Conservation planning for species recovery under the Endangered Species Act: A case study with the Northern Spotted Owl
The northern spotted owl (Strix occidentalis caurina) was listed as threatened under the U.S. Endangered Species Act (ESA) in 1990. We applied modern spatial conservation theory and models to evaluate several candidate critical habitat networks, and sought an efficient conservation solution that enc...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | PloS one 2019-01, Vol.14 (1), p.e0210643-e0210643 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | e0210643 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | e0210643 |
container_title | PloS one |
container_volume | 14 |
creator | Dunk, Jeffrey R Woodbridge, Brian Schumaker, Nathan Glenn, Elizabeth M White, Brendan LaPlante, David W Anthony, Robert G Davis, Raymond J Halupka, Karl Henson, Paul Marcot, Bruce G Merola-Zwartjes, Michele Noon, Barry R Raphael, Martin G Caicco, Jody Hansen, Dan L Mazurek, Mary Jo Thrailkill, James |
description | The northern spotted owl (Strix occidentalis caurina) was listed as threatened under the U.S. Endangered Species Act (ESA) in 1990. We applied modern spatial conservation theory and models to evaluate several candidate critical habitat networks, and sought an efficient conservation solution that encompassed the highest value lands for spotted owl recovery rather than maximizing the total area of potential critical habitat. We created a map of relative habitat suitability, which served as input to the spatial conservation prioritization program Zonation. We used the spatially-explicit individual-based population model HexSim to estimate and compare simulated spotted owl population outcomes among a suite of candidate critical habitat networks that varied in size and spatial arrangement under alternative scenarios of future habitat suitability and barred owl (S. varia) effects. We evaluated simulated spotted owl population outcomes, including total population size, and extinction and quasi-extinction likelihoods for 108 combinations of candidate critical habitat networks by habitat change by barred owl scenarios, both range-wide and within 11 distinct portions of the owl's range. Barred owl encounter rates and the amount and suitability of habitat had substantial effects on simulated spotted owl populations. When barred owl encounter rates were high, changes in the amount and suitability of habitat had minimal impacts on population performance. Under lowered barred owl encounter rates, candidate critical habitat networks that included most existing high suitability habitat supported a high likelihood of long-term population persistence. Barred owls are currently the primary driving force behind poor population performance of NSOs; however, our models demonstrated that a sufficient area of high suitability habitat remains essential for recovery when effects of barred owls can be reduced. The modeling approach we employed is sufficiently flexible to incorporate new information about spotted owls as it becomes available and could likely be applied to conservation planning for other species. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1371/journal.pone.0210643 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_plos_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_plos_journals_2167013072</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A569547870</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_13e453b91892463cb9d1e753bcefe90b</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A569547870</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-fd445335287b1846e39bdb2ca75f5b7d1d7f1baf52295122d55947e96b23e2e93</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNk11v0zAUhiMEYmPwDxBEQkJw0RLbSVxzgVRVAypNVGLAreXYJ6mn1C6209J_j7NmU4N2gXxh6_g5r8-HT5K8RNkUEYo-3NjOGdFOt9bANMMoK3PyKDlHjOBJiTPy-OR8ljzz_ibLCjIry6fJGYlwxnJ6nuwX1nhwOxG0Nem2FcZo06S1danfgtTgUwfS7sAd0s4ocGlYQ3pplDANOFDp9UDNZfiYzlMpPKQ-dOqQ7nVY39LfrIubM5G1IUSf1b59njypRevhxbBfJD8_X_5YfJ1crb4sF_OriSwZDpNa5XlBSIFntEKzvATCKlVhKWhRFxVVSNEaVaIuMGYFwlgVRUwLWFlhAhgYuUheH3W3rfV8qJnnGJU0QySjOBLLI6GsuOFbpzfCHbgVmt8arGu4cEHLFjgiEKOpGJoxnJdEVkwhoNEioQaWVVHr0_BaV21ASTDBiXYkOr4xes0bu-MlIQiRPph3g4CzvzvwgW-0l9DGvoDt-rgpI3nfu4i--Qd9OLuBakRMQJvaxndlL8rnRcmKnM5oFqnpA1RcCjZaxg9W62gfObwfOUQmwJ_QiM57vrz-_v_s6teYfXvCrkG0Ye1t2_W_04_B_AhKZ713UN8XGWW8n4-7avB-PvgwH9Ht1WmD7p3uBoL8BXIeCtY</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2167013072</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Conservation planning for species recovery under the Endangered Species Act: A case study with the Northern Spotted Owl</title><source>PubMed (Medline)</source><source>PLoS</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Full-Text Journals in Chemistry (Open access)</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>EZB Electronic Journals