Categorising interventions to levels of inpatient care for small and sick newborns: Findings from a global survey
In 2017, 2.5 million newborns died, mainly from prematurity, infections, and intrapartum events. Preventing these deaths requires health systems to provide routine and emergency care at birth, and quality inpatient care for small and sick newborns. Defined levels of emergency obstetric care (EmOC) a...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | PloS one 2019-07, Vol.14 (7), p.e0218748-e0218748 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | e0218748 |
---|---|
container_issue | 7 |
container_start_page | e0218748 |
container_title | PloS one |
container_volume | 14 |
creator | Moxon, Sarah G Blencowe, Hannah Bailey, Patricia Bradley, John Day, Louise Tina Ram, Pavani K Monet, Jean-Pierre Moran, Allisyn C Zeck, Willibald Lawn, Joy E |
description | In 2017, 2.5 million newborns died, mainly from prematurity, infections, and intrapartum events. Preventing these deaths requires health systems to provide routine and emergency care at birth, and quality inpatient care for small and sick newborns. Defined levels of emergency obstetric care (EmOC) and standardised measurement of "signal functions" has improved tracking of maternal care in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). Levels of newborn care, particularly for small and sick newborns, and associated signal functions are still not consistently defined or tracked.
Between November 2016-November 2017, we conducted an online survey of professionals working in maternal and newborn health. We asked respondents to categorise 18 clinical care interventions that could act as potential signal functions for small and sick newborns to 3 levels of care they thought were appropriate for health systems in LMICs to provide: "routine care at birth", "special care" and "intensive care". We calculated the percentage of respondents that classified each intervention at each level of care and stratified responses to look at variation by respondent characteristics.
Six interventions were classified to specific levels by more than 50% of respondents as "routine care at birth," three interventions as "special care" and one as "intensive care". Eight interventions were borderline between these care levels. Responses were more consistent for interventions with relevant WHO clinical care guidelines while more variation in respondents' classification was observed in complex interventions that lack standards or guidelines. Respondents with experience in lower-income settings were more likely to assign a higher level of care for more complex interventions.
Results were consistent with known challenges of scaling up inpatient care in lower-income settings and underline the importance of comprehensive guidelines and standards for inpatient care. Further work is needed to develop a shortlist of newborn signal functions aligned with emergency obstetric care levels to track universal health coverage for mothers and their newborns. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1371/journal.pone.0218748 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_plos_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_plos_journals_2256178044</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A592987723</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_53acae3d67d649a393d50dfe79e50b3a</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A592987723</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-6a8e99e342158f5f5287ae5c911fcd6d480b3bc8e1f2f90ca17c43a570336e103</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNk99vFCEQgDdGY2v1PzBKYmL04c4FFnbpg0nTWG3SpIm_XskcO2ypHFxht9r_Xq69Nj3TB7MPbJhvPmBgquolreeUt_TDeZxSAD9fxYDzmtGubbpH1S5VnM0kq_nje_871bOcz-ta8E7Kp9UOp0wJJtludXEIIw4xuezCQFwYMV1iGF0MmYyReLxEn0m0JbSC0ZUQMZCQ2JhIXoL3BEJPsjO_SMDfi5hC3idHLvRFl4lNcUmADD4uwJM8FffV8-qJBZ_xxWbcq34cffp--GV2cvr5-PDgZGakYuNMQodKIW8YFZ0VVrCuBRRGUWpNL_umqxd8YTqklllVG6CtaTiItuZcIq35XvX6xrvyMetNtbJmTEjadnXTFOL4hugjnOtVcktIVzqC09cTMQ0a0uiMRy04GEDey7aXjQKueC_q3mKrUJR9QHF93Kw2LZbYm1KoBH5Luh0J7kwP8VJLybgSvAjebQQpXkyYR7102aD3EDBO1_tupWrKZRb0zT_ow6fbUAOUA7hgY1nXrKX6QCimurZla9f8Aap8PS6dKU_LujK_lfB-K6EwI_4ZB5hy1sffvv4_e_pzm317jz1D8ONZjn66forbYHMDmhRzTmjvikxrve6M22rodWfoTWeUtFf3L-gu6bYV-F9-zQoC</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2256178044</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Categorising interventions to levels of inpatient care for small and sick newborns: Findings from a global survey</title><source>PLoS</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry</source><source>EZB Electronic Journals Library</source><creator>Moxon, Sarah G ; Blencowe, Hannah ; Bailey, Patricia ; Bradley, John ; Day, Louise Tina ; Ram, Pavani K ; Monet, Jean-Pierre ; Moran, Allisyn C ; Zeck, Willibald ; Lawn, Joy E</creator><creatorcontrib>Moxon, Sarah G ; Blencowe, Hannah ; Bailey, Patricia ; Bradley, John ; Day, Louise Tina ; Ram, Pavani K ; Monet, Jean-Pierre ; Moran, Allisyn C ; Zeck, Willibald ; Lawn, Joy E</creatorcontrib><description>In 2017, 2.5 million newborns died, mainly from prematurity, infections, and intrapartum events. Preventing these deaths requires health systems to provide routine and emergency care at birth, and quality inpatient care for small and sick newborns. Defined levels of emergency obstetric care (EmOC) and standardised measurement of "signal functions" has improved tracking of maternal care in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). Levels of newborn care, particularly for small and sick newborns, and associated signal functions are still not consistently defined or tracked.
