Visuo-spatial (but not verbal) executive working memory capacity modulates susceptibility to non-numerical visual magnitudes during numerosity comparison
The present study tested whether visuo-spatial vs. verbal executive working memory capacity (hereafter EWM) modulates the degree to which non-numerical visual magnitudes influence numerosity comparison using pairs of dot arrays. We hypothesized that visuo-spatial (rather than verbal) EWM capacity wo...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | PloS one 2019-03, Vol.14 (3), p.e0214270-e0214270 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | e0214270 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 3 |
| container_start_page | e0214270 |
| container_title | PloS one |
| container_volume | 14 |
| creator | Lee, Kyungmin Cho, Soohyun |
| description | The present study tested whether visuo-spatial vs. verbal executive working memory capacity (hereafter EWM) modulates the degree to which non-numerical visual magnitudes influence numerosity comparison using pairs of dot arrays. We hypothesized that visuo-spatial (rather than verbal) EWM capacity would influence one's ability to selectively focus on numerical as opposed to non-numerical visual properties (such as dot size, cumulative area, density) of the dot arrays during numerosity comparison. Participants' performance was better on trials in which non-numerical visual magnitudes were negatively (vs. positively) correlated with numerosity (i.e., reverse congruency effect). The Low visuo-spatial EWM group manifested greater reverse congruency effect compared to the High visuo-spatial EWM group. A trial-based hierarchical regression on the accuracy of each trial using the ratio of (numerical and non-numerical) visual magnitudes as predictors revealed that the ratio of numerical vs. non-numerical visual magnitudes explained the greatest variance in the performance of the High vs. Low visuo-spatial EWM groups, respectively. In contrast, there was no difference between the High vs. Low verbal EWM groups from the same analysis. These results reveal differential susceptibility to numerical vs. non-numerical visual information depending on the capacity of visuo-spatial (but not verbal) EWM. Taken together, numerosity comparison performance measured with the dot comparison paradigm seems to reflect not only one's acuity for numerosity discrimination but also visuo-spatial EWM capacity likely required during integration of visual magnitudes during numerosity comparison. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1371/journal.pone.0214270 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_plos_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_plos_journals_2199320471</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A580304646</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_33bf2c5a18c141f9907971ea189c92bb</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A580304646</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c593t-e876d78dc56935962c09b9685675daf09d769c8c571706cfa8dcdee5219f85223</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptUstu1DAUjRCIlsIfIIjEpiwy2HFsxxukquJRqRIbYGs5thM8JHbwY2A-hb_F6aRVB1VeXNv3nHN9r09RvIRgAxGF77YueSvGzeys3oAaNjUFj4pTyFBdkRqgx_f2J8WzELYAYNQS8rQ4QYBBCnF7Wvz9bkJyVZhFNGIsz7sUS-tiudO-E-PbUv_RMkWz0-Vv538aO5STnpzfl1LMQpq4Lyen0iiiDmVIQeo5ms6MSyK6rGQrmybtjcziu1wqh0kM1sSkMkMlv0jeQFxYSNJNs_AmOPu8eNKLMegXazwrvn388PXyc3X95dPV5cV1JTFDsdItJYq2SmLCEGakloB1jLSYUKxED5iihMlWYgopILIXGaq0xjVkfYvrGp0Vrw-68-gCX6caeM7n6YGGwoy4OiCUE1s-ezMJv-dOGH5z4fzAhY9Gjpoj1PW1xAK2EjawZwxQRqHOZyZZ3XVZ6_1aLXWTVlLb6MV4JHqcseYHH9yOkwYRikgWOF8FvPuVdIh8Mnns4yisdunwbtiiGi-dvfkP-nB3K2oQuQFje5frykWUX-AWINCQZim7eQCVl9KTkdmCvcn3R4TmQJD5Z4PX_V2PEPDFwLeP4YuB-WrgTHt1fz53pFvHon9SQ_F-</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2199320471</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Visuo-spatial (but not verbal) executive working memory capacity modulates susceptibility to non-numerical visual magnitudes during numerosity comparison</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Public Library of Science (PLoS) Journals Open Access</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry</source><creator>Lee, Kyungmin ; Cho, Soohyun</creator><contributor>Fischer, Ursula</contributor><creatorcontrib>Lee, Kyungmin ; Cho, Soohyun ; Fischer, Ursula</creatorcontrib><description>The present study tested whether visuo-spatial vs. verbal executive working memory capacity (hereafter EWM) modulates the degree to which non-numerical visual magnitudes influence numerosity comparison using pairs of dot arrays. We hypothesized that visuo-spatial (rather than verbal) EWM capacity would influence one's ability to selectively focus on numerical as opposed to