Categorising interventions to levels of inpatient care for small and sick newborns: Findings from a global survey

In 2017, 2.5 million newborns died, mainly from prematurity, infections, and intrapartum events. Preventing these deaths requires health systems to provide routine and emergency care at birth, and quality inpatient care for small and sick newborns. Defined levels of emergency obstetric care (EmOC) a...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:PloS one 2019-07, Vol.14 (7), p.e0218748-e0218748
Hauptverfasser: Moxon, Sarah G, Blencowe, Hannah, Bailey, Patricia, Bradley, John, Day, Louise Tina, Ram, Pavani K, Monet, Jean-Pierre, Moran, Allisyn C, Zeck, Willibald, Lawn, Joy E
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page e0218748
container_issue 7
container_start_page e0218748
container_title PloS one
container_volume 14
creator Moxon, Sarah G
Blencowe, Hannah
Bailey, Patricia
Bradley, John
Day, Louise Tina
Ram, Pavani K
Monet, Jean-Pierre
Moran, Allisyn C
Zeck, Willibald
Lawn, Joy E
description In 2017, 2.5 million newborns died, mainly from prematurity, infections, and intrapartum events. Preventing these deaths requires health systems to provide routine and emergency care at birth, and quality inpatient care for small and sick newborns. Defined levels of emergency obstetric care (EmOC) and standardised measurement of "signal functions" has improved tracking of maternal care in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). Levels of newborn care, particularly for small and sick newborns, and associated signal functions are still not consistently defined or tracked. Between November 2016-November 2017, we conducted an online survey of professionals working in maternal and newborn health. We asked respondents to categorise 18 clinical care interventions that could act as potential signal functions for small and sick newborns to 3 levels of care they thought were appropriate for health systems in LMICs to provide: "routine care at birth", "special care" and "intensive care". We calculated the percentage of respondents that classified each intervention at each level of care and stratified responses to look at variation by respondent characteristics. Six interventions were classified to specific levels by more than 50% of respondents as "routine care at birth," three interventions as "special care" and one as "intensive care". Eight interventions were borderline between these care levels. Responses were more consistent for interventions with relevant WHO clinical care guidelines while more variation in respondents' classification was observed in complex interventions that lack standards or guidelines. Respondents with experience in lower-income settings were more likely to assign a higher level of care for more complex interventions. Results were consistent with known challenges of scaling up inpatient care in lower-income settings and underline the importance of comprehensive guidelines and standards for inpatient care. Further work is needed to develop a shortlist of newborn signal functions aligned with emergency obstetric care levels to track universal health coverage for mothers and their newborns.
doi_str_mv 10.1371/journal.pone.0218748
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_plos_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_plos_journals_2256178044</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A592987723</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_53acae3d67d649a393d50dfe79e50b3a</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A592987723</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-6a8e99e342158f5f5287ae5c911fcd6d480b3bc8e1f2f90ca17c43a570336e103</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNk99vFCEQgDdGY2v1PzBKYmL04c4FFnbpg0nTWG3SpIm_XskcO2ypHFxht9r_Xq69Nj3TB7MPbJhvPmBgquolreeUt_TDeZxSAD9fxYDzmtGubbpH1S5VnM0kq_nje_871bOcz-ta8E7Kp9UOp0wJJtludXEIIw4xuezCQFwYMV1iGF0MmYyReLxEn0m0JbSC0ZUQMZCQ2JhIXoL3BEJPsjO_SMDfi5hC3idHLvRFl4lNcUmADD4uwJM8FffV8-qJBZ_xxWbcq34cffp--GV2cvr5-PDgZGakYuNMQodKIW8YFZ0VVrCuBRRGUWpNL_umqxd8YTqklllVG6CtaTiItuZcIq35XvX6xrvyMetNtbJmTEjadnXTFOL4hugjnOtVcktIVzqC09cTMQ0a0uiMRy04GEDey7aXjQKueC_q3mKrUJR9QHF93Kw2LZbYm1KoBH5Luh0J7kwP8VJLybgSvAjebQQpXkyYR7102aD3EDBO1_tupWrKZRb0zT_ow6fbUAOUA7hgY1nXrKX6QCimurZla9f8Aap8PS6dKU_LujK_lfB-K6EwI_4ZB5hy1sffvv4_e_pzm317jz1D8ONZjn66forbYHMDmhRzTmjvikxrve6M22rodWfoTWeUtFf3L-gu6bYV-F9-zQoC</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2256178044</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Categorising interventions to levels of inpatient care for small and sick newborns: Findings from a global survey</title><source>PLoS</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry</source><source>EZB Electronic Journals Library</source><creator>Moxon, Sarah G ; Blencowe, Hannah ; Bailey, Patricia ; Bradley, John ; Day, Louise Tina ; Ram, Pavani K ; Monet, Jean-Pierre ; Moran, Allisyn C ; Zeck, Willibald ; Lawn, Joy E</creator><creatorcontrib>Moxon, Sarah G ; Blencowe, Hannah ; Bailey, Patricia ; Bradley, John ; Day, Louise Tina ; Ram, Pavani K ; Monet, Jean-Pierre ; Moran, Allisyn C ; Zeck, Willibald ; Lawn, Joy E</creatorcontrib><description>In 2017, 2.5 million newborns died, mainly from prematurity, infections, and intrapartum events. Preventing these deaths requires health systems to provide routine and emergency care at birth, and quality inpatient care for small and sick newborns. Defined levels of emergency obstetric care (EmOC) and standardised measurement of "signal functions" has improved tracking of maternal care in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). Levels of newborn care, particularly for small and sick newborns, and associated signal functions are still not consistently defined or tracked. Between November 2016-November 2017, we conducted an online survey of professionals working in maternal and newborn health. We asked respondents to categorise 18 clinical care interventions that could act as potential signal functions for small and sick newborns to 3 levels of care they thought were appropriate for health systems in LMICs to provide: "routine care at birth", "special care" and "intensive care". We calculated the percentage of respondents that classified each intervention at each level of care and stratified responses to look at variation by respondent characteristics. Six interventions were classified to specific levels by more than 50% of respondents as "routine care at birth," three interventions as "special care" and one as "intensive care". Eight interventions were borderline between these care levels. Responses were more consistent for interventions with relevant WHO clinical care guidelines while more variation in respondents' classification was observed in complex interventions that lack standards or guidelines. Respondents with experience in lower-income settings were more likely to assign a higher level of care for more complex interventions. Results were consistent with known challenges of scaling up inpatient care in lower-income settings and underline the importance of comprehensive guidelines and standards for inpatient care. Further work is needed to develop a shortlist of newborn signal functions aligned with emergency obstetric care levels to track universal health coverage for mothers and their newborns.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0218748</identifier><identifier>PMID: 31295262</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Public Library of Science</publisher><subject>Antibiotics ; Babies ; Bacterial infections ; Biology and Life Sciences ; Birth ; Birth weight ; Developing countries ; Emergencies ; Emergency medical care ; Emergency medical services ; Emergency medicine ; Epidemiology ; Female ; Guidelines ; Health ; Health aspects ; Hospitalization ; Hospitals ; Humans ; Hygiene ; Income ; Infant Care ; Infant mortality ; Infant, Low Birth Weight ; Infant, Newborn ; Infant, Newborn, Diseases - epidemiology ; Infant, Newborn, Diseases - physiopathology ; Infections ; Infectious diseases ; Inpatients ; International aspects ; Levels ; Low income groups ; Maternal &amp; child health ; Maternal Health Services ; Maternal mortality ; Mathematical analysis ; Medical personnel ; Medical protocols ; Medicine ; Medicine and Health Sciences ; Methods ; Mothers ; National health insurance ; Neonatal intensive care ; Neonates ; Newborn babies ; Newborn infants ; Obstetrics ; Parturition ; Patient care ; Polls &amp; surveys ; Pregnancy ; Prevention ; Quality ; Research and Analysis Methods ; Scaling ; Surveys ; Surveys and Questionnaires ; Tracking</subject><ispartof>PloS one, 2019-07, Vol.14 (7), p.e0218748-e0218748</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2019 Public Library of Science</rights><rights>This is an open access article, free of all copyright, and may be freely reproduced, distributed, transmitted, modified, built upon, or otherwise used by anyone for any lawful purpose. The work is made available under the Creative Commons CC0 public domain dedication: https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-6a8e99e342158f5f5287ae5c911fcd6d480b3bc8e1f2f90ca17c43a570336e103</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-6a8e99e342158f5f5287ae5c911fcd6d480b3bc8e1f2f90ca17c43a570336e103</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-1556-3159 ; 0000-0001-6600-6147</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6623953/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6623953/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,860,881,2096,2915,23845,27901,27902,53766,53768,79342,79343</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31295262$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Moxon, Sarah G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Blencowe, Hannah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bailey, Patricia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bradley, John</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Day, Louise Tina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ram, Pavani K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Monet, Jean-Pierre</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moran, Allisyn