Free will beliefs are better predicted by dualism than determinism beliefs across different cultures
Most people believe in free will. Whether this belief is warranted or not, free will beliefs (FWB) are foundational for many legal systems and reducing FWB has effects on behavior from the motor to the social level. This raises the important question as to which specific FWB people hold. There are m...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | PloS one 2019-09, Vol.14 (9), p.e0221617-e0221617 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | e0221617 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 9 |
| container_start_page | e0221617 |
| container_title | PloS one |
| container_volume | 14 |
| creator | Wisniewski, David Deutschländer, Robert Haynes, John-Dylan |
| description | Most people believe in free will. Whether this belief is warranted or not, free will beliefs (FWB) are foundational for many legal systems and reducing FWB has effects on behavior from the motor to the social level. This raises the important question as to which specific FWB people hold. There are many different ways to conceptualize free will, and some might see physical determinism as a threat that might reduce FWB, while others might not. Here, we investigate lay FWB in a large, representative, replicated online survey study in the US and Singapore (n = 1800), assessing differences in FWB with unprecedented depth within and between cultures. Specifically, we assess the relation of FWB, as measured using the Free Will Inventory, to determinism, dualism and related concepts like libertarianism and compatibilism. We find that libertarian, compatibilist, and dualist, intuitions were related to FWB, but that these intuitions were often logically inconsistent. Importantly, direct comparisons suggest that dualism was more predictive of FWB than other intuitions. Thus, believing in free will goes hand-in-hand with a belief in a non-physical mind. Highlighting the importance of dualism for FWB impacts academic debates on free will, which currently largely focus on its relation to determinism. Our findings also shed light on how recent (neuro)scientific findings might impact FWB. Demonstrating physical determinism in the brain need not have a strong impact on FWB, due to a wide-spread belief in dualism. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1371/journal.pone.0221617 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_plos_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_plos_journals_2289025311</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A599140449</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_f1f9e4b821354c04a3f1e7b535ccf811</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A599140449</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-4c17e991222bf43330266a0ce36b4cb70d33ca097c26f1830c4c641f32c08b4c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNk01r3DAQhk1padK0_6C0hkJoD7vVl2X7UgihaRcCgX5dhSyPdrXI1kaS2-TfV7vrLOuSQ_HBYvS873jGM1n2GqM5piX-uHaD76Wdb1wPc0QI5rh8kp3impIZJ4g-PTqfZC9CWCNU0Irz59kJxQWqC05Os_bKA-R_jLV5A9aADrn0kM4xgs83HlqjIrR5c5-3g7QmdHlcyT5vId13pt8GDkLlXQh5a7QGD33M1WDj4CG8zJ5paQO8Gt9n2c-rzz8uv86ub74sLi-uZ4rXJM6YwiXUNSaENJpRShHhXCIFlDdMNSVqKVUS1aUiXOOKIsUUZ1hTolCVCHqWvd37bqwLYmxQEIRUNSIFxTgRiz3ROrkWG2866e-Fk0bsAs4vhfTRKAtCY10DayqCacEUYpJqDGVT0EIpXe28Po3ZhqaDVqWKvbQT0-lNb1Zi6X4LXtKqqOpk8H408O52gBBFZ4ICa2UPbth_d1GWiPKEvvsHfby6kVrKVIDptUt51dZUXBSpsQwxtk07f4RKTwudUWmatEnxieDDRJCYCHdxKYcQxOL7t_9nb35N2fMjdgXSxlVwdojG9WEKsj24GzAP-tBkjMR2GR66IbbLIMZlSLI3xz_oIHqYfvoXFNAEOg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2289025311</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Free will beliefs are better predicted by dualism than determinism beliefs across different cultures</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry</source><source>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</source><creator>Wisniewski, David ; Deutschländer, Robert ; Haynes, John-Dylan</creator><creatorcontrib>Wisniewski, David ; Deutschländer, Robert ; Haynes, John-Dylan</creatorcontrib><description>Most people believe in free will. Whether this belief is warranted or not, free will beliefs (FWB) are foundational for many legal systems and reducing FWB has effects on behavior from the motor to the social level. This raises the important question as to which specific FWB people hold. There are many different ways to conceptualize free will, and some might see physical determinism as a threat that might reduce FWB, while others might not. Here, we investigate lay FWB in a large, representative, replicated online survey study in the US and Singapore (n = 1800), assessing differences in FWB with unprecedented depth within and between cultures. Specifically, we assess the relation of FWB, as measured using the Free Will Inventory, to determinism, dualism and related concepts like libertarianism and compatibilism. We find that libertarian, compatibilist, and dualist, intuitions were related to FWB, but that these intuitions were often logically inconsistent. Importantly, direct comparisons suggest that dualism was more predictive of FWB than other intuitions. Thus, believing in free will goes hand-in-hand with a belief in a non-physical mind. Highlighting the importance of dualism for FWB impacts academic debates on free will, which currently largely focus on its relation to determinism. Our findings also shed light on how recent (neuro)scientific findings might impact FWB. Demonstrating physical determinism in the brain need not have a strong impact on FWB, due to a wide-spread belief in dualism.