Comparison of detector performance in small 6 MV and 6 MV FFF beams using a Versa HD accelerator
Investigate the applicability of a series of detectors in small field dosimetry and the possible differences between their responses to FF and FFF beams. This work extends upon the series of detectors used by other authors to also include metal-oxide-semiconductor field-effect transistors (MOSFETs)...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | PloS one 2019-03, Vol.14 (3), p.e0213253 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | e0213253 |
container_title | PloS one |
container_volume | 14 |
creator | Monasor Denia, Paula Castellet García, María Del Carmen Manjón García, Carla Quirós Higueras, Juan David de Marco Blancas, Noelia Bonaque Alandí, Jorge Juan Senabre, Xavier Jordi Santos Serra, Agustín López-Tarjuelo, Juan |
description | Investigate the applicability of a series of detectors in small field dosimetry and the possible differences between their responses to FF and FFF beams. This work extends upon the series of detectors used by other authors to also include metal-oxide-semiconductor field-effect transistors (MOSFETs) detectors and radiochromic film. We also included a later correction of output factors (OFs) recommended by the recently published IAEA´s code of practice TRS 483 on dosimetry of small static fields used in external beam radiotherapy.
The OFs, profiles, and PDDs of 6 MV and 6 MV FFF beams were measured with 11 different detectors using field sizes between 0.6 × 0.6 cm2 and 10 × 10 cm2.
The OFs of the FFF beams were lower than those of the FF beams for field sizes larger than 3 × 3 cm2 but higher for field sizes smaller than 3 × 3 cm2. After applying the IAEA´s TRS 483 corrections, the final OFs were compatible with our initial results when considering uncertainties involved. Small-volume detectors are preferable for measuring the penumbra of these small fields where this attribute is higher in the crossline direction than in the inline direction. The R100 of equivalent-quality FFF beams was higher compared to the corresponding flattened beams.
We observed no difference for the dose responses between 6 MV and 6 MV FFF beams for any of the detectors. OF results, profiles and PDDs were clearly consistent with the previously published literature regarding the Versa HD linac. Correcting our first OFs, taken as ratio of detector charges, with the IAEA´s TRS 483 corrections to obtain the final OFs, did not make the former significantly different. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1371/journal.pone.0213253 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_plos_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_plos_journals_2190823644</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A577991090</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_b81c52ffb06448f2953d3294a9447ca0</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A577991090</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-7394689c6625480154dbec0851e3f14f836022276b38ae2227ac3dc3f99f5ef43</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNk11v0zAUhiMEYmPwDxBYQkJw0eKPxI1vkKZCWaWhSXz01pw4duspsTs7QfDvcWg2NWgXyBc-sp_39fGxT5Y9J3hO2IK8u_Z9cNDM997pOaaE0YI9yE6JYHTGKWYPj-KT7EmM1xgXrOT8cXbCcFlwUrLT7MfSt3sINnqHvEG17rTqfEB7HYwPLTilkXUottA0iKPPGwSuPgSr1QpVGtqI-mjdFgHa6BABXXxAoJRudIDk9DR7ZKCJ-tk4n2XfVx-_LS9ml1ef1svzy5nignazBRM5L4XinBZ5iUmR15VWKU2imSG5KRnHlNIFr1gJeohAsVoxI4QptMnZWfby4LtvfJRjcaKkROCSMp4PxPpA1B6u5T7YFsJv6cHKvws-bCWEzqpGy6okqqDGVDgJS0NFwWpGRQ4izxcKcPJ6P57WV62ulXZdgGZiOt1xdie3_qfkOSGE82TwZjQI_qbXsZOtjaloDTjt-0PeucC8HNBX_6D3326ktpAuYJ3x6Vw1mMrzYrEQgmAx5D2_h0qj1q1V6ScZm9YngrcTQWI6_avbQh-jXH_98v_s1WbKvj5idxqabhd903fWuzgF8wOogo8xaHNXZILl0Ai31ZBDI8ixEZLsxfED3Ylufz77A_hV_xY</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2190823644</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison of detector performance in small 6 MV and 6 MV FFF beams using a Versa HD accelerator</title><source>Public Library of Science (PLoS) Journals Open Access</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry</source><creator>Monasor Denia, Paula ; Castellet García, María Del Carmen ; Manjón García, Carla ; Quirós Higueras, Juan David ; de Marco Blancas, Noelia ; Bonaque Alandí, Jorge ; Juan Senabre, Xavier Jordi ; Santos Serra, Agustín ; López-Tarjuelo, Juan</creator><creatorcontrib>Monasor Denia, Paula ; Castellet García, María Del Carmen ; Manjón García, Carla ; Quirós Higueras, Juan David ; de Marco Blancas, Noelia ; Bonaque Alandí, Jorge ; Juan Senabre, Xavier Jordi ; Santos Serra, Agustín ; López-Tarjuelo, Juan</creatorcontrib><description>Investigate the applicability of a series of detectors in small field dosimetry and the possible differences between their responses to FF and FFF beams. This work extends upon the series of detectors used by other authors to also include metal-oxide-semiconductor field-effect transistors (MOSFETs) detectors and radiochromic film. We also included a later correction of output factors (OFs) recommended by the recently published IAEA´s code of practice TRS 483 on dosimetry of small static fields used in external beam radiotherapy.
