Machine learning for patient risk stratification for acute respiratory distress syndrome

Existing prediction models for acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) require manual chart abstraction and have only fair performance-limiting their suitability for driving clinical interventions. We sought to develop a machine learning approach for the prediction of ARDS that (a) leverages elec...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:PloS one 2019-03, Vol.14 (3), p.e0214465-e0214465
Hauptverfasser: Zeiberg, Daniel, Prahlad, Tejas, Nallamothu, Brahmajee K, Iwashyna, Theodore J, Wiens, Jenna, Sjoding, Michael W
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page e0214465
container_issue 3
container_start_page e0214465
container_title PloS one
container_volume 14
creator Zeiberg, Daniel
Prahlad, Tejas
Nallamothu, Brahmajee K
Iwashyna, Theodore J
Wiens, Jenna
Sjoding, Michael W
description Existing prediction models for acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) require manual chart abstraction and have only fair performance-limiting their suitability for driving clinical interventions. We sought to develop a machine learning approach for the prediction of ARDS that (a) leverages electronic health record (EHR) data, (b) is fully automated, and (c) can be applied at clinically relevant time points throughout a patient's stay. We trained a risk stratification model for ARDS using a cohort of 1,621 patients with moderate hypoxia from a single center in 2016, of which 51 patients developed ARDS. We tested the model in a temporally distinct cohort of 1,122 patients from 2017, of which 27 patients developed ARDS. Gold standard diagnosis of ARDS was made by intensive care trained physicians during retrospective chart review. We considered both linear and non-linear approaches to learning the model. The best model used L2-logistic regression with 984 features extracted from the EHR. For patients observed in the hospital at least six hours who then developed moderate hypoxia, the model achieved an area under the receiver operating characteristics curve (AUROC) of 0.81 (95% CI: 0.73-0.88). Selecting a threshold based on the 85th percentile of risk, the model had a sensitivity of 56% (95% CI: 35%, 74%), specificity of 86% (95% CI: 85%, 87%) and positive predictive value of 9% (95% CI: 5%, 14%), identifying a population at four times higher risk for ARDS than other patients with moderate hypoxia and 17 times the risk of hospitalized adults. We developed an ARDS prediction model based on EHR data with good discriminative performance. Our results demonstrate the feasibility of a machine learning approach to risk stratifying patients for ARDS solely from data extracted automatically from the EHR.
doi_str_mv 10.1371/journal.pone.0214465
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_plos_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_plos_journals_2200226239</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A580430174</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_d260ff0580e746cb9ef7440c9e0c6777</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A580430174</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c758t-3ee0491a7b1cace095436fead1dddc90f6f24497946a1798de8b944ff5aae3823</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNk12L1DAUhoso7rr6D0QLgujFjPlq0twIy-LHwMqCX3gXMunJTMZOUpNWnH9vZqe7TGUvpNCmOc_7puf0nKJ4itEcU4HfbMIQvW7nXfAwRwQzxqt7xSmWlMw4QfT-0fqkeJTSBqGK1pw_LE4oklmA0Gnx45M2a-ehbEFH7_yqtCGWne4d-L6MLv0sUx_zq3Um34O_jmsz9FBGSJ3LsRB3ZeMyBimVaeebGLbwuHhgdZvgyfg8K769f_f14uPs8urD4uL8cmZEVfczCoCYxFossdEGkKwY5RZ0g5umMRJZbgljUkjGNRaybqBeSsasrbQGWhN6Vjw_-HZtSGosSlKEIEQIJ1RmYnEgmqA3qotuq-NOBe3U9UaIK6Vj70wLqiEcWYuqGoFg3CwlWMEYMhKQ4UKI7PV2PG1YbqExuUhRtxPTacS7tVqF34ozWleCZoNXo0EMvwZIvdq6ZKBttYcwHL5bCClrnNEX_6B3ZzdSK50TcN6GfK7Zm6rznAejCAuWqfkdVL4a2DqTO8i6vD8RvJ4IMtPDn36lh5TU4svn_2evvk_Zl0fsGnTbr1Noh31rpSnIDqCJIaUI9rbIGKn9ANxUQ-0HQI0DkGXPjn_Qreim4-lfpvABUA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2200226239</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Machine learning for patient risk stratification for acute respiratory distress syndrome</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Public Library of Science (PLoS) Journals Open Access</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry</source><creator>Zeiberg, Daniel ; Prahlad, Tejas ; Nallamothu, Brahmajee K ; Iwashyna, Theodore J ; Wiens, Jenna ; Sjoding, Michael W</creator><contributor>Mortazavi, Bobak</contributor><creatorcontrib>Zeiberg, Daniel ; Prahlad, Tejas ; Nallamothu, Brahmajee K ; Iwashyna, Theodore J ; Wiens, Jenna ; Sjoding, Michael W ; Mortazavi, Bobak</creatorcontrib><description>Existing prediction models for acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) require manual chart abstraction and have only fair performance-limiting their suitability for driving clinical interventions. We sought to develop a machine learning approach for the prediction of ARDS that (a) leverages electronic health record (EHR) data, (b) is fully automated, and (c) can be applied at clinically relevant time points throughout a patient's stay. We trained a risk stratification model for ARDS using a cohort of 1,621 patients with moderate hypoxia from a single center in 2016, of which 51 patients developed ARDS. We tested the model in a temporally distinct cohort of 1,122 patients from 2017, of which 27 patients developed ARDS. Gold standard diagnosis of ARDS was made by intensive care trained physicians during retrospective chart review. We considered both linear and non-linear approaches to learning the model. The best model used L2-logistic regression with 984 features extracted from the EHR. For patients observed in the hospital at least six hours who then developed moderate hypoxia, the model achieved an area under the receiver operating characteristics curve (AUROC) of 0.81 (95% CI: 0.73-0.88). Selecting a threshold based on the 85th percentile of risk, the model had a sensitivity of 56% (95% CI: 35%, 74%), specificity of 86% (95% CI: 85%, 87%) and positive predictive value of 9% (95% CI: 5%, 14%), identifying a population at four times higher risk for ARDS than other patients with moderate hypoxia and 17 times the risk of hospitalized adults. We developed an ARDS prediction model based on EHR data with good discriminative performance. Our results demonstrate the feasibility of a machine learning approach to risk stratifying patients for ARDS solely from data extracted automatically from the EHR.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0214465</identifier><identifier>PMID: 30921400</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Public Library of Science</publisher><subject>Adult respiratory distress syndrome ; Adults ; Aged ; Artificial intelligence ; Biology and Life Sciences ; Clinical medicine ; Computer and Information Sciences ; Computer science ; Critical care ; Data mining ; Electronic health records ; Electronic medical records ; Electronic records ; Feasibility studies ; Feature extraction ; Female ; Health ; Health care policy ; Hospitalization ; Hospitals ; Humans ; Hypoxia ; Illnesses ; Internal medicine ; International conferences ; Knowledge discovery ; Learning algorithms ; Machine Learning ; Male ; Medical personnel ; Medical research ; Medicine ; Medicine and Health Sciences ; Middle Aged ; Model testing ; Models, Statistical ; Pathogenesis ; Patients ; People and Places ; Physical Sciences ; Physicians ; Physiology ; Prediction models ; Regression models ; Research and Analysis Methods ; Respiratory distress syndrome ; Respiratory Distress Syndrome, Adult - epidemiology ; Risk ; Risk Assessment - methods ; Ventilators</subject><ispartof>PloS one, 2019-03, Vol.14 (3), p.e0214465-e0214465</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2019 Public Library of Science</rights><rights>2019 Zeiberg et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>2019 Zeiberg et al 2019 Zeiberg et al</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c758t-3ee0491a7b1cace095436fead1dddc90f6f24497946a1798de8b944ff5aae3823</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c758t-3ee0491a7b1cace095436fead1dddc90f6f24497946a1798de8b944ff5aae3823</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-0535-9659 ; 0000-0002-6919-7572</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6438573/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6438573/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,864,885,2102,2928,23866,27924,27925,53791,53793,79472,79473</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30921400$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Mortazavi, Bobak</contributor><creatorcontrib>Zeiberg, Daniel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Prahlad, Tejas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nallamothu, Brahmajee