Comprehensive evaluation of total corneal refractive power by ray tracing in predicting corneal power in eyes after small incision lenticule extraction
To assess the prediction accuracy of four variations of total corneal refractive power (TCRP) by the ray tracing method in determining corneal power in eyes after myopic small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE). Forty eyes of forty patients who had undergone myopic SMILE were enrolled in this pro...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | PloS one 2019-06, Vol.14 (6), p.e0217478 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | 6 |
container_start_page | e0217478 |
container_title | PloS one |
container_volume | 14 |
creator | Pan, Chao Tan, Weina Hua, Yanjun Lei, Xiaohua |
description | To assess the prediction accuracy of four variations of total corneal refractive power (TCRP) by the ray tracing method in determining corneal power in eyes after myopic small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE).
Forty eyes of forty patients who had undergone myopic SMILE were enrolled in this prospective study. Manifest refraction and Pentacam HR were performed preoperatively and three months or more postoperatively. Mean keratometry (Km), true net power (TNP), equivalent keratometry readings (EKR) and 4 subtypes of TCRP (pupil centered or apex centered within a ring or a zone)-TCRPpupil,ring, TCRPpupil,zone, TCRPapex,ring and TCRPapex,zone-were recorded and compared to the theoretical postoperative keratometry value using the clinical history method (CHM).
The only keratometric values that showed no statistically significant differences from the CHM were 4.0 mm and 4.5 mm EKR, 6.0 mm TCRPpupil,zone and TCRPapex,zone. Pearson's correlation test revealed that 4.0 mm TCRPpupil,zone exhibited the highest correlation coefficient (r = 0.974) followed by TCRPapex,zone 4.0 mm (0.972) and EKR 4.5 mm (0.970). The 95% limits of agreement (LOA) of the 4.0 mm EKR and CHM, the 4.5 mm EKR and CHM, the 6.0 mm TCRPpupil,zone and CHM, the 6.0 mm TCRPapex,zone and CHM were (-1.27 to 1.22 D), (-1.04 to 0.98 D), (-1.39 to 1.08 D) and (-1.38 to 0.96 D), respectively, while the modified 4.0 mm TCRPpupil,zone (TCRPpuil,zone + 0.70 D) and TCRPapex,zone (TCRPapex,zone+0.70 D) yielded the narrowest 95% LOA of (-0.96 to 0.95 D) and (-0.96D, 1.05 D).
Total corneal refractive power using the ray tracing method could predict corrected corneal power derived from the CHM in eyes following SMILE surgery after simple modification. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1371/journal.pone.0217478 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_plos_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_plos_journals_2236161673</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A587945296</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_aed426889f9749aab6887e311e917ed8</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A587945296</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-f02e9a445cbdf3c1ef339adeded1f4d2ab52747cfce168630cdf590502353ced3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNk82O0zAQgCMEYpeFN0AQCQnBoSW2kzi5IK0qfiqttBJ_V8t1xq1Xjl3spNAn4XWZbNNVg_aA5mB7_M2MZzyTJM9JNieMk3c3vg9O2vnWO5hnlPCcVw-Sc1IzOitpxh6e7M-SJzHeZFnBqrJ8nJwxQnhGOT1P_ix8uw2wARfNDlLYSdvLzniXep12vpM2VT44wDWADlJ1A7b1vyCkq30a5D7tUGvcOjUuRU-NQQRPR6sDinewh5hK3eEpttJa1CkTh0gWXGdUbzH87-42hHdPk0da2gjPxvUi-f7xw7fF59nV9afl4vJqpsqadjOdUahlnhdq1WimCGjGatkACtF5Q-WqoFgYpRWQsipZphpd1FmRUVYwBQ27SF4e_G6tj2KsaRSUspKgcIbE8kA0Xt6IbTCtDHvhpRG3Ch_WQgZ8vwUhoclpWVW1rnleS7nCPQcsNtSEQ1Ohr_djtH7VQqMw8SDtxOn0xpmNWPudKIuCccrRwZvRQfA_e4idaE1UYK104Pvh3TmtMNNiQF_9g96f3UitJSZgnPbDDwxOxWVR8TovaF0iNb-HQmmgNQobUBvUTwzeTgyQ6fBz17KPUSy_fvl_9vrHlH19wm6wwbpN9LYfWiZOwfwAquBjxNa9KzLJxDA_x2qIYX7EOD9o9uL0g-6MjgPD_gInkRoM</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2236161673</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comprehensive evaluation of total corneal refractive power by ray tracing in predicting corneal power in eyes after small incision lenticule extraction</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry</source><creator>Pan, Chao ; Tan, Weina ; Hua, Yanjun ; Lei, Xiaohua</creator><contributor>Grulkowski, Ireneusz</contributor><creatorcontrib>Pan, Chao ; Tan, Weina ; Hua, Yanjun ; Lei, Xiaohua ; Grulkowski, Ireneusz</creatorcontrib><description>To assess the prediction accuracy of four variations of total corneal refractive power (TCRP) by the ray tracing method in determining corneal power in eyes after myopic small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE).
