Advanced diagnostic imaging utilization during emergency department visits in the United States: A predictive modeling study for emergency department triage
Emergency department (ED) crowding is associated with negative health outcomes, patient dissatisfaction, and longer length of stay (LOS). The addition of advanced diagnostic imaging (ADI), namely CT, ultrasound (U/S), and MRI to ED encounter work up is a predictor of longer length of stay. Earlier a...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | PloS one 2019-04, Vol.14 (4), p.e0214905-e0214905 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | e0214905 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | e0214905 |
container_title | PloS one |
container_volume | 14 |
creator | Zhang, Xingyu Kim, Joyce Patzer, Rachel E Pitts, Stephen R Chokshi, Falgun H Schrager, Justin D |
description | Emergency department (ED) crowding is associated with negative health outcomes, patient dissatisfaction, and longer length of stay (LOS). The addition of advanced diagnostic imaging (ADI), namely CT, ultrasound (U/S), and MRI to ED encounter work up is a predictor of longer length of stay. Earlier and improved prediction of patients' need for advanced imaging may improve overall ED efficiency. The aim of the study was to detect the association between ADI utilization and the structured and unstructured information immediately available during ED triage, and to develop and validate models to predict utilization of ADI during an ED encounter.
We used the United States National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey data from 2009 to 2014 to examine which sociodemographic and clinical factors immediately available at ED triage were associated with the utilization of CT, U/S, MRI, and multiple ADI during a patient's ED stay. We used natural language processing (NLP) topic modeling to incorporate free-text reason for visit data available at time of ED triage in addition to other structured patient data to predict the use of ADI using multivariable logistic regression models.
Among the 139,150 adult ED visits from a national probability sample of hospitals across the U.S, 21.9% resulted in ADI use, including 16.8% who had a CT, 3.6% who had an ultrasound, 0.4% who had an MRI, and 1.2% of the population who had multiple types of ADI. The c-statistic of the predictive models was greater than or equal to 0.78 for all imaging outcomes, and the addition of text-based reason for visit information improved the accuracy of all predictive models.
Patient information immediately available during ED triage can accurately predict the eventual use of advanced diagnostic imaging during an ED visit. Such models have the potential to be incorporated into the ED triage workflow in order to more rapidly identify patients who may require advanced imaging during their ED stay and assist with medical decision-making. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1371/journal.pone.0214905 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_plos_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_plos_journals_2208027288</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A581813794</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_53162144261941de856645d6f78e08ab</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A581813794</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-4b8751a3a5870f19f722bac069391bf56be58d8ddd3e1912abe56f66fdee784b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNk91u0zAUxyMEYmPwBggsISG4aLGdxHG4QKomPipNmsQYt5Ybn6SeEruznYryLDwszppNDeoFykXik9_5nw-fkyQvCZ6TtCAfbmzvjGznG2tgjinJSpw_Sk5JmdIZozh9fPB9kjzz_gbjPOWMPU1OUlyyjJflafJnobbSVKCQ0rIx1gddId3JRpsG9UG3-rcM2hqkejeYoAPXgKl2SMFGutCBCWirvQ4eaYPCGtC10SHqXQUZwH9EC7RxoHQV9BZQZxW0g44Pvdqh2rrjisHFbOB58qSWrYcX4_ssuf7y-cf5t9nF5dfl-eJiVrGShlm24kVOZCpzXuCalHVB6UpWmJVpSVZ1zlaQc8WVUimQklAZz6xmrFYABc9W6Vnyeq-7aa0XY2O9oBRzTAvKeSSWe0JZeSM2LnbI7YSVWtwZrGtETF1XLYg8JSzeRkYZKTOigOeMZblidcEBczlE-zRG61cdqCrW62Q7EZ3-MXotGrsVUSZq5lHg3Sjg7G0PPohO-wraVhqw_V3eRcyBcRrRN_-gx6sbqUbGArSpbYxbDaJikXPC47yVWaTmR6j4KOh0Faew1tE-cXg_cYhMgF-hkb33Ynn1_f_Zy59T9u0BuwbZhrW3bT_MqZ-C2R6snPXeQf3QZILFsET33RDDEolxiaLbq8MLenC635r0L-MJGjc</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2208027288</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Advanced diagnostic imaging utilization during emergency department visits in the United States: A predictive modeling study for emergency department triage</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Public Library of Science (PLoS) Journals Open Access</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry</source><creator>Zhang, Xingyu ; Kim, Joyce ; Patzer, Rachel E ; Pitts, Stephen R ; Chokshi, Falgun H ; Schrager, Justin D</creator><contributor>Li, Dongmei</contributor><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Xingyu ; Kim, Joyce ; Patzer, Rachel E ; Pitts, Stephen R ; Chokshi, Falgun H ; Schrager, Justin D ; Li, Dongmei</creatorcontrib><description>Emergency department (ED) crowding is associated with negative health outcomes, patient dissatisfaction, and longer length of stay (LOS). The addition of advanced diagnostic imaging (ADI), namely CT, ultrasound (U/S), and MRI to ED encounter work up is a predictor of longer length of stay. Earlier and improved prediction of patients' need for advanced imaging may improve overall ED efficiency. The aim of the study was to detect the association between ADI utilization and the structured and unstructured information immediately available during ED triage, and to develop and validate models to predict utilization of ADI during an ED encounter.
