Do our risk preferences change when we make decisions for others? A meta-analysis of self-other differences in decisions involving risk
Are we more risk-averse or risk-seeking when we make decisions on behalf of other people as opposed to ourselves? So far, findings have not been able to provide a clear and consistent answer. We propose a meta-analysis to assess whether self-other differences vary according to particular features of...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | PloS one 2019-05, Vol.14 (5), p.e0216566-e0216566 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | e0216566 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 5 |
| container_start_page | e0216566 |
| container_title | PloS one |
| container_volume | 14 |
| creator | Batteux, Eleonore Ferguson, Eamonn Tunney, Richard J |
| description | Are we more risk-averse or risk-seeking when we make decisions on behalf of other people as opposed to ourselves? So far, findings have not been able to provide a clear and consistent answer.
We propose a meta-analysis to assess whether self-other differences vary according to particular features of the decision. We reviewed 78 effect sizes from 49 studies (7,576 participants).
There was no overall self-other difference, but there were moderating effects of domain and frame. Decisions in the interpersonal domain were more risk-averse for self than for other. Decisions in the medical domain were more risk-seeking for self than for other. There were no overall self-other differences in the financial domain, however there was a moderating effect of frame: decisions in a gain frame were more risk-averse for self than other whereas decisions in a loss frame were more risk-seeking for self than other. This effect of frame was slightly different overall and in the medical domain, where self-other differences occurred in a loss frame but not in a gain frame.
Future work should continue to investigate how the specific content and context of the decision impacts self-other differences in order to understand the effects of domain and frame we report. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1371/journal.pone.0216566 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_plos_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_plos_journals_2221840382</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A584800373</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_7ad4e114015c4ce5a594a8d03a7225c8</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A584800373</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-e2e746c676e94a807501fb76ebfb2d9e08f659a919561867d4c50573e6e1200e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNk9uO0zAQhiMEYpeFN0BgCQnBRYoPsZPcgKrlVGmllTjdWq4zad1N7a6ddNkn4LVx2mzVoL1AvvDpm3_G45kkeU7whLCcvFu5zlvVTDbOwgRTIrgQD5JTUjKaCorZw6P1SfIkhBXGnBVCPE5OGMEipwU7Tf58dCgKIW_CFdp4qMGD1RCQXiq7AHSzBItuAK3VFaAKtAnG2YBq55Frl-DDBzRFa2hVqmIwt8EE5GoUoKnT3T2qTH3QNPZIwtita7bGLna-nyaPatUEeDbMZ8nPz59-nH9NLy6_zM6nF6kWJW1ToJBnQotcQJmpAucck3oed_N6TqsScFELXqqSlFyQQuRVpjnmOQMBhGIM7Cx5udfdNC7IIYdBUkpJkWFW0EjM9kTl1EpuvFkrfyudMnJ34PxCKt8a3YDMVZUBIRkmXGcauOJ9UBVmKqeU6yJqvR-8dfM1VBps61UzEh3fWLOUC7eVoo8651HgzSDg3XUHoZVrEzQ0jbLguj5uRkqMS5pF9NU_6P2vG6iFig8wtnbRr-5F5ZQXWYExy1mkJvdQcVSwNjoWXG3i-cjg7cggMi38bheqC0HOvn_7f_by15h9fcQuQTXtMrima_sSGoPZHtTehRDr-JBkgmXfL3fZkH2_yKFfotmL4w86GN01CPsLEQkQRA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2221840382</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Do our risk preferences change when we make decisions for others? A meta-analysis of self-other differences in decisions involving risk</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Public Library of Science (PLoS) Journals Open Access</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry</source><creator>Batteux, Eleonore ; Ferguson, Eamonn ; Tunney, Richard J</creator><contributor>Brañas-Garza, Pablo</contributor><creatorcontrib>Batteux, Eleonore ; Ferguson, Eamonn ; Tunney, Richard J ; Brañas-Garza, Pablo</creatorcontrib><description>Are we more risk-averse or risk-seeking when we make decisions on behalf of other people as opposed to ourselves? So far, findings have not been able to provide a clear and consistent answer.
We propose a meta-analysis to assess whether self-other differences vary according to particular features of the decision. We reviewed 78 effect sizes from 49 studies (7,576 participants).
There was no overall self-other difference, but there were moderating effects of domain and frame. Decisions in the interpersonal domain were more risk-averse for self than for other. Decisions in the medical domain were more risk-seeking for self than for other. There were no overall self-other differences in the financial domain, however there was a moderating effect of frame: decisions in a gain frame were more risk-averse for self than other whereas decisions in a loss frame were more risk-seeking for self than other. This effect of frame was slightly different overall and in the medical domain, where self-other differences occurred in a loss frame but not in a gain frame.