Between November 2016-November 2017, we conducted an online survey of professionals working in maternal and newborn health. We asked respondents to categorise 18 clinical care interventions that could act as potential signal functions for small and sick newborns to 3 levels of care they thought were appropriate for health systems in LMICs to provide: "routine care at birth", "special care" and "intensive care". We calculated the percentage of respondents that classified each intervention at each level of care and stratified responses to look at variation by respondent characteristics.
Six interventions were classified to specific levels by more than 50% of respondents as "routine care at birth," three interventions as "special care" and one as "intensive care". Eight interventions were borderline between these care levels. Responses were more consistent for interventions with relevant WHO clinical care guidelines while more variation in respondents' classification was observed in complex interventions that lack standards or guidelines. Respondents with experience in lower-income settings were more likely to assign a higher level of care for more complex interventions.
Results were consistent with known challenges of scaling up inpatient care in lower-income settings and underline the importance of comprehensive guidelines and standards for inpatient care. Further work is needed to develop a shortlist of newborn signal functions aligned with emergency obstetric care levels to track universal health coverage for mothers and their newborns.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0218748</identifier><identifier>PMID: 31295262</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Public Library of Science</publisher><subject>Antibiotics ; Babies ; Bacterial infections ; Biology and Life Sciences ; Birth ; Birth weight ; Developing countries ; Emergencies ; Emergency medical care ; Emergency medical services ; Emergency medicine ; Epidemiology ; Female ; Guidelines ; Health ; Health aspects ; Hospitalization ; Hospitals ; Humans ; Hygiene ; Income ; Infant Care ; Infant mortality ; Infant, Low Birth Weight ; Infant, Newborn ; Infant, Newborn, Diseases - epidemiology ; Infant, Newborn, Diseases - physiopathology ; Infections ; Infectious diseases ; Inpatients ; International aspects ; Levels ; Low income groups ; Maternal & child health ; Maternal Health Services ; Maternal mortality ; Mathematical analysis ; Medical personnel ; Medical protocols ; Medicine ; Medicine and Health Sciences ; Methods ; Mothers ; National health insurance ; Neonatal intensive care ; Neonates ; Newborn babies ; Newborn infants ; Obstetrics ; Parturition ; Patient care ; Polls & surveys ; Pregnancy ; Prevention ; Quality ; Research and Analysis Methods ; Scaling ; Surveys ; Surveys and Questionnaires ; Tracking</subject><ispartof>PloS one, 2019-07, Vol.14 (7), p.e0218748-e0218748</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2019 Public Library of Science</rights><rights>This is an open access article, free of all copyright, and may be freely reproduced, distributed, transmitted, modified, built upon, or otherwise used by anyone for any lawful purpose. The work is made available under the Creative Commons CC0 public domain dedication: https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-6a8e99e342158f5f5287ae5c911fcd6d480b3bc8e1f2f90ca17c43a570336e103</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-6a8e99e342158f5f5287ae5c911fcd6d480b3bc8e1f2f90ca17c43a570336e103</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-1556-3159 ; 0000-0001-6600-6147</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6623953/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6623953/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,860,881,2096,2915,23845,27901,27902,53766,53768,79342,79343</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31295262$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Moxon, Sarah G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Blencowe, Hannah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bailey, Patricia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bradley, John</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Day, Louise Tina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ram, Pavani K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Monet, Jean-Pierre</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moran, Allisyn C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zeck, Willibald</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lawn, Joy E</creatorcontrib><title>Categorising interventions to levels of inpatient care for small and sick newborns: Findings from a global survey</title><title>PloS one</title><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><description>In 2017, 2.5 million newborns died, mainly from prematurity, infections, and intrapartum events. Preventing these deaths requires health systems to provide routine and emergency care at birth, and quality inpatient care for small and sick newborns. Defined levels of emergency obstetric care (EmOC) and standardised measurement of "signal functions" has improved tracking of maternal care in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). Levels of newborn care, particularly for small and sick newborns, and associated signal functions are still not consistently defined or tracked.
