The growing pains of physician-administration relationships in an academic medical center and the effects on physician engagement
Physician engagement has become a key metric for healthcare leadership and is associated with better healthcare outcomes. However, engagement tends to be low and difficult to measure and improve. This study sought to efficiently characterize the professional cultural dynamics between physicians and...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | PloS one 2019-02, Vol.14 (2), p.e0212014-e0212014 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | e0212014 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | e0212014 |
container_title | PloS one |
container_volume | 14 |
creator | Keller, Eric J Giafaglione, Brad Chrisman, Howard B Collins, Jeremy D Vogelzang, Robert L |
description | Physician engagement has become a key metric for healthcare leadership and is associated with better healthcare outcomes. However, engagement tends to be low and difficult to measure and improve. This study sought to efficiently characterize the professional cultural dynamics between physicians and administrators at an academic hospital and how those dynamics affect physician engagement.
A qualitative mixed methods analysis was completed in 6 weeks, consisting of a preliminary analysis of the hospital system's history that was used to purposefully recruit 20 physicians across specialties and 20 healthcare administrators across management levels for semi-structured interviews and observation. Participation rates of 77% (20/26) and 83% (20/24) were achieved for physicians and administrators, respectively. Cohorts consisted of equal numbers of men and women with experience ranging from 1 to 35 years within the organization. Field notes and transcripts were systematically analyzed using an iterative inductive-deductive approach. Emergent themes were presented and discussed with approximately 400 physicians and administrators within the organization to assess validity and which results were most meaningful.
This investigation indicated a professional cultural disconnect was undermining efforts to improve physician engagement. This disconnect was further complicated by a minority (10%) not believing an issue existed and conflicting connotations not readily perceived by participants who often offered similar solutions. Physicians and administrators felt these results accurately reflected their realities and used this information as a common language to plan targeted interventions to improve physician engagement. Limitations of the study included its cross-sectional nature with a modest sample size at a single institution.
A qualitative mixed methods analysis efficiently identified professional cultural barriers within an academic hospital to serve as an institution-specific guide to improving physician engagement. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1371/journal.pone.0212014 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_plos_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_plos_journals_2179684259</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A573981628</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_3abe76f11a2a4b15a04d1b8ee6b78a9b</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A573981628</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-d91b15111d8397616697df20c018aaaaaf5338bf2f92947b99f4bb24c27ed4273</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNk12L1DAUhoso7rr6D0QLgujFjE3Sps2NsCx-DCws6OptOE2TNkObdJNW3Uv_uelMZ53KXlgCDclz3nPyJieKnqNkjUiO3m3t6Ay0694auU4wwglKH0SniBG8ojghD4_mJ9ET77dJkpGC0sfRCUnyjKEMnUa_rxsZ187-1KaOe9DGx1bFfXPrtdBgVlB12mg_OBi0NbGT7W7iG937WJsYwhBQyU6LuJOVFtDGQppBurBVxUNQl0pJMQRd81c3lqaGWnaBfBo9UtB6-Wz-n0XfPn64vvi8urz6tLk4v1wJyvCwqhgqQ8UIVQVhOUWUsrxSOBEJKmD6VEZIUSqsGGZpXjKm0rLEqcC5rFKck7Po5V63b63ns3ueY5QzWqQ4Y4HY7InKwpb3TnfgbrkFzXcL1tUc3KBFKzmBUuZUIQQY0lAXJGmFykJKWuYFsDJovZ-zjWXwZbLEQbsQXe4Y3fDa_uCU5ISlOAi8mQWcvRmlH3invZBtC0bacaq7yDM0-RDQV_-g959upmoIB9BG2ZBXTKL8PAs5C0RxEaj1PdThisNTUzqsLwLeLgICM8hfQw2j93zz9cv_s1ffl-zrI7aR0A6Nt-24e31LMN2DwlnvnVR3JqOET51ycINPncLnTglhL44v6C7o0BrkDzlrEBw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2179684259</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The growing pains of physician-administration relationships in an academic medical center and the effects on physician engagement</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry</source><creator>Keller, Eric J ; Giafaglione, Brad ; Chrisman, Howard B ; Collins, Jeremy D ; Vogelzang, Robert L</creator><contributor>Ewen, Heidi H.</contributor><creatorcontrib>Keller, Eric J ; Giafaglione, Brad ; Chrisman, Howard B ; Collins, Jeremy D ; Vogelzang, Robert L ; Ewen, Heidi H.</creatorcontrib><description>Physician engagement has become a key metric for healthcare leadership and is associated with better healthcare outcomes. However, engagement tends to be low and difficult to measure and improve. This study sought to efficiently characterize the professional cultural dynamics between physicians and administrators at an academic hospital and how those dynamics affect physician engagement.