Forty eyes of forty patients who had undergone myopic SMILE were enrolled in this prospective study. Manifest refraction and Pentacam HR were performed preoperatively and three months or more postoperatively. Mean keratometry (Km), true net power (TNP), equivalent keratometry readings (EKR) and 4 subtypes of TCRP (pupil centered or apex centered within a ring or a zone)-TCRPpupil,ring, TCRPpupil,zone, TCRPapex,ring and TCRPapex,zone-were recorded and compared to the theoretical postoperative keratometry value using the clinical history method (CHM).
The only keratometric values that showed no statistically significant differences from the CHM were 4.0 mm and 4.5 mm EKR, 6.0 mm TCRPpupil,zone and TCRPapex,zone. Pearson's correlation test revealed that 4.0 mm TCRPpupil,zone exhibited the highest correlation coefficient (r = 0.974) followed by TCRPapex,zone 4.0 mm (0.972) and EKR 4.5 mm (0.970). The 95% limits of agreement (LOA) of the 4.0 mm EKR and CHM, the 4.5 mm EKR and CHM, the 6.0 mm TCRPpupil,zone and CHM, the 6.0 mm TCRPapex,zone and CHM were (-1.27 to 1.22 D), (-1.04 to 0.98 D), (-1.39 to 1.08 D) and (-1.38 to 0.96 D), respectively, while the modified 4.0 mm TCRPpupil,zone (TCRPpuil,zone + 0.70 D) and TCRPapex,zone (TCRPapex,zone+0.70 D) yielded the narrowest 95% LOA of (-0.96 to 0.95 D) and (-0.96D, 1.05 D).
Total corneal refractive power using the ray tracing method could predict corrected corneal power derived from the CHM in eyes following SMILE surgery after simple modification.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0217478</identifier><identifier>PMID: 31170272</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Public Library of Science</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Adult ; Astigmatism ; Astigmatism - pathology ; Astigmatism - physiopathology ; Astigmatism - surgery ; Biology and Life Sciences ; Cameras ; Cataracts ; Contact lenses ; Cornea ; Cornea - pathology ; Cornea - physiopathology ; Cornea - surgery ; Correlation ; Correlation coefficient ; Correlation coefficients ; Diagnosis ; Energy management ; Eye diseases ; Eye surgery ; Female ; Follow-Up Studies ; Hospitals ; Humans ; Laser surgery ; Male ; Medical imaging ; Medicine and Health Sciences ; Methods ; Myopia - pathology ; Myopia - physiopathology ; Myopia - surgery ; Optics ; Patients ; Physical Sciences ; Predictions ; Ray tracing ; Refraction ; Refractive Surgical Procedures ; Research and Analysis Methods ; Statistical analysis ; Surgery ; Visual Acuity</subject><ispartof>PloS one, 2019-06, Vol.14 (6), p.e0217478</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2019 Public Library of Science</rights><rights>2019 Pan et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>2019 Pan et al 2019 Pan et al</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-f02e9a445cbdf3c1ef339adeded1f4d2ab52747cfce168630cdf590502353ced3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-f02e9a445cbdf3c1ef339adeded1f4d2ab52747cfce168630cdf590502353ced3</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-5344-0171</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6553727/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6553727/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,724,777,781,861,882,2096,2915,23847,27905,27906,53772,53774,79349,79350</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31170272$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Grulkowski, Ireneusz</contributor><creatorcontrib>Pan, Chao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tan, Weina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hua, Yanjun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lei, Xiaohua</creatorcontrib><title>Comprehensive evaluation of total corneal refractive power by ray tracing in predicting corneal power in eyes after small incision lenticule extraction</title><title>PloS one</title><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><description>To assess the prediction accuracy of four variations of total corneal refractive power (TCRP) by the ray tracing method in determining corneal power in eyes after myopic small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE).