Library</source><creator>Dunk, Jeffrey R ; Woodbridge, Brian ; Schumaker, Nathan ; Glenn, Elizabeth M ; White, Brendan ; LaPlante, David W ; Anthony, Robert G ; Davis, Raymond J ; Halupka, Karl ; Henson, Paul ; Marcot, Bruce G ; Merola-Zwartjes, Michele ; Noon, Barry R ; Raphael, Martin G ; Caicco, Jody ; Hansen, Dan L ; Mazurek, Mary Jo ; Thrailkill, James</creator><creatorcontrib>Dunk, Jeffrey R ; Woodbridge, Brian ; Schumaker, Nathan ; Glenn, Elizabeth M ; White, Brendan ; LaPlante, David W ; Anthony, Robert G ; Davis, Raymond J ; Halupka, Karl ; Henson, Paul ; Marcot, Bruce G ; Merola-Zwartjes, Michele ; Noon, Barry R ; Raphael, Martin G ; Caicco, Jody ; Hansen, Dan L ; Mazurek, Mary Jo ; Thrailkill, James</creatorcontrib><description>The northern spotted owl (Strix occidentalis caurina) was listed as threatened under the U.S. Endangered Species Act (ESA) in 1990. We applied modern spatial conservation theory and models to evaluate several candidate critical habitat networks, and sought an efficient conservation solution that encompassed the highest value lands for spotted owl recovery rather than maximizing the total area of potential critical habitat. We created a map of relative habitat suitability, which served as input to the spatial conservation prioritization program Zonation. We used the spatially-explicit individual-based population model HexSim to estimate and compare simulated spotted owl population outcomes among a suite of candidate critical habitat networks that varied in size and spatial arrangement under alternative scenarios of future habitat suitability and barred owl (S. varia) effects. We evaluated simulated spotted owl population outcomes, including total population size, and extinction and quasi-extinction likelihoods for 108 combinations of candidate critical habitat networks by habitat change by barred owl scenarios, both range-wide and within 11 distinct portions of the owl's range. Barred owl encounter rates and the amount and suitability of habitat had substantial effects on simulated spotted owl populations. When barred owl encounter rates were high, changes in the amount and suitability of habitat had minimal impacts on population performance. Under lowered barred owl encounter rates, candidate critical habitat networks that included most existing high suitability habitat supported a high likelihood of long-term population persistence. Barred owls are currently the primary driving force behind poor population performance of NSOs; however, our models demonstrated that a sufficient area of high suitability habitat remains essential for recovery when effects of barred owls can be reduced. The modeling approach we employed is sufficiently flexible to incorporate new information about spotted owls as it becomes available and could likely be applied to conservation planning for other species.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0210643</identifier><identifier>PMID: 30640947</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Public Library of Science</publisher><subject>Animals ; Biology and Life Sciences ; Case reports ; Computer and Information Sciences ; Computer simulation ; Conservation ; Conservation of Natural Resources - legislation & jurisprudence ; Ecology and Environmental Sciences ; Ecosystem ; Endangered & extinct species ; Endangered species ; Endangered Species - legislation & jurisprudence ; Extinction ; Habitat changes ; Habitats ; Networks ; Owls ; Population number ; Recovery ; Recovery (Medical) ; Species extinction ; Strigiformes ; Strix occidentalis caurina ; Wildlife conservation ; Wildlife management ; Zonation</subject><ispartof>PloS one, 2019-01, Vol.14 (1), p.e0210643-e0210643</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2019 Public Library of Science</rights><rights>This is an open access article, free of all copyright, and may be freely reproduced, distributed, transmitted, modified, built upon, or otherwise used by anyone for any lawful purpose. The work is made available under the Creative Commons CC0 public domain dedication: https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-fd445335287b1846e39bdb2ca75f5b7d1d7f1baf52295122d55947e96b23e2e93</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-fd445335287b1846e39bdb2ca75f5b7d1d7f1baf52295122d55947e96b23e2e93</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-3213-9272</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6331132/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6331132/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,860,881,2096,2915,23845,27901,27902,53766,53768,79342,79343</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30640947$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Dunk, Jeffrey R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Woodbridge, Brian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schumaker, Nathan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Glenn, Elizabeth