Maintaining hope after a disabling stroke: A longitudinal qualitative study of patients' experiences, views, information needs and approaches towards making treatment decisions

Some treatments after a disabling stroke increase the likelihood patients will survive longer but with significant disability. Patients and doctors should make collaborative decisions regarding these treatments. However, this can be challenging. To better understand treatment decision-making in acut...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:PloS one 2019-09, Vol.14 (9), p.e0222500
Hauptverfasser: Visvanathan, Akila, Mead, Gillian, Dennis, Martin, Whiteley, William, Doubal, Fergus, Lawton, Julia
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 9
container_start_page e0222500
container_title PloS one
container_volume 14
creator Visvanathan, Akila
Mead, Gillian
Dennis, Martin
Whiteley, William
Doubal, Fergus
Lawton, Julia
description Some treatments after a disabling stroke increase the likelihood patients will survive longer but with significant disability. Patients and doctors should make collaborative decisions regarding these treatments. However, this can be challenging. To better understand treatment decision-making in acute disabling stroke, we explored the experiences, views and needs of stroke survivors in hospital and six months later. Fifteen patients who had a disabling stroke were interviewed within a week of their diagnosis; eleven were re-interviewed six months later. Data were analysed thematically and longitudinally. Patients' functional abilities prior to their stroke and need for hope of functional recovery appeared to impact on their involvement in decision-making. In the early period post stroke, patients who were functionally independent pre- stroke described being emotionally devastated and ill-prepared for the consequences of stroke. They appeared unaware that treatments offered might extend their life but with significant disability and took all treatments in the hope of functional recovery. Those who were dependent pre-stroke appeared to be more stoic, had considered treatment implications and decided against such treatments. At follow-up, all patients had varying unmet psychological needs which appeared to contribute to poor quality of life. In the early period post stroke, patients looked for various ways to cultivate and maintain hope of functional recovery. While patients continued to look for hope at six months, they also reported wishing they had been given realistic information in the early period after stroke in order to prepare for the consequences. Stroke survivors may benefit from psychological support. A collaborative approach towards treatment decision-making may not be realistic in all patients especially when they may be emotionally distressed and looking to maintain a positive outlook. Communication strategies to balance maintaining hope without providing false hope may be appropriate. Patients' information needs may need reassessed at different time points.
doi_str_mv 10.1371/journal.pone.0222500
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_plos_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_plos_journals_2290061967</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A599407086</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_da39a473197c418b9d3e6bd165882ed3</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A599407086</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-a453cbcaade5c6055c1226d8efddc8edb4bd7d27729636093fe22f9c1e05473f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNk9tq3DAQhk1padK0b1BaQaEH6G5lyZbtXhSW0EMgJdDTrRhL410ltuVIcg5v1Ues3N2E3ZKLYoSk8Tf_aEaaJHma0nnKi_TdqR1dD-18sD3OKWMsp_Resp9WnM0Eo_z-1noveeT9KaU5L4V4mOzxNE9LLqr95PdXMH2Iw_RLsrIDEmgCOgJEGw91O5l9cPYM35MFaW2_NGHUJgYm5yO0JkAwFxiRUV8T25Ah7rEP_hXBqwFdXCv0b8mFwcs4mb6xrouI7UmPqD2BXhMYBmdBrdCTYC_BRXMHZ1Pk4BBCF_WIRmV8dPOPkwcNtB6fbOaD5Oenjz8Ov8yOTz4fHS6OZ0pULMwgy7mqFYDGXAma5yplTOgSG61VibrOal1oVhSsElzQijfIWFOpFGmeFbzhB8nzte7QWi83xfaSsYpSkVaiiMTRmtAWTuXgTAfuWlow8q_BuqUEF4xqUWrgFUTZtCpUlpZ1pTmKWqciL0uGmketD5toY92hVjFlB-2O6O6f3qzk0l5IUWS8iOMgeb0RcPZ8RB9kZ7zCtoUe7bg-d8lzntGIvvgHvTu7DbWEmMB0cTGumkTlIq-qjBa0FJGa30HFT2NnVHyZjYn2HYc3Ow6RCXgVljB6L4--f_t_9uTXLvtyi10htGHlbTtOT83vgtkaVM5677C5LXJK5dRYN9WQU2PJTWNFt2fbF3TrdNNJ_A8hNyKQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2290061967</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Maintaining hope after a disabling stroke: A longitudinal qualitative study of patients' experiences, views, information needs and approaches towards making treatment decisions</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry</source><creator>Visvanathan, Akila ; Mead, Gillian ; Dennis, Martin ; Whiteley, William ; Doubal, Fergus ; Lawton, Julia</creator><contributor>Sawyer, Alexandra</contributor><creatorcontrib>Visvanathan, Akila ; Mead, Gillian ; Dennis, Martin ; Whiteley, William ; Doubal, Fergus ; Lawton, Julia ; Sawyer, Alexandra</creatorcontrib><description>Some treatments after a disabling stroke increase the likelihood patients will survive longer but with significant disability. Patients and doctors should make collaborative decisions regarding these treatments. However, this can be challenging. To better understand treatment decision-making in acute disabling stroke, we explored the experiences, views and needs of stroke survivors in hospital and six months later. Fifteen