Habitat-mediated breeding performance of Lewis's Woodpeckers (Melanerpes lewis) in British Columbia
Tree cavities provide a critical resource for cavity-nesting animals, and high quality cavities can be difficult for animals to acquire in habitats where competition is high. We investigated the breeding performance of Lewis's Woodpeckers in three habitat types in British Columbia, Canada in 20...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | PloS one 2019-03, Vol.14 (3), p.e0212929 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | e0212929 |
container_title | PloS one |
container_volume | 14 |
creator | Macfarland, Lauren Mahony, Nancy A Harrison, Megan Green, David |
description | Tree cavities provide a critical resource for cavity-nesting animals, and high quality cavities can be difficult for animals to acquire in habitats where competition is high. We investigated the breeding performance of Lewis's Woodpeckers in three habitat types in British Columbia, Canada in 2013 and 2014. We also assessed whether the number of nest competitors and cavity availability influenced the habitat specific breeding performance of this threatened cavity nesting species. We found that daily nest survival rate was lower in burned habitat (0.15 ± 0.08 (0.05-0.37)) than in live pine (0.72 ± 0.10 (0.51-0.87)) or cottonwood (0.69 ± 0.09 (0.51-0.83)) habitats. However, hatching success (the proportion of eggs that hatch) was lower in live pine habitat (0.59 ± 0.09 95% CI) than burned (0.77 ± 0.19 95% CI) or cottonwood (0.80 ± 0.07 95% CI) habitat, and the fledging success of successful nests in live pine and burned habitat (1.86 ± 0.31 and 1.88 ± 0.59 95% CI, respectively) was slightly lower than in cottonwood habitat (2.61 ± 0.45 95% CI). Consequently, Lewis's Woodpeckers in cottonwood habitat produced more fledglings per nesting attempt (2.05 ± 0.49 95% CI) than in live pine (1.53 ± 0.35 95% CI) or burned (0.79 ± 0.49 95% CI) habitat. Habitats differed in the number of nesting competitors and the number of suitable cavities surrounding active Lewis's Woodpecker nests. Our results showed that cavity density best explained breeding performance differences although the mechanisms remain unclear. There was no evidence that the number of heterospecific nest competitors, including the invasive European Starling (Sturnus vulgaris), explained or influenced Lewis's Woodpecker breeding performance. Cavity density influenced the productivity of successful nests but did not explain habitat differences in hatching success or daily nest survival. Further work is required to understand the mechanistic basis for the habitat specific breeding performance of Lewis's Woodpeckers. Habitat differences in breeding performance in British Columbia are not consistent with those in other regions, highlighting the importance of regionally-specific demographic data for managing species at risk. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1371/journal.pone.0212929 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_plos_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_plos_journals_2195361382</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A579457478</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_0a4508310e50446898fd012a97942f60</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A579457478</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c593t-ad833230de153ab8cda458873d2b73fad52edb566e9115b837005473fb4e47493</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1Uk2LFDEQbURxP_QfiAY8rB5mzHcnF2Ed1F0Y8aJ4DOmkejZjd6dNehT_vRmnd9kBJYcUVa9evSpeVT0jeElYTd5s4y4NtluOcYAlpoRqqh9Up0QzupAUs4f34pPqLOctxoIpKR9XJwwrzRgXp5W7sk2Y7LTowQc7gUdNghIOGzRCamPq7eAAxRat4VfIFxl9i9GP4L5DyujVJ-jsAGmEjLp9_TUKA3qXwhTyDVrFbtc3wT6pHrW2y_B0_s-rrx_ef1ldLdafP16vLtcLJzSbFtYrxijDHohgtlHOWy6UqpmnTc1a6wUF3wgpQRMiGsXqshAvlYYDr7lm59WLA-_YxWzm-2RDiRZMEqZoQVwfED7arRlT6G36baIN5m8ipo2xaQquA4PLcKwYwSAw51Jp1XpMqNW15rSVuHC9naftmnI8B8OUbHdEelwZwo3ZxJ9GciqJ2hO8nAlS_LGDPP1H8oza2KIqDG0sZK4P2ZlLUbSImteqoJb_QJXnoQ-uOKQNJX_UwA8NLsWcE7R3wgk2e3_dijF7f5nZX6Xt-f2l75puDcX-AN3BzCs</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2195361382</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Habitat-mediated