Future work should continue to investigate how the specific content and context of the decision impacts self-other differences in order to understand the effects of domain and frame we report.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0216566</identifier><identifier>PMID: 31067283</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Public Library of Science</publisher><subject>Analysis ; Biology and Life Sciences ; Choice Behavior ; Confidence intervals ; Decision analysis ; Decision Making ; Decisions ; Financial Management ; Humans ; Internet ; Interpersonal Relations ; Medical ethics ; Medicine ; Medicine and Health Sciences ; Meta-analysis ; Meta-Analysis as Topic ; Models, Theoretical ; Physical Sciences ; Research and Analysis Methods ; Research methodology ; Risk ; Risk aversion ; Risk perception ; Risk taking ; Science Policy ; Social Sciences ; Systematic review</subject><ispartof>PloS one, 2019-05, Vol.14 (5), p.e0216566-e0216566</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2019 Public Library of Science</rights><rights>2019 Batteux et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>2019 Batteux et al 2019 Batteux et al</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-e2e746c676e94a807501fb76ebfb2d9e08f659a919561867d4c50573e6e1200e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-e2e746c676e94a807501fb76ebfb2d9e08f659a919561867d4c50573e6e1200e3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-5494-7385 ; 0000-0003-4673-757X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6505775/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6505775/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,864,885,2102,2928,23866,27924,27925,53791,53793</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31067283$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Brañas-Garza, Pablo</contributor><creatorcontrib>Batteux, Eleonore</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ferguson, Eamonn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tunney, Richard J</creatorcontrib><title>Do our risk preferences change when we make decisions for others? A meta-analysis of self-other differences in decisions involving risk</title><title>PloS one</title><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><description>Are we more risk-averse or risk-seeking when we make decisions on behalf of other people as opposed to ourselves? So far, findings have not been able to provide a clear and consistent answer.
We propose a meta-analysis to assess whether self-other differences vary according to particular features of the decision. We reviewed 78 effect sizes from 49 studies (7,576 participants).
There was no overall self-other difference, but there were moderating effects of domain and frame. Decisions in the interpersonal domain were more risk-averse for self than for other. Decisions in the medical domain were more risk-seeking for self than for other. There were no overall self-other differences in the financial domain, however there was a moderating effect of frame: decisions in a gain frame were more risk-averse for self than other whereas decisions in a loss frame were more risk-seeking for self than other. This effect of frame was slightly different overall and in the medical domain, where self-other differences occurred in a loss frame but not in a gain frame.
Future work should continue to investigate how the specific content and context of the decision impacts self-other differences in order to understand the effects of domain and frame we report.</description><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>Biology and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Choice Behavior</subject><subject>Confidence intervals</subject><subject>Decision analysis</subject><subject>Decision Making</subject><subject>Decisions</subject><subject>Financial Management</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Internet</subject><subject>Interpersonal Relations</subject><subject>Medical ethics</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine and Health Sciences</subject><subject>Meta-analysis</subject><subject>Meta-Analysis as Topic</subject><subject>Models, Theoretical</subject><subject>Physical Sciences</subject><subject>Research and Analysis Methods</subject><subject>Research methodology</subject><subject>Risk</subject><subject>Risk aversion</subject><subject>Risk perception</subject><subject>Risk taking</subject><subject>Science Policy</subject><subject>Social Sciences</subject><subject>Systematic review</subject><issn>1932-6203</issn><issn>1932-6203</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNqNk9uO0zAQhiMEYpeFN0BgCQnBRYoPsZPcgKrlVGmllTjdWq4zad1N7a6ddNkn4LVx2mzVoL1AvvDpm3_G45kkeU7whLCcvFu5zlvVTDbOwgRTIrgQD5JTUjKaCorZw6P1SfIkhBXGnBVCPE5OGMEipwU7Tf58dCgKIW_CFdp4qMGD1RCQXiq7AHSzBItuAK3VFaAKtAnG2YBq55Frl-DDBzRFa2hVqmIwt8EE5GoUoKnT3T2qTH3QNPZIwtita7bGLna-nyaPatUEeDbMZ8nPz59-nH9NLy6_zM6nF6kWJW1ToJBnQotcQJmpAucck3oed_N6TqsScFELXqqSlFyQQuRVpjnmOQMBhGIM7Cx5udfdNC7IIYdBUkpJkWFW0EjM9kTl1EpuvFkrfyudMnJ34PxCKt8a3YDMVZUBIRkmXGcauOJ9UBVmKqeU6yJqvR-8dfM1VBps61UzEh3fWLOUC7eVoo8651HgzSDg3XUHoZVrEzQ0jbLguj5uRkqMS5pF9NU_6P2vG6iFig8wtnbRr-5F5ZQXWYExy1mkJvdQcVSwNjoWXG3i-cjg7cggMi38bheqC0HOvn_7f_by15h9fcQuQTXtMrima_sSGoPZHtTehRDr-JBkgmXfL3fZkH2_yKFfotmL4w86GN01CPsLEQkQRA</recordid><startdate>20190508</startdate><enddate>20190508</enddate><creator>Batteux, Eleonore</creator><creator>Ferguson, Eamonn</creator><creator>Tunney, Richard J</creator><general>Public Library of Science</general><general>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>IOV</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5494-7385</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4673-757X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20190508</creationdate><title>Do our risk preferences