A computer-based incentivized food basket choice tool: Presentation and evaluation

To develop and evaluate a low-cost computer-based tool to elicit dietary choices in an incentive compatible manner, which can be used on-line or as part of a laboratory study. The study was conducted with around 255 adults. Respondents were asked to allocate a fixed monetary budget across a choice o...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:PloS one 2019-01, Vol.14 (1), p.e0210061-e0210061
Hauptverfasser: Spiteri, Jonathan, James, Jonathan, Belot, Michèle
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page e0210061
container_issue 1
container_start_page e0210061
container_title PloS one
container_volume 14
creator Spiteri, Jonathan
James, Jonathan
Belot, Michèle
description To develop and evaluate a low-cost computer-based tool to elicit dietary choices in an incentive compatible manner, which can be used on-line or as part of a laboratory study. The study was conducted with around 255 adults. Respondents were asked to allocate a fixed monetary budget across a choice of around a hundred grocery items with the prospect of receiving these items with some probability delivered to their home by a real supermarket. The tool covers a broad range of food items, allows inference of macro-nutrients and calories, and allows the researcher to fix the choice set participants can choose from. We compare the information derived from our incentivized tool, and compare it to alternative low-cost ways of measuring dietary intake, namely the food frequency questionnaire and a one-shot version of the 24-hour dietary recall, which are both based on self-reports. We compare the calorie intake indicators derived from each tool with a number of biometric measures for each subject, namely weight, body-mass-index (BMI) and waist size. The results show that the dietary information collected is only weakly correlated across the three methods. We find that only the calorie intake measure from our incentivized tool is positively and significantly related to each of the biometric indicators. Specifically, a 10% increase in calorie intake is associated with a 1.5% increase in BMI. By contrast, we find no significant correlations for either of the two measures based on self-reports. The computer-based tool is a promising new, low-cost measure of dietary choices, particularly in one-shot situations where such behaviours are only observed once, whereas other tools like 24-hour dietary recalls and food frequency questionnaires may be more suited when they are administered repeatedly. The tool may be useful for research conducted with limited time and budget.
doi_str_mv 10.1371/journal.pone.0210061
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_plos_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_plos_journals_2166102347</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A569062784</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_179adf75bb9d44b1a9a7db7daf44fe99</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A569062784</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-655c88a1ab5f2c9577c06c59ac50c21596e32a90745b0336088125d70b7a7ac03</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkl1v0zAUhiMEYmPwDxBEQkJw0eKP2I65QKomPipNGhoft9aJ7bQuaVxipwJ-Pc6aTQ3aBfKF7ePnvPY5frPsKUZzTAV-s_F910Iz3_nWzhHBCHF8LzvFkpIZJ4jeP1qfZI9C2CDEaMn5w-yEIk4kL-hpdrXItd_u-mi7WQXBmty12rbR7d2ftKm9N3mK_7Ax12vvtM2j983b_HNnQ8IgOt_m0Jrc7qHpr7ePswc1NME-Geez7NuH91_PP80uLj8uzxcXM80liTPOmC5LwFCxmmjJhNCIayZBM6QJZpJbSkAiUbAKUcpRWWLCjECVAAEa0bPs-UF31_igxnYERTDnGBFaiEQsD4TxsFG7zm2h-608OHUd8N1KQRedbqzCQoKpBasqaYqiwiBBmEoYqIuitlImrXfjbX21tWboUQfNRHR60rq1Wvm94pSUmJEk8GoU6PzP3oaoti5o2zTQWt8P7xaSUsnpUNmLf9C7qxupFaQCXFv7dK8eRNWCcZm-WJRFouZ3UGkYu3U6ead2KT5JeD1JSEy0v-IK-hDU8svV_7OX36fsyyN2baGJ6-CbfrBMmILFAdSdD6Gz9W2TMVKD9W-6oQbrq9H6Ke3Z8QfdJt14nf4FSEX9rw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2166102347</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A computer-based incentivized food basket choice tool: Presentation and evaluation</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Public Library of Science</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry</source><source>EZB Electronic Journals Library</source><creator>Spiteri, Jonathan ; James, Jonathan ; Belot, Michèle</creator><contributor>Buckland, Nicola</contributor><creatorcontrib>Spiteri, Jonathan ; James, Jonathan ; Belot, Michèle ; Buckland, Nicola</creatorcontrib><description>To develop and evaluate a low-cost computer-based tool to elicit dietary choices in an incentive compatible manner, which can be used on-line or as part of a laboratory study. The study was conducted with around 255 adults. Respondents were asked to allocate a fixed monetary budget across a choice of around a hundred grocery items with the prospect of receiving these items with some probability delivered to their home by a real supermarket. The tool covers a broad range of food items, allows inference of macro-nutrients and calories, and allows the researcher