A small native predator reduces reproductive success of a large invasive fish as revealed by whole-lake experiments

The extent to which native fish communities might control the success of invasive fish has been of interest to ecologists, but it has been rarely addressed using experiments. We conducted an experiment in six small lakes in the Upper Mississippi Region to test the effects of a small native predator,...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:PloS one 2019-04, Vol.14 (4), p.e0214009-e0214009
Hauptverfasser: Poole, Joshua R, Bajer, Przemyslaw G
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page e0214009
container_issue 4
container_start_page e0214009
container_title PloS one
container_volume 14
creator Poole, Joshua R
Bajer, Przemyslaw G
description The extent to which native fish communities might control the success of invasive fish has been of interest to ecologists, but it has been rarely addressed using experiments. We conducted an experiment in six small lakes in the Upper Mississippi Region to test the effects of a small native predator, bluegill sunfish (Lepomis macrochirus) on the recruitment of a large, invasive fish, the common carp (Cyprinus carpio). Bluegills are predominant throughout the region and were previously shown to consume carp eggs and larvae. We stocked both lakes at each of our 3 sites with adult carp (spawners) and one lake at each site with bluegills. We repeated the experiment at two of the three sites for two consecutive years. In each lake we assessed the abundance of post-larval carp one month after spawning (backpack electrofishing surveys) and at the end of the season (mark-recapture). For each site/year combination, catch rate of post-larval carp was typically an order of magnitude higher in control than bluegill lakes, but it often declined quickly over time. The abundance of end-of-seasonal juveniles was significantly higher (no 95% CI overlap) in control lakes than in bluegill lakes, except for one pair of lakes during one year when both the control and bluegill lake had similar, low abundance of end-of-season carp. Overall, our results support the hypothesis that common carp recruitment is substantially reduced in habitats dominated by bluegills. We also suggest our results may be applicable to other species, and that managers should explore how predation on early life stages may control other invasive species.
doi_str_mv 10.1371/journal.pone.0214009
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_plos_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_plos_journals_2203274311</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A581128107</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_708ff71d0c654978985d0b05c0d1aed0</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A581128107</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-e0ca594f9d99b562b374315183e2615ec7da13b482ea7fbc5bfad575c5220e83</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNk0tr3DAQx01padK036C0gkJpD97qYflxKSyhj4VAoA29Clka72qrtRzJ3ibfvnLWCeuSQ9FhxMxv_jN6TJK8JnhBWEE-bd3gW2kXnWthgSnJMK6eJKekYjTNKWZPj_YnyYsQthhzVub58-SE4SpjlNLTJCxR2ElrUSt7swfUedCydx5FOygI0Xbexe1dNAwq-gJyDZLISr8GZNq9DGOsMWGD5JiwB2lBo_oW_dk4C6mVvwHBTQfe7KDtw8vkWSNtgFeTPUuuvn65Ov-eXlx-W50vL1KVV7RPASvJq6ypdFXVPKc1KzJGOCkZ0JxwUIWWhNVZSUEWTa143UjNC644pRhKdpa8Pch21gUxXVcQMcjoqEQisToQ2smt6GJ70t8KJ424czi_FtL3RlkQBS6bpiAaq5xnVVFWJde4xlxhTSRoHLU-T9WGegdaxYN6aWei80hrNmLt9iLPsoLkY7sfJgHvrgcIvdiZoMBa2YIbDn0TVuVsrPXuH_Tx003UOj6HMG3jYl01ioolLwmhJcFFpBaPUHFp2BkV_1Zjon-W8HGWEJkebvq1HEIQq58__p-9_DVn3x-xm_iH-k1wduiNa8MczA6g8i4ED83DJRMsxtG4vw0xjoaYRiOmvTl-oIek-1lgfwF_mQl8</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2203274311</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A small native predator reduces reproductive success of a large invasive fish as revealed by whole-lake experiments</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry</source><creator>Poole, Joshua R ; Bajer, Przemyslaw G</creator><contributor>Eklöv, Peter</contributor><creatorcontrib>Poole, Joshua R ; Bajer, Przemyslaw G ; Eklöv, Peter</creatorcontrib><description>The extent to which native fish communities might control the success of invasive fish has been of interest to ecologists, but it has been rarely addressed using experiments. We conducted an experiment in six small lakes in the Upper Mississippi Region to test the effects of a small native predator, bluegill sunfish (Lepomis macrochirus) on the recruitment of a large, invasive fish, the common carp (Cyprinus carpio). Bluegills are predominant