patients who had a disabling stroke were interviewed within a week of their diagnosis; eleven were re-interviewed six months later. Data were analysed thematically and longitudinally. Patients' functional abilities prior to their stroke and need for hope of functional recovery appeared to impact on their involvement in decision-making. In the early period post stroke, patients who were functionally independent pre- stroke described being emotionally devastated and ill-prepared for the consequences of stroke. They appeared unaware that treatments offered might extend their life but with significant disability and took all treatments in the hope of functional recovery. Those who were dependent pre-stroke appeared to be more stoic, had considered treatment implications and decided against such treatments. At follow-up, all patients had varying unmet psychological needs which appeared to contribute to poor quality of life. In the early period post stroke, patients looked for various ways to cultivate and maintain hope of functional recovery. While patients continued to look for hope at six months, they also reported wishing they had been given realistic information in the early period after stroke in order to prepare for the consequences. Stroke survivors may benefit from psychological support. A collaborative approach towards treatment decision-making may not be realistic in all patients especially when they may be emotionally distressed and looking to maintain a positive outlook. Communication strategies to balance maintaining hope without providing false hope may be appropriate. Patients' information needs may need reassessed at different time points.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0222500</identifier><identifier>PMID: 31518369</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Public Library of Science</publisher><subject>Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Beliefs, opinions and attitudes ; Care and treatment ; Collaboration ; Communication ; Decision making ; Decision Making - physiology ; Emotions ; Female ; Health aspects ; Hope - physiology ; Hospital patients ; Humans ; Longitude ; Longitudinal Studies ; Male ; Medical diagnosis ; Medical personnel ; Medical research ; Middle Aged ; Older people ; Patient education ; Patient outcomes ; Patients ; Physicians ; Qualitative Research ; Quality of life ; Quality of Life - psychology ; Recovery ; Recovery of function ; Stroke ; Stroke - psychology ; Stroke patients ; Stroke Rehabilitation - psychology ; Survival ; Survivors - psychology ; Systematic review</subject><ispartof>PloS one, 2019-09, Vol.14 (9), p.e0222500</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2019 Public Library of Science</rights><rights>2019 Visvanathan et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>2019 Visvanathan et al 2019 Visvanathan et al</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-a453cbcaade5c6055c1226d8efddc8edb4bd7d27729636093fe22f9c1e05473f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-a453cbcaade5c6055c1226d8efddc8edb4bd7d27729636093fe22f9c1e05473f3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-9713-8713</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6743774/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6743774/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,724,777,781,861,882,2096,2915,23847,27905,27906,53772,53774,79349,79350</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31518369$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Sawyer, Alexandra</contributor><creatorcontrib>Visvanathan, Akila</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mead, Gillian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dennis, Martin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Whiteley, William</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Doubal, Fergus</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lawton, Julia</creatorcontrib><title>Maintaining hope after a disabling stroke: A longitudinal qualitative study of patients' experiences, views, information needs and approaches towards making treatment decisions</title><title>PloS one</title><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><description>Some treatments after a disabling stroke increase the likelihood patients will survive longer but with significant disability. Patients and doctors should make collaborative decisions regarding these treatments. However, this can be challenging. To better understand treatment decision-making in acute disabling stroke, we explored the experiences, views and needs of stroke survivors in hospital and six months later. Fifteen patients who had a disabling stroke were interviewed within a week of their diagnosis; eleven were re-interviewed six months later. Data were analysed thematically and longitudinally. Patients' functional abilities prior to their stroke and need for hope of functional recovery appeared to impact on their involvement in decision-making. In the early period post stroke, patients who were functionally independent pre- stroke described being emotionally devastated and ill-prepared for the consequences of stroke. They appeared unaware that treatments offered might extend their life but with significant disability and took all treatments in the hope of functional recovery. Those who were dependent pre-stroke appeared to be more stoic, had considered treatment implications