The OFs, profiles, and PDDs of 6 MV and 6 MV FFF beams were measured with 11 different detectors using field sizes between 0.6 × 0.6 cm2 and 10 × 10 cm2.
The OFs of the FFF beams were lower than those of the FF beams for field sizes larger than 3 × 3 cm2 but higher for field sizes smaller than 3 × 3 cm2. After applying the IAEA´s TRS 483 corrections, the final OFs were compatible with our initial results when considering uncertainties involved. Small-volume detectors are preferable for measuring the penumbra of these small fields where this attribute is higher in the crossline direction than in the inline direction. The R100 of equivalent-quality FFF beams was higher compared to the corresponding flattened beams.
We observed no difference for the dose responses between 6 MV and 6 MV FFF beams for any of the detectors. OF results, profiles and PDDs were clearly consistent with the previously published literature regarding the Versa HD linac. Correcting our first OFs, taken as ratio of detector charges, with the IAEA´s TRS 483 corrections to obtain the final OFs, did not make the former significantly different.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0213253</identifier><identifier>PMID: 30856183</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Public Library of Science</publisher><subject>Analysis ; Beams (radiation) ; Comparative analysis ; Detection equipment ; Detectors ; Dosimeters ; Dosimetry ; Earth Sciences ; Engineering and Technology ; Field effect transistors ; High definition television ; Humans ; Medicine and Health Sciences ; MOSFET (Transistors) ; MOSFETs ; Nuclear energy ; Particle Accelerators ; Phantoms, Imaging ; Photon beams ; Physical Sciences ; Radiation therapy ; Radiometry - instrumentation ; Radiometry - methods ; Radiotherapy ; Research and analysis methods ; Semiconductor devices ; Sensors ; Transistors ; Transistors, Electronic</subject><ispartof>PloS one, 2019-03, Vol.14 (3), p.e0213253</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2019 Public Library of Science</rights><rights>2019 Monasor Denia et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>2019 Monasor Denia et al 2019 Monasor Denia et al</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-7394689c6625480154dbec0851e3f14f836022276b38ae2227ac3dc3f99f5ef43</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-7394689c6625480154dbec0851e3f14f836022276b38ae2227ac3dc3f99f5ef43</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-8056-2737</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6411166/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6411166/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,860,881,2096,2915,23845,27901,27902,53766,53768,79342,79343</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30856183$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Monasor Denia, Paula</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Castellet García, María Del Carmen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Manjón García, Carla</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Quirós Higueras, Juan David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Marco Blancas, Noelia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bonaque Alandí, Jorge</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Juan Senabre, Xavier Jordi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Santos Serra, Agustín</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>López-Tarjuelo, Juan</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of detector performance in small 6 MV and 6 MV FFF beams using a Versa HD accelerator</title><title>PloS one</title><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><description>Investigate the applicability of a series of detectors in small field dosimetry and the possible differences between their responses to FF and FFF beams. This work extends upon the series of detectors used by other authors to also include metal-oxide-semiconductor field-effect transistors (MOSFETs) detectors and radiochromic film. We also included a later correction of output factors (OFs) recommended by the recently published IAEA´s code of practice TRS 483 on dosimetry of small static fields used in external beam radiotherapy.
The OFs, profiles, and PDDs of 6 MV and 6 MV FFF beams were measured with 11 different detectors using field sizes between 0.6 × 0.6 cm2 and 10 × 10 cm2.
The OFs of the FFF beams were lower than those of the FF beams for field sizes larger than 3 × 3 cm2 but higher for field sizes smaller than 3 × 3 cm2. After applying the IAEA´s TRS 483 corrections, the final OFs were compatible with our initial results when considering uncertainties involved. Small-volume detectors are preferable for measuring the penumbra of these small fields where this attribute is higher in the crossline direction than in the inline direction. The R100 of equivalent-quality FFF beams was higher compared to the corresponding flattened beams.