throughout the region and were previously shown to consume carp eggs and larvae. We stocked both lakes at each of our 3 sites with adult carp (spawners) and one lake at each site with bluegills. We repeated the experiment at two of the three sites for two consecutive years. In each lake we assessed the abundance of post-larval carp one month after spawning (backpack electrofishing surveys) and at the end of the season (mark-recapture). For each site/year combination, catch rate of post-larval carp was typically an order of magnitude higher in control than bluegill lakes, but it often declined quickly over time. The abundance of end-of-seasonal juveniles was significantly higher (no 95% CI overlap) in control lakes than in bluegill lakes, except for one pair of lakes during one year when both the control and bluegill lake had similar, low abundance of end-of-season carp. Overall, our results support the hypothesis that common carp recruitment is substantially reduced in habitats dominated by bluegills. We also suggest our results may be applicable to other species, and that managers should explore how predation on early life stages may control other invasive species.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0214009</identifier><identifier>PMID: 30943222</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Public Library of Science</publisher><subject>Abundance ; Animals ; Aquatic ecology ; Biology and Life Sciences ; Breeding success ; Carp ; Carps ; Carps - physiology ; Cyprinus carpio ; Earth Sciences ; Ecologists ; Ecology ; Ecology and Environmental Sciences ; Eggs ; Experiments ; Fish ; Fish eggs ; Fisheries ; Fishes ; Fishing ; Hypotheses ; Hypoxia ; Introduced Species ; Invasive fish ; Invasive species ; Lakes ; Larvae ; Lepomis macrochirus ; Mississippi ; Natural experiments ; Nonnative species ; Perciformes - physiology ; Physical Sciences ; Population ; Predation ; Predation (Biology) ; Predatory Behavior - physiology ; Recruitment ; Reproduction ; Reproduction - physiology ; Spawning ; Success</subject><ispartof>PloS one, 2019-04, Vol.14 (4), p.e0214009-e0214009</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2019 Public Library of Science</rights><rights>2019 Poole, Bajer. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>2019 Poole, Bajer 2019 Poole, Bajer</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-e0ca594f9d99b562b374315183e2615ec7da13b482ea7fbc5bfad575c5220e83</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-e0ca594f9d99b562b374315183e2615ec7da13b482ea7fbc5bfad575c5220e83</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-3981-6088</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6447168/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6447168/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,724,777,781,861,882,2096,2915,23847,27905,27906,53772,53774,79349,79350</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30943222$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Eklöv, Peter</contributor><creatorcontrib>Poole, Joshua R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bajer, Przemyslaw G</creatorcontrib><title>A small native predator reduces reproductive success of a large invasive fish as revealed by whole-lake experiments</title><title>PloS one</title><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><description>The extent to which native fish communities might control the success of invasive fish has been of interest to ecologists, but it has been rarely addressed using experiments. We conducted an experiment in six small lakes in the Upper Mississippi Region to test the effects of a small native predator, bluegill sunfish (Lepomis macrochirus) on the recruitment of a large, invasive fish, the common carp (Cyprinus carpio). Bluegills are predominant throughout the region and were previously shown to consume carp eggs and larvae. We stocked both lakes at each of our 3 sites with adult carp (spawners) and one lake at each site with bluegills. We repeated the experiment at two of the three sites for two consecutive years. In each lake we assessed the abundance of post-larval carp one month after spawning (backpack electrofishing surveys) and at the end of the season (mark-recapture). For each site/year combination, catch rate of post-larval carp was typically an order of magnitude higher in control than bluegill lakes, but it often declined quickly over time. The abundance of end-of-seasonal juveniles was significantly higher (no 95% CI overlap) in control lakes than in bluegill lakes, except for one pair of lakes during one year when both the control and bluegill lake had similar, low abundance of end-of-season carp. Overall, our results support the hypothesis that common carp recruitment is substantially reduced in habitats dominated by bluegills. We also suggest our results may be applicable to other species, and that managers should explore how predation on early life stages may control other invasive species.