breeding performance of Lewis's Woodpeckers (Melanerpes lewis) in British Columbia</title><source>Public Library of Science (PLoS) Journals Open Access</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>EZB Free E-Journals</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry</source><creator>Macfarland, Lauren ; Mahony, Nancy A ; Harrison, Megan ; Green, David</creator><contributor>Kajtoch, Łukasz</contributor><creatorcontrib>Macfarland, Lauren ; Mahony, Nancy A ; Harrison, Megan ; Green, David ; Kajtoch, Łukasz</creatorcontrib><description>Tree cavities provide a critical resource for cavity-nesting animals, and high quality cavities can be difficult for animals to acquire in habitats where competition is high. We investigated the breeding performance of Lewis's Woodpeckers in three habitat types in British Columbia, Canada in 2013 and 2014. We also assessed whether the number of nest competitors and cavity availability influenced the habitat specific breeding performance of this threatened cavity nesting species. We found that daily nest survival rate was lower in burned habitat (0.15 ± 0.08 (0.05-0.37)) than in live pine (0.72 ± 0.10 (0.51-0.87)) or cottonwood (0.69 ± 0.09 (0.51-0.83)) habitats. However, hatching success (the proportion of eggs that hatch) was lower in live pine habitat (0.59 ± 0.09 95% CI) than burned (0.77 ± 0.19 95% CI) or cottonwood (0.80 ± 0.07 95% CI) habitat, and the fledging success of successful nests in live pine and burned habitat (1.86 ± 0.31 and 1.88 ± 0.59 95% CI, respectively) was slightly lower than in cottonwood habitat (2.61 ± 0.45 95% CI). Consequently, Lewis's Woodpeckers in cottonwood habitat produced more fledglings per nesting attempt (2.05 ± 0.49 95% CI) than in live pine (1.53 ± 0.35 95% CI) or burned (0.79 ± 0.49 95% CI) habitat. Habitats differed in the number of nesting competitors and the number of suitable cavities surrounding active Lewis's Woodpecker nests. Our results showed that cavity density best explained breeding performance differences although the mechanisms remain unclear. There was no evidence that the number of heterospecific nest competitors, including the invasive European Starling (Sturnus vulgaris), explained or influenced Lewis's Woodpecker breeding performance. Cavity density influenced the productivity of successful nests but did not explain habitat differences in hatching success or daily nest survival. Further work is required to understand the mechanistic basis for the habitat specific breeding performance of Lewis's Woodpeckers. Habitat differences in breeding performance in British Columbia are not consistent with those in other regions, highlighting the importance of regionally-specific demographic data for managing species at risk.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0212929</identifier><identifier>PMID: 30893345</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Public Library of Science</publisher><subject>Analysis ; Animal behavior ; Animals ; Behavior ; Biology and Life Sciences ; Birds ; Birds - physiology ; Breeding ; British Columbia ; Cavities ; Cavity nesting ; Conservation of Natural Resources - methods ; Demographics ; Density ; Ecology and Environmental Sciences ; Eggs ; Endangered Species ; Forests ; Habitats ; Hatching ; Introduced Species ; Juveniles ; Nesting ; Nesting Behavior - physiology ; Nests ; People and places ; Picidae ; Pine ; Production management ; Risk management ; Sexual Behavior, Animal - physiology ; Social Sciences ; Sturnus vulgaris ; Survival ; Threatened species ; Trees ; Wildlife conservation ; Wildlife management ; Woodpeckers</subject><ispartof>PloS one, 2019-03, Vol.14 (3), p.e0212929</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2019 Public Library of Science</rights><rights>2019 Macfarland et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>2019 Macfarland et al 2019 Macfarland et