We used the United States National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey data from 2009 to 2014 to examine which sociodemographic and clinical factors immediately available at ED triage were associated with the utilization of CT, U/S, MRI, and multiple ADI during a patient's ED stay. We used natural language processing (NLP) topic modeling to incorporate free-text reason for visit data available at time of ED triage in addition to other structured patient data to predict the use of ADI using multivariable logistic regression models.
Among the 139,150 adult ED visits from a national probability sample of hospitals across the U.S, 21.9% resulted in ADI use, including 16.8% who had a CT, 3.6% who had an ultrasound, 0.4% who had an MRI, and 1.2% of the population who had multiple types of ADI. The c-statistic of the predictive models was greater than or equal to 0.78 for all imaging outcomes, and the addition of text-based reason for visit information improved the accuracy of all predictive models.
Patient information immediately available during ED triage can accurately predict the eventual use of advanced diagnostic imaging during an ED visit. Such models have the potential to be incorporated into the ED triage workflow in order to more rapidly identify patients who may require advanced imaging during their ED stay and assist with medical decision-making.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0214905</identifier><identifier>PMID: 30964899</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Public Library of Science</publisher><subject><![CDATA[Adolescent ; Adult ; Aged ; Ambulatory care ; Analysis ; Artificial intelligence ; Biology and Life Sciences ; CAT scans ; Clinical decision making ; Computed tomography ; Crowding ; Decision making ; Dementia ; Diagnostic imaging ; Diagnostic Imaging - statistics & numerical data ; Diagnostic systems ; Emergencies ; Emergency medical care ; Emergency medical services ; Emergency Service, Hospital - statistics & numerical data ; Emergency services ; Epidemiology ; Ethnicity ; Female ; Health ; Health Care Surveys - statistics & numerical data ; Health services ; Health surveys ; Hospital costs ; Hospital emergency services ; Hospitalization - statistics & numerical data ; Humans ; Informatics ; Laboratories ; Length of Stay - statistics & numerical data ; Logistic Models ; Magnetic resonance imaging ; Male ; Medical care utilization ; Medical diagnosis ; Medical imaging ; Medical research ; Medicine ; Medicine and Health Sciences ; Middle Aged ; Model accuracy ; Modelling ; Natural Language Processing ; NMR ; Nuclear magnetic resonance ; Pain ; Patient satisfaction ; Patients ; Pediatrics ; Physical Sciences ; Prediction models ; Public health ; Regression analysis ; Regression models ; Research and Analysis Methods ; Statistical analysis ; Studies ; Tomography ; Triage - statistics & numerical data ; Ultrasonic imaging ; Ultrasound ; United States ; Unstructured data ; Utilization ; Variables ; Workflow ; Workflow software ; Young Adult]]></subject><ispartof>PloS one, 2019-04, Vol.14 (4), p.e0214905-e0214905</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2019 Public Library of Science</rights><rights>2019 Zhang et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>2019 Zhang et al 2019 Zhang et al</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-4b8751a3a5870f19f722bac069391bf56be58d8ddd3e1912abe56f66fdee784b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-4b8751a3a5870f19f722bac069391bf56be58d8ddd3e1912abe56f66fdee784b3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-2291-8640</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6456195/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6456195/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,864,885,2102,2928,23866,27924,27925,53791,53793,79600,79601</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30964899$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Li, Dongmei</contributor><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Xingyu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Joyce</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Patzer, Rachel E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pitts, Stephen R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chokshi, Falgun H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schrager, Justin D</creatorcontrib><title>Advanced diagnostic imaging utilization during emergency department visits in the United States: A predictive modeling study for emergency department triage</title><title>PloS one</title><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><description>Emergency department (ED) crowding is associated with negative health outcomes, patient dissatisfaction, and longer length of stay (LOS). The addition of advanced diagnostic imaging (ADI), namely CT, ultrasound (U/S), and MRI to ED encounter work up is a predictor of longer length of stay. Earlier and improved prediction of patients' need for advanced imaging may improve overall ED efficiency. The aim of the study was to detect the association between ADI utilization and the structured and unstructured information immediately available during ED triage, and to develop and validate models to predict utilization of ADI during an ED encounter.