</description><subject>Abundance</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Aquatic ecology</subject><subject>Biology and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Breeding success</subject><subject>Carp</subject><subject>Carps</subject><subject>Carps - physiology</subject><subject>Cyprinus carpio</subject><subject>Earth Sciences</subject><subject>Ecologists</subject><subject>Ecology</subject><subject>Ecology and Environmental Sciences</subject><subject>Eggs</subject><subject>Experiments</subject><subject>Fish</subject><subject>Fish eggs</subject><subject>Fisheries</subject><subject>Fishes</subject><subject>Fishing</subject><subject>Hypotheses</subject><subject>Hypoxia</subject><subject>Introduced Species</subject><subject>Invasive fish</subject><subject>Invasive species</subject><subject>Lakes</subject><subject>Larvae</subject><subject>Lepomis macrochirus</subject><subject>Mississippi</subject><subject>Natural experiments</subject><subject>Nonnative species</subject><subject>Perciformes - physiology</subject><subject>Physical Sciences</subject><subject>Population</subject><subject>Predation</subject><subject>Predation (Biology)</subject><subject>Predatory Behavior - physiology</subject><subject>Recruitment</subject><subject>Reproduction</subject><subject>Reproduction - physiology</subject><subject>Spawning</subject><subject>Success</subject><issn>1932-6203</issn><issn>1932-6203</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNqNk0tr3DAQx01padK036C0gkJpD97qYflxKSyhj4VAoA29Clka72qrtRzJ3ibfvnLWCeuSQ9FhxMxv_jN6TJK8JnhBWEE-bd3gW2kXnWthgSnJMK6eJKekYjTNKWZPj_YnyYsQthhzVub58-SE4SpjlNLTJCxR2ElrUSt7swfUedCydx5FOygI0Xbexe1dNAwq-gJyDZLISr8GZNq9DGOsMWGD5JiwB2lBo_oW_dk4C6mVvwHBTQfe7KDtw8vkWSNtgFeTPUuuvn65Ov-eXlx-W50vL1KVV7RPASvJq6ypdFXVPKc1KzJGOCkZ0JxwUIWWhNVZSUEWTa143UjNC644pRhKdpa8Pch21gUxXVcQMcjoqEQisToQ2smt6GJ70t8KJ424czi_FtL3RlkQBS6bpiAaq5xnVVFWJde4xlxhTSRoHLU-T9WGegdaxYN6aWei80hrNmLt9iLPsoLkY7sfJgHvrgcIvdiZoMBa2YIbDn0TVuVsrPXuH_Tx003UOj6HMG3jYl01ioolLwmhJcFFpBaPUHFp2BkV_1Zjon-W8HGWEJkebvq1HEIQq58__p-9_DVn3x-xm_iH-k1wduiNa8MczA6g8i4ED83DJRMsxtG4vw0xjoaYRiOmvTl-oIek-1lgfwF_mQl8</recordid><startdate>20190403</startdate><enddate>20190403</enddate><creator>Poole, Joshua R</creator><creator>Bajer, Przemyslaw G</creator><general>Public Library of Science</general><general>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>IOV</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3981-6088</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20190403</creationdate><title>A small native predator reduces reproductive success of a large invasive fish as revealed by whole-lake experiments</title><author>Poole, Joshua R ; Bajer, Przemyslaw G</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-e0ca594f9d99b562b374315183e2615ec7da13b482ea7fbc5bfad575c5220e83</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Abundance</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Aquatic ecology</topic><topic>Biology and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Breeding success</topic><topic>Carp</topic><topic>Carps</topic><topic>Carps - physiology</topic><topic>Cyprinus carpio</topic><topic>Earth Sciences</topic><topic>Ecologists</topic><topic>Ecology</topic><topic>Ecology and Environmental Sciences</topic><topic>Eggs</topic><topic>Experiments</topic><topic>Fish</topic><topic>Fish eggs</topic><topic>Fisheries</topic><topic>Fishes</topic><topic>Fishing</topic><topic>Hypotheses</topic><topic>Hypoxia</topic><topic>Introduced Species</topic><topic>Invasive fish</topic><topic>Invasive species</topic><topic>Lakes</topic><topic>Larvae</topic><topic>Lepomis macrochirus</topic><topic>Mississippi</topic><topic>Natural experiments</topic><topic>Nonnative species</topic><topic>Perciformes - physiology</topic><topic>Physical Sciences</topic><topic>Population</topic><topic>Predation</topic><topic>Predation (Biology)</topic><topic>Predatory Behavior - physiology</topic><topic>Recruitment</topic><topic>Reproduction</topic><topic>Reproduction - physiology</topic><topic>Spawning</topic><topic>Success</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Poole, Joshua