Forty eyes of forty patients who had undergone myopic SMILE were enrolled in this prospective study. Manifest refraction and Pentacam HR were performed preoperatively and three months or more postoperatively. Mean keratometry (Km), true net power (TNP), equivalent keratometry readings (EKR) and 4 subtypes of TCRP (pupil centered or apex centered within a ring or a zone)-TCRPpupil,ring, TCRPpupil,zone, TCRPapex,ring and TCRPapex,zone-were recorded and compared to the theoretical postoperative keratometry value using the clinical history method (CHM).
The only keratometric values that showed no statistically significant differences from the CHM were 4.0 mm and 4.5 mm EKR, 6.0 mm TCRPpupil,zone and TCRPapex,zone. Pearson's correlation test revealed that 4.0 mm TCRPpupil,zone exhibited the highest correlation coefficient (r = 0.974) followed by TCRPapex,zone 4.0 mm (0.972) and EKR 4.5 mm (0.970). The 95% limits of agreement (LOA) of the 4.0 mm EKR and CHM, the 4.5 mm EKR and CHM, the 6.0 mm TCRPpupil,zone and CHM, the 6.0 mm TCRPapex,zone and CHM were (-1.27 to 1.22 D), (-1.04 to 0.98 D), (-1.39 to 1.08 D) and (-1.38 to 0.96 D), respectively, while the modified 4.0 mm TCRPpupil,zone (TCRPpuil,zone + 0.70 D) and TCRPapex,zone (TCRPapex,zone+0.70 D) yielded the narrowest 95% LOA of (-0.96 to 0.95 D) and (-0.96D, 1.05 D).
Total corneal refractive power using the ray tracing method could predict corrected corneal power derived from the CHM in eyes following SMILE surgery after simple modification.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Astigmatism</subject><subject>Astigmatism - pathology</subject><subject>Astigmatism - physiopathology</subject><subject>Astigmatism - surgery</subject><subject>Biology and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Cameras</subject><subject>Cataracts</subject><subject>Contact lenses</subject><subject>Cornea</subject><subject>Cornea - pathology</subject><subject>Cornea - physiopathology</subject><subject>Cornea - surgery</subject><subject>Correlation</subject><subject>Correlation coefficient</subject><subject>Correlation coefficients</subject><subject>Diagnosis</subject><subject>Energy management</subject><subject>Eye diseases</subject><subject>Eye surgery</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Follow-Up Studies</subject><subject>Hospitals</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Laser surgery</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical imaging</subject><subject>Medicine and Health Sciences</subject><subject>Methods</subject><subject>Myopia - pathology</subject><subject>Myopia - physiopathology</subject><subject>Myopia - surgery</subject><subject>Optics</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Physical Sciences</subject><subject>Predictions</subject><subject>Ray tracing</subject><subject>Refraction</subject><subject>Refractive Surgical Procedures</subject><subject>Research and Analysis Methods</subject><subject>Statistical analysis</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>Visual Acuity</subject><issn>1932-6203</issn><issn>1932-6203</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNqNk82O0zAQgCMEYpeFN0AQCQnBoSW2kzi5IK0qfiqttBJ_V8t1xq1Xjl3spNAn4XWZbNNVg_aA5mB7_M2MZzyTJM9JNieMk3c3vg9O2vnWO5hnlPCcVw-Sc1IzOitpxh6e7M-SJzHeZFnBqrJ8nJwxQnhGOT1P_ix8uw2wARfNDlLYSdvLzniXep12vpM2VT44wDWADlJ1A7b1vyCkq30a5D7tUGvcOjUuRU-NQQRPR6sDinewh5hK3eEpttJa1CkTh0gWXGdUbzH87-42hHdPk0da2gjPxvUi-f7xw7fF59nV9afl4vJqpsqadjOdUahlnhdq1WimCGjGatkACtF5Q-WqoFgYpRWQsipZphpd1FmRUVYwBQ27SF4e_G6tj2KsaRSUspKgcIbE8kA0Xt6IbTCtDHvhpRG3Ch_WQgZ8vwUhoclpWVW1rnleS7nCPQcsNtSEQ1Ohr_djtH7VQqMw8SDtxOn0xpmNWPudKIuCccrRwZvRQfA_e4idaE1UYK104Pvh3TmtMNNiQF_9g96f3UitJSZgnPbDDwxOxWVR8TovaF0iNb-HQmmgNQobUBvUTwzeTgyQ6fBz17KPUSy_fvl_9vrHlH19wm6wwbpN9LYfWiZOwfwAquBjxNa9KzLJxDA_x2qIYX7EOD9o9uL0g-6MjgPD_gInkRoM</recordid><startdate>20190606</startdate><enddate>20190606</enddate><creator>Pan, Chao</creator><creator>Tan, Weina</creator><creator>Hua, Yanjun</creator><creator>Lei, Xiaohua</creator><general>Public