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0221617</identifier><identifier>PMID: 31509562</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Public Library of Science</publisher><subject>Adult ; Age Distribution ; Analysis ; Beliefs ; Biology and Life Sciences ; Computer and Information Sciences ; Criminal investigations ; Cultural Evolution ; Culture ; Determinism ; Dualism (Philosophy) ; Female ; Free will ; Freedom ; Health Surveys ; Humans ; Intuition ; Libertarianism ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Neurosciences ; People and places ; Personal Autonomy ; Philosophy ; Psychology ; Research and Analysis Methods ; Singapore ; Social Behavior ; Social Sciences ; United States ; Wisniewski, David ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>PloS one, 2019-09, Vol.14 (9), p.e0221617-e0221617</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2019 Public Library of Science</rights><rights>2019 Wisniewski et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>2019 Wisniewski et al 2019 Wisniewski et al</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-4c17e991222bf43330266a0ce36b4cb70d33ca097c26f1830c4c641f32c08b4c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-4c17e991222bf43330266a0ce36b4cb70d33ca097c26f1830c4c641f32c08b4c3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-4793-1171</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6738589/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6738589/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,860,881,2096,2915,23845,27901,27902,53766,53768,79343,79344</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31509562$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Wisniewski, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Deutschländer, Robert</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Haynes, John-Dylan</creatorcontrib><title>Free will beliefs are better predicted by dualism than determinism beliefs across different cultures</title><title>PloS one</title><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><description>Most people believe in free will. Whether this belief is warranted or not, free will beliefs (FWB) are foundational for many legal systems and reducing FWB has effects on behavior from the motor to the social level. This raises the important question as to which specific FWB people hold. There are many different ways to conceptualize free will, and some might see physical determinism as a threat that might reduce FWB, while others might not. Here, we investigate lay FWB in a large, representative, replicated online survey study in the US and Singapore (n = 1800), assessing differences in FWB with unprecedented depth within and between cultures. Specifically, we assess the relation of FWB, as measured using the Free Will Inventory, to determinism, dualism and related concepts like libertarianism and compatibilism. We find that libertarian, compatibilist, and dualist, intuitions were related to FWB, but that these intuitions were often logically inconsistent. Importantly, direct comparisons suggest that dualism was more predictive of FWB than other intuitions. Thus, believing in free will goes hand-in-hand with a belief in a non-physical mind. Highlighting the importance of dualism for FWB impacts academic debates on free will, which currently largely focus on its relation to determinism. Our findings also shed light on how recent (neuro)scientific findings might impact FWB. Demonstrating physical determinism in the brain need not have a strong impact on FWB, due to a wide-spread belief in dualism.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Age Distribution</subject><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>Beliefs</subject><subject>Biology and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Computer and Information Sciences</subject><subject>Criminal investigations</subject><subject>Cultural Evolution</subject><subject>Culture</subject><subject>Determinism</subject><subject>Dualism (Philosophy)</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Free will</subject><subject>Freedom</subject><subject>Health Surveys</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Intuition</subject><subject>Libertarianism</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Neurosciences</subject><subject>People and places</subject><subject>Personal Autonomy</subject><subject>Philosophy</subject><subject>Psychology</subject><subject>Research and Analysis Methods</subject><subject>Singapore</subject><subject>Social Behavior</subject><subject>Social Sciences</subject><subject>United States</subject><subject>Wisniewski, David</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>1932-6203</issn><issn>1932-6203</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNqNk01r3DAQhk1padK0_6C0hkJoD7vVl2X7UgihaRcCgX5dhSyPdrXI1kaS2-TfV7vrLOuSQ_HBYvS873jGM1n2GqM5piX-uHaD76Wdb1wPc0QI5rh8kp3impIZJ4g-PTqfZC9CWCNU0Irz59kJxQWqC05Os_bKA-R_jLV5A9aADrn0kM4xgs83HlqjIrR5c5-3g7QmdHlcyT5vId13pt8GDkLlXQh5a7QGD33M1WDj4CG8zJ5paQO8Gt9n2c-rzz8uv86ub74sLi-uZ4rXJM6YwiXUNSaENJpRShHhXCIFlDdMNSVqKVUS1aUiXOOKIsUUZ1hTolCVCHqWvd37bqwLYmxQEIRUNSIFxTgRiz3ROrkWG2866e-Fk0bsAs4vhfTRKAtCY10DayqCacEUYpJqDGVT0EIpXe28Po3ZhqaDVqWKvbQT0-lNb1Zi6X4LXtKqqOpk8H408O52gBBFZ4ICa2UPbth_d1GWiPKEvvsHfby6kVrKVIDptUt51dZUXBSpsQwxtk07f4RKTwudUWmatEnxieDDRJCYCHdxKYcQxOL7t_9nb35N2fMjdgXSxlVwdojG9WEKsj24GzAP-tBkjMR2GR66IbbLIMZlSLI3xz_oIHqYfvoXFNAEOg</recordid><startdate>20190911</startdate><enddate>20190911</enddate><creator>Wisniewski, David</creator><creator>Deutschländer, Robert</creator><creator>Haynes, John-Dylan</creator><general>Public Library of Science</general><general>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>IOV</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4793-1171</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20190911</creationdate><title>Free will beliefs are better