We used the United States National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey data from 2009 to 2014 to examine which sociodemographic and clinical factors immediately available at ED triage were associated with the utilization of CT, U/S, MRI, and multiple ADI during a patient's ED stay. We used natural language processing (NLP) topic modeling to incorporate free-text reason for visit data available at time of ED triage in addition to other structured patient data to predict the use of ADI using multivariable logistic regression models.
Among the 139,150 adult ED visits from a national probability sample of hospitals across the U.S, 21.9% resulted in ADI use, including 16.8% who had a CT, 3.6% who had an ultrasound, 0.4% who had an MRI, and 1.2% of the population who had multiple types of ADI. The c-statistic of the predictive models was greater than or equal to 0.78 for all imaging outcomes, and the addition of text-based reason for visit information improved the accuracy of all predictive models.
Patient information immediately available during ED triage can accurately predict the eventual use of advanced diagnostic imaging during an ED visit. Such models have the potential to be incorporated into the ED triage workflow in order to more rapidly identify patients who may require advanced imaging during their ED stay and assist with medical decision-making.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Ambulatory care</subject><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>Artificial intelligence</subject><subject>Biology and Life Sciences</subject><subject>CAT scans</subject><subject>Clinical decision making</subject><subject>Computed tomography</subject><subject>Crowding</subject><subject>Decision making</subject><subject>Dementia</subject><subject>Diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Diagnostic Imaging - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Diagnostic systems</subject><subject>Emergencies</subject><subject>Emergency medical care</subject><subject>Emergency medical services</subject><subject>Emergency Service, Hospital - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Emergency services</subject><subject>Epidemiology</subject><subject>Ethnicity</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Health</subject><subject>Health Care Surveys - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Health services</subject><subject>Health surveys</subject><subject>Hospital costs</subject><subject>Hospital emergency services</subject><subject>Hospitalization - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Informatics</subject><subject>Laboratories</subject><subject>Length of Stay - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Logistic Models</subject><subject>Magnetic resonance imaging</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical care utilization</subject><subject>Medical diagnosis</subject><subject>Medical imaging</subject><subject>Medical research</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine and Health Sciences</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Model accuracy</subject><subject>Modelling</subject><subject>Natural Language Processing</subject><subject>NMR</subject><subject>Nuclear magnetic resonance</subject><subject>Pain</subject><subject>Patient satisfaction</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Pediatrics</subject><subject>Physical Sciences</subject><subject>Prediction models</subject><subject>Public health</subject><subject>Regression analysis</subject><subject>Regression models</subject><subject>Research and Analysis Methods</subject><subject>Statistical analysis</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Tomography</subject><subject>Triage - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Ultrasonic imaging</subject><subject>Ultrasound</subject><subject>United States</subject><subject>Unstructured data</subject><subject>Utilization</subject><subject>Variables</subject><subject>Workflow</subject><subject>Workflow software</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>1932-6203</issn><issn>1932-6203</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNqNk91u0zAUxyMEYmPwBggsISG4aLGdxHG4QKomPipNmsQYt5Ybn6SeEruznYryLDwszppNDeoFykXik9_5nw-fkyQvCZ6TtCAfbmzvjGznG2tgjinJSpw_Sk5JmdIZozh9fPB9kjzz_gbjPOWMPU1OUlyyjJflafJnobbSVKCQ0rIx1gddId3JRpsG9UG3-rcM2hqkejeYoAPXgKl2SMFGutCBCWirvQ4eaYPCGtC10SHqXQUZwH9EC7RxoHQV9BZQZxW0g44Pvdqh2rrjisHFbOB58qSWrYcX4_ssuf7y-cf5t9nF5dfl-eJiVrGShlm24kVOZCpzXuCalHVB6UpWmJVpSVZ1zlaQc8WVUimQklAZz6xmrFYABc9W6Vnyeq-7aa0XY2O9oBRzTAvKeSSWe0JZeSM2LnbI7YSVWtwZrGtETF1XLYg8JSzeRkYZKTOigOeMZblidcEBczlE-zRG61cdqCrW62Q7EZ3-MXotGrsVUSZq5lHg3Sjg7G0PPohO-wraVhqw_V3eRcyBcRrRN_-gx6sbqUbGArSpbYxbDaJikXPC47yVWaTmR6j4KOh0Faew1tE-cXg_cYhMgF-hkb33Ynn1_f_Zy59T9u0BuwbZhrW3bT_MqZ-C2R6snPXeQf3QZILFsET33RDDEolxiaLbq8MLenC635r0L-MJGjc</recordid><startdate>20190409</startdate><enddate>20190409</enddate><creator>Zhang, Xingyu</creator><creator>Kim, Joyce</creator><creator>Patzer, Rachel E</creator><creator>Pitts, Stephen R</creator><creator>Chokshi, Falgun