C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zeck, Willibald</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lawn, Joy E</creatorcontrib><title>Categorising interventions to levels of inpatient care for small and sick newborns: Findings from a global survey</title><title>PloS one</title><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><description>In 2017, 2.5 million newborns died, mainly from prematurity, infections, and intrapartum events. Preventing these deaths requires health systems to provide routine and emergency care at birth, and quality inpatient care for small and sick newborns. Defined levels of emergency obstetric care (EmOC) and standardised measurement of "signal functions" has improved tracking of maternal care in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). Levels of newborn care, particularly for small and sick newborns, and associated signal functions are still not consistently defined or tracked. Between November 2016-November 2017, we conducted an online survey of professionals working in maternal and newborn health. We asked respondents to categorise 18 clinical care interventions that could act as potential signal functions for small and sick newborns to 3 levels of care they thought were appropriate for health systems in LMICs to provide: "routine care at birth", "special care" and "intensive care". We calculated the percentage of respondents that classified each intervention at each level of care and stratified responses to look at variation by respondent characteristics. Six interventions were classified to specific levels by more than 50% of respondents as "routine care at birth," three interventions as "special care" and one as "intensive care". Eight interventions were borderline between these care levels. Responses were more consistent for interventions with relevant WHO clinical care guidelines while more variation in respondents' classification was observed in complex interventions that lack standards or guidelines. Respondents with experience in lower-income settings were more likely to assign a higher level of care for more complex interventions. Results were consistent with known challenges of scaling up inpatient care in lower-income settings and underline the importance of comprehensive guidelines and standards for inpatient care. Further work is needed to develop a shortlist of newborn signal functions aligned with emergency obstetric care levels to track universal health coverage for mothers and their newborns.</description><subject>Antibiotics</subject><subject>Babies</subject><subject>Bacterial infections</subject><subject>Biology and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Birth</subject><subject>Birth weight</subject><subject>Developing countries</subject><subject>Emergencies</subject><subject>Emergency medical care</subject><subject>Emergency medical services</subject><subject>Emergency medicine</subject><subject>Epidemiology</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Guidelines</subject><subject>Health</subject><subject>Health aspects</subject><subject>Hospitalization</subject><subject>Hospitals</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Hygiene</subject><subject>Income</subject><subject>Infant Care</subject><subject>Infant mortality</subject><subject>Infant, Low Birth Weight</subject><subject>Infant, Newborn</subject><subject>Infant, Newborn, Diseases - epidemiology</subject><subject>Infant, Newborn, Diseases - physiopathology</subject><subject>Infections</subject><subject>Infectious diseases</subject><subject>Inpatients</subject><subject>International aspects</subject><subject>Levels</subject><subject>Low income groups</subject><subject>Maternal &amp; child health</subject><subject>Maternal Health Services</subject><subject>Maternal mortality</subject><subject>Mathematical analysis</subject><subject>Medical personnel</subject><subject>Medical protocols</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine and Health Sciences</subject><subject>Methods</subject><subject>Mothers</subject><subject>National health insurance</subject><subject>Neonatal intensive care</subject><subject>Neonates</subject><subject>Newborn babies</subject><subject>Newborn infants</subject><subject>Obstetrics</subject><subject>Parturition</subject><subject>Patient care</subject><subject>Polls &amp; surveys</subject><subject>Pregnancy</subject><subject>Prevention</subject><subject>Quality</subject><subject>Research and Analysis Methods</subject><subject>Scaling</subject><subject>Surveys</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><subject>Tracking</subject><issn>1932-6203</issn><issn>1932-6203</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNqNk99vFCEQgDdGY2v1PzBKYmL04c4FFnbpg0nTWG3SpIm_XskcO2ypHFxht9r_Xq69Nj3TB7MPbJhvPmBgquolreeUt_TDeZxSAD9fxYDzmtGubbpH1S5VnM0kq_nje_871bOcz-ta8E7Kp9UOp0wJJtludXEIIw4xuezCQFwYMV1iGF0MmYyReLxEn0m0JbSC0ZUQMZCQ2JhIXoL3BEJPsjO_SMDfi5hC3idHLvRFl4lNcUmADD4uwJM8FffV8-qJBZ_xxWbcq34cffp--GV2cvr5-PDgZGakYuNMQodKIW8YFZ0VVrCuBRRGUWpNL_umqxd8YTqklllVG6CtaTiItuZcIq35XvX6xrvyMetNtbJmTEjadnXTFOL4hugjnOtVcktIVzqC09cTMQ0a0uiMRy04GEDey7aXjQKueC_q3mKrUJR9QHF93Kw2LZbYm1KoBH5Luh0J7kwP8VJLybgSvAjebQQpXkyYR7102aD3EDBO1_tupWrKZRb0zT_ow6fbUAOUA7hgY1nXrKX6QCimurZla9f8Aap8PS6dKU_LujK_lfB-K6EwI_4ZB5hy1sffvv4_e_pzm317jz1D8ONZjn66forbYHMDmhRzTmjvikxrve6M22rodWfoTWeUtFf3L-gu6bYV-F9-zQoC</recordid><startdate>20190711</startdate><enddate>20190711</enddate><creator>Moxon, Sarah