Between November 2016-November 2017, we conducted an online survey of professionals working in maternal and newborn health. We asked respondents to categorise 18 clinical care interventions that could act as potential signal functions for small and sick newborns to 3 levels of care they thought were appropriate for health systems in LMICs to provide: "routine care at birth", "special care" and "intensive care". We calculated the percentage of respondents that classified each intervention at each level of care and stratified responses to look at variation by respondent characteristics.
Six interventions were classified to specific levels by more than 50% of respondents as "routine care at birth," three interventions as "special care" and one as "intensive care". Eight interventions were borderline between these care levels. Responses were more consistent for interventions with relevant WHO clinical care guidelines while more variation in respondents' classification was observed in complex interventions that lack standards or guidelines. Respondents with experience in lower-income settings were more likely to assign a higher level of care for more complex interventions.
Results were consistent with known challenges of scaling up inpatient care in lower-income settings and underline the importance of comprehensive guidelines and standards for inpatient care. Further work is needed to develop a shortlist of newborn signal functions aligned with emergency obstetric care levels to track universal health coverage for mothers and their newborns.</description><subject>Antibiotics</subject><subject>Babies</subject><subject>Bacterial infections</subject><subject>Biology and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Birth</subject><subject>Birth weight</subject><subject>Developing countries</subject><subject>Emergencies</subject><subject>Emergency medical care</subject><subject>Emergency medical services</subject><subject>Emergency medicine</subject><subject>Epidemiology</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Guidelines</subject><subject>Health</subject><subject>Health aspects</subject><subject>Hospitalization</subject><subject>Hospitals</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Hygiene</subject><subject>Income</subject><subject>Infant Care</subject><subject>Infant mortality</subject><subject>Infant, Low Birth Weight</subject><subject>Infant, Newborn</subject><subject>Infant, Newborn, Diseases - epidemiology</subject><subject>Infant, Newborn, Diseases - physiopathology</subject><subject>Infections</subject><subject>Infectious diseases</subject><subject>Inpatients</subject><subject>International aspects</subject><subject>Levels</subject><subject>Low income groups</subject><subject>Maternal & child health</subject><subject>Maternal Health Services</subject><subject>Maternal mortality</subject><subject>Mathematical analysis</subject><subject>Medical personnel</subject><subject>Medical protocols</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine and Health Sciences</subject><subject>Methods</subject><subject>Mothers</subject><subject>National health insurance</subject><subject>Neonatal intensive care</subject><subject>Neonates</subject><subject>Newborn babies</subject><subject>Newborn infants</subject><subject>Obstetrics</subject><subject>Parturition</subject><subject>Patient care</subject><subject>Polls & surveys</subject><subject>Pregnancy</subject><subject>Prevention</subject><subject>Quality</subject><subject>Research and Analysis Methods</subject><subject>Scaling</subject><subject>Surveys</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><subject>Tracking</subject><issn>1932-6203</issn><issn>1932-6203</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNqNk99vFCEQgDdGY2v1PzBKYmL04c4FFnbpg0nTWG3SpIm_XskcO2ypHFxht9r_Xq69Nj3TB7MPbJhvPmBgquolreeUt_TDeZxSAD9fxYDzmtGubbpH1S5VnM0kq_nje_871bOcz-ta8E7Kp9UOp0wJJtludXEIIw4xuezCQFwYMV1iGF0MmYyReLxEn0m0JbSC0ZUQMZCQ2JhIXoL3BEJPsjO_SMDfi5hC3idHLvRFl4lNcUmADD4uwJM8FffV8-qJBZ_xxWbcq34cffp--GV2cvr5-PDgZGakYuNMQodKIW8YFZ0VVrCuBRRGUWpNL_umqxd8YTqklllVG6CtaTiItuZcIq35XvX6xrvyMetNtbJmTEjadnXTFOL4hugjnOtVcktIVzqC09cTMQ0a0uiMRy04GEDey7aXjQKueC_q3mKrUJR9QHF93Kw2LZbYm1KoBH5Luh0J7kwP8VJLybgSvAjebQQpXkyYR7102aD3EDBO1_tupWrKZRb0zT_ow6fbUAOUA7hgY1nXrKX6QCimurZla9f8Aap8PS6dKU_LujK_lfB-K6EwI_4ZB5hy1sffvv4_e_pzm317jz1D8ONZjn66forbYHMDmhRzTmjvikxrve6M22rodWfoTWeUtFf3L-gu6bYV-F9-zQoC</recordid><startdate>20190711</startdate><enddate>20190711</enddate><creator>Moxon, Sarah G</creator><creator>Blencowe, Hannah</creator><creator>Bailey, Patricia</creator><creator>Bradley, John</creator><creator>Day, Louise Tina</creator><creator>Ram, Pavani K</creator><creator>Monet, Jean-Pierre</creator><creator>Moran, Allisyn C</creator><creator>Zeck, Willibald</creator><creator>Lawn, Joy E</creator><general>Public Library of Science</general><general>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>IOV</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1556-3159</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6600-6147</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20190711</creationdate><title>Categorising