Assessing the importance of cultural diffusion in the Bantu spread into southeastern Africa
The subsistence of Neolithic populations is based on agriculture, whereas that of previous populations was based on hunting and gathering. Neolithic spreads due to dispersal of populations are called demic, and those due to the incorporation of hunter-gatherers are called cultural. It is well-known...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | PloS one 2019-05, Vol.14 (5), p.e0215573-e0215573 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | e0215573 |
---|---|
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | e0215573 |
container_title | PloS one |
container_volume | 14 |
creator | Isern, Neus Fort, Joaquim |
description | The subsistence of Neolithic populations is based on agriculture, whereas that of previous populations was based on hunting and gathering. Neolithic spreads due to dispersal of populations are called demic, and those due to the incorporation of hunter-gatherers are called cultural. It is well-known that, after agriculture appeared in West Africa, it spread across most of subequatorial Africa. It has been proposed that this spread took place alongside with that of Bantu languages. In eastern and southeastern Africa, it is also linked to the Early Iron Age. From the beginning of the last millennium BC, cereal agriculture spread rapidly from the Great Lakes area eastwards to the East African coast, and southwards to northeastern South Africa. Here we show that the southwards spread took place substantially more rapidly (1.50-2.27 km/y) than the eastwards spread (0.59-1.27 km/y). Such a faster southwards spread could be the result of a stronger cultural effect. To assess this possibility, we compare these observed ranges to those obtained from a demic-cultural wave-of-advance model. We find that both spreads were driven by demic diffusion, in agreement with most archaeological, linguistic and genetic results. Nonetheless, the southwards spread seems to have indeed a stronger cultural component, which could lead support to the hypothesis that, at the southern areas, the interaction with pastoralist people may have played a significant role. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1371/journal.pone.0215573 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_plos_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_plos_journals_2221833275</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A584800375</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_6cc145ca623e480e8396873c87cf7fbb</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A584800375</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c734t-ec41abba8b4b77c4e646d9ec81fc1411f7eaf919ca4c5e2f66f1c60f15167ba13</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNk1uL1DAUx4so7rr6DUQLgujDjLm0SfsijIuXgYUFby8-hDQ9mcnSScZcRL-9mZnuMJV9kFLanvz-_9OcnFMUTzGaY8rxmxuXvJXDfOsszBHBdc3pveIct5TMGEH0_sn7WfEohBuEatow9rA4oxgxTgg6L34sQoAQjF2VcQ2l2Wydj9IqKJ0uVRpi8nIoe6N1CsbZ0tg9907amMqw9SD7HIuuDC7lBRkieFsutDdKPi4eaDkEeDI-L4pvH95_vfw0u7r-uLxcXM0Up1Wcgaqw7DrZdFXHuaqAVaxvQTVYK1xhrDlI3eJWyUrVQDRjGiuGNK4x453E9KJ4fvDdDi6IsS5BEEJwQynhdSaWB6J38kZsvdlI_0c4acQ-4PxKSB-NGkAwlZPWSjJCoWoQNLRlDaeq4Upz3XXZ6-2YLXUb6BXYmEs0MZ2uWLMWK_dLsBoxXJFsgA8GKiQlPCjwSsa98PixuwniRFBOKKmy5tWY1LufCUIUGxMUDIO04NJurxQ3bcsYzeiLf9C7KzJSK5k3bax2-V_VzlQs6iZvHNE9Nb-DylcPG6Ny42mT4xPB64kgMxF-x5VMIYjll8__z15_n7IvT9jcZ0NcBzekmHsyTMFqLK53IXjQx4PBSOzm5rYaYjc3YpybLHt2eqhH0e2g0L9F3hMt</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2221833275</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Assessing the importance of cultural diffusion in the Bantu spread into southeastern Africa</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Recercat</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry</source><source>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</source><creator>Isern, Neus ; Fort, Joaquim</creator><contributor>Baggaley, Andrew</contributor><creatorcontrib>Isern, Neus ; Fort, Joaquim ; Baggaley, Andrew</creatorcontrib><description>The subsistence of Neolithic populations is based on agriculture, whereas that of previous populations was based on hunting and gathering. Neolithic spreads due to dispersal of populations are called demic, and those due to the incorporation of hunter-gatherers are called cultural. It is well-known that, after agriculture appeared in West Africa, it spread across most of subequatorial Africa. It has been proposed that this spread