Library of Science</general><general>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>IOV</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5344-0171</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20190606</creationdate><title>Comprehensive evaluation of total corneal refractive power by ray tracing in predicting corneal power in eyes after small incision lenticule extraction</title><author>Pan, Chao ; Tan, Weina ; Hua, Yanjun ; Lei, Xiaohua</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-f02e9a445cbdf3c1ef339adeded1f4d2ab52747cfce168630cdf590502353ced3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Astigmatism</topic><topic>Astigmatism - pathology</topic><topic>Astigmatism - physiopathology</topic><topic>Astigmatism - surgery</topic><topic>Biology and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Cameras</topic><topic>Cataracts</topic><topic>Contact lenses</topic><topic>Cornea</topic><topic>Cornea - pathology</topic><topic>Cornea - physiopathology</topic><topic>Cornea - surgery</topic><topic>Correlation</topic><topic>Correlation coefficient</topic><topic>Correlation coefficients</topic><topic>Diagnosis</topic><topic>Energy management</topic><topic>Eye diseases</topic><topic>Eye surgery</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Follow-Up Studies</topic><topic>Hospitals</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Laser surgery</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical imaging</topic><topic>Medicine and Health Sciences</topic><topic>Methods</topic><topic>Myopia - pathology</topic><topic>Myopia - physiopathology</topic><topic>Myopia - surgery</topic><topic>Optics</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Physical Sciences</topic><topic>Predictions</topic><topic>Ray tracing</topic><topic>Refraction</topic><topic>Refractive Surgical Procedures</topic><topic>Research and Analysis Methods</topic><topic>Statistical analysis</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>Visual Acuity</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Pan, Chao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tan, Weina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hua, Yanjun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lei, Xiaohua</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Opposing Viewpoints</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Materials Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Pan, Chao</au><au>Tan, Weina</au><au>Hua, Yanjun</au><au>Lei, Xiaohua</au><au>Grulkowski, Ireneusz</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comprehensive evaluation of total corneal refractive power by ray tracing in predicting corneal power in eyes after small incision lenticule extraction</atitle><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><date>2019-06-06</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>14</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>e0217478</spage><pages>e0217478-</pages><issn>1932-6203</issn><eissn>1932-6203</eissn><abstract>To assess the prediction accuracy of four variations of total corneal refractive power (TCRP) by the ray tracing method in determining corneal power in eyes after myopic small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE).