interventions to levels of inpatient care for small and sick newborns: Findings from a global survey</title><author>Moxon, Sarah G ; Blencowe, Hannah ; Bailey, Patricia ; Bradley, John ; Day, Louise Tina ; Ram, Pavani K ; Monet, Jean-Pierre ; Moran, Allisyn C ; Zeck, Willibald ; Lawn, Joy E</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-6a8e99e342158f5f5287ae5c911fcd6d480b3bc8e1f2f90ca17c43a570336e103</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Antibiotics</topic><topic>Babies</topic><topic>Bacterial infections</topic><topic>Biology and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Birth</topic><topic>Birth weight</topic><topic>Developing countries</topic><topic>Emergencies</topic><topic>Emergency medical care</topic><topic>Emergency medical services</topic><topic>Emergency medicine</topic><topic>Epidemiology</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Guidelines</topic><topic>Health</topic><topic>Health aspects</topic><topic>Hospitalization</topic><topic>Hospitals</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Hygiene</topic><topic>Income</topic><topic>Infant Care</topic><topic>Infant mortality</topic><topic>Infant, Low Birth Weight</topic><topic>Infant, Newborn</topic><topic>Infant, Newborn, Diseases - epidemiology</topic><topic>Infant, Newborn, Diseases - physiopathology</topic><topic>Infections</topic><topic>Infectious diseases</topic><topic>Inpatients</topic><topic>International aspects</topic><topic>Levels</topic><topic>Low income groups</topic><topic>Maternal & child health</topic><topic>Maternal Health Services</topic><topic>Maternal mortality</topic><topic>Mathematical analysis</topic><topic>Medical personnel</topic><topic>Medical protocols</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine and Health Sciences</topic><topic>Methods</topic><topic>Mothers</topic><topic>National health insurance</topic><topic>Neonatal intensive care</topic><topic>Neonates</topic><topic>Newborn babies</topic><topic>Newborn infants</topic><topic>Obstetrics</topic><topic>Parturition</topic><topic>Patient care</topic><topic>Polls & surveys</topic><topic>Pregnancy</topic><topic>Prevention</topic><topic>Quality</topic><topic>Research and Analysis Methods</topic><topic>Scaling</topic><topic>Surveys</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires</topic><topic>Tracking</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Moxon, Sarah G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Blencowe, Hannah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bailey, Patricia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bradley, John</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Day, Louise Tina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ram, Pavani K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Monet, Jean-Pierre</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moran, Allisyn C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zeck, Willibald</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lawn, Joy E</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale in Context : Opposing Viewpoints</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Proquest Nursing & Allied Health Source</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database (1962 - current)</collection><collection>ProQuest Agriculture & Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Biological Sciences</collection><collection>Agriculture Science Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest advanced technologies & aerospace journals</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Moxon, Sarah G</au><au>Blencowe, Hannah</au><au>Bailey, Patricia</au><au>Bradley, John</au><au>Day, Louise Tina</au><au>Ram, Pavani K</au><au>Monet, Jean-Pierre</au><au>Moran, Allisyn C</au><au>Zeck, Willibald</au><au>Lawn, Joy E</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Categorising interventions to levels of inpatient care for small and sick newborns: Findings from a global survey</atitle><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><date>2019-07-11</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>14</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>e0218748</spage><epage>e0218748</epage><pages>e0218748-e0218748</pages><issn>1932-6203</issn><eissn>1932-6203</eissn><abstract>In 2017, 2.5 million newborns died, mainly from prematurity, infections, and intrapartum events. Preventing these deaths requires health systems to provide routine and emergency care at birth, and quality inpatient care for small and sick newborns. Defined levels of emergency obstetric care (EmOC) and standardised measurement of "signal functions" has improved tracking of maternal care in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). Levels of newborn care, particularly for small and sick newborns, and associated signal functions are still not consistently defined or tracked.