We observed no difference for the dose responses between 6 MV and 6 MV FFF beams for any of the detectors. OF results, profiles and PDDs were clearly consistent with the previously published literature regarding the Versa HD linac. Correcting our first OFs, taken as ratio of detector charges, with the IAEA´s TRS 483 corrections to obtain the final OFs, did not make the former significantly different.</description><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>Beams (radiation)</subject><subject>Comparative analysis</subject><subject>Detection equipment</subject><subject>Detectors</subject><subject>Dosimeters</subject><subject>Dosimetry</subject><subject>Earth Sciences</subject><subject>Engineering and Technology</subject><subject>Field effect transistors</subject><subject>High definition television</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Medicine and Health Sciences</subject><subject>MOSFET (Transistors)</subject><subject>MOSFETs</subject><subject>Nuclear energy</subject><subject>Particle Accelerators</subject><subject>Phantoms, Imaging</subject><subject>Photon beams</subject><subject>Physical Sciences</subject><subject>Radiation therapy</subject><subject>Radiometry - instrumentation</subject><subject>Radiometry - methods</subject><subject>Radiotherapy</subject><subject>Research and analysis methods</subject><subject>Semiconductor devices</subject><subject>Sensors</subject><subject>Transistors</subject><subject>Transistors, Electronic</subject><issn>1932-6203</issn><issn>1932-6203</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNqNk11v0zAUhiMEYmPwDxBYQkJw0eKPxI1vkKZCWaWhSXz01pw4duspsTs7QfDvcWg2NWgXyBc-sp_39fGxT5Y9J3hO2IK8u_Z9cNDM997pOaaE0YI9yE6JYHTGKWYPj-KT7EmM1xgXrOT8cXbCcFlwUrLT7MfSt3sINnqHvEG17rTqfEB7HYwPLTilkXUottA0iKPPGwSuPgSr1QpVGtqI-mjdFgHa6BABXXxAoJRudIDk9DR7ZKCJ-tk4n2XfVx-_LS9ml1ef1svzy5nignazBRM5L4XinBZ5iUmR15VWKU2imSG5KRnHlNIFr1gJeohAsVoxI4QptMnZWfby4LtvfJRjcaKkROCSMp4PxPpA1B6u5T7YFsJv6cHKvws-bCWEzqpGy6okqqDGVDgJS0NFwWpGRQ4izxcKcPJ6P57WV62ulXZdgGZiOt1xdie3_qfkOSGE82TwZjQI_qbXsZOtjaloDTjt-0PeucC8HNBX_6D3326ktpAuYJ3x6Vw1mMrzYrEQgmAx5D2_h0qj1q1V6ScZm9YngrcTQWI6_avbQh-jXH_98v_s1WbKvj5idxqabhd903fWuzgF8wOogo8xaHNXZILl0Ai31ZBDI8ixEZLsxfED3Ylufz77A_hV_xY</recordid><startdate>20190311</startdate><enddate>20190311</enddate><creator>Monasor Denia, Paula</creator><creator>Castellet García, María Del Carmen</creator><creator>Manjón García, Carla</creator><creator>Quirós Higueras, Juan David</creator><creator>de Marco Blancas, Noelia</creator><creator>Bonaque Alandí, Jorge</creator><creator>Juan Senabre, Xavier Jordi</creator><creator>Santos Serra, Agustín</creator><creator>López-Tarjuelo, Juan</creator><general>Public Library of Science</general><general>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>IOV</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8056-2737</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20190311</creationdate><title>Comparison of detector performance in small 6 MV and 6 MV FFF beams using a Versa HD accelerator</title><author>Monasor Denia, Paula ; Castellet García, María Del Carmen ; Manjón García, Carla ; Quirós Higueras, Juan David ; de Marco Blancas, Noelia ; Bonaque Alandí, Jorge ; Juan Senabre, Xavier Jordi ; Santos Serra, Agustín ; López-Tarjuelo, Juan</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-7394689c6625480154dbec0851e3f14f836022276b38ae2227ac3dc3f99f5ef43</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>Beams (radiation)</topic><topic>Comparative analysis</topic><topic>Detection equipment</topic><topic>Detectors</topic><topic>Dosimeters</topic><topic>Dosimetry</topic><topic>Earth Sciences</topic><topic>Engineering and Technology</topic><topic>Field effect transistors</topic><topic>High definition television</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Medicine and Health Sciences</topic><topic>MOSFET (Transistors)</topic><topic>MOSFETs</topic><topic>Nuclear energy</topic><topic>Particle Accelerators</topic><topic>Phantoms, Imaging</topic><topic>Photon beams</topic><topic>Physical Sciences</topic><topic>Radiation therapy</topic><topic>Radiometry - instrumentation</topic><topic>Radiometry - methods</topic><topic>Radiotherapy</topic><topic>Research and analysis methods</topic><topic>Semiconductor devices</topic><topic>Sensors</topic><topic>Transistors</topic><topic>Transistors, Electronic</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Monasor Denia, Paula</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Castellet García, María Del Carmen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Manjón García, Carla</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Quirós Higueras, Juan David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Marco Blancas, Noelia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bonaque Alandí, Jorge</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Juan