to fix the choice set participants can choose from. We compare the information derived from our incentivized tool, and compare it to alternative low-cost ways of measuring dietary intake, namely the food frequency questionnaire and a one-shot version of the 24-hour dietary recall, which are both based on self-reports. We compare the calorie intake indicators derived from each tool with a number of biometric measures for each subject, namely weight, body-mass-index (BMI) and waist size. The results show that the dietary information collected is only weakly correlated across the three methods. We find that only the calorie intake measure from our incentivized tool is positively and significantly related to each of the biometric indicators. Specifically, a 10% increase in calorie intake is associated with a 1.5% increase in BMI. By contrast, we find no significant correlations for either of the two measures based on self-reports. The computer-based tool is a promising new, low-cost measure of dietary choices, particularly in one-shot situations where such behaviours are only observed once, whereas other tools like 24-hour dietary recalls and food frequency questionnaires may be more suited when they are administered repeatedly. The tool may be useful for research conducted with limited time and budget.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0210061</identifier><identifier>PMID: 30629643</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Public Library of Science</publisher><subject>Adults ; Analysis ; Biology and Life Sciences ; Body mass ; Calories ; Choice (Psychology) ; Computational Biology - methods ; Cost-Benefit Analysis ; Diet ; Diet Records ; Diet Surveys - economics ; Diet Surveys - methods ; Dietary intake ; Economics ; Energy Intake - physiology ; Epidemiology ; Food ; Food intake ; Food Preferences - physiology ; General practitioners ; Health care ; Humans ; Indexing ; Indicators ; Laboratories ; Low cost ; Low income groups ; Management ; Medical research ; Medical sciences ; Medicine and Health Sciences ; Methods ; Nutrients ; Nutrition research ; Obesity ; Practice ; Preventive medicine ; Public health ; Reproducibility of Results ; Research and Analysis Methods ; Research methodology ; Researchers ; Supermarkets ; Weight</subject><ispartof>PloS one, 2019-01, Vol.14 (1), p.e0210061-e0210061</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2019 Public Library of Science</rights><rights>2019 Spiteri et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>2019 Spiteri et al 2019 Spiteri et al</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-655c88a1ab5f2c9577c06c59ac50c21596e32a90745b0336088125d70b7a7ac03</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-655c88a1ab5f2c9577c06c59ac50c21596e32a90745b0336088125d70b7a7ac03</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-8206-1637</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6328152/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6328152/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,864,885,2102,2928,23866,27924,27925,53791,53793,79600,79601</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30629643$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Buckland, Nicola</contributor><creatorcontrib>Spiteri, Jonathan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>James, Jonathan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Belot, Michèle</creatorcontrib><title>A computer-based incentivized food basket choice tool: Presentation and evaluation</title><title>PloS one</title><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><description>To develop and evaluate a low-cost computer-based tool to elicit dietary choices in an incentive compatible manner, which can be used on-line or as part of a laboratory study. The study was conducted with around 255 adults. Respondents were asked to allocate a fixed monetary budget across a choice of around a hundred grocery items with the prospect of receiving these items with some probability delivered to their home by a real supermarket. The tool covers a broad range of food items, allows inference of macro-nutrients and calories, and allows the researcher to fix the choice set participants can choose from. We compare the information derived from our incentivized tool, and compare it to alternative low-cost ways of measuring dietary intake, namely the food frequency questionnaire and a one-shot version of the 24-hour dietary recall, which are both based on self-reports. We compare the calorie intake indicators derived from each tool with a number of biometric measures for each subject, namely weight, body-mass-index (BMI) and waist size. The results show that the dietary information collected is only weakly correlated across the three methods. We find that only the calorie intake measure from our incentivized tool is positively and significantly related to each of the biometric indicators. Specifically, a 10% increase in calorie intake is associated with a 1.5% increase in BMI. By contrast, we find no significant correlations for either of the two measures based on self-reports. The computer-based tool is a promising new, low-cost measure of dietary choices, particularly in one-shot situations where such behaviours are only observed once, whereas other tools like 24-hour dietary recalls and food frequency questionnaires may be more suited when they are administered repeatedly. The tool may be useful for research conducted with limited time and budget.