non-numerical visual properties (such as dot size, cumulative area, density) of the dot arrays during numerosity comparison. Participants' performance was better on trials in which non-numerical visual magnitudes were negatively (vs. positively) correlated with numerosity (i.e., reverse congruency effect). The Low visuo-spatial EWM group manifested greater reverse congruency effect compared to the High visuo-spatial EWM group. A trial-based hierarchical regression on the accuracy of each trial using the ratio of (numerical and non-numerical) visual magnitudes as predictors revealed that the ratio of numerical vs. non-numerical visual magnitudes explained the greatest variance in the performance of the High vs. Low visuo-spatial EWM groups, respectively. In contrast, there was no difference between the High vs. Low verbal EWM groups from the same analysis. These results reveal differential susceptibility to numerical vs. non-numerical visual information depending on the capacity of visuo-spatial (but not verbal) EWM. Taken together, numerosity comparison performance measured with the dot comparison paradigm seems to reflect not only one's acuity for numerosity discrimination but also visuo-spatial EWM capacity likely required during integration of visual magnitudes during numerosity comparison.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0214270</identifier><identifier>PMID: 30917158</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Public Library of Science</publisher><subject>Acuity ; Analysis ; Arrays ; Automation ; Behavior ; Biology and Life Sciences ; Brain research ; Children & youth ; Cognition & reasoning ; Education ; Female ; Humans ; Language ; Male ; Mathematical Concepts ; Mathematics ; Medicine and Health Sciences ; Memory ; Memory, Short-Term - physiology ; Neuropsychological Tests ; Neurosciences ; Pattern Recognition, Visual ; People and Places ; Physical Sciences ; Psychology ; Regression analysis ; Research and Analysis Methods ; Research methodology ; Short term memory ; Skills ; Social Sciences ; Space Perception ; Spatial Memory - physiology ; Verbal learning ; Visual discrimination ; Visual learning ; Visual Perception - physiology ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>PloS one, 2019-03, Vol.14 (3), p.e0214270-e0214270</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2019 Public Library of Science</rights><rights>2019 Lee, Cho. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>2019 Lee, Cho 2019 Lee, Cho</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c593t-e876d78dc56935962c09b9685675daf09d769c8c571706cfa8dcdee5219f85223</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c593t-e876d78dc56935962c09b9685675daf09d769c8c571706cfa8dcdee5219f85223</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-6360-2365 ; 0000-0001-5845-6893</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6436736/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6436736/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,864,885,2102,2928,23866,27924,27925,53791,53793</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30917158$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Fischer, Ursula</contributor><creatorcontrib>Lee, Kyungmin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cho, Soohyun</creatorcontrib><title>Visuo-spatial (but not verbal) executive working memory capacity modulates susceptibility to non-numerical visual magnitudes during numerosity comparison</title><title>PloS one</title><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><description>The present study tested whether visuo-spatial vs. verbal executive working memory capacity (hereafter EWM) modulates the degree to which non-numerical visual magnitudes influence numerosity comparison using pairs of dot arrays. We hypothesized that visuo-spatial (rather than verbal) EWM capacity would influence one's ability to selectively focus on numerical as opposed to non-numerical visual properties (such as dot size, cumulative area, density) of the dot arrays during numerosity comparison. Participants' performance was better on trials in which non-numerical visual magnitudes were negatively (vs. positively) correlated with numerosity (i.e., reverse congruency effect). The Low visuo-spatial EWM group manifested greater reverse congruency effect compared to the High visuo-spatial EWM group. A trial-based hierarchical regression on the accuracy of each trial using the ratio of (numerical and non-numerical) visual magnitudes as predictors revealed that the ratio of numerical vs. non-numerical visual magnitudes explained the greatest variance in the performance of the High vs. Low visuo-spatial EWM groups, respectively. In contrast, there was no difference between the High vs. Low verbal EWM groups from the same analysis. These results reveal differential susceptibility to numerical vs. non-numerical visual information depending on the capacity of visuo-spatial (but not verbal) EWM. Taken together, numerosity comparison performance measured with the dot comparison paradigm seems to reflect not only one's acuity for numerosity discrimination but also visuo-spatial EWM capacity likely required during integration of visual magnitudes during numerosity comparison.