Senabre, Xavier Jordi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Santos Serra, Agustín</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>López-Tarjuelo, Juan</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Opposing Viewpoints</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Materials Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Monasor Denia, Paula</au><au>Castellet García, María Del Carmen</au><au>Manjón García, Carla</au><au>Quirós Higueras, Juan David</au><au>de Marco Blancas, Noelia</au><au>Bonaque Alandí, Jorge</au><au>Juan Senabre, Xavier Jordi</au><au>Santos Serra, Agustín</au><au>López-Tarjuelo, Juan</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison of detector performance in small 6 MV and 6 MV FFF beams using a Versa HD accelerator</atitle><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><date>2019-03-11</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>14</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>e0213253</spage><pages>e0213253-</pages><issn>1932-6203</issn><eissn>1932-6203</eissn><abstract>Investigate the applicability of a series of detectors in small field dosimetry and the possible differences between their responses to FF and FFF beams. This work extends upon the series of detectors used by other authors to also include metal-oxide-semiconductor field-effect transistors (MOSFETs) detectors and radiochromic film. We also included a later correction of output factors (OFs) recommended by the recently published IAEA´s code of practice TRS 483 on dosimetry of small static fields used in external beam radiotherapy.
The OFs, profiles, and PDDs of 6 MV and 6 MV FFF beams were measured with 11 different detectors using field sizes between 0.6 × 0.6 cm2 and 10 × 10 cm2.
The OFs of the FFF beams were lower than those of the FF beams for field sizes larger than 3 × 3 cm2 but higher for field sizes smaller than 3 × 3 cm2. After applying the IAEA´s TRS 483 corrections, the final OFs were compatible with our initial results when considering uncertainties involved. Small-volume detectors are preferable for measuring the penumbra of these small fields where this attribute is higher in the crossline direction than in the inline direction. The R100 of equivalent-quality FFF beams was higher compared to the corresponding flattened beams.
We observed no difference for the dose responses between 6 MV and 6 MV FFF beams for any of the detectors. OF results, profiles and PDDs were clearly consistent with the previously published literature regarding the Versa HD linac. Correcting our first OFs, taken as ratio of detector charges, with the IAEA´s TRS 483 corrections to obtain the final OFs, did not make the former significantly different.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Public Library of Science</pub><pmid>30856183</pmid><doi>10.1371/journal.pone.0213253</doi><tpages>e0213253</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8056-2737</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1932-6203 |
ispartof | PloS one, 2019-03, Vol.14 (3), p.e0213253 |
issn | 1932-6203 1932-6203 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_plos_journals_2190823644 |
source | Public Library of Science (PLoS) Journals Open Access; MEDLINE; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; PubMed Central; Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry |
subjects | Analysis Beams (radiation) Comparative analysis Detection equipment Detectors Dosimeters Dosimetry Earth Sciences Engineering and Technology Field effect transistors High definition television Humans Medicine and Health Sciences MOSFET (Transistors) MOSFETs Nuclear energy Particle Accelerators Phantoms, Imaging Photon beams Physical Sciences Radiation therapy Radiometry - instrumentation Radiometry - methods Radiotherapy Research and analysis methods Semiconductor devices Sensors Transistors Transistors, Electronic |
title | Comparison of detector performance in small 6 MV and 6 MV FFF beams using a Versa HD accelerator |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-11T04%3A15%3A31IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_plos_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20of%20detector%20performance%20in%20small%206%20MV%20and%206%20MV%20FFF%20beams%20using%20a%20Versa%20HD%20accelerator&rft.jtitle=PloS%20one&rft.au=Monasor%20Denia,%20Paula&rft.date=2019-03-11&rft.volume=14&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=e0213253&rft.pages=e0213253-&rft.issn=1932-6203&rft.eissn=1932-6203&rft_id=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0213253&rft_dat=%3Cgale_plos_%3EA577991090%3C/gale_plos_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2190823644&rft_id=info:pmid/30856183&rft_galeid=A577991090&rft_doaj_id=oai_doaj_org_article_b81c52ffb06448f2953d3294a9447ca0&rfr_iscdi=true |