change when we make decisions for others? A meta-analysis of self-other differences in decisions involving risk</title><author>Batteux, Eleonore ; Ferguson, Eamonn ; Tunney, Richard J</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-e2e746c676e94a807501fb76ebfb2d9e08f659a919561867d4c50573e6e1200e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>Biology and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Choice Behavior</topic><topic>Confidence intervals</topic><topic>Decision analysis</topic><topic>Decision Making</topic><topic>Decisions</topic><topic>Financial Management</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Internet</topic><topic>Interpersonal Relations</topic><topic>Medical ethics</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine and Health Sciences</topic><topic>Meta-analysis</topic><topic>Meta-Analysis as Topic</topic><topic>Models, Theoretical</topic><topic>Physical Sciences</topic><topic>Research and Analysis Methods</topic><topic>Research methodology</topic><topic>Risk</topic><topic>Risk aversion</topic><topic>Risk perception</topic><topic>Risk taking</topic><topic>Science Policy</topic><topic>Social Sciences</topic><topic>Systematic review</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Batteux, Eleonore</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ferguson, Eamonn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tunney, Richard J</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Opposing Viewpoints</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Materials Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>Access via ProQuest (Open Access)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Batteux, Eleonore</au><au>Ferguson, Eamonn</au><au>Tunney, Richard J</au><au>Brañas-Garza, Pablo</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Do our risk preferences change when we make decisions for others? A meta-analysis of self-other differences in decisions involving risk</atitle><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><date>2019-05-08</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>14</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>e0216566</spage><epage>e0216566</epage><pages>e0216566-e0216566</pages><issn>1932-6203</issn><eissn>1932-6203</eissn><abstract>Are we more risk-averse or risk-seeking when we make decisions on behalf of other people as opposed to ourselves? So far, findings have not been able to provide a clear and consistent answer.
We propose a meta-analysis to assess whether self-other differences vary according to particular features of the decision. We reviewed 78 effect sizes from 49 studies (7,576 participants).
There was no overall self-other difference, but there were moderating effects of domain and frame. Decisions in the interpersonal domain were more risk-averse for self than for other. Decisions in the medical domain were more risk-seeking for self than for other. There were no overall self-other differences in the financial domain, however there was a moderating effect of frame: decisions in a gain frame were more risk-averse for self than other whereas decisions in a loss frame were more risk-seeking for self than other. This effect of frame was slightly different overall and in the medical domain, where self-other differences occurred in a loss frame but not in a gain frame.
Future work should continue to investigate how the specific content and context of the decision impacts self-other differences in order to understand the effects of domain and frame we report.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Public Library of Science</pub><pmid>31067283</pmid><doi>10.1371/journal.pone.0216566</doi><tpages>e0216566</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5494-7385</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4673-757X</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 1932-6203 |
| ispartof | PloS one, 2019-05, Vol.14 (5), p.e0216566-e0216566 |
| issn | 1932-6203 1932-6203 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_plos_journals_2221840382 |
| source | MEDLINE; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Public Library of Science (PLoS) Journals Open Access; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central; Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry |
| subjects | Analysis Biology and Life Sciences Choice Behavior Confidence intervals Decision analysis Decision Making Decisions Financial Management Humans Internet Interpersonal Relations Medical ethics Medicine Medicine and Health Sciences Meta-analysis Meta-Analysis as Topic Models, Theoretical Physical Sciences Research and Analysis Methods Research methodology Risk Risk aversion Risk perception Risk taking Science Policy Social Sciences Systematic review |
| title | Do our risk preferences change when we make decisions for others? A meta-analysis of self-other differences in decisions involving risk |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-24T03%3A25%3A09IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_plos_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Do%20our%20risk%20preferences%20change%20when%20we%20make%20decisions%20for%20others?%20A%20meta-analysis%20of%20self-other%20differences%20in%20decisions%20involving%20risk&rft.jtitle=PloS%20one&rft.au=Batteux,%20Eleonore&rft.date=2019-05-08&rft.volume=14&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=e0216566&rft.epage=e0216566&rft.pages=e0216566-e0216566&rft.issn=1932-6203&rft.eissn=1932-6203&rft_id=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0216566&rft_dat=%3Cgale_plos_%3EA584800373%3C/gale_plos_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2221840382&rft_id=info:pmid/31067283&rft_galeid=A584800373&rft_doaj_id=oai_doaj_org_article_7ad4e114015c4ce5a594a8d03a7225c8&rfr_iscdi=true |