K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Iwashyna, Theodore J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wiens, Jenna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sjoding, Michael W</creatorcontrib><title>Machine learning for patient risk stratification for acute respiratory distress syndrome</title><title>PloS one</title><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><description>Existing prediction models for acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) require manual chart abstraction and have only fair performance-limiting their suitability for driving clinical interventions. We sought to develop a machine learning approach for the prediction of ARDS that (a) leverages electronic health record (EHR) data, (b) is fully automated, and (c) can be applied at clinically relevant time points throughout a patient's stay. We trained a risk stratification model for ARDS using a cohort of 1,621 patients with moderate hypoxia from a single center in 2016, of which 51 patients developed ARDS. We tested the model in a temporally distinct cohort of 1,122 patients from 2017, of which 27 patients developed ARDS. Gold standard diagnosis of ARDS was made by intensive care trained physicians during retrospective chart review. We considered both linear and non-linear approaches to learning the model. The best model used L2-logistic regression with 984 features extracted from the EHR. For patients observed in the hospital at least six hours who then developed moderate hypoxia, the model achieved an area under the receiver operating characteristics curve (AUROC) of 0.81 (95% CI: 0.73-0.88). Selecting a threshold based on the 85th percentile of risk, the model had a sensitivity of 56% (95% CI: 35%, 74%), specificity of 86% (95% CI: 85%, 87%) and positive predictive value of 9% (95% CI: 5%, 14%), identifying a population at four times higher risk for ARDS than other patients with moderate hypoxia and 17 times the risk of hospitalized adults. We developed an ARDS prediction model based on EHR data with good discriminative performance. Our results demonstrate the feasibility of a machine learning approach to risk stratifying patients for ARDS solely from data extracted automatically from the EHR.</description><subject>Adult respiratory distress syndrome</subject><subject>Adults</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Artificial intelligence</subject><subject>Biology and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Clinical medicine</subject><subject>Computer and Information Sciences</subject><subject>Computer science</subject><subject>Critical care</subject><subject>Data mining</subject><subject>Electronic health records</subject><subject>Electronic medical records</subject><subject>Electronic records</subject><subject>Feasibility studies</subject><subject>Feature extraction</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Health</subject><subject>Health care policy</subject><subject>Hospitalization</subject><subject>Hospitals</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Hypoxia</subject><subject>Illnesses</subject><subject>Internal medicine</subject><subject>International conferences</subject><subject>Knowledge discovery</subject><subject>Learning algorithms</subject><subject>Machine Learning</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical personnel</subject><subject>Medical research</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine and Health Sciences</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Model testing</subject><subject>Models, Statistical</subject><subject>Pathogenesis</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>People and Places</subject><subject>Physical Sciences</subject><subject>Physicians</subject><subject>Physiology</subject><subject>Prediction models</subject><subject>Regression models</subject><subject>Research and Analysis Methods</subject><subject>Respiratory distress syndrome</subject><subject>Respiratory Distress Syndrome, Adult - epidemiology</subject><subject>Risk</subject><subject>Risk Assessment - methods</subject><subject>Ventilators</subject><issn>1932-6203</issn><issn>1932-6203</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNqNk12L1DAUhoso7rr6D0QLgujFjPlq0twIy-LHwMqCX3gXMunJTMZOUpNWnH9vZqe7TGUvpNCmOc_7puf0nKJ4itEcU4HfbMIQvW7nXfAwRwQzxqt7xSmWlMw4QfT-0fqkeJTSBqGK1pw_LE4oklmA0Gnx45M2a-ehbEFH7_yqtCGWne4d-L6MLv0sUx_zq3Um34O_jmsz9FBGSJ3LsRB3ZeMyBimVaeebGLbwuHhgdZvgyfg8K769f_f14uPs8urD4uL8cmZEVfczCoCYxFossdEGkKwY5RZ0g5umMRJZbgljUkjGNRaybqBeSsasrbQGWhN6Vjw_-HZtSGosSlKEIEQIJ1RmYnEgmqA3qotuq-NOBe3U9UaIK6Vj70wLqiEcWYuqGoFg3CwlWMEYMhKQ4UKI7PV2PG1YbqExuUhRtxPTacS7tVqF34ozWleCZoNXo0EMvwZIvdq6ZKBttYcwHL5bCClrnNEX_6B3ZzdSK50TcN6GfK7Zm6rznAejCAuWqfkdVL4a2DqTO8i6vD8RvJ4IMtPDn36lh5TU4svn_2evvk_Zl0fsGnTbr1Noh31rpSnIDqCJIaUI9rbIGKn9ANxUQ-0HQI0DkGXPjn_Qreim4-lfpvABUA</recordid><startdate>20190328</startdate><enddate>20190328</enddate><creator>Zeiberg, Daniel</creator><creator>Prahlad, Tejas</creator><creator>Nallamothu, Brahmajee K</creator><creator>Iwashyna, Theodore J</creator><creator>Wiens, Jenna</creator><creator>Sjoding, Michael W</creator><general>Public Library of Science</general><general>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>IOV</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0535-9659</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6919-7572</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20190328</creationdate><title>Machine learning for patient risk stratification for acute respiratory distress syndrome</title><author>Zeiberg, Daniel ; Prahlad, Tejas ; Nallamothu, Brahmajee K ; Iwashyna, Theodore J ; Wiens, Jenna ; Sjoding, Michael W</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c758t-3ee0491a7b1cace095436fead1dddc90f6f24497946a1798de8b944ff5aae3823</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Adult respiratory distress syndrome</topic><topic>Adults</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Artificial intelligence</topic><topic>Biology and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Clinical medicine</topic><topic>Computer and Information Sciences</topic><topic>Computer science</topic><topic>Critical care</topic><topic>Data mining</topic><topic>Electronic health records</topic><topic>Electronic medical records</topic><topic>Electronic records</topic><topic>Feasibility studies</topic><topic>Feature extraction</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Health</topic><topic>Health care policy</topic><topic>Hospitalization</topic><topic>Hospitals</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Hypoxia</topic><topic>Illnesses</topic><topic>Internal medicine</topic><topic>International conferences</topic><topic>Knowledge discovery</topic><topic>Learning algorithms</topic><topic>Machine Learning</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical personnel</topic><topic>Medical research</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine and Health Sciences</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Model testing</topic><topic>Models, Statistical</topic><topic>Pathogenesis</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>People and Places</topic><topic>Physical Sciences</topic><topic>Physicians</topic><topic>Physiology</topic><topic>Prediction models</topic><topic>Regression models</topic><topic>Research and Analysis Methods</topic><topic>Respiratory distress syndrome</topic><topic>Respiratory Distress Syndrome, Adult - epidemiology</topic><topic>Risk</topic><topic>Risk Assessment - methods</topic><topic>Ventilators</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Zeiberg, Daniel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Prahlad, Tejas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nallamothu, Brahmajee K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Iwashyna, Theodore J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wiens, Jenna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sjoding, Michael W</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Opposing Viewpoints</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Proquest Nursing &amp; Allied Health Source</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Materials Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Zeiberg, Daniel</au><au>Prahlad, Tejas</au><au>Nallamothu, Brahmajee K</au><au>Iwashyna, Theodore J</au><au>Wiens, Jenna</au><au>Sjoding, Michael W</au><au>Mortazavi, Bobak</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Machine learning for patient risk stratification for acute respiratory distress syndrome</atitle><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><date>2019-03-28</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>14</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>e0214465</spage><epage>e0214465</epage><pages>e0214465-e0214465</pages><issn>1932-6203</issn><eissn>1932-6203</eissn><abstract>Existing