al</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c593t-ad833230de153ab8cda458873d2b73fad52edb566e9115b837005473fb4e47493</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c593t-ad833230de153ab8cda458873d2b73fad52edb566e9115b837005473fb4e47493</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-2767-6695</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6426180/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6426180/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,864,885,2102,2928,23866,27924,27925,53791,53793,79600,79601</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30893345$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Kajtoch, Łukasz</contributor><creatorcontrib>Macfarland, Lauren</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mahony, Nancy A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Harrison, Megan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Green, David</creatorcontrib><title>Habitat-mediated breeding performance of Lewis's Woodpeckers (Melanerpes lewis) in British Columbia</title><title>PloS one</title><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><description>Tree cavities provide a critical resource for cavity-nesting animals, and high quality cavities can be difficult for animals to acquire in habitats where competition is high. We investigated the breeding performance of Lewis's Woodpeckers in three habitat types in British Columbia, Canada in 2013 and 2014. We also assessed whether the number of nest competitors and cavity availability influenced the habitat specific breeding performance of this threatened cavity nesting species. We found that daily nest survival rate was lower in burned habitat (0.15 ± 0.08 (0.05-0.37)) than in live pine (0.72 ± 0.10 (0.51-0.87)) or cottonwood (0.69 ± 0.09 (0.51-0.83)) habitats. However, hatching success (the proportion of eggs that hatch) was lower in live pine habitat (0.59 ± 0.09 95% CI) than burned (0.77 ± 0.19 95% CI) or cottonwood (0.80 ± 0.07 95% CI) habitat, and the fledging success of successful nests in live pine and burned habitat (1.86 ± 0.31 and 1.88 ± 0.59 95% CI, respectively) was slightly lower than in cottonwood habitat (2.61 ± 0.45 95% CI). Consequently, Lewis's Woodpeckers in cottonwood habitat produced more fledglings per nesting attempt (2.05 ± 0.49 95% CI) than in live pine (1.53 ± 0.35 95% CI) or burned (0.79 ± 0.49 95% CI) habitat. Habitats differed in the number of nesting competitors and the number of suitable cavities surrounding active Lewis's Woodpecker nests. Our results showed that cavity density best explained breeding performance differences although the mechanisms remain unclear. There was no evidence that the number of heterospecific nest competitors, including the invasive European Starling (Sturnus vulgaris), explained or influenced Lewis's Woodpecker breeding performance. Cavity density influenced the productivity of successful nests but did not explain habitat differences in hatching success or daily nest survival. Further work is required to understand the mechanistic basis for the habitat specific breeding performance of Lewis's Woodpeckers. Habitat differences in breeding performance in British Columbia are not consistent with those in other regions, highlighting the importance of regionally-specific demographic data for managing species at risk.</description><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>Animal behavior</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Behavior</subject><subject>Biology and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Birds</subject><subject>Birds - physiology</subject><subject>Breeding</subject><subject>British Columbia</subject><subject>Cavities</subject><subject>Cavity nesting</subject><subject>Conservation of Natural Resources - methods</subject><subject>Demographics</subject><subject>Density</subject><subject>Ecology and Environmental Sciences</subject><subject>Eggs</subject><subject>Endangered Species</subject><subject>Forests</subject><subject>Habitats</subject><subject>Hatching</subject><subject>Introduced Species</subject><subject>Juveniles</subject><subject>Nesting</subject><subject>Nesting Behavior - physiology</subject><subject>Nests</subject><subject>People and places</subject><subject>Picidae</subject><subject>Pine</subject><subject>Production management</subject><subject>Risk management</subject><subject>Sexual