Between November 2016-November 2017, we conducted an online survey of professionals working in maternal and newborn health. We asked respondents to categorise 18 clinical care interventions that could act as potential signal functions for small and sick newborns to 3 levels of care they thought were appropriate for health systems in LMICs to provide: "routine care at birth", "special care" and "intensive care". We calculated the percentage of respondents that classified each intervention at each level of care and stratified responses to look at variation by respondent characteristics.
Six interventions were classified to specific levels by more than 50% of respondents as "routine care at birth," three interventions as "special care" and one as "intensive care". Eight interventions were borderline between these care levels. Responses were more consistent for interventions with relevant WHO clinical care guidelines while more variation in respondents' classification was observed in complex interventions that lack standards or guidelines. Respondents with experience in lower-income settings were more likely to assign a higher level of care for more complex interventions.
Results were consistent with known challenges of scaling up inpatient care in lower-income settings and underline the importance of comprehensive guidelines and standards for inpatient care. Further work is needed to develop a shortlist of newborn signal functions aligned with emergency obstetric care levels to track universal health coverage for mothers and their newborns.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Public Library of Science</pub><pmid>31295262</pmid><doi>10.1371/journal.pone.0218748</doi><tpages>e0218748</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1556-3159</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6600-6147</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1932-6203 |
ispartof | PloS one, 2019-07, Vol.14 (7), p.e0218748-e0218748 |
issn | 1932-6203 1932-6203 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_plos_journals_2256178044 |
source | PLoS; MEDLINE; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; PubMed Central; Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry; EZB Electronic Journals Library |
subjects | Antibiotics Babies Bacterial infections Biology and Life Sciences Birth Birth weight Developing countries Emergencies Emergency medical care Emergency medical services Emergency medicine Epidemiology Female Guidelines Health Health aspects Hospitalization Hospitals Humans Hygiene Income Infant Care Infant mortality Infant, Low Birth Weight Infant, Newborn Infant, Newborn, Diseases - epidemiology Infant, Newborn, Diseases - physiopathology Infections Infectious diseases Inpatients International aspects Levels Low income groups Maternal & child health Maternal Health Services Maternal mortality Mathematical analysis Medical personnel Medical protocols Medicine Medicine and Health Sciences Methods Mothers National health insurance Neonatal intensive care Neonates Newborn babies Newborn infants Obstetrics Parturition Patient care Polls & surveys Pregnancy Prevention Quality Research and Analysis Methods Scaling Surveys Surveys and Questionnaires Tracking |
title | Categorising interventions to levels of inpatient care for small and sick newborns: Findings from a global survey |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-07T19%3A27%3A23IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_plos_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Categorising%20interventions%20to%20levels%20of%20inpatient%20care%20for%20small%20and%20sick%20newborns:%20Findings%20from%20a%20global%20survey&rft.jtitle=PloS%20one&rft.au=Moxon,%20Sarah%20G&rft.date=2019-07-11&rft.volume=14&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=e0218748&rft.epage=e0218748&rft.pages=e0218748-e0218748&rft.issn=1932-6203&rft.eissn=1932-6203&rft_id=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0218748&rft_dat=%3Cgale_plos_%3EA592987723%3C/gale_plos_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2256178044&rft_id=info:pmid/31295262&rft_galeid=A592987723&rft_doaj_id=oai_doaj_org_article_53acae3d67d649a393d50dfe79e50b3a&rfr_iscdi=true |