prediction models for acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) require manual chart abstraction and have only fair performance-limiting their suitability for driving clinical interventions. We sought to develop a machine learning approach for the prediction of ARDS that (a) leverages electronic health record (EHR) data, (b) is fully automated, and (c) can be applied at clinically relevant time points throughout a patient's stay. We trained a risk stratification model for ARDS using a cohort of 1,621 patients with moderate hypoxia from a single center in 2016, of which 51 patients developed ARDS. We tested the model in a temporally distinct cohort of 1,122 patients from 2017, of which 27 patients developed ARDS. Gold standard diagnosis of ARDS was made by intensive care trained physicians during retrospective chart review. We considered both linear and non-linear approaches to learning the model. The best model used L2-logistic regression with 984 features extracted from the EHR. For patients observed in the hospital at least six hours who then developed moderate hypoxia, the model achieved an area under the receiver operating characteristics curve (AUROC) of 0.81 (95% CI: 0.73-0.88). Selecting a threshold based on the 85th percentile of risk, the model had a sensitivity of 56% (95% CI: 35%, 74%), specificity of 86% (95% CI: 85%, 87%) and positive predictive value of 9% (95% CI: 5%, 14%), identifying a population at four times higher risk for ARDS than other patients with moderate hypoxia and 17 times the risk of hospitalized adults. We developed an ARDS prediction model based on EHR data with good discriminative performance. Our results demonstrate the feasibility of a machine learning approach to risk stratifying patients for ARDS solely from data extracted automatically from the EHR.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Public Library of Science</pub><pmid>30921400</pmid><doi>10.1371/journal.pone.0214465</doi><tpages>e0214465</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0535-9659</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6919-7572</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1932-6203
ispartof PloS one, 2019-03, Vol.14 (3), p.e0214465-e0214465
issn 1932-6203
1932-6203
language eng
recordid cdi_plos_journals_2200226239
source MEDLINE; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Public Library of Science (PLoS) Journals Open Access; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central; Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry
subjects Adult respiratory distress syndrome
Adults
Aged
Artificial intelligence
Biology and Life Sciences
Clinical medicine
Computer and Information Sciences
Computer science
Critical care
Data mining
Electronic health records
Electronic medical records
Electronic records
Feasibility studies
Feature extraction
Female
Health
Health care policy
Hospitalization
Hospitals
Humans
Hypoxia
Illnesses
Internal medicine
International conferences
Knowledge discovery
Learning algorithms
Machine Learning
Male
Medical personnel
Medical research
Medicine
Medicine and Health Sciences
Middle Aged
Model testing
Models, Statistical
Pathogenesis
Patients
People and Places
Physical Sciences
Physicians
Physiology
Prediction models
Regression models
Research and Analysis Methods
Respiratory distress syndrome
Respiratory Distress Syndrome, Adult - epidemiology
Risk
Risk Assessment - methods
Ventilators
title Machine learning for patient risk stratification for acute respiratory distress syndrome
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T22%3A25%3A26IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_plos_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Machine%20learning%20for%20patient%20risk%20stratification%20for%20acute%20respiratory%20distress%20syndrome&rft.jtitle=PloS%20one&rft.au=Zeiberg,%20Daniel&rft.date=2019-03-28&rft.volume=14&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=e0214465&rft.epage=e0214465&rft.pages=e0214465-e0214465&rft.issn=1932-6203&rft.eissn=1932-6203&rft_id=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0214465&rft_dat=%3Cgale_plos_%3EA580430174%3C/gale_plos_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2200226239&rft_id=info:pmid/30921400&rft_galeid=A580430174&rft_doaj_id=oai_doaj_org_article_d260ff0580e746cb9ef7440c9e0c6777&rfr_iscdi=true