G</creator><creator>Blencowe, Hannah</creator><creator>Bailey, Patricia</creator><creator>Bradley, John</creator><creator>Day, Louise Tina</creator><creator>Ram, Pavani K</creator><creator>Monet, Jean-Pierre</creator><creator>Moran, Allisyn C</creator><creator>Zeck, Willibald</creator><creator>Lawn, Joy E</creator><general>Public Library of Science</general><general>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>IOV</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1556-3159</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6600-6147</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20190711</creationdate><title>Categorising interventions to levels of inpatient care for small and sick newborns: Findings from a global survey</title><author>Moxon, Sarah G ; Blencowe, Hannah ; Bailey, Patricia ; Bradley, John ; Day, Louise Tina ; Ram, Pavani K ; Monet, Jean-Pierre ; Moran, Allisyn C ; Zeck, Willibald ; Lawn, Joy E</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-6a8e99e342158f5f5287ae5c911fcd6d480b3bc8e1f2f90ca17c43a570336e103</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Antibiotics</topic><topic>Babies</topic><topic>Bacterial infections</topic><topic>Biology and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Birth</topic><topic>Birth weight</topic><topic>Developing countries</topic><topic>Emergencies</topic><topic>Emergency medical care</topic><topic>Emergency medical services</topic><topic>Emergency medicine</topic><topic>Epidemiology</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Guidelines</topic><topic>Health</topic><topic>Health aspects</topic><topic>Hospitalization</topic><topic>Hospitals</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Hygiene</topic><topic>Income</topic><topic>Infant Care</topic><topic>Infant mortality</topic><topic>Infant, Low Birth Weight</topic><topic>Infant, Newborn</topic><topic>Infant, Newborn, Diseases - epidemiology</topic><topic>Infant, Newborn, Diseases - physiopathology</topic><topic>Infections</topic><topic>Infectious diseases</topic><topic>Inpatients</topic><topic>International aspects</topic><topic>Levels</topic><topic>Low income groups</topic><topic>Maternal &amp; child health</topic><topic>Maternal Health Services</topic><topic>Maternal mortality</topic><topic>Mathematical analysis</topic><topic>Medical personnel</topic><topic>Medical protocols</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine and Health Sciences</topic><topic>Methods</topic><topic>Mothers</topic><topic>National health insurance</topic><topic>Neonatal intensive care</topic><topic>Neonates</topic><topic>Newborn babies</topic><topic>Newborn infants</topic><topic>Obstetrics</topic><topic>Parturition</topic><topic>Patient care</topic><topic>Polls &amp; surveys</topic><topic>Pregnancy</topic><topic>Prevention</topic><topic>Quality</topic><topic>Research and Analysis Methods</topic><topic>Scaling</topic><topic>Surveys</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires</topic><topic>Tracking</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Moxon, Sarah G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Blencowe, Hannah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bailey, Patricia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bradley, John</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Day, Louise Tina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ram, Pavani K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Monet, Jean-Pierre</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moran, Allisyn C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zeck, Willibald</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lawn, Joy E</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale in Context : Opposing Viewpoints</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Proquest Nursing &amp; Allied Health Source</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Database‎ (1962 - current)</collection><collection>ProQuest Agriculture &amp; Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Biological Sciences</collection><collection>Agriculture Science Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest advanced technologies &amp; aerospace journals</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Moxon, Sarah G</au><au>Blencowe, Hannah</au><au>Bailey, Patricia</au><au>Bradley, John</au><au>Day, Louise Tina</au><au>Ram, Pavani K</au><au>Monet, Jean-Pierre</au><au>Moran, Allisyn C</au><au>Zeck, Willibald</au><au>Lawn, Joy E</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Categorising interventions to levels of inpatient care for small and sick newborns: Findings from a global