and decided against such treatments. At follow-up, all patients had varying unmet psychological needs which appeared to contribute to poor quality of life. In the early period post stroke, patients looked for various ways to cultivate and maintain hope of functional recovery. While patients continued to look for hope at six months, they also reported wishing they had been given realistic information in the early period after stroke in order to prepare for the consequences. Stroke survivors may benefit from psychological support. A collaborative approach towards treatment decision-making may not be realistic in all patients especially when they may be emotionally distressed and looking to maintain a positive outlook. Communication strategies to balance maintaining hope without providing false hope may be appropriate. Patients' information needs may need reassessed at different time points.</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Beliefs, opinions and attitudes</subject><subject>Care and treatment</subject><subject>Collaboration</subject><subject>Communication</subject><subject>Decision making</subject><subject>Decision Making - physiology</subject><subject>Emotions</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Health aspects</subject><subject>Hope - physiology</subject><subject>Hospital patients</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Longitude</subject><subject>Longitudinal Studies</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical diagnosis</subject><subject>Medical personnel</subject><subject>Medical research</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Older people</subject><subject>Patient education</subject><subject>Patient outcomes</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Physicians</subject><subject>Qualitative Research</subject><subject>Quality of life</subject><subject>Quality of Life - psychology</subject><subject>Recovery</subject><subject>Recovery of function</subject><subject>Stroke</subject><subject>Stroke - psychology</subject><subject>Stroke patients</subject><subject>Stroke Rehabilitation - psychology</subject><subject>Survival</subject><subject>Survivors - psychology</subject><subject>Systematic review</subject><issn>1932-6203</issn><issn>1932-6203</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNqNk9tq3DAQhk1padK0b1BaQaEH6G5lyZbtXhSW0EMgJdDTrRhL410ltuVIcg5v1Ues3N2E3ZKLYoSk8Tf_aEaaJHma0nnKi_TdqR1dD-18sD3OKWMsp_Resp9WnM0Eo_z-1noveeT9KaU5L4V4mOzxNE9LLqr95PdXMH2Iw_RLsrIDEmgCOgJEGw91O5l9cPYM35MFaW2_NGHUJgYm5yO0JkAwFxiRUV8T25Ah7rEP_hXBqwFdXCv0b8mFwcs4mb6xrouI7UmPqD2BXhMYBmdBrdCTYC_BRXMHZ1Pk4BBCF_WIRmV8dPOPkwcNtB6fbOaD5Oenjz8Ov8yOTz4fHS6OZ0pULMwgy7mqFYDGXAma5yplTOgSG61VibrOal1oVhSsElzQijfIWFOpFGmeFbzhB8nzte7QWi83xfaSsYpSkVaiiMTRmtAWTuXgTAfuWlow8q_BuqUEF4xqUWrgFUTZtCpUlpZ1pTmKWqciL0uGmketD5toY92hVjFlB-2O6O6f3qzk0l5IUWS8iOMgeb0RcPZ8RB9kZ7zCtoUe7bg-d8lzntGIvvgHvTu7DbWEmMB0cTGumkTlIq-qjBa0FJGa30HFT2NnVHyZjYn2HYc3Ow6RCXgVljB6L4--f_t_9uTXLvtyi10htGHlbTtOT83vgtkaVM5677C5LXJK5dRYN9WQU2PJTWNFt2fbF3TrdNNJ_A8hNyKQ</recordid><startdate>20190913</startdate><enddate>20190913</enddate><creator>Visvanathan, Akila</creator><creator>Mead, Gillian</creator><creator>Dennis, Martin</creator><creator>Whiteley, William</creator><creator>Doubal, Fergus</creator><creator>Lawton, Julia</creator><general>Public Library of Science</general><general>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>IOV</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9713-8713</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20190913</creationdate><title>Maintaining hope after a disabling stroke: A longitudinal qualitative study of patients' experiences, views, information needs and approaches towards making treatment decisions</title><author>Visvanathan, Akila ; Mead, Gillian ; Dennis, Martin ; Whiteley, William ; Doubal, Fergus ; Lawton, Julia</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-a453cbcaade5c6055c1226d8efddc8edb4bd7d27729636093fe22f9c1e05473f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Beliefs, opinions and attitudes</topic><topic>Care and treatment</topic><topic>Collaboration</topic><topic>Communication</topic><topic>Decision making</topic><topic>Decision Making - physiology</topic><topic>Emotions</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Health aspects</topic><topic>Hope - physiology</topic><topic>Hospital patients</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Longitude</topic><topic>Longitudinal Studies</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical diagnosis</topic><topic>Medical personnel</topic><topic>Medical research</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Older people</topic><topic>Patient education</topic><topic>Patient outcomes</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Physicians</topic><topic>Qualitative Research</topic><topic>Quality of life</topic><topic>Quality of Life - psychology</topic><topic>Recovery</topic><topic>Recovery of function</topic><topic>Stroke</topic><topic>Stroke - psychology</topic><topic>Stroke patients</topic><topic>Stroke Rehabilitation - psychology</topic><topic>Survival</topic><topic>Survivors - psychology</topic><topic>Systematic review</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Visvanathan, Akila</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mead, Gillian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dennis, Martin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Whiteley, William</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Doubal, Fergus</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lawton, Julia</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Opposing