R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bajer, Przemyslaw G</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Opposing Viewpoints</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Materials Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Poole, Joshua R</au><au>Bajer, Przemyslaw G</au><au>Eklöv, Peter</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A small native predator reduces reproductive success of a large invasive fish as revealed by whole-lake experiments</atitle><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><date>2019-04-03</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>14</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>e0214009</spage><epage>e0214009</epage><pages>e0214009-e0214009</pages><issn>1932-6203</issn><eissn>1932-6203</eissn><abstract>The extent to which native fish communities might control the success of invasive fish has been of interest to ecologists, but it has been rarely addressed using experiments. We conducted an experiment in six small lakes in the Upper Mississippi Region to test the effects of a small native predator, bluegill sunfish (Lepomis macrochirus) on the recruitment of a large, invasive fish, the common carp (Cyprinus carpio). Bluegills are predominant throughout the region and were previously shown to consume carp eggs and larvae. We stocked both lakes at each of our 3 sites with adult carp (spawners) and one lake at each site with bluegills. We repeated the experiment at two of the three sites for two consecutive years. In each lake we assessed the abundance of post-larval carp one month after spawning (backpack electrofishing surveys) and at the end of the season (mark-recapture). For each site/year combination, catch rate of post-larval carp was typically an order of magnitude higher in control than bluegill lakes, but it often declined quickly over time. The abundance of end-of-seasonal juveniles was significantly higher (no 95% CI overlap) in control lakes than in bluegill lakes, except for one pair of lakes during one year when both the control and bluegill lake had similar, low abundance of end-of-season carp. Overall, our results support the hypothesis that common carp recruitment is substantially reduced in habitats dominated by bluegills. We also suggest our results may be applicable to other species, and that managers should explore how predation on early life stages may control other invasive species.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Public Library of Science</pub><pmid>30943222</pmid><doi>10.1371/journal.pone.0214009</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3981-6088</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1932-6203
ispartof PloS one, 2019-04, Vol.14 (4), p.e0214009-e0214009
issn 1932-6203
1932-6203
language eng
recordid cdi_plos_journals_2203274311
source MEDLINE; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Public Library of Science (PLoS); PubMed Central; Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry
subjects Abundance
Animals
Aquatic ecology
Biology and Life Sciences
Breeding success
Carp
Carps
Carps - physiology
Cyprinus carpio
Earth Sciences
Ecologists
Ecology
Ecology and Environmental Sciences
Eggs
Experiments
Fish
Fish eggs
Fisheries
Fishes
Fishing
Hypotheses
Hypoxia
Introduced Species
Invasive fish
Invasive species
Lakes
Larvae
Lepomis macrochirus
Mississippi
Natural experiments
Nonnative species
Perciformes - physiology
Physical Sciences
Population
Predation
Predation (Biology)
Predatory Behavior - physiology
Recruitment
Reproduction
Reproduction - physiology
Spawning
Success
title A small native predator reduces reproductive success of a large invasive fish as revealed by whole-lake experiments
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-19T19%3A23%3A24IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_plos_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20small%20native%20predator%20reduces%20reproductive%20success%20of%20a%20large%20invasive%20fish%20as%20revealed%20by%20whole-lake%20experiments&rft.jtitle=PloS%20one&rft.au=Poole,%20Joshua%20R&rft.date=2019-04-03&rft.volume=14&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=e0214009&rft.epage=e0214009&rft.pages=e0214009-e0214009&rft.issn=1932-6203&rft.eissn=1932-6203&rft_id=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0214009&rft_dat=%3Cgale_plos_%3EA581128107%3C/gale_plos_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2203274311&rft_id=info:pmid/30943222&rft_galeid=A581128107&rft_doaj_id=oai_doaj_org_article_708ff71d0c654978985d0b05c0d1aed0&rfr_iscdi=true