survey</atitle><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><date>2019-07-11</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>14</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>e0218748</spage><epage>e0218748</epage><pages>e0218748-e0218748</pages><issn>1932-6203</issn><eissn>1932-6203</eissn><abstract>In 2017, 2.5 million newborns died, mainly from prematurity, infections, and intrapartum events. Preventing these deaths requires health systems to provide routine and emergency care at birth, and quality inpatient care for small and sick newborns. Defined levels of emergency obstetric care (EmOC) and standardised measurement of "signal functions" has improved tracking of maternal care in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). Levels of newborn care, particularly for small and sick newborns, and associated signal functions are still not consistently defined or tracked. Between November 2016-November 2017, we conducted an online survey of professionals working in maternal and newborn health. We asked respondents to categorise 18 clinical care interventions that could act as potential signal functions for small and sick newborns to 3 levels of care they thought were appropriate for health systems in LMICs to provide: "routine care at birth", "special care" and "intensive care". We calculated the percentage of respondents that classified each intervention at each level of care and stratified responses to look at variation by respondent characteristics. Six interventions were classified to specific levels by more than 50% of respondents as "routine care at birth," three interventions as "special care" and one as "intensive care". Eight interventions were borderline between these care levels. Responses were more consistent for interventions with relevant WHO clinical care guidelines while more variation in respondents' classification was observed in complex interventions that lack standards or guidelines. Respondents with experience in lower-income settings were more likely to assign a higher level of care for more complex interventions. Results were consistent with known challenges of scaling up inpatient care in lower-income settings and underline the importance of comprehensive guidelines and standards for inpatient care. Further work is needed to develop a shortlist of newborn signal functions aligned with emergency obstetric care levels to track universal health coverage for mothers and their newborns.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Public Library of Science</pub><pmid>31295262</pmid><doi>10.1371/journal.pone.0218748</doi><tpages>e0218748</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1556-3159</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6600-6147</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1932-6203
ispartof PloS one, 2019-07, Vol.14 (7), p.e0218748-e0218748
issn 1932-6203
1932-6203
language eng
recordid cdi_plos_journals_2256178044
source PLoS; MEDLINE; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; PubMed Central; Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry; EZB Electronic Journals Library
subjects Antibiotics
Babies
Bacterial infections
Biology and Life Sciences
Birth
Birth weight
Developing countries
Emergencies
Emergency medical care
Emergency medical services
Emergency medicine
Epidemiology
Female
Guidelines
Health
Health aspects
Hospitalization
Hospitals
Humans
Hygiene
Income
Infant Care
Infant mortality
Infant, Low Birth Weight
Infant, Newborn
Infant, Newborn, Diseases - epidemiology
Infant, Newborn, Diseases - physiopathology
Infections
Infectious diseases
Inpatients
International aspects
Levels
Low income groups
Maternal & child health
Maternal Health Services
Maternal mortality
Mathematical analysis
Medical personnel
Medical protocols
Medicine
Medicine and Health Sciences
Methods
Mothers
National health insurance
Neonatal intensive care
Neonates
Newborn babies
Newborn infants
Obstetrics
Parturition
Patient care
Polls & surveys
Pregnancy
Prevention
Quality
Research and Analysis Methods
Scaling
Surveys
Surveys and Questionnaires
Tracking
title Categorising interventions to levels of inpatient care for small and sick newborns: Findings from a global survey
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-07T19%3A27%3A23IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_plos_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Categorising%20interventions%20to%20levels%20of%20inpatient%20care%20for%20small%20and%20sick%20newborns:%20Findings%20from%20a%20global%20survey&rft.jtitle=PloS%20one&rft.au=Moxon,%20Sarah%20G&rft.date=2019-07-11&rft.volume=14&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=e0218748&rft.epage=e0218748&rft.pages=e0218748-e0218748&rft.issn=1932-6203&rft.eissn=1932-6203&rft_id=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0218748&rft_dat=%3Cgale_plos_%3EA592987723%3C/gale_plos_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2256178044&rft_id=info:pmid/31295262&rft_galeid=A592987723&rft_doaj_id=oai_doaj_org_article_53acae3d67d649a393d50dfe79e50b3a&rfr_iscdi=true