Variability in the validity and reliability of outcome measures identified in a systematic review to assess treatment efficacy of cognitive enhancers for Alzheimer's Dementia

Selection of optimal outcome measures is a critical step in a systematic review; inclusion of uncommon or non-validated outcome measures can impact the uptake of systematic review findings. Our goals were to identify the validity and reliability of outcome measures used in primary studies to assess...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:

Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:	PloS one 2019-04, Vol.14 (4), p.e0215225
Hauptverfasser:	Soobiah, Charlene, Tadrous, Mina, Knowles, Sandra, Blondal, Erik, Ashoor, Huda M, Ghassemi, Marco, Khan, Paul A, Ho, Joanne, Tricco, Andrea C, Straus, Sharon E
Format:	Artikel
Sprache:	eng
Schlagworte:	Activities of daily living Advertising executives Alzheimer Disease - drug therapy Alzheimer Disease - physiopathology Alzheimer's disease Analysis Care and treatment Caregivers Cognition Cognition & reasoning Cognition - drug effects Cognitive ability Cognitive enhancement Dementia Dementia disorders Geriatrics Gerontology Hospitals Humans Knowledge Medical research Memantine Neurology Nootropic agents Nootropic Agents - therapeutic use Pharmacy Psychiatry Quantitative psychology Reliability analysis Reviews Studies Systematic review Treatment Outcome Validity
Online-Zugang:	Volltext
Tags:	Tag hinzufügen Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!

Schreiben Sie den ersten Kommentar!