</description><subject>Adults</subject><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>Biology and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Body mass</subject><subject>Calories</subject><subject>Choice (Psychology)</subject><subject>Computational Biology - methods</subject><subject>Cost-Benefit Analysis</subject><subject>Diet</subject><subject>Diet Records</subject><subject>Diet Surveys - economics</subject><subject>Diet Surveys - methods</subject><subject>Dietary intake</subject><subject>Economics</subject><subject>Energy Intake - physiology</subject><subject>Epidemiology</subject><subject>Food</subject><subject>Food intake</subject><subject>Food Preferences - physiology</subject><subject>General practitioners</subject><subject>Health care</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Indexing</subject><subject>Indicators</subject><subject>Laboratories</subject><subject>Low cost</subject><subject>Low income groups</subject><subject>Management</subject><subject>Medical research</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Medicine and Health Sciences</subject><subject>Methods</subject><subject>Nutrients</subject><subject>Nutrition research</subject><subject>Obesity</subject><subject>Practice</subject><subject>Preventive medicine</subject><subject>Public health</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>Research and Analysis Methods</subject><subject>Research methodology</subject><subject>Researchers</subject><subject>Supermarkets</subject><subject>Weight</subject><issn>1932-6203</issn><issn>1932-6203</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkl1v0zAUhiMEYmPwDxBEQkJw0eKP2I65QKomPipNGhoft9aJ7bQuaVxipwJ-Pc6aTQ3aBfKF7ePnvPY5frPsKUZzTAV-s_F910Iz3_nWzhHBCHF8LzvFkpIZJ4jeP1qfZI9C2CDEaMn5w-yEIk4kL-hpdrXItd_u-mi7WQXBmty12rbR7d2ftKm9N3mK_7Ax12vvtM2j983b_HNnQ8IgOt_m0Jrc7qHpr7ePswc1NME-Geez7NuH91_PP80uLj8uzxcXM80liTPOmC5LwFCxmmjJhNCIayZBM6QJZpJbSkAiUbAKUcpRWWLCjECVAAEa0bPs-UF31_igxnYERTDnGBFaiEQsD4TxsFG7zm2h-608OHUd8N1KQRedbqzCQoKpBasqaYqiwiBBmEoYqIuitlImrXfjbX21tWboUQfNRHR60rq1Wvm94pSUmJEk8GoU6PzP3oaoti5o2zTQWt8P7xaSUsnpUNmLf9C7qxupFaQCXFv7dK8eRNWCcZm-WJRFouZ3UGkYu3U6ead2KT5JeD1JSEy0v-IK-hDU8svV_7OX36fsyyN2baGJ6-CbfrBMmILFAdSdD6Gz9W2TMVKD9W-6oQbrq9H6Ke3Z8QfdJt14nf4FSEX9rw</recordid><startdate>20190110</startdate><enddate>20190110</enddate><creator>Spiteri, Jonathan</creator><creator>James, Jonathan</creator><creator>Belot, Michèle</creator><general>Public Library of Science</general><general>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>IOV</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8206-1637</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20190110</creationdate><title>A computer-based incentivized food basket choice tool: Presentation and evaluation</title><author>Spiteri, Jonathan ; James, Jonathan ; Belot, Michèle</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-655c88a1ab5f2c9577c06c59ac50c21596e32a90745b0336088125d70b7a7ac03</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Adults</topic><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>Biology and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Body mass</topic><topic>Calories</topic><topic>Choice (Psychology)</topic><topic>Computational Biology - methods</topic><topic>Cost-Benefit Analysis</topic><topic>Diet</topic><topic>Diet Records</topic><topic>Diet Surveys - economics</topic><topic>Diet Surveys - methods</topic><topic>Dietary intake</topic><topic>Economics</topic><topic>Energy Intake - physiology</topic><topic>Epidemiology</topic><topic>Food</topic><topic>Food intake</topic><topic>Food Preferences - physiology</topic><topic>General practitioners</topic><topic>Health care</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Indexing</topic><topic>Indicators</topic><topic>Laboratories</topic><topic>Low cost</topic><topic>Low income groups</topic><topic>Management</topic><topic>Medical research</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Medicine and Health Sciences</topic><topic>Methods</topic><topic>Nutrients</topic><topic>Nutrition research</topic><topic>Obesity</topic><topic>Practice</topic><topic>Preventive medicine</topic><topic>Public health</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>Research and Analysis Methods</topic><topic>Research methodology</topic><topic>Researchers</topic><topic>Supermarkets</topic><topic>Weight</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Spiteri, Jonathan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>James, Jonathan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Belot, Michèle</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale_Opposing