Forty eyes of forty patients who had undergone myopic SMILE were enrolled in this prospective study. Manifest refraction and Pentacam HR were performed preoperatively and three months or more postoperatively. Mean keratometry (Km), true net power (TNP), equivalent keratometry readings (EKR) and 4 subtypes of TCRP (pupil centered or apex centered within a ring or a zone)-TCRPpupil,ring, TCRPpupil,zone, TCRPapex,ring and TCRPapex,zone-were recorded and compared to the theoretical postoperative keratometry value using the clinical history method (CHM).
The only keratometric values that showed no statistically significant differences from the CHM were 4.0 mm and 4.5 mm EKR, 6.0 mm TCRPpupil,zone and TCRPapex,zone. Pearson's correlation test revealed that 4.0 mm TCRPpupil,zone exhibited the highest correlation coefficient (r = 0.974) followed by TCRPapex,zone 4.0 mm (0.972) and EKR 4.5 mm (0.970). The 95% limits of agreement (LOA) of the 4.0 mm EKR and CHM, the 4.5 mm EKR and CHM, the 6.0 mm TCRPpupil,zone and CHM, the 6.0 mm TCRPapex,zone and CHM were (-1.27 to 1.22 D), (-1.04 to 0.98 D), (-1.39 to 1.08 D) and (-1.38 to 0.96 D), respectively, while the modified 4.0 mm TCRPpupil,zone (TCRPpuil,zone + 0.70 D) and TCRPapex,zone (TCRPapex,zone+0.70 D) yielded the narrowest 95% LOA of (-0.96 to 0.95 D) and (-0.96D, 1.05 D).
Total corneal refractive power using the ray tracing method could predict corrected corneal power derived from the CHM in eyes following SMILE surgery after simple modification.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Public Library of Science</pub><pmid>31170272</pmid><doi>10.1371/journal.pone.0217478</doi><tpages>e0217478</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5344-0171</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1932-6203 |
ispartof | PloS one, 2019-06, Vol.14 (6), p.e0217478 |
issn | 1932-6203 1932-6203 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_plos_journals_2236161673 |
source | MEDLINE; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Public Library of Science (PLoS); PubMed Central; Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry |
subjects | Adolescent Adult Astigmatism Astigmatism - pathology Astigmatism - physiopathology Astigmatism - surgery Biology and Life Sciences Cameras Cataracts Contact lenses Cornea Cornea - pathology Cornea - physiopathology Cornea - surgery Correlation Correlation coefficient Correlation coefficients Diagnosis Energy management Eye diseases Eye surgery Female Follow-Up Studies Hospitals Humans Laser surgery Male Medical imaging Medicine and Health Sciences Methods Myopia - pathology Myopia - physiopathology Myopia - surgery Optics Patients Physical Sciences Predictions Ray tracing Refraction Refractive Surgical Procedures Research and Analysis Methods Statistical analysis Surgery Visual Acuity |
title | Comprehensive evaluation of total corneal refractive power by ray tracing in predicting corneal power in eyes after small incision lenticule extraction |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-19T21%3A45%3A55IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_plos_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comprehensive%20evaluation%20of%20total%20corneal%20refractive%20power%20by%20ray%20tracing%20in%20predicting%20corneal%20power%20in%20eyes%20after%20small%20incision%20lenticule%20extraction&rft.jtitle=PloS%20one&rft.au=Pan,%20Chao&rft.date=2019-06-06&rft.volume=14&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=e0217478&rft.pages=e0217478-&rft.issn=1932-6203&rft.eissn=1932-6203&rft_id=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0217478&rft_dat=%3Cgale_plos_%3EA587945296%3C/gale_plos_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2236161673&rft_id=info:pmid/31170272&rft_galeid=A587945296&rft_doaj_id=oai_doaj_org_article_aed426889f9749aab6887e311e917ed8&rfr_iscdi=true |