A qualitative mixed methods analysis was completed in 6 weeks, consisting of a preliminary analysis of the hospital system's history that was used to purposefully recruit 20 physicians across specialties and 20 healthcare administrators across management levels for semi-structured interviews and observation. Participation rates of 77% (20/26) and 83% (20/24) were achieved for physicians and administrators, respectively. Cohorts consisted of equal numbers of men and women with experience ranging from 1 to 35 years within the organization. Field notes and transcripts were systematically analyzed using an iterative inductive-deductive approach. Emergent themes were presented and discussed with approximately 400 physicians and administrators within the organization to assess validity and which results were most meaningful.
This investigation indicated a professional cultural disconnect was undermining efforts to improve physician engagement. This disconnect was further complicated by a minority (10%) not believing an issue existed and conflicting connotations not readily perceived by participants who often offered similar solutions. Physicians and administrators felt these results accurately reflected their realities and used this information as a common language to plan targeted interventions to improve physician engagement. Limitations of the study included its cross-sectional nature with a modest sample size at a single institution.
A qualitative mixed methods analysis efficiently identified professional cultural barriers within an academic hospital to serve as an institution-specific guide to improving physician engagement.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0212014</identifier><identifier>PMID: 30759151</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Public Library of Science</publisher><subject>Academic Medical Centers - organization & administration ; Academic Medical Centers - statistics & numerical data ; Adult ; Analysis ; Attitude of Health Personnel ; Biology and Life Sciences ; Communication ; Cross-Sectional Studies ; Cultural differences ; Culture ; Data collection ; Decision making ; Engineering and Technology ; Female ; Health care ; Health care facilities ; Health care industry ; Health care policy ; Health care reform ; Health Facility Administrators - psychology ; Health Facility Administrators - statistics & numerical data ; Hospitals ; Humans ; Interdisciplinary Communication ; Interprofessional Relations ; Interviews ; Leadership ; Male ; Medical centers ; Medical personnel ; Medical research ; Medical schools ; Medicine ; Medicine and Health Sciences ; Methods ; Middle Aged ; Occupational Stress - etiology ; Operations management ; People and Places ; Physician-Patient Relations ; Physicians ; Physicians - psychology ; Physicians - statistics & numerical data ; Public relations executives ; Qualitative analysis ; Qualitative Research ; Research and Analysis Methods ; Social Sciences ; Software ; Work Engagement</subject><ispartof>PloS one, 2019-02, Vol.14 (2), p.e0212014-e0212014</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2019 Public Library of Science</rights><rights>2019 Keller et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>2019 Keller et al 2019 Keller et al</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-d91b15111d8397616697df20c018aaaaaf5338bf2f92947b99f4bb24c27ed4273</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-d91b15111d8397616697df20c018aaaaaf5338bf2f92947b99f4bb24c27ed4273</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-5684-7943</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6373942/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6373942/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,724,777,781,861,882,2096,2915,23847,27905,27906,53772,53774,79349,79350</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30759151$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Ewen, Heidi H.</contributor><creatorcontrib>Keller, Eric J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Giafaglione, Brad</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chrisman, Howard B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Collins, Jeremy D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vogelzang, Robert L</creatorcontrib><title>The growing pains of physician-administration relationships in an academic medical center and the effects on physician engagement</title><title>PloS one</title><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><description>Physician engagement has become a key metric for healthcare leadership and is associated with better healthcare outcomes. However, engagement tends to be low and difficult to measure and improve. This study sought to efficiently characterize the professional cultural dynamics between physicians and administrators at an academic hospital and how those dynamics affect physician engagement.
A qualitative mixed methods analysis was completed in 6 weeks, consisting of a preliminary analysis of the hospital system's history that was used to purposefully recruit 20 physicians across specialties and 20 healthcare administrators across management levels for semi-structured interviews and observation. Participation rates of 77% (20/26) and 83% (20/24) were achieved for physicians and administrators, respectively. Cohorts consisted of equal numbers of men and women with experience ranging from 1 to 35 years within the organization. Field notes and transcripts were systematically analyzed using an iterative inductive-deductive approach. Emergent themes were presented and discussed with approximately 400 physicians and administrators within the organization to assess validity and which results were most meaningful.
This investigation indicated a professional cultural disconnect was undermining efforts to improve physician engagement. This disconnect was further complicated by a minority (10%) not believing an issue existed and conflicting connotations not readily perceived by participants who often offered similar solutions. Physicians and administrators felt these results accurately reflected their realities and used this information as a common language to plan targeted interventions to improve physician engagement. Limitations of the study included its cross-sectional nature with a modest sample size at a single institution.
