appropriate. Patients' information needs may need reassessed at different time points.</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Beliefs, opinions and attitudes</subject><subject>Care and treatment</subject><subject>Collaboration</subject><subject>Communication</subject><subject>Decision making</subject><subject>Decision Making - physiology</subject><subject>Emotions</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Health aspects</subject><subject>Hope - physiology</subject><subject>Hospital patients</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Longitude</subject><subject>Longitudinal Studies</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical diagnosis</subject><subject>Medical personnel</subject><subject>Medical research</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Older people</subject><subject>Patient education</subject><subject>Patient outcomes</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Physicians</subject><subject>Qualitative Research</subject><subject>Quality of life</subject><subject>Quality of Life - psychology</subject><subject>Recovery</subject><subject>Recovery of function</subject><subject>Stroke</subject><subject>Stroke - psychology</subject><subject>Stroke patients</subject><subject>Stroke Rehabilitation - psychology</subject><subject>Survival</subject><subject>Survivors - psychology</subject><subject>Systematic review</subject><issn>1932-6203</issn><issn>1932-6203</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNqNk9tq3DAQhk1padK0b1BaQaEH6G5lyZbtXhSW0EMgJdDTrRhL410ltuVIcg5v1Ues3N2E3ZKLYoSk8Tf_aEaaJHma0nnKi_TdqR1dD-18sD3OKWMsp_Resp9WnM0Eo_z-1noveeT9KaU5L4V4mOzxNE9LLqr95PdXMH2Iw_RLsrIDEmgCOgJEGw91O5l9cPYM35MFaW2_NGHUJgYm5yO0JkAwFxiRUV8T25Ah7rEP_hXBqwFdXCv0b8mFwcs4mb6xrouI7UmPqD2BXhMYBmdBrdCTYC_BRXMHZ1Pk4BBCF_WIRmV8dPOPkwcNtB6fbOaD5Oenjz8Ov8yOTz4fHS6OZ0pULMwgy7mqFYDGXAma5yplTOgSG61VibrOal1oVhSsElzQijfIWFOpFGmeFbzhB8nzte7QWi83xfaSsYpSkVaiiMTRmtAWTuXgTAfuWlow8q_BuqUEF4xqUWrgFUTZtCpUlpZ1pTmKWqciL0uGmketD5toY92hVjFlB-2O6O6f3qzk0l5IUWS8iOMgeb0RcPZ8RB9kZ7zCtoUe7bg-d8lzntGIvvgHvTu7DbWEmMB0cTGumkTlIq-qjBa0FJGa30HFT2NnVHyZjYn2HYc3Ow6RCXgVljB6L4--f_t_9uTXLvtyi10htGHlbTtOT83vgtkaVM5677C5LXJK5dRYN9WQU2PJTWNFt2fbF3TrdNNJ_A8hNyKQ</recordid><startdate>20190913</startdate><enddate>20190913</enddate><creator>Visvanathan, Akila</creator><creator>Mead, Gillian</creator><creator>Dennis, Martin</creator><creator>Whiteley, William</creator><creator>Doubal, Fergus</creator><creator>Lawton, Julia</creator><general>Public Library of Science</general><general>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>IOV</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9713-8713</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20190913</creationdate><title>Maintaining hope after a disabling stroke: A longitudinal qualitative study of patients' experiences, views, information needs and approaches towards making treatment decisions</title><author>Visvanathan, Akila ; Mead, Gillian ; Dennis, Martin ; Whiteley, William ; Doubal, Fergus ; Lawton, Julia</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-a453cbcaade5c6055c1226d8efddc8edb4bd7d27729636093fe22f9c1e05473f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Beliefs, opinions and attitudes</topic><topic>Care and treatment</topic><topic>Collaboration</topic><topic>Communication</topic><topic>Decision making</topic><topic>Decision Making - physiology</topic><topic>Emotions</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Health aspects</topic><topic>Hope - physiology</topic><topic>Hospital patients</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Longitude</topic><topic>Longitudinal Studies</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical diagnosis</topic><topic>Medical personnel</topic><topic>Medical research</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Older people</topic><topic>Patient education</topic><topic>Patient outcomes</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Physicians</topic><topic>Qualitative Research</topic><topic>Quality of life</topic><topic>Quality of Life - psychology</topic><topic>Recovery</topic><topic>Recovery of function</topic><topic>Stroke</topic><topic>Stroke - psychology</topic><topic>Stroke patients</topic><topic>Stroke Rehabilitation - psychology</topic><topic>Survival</topic><topic>Survivors - psychology</topic><topic>Systematic review</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Visvanathan, Akila</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mead, Gillian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dennis, Martin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Whiteley, William</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Doubal, Fergus</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lawton, Julia</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Opposing Viewpoints</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Materials Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Visvanathan, Akila</au><au>Mead, Gillian</au><au>Dennis, Martin</au><au>Whiteley, William</au><au>Doubal, Fergus</au><au>Lawton, Julia</au><au>Sawyer, Alexandra</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Maintaining hope after a disabling stroke: A longitudinal qualitative study of patients' experiences, views, information needs and approaches towards making treatment decisions</atitle><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><date>2019-09-13</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>14</volume><issue>9</issue><spage>e0222500</spage><pages>e0222500-</pages><issn>1932-6203</issn><eissn>1932-6203</eissn><abstract>Some treatments after a disabling stroke increase the likelihood patients will survive longer but with significant disability. Patients and doctors should make collaborative decisions regarding these treatments. However, this can be challenging. To better understand treatment decision-making in acute disabling stroke, we explored the experiences, views and needs of stroke survivors in hospital and six months later.