</description><subject>Acuity</subject><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>Arrays</subject><subject>Automation</subject><subject>Behavior</subject><subject>Biology and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Brain research</subject><subject>Children & youth</subject><subject>Cognition & reasoning</subject><subject>Education</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Language</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Mathematical Concepts</subject><subject>Mathematics</subject><subject>Medicine and Health Sciences</subject><subject>Memory</subject><subject>Memory, Short-Term - physiology</subject><subject>Neuropsychological Tests</subject><subject>Neurosciences</subject><subject>Pattern Recognition, Visual</subject><subject>People and Places</subject><subject>Physical Sciences</subject><subject>Psychology</subject><subject>Regression analysis</subject><subject>Research and Analysis Methods</subject><subject>Research methodology</subject><subject>Short term memory</subject><subject>Skills</subject><subject>Social Sciences</subject><subject>Space Perception</subject><subject>Spatial Memory - physiology</subject><subject>Verbal learning</subject><subject>Visual discrimination</subject><subject>Visual learning</subject><subject>Visual Perception - physiology</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>1932-6203</issn><issn>1932-6203</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNptUstu1DAUjRCIlsIfIIjEpiwy2HFsxxukquJRqRIbYGs5thM8JHbwY2A-hb_F6aRVB1VeXNv3nHN9r09RvIRgAxGF77YueSvGzeys3oAaNjUFj4pTyFBdkRqgx_f2J8WzELYAYNQS8rQ4QYBBCnF7Wvz9bkJyVZhFNGIsz7sUS-tiudO-E-PbUv_RMkWz0-Vv538aO5STnpzfl1LMQpq4Lyen0iiiDmVIQeo5ms6MSyK6rGQrmybtjcziu1wqh0kM1sSkMkMlv0jeQFxYSNJNs_AmOPu8eNKLMegXazwrvn388PXyc3X95dPV5cV1JTFDsdItJYq2SmLCEGakloB1jLSYUKxED5iihMlWYgopILIXGaq0xjVkfYvrGp0Vrw-68-gCX6caeM7n6YGGwoy4OiCUE1s-ezMJv-dOGH5z4fzAhY9Gjpoj1PW1xAK2EjawZwxQRqHOZyZZ3XVZ6_1aLXWTVlLb6MV4JHqcseYHH9yOkwYRikgWOF8FvPuVdIh8Mnns4yisdunwbtiiGi-dvfkP-nB3K2oQuQFje5frykWUX-AWINCQZim7eQCVl9KTkdmCvcn3R4TmQJD5Z4PX_V2PEPDFwLeP4YuB-WrgTHt1fz53pFvHon9SQ_F-</recordid><startdate>20190327</startdate><enddate>20190327</enddate><creator>Lee, Kyungmin</creator><creator>Cho, Soohyun</creator><general>Public Library of Science</general><general>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6360-2365</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5845-6893</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20190327</creationdate><title>Visuo-spatial (but not verbal) executive working memory capacity modulates susceptibility to non-numerical visual magnitudes during numerosity comparison</title><author>Lee, Kyungmin ; Cho, Soohyun</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c593t-e876d78dc56935962c09b9685675daf09d769c8c571706cfa8dcdee5219f85223</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Acuity</topic><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>Arrays</topic><topic>Automation</topic><topic>Behavior</topic><topic>Biology and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Brain research</topic><topic>Children & youth</topic><topic>Cognition & reasoning</topic><topic>Education</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Language</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Mathematical Concepts</topic><topic>Mathematics</topic><topic>Medicine and Health Sciences</topic><topic>Memory</topic><topic>Memory, Short-Term - physiology</topic><topic>Neuropsychological Tests</topic><topic>Neurosciences</topic><topic>Pattern Recognition, Visual</topic><topic>People and Places</topic><topic>Physical Sciences</topic><topic>Psychology</topic><topic>Regression analysis</topic><topic>Research and Analysis Methods</topic><topic>Research methodology</topic><topic>Short term memory</topic><topic>Skills</topic><topic>Social Sciences</topic><topic>Space Perception</topic><topic>Spatial Memory - physiology</topic><topic>Verbal learning</topic><topic>Visual discrimination</topic><topic>Visual learning</topic><topic>Visual Perception - physiology</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lee, Kyungmin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cho, Soohyun</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Materials Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lee, Kyungmin</au><au>Cho, Soohyun</au><au>Fischer, Ursula</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Visuo-spatial (but not verbal) executive working memory capacity modulates susceptibility to non-numerical visual magnitudes during numerosity comparison</atitle><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><date>2019-03-27</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>14</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>e0214270</spage><epage>e0214270</epage><pages>e0214270-e0214270</pages><issn>1932-6203</issn><eissn>1932-6203</eissn><abstract>The present study tested whether visuo-spatial vs. verbal executive working memory capacity (hereafter EWM) modulates the degree to which non-numerical visual magnitudes influence numerosity comparison using pairs of dot arrays. We hypothesized that visuo-spatial (rather than verbal) EWM capacity would influence one's ability to selectively focus on numerical as opposed to non-numerical visual properties (such as dot size, cumulative area, density) of the dot arrays during numerosity comparison. Participants' performance was better on trials in which non-numerical visual magnitudes were negatively (vs. positively) correlated with numerosity (i.e., reverse congruency effect). The Low visuo-spatial EWM group manifested greater reverse congruency effect compared to the High visuo-spatial EWM group. A trial-based hierarchical regression on the accuracy of each trial using the ratio of (numerical and non-numerical) visual magnitudes as predictors revealed that the ratio of numerical vs. non-numerical visual magnitudes explained the greatest variance in the performance of the High vs. Low visuo-spatial EWM groups, respectively. In contrast, there was no difference between the High vs. Low verbal EWM groups from the same analysis. These results reveal differential susceptibility to numerical vs. non-numerical visual information depending on the capacity of visuo-spatial (but not verbal) EWM. Taken together, numerosity comparison performance measured with the dot comparison paradigm seems to reflect not only one's acuity for numerosity discrimination but also visuo-spatial EWM capacity likely required during integration of visual magnitudes during numerosity comparison.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Public Library of Science</pub><pmid>30917158</pmid><doi>10.1371/journal.pone.0214270</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6360-2365</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5845-6893</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 1932-6203 |
| ispartof | PloS one, 2019-03, Vol.14 (3), p.e0214270-e0214270 |
| issn | 1932-6203 1932-6203 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_plos_journals_2199320471 |
| source | MEDLINE; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Public Library of Science (PLoS) Journals Open Access; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central; Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry |
| subjects | Acuity Analysis Arrays Automation Behavior Biology and Life Sciences Brain research Children & youth Cognition & reasoning Education Female Humans Language Male Mathematical Concepts Mathematics Medicine and Health Sciences Memory Memory, Short-Term - physiology Neuropsychological Tests Neurosciences Pattern Recognition, Visual People and Places Physical Sciences Psychology Regression analysis Research and Analysis Methods Research methodology Short term memory Skills Social Sciences Space Perception Spatial Memory - physiology Verbal learning Visual discrimination Visual learning Visual Perception - physiology Young Adult |
| title | Visuo-spatial (but not verbal) executive working memory capacity modulates susceptibility to non-numerical visual magnitudes during numerosity comparison |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-19T06%3A58%3A35IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_plos_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Visuo-spatial%20(but%20not%20verbal)%20executive%20working%20memory%20capacity%20modulates%20susceptibility%20to%20non-numerical%20visual%20magnitudes%20during%20numerosity%20comparison&rft.jtitle=PloS%20one&rft.au=Lee,%20Kyungmin&rft.date=2019-03-27&rft.volume=14&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=e0214270&rft.epage=e0214270&rft.pages=e0214270-e0214270&rft.issn=1932-6203&rft.eissn=1932-6203&rft_id=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0214270&rft_dat=%3Cgale_plos_%3EA580304646%3C/gale_plos_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2199320471&rft_id=info:pmid/30917158&rft_galeid=A580304646&rft_doaj_id=oai_doaj_org_article_33bf2c5a18c141f9907971ea189c92bb&rfr_iscdi=true |