H</creator><creator>Schrager, Justin D</creator><general>Public Library of Science</general><general>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>IOV</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2291-8640</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20190409</creationdate><title>Advanced diagnostic imaging utilization during emergency department visits in the United States: A predictive modeling study for emergency department triage</title><author>Zhang, Xingyu ; Kim, Joyce ; Patzer, Rachel E ; Pitts, Stephen R ; Chokshi, Falgun H ; Schrager, Justin D</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-4b8751a3a5870f19f722bac069391bf56be58d8ddd3e1912abe56f66fdee784b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Ambulatory care</topic><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>Artificial intelligence</topic><topic>Biology and Life Sciences</topic><topic>CAT scans</topic><topic>Clinical decision making</topic><topic>Computed tomography</topic><topic>Crowding</topic><topic>Decision making</topic><topic>Dementia</topic><topic>Diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Diagnostic Imaging - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Diagnostic systems</topic><topic>Emergencies</topic><topic>Emergency medical care</topic><topic>Emergency medical services</topic><topic>Emergency Service, Hospital - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Emergency services</topic><topic>Epidemiology</topic><topic>Ethnicity</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Health</topic><topic>Health Care Surveys - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Health services</topic><topic>Health surveys</topic><topic>Hospital costs</topic><topic>Hospital emergency services</topic><topic>Hospitalization - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Informatics</topic><topic>Laboratories</topic><topic>Length of Stay - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Logistic Models</topic><topic>Magnetic resonance imaging</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical care utilization</topic><topic>Medical diagnosis</topic><topic>Medical imaging</topic><topic>Medical research</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine and Health Sciences</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Model accuracy</topic><topic>Modelling</topic><topic>Natural Language Processing</topic><topic>NMR</topic><topic>Nuclear magnetic resonance</topic><topic>Pain</topic><topic>Patient satisfaction</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Pediatrics</topic><topic>Physical Sciences</topic><topic>Prediction models</topic><topic>Public health</topic><topic>Regression analysis</topic><topic>Regression models</topic><topic>Research and Analysis Methods</topic><topic>Statistical analysis</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Tomography</topic><topic>Triage - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Ultrasonic imaging</topic><topic>Ultrasound</topic><topic>United States</topic><topic>Unstructured data</topic><topic>Utilization</topic><topic>Variables</topic><topic>Workflow</topic><topic>Workflow software</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Xingyu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Joyce</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Patzer, Rachel E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pitts, Stephen R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chokshi, Falgun H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schrager, Justin D</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Opposing Viewpoints</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Materials Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Zhang, Xingyu</au><au>Kim, Joyce</au><au>Patzer, Rachel E</au><au>Pitts, Stephen R</au><au>Chokshi, Falgun H</au><au>Schrager, Justin D</au><au>Li, Dongmei</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Advanced diagnostic imaging utilization during emergency department visits in the United States: A predictive modeling study for emergency department triage</atitle><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><date>2019-04-09</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>14</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>e0214905</spage><epage>e0214905</epage><pages>e0214905-e0214905</pages><issn>1932-6203</issn><eissn>1932-6203</eissn><abstract>Emergency department (ED) crowding is associated with negative health outcomes, patient dissatisfaction, and longer length of stay (LOS). The addition of advanced diagnostic imaging (ADI), namely CT, ultrasound (U/S), and MRI to ED encounter work up is a predictor of longer length of stay. Earlier and improved prediction of patients' need for advanced imaging may improve overall ED efficiency. The aim of the study was to detect the association between ADI utilization and the structured and unstructured information immediately available during ED triage, and to develop and validate models to predict utilization of ADI during an ED encounter.