M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>White, Brendan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>LaPlante, David W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Anthony, Robert G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Davis, Raymond J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Halupka, Karl</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Henson, Paul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marcot, Bruce G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Merola-Zwartjes, Michele</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Noon, Barry R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Raphael, Martin G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Caicco, Jody</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hansen, Dan L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mazurek, Mary Jo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thrailkill, James</creatorcontrib><title>Conservation planning for species recovery under the Endangered Species Act: A case study with the Northern Spotted Owl</title><title>PloS one</title><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><description>The northern spotted owl (Strix occidentalis caurina) was listed as threatened under the U.S. Endangered Species Act (ESA) in 1990. We applied modern spatial conservation theory and models to evaluate several candidate critical habitat networks, and sought an efficient conservation solution that encompassed the highest value lands for spotted owl recovery rather than maximizing the total area of potential critical habitat. We created a map of relative habitat suitability, which served as input to the spatial conservation prioritization program Zonation. We used the spatially-explicit individual-based population model HexSim to estimate and compare simulated spotted owl population outcomes among a suite of candidate critical habitat networks that varied in size and spatial arrangement under alternative scenarios of future habitat suitability and barred owl (S. varia) effects. We evaluated simulated spotted owl population outcomes, including total population size, and extinction and quasi-extinction likelihoods for 108 combinations of candidate critical habitat networks by habitat change by barred owl scenarios, both range-wide and within 11 distinct portions of the owl's range. Barred owl encounter rates and the amount and suitability of habitat had substantial effects on simulated spotted owl populations. When barred owl encounter rates were high, changes in the amount and suitability of habitat had minimal impacts on population performance. Under lowered barred owl encounter rates, candidate critical habitat networks that included most existing high suitability habitat supported a high likelihood of long-term population persistence. Barred owls are currently the primary driving force behind poor population performance of NSOs; however, our models demonstrated that a sufficient area of high suitability habitat remains essential for recovery when effects of barred owls can be reduced. The modeling approach we employed is sufficiently flexible to incorporate new information about spotted owls as it becomes available and could likely be applied to conservation planning for other species.</description><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Biology and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Case reports</subject><subject>Computer and Information Sciences</subject><subject>Computer simulation</subject><subject>Conservation</subject><subject>Conservation of Natural Resources - legislation & jurisprudence</subject><subject>Ecology and Environmental Sciences</subject><subject>Ecosystem</subject><subject>Endangered & extinct species</subject><subject>Endangered species</subject><subject>Endangered Species - legislation & jurisprudence</subject><subject>Extinction</subject><subject>Habitat changes</subject><subject>Habitats</subject><subject>Networks</subject><subject>Owls</subject><subject>Population number</subject><subject>Recovery</subject><subject>Recovery (Medical)</subject><subject>Species extinction</subject><subject>Strigiformes</subject><subject>Strix occidentalis caurina</subject><subject>Wildlife conservation</subject><subject>Wildlife management</subject><subject>Zonation</subject><issn>1932-6203</issn><issn>1932-6203</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNqNk11v0zAUhiMEYmPwDxBEQkJw0RLbSVxzgVRVAypNVGLAreXYJ6mn1C6209J_j7NmU4N2gXxh6_g5r8-HT5K8RNkUEYo-3NjOGdFOt9bANMMoK3PyKDlHjOBJiTPy-OR8ljzz_ibLCjIry6fJGYlwxnJ6nuwX1nhwOxG0Nem2FcZo06S1danfgtTgUwfS7sAd0s4ocGlYQ3pplDANOFDp9UDNZfiYzlMpPKQ-dOqQ7nVY39LfrIubM5G1IUSf1b59njypRevhxbBfJD8_X_5YfJ1crb4sF_OriSwZDpNa5XlBSIFntEKzvATCKlVhKWhRFxVVSNEaVaIuMGYFwlgVRUwLWFlhAhgYuUheH3W3rfV8qJnnGJU0QySjOBLLI6GsuOFbpzfCHbgVmt8arGu4cEHLFjgiEKOpGJoxnJdEVkwhoNEioQaWVVHr0_BaV21ASTDBiXYkOr4xes0bu-MlIQiRPph3g4CzvzvwgW-0l9DGvoDt-rgpI3nfu4i--Qd9OLuBakRMQJvaxndlL8rnRcmKnM5oFqnpA1RcCjZaxg9W62gfObwfOUQmwJ_QiM57vrz-_v_s6teYfXvCrkG0Ye1t2_W_04_B_AhKZ713UN8XGWW8n4-7avB-PvgwH9Ht1WmD7p3uBoL8BXIeCtY</recordid><startdate>20190114</startdate><enddate>20190114</enddate><creator>Dunk, Jeffrey