took place alongside with that of Bantu languages. In eastern and southeastern Africa, it is also linked to the Early Iron Age. From the beginning of the last millennium BC, cereal agriculture spread rapidly from the Great Lakes area eastwards to the East African coast, and southwards to northeastern South Africa. Here we show that the southwards spread took place substantially more rapidly (1.50-2.27 km/y) than the eastwards spread (0.59-1.27 km/y). Such a faster southwards spread could be the result of a stronger cultural effect. To assess this possibility, we compare these observed ranges to those obtained from a demic-cultural wave-of-advance model. We find that both spreads were driven by demic diffusion, in agreement with most archaeological, linguistic and genetic results. Nonetheless, the southwards spread seems to have indeed a stronger cultural component, which could lead support to the hypothesis that, at the southern areas, the interaction with pastoralist people may have played a significant role.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0215573</identifier><identifier>PMID: 31067220</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Public Library of Science</publisher><subject>Africa, Eastern ; Africa, Southern ; Agriculture ; Analysis ; Anàlisi ; Archaeology ; Bantu languages ; Bantu speaking peoples ; Bantus ; Cultural diffusion ; Cultural Evolution - history ; Culture diffusion ; Databases, Factual ; Diffusion ; Difusió cultural ; Dispersal ; Edat del ferro ; Farmers ; History, Ancient ; Humans ; Hunting ; Hunting and gathering societies ; Iron ; Iron Age ; Laboratories ; Lakes ; Language - history ; Linear Models ; Mathematical models ; Models matemàtics ; Natural history ; Neolithic ; Neolithic period ; Neolític ; Population ; Populations ; Social aspects ; Stone Age ; Sèries temporals ; Theory ; Time-series analysis</subject><ispartof>PloS one, 2019-05, Vol.14 (5), p.e0215573-e0215573</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2019 Public Library of Science</rights><rights>2019 Isern, Fort. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>Attribution 4.0 International info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess <a href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</a></rights><rights>2019 Isern, Fort 2019 Isern, Fort</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c734t-ec41abba8b4b77c4e646d9ec81fc1411f7eaf919ca4c5e2f66f1c60f15167ba13</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c734t-ec41abba8b4b77c4e646d9ec81fc1411f7eaf919ca4c5e2f66f1c60f15167ba13</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-2647-8558</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6506142/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6506142/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,860,881,2096,2915,23845,26951,27901,27902,53766,53768,79343,79344</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31067220$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Baggaley, Andrew</contributor><creatorcontrib>Isern, Neus</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fort, Joaquim</creatorcontrib><title>Assessing the importance of cultural diffusion in the Bantu spread into southeastern Africa</title><title>PloS one</title><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><description>The subsistence of Neolithic populations is based on agriculture, whereas that of previous populations was based on hunting and gathering. Neolithic spreads due to dispersal of populations are called demic, and those due to the incorporation of hunter-gatherers are called cultural. It is well-known that, after agriculture appeared in West Africa, it spread across most of subequatorial Africa. It has been proposed that this spread took place alongside with that of Bantu languages. In eastern and southeastern Africa, it is also linked to the Early Iron Age. From the beginning of the last millennium BC, cereal agriculture spread rapidly from the Great Lakes area eastwards to the East African coast, and southwards to northeastern South Africa. Here we show that the southwards spread took place substantially more rapidly (1.50-2.27 km/y) than the eastwards spread (0.59-1.27 km/y). Such a faster southwards spread could be the result of a stronger cultural effect. To assess this possibility, we compare these observed ranges to those obtained from a demic-cultural wave-of-advance model. We find that both spreads were driven by demic diffusion, in agreement with most archaeological, linguistic and genetic results. Nonetheless, the southwards spread seems to have indeed a stronger cultural component, which could lead support to the hypothesis that, at the southern areas, the interaction with pastoralist people may have played a significant role.