Viewpoints In Context</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Database‎ (1962 - current)</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Materials Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agriculture Science Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>Access via ProQuest (Open Access)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Spiteri, Jonathan</au><au>James, Jonathan</au><au>Belot, Michèle</au><au>Buckland, Nicola</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A computer-based incentivized food basket choice tool: Presentation and evaluation</atitle><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><date>2019-01-10</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>14</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>e0210061</spage><epage>e0210061</epage><pages>e0210061-e0210061</pages><issn>1932-6203</issn><eissn>1932-6203</eissn><abstract>To develop and evaluate a low-cost computer-based tool to elicit dietary choices in an incentive compatible manner, which can be used on-line or as part of a laboratory study. The study was conducted with around 255 adults. Respondents were asked to allocate a fixed monetary budget across a choice of around a hundred grocery items with the prospect of receiving these items with some probability delivered to their home by a real supermarket. The tool covers a broad range of food items, allows inference of macro-nutrients and calories, and allows the researcher to fix the choice set participants can choose from. We compare the information derived from our incentivized tool, and compare it to alternative low-cost ways of measuring dietary intake, namely the food frequency questionnaire and a one-shot version of the 24-hour dietary recall, which are both based on self-reports. We compare the calorie intake indicators derived from each tool with a number of biometric measures for each subject, namely weight, body-mass-index (BMI) and waist size. The results show that the dietary information collected is only weakly correlated across the three methods. We find that only the calorie intake measure from our incentivized tool is positively and significantly related to each of the biometric indicators. Specifically, a 10% increase in calorie intake is associated with a 1.5% increase in BMI. By contrast, we find no significant correlations for either of the two measures based on self-reports. The computer-based tool is a promising new, low-cost measure of dietary choices, particularly in one-shot situations where such behaviours are only observed once, whereas other tools like 24-hour dietary recalls and food frequency questionnaires may be more suited when they are administered repeatedly. The tool may be useful for research conducted with limited time and budget.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Public Library of Science</pub><pmid>30629643</pmid><doi>10.1371/journal.pone.0210061</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8206-1637</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1932-6203
ispartof PloS one, 2019-01, Vol.14 (1), p.e0210061-e0210061
issn 1932-6203
1932-6203
language eng
recordid cdi_plos_journals_2166102347
source MEDLINE; Public Library of Science; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; PubMed Central; Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry; EZB Electronic Journals Library
subjects Adults
Analysis
Biology and Life Sciences
Body mass
Calories
Choice (Psychology)
Computational Biology - methods
Cost-Benefit Analysis
Diet
Diet Records
Diet Surveys - economics
Diet Surveys - methods
Dietary intake
Economics
Energy Intake - physiology
Epidemiology
Food
Food intake
Food Preferences - physiology
General practitioners
Health care
Humans
Indexing
Indicators
Laboratories
Low cost
Low income groups
Management
Medical research
Medical sciences
Medicine and Health Sciences
Methods
Nutrients
Nutrition research
Obesity
Practice
Preventive medicine
Public health
Reproducibility of Results
Research and Analysis Methods
Research methodology
Researchers
Supermarkets
Weight
title A computer-based incentivized food basket choice tool: Presentation and evaluation
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-03T19%3A18%3A51IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_plos_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20computer-based%20incentivized%20food%20basket%20choice%20tool:%20Presentation%20and%20evaluation&rft.jtitle=PloS%20one&rft.au=Spiteri,%20Jonathan&rft.date=2019-01-10&rft.volume=14&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=e0210061&rft.epage=e0210061&rft.pages=e0210061-e0210061&rft.issn=1932-6203&rft.eissn=1932-6203&rft_id=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0210061&rft_dat=%3Cgale_plos_%3EA569062784%3C/gale_plos_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2166102347&rft_id=info:pmid/30629643&rft_galeid=A569062784&rft_doaj_id=oai_doaj_org_article_179adf75bb9d44b1a9a7db7daf44fe99&rfr_iscdi=true