R</creator><creator>Woodbridge, Brian</creator><creator>Schumaker, Nathan</creator><creator>Glenn, Elizabeth M</creator><creator>White, Brendan</creator><creator>LaPlante, David W</creator><creator>Anthony, Robert G</creator><creator>Davis, Raymond J</creator><creator>Halupka, Karl</creator><creator>Henson, Paul</creator><creator>Marcot, Bruce G</creator><creator>Merola-Zwartjes, Michele</creator><creator>Noon, Barry R</creator><creator>Raphael, Martin G</creator><creator>Caicco, Jody</creator><creator>Hansen, Dan L</creator><creator>Mazurek, Mary Jo</creator><creator>Thrailkill, James</creator><general>Public Library of Science</general><general>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>IOV</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3213-9272</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20190114</creationdate><title>Conservation planning for species recovery under the Endangered Species Act: A case study with the Northern Spotted Owl</title><author>Dunk, Jeffrey R ; Woodbridge, Brian ; Schumaker, Nathan ; Glenn, Elizabeth M ; White, Brendan ; LaPlante, David W ; Anthony, Robert G ; Davis, Raymond J ; Halupka, Karl ; Henson, Paul ; Marcot, Bruce G ; Merola-Zwartjes, Michele ; Noon, Barry R ; Raphael, Martin G ; Caicco, Jody ; Hansen, Dan L ; Mazurek, Mary Jo ; Thrailkill, James</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-fd445335287b1846e39bdb2ca75f5b7d1d7f1baf52295122d55947e96b23e2e93</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Biology and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Case reports</topic><topic>Computer and Information Sciences</topic><topic>Computer simulation</topic><topic>Conservation</topic><topic>Conservation of Natural Resources - legislation & jurisprudence</topic><topic>Ecology and Environmental Sciences</topic><topic>Ecosystem</topic><topic>Endangered & extinct species</topic><topic>Endangered species</topic><topic>Endangered Species - legislation & jurisprudence</topic><topic>Extinction</topic><topic>Habitat changes</topic><topic>Habitats</topic><topic>Networks</topic><topic>Owls</topic><topic>Population number</topic><topic>Recovery</topic><topic>Recovery (Medical)</topic><topic>Species extinction</topic><topic>Strigiformes</topic><topic>Strix occidentalis caurina</topic><topic>Wildlife conservation</topic><topic>Wildlife management</topic><topic>Zonation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Dunk, Jeffrey R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Woodbridge, Brian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schumaker, Nathan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Glenn, Elizabeth M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>White, Brendan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>LaPlante, David W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Anthony, Robert G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Davis, Raymond J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Halupka, Karl</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Henson, Paul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marcot, Bruce G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Merola-Zwartjes, Michele</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Noon, Barry R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Raphael, Martin G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Caicco, Jody</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hansen, Dan L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mazurek, Mary Jo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thrailkill, James</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Opposing Viewpoints In Context</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Nursing and Allied Health Journals</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database (1962 - current)</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>https://resources.nclive.org/materials</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agriculture Science Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>PML(ProQuest Medical Library)</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Dunk, Jeffrey R</au><au>Woodbridge, Brian</au><au>Schumaker, Nathan</au><au>Glenn, Elizabeth M</au><au>White, Brendan</au><au>LaPlante, David W</au><au>Anthony, Robert G</au><au>Davis, Raymond J</au><au>Halupka, Karl</au><au>Henson, Paul</au><au>Marcot, Bruce G</au><au>Merola-Zwartjes, Michele</au><au>Noon, Barry R</au><au>Raphael, Martin