</description><subject>Africa, Eastern</subject><subject>Africa, Southern</subject><subject>Agriculture</subject><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>Anàlisi</subject><subject>Archaeology</subject><subject>Bantu languages</subject><subject>Bantu speaking peoples</subject><subject>Bantus</subject><subject>Cultural diffusion</subject><subject>Cultural Evolution - history</subject><subject>Culture diffusion</subject><subject>Databases, Factual</subject><subject>Diffusion</subject><subject>Difusió cultural</subject><subject>Dispersal</subject><subject>Edat del ferro</subject><subject>Farmers</subject><subject>History, Ancient</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Hunting</subject><subject>Hunting and gathering societies</subject><subject>Iron</subject><subject>Iron Age</subject><subject>Laboratories</subject><subject>Lakes</subject><subject>Language - history</subject><subject>Linear Models</subject><subject>Mathematical models</subject><subject>Models matemàtics</subject><subject>Natural history</subject><subject>Neolithic</subject><subject>Neolithic period</subject><subject>Neolític</subject><subject>Population</subject><subject>Populations</subject><subject>Social aspects</subject><subject>Stone Age</subject><subject>Sèries temporals</subject><subject>Theory</subject><subject>Time-series analysis</subject><issn>1932-6203</issn><issn>1932-6203</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>XX2</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNqNk1uL1DAUx4so7rr6DUQLgujDjLm0SfsijIuXgYUFby8-hDQ9mcnSScZcRL-9mZnuMJV9kFLanvz-_9OcnFMUTzGaY8rxmxuXvJXDfOsszBHBdc3pveIct5TMGEH0_sn7WfEohBuEatow9rA4oxgxTgg6L34sQoAQjF2VcQ2l2Wydj9IqKJ0uVRpi8nIoe6N1CsbZ0tg9907amMqw9SD7HIuuDC7lBRkieFsutDdKPi4eaDkEeDI-L4pvH95_vfw0u7r-uLxcXM0Up1Wcgaqw7DrZdFXHuaqAVaxvQTVYK1xhrDlI3eJWyUrVQDRjGiuGNK4x453E9KJ4fvDdDi6IsS5BEEJwQynhdSaWB6J38kZsvdlI_0c4acQ-4PxKSB-NGkAwlZPWSjJCoWoQNLRlDaeq4Upz3XXZ6-2YLXUb6BXYmEs0MZ2uWLMWK_dLsBoxXJFsgA8GKiQlPCjwSsa98PixuwniRFBOKKmy5tWY1LufCUIUGxMUDIO04NJurxQ3bcsYzeiLf9C7KzJSK5k3bax2-V_VzlQs6iZvHNE9Nb-DylcPG6Ny42mT4xPB64kgMxF-x5VMIYjll8__z15_n7IvT9jcZ0NcBzekmHsyTMFqLK53IXjQx4PBSOzm5rYaYjc3YpybLHt2eqhH0e2g0L9F3hMt</recordid><startdate>20190508</startdate><enddate>20190508</enddate><creator>Isern, Neus</creator><creator>Fort, Joaquim</creator><general>Public Library of Science</general><general>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>IOV</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>XX2</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2647-8558</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20190508</creationdate><title>Assessing the importance of cultural diffusion in the Bantu spread into southeastern Africa</title><author>Isern, Neus ; Fort, Joaquim</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c734t-ec41abba8b4b77c4e646d9ec81fc1411f7eaf919ca4c5e2f66f1c60f15167ba13</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Africa, Eastern</topic><topic>Africa, Southern</topic><topic>Agriculture</topic><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>Anàlisi</topic><topic>Archaeology</topic><topic>Bantu languages</topic><topic>Bantu speaking peoples</topic><topic>Bantus</topic><topic>Cultural diffusion</topic><topic>Cultural Evolution - history</topic><topic>Culture diffusion</topic><topic>Databases, Factual</topic><topic>Diffusion</topic><topic>Difusió cultural</topic><topic>Dispersal</topic><topic>Edat del ferro</topic><topic>Farmers</topic><topic>History, Ancient</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Hunting</topic><topic>Hunting and gathering societies</topic><topic>Iron</topic><topic>Iron Age</topic><topic>Laboratories</topic><topic>Lakes</topic><topic>Language - history</topic><topic>Linear Models</topic><topic>Mathematical models</topic><topic>Models matemàtics</topic><topic>Natural history</topic><topic>Neolithic</topic><topic>Neolithic period</topic><topic>Neolític</topic><topic>Population</topic><topic>Populations</topic><topic>Social aspects</topic><topic>Stone Age</topic><topic>Sèries temporals</topic><topic>Theory</topic><topic>Time-series