A qualitative mixed methods analysis efficiently identified professional cultural barriers within an academic hospital to serve as an institution-specific guide to improving physician engagement.</description><subject>Academic Medical Centers - organization & administration</subject><subject>Academic Medical Centers - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>Attitude of Health Personnel</subject><subject>Biology and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Communication</subject><subject>Cross-Sectional Studies</subject><subject>Cultural differences</subject><subject>Culture</subject><subject>Data collection</subject><subject>Decision making</subject><subject>Engineering and Technology</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Health care</subject><subject>Health care facilities</subject><subject>Health care industry</subject><subject>Health care policy</subject><subject>Health care reform</subject><subject>Health Facility Administrators - psychology</subject><subject>Health Facility Administrators - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Hospitals</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Interdisciplinary Communication</subject><subject>Interprofessional Relations</subject><subject>Interviews</subject><subject>Leadership</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical centers</subject><subject>Medical personnel</subject><subject>Medical research</subject><subject>Medical schools</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine and Health Sciences</subject><subject>Methods</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Occupational Stress - etiology</subject><subject>Operations management</subject><subject>People and Places</subject><subject>Physician-Patient Relations</subject><subject>Physicians</subject><subject>Physicians - psychology</subject><subject>Physicians - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Public relations executives</subject><subject>Qualitative analysis</subject><subject>Qualitative Research</subject><subject>Research and Analysis Methods</subject><subject>Social Sciences</subject><subject>Software</subject><subject>Work Engagement</subject><issn>1932-6203</issn><issn>1932-6203</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNqNk12L1DAUhoso7rr6D0QLgujFjE3Sps2NsCx-DCws6OptOE2TNkObdJNW3Uv_uelMZ53KXlgCDclz3nPyJieKnqNkjUiO3m3t6Ay0694auU4wwglKH0SniBG8ojghD4_mJ9ET77dJkpGC0sfRCUnyjKEMnUa_rxsZ187-1KaOe9DGx1bFfXPrtdBgVlB12mg_OBi0NbGT7W7iG937WJsYwhBQyU6LuJOVFtDGQppBurBVxUNQl0pJMQRd81c3lqaGWnaBfBo9UtB6-Wz-n0XfPn64vvi8urz6tLk4v1wJyvCwqhgqQ8UIVQVhOUWUsrxSOBEJKmD6VEZIUSqsGGZpXjKm0rLEqcC5rFKck7Po5V63b63ns3ueY5QzWqQ4Y4HY7InKwpb3TnfgbrkFzXcL1tUc3KBFKzmBUuZUIQQY0lAXJGmFykJKWuYFsDJovZ-zjWXwZbLEQbsQXe4Y3fDa_uCU5ISlOAi8mQWcvRmlH3invZBtC0bacaq7yDM0-RDQV_-g959upmoIB9BG2ZBXTKL8PAs5C0RxEaj1PdThisNTUzqsLwLeLgICM8hfQw2j93zz9cv_s1ffl-zrI7aR0A6Nt-24e31LMN2DwlnvnVR3JqOET51ycINPncLnTglhL44v6C7o0BrkDzlrEBw</recordid><startdate>20190213</startdate><enddate>20190213</enddate><creator>Keller, Eric J</creator><creator>Giafaglione, Brad</creator><creator>Chrisman, Howard B</creator><creator>Collins, Jeremy D</creator><creator>Vogelzang, Robert L</creator><general>Public Library of Science</general><general>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>IOV</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5684-7943</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20190213</creationdate><title>The growing pains of physician-administration relationships in an academic medical center and the effects on physician engagement</title><author>Keller, Eric J ; Giafaglione, Brad ; Chrisman, Howard B ; Collins, Jeremy D ; Vogelzang, Robert L</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-d91b15111d8397616697df20c018aaaaaf5338bf2f92947b99f4bb24c27ed4273</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Academic Medical Centers - organization & administration</topic><topic>Academic Medical Centers - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>Attitude of Health Personnel</topic><topic>Biology and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Communication</topic><topic>Cross-Sectional Studies</topic><topic>Cultural differences</topic><topic>Culture</topic><topic>Data collection</topic><topic>Decision making</topic><topic>Engineering and Technology</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Health care</topic><topic>Health care facilities</topic><topic>Health care industry</topic><topic>Health care policy</topic><topic>Health care reform</topic><topic>Health Facility Administrators - psychology</topic><topic>Health Facility Administrators - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Hospitals</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Interdisciplinary Communication</topic><topic>Interprofessional Relations</topic><topic>Interviews</topic><topic>Leadership</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical centers</topic><topic>Medical personnel</topic><topic>Medical research</topic><topic>Medical schools</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine and Health Sciences</topic><topic>Methods</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Occupational Stress - etiology</topic><topic>Operations management</topic><topic>People and Places</topic><topic>Physician-Patient Relations</topic><topic>Physicians</topic><topic>Physicians - psychology</topic><topic>Physicians - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Public relations executives</topic><topic>Qualitative analysis</topic><topic>Qualitative Research</topic><topic>Research and Analysis Methods</topic><topic>Social Sciences</topic><topic>Software</topic><topic>Work Engagement</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Keller, Eric J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Giafaglione, Brad</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chrisman, Howard B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Collins, Jeremy D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vogelzang, Robert L</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Opposing Viewpoints</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Materials Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Keller, Eric J</au><au>Giafaglione, Brad</au><au>Chrisman, Howard B</au><au>Collins, Jeremy D</au><au>Vogelzang, Robert L</au><au>Ewen, Heidi H.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The growing pains of physician-administration relationships in an academic medical center and the effects on physician engagement</atitle><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><date>2019-02-13</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>14</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>e0212014</spage><epage>e0212014</epage><pages>e0212014-e0212014</pages><issn>1932-6203</issn><eissn>1932-6203</eissn><abstract>Physician engagement has become a key metric for healthcare leadership and is associated with better healthcare outcomes. However, engagement tends to be low and difficult to measure and improve. This study sought to efficiently characterize the professional cultural dynamics between physicians and administrators at an academic hospital and how those dynamics affect physician engagement.