G</au><au>Caicco, Jody</au><au>Hansen, Dan L</au><au>Mazurek, Mary Jo</au><au>Thrailkill, James</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Conservation planning for species recovery under the Endangered Species Act: A case study with the Northern Spotted Owl</atitle><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><date>2019-01-14</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>14</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>e0210643</spage><epage>e0210643</epage><pages>e0210643-e0210643</pages><issn>1932-6203</issn><eissn>1932-6203</eissn><abstract>The northern spotted owl (Strix occidentalis caurina) was listed as threatened under the U.S. Endangered Species Act (ESA) in 1990. We applied modern spatial conservation theory and models to evaluate several candidate critical habitat networks, and sought an efficient conservation solution that encompassed the highest value lands for spotted owl recovery rather than maximizing the total area of potential critical habitat. We created a map of relative habitat suitability, which served as input to the spatial conservation prioritization program Zonation. We used the spatially-explicit individual-based population model HexSim to estimate and compare simulated spotted owl population outcomes among a suite of candidate critical habitat networks that varied in size and spatial arrangement under alternative scenarios of future habitat suitability and barred owl (S. varia) effects. We evaluated simulated spotted owl population outcomes, including total population size, and extinction and quasi-extinction likelihoods for 108 combinations of candidate critical habitat networks by habitat change by barred owl scenarios, both range-wide and within 11 distinct portions of the owl's range. Barred owl encounter rates and the amount and suitability of habitat had substantial effects on simulated spotted owl populations. When barred owl encounter rates were high, changes in the amount and suitability of habitat had minimal impacts on population performance. Under lowered barred owl encounter rates, candidate critical habitat networks that included most existing high suitability habitat supported a high likelihood of long-term population persistence. Barred owls are currently the primary driving force behind poor population performance of NSOs; however, our models demonstrated that a sufficient area of high suitability habitat remains essential for recovery when effects of barred owls can be reduced. The modeling approach we employed is sufficiently flexible to incorporate new information about spotted owls as it becomes available and could likely be applied to conservation planning for other species.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Public Library of Science</pub><pmid>30640947</pmid><doi>10.1371/journal.pone.0210643</doi><tpages>e0210643</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3213-9272</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1932-6203 |
ispartof | PloS one, 2019-01, Vol.14 (1), p.e0210643-e0210643 |
issn | 1932-6203 1932-6203 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_plos_journals_2167013072 |
source | PubMed (Medline); PLoS; MEDLINE; Full-Text Journals in Chemistry (Open access); DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; EZB Electronic Journals Library |
subjects | Animals Biology and Life Sciences Case reports Computer and Information Sciences Computer simulation Conservation Conservation of Natural Resources - legislation & jurisprudence Ecology and Environmental Sciences Ecosystem Endangered & extinct species Endangered species Endangered Species - legislation & jurisprudence Extinction Habitat changes Habitats Networks Owls Population number Recovery Recovery (Medical) Species extinction Strigiformes Strix occidentalis caurina Wildlife conservation Wildlife management Zonation |
title | Conservation planning for species recovery under the Endangered Species Act: A case study with the Northern Spotted Owl |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-11T16%3A05%3A34IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_plos_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Conservation%20planning%20for%20species%20recovery%20under%20the%20Endangered%20Species%20Act:%20A%20case%20study%20with%20the%20Northern%20Spotted%20Owl&rft.jtitle=PloS%20one&rft.au=Dunk,%20Jeffrey%20R&rft.date=2019-01-14&rft.volume=14&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=e0210643&rft.epage=e0210643&rft.pages=e0210643-e0210643&rft.issn=1932-6203&rft.eissn=1932-6203&rft_id=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0210643&rft_dat=%3Cgale_plos_%3EA569547870%3C/gale_plos_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2167013072&rft_id=info:pmid/30640947&rft_galeid=A569547870&rft_doaj_id=oai_doaj_org_article_13e453b91892463cb9d1e753bcefe90b&rfr_iscdi=true |