predicted by dualism than determinism beliefs across different cultures</title><author>Wisniewski, David ; Deutschländer, Robert ; Haynes, John-Dylan</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-4c17e991222bf43330266a0ce36b4cb70d33ca097c26f1830c4c641f32c08b4c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Age Distribution</topic><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>Beliefs</topic><topic>Biology and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Computer and Information Sciences</topic><topic>Criminal investigations</topic><topic>Cultural Evolution</topic><topic>Culture</topic><topic>Determinism</topic><topic>Dualism (Philosophy)</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Free will</topic><topic>Freedom</topic><topic>Health Surveys</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Intuition</topic><topic>Libertarianism</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Neurosciences</topic><topic>People and places</topic><topic>Personal Autonomy</topic><topic>Philosophy</topic><topic>Psychology</topic><topic>Research and Analysis Methods</topic><topic>Singapore</topic><topic>Social Behavior</topic><topic>Social Sciences</topic><topic>United States</topic><topic>Wisniewski, David</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Wisniewski, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Deutschländer, Robert</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Haynes, John-Dylan</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Opposing Viewpoints</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Materials Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Wisniewski, David</au><au>Deutschländer, Robert</au><au>Haynes, John-Dylan</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Free will beliefs are better predicted by dualism than determinism beliefs across different cultures</atitle><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><date>2019-09-11</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>14</volume><issue>9</issue><spage>e0221617</spage><epage>e0221617</epage><pages>e0221617-e0221617</pages><issn>1932-6203</issn><eissn>1932-6203</eissn><abstract>Most people believe in free will. Whether this belief is warranted or not, free will beliefs (FWB) are foundational for many legal systems and reducing FWB has effects on behavior from the motor to the social level. This raises the important question as to which specific FWB people hold. There are many different ways to conceptualize free will, and some might see physical determinism as a threat that might reduce FWB, while others might not. Here, we investigate lay FWB in a large, representative, replicated online survey study in the US and Singapore (n = 1800), assessing differences in FWB with unprecedented depth within and between cultures. Specifically, we assess the relation of FWB, as measured using the Free Will Inventory, to determinism, dualism and related concepts like libertarianism and compatibilism. We find that libertarian, compatibilist, and dualist, intuitions were related to FWB, but that these intuitions were often logically inconsistent. Importantly, direct comparisons suggest that dualism was more predictive of FWB than other intuitions. Thus, believing in free will goes hand-in-hand with a belief in a non-physical mind. Highlighting the importance of dualism for FWB impacts academic debates on free will, which currently largely focus on its relation to determinism. Our findings also shed light on how recent (neuro)scientific findings might impact FWB. Demonstrating physical determinism in the brain need not have a strong impact on FWB, due to a wide-spread belief in dualism.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Public Library of Science</pub><pmid>31509562</pmid><doi>10.1371/journal.pone.0221617</doi><tpages>e0221617</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4793-1171</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 1932-6203 |
| ispartof | PloS one, 2019-09, Vol.14 (9), p.e0221617-e0221617 |
| issn | 1932-6203 1932-6203 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_plos_journals_2289025311 |
| source | MEDLINE; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; PubMed Central; Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry; Public Library of Science (PLoS) |
| subjects | Adult Age Distribution Analysis Beliefs Biology and Life Sciences Computer and Information Sciences Criminal investigations Cultural Evolution Culture Determinism Dualism (Philosophy) Female Free will Freedom Health Surveys Humans Intuition Libertarianism Male Middle Aged Neurosciences People and places Personal Autonomy Philosophy Psychology Research and Analysis Methods Singapore Social Behavior Social Sciences United States Wisniewski, David Young Adult |
| title | Free will beliefs are better predicted by dualism than determinism beliefs across different cultures |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-02T20%3A07%3A54IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_plos_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Free%20will%20beliefs%20are%20better%20predicted%20by%20dualism%20than%20determinism%20beliefs%20across%20different%20cultures&rft.jtitle=PloS%20one&rft.au=Wisniewski,%20David&rft.date=2019-09-11&rft.volume=14&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=e0221617&rft.epage=e0221617&rft.pages=e0221617-e0221617&rft.issn=1932-6203&rft.eissn=1932-6203&rft_id=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0221617&rft_dat=%3Cgale_plos_%3EA599140449%3C/gale_plos_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2289025311&rft_id=info:pmid/31509562&rft_galeid=A599140449&rft_doaj_id=oai_doaj_org_article_f1f9e4b821354c04a3f1e7b535ccf811&rfr_iscdi=true |