Viewpoints</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Materials Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Visvanathan, Akila</au><au>Mead, Gillian</au><au>Dennis, Martin</au><au>Whiteley, William</au><au>Doubal, Fergus</au><au>Lawton, Julia</au><au>Sawyer, Alexandra</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Maintaining hope after a disabling stroke: A longitudinal qualitative study of patients' experiences, views, information needs and approaches towards making treatment decisions</atitle><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><date>2019-09-13</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>14</volume><issue>9</issue><spage>e0222500</spage><pages>e0222500-</pages><issn>1932-6203</issn><eissn>1932-6203</eissn><abstract>Some treatments after a disabling stroke increase the likelihood patients will survive longer but with significant disability. Patients and doctors should make collaborative decisions regarding these treatments. However, this can be challenging. To better understand treatment decision-making in acute disabling stroke, we explored the experiences, views and needs of stroke survivors in hospital and six months later. Fifteen patients who had a disabling stroke were interviewed within a week of their diagnosis; eleven were re-interviewed six months later. Data were analysed thematically and longitudinally. Patients' functional abilities prior to their stroke and need for hope of functional recovery appeared to impact on their involvement in decision-making. In the early period post stroke, patients who were functionally independent pre- stroke described being emotionally devastated and ill-prepared for the consequences of stroke. They appeared unaware that treatments offered might extend their life but with significant disability and took all treatments in the hope of functional recovery. Those who were dependent pre-stroke appeared to be more stoic, had considered treatment implications and decided against such treatments. At follow-up, all patients had varying unmet psychological needs which appeared to contribute to poor quality of life. In the early period post stroke, patients looked for various ways to cultivate and maintain hope of functional recovery. While patients continued to look for hope at six months, they also reported wishing they had been given realistic information in the early period after stroke in order to prepare for the consequences. Stroke survivors may benefit from psychological support. A collaborative approach towards treatment decision-making may not be realistic in all patients especially when they may be emotionally distressed and looking to maintain a positive outlook. Communication strategies to balance maintaining hope without providing false hope may be appropriate. Patients' information needs may need reassessed at different time points.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Public Library of Science</pub><pmid>31518369</pmid><doi>10.1371/journal.pone.0222500</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9713-8713</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1932-6203
ispartof PloS one, 2019-09, Vol.14 (9), p.e0222500
issn 1932-6203
1932-6203
language eng
recordid cdi_plos_journals_2290061967
source MEDLINE; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Public Library of Science (PLoS); PubMed Central; Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry
subjects Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Beliefs, opinions and attitudes
Care and treatment
Collaboration
Communication
Decision making
Decision Making - physiology
Emotions
Female
Health aspects
Hope - physiology
Hospital patients
Humans
Longitude
Longitudinal Studies
Male
Medical diagnosis
Medical personnel
Medical research
Middle Aged
Older people
Patient education
Patient outcomes
Patients
Physicians
Qualitative Research
Quality of life
Quality of Life - psychology
Recovery
Recovery of function
Stroke
Stroke - psychology
Stroke patients
Stroke Rehabilitation - psychology
Survival
Survivors - psychology
Systematic review
title Maintaining hope after a disabling stroke: A longitudinal qualitative study of patients' experiences, views, information needs and approaches towards making treatment decisions
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-19T16%3A56%3A37IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_plos_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Maintaining%20hope%20after%20a%20disabling%20stroke:%20A%20longitudinal%20qualitative%20study%20of%20patients'%20experiences,%20views,%20information%20needs%20and%20approaches%20towards%20making%20treatment%20decisions&rft.jtitle=PloS%20one&rft.au=Visvanathan,%20Akila&rft.date=2019-09-13&rft.volume=14&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=e0222500&rft.pages=e0222500-&rft.issn=1932-6203&rft.eissn=1932-6203&rft_id=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0222500&rft_dat=%3Cgale_plos_%3EA599407086%3C/gale_plos_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2290061967&rft_id=info:pmid/31518369&rft_galeid=A599407086&rft_doaj_id=oai_doaj_org_article_da39a473197c418b9d3e6bd165882ed3&rfr_iscdi=true