Evaluation of the revised sense of coherence scale in a representative German sample

To evaluate the Revised Sense of Coherence (SOC-R) scale in a large representative German sample. A nationwide household survey involving a total of 2510 face-to-face interviews. In addition to the SOC-R, childhood trauma and maltreatment (CTM), lifetime traumatic events (Childhood Trauma Questionna...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:PloS one 2018-12, Vol.13 (12), p.e0209550-e0209550
Hauptverfasser: Thoma, Myriam V, Mc Gee, Shauna L, Fegert, Jörg M, Glaesmer, Heide, Brähler, Elmar, Maercker, Andreas
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:To evaluate the Revised Sense of Coherence (SOC-R) scale in a large representative German sample. A nationwide household survey involving a total of 2510 face-to-face interviews. In addition to the SOC-R, childhood trauma and maltreatment (CTM), lifetime traumatic events (Childhood Trauma Questionnaire, CTQ, and the Life Events Checklist for DSM-5, LEC-5), and mental health (Patient Health Questionnaire, PHQ-4) were assessed. The final sample consisted of N = 2373 participants (52.3% females; M = 48.24 years). Confirmatory factor analyses confirmed a three-factor structure for the SOC-R ('manageability', 'balance', 'reflection') with acceptable indices (RMSEA .066; 90% CI [.062, .071]). Reliability analyses revealed good internal consistency (α = .87). Construct validity was supported by significant but low correlations with psychopathology. Gender marginally influenced SOC-R (t = 1.99, p = .05). Moderation analyses revealed that SOC-R exerted a protective impact on depression in the context of CTQ (t = 2.29, p < .05) and lifetime traumatic events (t = -2.37, p < .05). This study supports the psychometric properties of the SOC-R and emphasizes the importance of considering salutogenic effects to better understand interindividual differences in the effect of adversity.
ISSN:1932-6203
1932-6203
DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0209550