analysis</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Isern, Neus</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fort, Joaquim</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Opposing Viewpoints</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Materials Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Recercat</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Isern, Neus</au><au>Fort, Joaquim</au><au>Baggaley, Andrew</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Assessing the importance of cultural diffusion in the Bantu spread into southeastern Africa</atitle><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><date>2019-05-08</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>14</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>e0215573</spage><epage>e0215573</epage><pages>e0215573-e0215573</pages><issn>1932-6203</issn><eissn>1932-6203</eissn><abstract>The subsistence of Neolithic populations is based on agriculture, whereas that of previous populations was based on hunting and gathering. Neolithic spreads due to dispersal of populations are called demic, and those due to the incorporation of hunter-gatherers are called cultural. It is well-known that, after agriculture appeared in West Africa, it spread across most of subequatorial Africa. It has been proposed that this spread took place alongside with that of Bantu languages. In eastern and southeastern Africa, it is also linked to the Early Iron Age. From the beginning of the last millennium BC, cereal agriculture spread rapidly from the Great Lakes area eastwards to the East African coast, and southwards to northeastern South Africa. Here we show that the southwards spread took place substantially more rapidly (1.50-2.27 km/y) than the eastwards spread (0.59-1.27 km/y). Such a faster southwards spread could be the result of a stronger cultural effect. To assess this possibility, we compare these observed ranges to those obtained from a demic-cultural wave-of-advance model. We find that both spreads were driven by demic diffusion, in agreement with most archaeological, linguistic and genetic results. Nonetheless, the southwards spread seems to have indeed a stronger cultural component, which could lead support to the hypothesis that, at the southern areas, the interaction with pastoralist people may have played a significant role.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Public Library of Science</pub><pmid>31067220</pmid><doi>10.1371/journal.pone.0215573</doi><tpages>e0215573</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2647-8558</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1932-6203 |
ispartof | PloS one, 2019-05, Vol.14 (5), p.e0215573-e0215573 |
issn | 1932-6203 1932-6203 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_plos_journals_2221833275 |
source | MEDLINE; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Recercat; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; PubMed Central; Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry; Public Library of Science (PLoS) |
subjects | Africa, Eastern Africa, Southern Agriculture Analysis Anàlisi Archaeology Bantu languages Bantu speaking peoples Bantus Cultural diffusion Cultural Evolution - history Culture diffusion Databases, Factual Diffusion Difusió cultural Dispersal Edat del ferro Farmers History, Ancient Humans Hunting Hunting and gathering societies Iron Iron Age Laboratories Lakes Language - history Linear Models Mathematical models Models matemàtics Natural history Neolithic Neolithic period Neolític Population Populations Social aspects Stone Age Sèries temporals Theory Time-series analysis |
title | Assessing the importance of cultural diffusion in the Bantu spread into southeastern Africa |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-28T16%3A03%3A58IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_plos_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Assessing%20the%20importance%20of%20cultural%20diffusion%20in%20the%20Bantu%20spread%20into%20southeastern%20Africa&rft.jtitle=PloS%20one&rft.au=Isern,%20Neus&rft.date=2019-05-08&rft.volume=14&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=e0215573&rft.epage=e0215573&rft.pages=e0215573-e0215573&rft.issn=1932-6203&rft.eissn=1932-6203&rft_id=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0215573&rft_dat=%3Cgale_plos_%3EA584800375%3C/gale_plos_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2221833275&rft_id=info:pmid/31067220&rft_galeid=A584800375&rft_doaj_id=oai_doaj_org_article_6cc145ca623e480e8396873c87cf7fbb&rfr_iscdi=true |