We used the United States National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey data from 2009 to 2014 to examine which sociodemographic and clinical factors immediately available at ED triage were associated with the utilization of CT, U/S, MRI, and multiple ADI during a patient's ED stay. We used natural language processing (NLP) topic modeling to incorporate free-text reason for visit data available at time of ED triage in addition to other structured patient data to predict the use of ADI using multivariable logistic regression models.
Among the 139,150 adult ED visits from a national probability sample of hospitals across the U.S, 21.9% resulted in ADI use, including 16.8% who had a CT, 3.6% who had an ultrasound, 0.4% who had an MRI, and 1.2% of the population who had multiple types of ADI. The c-statistic of the predictive models was greater than or equal to 0.78 for all imaging outcomes, and the addition of text-based reason for visit information improved the accuracy of all predictive models.
Patient information immediately available during ED triage can accurately predict the eventual use of advanced diagnostic imaging during an ED visit. Such models have the potential to be incorporated into the ED triage workflow in order to more rapidly identify patients who may require advanced imaging during their ED stay and assist with medical decision-making.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Public Library of Science</pub><pmid>30964899</pmid><doi>10.1371/journal.pone.0214905</doi><tpages>e0214905</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2291-8640</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1932-6203 |
ispartof | PloS one, 2019-04, Vol.14 (4), p.e0214905-e0214905 |
issn | 1932-6203 1932-6203 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_plos_journals_2208027288 |
source | MEDLINE; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Public Library of Science (PLoS) Journals Open Access; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central; Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry |
subjects | Adolescent Adult Aged Ambulatory care Analysis Artificial intelligence Biology and Life Sciences CAT scans Clinical decision making Computed tomography Crowding Decision making Dementia Diagnostic imaging Diagnostic Imaging - statistics & numerical data Diagnostic systems Emergencies Emergency medical care Emergency medical services Emergency Service, Hospital - statistics & numerical data Emergency services Epidemiology Ethnicity Female Health Health Care Surveys - statistics & numerical data Health services Health surveys Hospital costs Hospital emergency services Hospitalization - statistics & numerical data Humans Informatics Laboratories Length of Stay - statistics & numerical data Logistic Models Magnetic resonance imaging Male Medical care utilization Medical diagnosis Medical imaging Medical research Medicine Medicine and Health Sciences Middle Aged Model accuracy Modelling Natural Language Processing NMR Nuclear magnetic resonance Pain Patient satisfaction Patients Pediatrics Physical Sciences Prediction models Public health Regression analysis Regression models Research and Analysis Methods Statistical analysis Studies Tomography Triage - statistics & numerical data Ultrasonic imaging Ultrasound United States Unstructured data Utilization Variables Workflow Workflow software Young Adult |
title | Advanced diagnostic imaging utilization during emergency department visits in the United States: A predictive modeling study for emergency department triage |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-27T09%3A22%3A38IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_plos_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Advanced%20diagnostic%20imaging%20utilization%20during%20emergency%20department%20visits%20in%20the%20United%20States:%20A%20predictive%20modeling%20study%20for%20emergency%20department%20triage&rft.jtitle=PloS%20one&rft.au=Zhang,%20Xingyu&rft.date=2019-04-09&rft.volume=14&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=e0214905&rft.epage=e0214905&rft.pages=e0214905-e0214905&rft.issn=1932-6203&rft.eissn=1932-6203&rft_id=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0214905&rft_dat=%3Cgale_plos_%3EA581813794%3C/gale_plos_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2208027288&rft_id=info:pmid/30964899&rft_galeid=A581813794&rft_doaj_id=oai_doaj_org_article_53162144261941de856645d6f78e08ab&rfr_iscdi=true |