A qualitative mixed methods analysis was completed in 6 weeks, consisting of a preliminary analysis of the hospital system's history that was used to purposefully recruit 20 physicians across specialties and 20 healthcare administrators across management levels for semi-structured interviews and observation. Participation rates of 77% (20/26) and 83% (20/24) were achieved for physicians and administrators, respectively. Cohorts consisted of equal numbers of men and women with experience ranging from 1 to 35 years within the organization. Field notes and transcripts were systematically analyzed using an iterative inductive-deductive approach. Emergent themes were presented and discussed with approximately 400 physicians and administrators within the organization to assess validity and which results were most meaningful.
This investigation indicated a professional cultural disconnect was undermining efforts to improve physician engagement. This disconnect was further complicated by a minority (10%) not believing an issue existed and conflicting connotations not readily perceived by participants who often offered similar solutions. Physicians and administrators felt these results accurately reflected their realities and used this information as a common language to plan targeted interventions to improve physician engagement. Limitations of the study included its cross-sectional nature with a modest sample size at a single institution.
A qualitative mixed methods analysis efficiently identified professional cultural barriers within an academic hospital to serve as an institution-specific guide to improving physician engagement.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Public Library of Science</pub><pmid>30759151</pmid><doi>10.1371/journal.pone.0212014</doi><tpages>e0212014</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5684-7943</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1932-6203 |
ispartof | PloS one, 2019-02, Vol.14 (2), p.e0212014-e0212014 |
issn | 1932-6203 1932-6203 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_plos_journals_2179684259 |
source | MEDLINE; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Public Library of Science (PLoS); PubMed Central; Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry |
subjects | Academic Medical Centers - organization & administration Academic Medical Centers - statistics & numerical data Adult Analysis Attitude of Health Personnel Biology and Life Sciences Communication Cross-Sectional Studies Cultural differences Culture Data collection Decision making Engineering and Technology Female Health care Health care facilities Health care industry Health care policy Health care reform Health Facility Administrators - psychology Health Facility Administrators - statistics & numerical data Hospitals Humans Interdisciplinary Communication Interprofessional Relations Interviews Leadership Male Medical centers Medical personnel Medical research Medical schools Medicine Medicine and Health Sciences Methods Middle Aged Occupational Stress - etiology Operations management People and Places Physician-Patient Relations Physicians Physicians - psychology Physicians - statistics & numerical data Public relations executives Qualitative analysis Qualitative Research Research and Analysis Methods Social Sciences Software Work Engagement |
title | The growing pains of physician-administration relationships in an academic medical center and the effects on physician engagement |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-19T10%3A24%3A09IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_plos_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20growing%20pains%20of%20physician-administration%20relationships%20in%20an%20academic%20medical%20center%20and%20the%20effects%20on%20physician%20engagement&rft.jtitle=PloS%20one&rft.au=Keller,%20Eric%20J&rft.date=2019-02-13&rft.volume=14&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=e0212014&rft.epage=e0212014&rft.pages=e0212014-e0212014&rft.issn=1932-6203&rft.eissn=1932-6203&rft_id=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0212014&rft_dat=%3Cgale_plos_%3EA573981628%3C/gale_plos_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2179684259&rft_id=info:pmid/30759151&rft_galeid=A573981628&rft_doaj_id=oai_doaj_org_article_3abe76f11a2a4b15a04d1b8ee6b78a9b&rfr_iscdi=true |