Behavior, Animal - physiology</subject><subject>Social Sciences</subject><subject>Sturnus vulgaris</subject><subject>Survival</subject><subject>Threatened species</subject><subject>Trees</subject><subject>Wildlife conservation</subject><subject>Wildlife management</subject><subject>Woodpeckers</subject><issn>1932-6203</issn><issn>1932-6203</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNp1Uk2LFDEQbURxP_QfiAY8rB5mzHcnF2Ed1F0Y8aJ4DOmkejZjd6dNehT_vRmnd9kBJYcUVa9evSpeVT0jeElYTd5s4y4NtluOcYAlpoRqqh9Up0QzupAUs4f34pPqLOctxoIpKR9XJwwrzRgXp5W7sk2Y7LTowQc7gUdNghIOGzRCamPq7eAAxRat4VfIFxl9i9GP4L5DyujVJ-jsAGmEjLp9_TUKA3qXwhTyDVrFbtc3wT6pHrW2y_B0_s-rrx_ef1ldLdafP16vLtcLJzSbFtYrxijDHohgtlHOWy6UqpmnTc1a6wUF3wgpQRMiGsXqshAvlYYDr7lm59WLA-_YxWzm-2RDiRZMEqZoQVwfED7arRlT6G36baIN5m8ipo2xaQquA4PLcKwYwSAw51Jp1XpMqNW15rSVuHC9naftmnI8B8OUbHdEelwZwo3ZxJ9GciqJ2hO8nAlS_LGDPP1H8oza2KIqDG0sZK4P2ZlLUbSImteqoJb_QJXnoQ-uOKQNJX_UwA8NLsWcE7R3wgk2e3_dijF7f5nZX6Xt-f2l75puDcX-AN3BzCs</recordid><startdate>20190320</startdate><enddate>20190320</enddate><creator>Macfarland, Lauren</creator><creator>Mahony, Nancy A</creator><creator>Harrison, Megan</creator><creator>Green, David</creator><general>Public Library of Science</general><general>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2767-6695</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20190320</creationdate><title>Habitat-mediated breeding performance of Lewis's Woodpeckers (Melanerpes lewis) in British Columbia</title><author>Macfarland, Lauren ; Mahony, Nancy A ; Harrison, Megan ; Green, David</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c593t-ad833230de153ab8cda458873d2b73fad52edb566e9115b837005473fb4e47493</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>Animal behavior</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Behavior</topic><topic>Biology and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Birds</topic><topic>Birds - physiology</topic><topic>Breeding</topic><topic>British Columbia</topic><topic>Cavities</topic><topic>Cavity nesting</topic><topic>Conservation of Natural Resources - methods</topic><topic>Demographics</topic><topic>Density</topic><topic>Ecology and Environmental Sciences</topic><topic>Eggs</topic><topic>Endangered Species</topic><topic>Forests</topic><topic>Habitats</topic><topic>Hatching</topic><topic>Introduced Species</topic><topic>Juveniles</topic><topic>Nesting</topic><topic>Nesting Behavior - physiology</topic><topic>Nests</topic><topic>People and places</topic><topic>Picidae</topic><topic>Pine</topic><topic>Production management</topic><topic>Risk management</topic><topic>Sexual Behavior, Animal - physiology</topic><topic>Social Sciences</topic><topic>Sturnus vulgaris</topic><topic>Survival</topic><topic>Threatened species</topic><topic>Trees</topic><topic>Wildlife conservation</topic><topic>Wildlife management</topic><topic>Woodpeckers</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Macfarland, Lauren</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mahony, Nancy A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Harrison, Megan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Green, David</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Materials Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agriculture Science Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>Access via ProQuest (Open Access)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Macfarland, Lauren</au><au>Mahony, Nancy A</au><au>Harrison, Megan</au><au>Green, David</au><au>Kajtoch, Łukasz</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Habitat-mediated breeding performance of Lewis's Woodpeckers (Melanerpes lewis) in British Columbia</atitle><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><date>2019-03-20</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>14</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>e0212929</spage><pages>e0212929-</pages><issn>1932-6203</issn><eissn>1932-6203</eissn><abstract>Tree cavities provide a critical resource for cavity-nesting animals, and high quality cavities can be difficult for animals to acquire in habitats where competition is high. We investigated the breeding