Fifteen patients who had a disabling stroke were interviewed within a week of their diagnosis; eleven were re-interviewed six months later. Data were analysed thematically and longitudinally.
Patients' functional abilities prior to their stroke and need for hope of functional recovery appeared to impact on their involvement in decision-making. In the early period post stroke, patients who were functionally independent pre- stroke described being emotionally devastated and ill-prepared for the consequences of stroke. They appeared unaware that treatments offered might extend their life but with significant disability and took all treatments in the hope of functional recovery. Those who were dependent pre-stroke appeared to be more stoic, had considered treatment implications and decided against such treatments. At follow-up, all patients had varying unmet psychological needs which appeared to contribute to poor quality of life. In the early period post stroke, patients looked for various ways to cultivate and maintain hope of functional recovery. While patients continued to look for hope at six months, they also reported wishing they had been given realistic information in the early period after stroke in order to prepare for the consequences.
Stroke survivors may benefit from psychological support. A collaborative approach towards treatment decision-making may not be realistic in all patients especially when they may be emotionally distressed and looking to maintain a positive outlook. Communication strategies to balance maintaining hope without providing false hope may be appropriate. Patients' information needs may need reassessed at different time points.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Public Library of Science</pub><pmid>31518369</pmid><doi>10.1371/journal.pone.0222500</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9713-8713</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1932-6203 |
ispartof | PloS one, 2019-09, Vol.14 (9), p.e0222500 |
issn | 1932-6203 1932-6203 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_plos_journals_2290061967 |
source | MEDLINE; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Public Library of Science (PLoS); PubMed Central; Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry |
subjects | Aged Aged, 80 and over Beliefs, opinions and attitudes Care and treatment Collaboration Communication Decision making Decision Making - physiology Emotions Female Health aspects Hope - physiology Hospital patients Humans Longitude Longitudinal Studies Male Medical diagnosis Medical personnel Medical research Middle Aged Older people Patient education Patient outcomes Patients Physicians Qualitative Research Quality of life Quality of Life - psychology Recovery Recovery of function Stroke Stroke - psychology Stroke patients Stroke Rehabilitation - psychology Survival Survivors - psychology Systematic review |
title | Maintaining hope after a disabling stroke: A longitudinal qualitative study of patients' experiences, views, information needs and approaches towards making treatment decisions |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-19T16%3A56%3A37IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_plos_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Maintaining%20hope%20after%20a%20disabling%20stroke:%20A%20longitudinal%20qualitative%20study%20of%20patients'%20experiences,%20views,%20information%20needs%20and%20approaches%20towards%20making%20treatment%20decisions&rft.jtitle=PloS%20one&rft.au=Visvanathan,%20Akila&rft.date=2019-09-13&rft.volume=14&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=e0222500&rft.pages=e0222500-&rft.issn=1932-6203&rft.eissn=1932-6203&rft_id=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0222500&rft_dat=%3Cgale_plos_%3EA599407086%3C/gale_plos_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2290061967&rft_id=info:pmid/31518369&rft_galeid=A599407086&rft_doaj_id=oai_doaj_org_article_da39a473197c418b9d3e6bd165882ed3&rfr_iscdi=true |