performance of Lewis's Woodpeckers in three habitat types in British Columbia, Canada in 2013 and 2014. We also assessed whether the number of nest competitors and cavity availability influenced the habitat specific breeding performance of this threatened cavity nesting species. We found that daily nest survival rate was lower in burned habitat (0.15 ± 0.08 (0.05-0.37)) than in live pine (0.72 ± 0.10 (0.51-0.87)) or cottonwood (0.69 ± 0.09 (0.51-0.83)) habitats. However, hatching success (the proportion of eggs that hatch) was lower in live pine habitat (0.59 ± 0.09 95% CI) than burned (0.77 ± 0.19 95% CI) or cottonwood (0.80 ± 0.07 95% CI) habitat, and the fledging success of successful nests in live pine and burned habitat (1.86 ± 0.31 and 1.88 ± 0.59 95% CI, respectively) was slightly lower than in cottonwood habitat (2.61 ± 0.45 95% CI). Consequently, Lewis's Woodpeckers in cottonwood habitat produced more fledglings per nesting attempt (2.05 ± 0.49 95% CI) than in live pine (1.53 ± 0.35 95% CI) or burned (0.79 ± 0.49 95% CI) habitat. Habitats differed in the number of nesting competitors and the number of suitable cavities surrounding active Lewis's Woodpecker nests. Our results showed that cavity density best explained breeding performance differences although the mechanisms remain unclear. There was no evidence that the number of heterospecific nest competitors, including the invasive European Starling (Sturnus vulgaris), explained or influenced Lewis's Woodpecker breeding performance. Cavity density influenced the productivity of successful nests but did not explain habitat differences in hatching success or daily nest survival. Further work is required to understand the mechanistic basis for the habitat specific breeding performance of Lewis's Woodpeckers. Habitat differences in breeding performance in British Columbia are not consistent with those in other regions, highlighting the importance of regionally-specific demographic data for managing species at risk.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Public Library of Science</pub><pmid>30893345</pmid><doi>10.1371/journal.pone.0212929</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2767-6695</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1932-6203 |
ispartof | PloS one, 2019-03, Vol.14 (3), p.e0212929 |
issn | 1932-6203 1932-6203 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_plos_journals_2195361382 |
source | Public Library of Science (PLoS) Journals Open Access; MEDLINE; EZB Free E-Journals; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; PubMed Central; Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry |
subjects | Analysis Animal behavior Animals Behavior Biology and Life Sciences Birds Birds - physiology Breeding British Columbia Cavities Cavity nesting Conservation of Natural Resources - methods Demographics Density Ecology and Environmental Sciences Eggs Endangered Species Forests Habitats Hatching Introduced Species Juveniles Nesting Nesting Behavior - physiology Nests People and places Picidae Pine Production management Risk management Sexual Behavior, Animal - physiology Social Sciences Sturnus vulgaris Survival Threatened species Trees Wildlife conservation Wildlife management Woodpeckers |
title | Habitat-mediated breeding performance of Lewis's Woodpeckers (Melanerpes lewis) in British Columbia |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-03T16%3A15%3A22IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_plos_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Habitat-mediated%20breeding%20performance%20of%20Lewis's%20Woodpeckers%20(Melanerpes%20lewis)%20in%20British%20Columbia&rft.jtitle=PloS%20one&rft.au=Macfarland,%20Lauren&rft.date=2019-03-20&rft.volume=14&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=e0212929&rft.pages=e0212929-&rft.issn=1932-6203&rft.eissn=1932-6203&rft_id=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0212929&rft_dat=%3Cgale_plos_%3EA579457478%3C/gale_plos_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2195361382&rft_id=info:pmid/30893345&rft_galeid=A579457478&rft_doaj_id=oai_doaj_org_article_0a4508310e50446898fd012a97942f60&rfr_iscdi=true |